质子交换膜燃料电池研究进展

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-2003

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

质子交换膜燃料电池（proton exchange membrane fuel cell, PEMFC）因具有效率高、功率密度大、排放产物仅为水、低温启动性好等多方面优点，被公认为下一代车用动力的发展方向之一。然而，目前PEMFC在耐久性和成本方面距离商业化的要求还存在一定差距。为攻克上述两大难题，需要燃料电池全产业链的共同努力和进步。本文回顾了近年来质子交换膜燃料电池从催化剂、膜电极组件、电堆到燃料电池发动机全产业链的研究进展和成果，梳理出单原子催化剂、非贵金属催化剂、特殊形貌催化剂、有序化催化层、高温质子交换膜、膜电极层间界面优化、一体化双极板-扩散层、氢气系统循环等研究热点。文章指出，催化层低铂/非铂化、质子交换膜超薄化、膜电极组件梯度化/有序化、燃料电池运行高温化、自增湿化是未来的发展趋势，迫切需要进一步的创新与突破。

关键词: 燃料电池, 催化剂, 膜, 膜电极组件, 燃料电池堆, 燃料电池发动机

Abstract:

Proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) has been considered as one of the most promising next-generation power sources for clean automobiles because of their advantages in efficiency, power density, environmental friendliness, low temperature start ability, etc.. However, the gap between the durability and cost of PEMFC and those of commercialization requirements is still large. To overcome the above-mentioned two major problems, joint efforts and progress of the entire fuel cell process chain are required. In this paper, the recent research progress of the entire PEMFC process chain, from catalysts, membrane electrode assemblies (MEA), fuel cell stacks to fuel cell engines, are analyzed and classified reviewed, and research hotspots such as single-atom catalysts, non-noble metal catalysts, special morphology catalysts, ordered catalyst layers, high-temperature proton exchange membranes, MEA interlayer interface optimization, integrated porous bipolar plates, hydrogen circulation, are introduced. This paper points out that low/non-platinum catalyst layers, ultra-thin proton exchange membranes, gradient/ordered MEA, high-temperature operation and self-humidification of fuel cells are the future development trends, of which further innovation and breakthrough are urgently needed.

Key words: fuel cells, catalyst, membranes, membrane electrode assemblies, fuel cell stack, fuel cell engine

中图分类号:

TK91

高帷韬, 雷一杰, 张勋, 胡晓波, 宋平平, 赵卿, 王诚, 毛宗强. 质子交换膜燃料电池研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(3): 1539-1555.

GAO Weitao, LEI Yijie, ZHANG Xun, HU Xiaobo, SONG Pingping, ZHAO Qing, WANG Cheng, MAO Zongqiang. An overview of proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(3): 1539-1555.

图/表 1

参考文献 106

1	王墨林, 王贺武, 欧阳明高, 等. 燃料电池汽车及氢能基础设施在美国的最新进展[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2013, 4(2): 178-184.
	WANG Molin, WANG Hewu, OUYANG Minggao, et al. Latest developments of fuel cell vehicles and hydrogen supply infrastructures in American[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2013, 4(2): 178-184.
2	XU L F, MUELLER C D, LI J Q, et al. Multi-objective component sizing based on optimal energy management strategy of fuel cell electric vehicles[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 157: 664-674.
3	王诚, 王树博, 张剑波, 等. 车用质子交换膜燃料电池材料部件[J]. 化学进展, 2015, 27(Z1): 310-320.
	WANG Cheng, WANG Shubo, ZHANG Jianbo, et al. The key materials and components for proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2015, 27(Z1): 310-320.
4	CHEN H C, PEI P C, SONG M C. Lifetime prediction and the economic lifetime of proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 142: 154-163.
5	刘锋, 王诚, 张剑波, 等. 质子交换膜燃料电池有序化膜电极[J]. 化学进展, 2014, 26(11): 1763-1771.
	LIU Feng, WANG Cheng, ZHANG Jianbo, et al. Ordered membrane electrode assembly of proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2014, 26(11): 1763-1771.
6	王诚, 王树博, 张剑波, 等. 车用燃料电池耐久性研究[J]. 化学进展, 2015, 27(4): 424-435.
	WANG Cheng, WANG Shubo, ZHANG Jianbo, et al. The durability research on the proton exchange membrane fuel cell for automobile application[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2015, 27(4): 424-435.
7	BENJAMIN T, BORUP R, GARLAND N,et al. Fuel cell technical team roadmap[R]. US Department of Energy, Fuel Cell Technologies Office, 2017.
8	YOSHIDA T, KOJIMA K. Toyota MIRAI fuel cell vehicle and progress toward a future hydrogen society[J]. Interface Magazine, 2015, 24(2): 45-49.
9	蒋尚峰, 衣宝廉. 有序化膜电极研究进展[J]. 电化学, 2016, 22(3): 213-218.
	JIANG Shangfeng, YI Baolian. Progress of order-structured membrane electrode assembly[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry, 2016, 22(3): 213-218.
10	SUN Y Y, CUI L R, GONG J, et al. Design of a catalytic layer with hierarchical proton transport structure: the role of nafion nanofiber[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 2955-2963.
11	HU Z Y, LI J Q, XU L F, et al. Multi-objective energy management optimization and parameter sizing for proton exchange membrane hybrid fuel cell vehicles[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 129: 108-121.
12	宋显珠, 郑明月, 肖劲松, 等. 氢燃料电池关键材料发展现状及研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(S2): 1001-1005, 1016.
	SONG Xianzhu, ZHENG Mingyue, XIAO Jinsong, et al. Research progress on development status and trend of key materials of hydrogen fuel cells[J]. Materials Reports, 2020, 34(S2): 1001-1005, 1016.
13	IOROI T, SIROMA Z, YAMAZAKI S I, et al. Electrocatalysts for PEM fuel cells[J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2019, 9(23): 1801284.
14	LIN R, CAI X, ZENG H, et al. Stability of high-performance Pt-based catalysts for oxygen reduction reactions[J]. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(17): 1705332.
15	STACY J, REGMI Y N, LEONARD B, et al. The recent progress and future of oxygen reduction reaction catalysis: a review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 69: 401-414.
16	WANG X X, SWIHART M T, WU G. Achievements, challenges and perspectives on cathode catalysts in proton exchange membrane fuel cells for transportation[J]. Nature Catalysis, 2019, 2(7): 578-589.
17	ZHANG B W, YANG H L, WANG Y X, et al. A comprehensive review on controlling surface composition of Pt-based bimetallic electrocatalysts[J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2018, 8(20): 1703597.
18	LIU M L, ZHAO Z P, DUAN X F, et al. Nanoscale structure design for high-performance Pt-based ORR catalysts[J]. Advanced Materials, 2019, 31(6): 1802234.
19	KONGKANAND A, MATHIAS M F. The priority and challenge of high-power performance of low-platinum proton-exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2016, 7(7): 1127-1137.
20	ZHAO Z P, HOSSAIN M D, XU C C, et al. Tailoring a three-phase microenvironment for high-performance oxygen reduction reaction in proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Matter, 2020, 3(5): 1774-1790.
21	MA R G, LIN G X, ZHOU Y, et al. A review of oxygen reduction mechanisms for metal-free carbon-based electrocatalysts[J]. NPJ Computational Materials, 2019, 5: 78.
22	WANG Y M, ZOU L L, HUANG Q H, et al. 3D carbon aerogel-supported PtNi intermetallic nanoparticles with high metal loading as a durable oxygen reduction electrocatalyst[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(43): 26695-26703.
23	KIM Y, LEE D, KWON Y, et al. Enhanced electrochemical oxygen reduction reaction performance with Pt nanocluster catalysts supported on microporous graphene-like 3D carbon[J]. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2019, 838: 89-93.
24	BARIM S B, BOZBAG S E, YU H B, et al. Mesoporous carbon aerogel supported PtCu bimetallic nanoparticles via supercritical deposition and their dealloying and electrocatalytic behaviour[J]. Catalysis Today, 2018, 310: 166-175.
25	ROSADO G, VERDE Y, VALENZUELA-MUÑIZ A M, et al. Catalytic activity of Pt-Ni nanoparticles supported on multi-walled carbon nanotubes for the oxygen reduction reaction[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(48): 23260-23271.
26	WU D Z, SHEN X C, ZHOU L Q, et al. A vacuum impregnation method for synthesizing octahedral Pt₂CuNi nanoparticles on mesoporous carbon support and the oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalytic properties[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2020, 564: 245-253.
27	ZHAO Y G, LIU J J, WU Y J, et al. Proton conductive Pt-Co nanoparticles anchoring on citric acid functionalized graphene for efficient oxygen reduction reaction[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2017, 360: 528-537.
28	WU Z X, SONG M, WANG J, et al. Recent progress in nitrogen-doped metal-free electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction[J]. Catalysts, 2018, 8(5): 196.
29	LI J C, HOU P X, LIU C. Heteroatom-doped carbon nanotube and graphene-based electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction[J]. Small, 2017, 13(45): 1702002.
30	ZHANG H J, YAO S, GENG J, et al. Oxygen reduction reaction with efficient, metal-free nitrogen, fluoride-codoped carbon electrocatalysts derived from melamine hydrogen fluoride salt[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2019, 535: 436-443.
31	LYU Q, SI W Y, HE J J, et al. Selectively nitrogen-doped carbon materials as superior metal-free catalysts for oxygen reduction[J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9: 3376.
32	CAZETTA A L, SPESSATO L, BEDIN K C, et al. Metal-free ovalbumin-derived N-S-co-doped nanoporous carbon materials as efficient electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2019, 467/468: 75-83.
33	竹涛，韩一伟，刘帅，等．单原子位点催化剂及其电催化应用研究进展[J].‍‍化工进展， 2022,41（2）:666-618.
	ZHU Tao, HAN Yiwei, LIU Shuai, et al. Progress in electrocatalysis by single-atom site catalysts[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41（2）: 666-618.
34	LIN Y C, LIU P Y, VELASCO E, et al. Fabricating single-atom catalysts from chelating metal in open frameworks[J]. Advanced Materials, 2019, 31(18): 1808193.
35	JIAO K, XUAN J, DU Q, et al. Designing the next generation of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Nature, 2021, 595(7867): 361-369.
36	文颖. 非铂氧还原催化剂的制备及其性能研究[D]. 南宁：广西大学, 2020.
	WEN Ying. Preparation and performance of low-/non-platinum catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2020.
37	ZHANG Y P, HU Y Y, LI S Z, et al. Manganese dioxide-coated carbon nanotubes as an improved cathodic catalyst for oxygen reduction in a microbial fuel cell[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 196(22): 9284-9289.
38	WANG H L, LIANG Y Y, LI Y G, et al. Co_1- _x S-graphene hybrid: a high-performance metal chalcogenide electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2011, 50(46): 10969-10972.
39	FENG Y J, HE T, ALONSO-VANTE N. In situ free-surfactant synthesis and ORR-electrochemistry of carbon-supported Co₃S₄ and CoSe₂ nanoparticles[J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2008, 20(1): 26-28.
40	LIU J, SUN X J, SONG P, et al. High-performance oxygen reduction electrocatalysts based on cheap carbon black, nitrogen, and trace iron[J]. Advanced Materials, 2013, 25(47): 6879-6883.
41	CHONG L, WEN J, KUBAL J, et al. Ultralow-loading platinum-cobalt fuel cell catalysts derived from imidazolate frameworks[J]. Science, 2018, 362(6420): 1276-1281.
42	魏子栋. 质子交换膜燃料电池催化剂性能增强方法研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(9): 2629-2639.
	WEI Zidong. Advances of the catalytic performance enhancement for proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2016, 35(9): 2629-2639.
43	TAO L, HUANG B L, JIN F D, et al. Atomic PdAu interlayer sandwiched into Pd/Pt core/shell nanowires achieves superstable oxygen reduction catalysis[J]. ACS Nano, 2020, 14(9): 11570-11578.
44	LUO M C, SUN Y J, ZHANG X, et al. Stable high-index faceted Pt skin on zigzag-like PtFe nanowires enhances oxygen reduction catalysis[J]. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(10): 1705515.
45	QIN Y C, ZHANG W L, GUO K, et al. Fine-tuning intrinsic strain in penta-twinned Pt-Cu-Mn nanoframes boosts oxygen reduction catalysis[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2020, 30(11): 1910107.
46	KONG F, REN Z, NOROUZI BANIS M, et al. Active and stable Pt-Ni alloy octahedra catalyst for oxygen reduction via near-surface atomical engineering[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2020, 10(7): 4205-4214.
47	TAO L, YU D, ZHOU J S, et al. Ultrathin wall (1nm) and superlong Pt nanotubes with enhanced oxygen reduction reaction performance[J]. Small, 2018, 14(22): 1704503.
48	BU L Z, GUO S J, ZHANG X, et al. Surface engineering of hierarchical platinum-cobalt nanowires for efficient electrocatalysis[J]. Nature Communications, 2016, 7: 11850.
49	CHEN S, NIU Z, XIE C, et al. Effects of catalyst processing on the activity and stability of Pt-Ni nanoframe electrocatalysts[J]. ACS Nano, 2018, 12(8): 8697-8705.
50	TIAN X, ZHAO X, SU Y Q, et al. Engineering bunched Pt-Ni alloy nanocages for efficient oxygen reduction in practical fuel cells[J]. Science, 2019, 366(6467): 850-856.
51	ESCORIHUELA J, NARDUCCI R, COMPAÑ V, et al. Proton conductivity of composite polyelectrolyte membranes with metal-organic frameworks for fuel cell applications[J]. Advanced Materials Interfaces, 2019, 6(2): 1801146.
52	BLIZNAKOV S T, VUKMIROVIC M B, YANG L, et al. Pt monolayer on electrodeposited Pd nanostructures: advanced cathode catalysts for PEM fuel cells[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2012, 159(9): F501-F506.
53	CHEN C, KANG Y, HUO Z, et al. Highly crystalline multimetallic nanoframes with three-dimensional electrocatalytic surfaces[J]. Science, 2014, 343(6177): 1339-1343.
54	CHEN M, ZHAO C, SUN F M, et al. Research progress of catalyst layer and interlayer interface structures in membrane electrode assembly (MEA) for proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) system[J]. eTransportation, 2020, 5: 100075.
55	ABDEL-BASET T, BENJAMIN T, BORUP R,et al. Fuel cell technical team roadmap[R]. US Department of Energy, Fuel Cell Technologies Office, 2013.
56	LEE M, UCHIDA M, YANO H, et al. New evaluation method for the effectiveness of platinum/carbon electrocatalysts under operating conditions[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2010, 55(28): 8504-8512.
57	CHEN G Y, WANG C, LEI Y J, et al. Gradient design of Pt/C ratio and Nafion content in cathode catalyst layer of PEMFCs[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(50): 29960-29965.
58	QIU Y L, ZHANG H M, ZHONG H X, et al. A novel cathode structure with double catalyst layers and low Pt loading for proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(14): 5836-5844.
59	TIAN Z Q, LIM S H, POH C K, et al. A highly order-structured membrane electrode assembly with vertically aligned carbon nanotubes for ultra-low Pt loading PEM fuel cells[J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2011, 1(6): 1205-1214.
60	ZHANG C K, YU H M, LI Y K, et al. Highly stable ternary tin-palladium-platinum catalysts supported on hydrogenated TiO₂ nanotube arrays for fuel cells[J]. Nanoscale, 2013, 5(15): 6834.
61	XIA Z X, WANG S L, JIANG L H, et al. Bio-inspired construction of advanced fuel cell cathode with Pt anchored in ordered hybrid polymer matrix[J]. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5: 16100.
62	PAN C F, WU H, WANG C, et al. Nanowire-based high-performance “micro fuel cells”: one nanowire, one fuel cell[J]. Advanced Materials, 2008, 20(9): 1644-1648.
63	ZENG Y C, SHAO Z G, ZHANG H J, et al. Nanostructured ultrathin catalyst layer based on open-walled PtCo bimetallic nanotube arrays for proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Nano Energy, 2017, 34: 344-355.
64	KRAYTSBERG A, EIN-ELI Y. Review of advanced materials for proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2014, 28(12): 7303-7330.
65	DURANTE V A, DELANEY W E. Highly stable fuel cell membranes and methods of making them: US20090155662[P]. 2009-06-18.
66	YOON K R, LEE K A, JO S, et al. Mussel-inspired polydopamine-treated reinforced composite membranes with self-supported CeO _x radical scavengers for highly stable PEM fuel cells[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2019, 29(3): 1806929.
67	翟云峰, 张华民, 叶威, 等. 磷酸流失对H₃PO₄/PBI高温PEMFC性能的影响[J]. 电池, 2008, 38(1): 3-7.
	ZHAI Yunfeng, ZHANG Huamin, YE Wei, et al. Influences of H₃PO₄ leaching on the performance of H₃PO₄/PBI high temperature PEMFC[J]. Battery Bimonthly, 2008, 38(1): 3-7.
68	李金晟, 葛君杰, 刘长鹏, 等. 燃料电池高温质子交换膜研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(9): 4894-4903.
	LI Jinsheng, GE Junjie, LIU Changpeng, et al. Review on high temperature proton exchange membranes for fuel cell[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(9): 4894-4903.
69	吴魁, 解东来. 高温质子交换膜研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2012, 31(10): 2202-2206, 2220.
	WU Kui, XIE Donglai. Research progress in high temperature proton exchange membranes[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2012, 31(10): 2202-2206, 2220.
70	PARK C H, LEE S Y, HWANG D S, et al. Nanocrack-regulated self-humidifying membranes[J]. Nature, 2016, 532(7600): 480-483.
71	OZDEN A, SHAHGALDI S, LI X G, et al. A review of gas diffusion layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells—With a focus on characteristics, characterization techniques, materials and designs[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2019, 74: 50-102.
72	JIAO K, LI X G. Water transport in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2011, 37(3): 221-291.
73	YUN W. Porous-media flow fields for polymer electrolyte fuel cells[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2009, 156(10): B1134.
74	TANAKA S, BRADFIELD W W, LEGRAND C, et al. Numerical and experimental study of the effects of the electrical resistance and diffusivity under clamping pressure on the performance of a metallic gas-diffusion layer in polymer electrolyte fuel cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2016, 330: 273-284.
75	LEE J, HINEBAUGH J, BAZYLAK A. Synchrotron X-ray radiographic investigations of liquid water transport behavior in a PEMFC with MPL-coated GDLs[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2013, 227: 123-130.
76	AMAMIYA I, TANAKA S. Current topics proposed by PEFC manufacturers, etc. -current status and topics of fuel cells for FCV[EB/OL]. .
77	SUN R L, XIA Z X, YANG C R, et al. Experimental measurement of proton conductivity and electronic conductivity of membrane electrode assembly for proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International, 2020, 30(6): 912-917.
78	BREITWIESER M, KLINGELE M, VIERRATH S, et al. Tailoring the membrane-electrode interface in PEM fuel cells: a review and perspective on novel engineering approaches[J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2018, 8(4): 1701257.
79	KOH J K, JEON Y, CHO Y I, et al. A facile preparation method of surface patterned polymer electrolyte membranes for fuel cell applications[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2014, 2(23): 8652-8659.
80	KLINGELE M, BREITWIESER M, ZENGERLE R, et al. Direct deposition of proton exchange membranes enabling high performance hydrogen fuel cells[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015, 3(21): 11239-11245.
81	KONGKANAND A, SUBRAMANIAN N P, YU Y C, et al. Achieving high-power PEM fuel cell performance with an ultralow-Pt-content core-shell catalyst[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2016, 6(3): 1578-1583.
82	JAMES B. Cost projections of PEM fuel cell systems for automobiles and medium-duty vehicles[C]//Fuel Cell Technologies Office Webinar, 2018.
83	ZHAO J, LI X G. A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell durability for vehicular applications: degradation modes and experimental techniques[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 199: 112022.
84	LI Y B, ZHOU Z F, LIU X L, et al. Modeling of PEM fuel cell with thin MEA under low humidity operating condition[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 242: 1513-1527.
85	HANIF S, SHI X, IQBAL N, et al. ZIF derived PtNiCo/NC cathode catalyst for proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2019, 258: 117947.
86	BORUP R, WEBER A. FC-PAD: fuel cell performance and durability consortium[R]. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), 2018.
87	BARZEGARI M M, GHADIMI M, MOMENIFAR M. Investigation of contact pressure distribution on gas diffusion layer of fuel cell with pneumatic endplate[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 263: 114663.
88	SONG Y X, ZHANG C Z, LING C Y, et al. Review on current research of materials, fabrication and application for bipolar plate in proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(54): 29832-29847.
89	ZHANG X, YANG X L, GAO W T, et al. An experimental research on the net output power and current density distribution of PEM fuel cells with trapezoid baffled flow fields[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2021, 45(15): 21464-21475.
90	MOJICA F, RAHMAN M A, MORA J M, et al. Experimental study of three channel designs with model comparison in a PEM fuel cell[J]. Fuel Cells, 2020, 20(5): 547-557.
91	ZHANG H T, LI X G, LIU X Z, et al. Enhancing fuel cell durability for fuel cell plug-in hybrid electric vehicles through strategic power management[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 241: 483-490.
92	CHEN R X, QIN Y Z, DU Q, et al. Effects of clamping force on the operating behavior of PEM fuel cell[C]//SAE Technical Paper Series. 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA, United States: SAE International, 2018.
93	ZHOU Z H, QIU D K, ZHAI S, et al. Investigation of the assembly for high-power proton exchange membrane fuel cell stacks through an efficient equivalent model[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 277: 115532.
94	ZHANG G B, XIE B, BAO Z M, et al. Multi-phase simulation of proton exchange membrane fuel cell with 3D fine mesh flow field[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2018, 42(15): 4697-4709.
95	李建秋, 方川, 徐梁飞. 燃料电池汽车研究现状及发展[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2014, 5(1): 17-29.
	LI Jianqiu, FANG Chuan, XU Liangfei. Current status and trends of the research and development for fuel cell vehicles[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2014, 5(1): 17-29.
96	GAO W T, HU Z Y, HUANG H Y, et al. All-condition economy evaluation method for fuel cell systems: system efficiency contour map[J]. eTransportation, 2021, 9: 100127.
97	HASEGAWA T, IMANISHI H, NADA M, et al. Development of the fuel cell system in the mirai FCV[C]//SAE Technical Paper Series. 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA, United States: SAE International, 2016.
98	TERANISHI K, KAWATA K, TSUSHIMA S, et al. Degradation mechanism of PEMFC under open circuit operation[J]. Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 2006, 9(10): A475.
99	INABA M, KINUMOTO T, KIRIAKE M, et al. Gas crossover and membrane degradation in polymer electrolyte fuel cells[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2006, 51(26): 5746-5753.
100	CURTIN D E, LOUSENBERG R D, HENRY T J, et al. Advanced materials for improved PEMFC performance and life[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2004, 131(1/2): 41-48.
101	YU W, XU S C, NI H S. Air compressors for fuel cell vehicles: an systematic review[J]. SAE International Journal of Alternative Powertrains, 2015, 4(1): 115-122.
102	LLAMAS X, ERIKSSON L. Control-oriented compressor model with adiabatic efficiency extrapolation[J]. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2017, 10(4): 1903-1916.
103	张奥, 杨军, 吴桐, 等. 燃料电池车载氢气供给系统概述[J]. 船电技术, 2019, 39(9): 53-56.
	ZHANG Ao, YANG Jun, WU Tong, et al. Application of hydrogen supply system for fuel cell vehicles[J]. Marine Electric & Electronic Engineering, 2019, 39(9): 53-56.
104	CHEN J X, SIEGEL J B, STEFANOPOULOU A G, et al. Optimization of purge cycle for dead-ended anode fuel cell operation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(12): 5092-5105.
105	马秋玉, 王宇鹏, 都京, 等. 燃料电池发动机氢气循环设计方案综述[J]. 汽车文摘, 2019(4): 11-14.
	MA Qiuyu, WANG Yupeng, DU Jing, et al. Research on the hydrogen circulation system of fuel cell[J]. Automotive Digest, 2019(4): 11-14.
106	邵志刚, 衣宝廉. 氢能与燃料电池发展现状及展望[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2019, 34(4): 469-477.
	SHAO Zhigang, YI Baolian. Developing trend and present status of hydrogen energy and fuel cell development[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2019, 34(4): 469-477.

[1]	张明焱, 刘燕, 张雪婷, 刘亚科, 李从举, 张秀玲. 非贵金属双功能催化剂在锌空气电池研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 276-286.
[2]	时永兴, 林刚, 孙晓航, 蒋韦庚, 乔大伟, 颜彬航. 二氧化碳加氢制甲醇过程中铜基催化剂活性位点研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 287-298.
[3]	谢璐垚, 陈崧哲, 王来军, 张平. 用于SO₂去极化电解制氢的铂基催化剂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 299-309.
[4]	杨霞珍, 彭伊凡, 刘化章, 霍超. 熔铁催化剂活性相的调控及其费托反应性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 310-318.
[5]	张祚群, 高扬, 白超杰, 薛立新. 二次界面聚合同步反扩散原位生长ZIF-8纳米粒子制备聚酰胺混合基质反渗透（RO）膜[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 364-373.
[6]	许家珩, 李永胜, 罗春欢, 苏庆泉. 甲醇水蒸气重整工艺的优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 41-46.
[7]	王乐乐, 杨万荣, 姚燕, 刘涛, 何川, 刘逍, 苏胜, 孔凡海, 朱仓海, 向军. SCR脱硝催化剂掺废特性及性能影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 489-497.
[8]	邓丽萍, 时好雨, 刘霄龙, 陈瑶姬, 严晶颖. 非贵金属改性钒钛基催化剂NH₃-SCR脱硝协同控制VOCs[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 542-548.
[9]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[10]	程涛, 崔瑞利, 宋俊男, 张天琪, 张耘赫, 梁世杰, 朴实. 渣油加氢装置杂质沉积规律与压降升高机理分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4616-4627.
[11]	王鹏, 史会兵, 赵德明, 冯保林, 陈倩, 杨妲. 过渡金属催化氯代物的羰基化反应研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4649-4666.
[12]	张启, 赵红, 荣峻峰. 质子交换膜燃料电池中氧还原反应抗毒性电催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4677-4691.
[13]	王伟涛, 鲍婷玉, 姜旭禄, 何珍红, 王宽, 杨阳, 刘昭铁. 醛酮树脂基非金属催化剂催化氧气氧化苯制备苯酚[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4706-4715.
[14]	葛亚粉, 孙宇, 肖鹏, 刘琦, 刘波, 孙成蓥, 巩雁军. 分子筛去除VOCs的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4716-4730.
[15]	潘宜昌, 周荣飞, 邢卫红. 高效分离同碳数烃的先进微孔膜：现状与挑战[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3926-3942.