不同中空纤维膜材料对烟气中二氧化硫的吸收性能影响

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2019-1607

化工进展 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8): 3205-3212.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2019-1607

不同中空纤维膜材料对烟气中二氧化硫的吸收性能影响

杨超鹏¹^,²^,³(), 刘杰¹^,²^,³(), 史宏达¹, 纪志永¹^,²^,³, 赵颖颖¹^,²^,³, 袁俊生¹^,²^,³()

^1.河北工业大学化工学院，天津 300130
^2.海水资源高效利用化工技术教育部工程研究中心，天津 300130
^3.河北省现代海洋化工协同创新中心，天津 300130

出版日期:2020-08-01 发布日期:2020-08-12
通讯作者: 刘杰,袁俊生
作者简介:杨超鹏（1985—），男，博士研究生，研究方向为烟气脱硫。E-mail：036300106@163.com。
基金资助:
河北省重点研发计划(18394008D);国家自然科学基金青年基金(21406051);河北工业大学优秀青年创新基金(201301)

Absorption properties of hollow fiber membranes of different materials for flue gas desulfurization

Chaopeng YANG¹^,²^,³(), Jie LIU¹^,²^,³(), Hongda SHI¹, Zhiyong JI¹^,²^,³, Yingying ZHAO¹^,²^,³, Junsheng YUAN¹^,²^,³()

^1.School of Chemical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China
^2.Engineering Research Center of Seawater Utilization of Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300130, China
^3.Modern Marine Chemical Collaborative Innovation Center of Hebei Province, Tianjin 300130, China

Online:2020-08-01 Published:2020-08-12
Contact: Jie LIU,Junsheng YUAN

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

膜法烟气脱硫能耗低、传质面积大、分离效率高，可以有效地解决传统塔器内的液泛、漏液、夹带等问题。本文采用自制的中空纤维膜接触器，通过改变烟气流量、水流量和水温对比了聚四氟乙烯（PTFE）、聚偏氟乙烯（PVDF）和聚丙烯（PP）这3种中空纤维膜对烟气中二氧化硫的吸收性能，并通过电镜和接触角仪表征，对比了3种膜的参数和疏水性。结果表明：在不同烟气流量、水量和水温下，3种膜的吸收性能都表现为PTFE＞PP＞PVDF，120min时二氧化硫吸收浓度，PTFE最大，是PP的1.68倍，是PVDF的4.62倍；烟气流量的改变对二氧化硫的吸收浓度有显著影响，当烟气流量由60mL/min提高到140mL/min时，120min时PTFE膜二氧化硫的吸收浓度提高了2.14倍；影响膜性能的主要因素为疏水性，PTFE浸泡前后的表面接触角为105°和97°，疏水性远大于PP和PVDF。PTFE中空纤维膜孔径大、孔隙率高，具有极强的疏水性，在烟气脱硫及相关吸收过程中表现出较好的应用前景。

关键词: 膜, 吸收, 二氧化硫, 烟气

Abstract:

Flue gas desulfurization with membrane has low energy consumption, large mass transfer area and high separation efficiency, which can effectively solve the problems of liquid flooding, liquid leakage and entrainment in traditional towers. The absorption performances of FTEE, PVDF and PP hollow fiber membranes applied in sulfur dioxide absorption were compared by a self-made membrane contactor. The effects of flue gas flow rate, water flow rate and water temperature in different membrane were investigated. The membrane parameters and hydrophobicity of these three membranes were detected and compared by scanning electron microscope and contact angle measuring instrument. The absorption performances of three membranes were in ascending order of PTFE＞PP＞PVDF under all the different conditions. In terms of the absorption concentration of sulfur dioxide in 120min, the maximum ratio of PTFE to PP was 1.68∶1, and the maximum ratio of PTFE to PVDF was 4.62∶1. The change of gas flow had a significant effect on the absorption of sulfur dioxide. When the flue gas flow rate increased from 60mL/min to 140mL/min, the absorption capacity of PTFE was obviously enhanced, and in 120min, the absorption concentration of sulfur dioxide increased by 2.14 times. The hydrophobicity was the main parameter that affected membrane performance. The surface contact angles of PTFE before and after immersion were 105° and 97°, respectively, and the hydrophobicity was much stronger than PP and PVDF. Among all, PTFE hollow fiber membrane had large pore size, high porosity, high hydrophobicity. Especially its good temperature resistance could highly reduce the cooling procedure of flue gas. These advantages made it a good application prospect in flue gas desulfurization process.

Key words: membranes, adsorption, sulfur dioxide, flue gas

中图分类号:

TQ111.16

杨超鹏, 刘杰, 史宏达, 纪志永, 赵颖颖, 袁俊生. 不同中空纤维膜材料对烟气中二氧化硫的吸收性能影响[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(8): 3205-3212.

Chaopeng YANG, Jie LIU, Hongda SHI, Zhiyong JI, Yingying ZHAO, Junsheng YUAN. Absorption properties of hollow fiber membranes of different materials for flue gas desulfurization[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(8): 3205-3212.

参考文献

1	TUTSAK E, KOCAK M. High time-resolved measurements of water-soluble sulfate, nitrate and ammonium in PM_2.5 and their precursor gases over the eastern mediterranean[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 672: 212-226.
2	ZHANG R, JING J, TAO J, et al. Chemical characterization and source apportionment of PM_2.5 in Beijing: seasonal perspective[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2013, 13(14): 7053-7074.
3	DINDORE V Y, BRILMAN D W F, FERON P H M, et al. CO₂ absorption at elevated pressures using a hollow fiber membrane contactor[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2004, 235(1/2): 99-109.
4	LI J L, CHEN B H. Review of CO₂ absorption using chemical solvents in hollow fiber membrane contactors[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2005, 41(2): 109-122.
5	孙海敏, 刘飞妮, 张国亮, 等. 环境化工中的气/液膜接触分离过程及其特性[J]. 化工进展, 2008, 27(6): 861-866.
5	SONG Haimin，LIU Feini，ZHANG Guoliang，et al. Characteristics of membrane contactors used in waste gas/liquid separation[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2008, 27(6): 861-866.
6	MANSOURIZADEH A, ISMAIL A F. Hollow fiber gas-liquid membrane contactors for acid gas capture: a review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 171(1): 38-53.
7	韩永嘉, 王树立, 李辉, 等. 聚丙烯中空纤维膜吸收法烟气脱硫实验研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2011, 34(1): 155-158.
7	HAN Y J, WANG S L, LI H, et al. Experimental study on removing SO₂ from flue gas by PP hollow fiber contactors[J]. Enuivonmental Science and Technology, 2011, 34(1): 155-158.
8	SUN X, MENG F, YANG F. Application of seawater to enhance SO₂ removal from simulated flue gas through hollow fiber membrane contactor[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 312(1/2): 6-14.
9	LOVINGER A J. Poly(vinylidene fluoride), in developments in crystalline polymers-1[M]. Bassett D C, ed. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1982: 195-273.
10	LI K, WANG D, KOE C C, et al. Use of asymmetric hollow fibre modules for elimination of H₂S from gas streams via a membrane absorption method[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1998, 53(6): 1111-1119.
11	LI K, KONG J F, WANG D, et al. Tailor-made asymmetric PVDF hollow fibers for soluble gas removal[J]. AIChE Journal, 1999, 45(6): 1211-1219.
12	WANG D, TEO W K, LI K. Removal of H₂S to ultra-low concentrations using an asymmetric hollow fibre membrane module[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2002, 27(1): 33-40.
13	WANG D, TEO W K, LI K. Selective removal of trace H₂S from gas streams containing CO₂ using hollow fibre membrane modules/contractors[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2004, 35(2): 125-131.
14	PARK H H, DESHWAL B R, KIM I W, et al. Absorption of SO₂ from flue gas using PVDF hollow fiber membranes in a gas-liquid contactor[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 319(1): 29-37.
15	LEE H K, PARK H H, JO H D, et al. Absorption of SO₂ using PVDF hollow fiber membranes with PEG as an additive[J]. The Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2007, 24(4): 693-697.
16	PARK H H, JO H D, KIM I W, et al. Preparation of PVDF hollow fiber membrane and absorption of SO₂ from flue gas using bench scale gas-liquid contactor[J]. Korean Chemical Engineering Research, 2008, 46(3): 521-528.
17	DEMONTIGNY D, TONTIWACHWUTHIKUL P, CHAKMA A. Using polypropylene and polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in a membrane contactor for CO₂ absorption[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 277(1/2): 99-107.
18	TEOH M M, CHUNG T S. Membrane distillation with hydrophobic macrovoid-free PVDF-PTFE hollow fiber membranes[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2009, 66(2): 229-236.
19	杨敏, 王祖武, 汤金花, 等. 聚四氟乙烯微孔膜脱硫实验研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2005, 28(5): 14-15, 53.
19	YANG Min, WANG Zuwu, TANG Jinhua, et al. Experimental study of desulphurization by PTFE microporous membrane[J]. Enuivonmental Science and Technology, 2005, 28(5): 14-15, 53.
20	HAN Y, WANG S, LI H, et al. Experimental study on refinery gas desulfurization using gas-liquid membrane contactor[J]. China Petroleum Processing & Petrochemical Technology, 2009(3): 33-38.
21	孟宪泽, 袁俊生, 李积慧. 离子色谱法同时测定脱硫海水中的SO₄^2-和SO₃^2-[J]. 分析科学学报, 2018, 34(2): 294-296.
21	MENG Xianze, YUAN Junsheng, LI Jihui. Simultaneous determination of sulfate and sulfite in seawater by ion chromatography[J]. Journal of Analytical Science, 2018, 34(2): 294-296.
22	贾绍义，柴诚敬. 化工传质与分离过程[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2007: 344-345.
22	JIA Shaoyi, CHAI Chengjing. Mass transfer and separation process in chemical engineering[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2007: 344-345.

[1]	李季桐, 王刚, 熊亚选, 徐钱. 不同工质单效吸收式制冷系统的能量和㶲分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 104-112.
[2]	杨寒月, 孔令真, 陈家庆, 孙欢, 宋家恺, 王思诚, 孔标. 微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器脱碳性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 197-204.
[3]	谢璐垚, 陈崧哲, 王来军, 张平. 用于SO₂去极化电解制氢的铂基催化剂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 299-309.
[4]	张祚群, 高扬, 白超杰, 薛立新. 二次界面聚合同步反扩散原位生长ZIF-8纳米粒子制备聚酰胺混合基质反渗透（RO）膜[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 364-373.
[5]	张凤岐, 崔成东, 鲍学伟, 朱炜玄, 董宏光. 胺液吸收-分步解吸脱硫工艺的设计与评价[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 518-528.
[6]	潘宜昌, 周荣飞, 邢卫红. 高效分离同碳数烃的先进微孔膜：现状与挑战[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3926-3942.
[7]	李雪佳, 李鹏, 李志霞, 晋墩尚, 郭强, 宋旭锋, 宋芃, 彭跃莲. 亲水和疏水改性膜的抗结垢和润湿能力的对比[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4458-4464.
[8]	徐杰, 夏隆博, 罗平, 邹栋, 仲兆祥. 面向膜蒸馏过程的全疏膜制备及其应用进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3943-3955.
[9]	王报英, 王皝莹, 闫军营, 汪耀明, 徐铜文. 聚合物包覆膜在金属分离回收中的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3990-4004.
[10]	张雪伟, 黄亚继, 许月阳, 程好强, 朱志成, 李金壘, 丁雪宇, 王圣, 张荣初. 碱性吸附剂对燃煤烟气中SO₃的吸附特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3855-3864.
[11]	陆诗建, 刘苗苗, 杨菲, 张俊杰, 陈思铭, 刘玲, 康国俊, 李清方. 改良型CO₂湿壁塔内气液两相流动规律及传质特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3457-3467.
[12]	冯江涵, 宋钫. 阴离子交换膜电解池的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3501-3509.
[13]	陈香李, 李倩倩, 张甜, 李彪, 李康康. 自愈合油水分离膜的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3600-3610.
[14]	吕超, 张习文, 金理健, 杨林军. 新型两相吸收剂-离子液体系统高效捕获CO₂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3226-3232.
[15]	王保文, 刘同庆, 张港, 李炜光, 林德顺, 王梦家, 马晶晶. CuFe₂O₄改性脱硫渣氧载体与褐煤的反应特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2884-2894.

不同中空纤维膜材料对烟气中二氧化硫的吸收性能影响

Absorption properties of hollow fiber membranes of different materials for flue gas desulfurization

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价