一体化生物加工CBP产纤维乙醇研究进展

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-2169

化工进展 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12): 6873-6882.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-2169

• 生物与医药化工 • 上一篇

一体化生物加工CBP产纤维乙醇研究进展

徐凯¹^,²^,³(), 崔金娜¹^,²^,³, 刘占英¹^,²^,³()

^1.内蒙古自治区发酵产业节能减排工程技术研究中心，内蒙古呼和浩特 010051
^2.生物发酵绿色制造内蒙古自治区工程研究中心，内蒙古呼和浩特 010051
^3.内蒙古工业大学化工学院，内蒙古呼和浩特 010051

收稿日期:2023-12-08 修回日期:2024-04-04 出版日期:2024-12-15 发布日期:2025-01-11
通讯作者: 刘占英
作者简介:徐凯（2000—），男，硕士研究生，研究方向为生物化工。E-mail：xukain@163.com。
基金资助:
内蒙古杰出青年基金(2022JQ10);内蒙古自治区“草原英才”工程产业创新人才团队项目

Research progress in the production of cellulosic ethanol via consolidated bioprocessing

XU Kai¹^,²^,³(), CUI Jinna¹^,²^,³, LIU Zhanying¹^,²^,³()

^1.Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Fermentation Industry Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction Engineering Technology Research Center, Hohhot 010051, Inner Mongolia, China
^2.Biological Fermentation Green Manufacturing Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Engineering Research Center, Hohhot 010051, Inner Mongolia, China
^3.School of Chemical Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010051, Inner Mongolia, China

Received:2023-12-08 Revised:2024-04-04 Online:2024-12-15 Published:2025-01-11
Contact: LIU Zhanying

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

全球能源危机的升级使得开发可再生替代燃料变得更加迫切。一体化生物加工（consolidated bioprocessing，CBP）是一项整合了预处理、纤维素酶生产、纤维素水解糖化、己糖和戊糖发酵产醇四个单元操作为一体的生物加工技术，是降解木质纤维素生物质产纤维素乙醇最具前景的高效低成本策略。本文以细菌和真菌在CBP产纤维素乙醇中的研究为出发点，回顾了纤维素乙醇工业化的发展历程。综述了一体化生物加工技术中四种不同的策略，包括单菌CBP系统、自然微生物菌群、组合微生物群落、菌种代谢工程改造，系统总结了目前国内外报道的CBP底盘细菌与真菌的种类、发酵代谢特征及工程化和共培养策略，并论述了研究案例和发展现状。为新型功能菌株的选育和非粮生物燃料的发展提供理论依据。

关键词: 一体化生物加工, 纤维素乙醇, 微生物菌群, 生物燃料, 生物质, 合成生物学

Abstract:

The escalation of the global energy crisis has made the development of renewable alternative fuels even more urgent. Consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) is a bioprocessing technology that integrates pre-treatment, cellulase production, cellulose hydrolysis and saccharification, and hexose and pentose fermentation to produce ethanol. It is the most promising and efficient low-cost strategy for degrading lignocellulosic biomass to produce cellulose ethanol. Starting from the research on bacteria and fungi in the production of cellulose ethanol from CBP, this article reviews the development process of cellulose ethanol industrialization. This article expounds four different strategies in the consolidated bioprocessing process, including single bacterial CBP system, natural microbial community, composite microbial community, and microbial metabolic engineering transformation. It systematically summarizes the types, fermentation metabolic characteristics, and engineering and co-cultivation strategies of CBP chassis bacteria and fungi reported in domestic and foreign literature, and discusses their research cases and development status. This article provides theoretical basis for the breeding of new functional strains and the development of non-grain biofuels.

Key words: consolidated bioprocessing, cellulosic ethanol, microbial microbiota, biofuels, biomass, synthetic biology

中图分类号:

徐凯, 崔金娜, 刘占英. 一体化生物加工CBP产纤维乙醇研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(12): 6873-6882.

XU Kai, CUI Jinna, LIU Zhanying. Research progress in the production of cellulosic ethanol via consolidated bioprocessing[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024, 43(12): 6873-6882.

图/表 5

参考文献 52

1	PERIYASAMY Selvakumar, BEULA Isabel J, KAVITHA S, et al. Recent advances in consolidated bioprocessing for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into bioethanol—A review[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023, 453: 139783.
2	DU Ran, YAN Jianbin, LI Shizhong, et al. Cellulosic ethanol production by natural bacterial consortia is enhanced by Pseudoxanthomonas taiwanensis [J]. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2015, 8(1): 10.
3	Edgar OLGUIN-MACIEL, Alfonso LARQUÉ-SAAVEDRA, LAPPE-OLIVERAS Patricia E, et al. Consolidated bioprocess for bioethanol production from raw flour of Brosimum alicastrum seeds using the native strain of Trametes hirsuta Bm-2[J]. Microorganisms, 2019, 7(11): 483.
4	YAN Qiang, FONG Stephen S. Challenges and advances for genetic engineering of non-model bacteria and uses in consolidated bioprocessing[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2017, 8: 2060.
5	SINGHANIA Reeta Rani, PATEL Anil Kumar, SINGH Anusuiya, et al. Consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulosic biomass: Technological advances and challenges[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2022, 354: 127153.
6	Edgar OLGUIN-MACIEL, SINGH Anusuiya, Rubi CHABLE-VILLACIS, et al. Consolidated bioprocessing, an innovative strategy towards sustainability for biofuels production from crop residues: An overview[J]. Agronomy, 2020, 10(11): 1834.
7	PARISUTHAM Vinuselvi, KIM Tae Hyun, LEE Sung Kuk. Feasibilities of consolidated bioprocessing microbes: From pretreatment to biofuel production[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 161: 431-440.
8	CHINN Mari, MBANEME Veronica. Consolidated bioprocessing for biofuel production: Recent advances[J]. Energy and Emission Control Technologies, 2015: 23.
9	TANIMURA Ayumi, KIKUKAWA Minako, YAMAGUCHI Shino, et al. Direct ethanol production from starch using a natural isolate, Scheffersomyces shehatae: Toward consolidated bioprocessing[J]. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5: 9593.
10	OKAMOTO Kenji, NITTA Yasuyuki, MAEKAWA Nitaro, et al. Direct ethanol production from starch, wheat bran and rice straw by the white rot fungus Trametes hirsuta [J]. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2011, 48(3): 273-277.
11	ZERVA A, SAVVIDES A L, KATSIFAS E A, et al. Evaluation of Paecilomyces variotii potential in bioethanol production from lignocellulose through consolidated bioprocessing[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2014, 162: 294-299.
12	JIN Mingjie, BALAN Venkatesh, GUNAWAN Christa, et al. Consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) performance of Clostridium phytofermentans on AFEX-treated corn stover for ethanol production[J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2011, 108(6): 1290-1297.
13	SINGH Nisha, MATHUR Anshu S, GUPTA Ravi P, et al. Enhanced cellulosic ethanol production via consolidated bioprocessing by Clostridium thermocellum ATCC 31924[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 250: 860-867.
14	许从峰, 张方政, 张伟, 等. 合成微生物群落用于木质纤维素生物质转化的研究进展[J]. 微生物学通报, 2020, 47(10): 3431-3441.
	XU Congfeng, ZHANG Fangzheng, ZHANG Wei, et al. Synthetic microbial consortia for lignocellulosic biomass conversion[J]. Microbiology China, 2020, 47(10): 3431-3441.
15	VERSTRAETE W, WITTEBOLLE L, HEYLEN K, et al. Microbial resource management: The road to go for environmental biotechnology[J]. Engineering in Life Sciences, 2007, 7(2): 117-126.
16	MARZORATI Massimo, WITTEBOLLE Lieven, BOON Nico, et al. How to get more out of molecular fingerprints: Practical tools for microbial ecology[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2008, 10(6): 1571-1581.
17	KINET R, DESTAIN J, HILIGSMANN S, et al. Thermophilic and cellulolytic consortium isolated from composting plants improves anaerobic digestion of cellulosic biomass: Toward a microbial resource management approach[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 189: 138-144.
18	GAO Zhaoming, XU Xun, RUAN Lingwei. Enrichment and characterization of an anaerobic cellulolytic microbial consortium SQD-1.1 from mangrove soil[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2014, 98(1): 465-474.
19	ZHAO Chao, DENG Yunjin, WANG Xingna, et al. Identification and characterization of an anaerobic ethanol-producing cellulolytic bacterial consortium from Great Basin hot springs with agricultural residues and energy crops[J]. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2014, 24(9): 1280-1290.
20	刘建斌, 武凤霞, 张淑彬, 等. 高温纤维素分解菌群PN-8的筛选及微生物组成研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(35): 50-56.
	LIU Jianbin, WU Fengxia, ZHANG Shubin, et al. Screening and microbial component of a thermophilic, cellulose-degradation bacterial community PN-8[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(35): 50-56.
21	Idania VALDEZ-VAZQUEZ, Marisol PÉREZ-RANGEL, TAPIA Adán, et al. Hydrogen and butanol production from native wheat straw by synthetic microbial consortia integrated by species of Enterococcus and Clostridium [J]. Fuel, 2015, 159: 214-222.
22	LI Junfeng, WU Yongjie, ZHAO Jie, et al. Bioaugmented degradation of rice straw combining two novel microbial consortia and lactic acid bacteria for enhancing the methane production[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2022, 344: 126148.
23	ZUROFF Trevor R, XIQUES Salvador Barri, CURTIS Wayne R. Consortia-mediated bioprocessing of cellulose to ethanol with a symbiotic Clostridium phytofermentans/yeast co-culture[J]. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2013, 6(1): 59.
24	庞建, 刘占英, 郝敏, 等. 添加稀土离子提高嗜热梭菌发酵微晶纤维素生产乙醇的产率[J]. 稀土, 2016, 37(3): 134-139.
	PANG Jian, LIU Zhanying, HAO Min, et al. Rare earth ions improve yield of ethanol produced with C. thermocellum on avicel[J]. Chinese Rare Earths, 2016, 37(3): 134-139.
25	XIE Zhijie, MENG Xianghui, DING Hongxia, et al. The synergistic effect of rumen cellulolytic bacteria and activated carbon on thermophilic digestion of cornstalk[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2021, 338: 125566.
26	HE Qiang, HEMME Christopher L, JIANG Helong, et al. Mechanisms of enhanced cellulosic bioethanol fermentation by co-cultivation of Clostridium and Thermoanaerobacter spp[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(20): 9586-9592.
27	Hongyi LYU, CHEN Jing, WANG Mengyi, et al. Recycling cinder in efficient methane production from wheat straw via solid-state anaerobic digestion (SS-AD)[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023, 462: 142231.
28	SINGH Nisha, MATHUR Anshu S, TULI Deepak K, et al. Cellulosic ethanol production via consolidated bioprocessing by a novel thermophilic anaerobic bacterium isolated from a Himalayan hot spring[J]. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2017, 10: 73.
29	FROESE Alan G, SPARLING Richard. Cross-feeding and wheat straw extractives enhance growth of Clostridium thermocellum-containing co-cultures for consolidated bioprocessing[J]. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 2021, 44(4): 819-830.
30	TAHA Mohamed, SHAHSAVARI Esmaeil, Khalid AL-HOTHALY, et al. Enhanced biological straw saccharification through coculturing of lignocellulose-degrading microorganisms[J]. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2015, 175(8): 3709-3728.
31	ALTHURI Avanthi, VENKATA MOHAN S. Sequential and consolidated bioprocessing of biogenic municipal solid waste: A strategic pairing of thermophilic anaerobe and mesophilic microaerobe for ethanol production[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 308: 123260.
32	PATLE S, LAL B. Ethanol production from hydrolysed agricultural wastes using mixed culture of Zymomonas mobilis and Candida tropicalis [J]. Biotechnol Lett, 2007, 29(12): 1839-1843.
33	BRETHAUER Simone, STUDER Michael Hanspeter. Consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulose by a microbial consortium[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2014, 7(4): 1446-1453.
34	WEN Zhiqiang, WU Mianbin, LIN Yijun, et al. Artificial symbiosis for acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) fermentation from alkali extracted deshelled corn cobs by co-culture of Clostridium beijerinckii and Clostridium cellulovorans [J]. Microbial Cell Factories, 2014, 13(1): 92.
35	QIAN Xiujuan, CHEN Lin, SUI Yuan, et al. Biotechnological potential and applications of microbial consortia[J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2020, 40: 107500.
36	BAO Teng, JIANG Wenyan, AHMAD Qurat-ul-Ain, et al. Consolidated bioprocessing for ethanol and butanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: Recent advances in strain and process engineering[M]//A-Z of biorefinery. Elsevier, 2022: 473-506.
37	CUNHA J T, ROMANÍ A, COSTA C E, et al. Molecular and physiological basis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae tolerance to adverse lignocellulose-based process conditions[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2019, 103(1): 159-175.
38	KHRAMTSOV Nikolai, MCDADE Luise, AMERIK Alexander, et al. Industrial yeast strain engineered to ferment ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(17): 8310-8313.
39	ZHANG Guochang, KONG In Iok, WEI Na, et al. Optimization of an acetate reduction pathway for producing cellulosic ethanol by engineered yeast[J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2016, 113(12): 2587-2596.
40	CUNHA Joana T, COSTA Carlos E, FERRAZ Luís, et al. HAA1 and PRS3 overexpression boosts yeast tolerance towards acetic acid improving xylose or glucose consumption: Unravelling the underlying mechanisms[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2018, 102(10): 4589-4600.
41	Jianfa OU, XU Ningning, ERNST Patrick, et al. Process engineering of cellulosic n-butanol production from corn-based biomass using Clostridium cellulovorans [J]. Process Biochemistry, 2017, 62: 144-150.
42	SALEHI JOUZANI Gholamreza, TAHERZADEH Mohammad J. Advances in consolidated bioprocessing systems for bioethanol and butanol production from biomass: A comprehensive review[J]. Biofuel Research Journal, 2015: 152-195.
43	RYDZAK Thomas, LYND Lee R, GUSS Adam M. Elimination of formate production in Clostridium thermocellum [J]. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2015, 42(9): 1263-1272.
44	BISWAS Ranjita, ZHENG Tianyong, OLSON Daniel G, et al. Elimination of hydrogenase active site assembly blocks H₂ production and increases ethanol yield in Clostridium thermocellum [J]. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2015, 8: 20.
45	FROESE Alan Grant, NGUYEN Tran-Nguyen, AYELE Belay T, et al. Digestibility of wheat and cattail biomass using a co-culture of thermophilic anaerobes for consolidated bioprocessing[J]. BioEnergy Research, 2020, 13(1): 325-333.
46	BISWAS Ranjita, PRABHU Sandeep, LYND Lee R, et al. Increase in ethanol yield via elimination of lactate production in an ethanol-tolerant mutant of Clostridium thermocellum [J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(2): e86389.
47	RYDZAK Thomas, GARCIA David, STEVENSON David M, et al. Deletion of Type Ⅰ glutamine synthetase deregulates nitrogen metabolism and increases ethanol production in Clostridium thermocellum [J]. Metabolic Engineering, 2017, 41: 182-191.
48	TIAN Liang, PEROT Skyler J, Shuen HON, et al. Enhanced ethanol formation by Clostridium thermocellum via pyruvate decarboxylase[J]. Microbial Cell Factories, 2017, 16(1): 171.
49	Shuen HON, HOLWERDA Evert K, WORTHEN Robert S, et al. Expressing the Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum pforA in engineered Clostridium thermocellum improves ethanol production[J]. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2018, 11: 242.
50	CHENG Chi, LI Weiming, LIN Meng, et al. Metabolic engineering of Clostridium carboxidivorans for enhanced ethanol and butanol production from syngas and glucose[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 284: 415-423.
51	WEN Zhiqiang, MINTON Nigel P, ZHANG Ying, et al. Enhanced solvent production by metabolic engineering of a twin-clostridial consortium[J]. Metabolic Engineering, 2017, 39: 38-48.
52	MALEKI Fatemeh, CHANGIZIAN Mohammad, ZOLFAGHARI Narges, et al. Consolidated bioprocessing for bioethanol production by metabolically engineered Bacillus subtilis strains[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 13731.

单菌/菌群	底物及底物浓度	预处理	乙醇产量/g·L^-1	发酵时间/d	参考文献
Scheffersomyces shehatae JCM18690	100g/L淀粉	—	9.21	10	[9]
白腐菌Bm-2	13.4g/L生粉	—	13	12	[3]
白腐菌	20g/L稻草	球磨预处理	3.4	6	[10]
宛氏拟青霉ATHUM 8891	27g/L葡萄糖木糖混合物	—	10.5	15	[11]
Clostridium phytofermentans ATCC 700394	16.5g/L玉米芯	氨纤维爆破预处理	2.8	10	[12]
热纤梭菌ATCC 31924	8g/L微晶纤维素	—	2.45	5	[13]
HPP	7g/L α-纤维素	—	2.5	6	[2]
SV79	10g/L农业废弃物	—	2.63mmol/(L·g)	7	[19]
合成微生物群落	867g/kg麦秆总固形物	—	3.7	5	[21]

单菌/菌群	底物及底物浓度	预处理	乙醇产量/g·L^-1	发酵时间/d	参考文献
Scheffersomyces shehatae JCM18690	100g/L淀粉	—	9.21	10	[9]
白腐菌Bm-2	13.4g/L生粉	—	13	12	[3]
白腐菌	20g/L稻草	球磨预处理	3.4	6	[10]
宛氏拟青霉ATHUM 8891	27g/L葡萄糖木糖混合物	—	10.5	15	[11]
Clostridium phytofermentans ATCC 700394	16.5g/L玉米芯	氨纤维爆破预处理	2.8	10	[12]
热纤梭菌ATCC 31924	8g/L微晶纤维素	—	2.45	5	[13]
HPP	7g/L α-纤维素	—	2.5	6	[2]
SV79	10g/L农业废弃物	—	2.63mmol/(L·g)	7	[19]
合成微生物群落	867g/kg麦秆总固形物	—	3.7	5	[21]

组合微生物体系	底物及底物浓度	预处理方法	乙醇产量/g·L^-1	发酵时间/d	参考文献
梭菌属菌DBT-IOC-C19，梭菌属菌DBT-IOC-DC21，热厌氧菌DBT-IOC-X2	14.2g/L稻草	脱乙酰稀酸预处理	1.75	4	[28]
热纤梭菌DSM1237，C. stercorarium DSM8532，T. thermohydrosulfuricus WC₁	2g/L麦草	浸提	1.1	5	[29]
热纤梭菌X514，热厌氧杆菌39E	1%纤维素粉	—	2.76	4	[26]
热纤梭菌ATCG 27405和毕赤酵母NCIM-3498	10g/L木材废料	碱处理	36.9	5	[31]
C. phytofermentans和酿酒酵母cdt-1	100g/L α-纤维素	—	22	24	[23]
运动发酵单胞菌，热带假丝酵母	123g/L果菜渣中还原糖	酶水解	54	24h	[32]
里氏木霉，酿酒酵母和树干毕赤酵母	17.5g/L小麦秸秆	稀酸预处理	9.8	6	[33]
噬纤维梭菌743B，拜氏梭菌NCIMB 8052	68.6g/L玉米棒	碱处理	0.9	3	[34]

组合微生物体系	底物及底物浓度	预处理方法	乙醇产量/g·L^-1	发酵时间/d	参考文献
梭菌属菌DBT-IOC-C19，梭菌属菌DBT-IOC-DC21，热厌氧菌DBT-IOC-X2	14.2g/L稻草	脱乙酰稀酸预处理	1.75	4	[28]
热纤梭菌DSM1237，C. stercorarium DSM8532，T. thermohydrosulfuricus WC₁	2g/L麦草	浸提	1.1	5	[29]
热纤梭菌X514，热厌氧杆菌39E	1%纤维素粉	—	2.76	4	[26]
热纤梭菌ATCG 27405和毕赤酵母NCIM-3498	10g/L木材废料	碱处理	36.9	5	[31]
C. phytofermentans和酿酒酵母cdt-1	100g/L α-纤维素	—	22	24	[23]
运动发酵单胞菌，热带假丝酵母	123g/L果菜渣中还原糖	酶水解	54	24h	[32]
里氏木霉，酿酒酵母和树干毕赤酵母	17.5g/L小麦秸秆	稀酸预处理	9.8	6	[33]
噬纤维梭菌743B，拜氏梭菌NCIMB 8052	68.6g/L玉米棒	碱处理	0.9	3	[34]

菌株	底物	代谢工程改造方法	研究结果	参考文献
酿酒酵母K1-V116	Whatman滤纸和玉米秸秆	整合编码纤维素酶的基因到葡萄酒酵母菌株的染色体rDNA和Delta区中	重组菌株在96h内发酵了63%的纤维素，乙醇产率（体积比）达到2.6%	[38]
酿酒酵母SR8A6S3	芒草	表达乙酰化乙醛脱氢酶（AADH）、乙酰辅酶A合成酶（ACS）和磷酸戊糖途径基因（Xyl1、Xyl2）	乙酸解毒并增加NAD⁺消耗木糖，生产18.4%以上的乙醇	[39]
酿酒酵母PE-2	未解毒硬木	过表达由基因HAA1编码的弱酸胁迫转录激活因子和由PRS3编码的磷酸核糖焦磷酸合成酶	HAA1或PRS3过表达促进酵母生长和糖消耗，提高对乙酸的耐受性	[40]
热纤梭菌DSM 1313	纤维二糖	删除Ⅰ型谷氨酰胺合成酶（glnA）减少氨同化	缬氨酸和总氨基酸水平分别降低53%和44%，乙醇产量增加53%	[47]
热纤梭菌	纤维二糖	过表达A. pasteurianus的PDC基因和T. saccharolyticum的adhA基因	用60g/L纤维素生产21.3g/L乙醇	[48]
热纤梭菌	微晶纤维素	引入T. saccharolyticum的pforA基因和铁氧还蛋白	从100g/L微晶纤维素中产25g/L乙醇	[49]
C.carboxidivorans P7	葡萄糖	过表达aor、adhE2、fnr和adhE2或aor基因	工程菌株比野生型菌株表现出更高乙醇产量	[50]
噬纤维梭菌743B，拜氏梭菌NCIMB 8052	玉米棒	使用CRISPR干扰技术下调氢化酶基因，过表达有机酸同化基因（xylR）和戊糖利用基因（xylR）	工程化的梭状芽孢杆菌可产生6.37g/L的乙醇	[51]

一体化生物加工CBP产纤维乙醇研究进展

Research progress in the production of cellulosic ethanol via consolidated bioprocessing

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 52

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李新月, 李振京, 韩沂杭, 郭永强, 闫瑜, 哈力米热·卡热木拉提, 赵会吉, 柴永明, 刘东, 殷长龙. 油脂加氢脱氧生产绿色柴油催化剂的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(S1): 351-364.
[2]	何世坤, 张荣花, 李昊阳, 潘晖, 冯君锋. 脱铝分子筛固体酸催化葡萄糖制备5-羟甲基糠醛[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(S1): 374-381.
[3]	刘振涛, 梅金林, 王春雅, 段爱军, 巩雁军, 徐春明, 王喜龙. 一步法加氢制生物航煤催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(9): 4909-4924.
[4]	石佳博, 张宇轩, 陈雪峰, 谭蕉君. 单宁酸-纳米协同改性胶原纤维多孔材料的制备及其油水分离性能[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(8): 4624-4629.
[5]	胡婷霞, 赵立欣, 姚宗路, 霍丽丽, 贾吉秀, 谢腾. 双金属催化剂在生物质焦油催化蒸汽重整领域的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(8): 4354-4365.
[6]	赵伟刚, 张倩倩, 蓝钰玲, 闫雯, 周晓剑, 范毜仔, 杜官本. 真空绝热板芯材的研究进展与展望[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(7): 3910-3922.
[7]	江慧珍, 罗凯, 王艳, 费华, 吴登科, 叶卓铖, 曹雄金. 废弃生物质复合相变材料的构建与应用[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(7): 3934-3945.
[8]	张子杭, 王树荣. 生物质热解转化与产物低碳利用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(7): 3692-3708.
[9]	王颖杰, 祝新利. 溶胶-凝胶法制备高分散Ni-Cu/SiO₂ 促进间甲酚直接脱氧制甲苯[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(7): 3824-3833.
[10]	龚雪梅, 蒋军, 王超, 梅长彤. 纳米纤维素疏水改性及其功能化应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(6): 3187-3198.
[11]	闫哲, 刘畅, 王丰旭, 周宏旺, 刘樨, 赵雪冰. 耦合生物质氧化转化的CO₂电化学还原[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(6): 3310-3321.
[12]	谢国平, 谭雪松, 刘鹏, 苗长林, 许光文, 庄新姝. 基于生物基衍生有机溶剂的木质纤维素预处理研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(6): 3347-3358.
[13]	蓝瑞嵩, 刘丽华, 张倩, 陈博彦, 洪俊明. 硫掺杂石墨烯作为MFC阴极性能和生物毒性检测[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(6): 3430-3439.
[14]	何世坤, 张文豪, 冯君锋, 潘晖. 负载金属型固体酸催化木质纤维生物质定向转化为乙酰丙酸甲酯[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(6): 3042-3050.
[15]	韩伟, 韩恒文, 程薇, 汤玮健. 碳中和目标驱动下生物质燃料技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(5): 2463-2474.