鼓泡床中电石渣加速碳酸化分析与响应面优化

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-1712

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

搭建了鼓泡床碳酸化反应器，研究常温常压下电石渣直接液相碳酸化矿化封存CO₂的能力，揭示了重要操作参数表观气速、液固比和CO₂浓度对电石渣矿化封存CO₂能力和碳酸化效率的影响规律。同时构建响应面模型，分析各参数对电石渣碳酸化效率的影响强度，优化获得最大碳酸化效率及相应操作工况。结果表明，增加气速有利于钙离子溶解和CO₂吸收，但反应器中过高气速易导致气相通道效应，不利于气液充分接触。当液固比降低，溶液中钙离子浓度提高，更有利于碳酸化反应，但液固比过低会影响固液间传质。适当增加CO₂浓度有利于提高碳酸化效率，但CO₂浓度增至到一定值后，对碳酸化效率影响降低。响应面建模分析发现，各因素对碳酸化效率影响顺序为：液固比>CO₂浓度>表观气速。优化结果发现碳酸化效率最高为93.58%，工况为表观气速0.07m/s，液固比为8.26mL/g和CO₂体积分数为20.91%。研究可知，鼓泡床中常温常压下电石渣直接液相加速碳酸化反应，具有较大的CO₂固定量和高的碳酸化效率，实验结果为电石渣加速矿化封存CO₂技术的发展提供了基础数据。

关键词: 鼓泡反应器, 温室气体, 二氧化碳捕集, 多相反应器, 加速碳酸化, 响应面模型, 电石渣

Abstract:

A bubble column carbonation reactor was set up. The CO₂ mineralization capacity through the direct aqueous carbonation of carbide slag under ambient temperature and atmospheric pressure was evaluated. The effects of the important operating parameters, including the superficial gas velocity, liquid to solid ratio and CO₂ concentration, on the capacity of CO₂ mineral carbonation and carbonation efficiency of carbide slag were revealed. The response surface model was built to analyze the effects of the operating parameters and to obtain the maximum of the carbonation efficiency. The results indicated that the increase in the gas velocity was beneficial to the calcium ion dissolution and CO₂ absorption, but it will have the gas channeling effect in the reactor when the gas velocity was high, which has an effect on the solid-liquid mass transfer and reduces the carbonation efficiency. When the liquid to solid ratio reduced, the concentration of calcium ions rose, which was good for the carbonation reactions. However, when the liquid to solid ratio was very small, it was disadvantageous for the solid-liquid mass transfer. Proper increase in the CO₂ concentration was beneficial to enhance the carbonation efficiency. When the CO₂ concentration increased to a certain level, it had a rare effect on the carbonation efficiency. According to the response surface modeling, the impact degree on the carbonation efficiency ranged as liquid-solid ratio > CO₂ concentration > superficial gas velocity. The optimization carbonation efficiency was 93.58% found by the response surface optimization, and the corresponding superficial gas velocity was 0.07m/s, the liquid-solid ratio 8.26mL/g and the CO₂ concentration was 20.91%. Therefore, the results showed that it had a good CO₂ mineralization capacity and a high carbonation efficiency for the direct aqueous carbonation of carbide slag under ambient temperature and pressure in a bubble column. This study provides the theoretical data for CO₂ capture by aqueous mineral carbonation of carbide slag. Accelerated carbonation of carbide slag in the bubble column is a promising process for CO₂ capture due to its higher carbonation conversion of carbide slag within a shorter reaction time.

Key words: bubble column reactor, greenhouse gas, CO₂ capture, multiphase reactor, accelerated carbonation, response surface model, carbide slag

中图分类号:

TK09

郑鹏, 李蔚玲, 郭亚飞, 孙健, 王瑞林, 赵传文. 鼓泡床中电石渣加速碳酸化分析与响应面优化[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(3): 1528-1538.

ZHENG Peng, LI Weiling, GUO Yafei, SUN Jian, WANG Ruilin, ZHAO Chuanwen. Analysis of carbide slag accelerated carbonation in bubble column and response surface optimization[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(3): 1528-1538.

图/表 16

参考文献 43

1	PAN Shuyuan, CHIANG A, CHANG E E, et al. An innovative approach to integrated carbon mineralization and waste utilization: a review[J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2015, 15(3): 1072-1091.
2	孙健. 高钙废弃物衍生吸收剂脱碳性能及其成型改性机制的研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2017.
	SUN Jian. Investigation on CO₂ capture properties and pelletization modification mechanism of CaO-based sorbent derived from calcium-rich wastes[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2017.
3	BOOT-HANDFORD M E, ABANADES J C, ANTHONY E J, et al. Carbon capture and storage update[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2014, 7(1): 130-189.
4	CORTÉS C G, TZIMAS E, PETEVES S. Technologies for coal based hydrogen and electricity co-production power plants with CO₂ capture[R]. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, EUR, 2009: 23661.
5	HO H J, IIZUKA A, SHIBATA E. Carbon capture and utilization technology without carbon dioxide purification and pressurization: a review on its necessity and available technologies[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(21): 8941-8954.
6	王中辉, 苏胜, 尹子骏, 等. CO₂矿化及吸收-矿化一体化(IAM)方法研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(4): 2318-2327.
	WANG Zhonghui, SU Sheng, YIN Zijun, et al. Research progress of CO₂ mineralization and integrated absorption-mineralization (IAM) method[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(4): 2318-2327.
7	SEIFRITZ W. CO₂ disposal by means of silicates[J]. Nature, 1990, 345(6275): 486.
8	王超, 杨保俊, 周金刚, 等. 由电石渣制备高分散纳米碳酸钙[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(S1): 346-352.
	WANG Chao, YANG Baojun, ZHOU Jingang, et al. Preparation of highly dispersed nano calcium carbonate from calcium carbide residue[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(S1): 346-352.
9	孙荣岳, 叶江明, 毕小龙, 等. 丙酸改性提高电石渣捕集CO₂性能的动力学分析[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(6): 2325-2330.
	SUN Rongyue, YE Jiangming, BI Xiaolong, et al. Kinetic analysis on CO₂ capture performance of carbide slag modified by propionic acid[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(6): 2325-2330.
10	马晓彤, 李英杰, 王文静, 等. 间歇氯化对电石渣循环捕集CO₂性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(12): 5268-5275.
	MA Xiaotong, LI Yingjie, WANG Wenjing, et al. Effect of indirect chlorination on cyclic CO₂ capture performance of carbide slag[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(12): 5268-5275.
11	ZHANG Junqiang, WANG Zhishuai, LI Tong, et al. Preparation of CaO-containing carbon pellet from recycling of carbide slag: effects of temperature and H₃PO₄ [J]. Waste Management, 2019, 84: 64-73.
12	NIU Shengli, LIU Mengqi, LU Chunmei, et al. Thermogravimetric analysis of carbide slag[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2014, 115(1): 73-79.
13	LI Yingjie, WANG Wenjing, CHENG Xingxing, et al. Simultaneous CO₂/HCl removal using carbide slag in repetitive adsorption/desorption cycles[J]. Fuel, 2015, 142: 21-27.
14	WU Shuimu, LI Yingjie, ZHAO Jianli, et al. Simultaneous CO₂/SO₂ adsorption performance of carbide slag in adsorption/desorption cycles[J]. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2016, 94(1): 33-40.
15	YANG Jie, LIU Shengyu, MA Liping, et al. Mechanism analysis of carbide slag capture of CO₂ via a gas-liquid-solid three-phase fluidization system[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 279: 123712.
16	YOU Quan, WU Shiyong, WU Youqing, et al. Product distributions and characterizations for integrated mild-liquefaction and carbonization of low rank coals[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2017, 156: 54-61.
17	AIL S S, DASAPPA S. Biomass to liquid transportation fuel via Fischer Tropsch synthesis-technology review and current scenario[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 58: 267-286.
18	WU Weize, HAN Buxing, GAO Haixiang, et al. Desulfurization of flue gas: SO₂ absorption by an ionic liquid[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2004, 43(18): 2415-2417.
19	MOTA A, VICENTE A A, TEIXEIRA J. Effect of spent grains on flow regime transition in bubble column[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66(14): 3350-3357.
20	SONG H S, RAMKRISHNA D, TRINH S, et al. Multiplicity and sensitivity analysis of Fischer-Tropsch bubble column slurry reactors: plug-flow gas and well-mixed slurry model[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2003, 58(12): 2759-2766.
21	BARGHI S, PRAKASH A, MARGARITIS A, et al. Flow regime identification in a slurry bubble column from gas holdup and pressure fluctuations analysis[J]. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2004, 82(5): 865-870.
22	JHAWAR A K, PRAKASH A. Heat transfer in a slurry bubble column reactor: a critical overview[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(4): 1464-1473.
23	CHANG E E, PAN Shuyuan, CHEN Y H, et al. CO₂ sequestration by carbonation of steelmaking slags in an autoclave reactor[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 195: 107-114.
24	COSTA G, BACIOCCHI R, POLETTINI A, et al. Current status and perspectives of accelerated carbonation processes on municipal waste combustion residues[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2007, 135(1/2/3): 55-75.
25	LI Xiaomin, BERTOS M F, HILLS C D, et al. Accelerated carbonation of municipal solid waste incineration fly ashes[J]. Waste Management, 2007, 27(9): 1200-1206.
26	HUIJGEN W J J, WITKAMP G J, COMANS R N J. Mechanisms of aqueous wollastonite carbonation as a possible CO₂ sequestration process[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2006, 61(13): 4242-4251.
27	TAN Wenyi, ZHANG Zixin, LI Hongyi, et al. Carbonation of gypsum from wet flue gas desulfurization process: experiments and modeling[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2017, 24(9): 8602-8608.
28	DING Wenjin, YANG Huaming, OUYANG Jing. Mineral carbonation of a desulfurization residue for CO₂ sequestration[J]. RSC Advances, 2015, 5(82): 67184-67194.
29	LI Ruibing, ZHANG Ting’an, LIU Yan, et al. Characteristics of red mud slurry flow in carbonation reactor[J]. Powder Technology, 2017, 311: 66-76.
30	KANTARCI N, BORAK F, ULGEN K O. Bubble column reactors[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2005, 40(7): 2263-2283.
31	WANG Tiefeng, WANG Jinfu, JIN Yong. Slurry reactors for gas-to-liquid processes: a review[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2007, 46(18): 5824-5847.
32	LIU Weizao, TENG Liumei, ROHANI S, et al. CO₂ mineral carbonation using industrial solid wastes: a review of recent developments[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 416: 129093.
33	HUIJGEN W J J, COMANS R N J. Carbon dioxide sequestration by mineral carbonation: literature review[D]. Petten: Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands, 2003.
34	TAMILSELVI DANANJAYAN R R, KANDASAMY P, ANDIMUTHU R. Direct mineral carbonation of coal fly ash for CO₂ sequestration[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112: 4173-4182.
35	TEBBICHE I, PASQUIER L C, MERCIER G, et al. Thermally activated serpentine leaching under flue gas conditions in a bubble column reactor operated at ambient pressure and temperature[J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2020, 195: 105391.
36	CHANG E E, CHIU A C, PAN Shuyuan, et al. Carbonation of basic oxygen furnace slag with metalworking wastewater in a slurry reactor[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 12: 382-389.
37	FERNÁNDEZ BERTOS M, LI X, SIMONS S J R, et al. Investigation of accelerated carbonation for the stabilisation of MSW incinerator ashes and the sequestration of CO₂ [J]. Green Chem, 2004, 6(8): 428-436.
38	YADAV V S, PRASAD M, KHAN J, et al. Sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO₂) using red mud[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 176(1/2/3): 1044-1050.
39	HO H J, IIZUKA A, SHIBATA E, et al. CO₂ utilization via direct aqueous carbonation of synthesized concrete fines under atmospheric pressure[J]. ACS Omega, 2020, 5(26): 15877-15890.
40	LIU Rong, WANG Xiaolong, GAO Shiwang. CO₂ capture and mineralization using carbide slag doped fly ash[J]. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 2020, 10(1): 103-115.
41	SUN Jian, LIU Wenqiang, HU Yingchao, et al. Enhanced performance of extruded-spheronized carbide slag pellets for high temperature CO₂ capture[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 285: 293-303.
42	ALTINER M. Use of Taguchi approach for synthesis of calcite particles from calcium carbide slag for CO₂ fixation by accelerated mineral carbonation[J]. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 2019, 12(4): 531-540.
43	KITAMURA M, KONNO H, YASUI A, et al. Controlling factors and mechanism of reactive crystallization of calcium carbonate polymorphs from calcium hydroxide suspensions[J]. Journal of Crystal Growth, 2002, 236(1/2/3): 323-332.

水平	液固比A/mL?g^-1	浓度B/%	表观气速C/m?s^-1
-1	1	10	0.041
0	5	20	0.082
1	9	30	0.123

水平	液固比A/mL?g^-1	浓度B/%	表观气速C/m?s^-1
-1	1	10	0.041
0	5	20	0.082
1	9	30	0.123

实验	液固比A/mL?g^-1	浓度B/%	表观气速C/m?s^-1	碳酸化效率Y/%
2	9	10	0.082	92.17
1	1	10	0.082	52.01
6	9	20	0.041	93.17
12	5	30	0.123	88.53
14	5	20	0.082	87.00
17	5	20	0.082	90.01
5	1	20	0.041	51.04
3	1	30	0.082	61.04
11	5	10	0.123	71.49
4	9	30	0.082	90.36
7	1	20	0.123	66.89
8	9	20	0.123	89.89
9	5	10	0.041	78.26
16	5	20	0.082	92.3
10	5	30	0.041	85.67
13	5	20	0.082	91.88
15	5	20	0.082	90.71

实验	液固比A/mL?g^-1	浓度B/%	表观气速C/m?s^-1	碳酸化效率Y/%
2	9	10	0.082	92.17
1	1	10	0.082	52.01
6	9	20	0.041	93.17
12	5	30	0.123	88.53
14	5	20	0.082	87.00
17	5	20	0.082	90.01
5	1	20	0.041	51.04
3	1	30	0.082	61.04
11	5	10	0.123	71.49
4	9	30	0.082	90.36
7	1	20	0.123	66.89
8	9	20	0.123	89.89
9	5	10	0.041	78.26
16	5	20	0.082	92.3
10	5	30	0.041	85.67
13	5	20	0.082	91.88
15	5	20	0.082	90.71

方差来源	平方和	自由度	均方值	F值	P值	显著性
Model	3316.757	9	368.5286	28.33906	0.0001	显著
液固比A	2264.982	1	2264.982	174.1723	<0.0001
浓度B	125.3736	1	125.3736	9.640964	0.0172
表观气速C	9.37445	1	9.37445	0.720875	0.4239
AB	29.3764	1	29.3764	2.258983	0.1765
AC	91.48923	1	91.48923	7.035327	0.0328
BC	23.18423	1	23.18423	1.782818	0.2236
A²	519.948	1	519.948	39.9829	0.0004
B²	121.5316	1	121.5316	9.345522	0.0184
C²	68.04379	1	68.04379	5.232423	0.0560
残差	91.02983	7	13.00426
失拟误差	73.42323	3	24.47441	5.56028	0.0654	不显著
纯误差	17.6066	4	4.40165
总和	3407.787	16