超双疏表面及其重入结构的研究进展

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2024-0362

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近年来，相较于超疏水和超疏油而言，超双疏表面的发展得到了研究者的广泛青睐。超双疏表面的构建除需要微纳粗糙结构和具有低表面能的长链含氟硅烷外，还需要在微纳粗糙结构中引入凹曲面即重入结构，以储存更多的空气，从而更好地支撑液体，实现对低表面能液体的疏液行为。基于此，本文首先根据应用场景的不同，对液下超双疏、空气超疏水/水下超疏油和空气超双疏三种超双疏表面进行了总结与对比，包括其各自优势和局限性。其次，重点归纳了超双疏表面重入结构中T形、双重、蘑菇形、梯形凹口等重入结构的制备方法、研究进展及其对疏液行为的影响。最后，阐述了现有超双疏表面存在的问题，并对其未来发展方向进行了展望，为推进超双疏表面研究提供参考。

关键词: 表面, 超双疏, 重入结构, 疏液性能, 微纳粗糙结构

Abstract:

In recent years, superamphiphobic surfaces have attracted widespread attention in various fields, surpassing superhydrophobic and superoleophobic. Expect for the micronano rough structure and the long chain fluorosilanes with low surface energy, it is necessary to design concave-curved surfaces (i.e. re-entrant structures) in micronano rough structure for the construction of superamphiphobic surface. This design allows more air to be stored, further supporting the liquid and achieving the hydrophobic behavior of liquids with low surface energy. According to the different application scenarios, this review firstly described and compared the current status of under-liquid superamphiphobic, under-air superhydrophobic/under-liquid superoleophobic and under-air superamphiphobic surfaces, including their respective advantage limitations. Then, the fabrication methods, research progress and their influence on the liquid repellency behavior of T-shaped re-entrants, double re-entrants, mushroom-shaped re-entrants and trapezoidal concave re-entrants were summarized. Finally, the challenges associated with superamphiphobic surfaces were discussed along with their future development directions, providing valuable insights for the research in this field.

Key words: surface, superamphiphobic, re-entrant structures, lyophobic properties, hierarchical micro/nanostructures

中图分类号:

TB383

鲍艳, 鲁劲宏, 高璐, 郭茹月, 刘超. 超双疏表面及其重入结构的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(3): 1406-1416.

BAO Yan, LU Jinhong, GAO Lu, GUO Ruyue, LIU Chao. Research progress on superamphiphobic surfaces and their reentrant structures[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2025, 44(3): 1406-1416.

图/表 10

参考文献 70

1	BARTHLOTT Wilhelm, NEINHUIS Christoph. Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces[J]. Planta, 1997, 202(1): 1-8.
2	TSUJII Kaoru, YAMAMOTO Takamasa, ONDA Tomohiro, et al. Super oil-repellent surfaces[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 1997, 36(9): 1011-1012.
3	LI Huanjun, WANG Xianbao, SONG Yanlin, et al. Super-“amphiphobic” aligned carbon nanotube films[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2001, 40(9): 1743-1746.
4	GAO Xuefeng, JIANG Lei. Water-repellent legs of water striders[J]. Nature, 2004, 432(7013): 36.
5	ZHUANG Kai, YANG Xiaolong, HUANG Wei, et al. Efficient bubble transport on bioinspired topological ultraslippery surfaces[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2021, 13(51): 61780-61788.
6	WENG Wei, TENJIMBAYASHI Mizuki, HU Wei Hsun, et al. Evolution of and disparity among biomimetic superhydrophobic surfaces with gecko, petal, and lotus effect[J]. Small, 2022, 18(18): 2270092.
7	Adham AL-AKHALI, NIE Kaixun, FANG Duoxun, et al. Fabrication of metal-based superhydrophilic and underwater superoleophobic surfaces by laser ablation and magnetron sputtering[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2023, 621: 156829.
8	ZHOU Maolin, ZHANG Lei, ZHONG Lieshuang, et al. Robust photothermal icephobic surface with mechanical durability of multi-bioinspired structures[J]. Advanced Materials, 2024, 36(3): 2305322.
9	GUO Molan, NIE Chao, ZHANG Pengyu, et al. A superamphiphobic surface with ordered hexagonal microstructures inspired by springtails[J]. New Journal of Chemistry, 2024, 48(7): 2884-2887.
10	WENZEL Robert N. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 1936, 28(8): 988-994.
11	CASSIE A B D, BAXTER S. Wettability of porous surfaces[J]. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 1944, 40: 546-551.
12	CASSIE A B D. Contact angles[J]. Discussions of the Faraday Society, 1948, 3: 11.
13	ZHANG Kaiqiang, XU Feng, GAO Yanfeng. Superhydrophobic and oleophobic dual-function coating with durablity and self-healing property based on a waterborne solution[J]. Applied Materials Today, 2021, 22: 100970.
14	WANG Xiaowei, JIA Li, DANG Chao. The wetting transition of low surface tension droplet on the special-shaped microstructure surface[J]. Colloid and Interface Science Communications, 2022, 50: 100649.
15	XU Changlian, WANG Yuzhong. Novel dual superlyophobic materials in water-oil systems: Under oil magneto-fluid transportation and oil-water separation[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2018, 6(7): 2935-2941.
16	NUZZO Ralph G, DUBOIS Lawrence H, ALLARA David L. Fundamental studies of microscopic wetting on organic surfaces. 1. Formation and structural characterization of a self-consistent series of polyfunctional organic monolayers[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1990, 112(2): 558-569.
17	ZHAO Zhihong, NING Yuzhen, JIN Xu, et al. Molecular-structure-induced under-liquid dual superlyophobic surfaces[J]. ACS Nano, 2020, 14(11): 14869-14877.
18	WANG Kai, HE Huaqiang, WEI Baibing, et al. Multifunctional switchable nanocoated membranes for efficient integrated purification of oil/water emulsions[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2021, 13(45): 54315-54323.
19	ZHU Xiaotao, GAO Zhongshuai, LI Fangchao, et al. Superlyophobic graphene oxide/polydopamine coating under liquid system for liquid/liquid separation, dye removal, and anti-corrosion[J]. Carbon, 2022, 190: 329-336.
20	KANG Yutang, JIAO Shihui, WANG Boran, et al. PVDF-modified TiO₂ nanowires membrane with underliquid dual superlyophobic property for switchable separation of oil-water emulsions[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2020, 12(36): 40925-40936.
21	WANG Wenwen, KANG Yutang, CUI Canyu, et al. Fabrication of underliquid dual superlyophobic membrane via anchoring polyethersulfone nanoparticles on Zn-Ni-Co layered double hydroxide (LDH) nanowires with stainless steel mesh as supporter[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2022, 294: 121148.
22	FENG Lin, LI Shuhong, LI Yingshunet al. Super-hydrophobic surfaces: From natural to artificial[J]. Advanced Materials, 2002, 14(24): 1857-1860.
23	LIU Mingjie, WANG Shutao, WEI Zhixiang, et al. Bioinspired design of a superoleophobic and low adhesive water/solid interface[J]. Advanced Materials, 2009, 21(6): 665-669.
24	WAN Xizi, JIA Lanxin, LIU Xi, et al. WET-induced layered organohydrogel as bioinspired “Sticky-Slippy skin” for robust underwater oil-repellency[J]. Advanced Materials, 2022, 34(16): 2110408.
25	Lu TIE, LI Jing, LIU Mingming, et al. Dual superlyophobic surfaces with superhydrophobicity and underwater superoleophobicity[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2018, 6(25): 11682-11687.
26	SONG Yingbin, LAI Hua, JIAO Xiaoyu, et al. Amphibious superlyophobic shape memory arrays with tunable wettability in both air and water[J]. Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials, 2022, 5(2): 788-797.
27	SAHOO Bichitra N, GUNDA Naga Siva Kumar, NANDA Sonil, et al. Development of dual-phobic surfaces: Superamphiphobicity in air and oleophobicity underwater[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2017, 5(8): 6716-6726.
28	梁雷, 王彦玲, 张杉. 超双疏含氟聚合物的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(3): 1070-1079.
	LIANG Lei, WANG Yanling, ZHANG Shan. Research progress of super-amphiphobic fluoropolymers[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(3): 1070-1079.
29	ZHANG Binbin, YAN Jiayang, LI Xuewu, et al. Self-cleaning and corrosion-resistant superamphiphobic coating with super-repellency towards low-surface-tension liquids[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2023, 23: 1094-1104.
30	ZHENG Yanjie, WANG Keli, SUN Lei, et al. Preparation of PFDTS-Kaolin/PU superamphiphobic coatings with antibacterial, antifouling and improved durability property[J]. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2022, 173: 107145.
31	程宏, 韦智元, 王涌, 等. Ni-nSiO₂纳米复合电镀制备钢基超双疏表面探究[J]. 材料保护, 2023, 56(1): 58-63.
	CHENG Hong, WEI Zhiyuan, WANG Yong, et al. Investigation of the preparation of steel-based superamphiphobic surface by Ni-nSiO₂ nanocomposite electroplating[J]. Materials Protection, 2023, 56(1): 58-63.
32	李亚斌. 环境友好水性超疏水、超双疏涂层的制备及性能研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州理工大学, 2019.
	LI Yabin. Preparation and properties of environmentally friedly waterborne superhydrophobic and superamphiphobic coatings[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University of Technology, 2019.
33	KANG Seong Min, CHOI Ji Seong, AN Joon Hyung. Reliable and robust fabrication rules for springtail-inspired superomniphobic surfaces[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2020, 12(18): 21120-21126.
34	ZHAO Xiaoxiao, PARK Daniel S, CHOI Junseo, et al. Flexible-templated imprinting for fluorine-free, omniphobic plastics with re-entrant structures[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2021, 585: 668-675.
35	SUN Jing, ZHU Pingan, YAN Xiantong, et al. Robust liquid repellency by stepwise wetting resistance[J]. Applied Physics Reviews, 2021, 8(3): 031403.
36	LIU Yang, LU Jinzhong, XUE Wei, et al. A strategy for fabricating multi-level micro-nano superamphiphobic surfaces by laser-electrochemistry subtractive-additive hybrid manufacturing method[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2023, 663: 130946.
37	TUTEJA Anish, CHOI Wonjae, MA Minglin, et al. Designing superoleophobic surfaces[J]. Science, 2007, 318(5856): 1618-1622.
38	TUTEJA Anish, CHOI Wonjae, MABRY Joseph M, et al. Robust omniphobic surfaces[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008, 105(47): 18200-18205.
39	LIU Xiaojiang, GU Hongcheng, WANG Min, et al. 3D printing of bioinspired liquid superrepellent structures[J]. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(22): 1800103.
40	LIU Tingyi “Leo”, KIM Chang-Jin “CJ”. Turning a surface superrepellent even to completely wetting liquids[J]. Science, 2014, 346(6213): 1096-1100.
41	LIU Wendong, XIANG Siyuan, LIU Xueyao, et al. Underwater superoleophobic surface based on silica hierarchical cylinder arrays with a low aspect ratio[J]. ACS Nano, 2020, 14(7): 9166-9175.
42	TAN You SIN, WANG Hao, WANG Hongtao, et al. High-throughput fabrication of large-scale metasurfaces using electron-beam lithography with SU-8 gratings for multilevel security printing[J]. Photonics Research, 2023, 11(3): B103.
43	YANG Bowen, YU Mingming, YU Haifeng. Azopolymer-based nanoimprint lithography: Recent developments in methodology and applications[J]. ChemPlusChem, 2020, 85(9): 2166-2176.
44	CHOI Hojung, KIM Joohoon, KIM Wonjoong, et al. Realization of high aspect ratio metalenses by facile nanoimprint lithography using water-soluble stamps[J]. PhotoniX, 2023, 4(1): 18.
45	GHAFFARI S, ALIOFKHAZRAEI M, BARATI DARBAND Gh, et al. Review of superoleophobic surfaces: Evaluation, fabrication methods, and industrial applications[J]. Surfaces and Interfaces, 2019, 17: 100340.
46	WANG Hujun, ZHANG Zhihui, WANG Zuankai, et al. Improved dynamic stability of superomniphobic surfaces and droplet transport on slippery surfaces by dual-scale re-entrant structures[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 394: 124871.
47	YANG Yi, ZHANG Yachao, LI Guoqiang, et al. Directional rebound of compound droplets on asymmetric self-grown tilted mushroom-like micropillars for anti-bacterial and anti-icing applications[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023, 472: 144949.
48	QI Xinyu, GAO Zhuwei, LI Chengxin, et al. Underwater superoleophobic copper mesh coated with block nano protrusion hierarchical structure for efficient oil/water separation[J]. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2023, 119: 450-460.
49	WU Mingming, SHI Guogui, LIU Weimin, et al. A universal strategy for the preparation of dual superlyophobic surfaces in oil-water systems[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2021, 13(12): 14759-14767.
50	DARBAND Ghasem Barati, ALIOFKHAZRAEI Mahmood, HYUN Suyeon, et al. Pulse electrodeposition of a superhydrophilic and binder-free Ni-Fe-P nanostructure as highly active and durable electrocatalyst for both hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2020, 12(48): 53719-53730.
51	ALTANGEREL Zolboo, Badamgarav PUREV-OCHIR, GANZORIG Anand, et al. Superhydrophobic modification and characterization of Cashmere fiber surfaces by wet coating techniques of silica nanoparticles[J]. Surfaces and Interfaces, 2020, 19: 100533.
52	GIANG Ha N, NGUYEN Truyen X, HUYNH Tien V, et al. Fabrication of superhydrophobic surface using one-step chemical treatment[J]. Surfaces and Interfaces, 2020, 21: 100673.
53	DUFOUR Renaud, PERRY Guillaume, HARNOIS Maxime, et al. From micro to nano reentrant structures: Hysteresis on superomniphobic surfaces[J]. Colloid and Polymer Science, 2013, 291(2): 409-415.
54	HENSEL René, FINN Andreas, HELBIG Ralf, et al. Biologically inspired omniphobic surfaces by reverse imprint lithography[J]. Advanced Materials, 2014, 26(13): 2029-2033.
55	WANG Shuijing, LI Hongdou, XIA Rong, et al. Scalable nanofabrication of T-shape nanopillars based on polystyrene/polyphenylsilsequioxane films showing broadband antireflection and super-omniphobicity[J]. ACS Applied Nano Materials, 2022, 5(3): 3973-3982.
56	LIAO Dong, HE Minghao, QIU Huihe. High-performance icephobic droplet rebound surface with nanoscale doubly reentrant structure[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 133: 341-351.
57	ZHANG Zhonggang, PEI Guangyao, ZHAO Keli, et al. Fresnel diffraction strategy enables the fabrication of flexible superomniphobic surfaces[J]. Langmuir, 2022, 38(47): 14508-14516.
58	KANG Seong Min, AN Joon Hyung. Robust and transparent lossless directional omniphobic ultra-thin sticker-type film with re-entrant micro-stripe arrays[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2022, 14(34): 39646-39653.
59	DONG Shilian, ZHANG Xiaolei, LI Qian, et al. Springtail-inspired superamphiphobic ordered nanohoodoo arrays with quasi-doubly reentrant structures[J]. Small, 2020, 16(19): 2000779.
60	SONG Jinlong, PAN Weihao, WANG Kang, et al. Fabrication of micro-reentrant structures by liquid/gas interface shape-regulated electrochemical deposition[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2020, 159: 103637.
61	KANG Seong Min, KIM Hyunjung, CHOI Ji Seong, et al. Bioinspired omniphobic microchamber structure[J]. Advanced Materials Interfaces, 2021, 8(12): 2100027.
62	KIM Do Hyeog, KIM Seok, PARK Seo Rim, et al. Shape-deformed mushroom-like reentrant structures for robust liquid-repellent surfaces[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2021, 13(28): 33618-33626.
63	KIM Hyunjung, KIM Hong Nam, KANG Seong Min. Robust fabrication of double-ring mushroom structure for reliable omniphobic surfaces[J]. Surfaces and Interfaces, 2022, 29: 101778.
64	ZHU Ping’an, KONG Tiantian, ZHOU Chunmei, et al. Engineering microstructure with evaporation-induced self-assembly of microdroplets[J]. Small Methods, 2018, 2(6): 1800017.
65	ZHU Ping’an, KONG Tiantian, TANG Xin, et al. Well-defined porous membranes for robust omniphobic surfaces via microfluidic emulsion templating[J]. Nature Communications, 2017, 8: 15823.
66	LI Haojun, JIN Qingqing, LI Haibo, et al. Transparent superamphiphobic material formed by hierarchical nano re-entrant structure[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2024, 34(3): 2309684.
67	Maesoon IM, Hown IM, LEE Joo-Hyung, et al. A robust superhydrophobic and superoleophobic surface with inverse-trapezoidal microstructures on a large transparent flexible substrate[J]. Soft Matter, 2010, 6(7): 1401-1404.
68	LEE Sanghee, KIM Wuseok, Changyong YIM, et al. Growth of hierarchical gold clusters for use in superomniphobic electrodes[J]. RSC Advances, 2019, 9(2): 761-765.
69	WONG William S Y, LIU Guanyu, NASIRI Noushin, et al. Omnidirectional self-assembly of transparent superoleophobic nanotextures[J]. ACS Nano, 2017, 11(1): 587-596.
70	KANG Seong Min, CHOI Ji Seong. Selective liquid sliding surfaces with springtail-inspired concave mushroom-like micropillar arrays[J]. Small, 2020, 16(3): 1904612.

类型	原理	制备途径	优势	局限性	特定用途
液下超双疏	水中超疏油、油中超疏水。在水中需要较高的表面能，能够亲水；在油中需要较低的表面能，能够亲油	通过外界刺激改变表面化学性质或构筑特殊微/纳粗糙结构	可通过预润湿来按需进行油水分离，实现多相有机液体分离，无需外部能量	刺激响应性聚合物结构在润湿性转变过程中容易被破坏，实际应用中成本较高	油水分离，相转移催化，燃料净，微流体装置
空气超疏水/水下超疏油	暴露在空气和水界面，在空气中需要较低的表面能，在水下需要较高的表面能	调节粗糙结构	通过在不同介质中疏液效果的不同来达到高效的油水分离	寿命周期短	油水分离
空气超双疏	在空气界面既具有超疏水性又具有超疏油性	在微纳结构中引入氟硅烷或仿生构建重入结构	其出色的超疏液性能，在防污防结冰方面相对于超疏水表面提升明显	含氟类物质使用较多，环境污染较为严重，制备工艺较复杂	输油管道防污，防结冰

类型	原理	制备途径	优势	局限性	特定用途
液下超双疏	水中超疏油、油中超疏水。在水中需要较高的表面能，能够亲水；在油中需要较低的表面能，能够亲油	通过外界刺激改变表面化学性质或构筑特殊微/纳粗糙结构	可通过预润湿来按需进行油水分离，实现多相有机液体分离，无需外部能量	刺激响应性聚合物结构在润湿性转变过程中容易被破坏，实际应用中成本较高	油水分离，相转移催化，燃料净，微流体装置
空气超疏水/水下超疏油	暴露在空气和水界面，在空气中需要较低的表面能，在水下需要较高的表面能	调节粗糙结构	通过在不同介质中疏液效果的不同来达到高效的油水分离	寿命周期短	油水分离
空气超双疏	在空气界面既具有超疏水性又具有超疏油性	在微纳结构中引入氟硅烷或仿生构建重入结构	其出色的超疏液性能，在防污防结冰方面相对于超疏水表面提升明显	含氟类物质使用较多，环境污染较为严重，制备工艺较复杂	输油管道防污，防结冰

方法制备	重入结构	优点	缺点	超双疏性		油	结构稳定性	参考文献
方法制备	重入结构	优点	缺点	WCA	OCA	油	结构稳定性	参考文献
3D激光写入	锥形柱蘑菇形	分辨率高，易于制造，具有精确的几何形状	要求材料具有敏感性，存在高分辨率与大尺寸之间的矛盾	>150°	>150°	花生油	稳定性较好	[35,60,62]
掩膜光刻	T形双重蘑菇形	形状易于控制，结构制备成本低	存在形貌与尺寸之间的矛盾	>150°	>150°	十六烷	T形，双重稳定性较差，蘑菇形稳定性较好	[55,57,63]
压印光刻	倒梯形	分辨率高，结构制备成本低，产量高	重入形状有限，难以制造分层重入	>150°	≈135°	甲醇	稳定性较好	[67]
胶体光刻	T形蘑菇形	结构制备成本低，产量高	重入形状有限	>150°	>150°	十六烷	T形稳定性较差，蘑菇形稳定性较好	[53,61]
反应刻蚀	双重	结构制备成本低	操作复杂，重入形状有限	>150°	>150°	十六烷	稳定性较差	[56,58-59]
微流体	倒梯形	结构制备成本低，可扩展生产	制备材料有限，重入形状有限	>150°	≈94.8°	十六烷	稳定性较好	[64-65]
软模板	T形倒梯形	形貌和几何形状易于控制，结构制备成本低	依赖模板，材料有限	>150°	>150°	十二烷	T形稳定性较差，倒梯形稳定性较好	[54,66]

方法制备	重入结构	优点	缺点	超双疏性		油	结构稳定性	参考文献
方法制备	重入结构	优点	缺点	WCA	OCA	油	结构稳定性	参考文献
3D激光写入	锥形柱蘑菇形	分辨率高，易于制造，具有精确的几何形状	要求材料具有敏感性，存在高分辨率与大尺寸之间的矛盾	>150°	>150°	花生油	稳定性较好	[35,60,62]
掩膜光刻	T形双重蘑菇形	形状易于控制，结构制备成本低	存在形貌与尺寸之间的矛盾	>150°	>150°	十六烷	T形，双重稳定性较差，蘑菇形稳定性较好	[55,57,63]
压印光刻	倒梯形	分辨率高，结构制备成本低，产量高	重入形状有限，难以制造分层重入	>150°	≈135°	甲醇	稳定性较好	[67]
胶体光刻	T形蘑菇形	结构制备成本低，产量高	重入形状有限	>150°	>150°	十六烷	T形稳定性较差，蘑菇形稳定性较好	[53,61]
反应刻蚀	双重	结构制备成本低	操作复杂，重入形状有限	>150°	>150°	十六烷	稳定性较差	[56,58-59]
微流体	倒梯形	结构制备成本低，可扩展生产	制备材料有限，重入形状有限	>150°	≈94.8°	十六烷	稳定性较好	[64-65]
软模板	T形倒梯形	形貌和几何形状易于控制，结构制备成本低	依赖模板，材料有限	>150°	>150°	十二烷	T形稳定性较差，倒梯形稳定性较好	[54,66]

[1]	张洋, 张艺洁, 张鸿志, 钱懋林, 向静. 甲基红对电沉积铜行为的影响及在通孔填性中的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(3): 1542-1549.
[2]	白依冉, 翟玉玲, 戴晶慧, 李舟航. 微纳尺度池沸腾表面润湿性的气泡成核及强化传热机制[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(2): 743-751.
[3]	靳钰阳, 牛传峰, 刘英硕, 丁石. 石墨粉/Nafion-铅复合电极电还原草酸制乙醇酸[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(2): 1003-1013.
[4]	银了飞, 杨钟琳, 张坷昕, 张志强, 党超. 开放型微通道内低表面张力工质SF-33过冷流动沸腾换热[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(2): 764-772.
[5]	谢钰麟, 饶瑞晔, 黄建, 蒿佳怡, 王友益, 黄琦. 连续ZIF-8膜制备及在氢气分离中的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(S1): 403-418.
[6]	李颖, 王其召, 白波, 张茜, 孙文静, 张琳璇. 表面Janus图案结构的单向导水集雾性能[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(9): 5133-5141.
[7]	李浩然, 王岩, 张涛, 吕莉, 唐文翔, 唐盛伟. 以Cu(Ac)₂-Zn(Ac)₂溶液为水相的W/O微液滴尺度的有效调控[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(9): 5168-5176.
[8]	孙燕, 谢晓阳, 冯倩颖, 郑璐, 何皎洁, 杨利伟, 白波. 基于单宁酸-铁(Ⅲ)改性正渗透膜制备及抗污染性能[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(9): 5309-5319.
[9]	宋家恺, 孔令真, 陈家庆, 孙欢, 李奇, 李长河, 王思诚, 孔标. 脱液型管式气液分离器旋流分离段内液膜流动和分离特性[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(8): 4297-4306.
[10]	王嘉, 李文翠, 吴凡, 高新芊, 陆安慧. NiMo/Al₂O₃催化剂活性组分分布调控及其加氢脱硫应用[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(8): 4393-4402.
[11]	李莉, 蔡鑫宇, 陈寅杰, 张文启, 李光辉, 饶品华. 超疏水-高疏油SiC膜的制备及性能[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(8): 4516-4522.
[12]	李文哲, 申淼, 王建强. 熔盐法制备新型二维层状金属碳/氮化物(MXene)的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(7): 3660-3671.
[13]	黄坤, 许明, 吴秀娟, 裴思佳, 刘大伟, 马晓迅, 徐龙. 生物质活性炭的制备与微结构特性调控研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(5): 2475-2493.
[14]	苗诒贺, 王耀祖, 刘雨杭, 朱炫灿, 李佳, 于立军. 添加剂改性固态胺吸附剂用于碳捕集的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(5): 2739-2759.
[15]	黄梦, 孙志高, 徐文超, 张焕然, 杨扬. 内酯型槐糖脂促进HCFC-141b水合物生成[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(3): 1199-1205.