3D打印催化材料开发与应用进展

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-0150

化工进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 3956-3964.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-0150

3D打印催化材料开发与应用进展

吴海波¹^,²(), 王希仑², 方岩雄¹, 纪红兵²^,³()

^1.广东工业大学轻工化工学院，广东广州 510006
^2.中山大学惠州研究院，广东惠州 516081
^3.浙江工业大学化学工程学院，浙江绿色石化与轻烃转化研究院，浙江杭州 310014

收稿日期:2023-02-07 修回日期:2023-07-01 出版日期:2023-08-15 发布日期:2023-09-19
通讯作者: 纪红兵
作者简介:吴海波（1985—），男，博士研究生，高级工程师，研究方向为结构化催化剂。E-mail：wu.haibo08@163.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划“纳米科技”重点专项(2020YFA0210900);广东省“珠江人才计划”本土创新科研团队项目(2017BT01C102);先进能源科学与技术广东省实验室团队项目(DJLTF0410);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(2022A1515140008)

Progress of the development and application of 3D printing catalyst

WU Haibo¹^,²(), WANG Xilun², FANG Yanxiong¹, JI Hongbing²^,³()

^1.Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Light Industry, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, China
^2.Huizhou Research Institute of Sun Sat-sen University, Huizhou 516081, Guangdong，China
^3.Institute of Green Petroleum Processing and Light Hydrocarbon Conversion, College of Chemical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, Zhejiang, China

Received:2023-02-07 Revised:2023-07-01 Online:2023-08-15 Published:2023-09-19
Contact: JI Hongbing

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

与传统制备技术相比，3D打印技术在材料制备方面具有低成本、精度高和结构可控等优势，这使得3D打印技术在催化领域受到了广泛的关注。本文介绍了催化材料3D打印技术的最新进展，包括熔融沉积、光固化技术、直接墨水书写和选择性激光烧结技术。并对基于3D打印的聚合物、碳基材料、金属及氧化物基等材料在催化领域的应用进行了综述。文中指出，3D打印技术为催化剂的制备提供了一种新的途径，但在催化剂制备和应用方面仍存在打印速度慢、材料物理化学性质不稳定和使用范围受限等不足。本文提出了在材料种类拓展、催化剂结构优化、新型打印机与表面涂层技术研发等方面的未来发展方向。

关键词: 3D打印, 催化剂, 制备, 催化(作用)

Abstract:

Compared with traditional catalyst preparation techniques, 3D printing has been gathered much attention due to the advantages of low cost, high accuracy and controllable structures. Recent progress of 3D printing technology in catalytic materials was introduced in this paper, including fused deposition modeling, stereo lithography appearance, direct ink writing and selective laser sintering. The catalytic applications of polymer, carbon-based materials, metal and oxide-based materials prepared by 3D printing techniques were reviewed. 3D printing provides a new catalyst preparation way, but there were still shortcomings in the preparation and application, such as slow printing speed, unstable physical and chemical properties of materials, and limited application field. The directions for future development such as expanding material types, optimizing catalyst structures, new printers and surface coating technologies were proposed.

Key words: 3D printing, catalyst, preparation, catalysis

中图分类号:

TQ426

吴海波, 王希仑, 方岩雄, 纪红兵. 3D打印催化材料开发与应用进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3956-3964.

WU Haibo, WANG Xilun, FANG Yanxiong, JI Hongbing. Progress of the development and application of 3D printing catalyst[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(8): 3956-3964.

图/表 6

参考文献 47

1	YUAN Zijian, LIU Lu, RU Wei, et al. 3D printed hierarchical spinel monolithic catalysts for highly efficient semi-hydrogenation of acetylene[J]. Nano Research, 2022, 15(7): 6010-6018.
2	CENTI Gabriele, PERATHONER Siglinda. Novel catalyst design for multiphase reactions[J]. Catalysis Today, 2003, 79/80: 3-13.
3	ZHU Jie, WU Peiwen, CHAO Yanhong, et al. Recent advances in 3D printing for catalytic applications[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 433: 134341.
4	ROBBINS Spencer W, Sai Hiroaki, DISALVO Francis J, et al. Monolithic gyroidal mesoporous mixed titanium-niobium nitrides[J]. ACS Nano, 2014, 8(8): 8217-8223.
5	SUN Fang, Jean-Rene ELLA-MENYE, GALVAN Daniel David, et al. Stealth surface modification of surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrates for sensitive and accurate detection in protein solutions[J]. ACS Nano, 2015, 9(3): 2668-2676.
6	GU Zhanjun, Parans PARANTHAMAN M, XU Jun, et al. Aligned ZnO nanorod arrays grown directly on zinc foils and zinc spheres by a low-temperature oxidization method[J]. ACS Nano, 2009, 3(2): 273-278.
7	Jessica CAMPOS-DELGADO, ROMO-HERRERA José Manuel, JIA Xiaoting, et al. Bulk production of a new form of sp² carbon: Crystalline graphene nanoribbons[J]. Nano Letters, 2008, 8(9): 2773-2778.
8	LI Zuojiang, DEL CUL Guillermo D, YAN Wenfu, et al. Fluorinated carbon with ordered mesoporous structure[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2004, 126(40): 12782-12783.
9	ZHOU Xintong, ZHANG Quan, LIU Changjun. Templated synthesis of urchin-like zinc oxide particles by micro-combustion[J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2014, 8(1): 73-78.
10	CHAI Geun Seok, YOON Suk Bon, YU Jong-Sung, et al. Ordered porous carbons with tunable pore sizes as catalyst supports in direct methanol fuel cell[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2004, 108(22): 7074-7079.
11	王雪莹. 3D打印技术与产业的发展及前景分析[J]. 中国高新技术企业, 2012(26): 3-5.
	WANG Xueying. Development and prospect analysis of 3D printing technology and industry[J]. China High-Tech Enterprises, 2012(26): 3-5.
12	Cesar PARRA-CABRERA, ACHILLE Clement, KUHN Simon, et al. 3D printing in chemical engineering and catalytic technology: Structured catalysts, mixers and reactors[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2018, 47(1): 209-230.
13	HALDORAI Yuvaraj, SHIM Jae-Jin. Fabrication of metal oxide-polymer hybrid nanocomposites[J]. Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Nanomaterials, 2015, 267: 249-281.
14	WENDEL Bettina, RIETZEL Dominik, Florian KÜHNLEIN, et al. Additive processing of polymers[J]. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 2008, 293(10): 799-809.
15	CRIVELLO James V, REICHMANIS Elsa. Photopolymer materials and processes for advanced technologies[J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2014, 26(1): 533-548.
16	LAM C X F, MO X M, TEOH S H, et al. Scaffold development using 3D printing with a starch-based polymer[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2002, 20(1/2): 49-56.
17	KOEGLER Wendy S, GRIFFITH Linda G. Osteoblast response to PLGA tissue engineering scaffolds with PEO modified surface chemistries and demonstration of patterned cell response[J]. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(14): 2819-2830.
18	TAY B Y, ZHANG S X, MYINT M H, et al. Processing of polycaprolactone porous structure for scaffold development[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2007, 182(1/2/3): 117-121.
19	PENG Zhonghua. Rational synthesis of covalently bonded organic-inorganic hybrids[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2004, 43(8): 930-935.
20	HONG J I, WINBERG P, SCHADLER L S, et al. Dielectric properties of zinc oxide/low density polyethylene nanocomposites[J]. Materials Letters, 2005, 59(4): 473-476.
21	LEE Jinhong, Kyung-Hee KO, PARK Byung-Ok. Electrical and optical properties of ZnO transparent conducting films by the sol-gel method[J]. Journal of Crystal Growth, 2003, 247(1/2): 119-125.
22	ZOU Hua, WU Shishan, SHEN Jian. Polymer/silica nanocomposites: Preparation, characterization, properties, and applications[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2008, 108(9): 3893-3957
23	DEMIR Mustafa M, CASTIGNOLLES Patrice, Ümit AKBEY, et al. In-situ bulk polymerization of dilute particle/MMA dispersions[J]. Macromolecules, 2007, 40(12): 4190-4198.
24	KAHN M L, MONGE M, COLLIÈRE V, et al. Size- and shape-control of crystalline zinc oxide nanoparticles: A new organometallic synthetic method[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2005, 15(3): 458-468.
25	MIYAUCHI Masahiro, LI Yongjin, SHIMIZU Hiroshi. Enhanced degradation in nanocomposites of TiO₂ and biodegradable polymer[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(12): 4551-4554.
26	YUNG Winco K C, SUN Bo, HUANG Junfeng, et al. Photochemical copper coating on 3D printed thermoplastics[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 31188.
27	SHI Zhennan, XU Chen, CHEN Fei, et al. Renewable metal-organic-frameworks-coated 3D printing film for removal of malachite green[J]. RSC Advances, 2017, 7(79): 49947-49952.
28	CASTLES F, ISAKOV D, LUI A, et al. Microwave dielectric characterisation of 3D-printed BaTiO₃/ABS polymer composites[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 22714.
29	SKORSKI Matthew R, ESENTHER Jake M, AHMED Zeeshan, et al. The chemical, mechanical, and physical properties of 3D printed materials composed of TiO₂-ABS nanocomposites[J]. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 2016, 17(1): 89-97.
30	FANTINO Erika, CHIAPPONE Annalisa, ROPPOLO Ignazio, et al. 3D printing of conductive complex structures with in situ generation of silver nanoparticles[J]. Advanced Materials, 2016, 28(19): 3712-3717.
31	MICHORCZYK P, HĘDRZAK E, WĘGRZYNIAK A. Preparation of monolithic catalysts using 3D printed templates for oxidative coupling of methane[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2016, 4(48): 18753-18756.
32	LIANG Chengdu, XIE Hong, SCHWARTZ Viviane, et al. Open-cage fullerene-like graphitic carbons as catalysts for oxidative dehydrogenation of isobutane[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009, 131(22): 7735-7741.
33	Kyoung-Su HA, KWAK Geunjae, Ki-Won JUN, et al. Ordered mesoporous carbon nanochannel reactors for high-performance Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. Chemical Communications, 2013, 49(45): 5141-5143.
34	MIDDELKOOP Vesna, SLATER Thomas, FLOREA Mihaela, et al. Next frontiers in cleaner synthesis: 3D printed graphene-supported CeZrLa mixed-oxide nanocatalyst for CO₂ utilisation and direct propylene carbonate production[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 214: 606-614.
35	WANG Zongyuan, LIU Changjun. Preparation and application of iron oxide/graphene based composites for electrochemical energy storage and energy conversion devices: Current status and perspective[J]. Nano Energy, 2015, 11: 277-293.
36	ZHOU Xintong, LIU Changjun. Three-dimensional printing for catalytic applications: Current status and perspectives[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2017, 27(30): 1701134.
37	MORENO-CASTILLA C, MALDONADO-HÓDAR F J. Carbon aerogels for catalysis applications: An overview[J]. Carbon, 2005, 43(3): 455-465.
38	ZHU Cheng, LIU Tianyu, QIAN Fang, et al. Supercapacitors based on three-dimensional hierarchical graphene aerogels with periodic macropores[J]. Nano Letters, 2016, 16(6): 3448-3456.
39	RAMBO Carlos R, TRAVITZKY Nahum, GREIL Peter. Conductive TiC/Ti-Cu/C composites fabricated by Ti-Cu alloy reactive infiltration into 3D-printed carbon performs[J]. Journal of Composite Materials, 2015, 49(16): 1971-1976.
40	FRAZIER William E. Metal additive manufacturing: A review[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2014, 23(6): 1917-1928.
41	QUAN Haoyuan, ZHANG Ting, XU Hang, et al. Photo-curing 3D printing technique and its challenges[J]. Bioactive Materials, 2020, 5(1): 110-115.
42	BAENA-MORENO Francisco M, Miriam GONZÁLEZ-CASTAÑO, NAVARRO DE MIGUEL Juan Carlos, et al. Stepping toward efficient microreactors for CO₂ methanation: 3D-printed gyroid geometry[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2021, 9(24): 8198-8206.
43	ELKHATAT Ahmed M, AL-MUHTASEB Shaheen A. Advances in tailoring resorcinol-formaldehyde organic and carbon gels[J]. Advanced Materials, 2011, 23(26): 2887-2903.
44	WAN Ying, SHI Yifeng, ZHAO Dongyuan. Supramolecular aggregates as templates: Ordered mesoporous polymers and carbons[J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2008, 20(3): 932-945.
45	FARAHANI Rouhollah D, Martine DUBÉ, THERRIAULT Daniel. Three-dimensional printing of multifunctional nanocomposites: Manufacturing techniques and applications[J]. Advanced Materials, 2016, 28(28): 5794-5821.
46	TAYLOR Shannon L, JAKUS Adam E, SHAH Ramille N, et al. Iron and nickel cellular structures by sintering of 3D-printed oxide or metallic particle inks[J]. Advanced Engineering Materials,2017, 19(11):1600365.
47	TUBÍO Carmen R, AZUAJE Jhonny, ESCALANTE Luz, et al. 3D printing of a heterogeneous copper-based catalyst[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2016, 334: 110-115.

方法	催化剂/材料	优点	缺点
熔融沉积成型（FDM）	聚合物PLA、ABS	成本低、材料利用率高	精度低、打印速度慢
光固化（SLA）	光敏树脂	精度较高	价格偏高
直接墨水书写（DIW）	陶瓷、碳材料等	成本低、操作简单	增加后处理
选择性激光烧结（SLS）	ABS、蜡	工艺简单，韧性好	费用较高、易变形

方法	催化剂/材料	优点	缺点
熔融沉积成型（FDM）	聚合物PLA、ABS	成本低、材料利用率高	精度低、打印速度慢
光固化（SLA）	光敏树脂	精度较高	价格偏高
直接墨水书写（DIW）	陶瓷、碳材料等	成本低、操作简单	增加后处理
选择性激光烧结（SLS）	ABS、蜡	工艺简单，韧性好	费用较高、易变形

[1]	张明焱, 刘燕, 张雪婷, 刘亚科, 李从举, 张秀玲. 非贵金属双功能催化剂在锌空气电池研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 276-286.
[2]	时永兴, 林刚, 孙晓航, 蒋韦庚, 乔大伟, 颜彬航. 二氧化碳加氢制甲醇过程中铜基催化剂活性位点研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 287-298.
[3]	谢璐垚, 陈崧哲, 王来军, 张平. 用于SO₂去极化电解制氢的铂基催化剂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 299-309.
[4]	杨霞珍, 彭伊凡, 刘化章, 霍超. 熔铁催化剂活性相的调控及其费托反应性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 310-318.
[5]	王乐乐, 杨万荣, 姚燕, 刘涛, 何川, 刘逍, 苏胜, 孔凡海, 朱仓海, 向军. SCR脱硝催化剂掺废特性及性能影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 489-497.
[6]	邓丽萍, 时好雨, 刘霄龙, 陈瑶姬, 严晶颖. 非贵金属改性钒钛基催化剂NH₃-SCR脱硝协同控制VOCs[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 542-548.
[7]	程涛, 崔瑞利, 宋俊男, 张天琪, 张耘赫, 梁世杰, 朴实. 渣油加氢装置杂质沉积规律与压降升高机理分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4616-4627.
[8]	王鹏, 史会兵, 赵德明, 冯保林, 陈倩, 杨妲. 过渡金属催化氯代物的羰基化反应研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4649-4666.
[9]	高彦静. 单原子催化技术国际研究态势分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4667-4676.
[10]	张启, 赵红, 荣峻峰. 质子交换膜燃料电池中氧还原反应抗毒性电催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4677-4691.
[11]	王伟涛, 鲍婷玉, 姜旭禄, 何珍红, 王宽, 杨阳, 刘昭铁. 醛酮树脂基非金属催化剂催化氧气氧化苯制备苯酚[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4706-4715.
[12]	葛亚粉, 孙宇, 肖鹏, 刘琦, 刘波, 孙成蓥, 巩雁军. 分子筛去除VOCs的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4716-4730.
[13]	向阳, 黄寻, 魏子栋. 电催化有机合成反应的活性和选择性调控研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4005-4014.
[14]	王耀刚, 韩子姗, 高嘉辰, 王新宇, 李思琪, 杨全红, 翁哲. 铜基催化剂电还原二氧化碳选择性的调控策略[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4043-4057.
[15]	刘毅, 房强, 钟达忠, 赵强, 李晋平. Ag/Cu耦合催化剂的Cu晶面调控用于电催化二氧化碳还原[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4136-4142.

3D打印催化材料开发与应用进展

Progress of the development and application of 3D printing catalyst

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 47

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价