微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器脱碳性能

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-1344

化工进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (S1): 197-204.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-1344

微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器脱碳性能

杨寒月¹^,²(), 孔令真¹^,², 陈家庆¹^,²(), 孙欢¹^,², 宋家恺¹^,², 王思诚¹^,², 孔标¹^,²

^1.北京石油化工学院环境工程系，北京 102617
^2.深水油气管线关键技术与装备北京市重点实验室，北京 102617

收稿日期:2023-08-07 修回日期:2023-10-11 出版日期:2023-10-25 发布日期:2023-11-30
通讯作者: 陈家庆
作者简介:杨寒月（1996—），女，硕士研究生，研究方向为环保多相流高效分离技术与设备。E-mail：271336848@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年基金(21808015);中国石油化工股份有限公司科研项目(322040);北京市教委科技计划一般项目(KM202210017009)

Decarbonization performance of downflow tubular gas-liquid contactor of microbubble-type

YANG Hanyue¹^,²(), KONG Lingzhen¹^,², CHEN Jiaqing¹^,²(), SUN Huan¹^,², SONG Jiakai¹^,², WANG Sicheng¹^,², KONG Biao¹^,²

^1.Department of Environmental Engineering, Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology, Beijing 102617, China
^2.Beijing Key Laboratory of Pipeline Critical Technology and Equipment for Deepwater Oil & Gas Development, Beijing 102617, China

Received:2023-08-07 Revised:2023-10-11 Online:2023-10-25 Published:2023-11-30
Contact: CHEN Jiaqing

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器是一种下行并流气液接触传质设备，通过射流气泡发生器产生的高密度微气泡来强化传质，具有结构紧凑、气液接触面积大和传质效率高等优点。基于微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器性能实验测试平台和CO₂-N₂混合气体体系，首先考察了泵入液量对压降和最大自然吸气量的影响，在此基础上探究了不同操作参数和结构参数对其脱碳性能的影响。结果表明，微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器采用高速液体射流负压吸气，压降和最大自然吸气量都随着泵入液量的增大而增大，当泵入液量为14L/min时，最大自然吸气量随着柱体长度的增加而在12.5~14L/min范围内波动；泵入液量在从4L/min增大到14L/min过程中，压降由20kPa增大到300kPa；传质段长度变化对CO₂脱除率的影响较小，液气比和鼔入气量对其影响较大，CO₂脱除率随着鼔入气量的增大而逐渐减小，随着液气比的增大而逐渐升高；CO₂脱除率随MDEA溶液浓度的增大而增大，且MDEA溶液浓度随循环次数增加而减小，在循环使用三次后吸收能力显著降低。自主设计的微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器脱碳性能较好，CO₂脱除率最高可达99%以上。

关键词: 下向流管式气液接触器, 气液吸收, 气液混合, 强化传质, 微气泡, 二氧化碳

Abstract:

The micro bubble downflow tubular gas-liquid contactor is a kind of downward co-current gas-liquid contact mass transfer equipment. It enhances mass transfer by absorbing high-density micro bubbles generated by the high-speed liquid jet of the jet bubble generator, which has the advantages of compact structure, large gas-liquid contact area, and high mass transfer efficiency. Based on the performance experimental testing platform of a micro bubble downflow tubular gas-liquid contactor and the CO₂-N₂ mixed gas system, the effects of pump liquid volume on pressure drop and maximum natural suction capacity were first investigated. On this basis, the effects of different operational and structural parameters on its decarbonization performance were explored. The results showed that the micro bubble downflow tubular gas-liquid contactor adopted high-speed liquid jet negative pressure suction, the pressure drop and maximum natural suction capacity increased with the increase of liquid volume. When the liquid volume was 14L/min, the maximum natural suction capacity fluctuated within the range of 12.5—14L/min with the increase of column length; during the process of increasing the liquid volume from 4L/min to 14L/min, the pressure drop increased from 20kPa to 300kPa. The change in the length of the mass transfer section had a relatively small impact on the CO₂ removal rate, while the liquid to gas ratio and the inlet gas volume had a greater impact. The CO₂ removal rate increased with the increase of MDEA solution concentration, and the MDEA solution concentration decreased with the increase of cycle times. After three cycles of use, the absorption capacity significantly decreased. The self-designed micro bubble downflow tubular gas-liquid contactor had good decarbonization performance, with a maximum CO₂ removal rate of over 99%.

Key words: downflow tubular gas-liquid contactor, gas-liquid absorption, gas-liquid mixing, enhanced mass transfer, microbubble, carbon dioxide

中图分类号:

TQ021.1

杨寒月, 孔令真, 陈家庆, 孙欢, 宋家恺, 王思诚, 孔标. 微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器脱碳性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 197-204.

YANG Hanyue, KONG Lingzhen, CHEN Jiaqing, SUN Huan, SONG Jiakai, WANG Sicheng, KONG Biao. Decarbonization performance of downflow tubular gas-liquid contactor of microbubble-type[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 197-204.

图/表 11

图1 微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器脱碳传质性能测试实验平台相关示意图

图2 文丘里射流气泡发生器的结构示意图

表1 微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器的主要结构尺寸

结构	尺寸
吸入室高度h₁ /mm	20
吸入室直径d₁ /mm	30
喷嘴直径d₂ /mm	4
喉管长度h₂ /mm	25
喉管直径d₃ /mm	7
扩散段角度α/(°)	8
柱体直径d₄ /mm	20
管式反应柱体长度/mm	400
管式气液接触器总长/mm	517.25

图3 微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器内两相流分析

图4 不同管式反应柱体长度下压降随泵入液量的变化情况

图5 不同管式反应柱体长度下最大自然吸气量随泵入液量的变化情况

图6 鼔入气量对微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器脱碳性能的影响

图7 液气比对微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器脱碳性能的影响

图8 MDEA浓度对微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器脱碳性能的影响

图9 MDEA浓度和pH随脱碳循环次数的变化

图10 传质段长度对微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器脱碳性能的影响

参考文献 18

1	向勇, 原玉, 周佩, 等. 碳捕集利用与封存中的金属腐蚀问题研究：进展与挑战[J]. 中国工程科学, 2023, 25(3): 197-208.
	XIANG Yong, YUAN Yu, ZHOU Pei, et al. Metal corrosion in carbon capture, utilization, and storage: Progress and challenges[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2023, 25(3): 197-208.
2	张志炳, 田洪舟, 张锋, 等. 多相反应体系的微界面强化简述[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(1): 44-49.
	ZHANG Zhibing, TIAN Hongzhou, ZHANG Feng, et al. Overview of microinterface intensification in multiphase reaction systems[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(1): 44-49.
3	张志炳, 田洪舟, 王丹亮, 等. 气液反应体系相界面传质强化研究[J]. 化学工程, 2016, 44(3): 1-8.
	ZHANG Zhibing, TIAN Hongzhou, WANG Danliang, et al. Intensification of interfacial mass transfer in gas-liquid reaction systems[J]. Chemical Engineering (China), 2016, 44(3): 1-8.
4	汪小伏, 于志家, 何仁. 喷射式气-液反应器的型式及应用[J]. 化学工业与工程技术, 2002, 23(2): 36-39, 0.
	WANG Xiaofu, YU Zhijia, HE Ren. Style and application of jet gas-liquid reactors[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry & Engineering, 2002, 23(2): 36-39, 0.
5	钟秦, 黄俊, 王婷茹, 等. 喷射鼓泡烟气脱硫(Ⅰ)——化学吸收工艺的研究[J]. 南京理工大学学报, 1997, 21(5): 419-422.
	ZHONG Qin, HUANG Jun, WANG Tingru, et al. Jet bubbling flue gas desulfurization (Ⅰ)—A study of chemical absorption technology[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 1997, 21(5): 419-422.
6	王娟, 钟秦. 喷射鼓泡反应器湿法烟气脱硫的研究[J]. 重庆环境科学, 2000(3): 32-34.
	WANG Juan, ZHONG Qin. Study of wet flue gas desulfurization for a jet bubbling reactor[J]. Chongqing Environmental Science, 2000(3): 32-34.
7	王娟, 钟秦. 喷射鼓泡反应器湿法烟气脱硫模型[J]. 南京理工大学学报, 2000, 24(4): 364-368.
	WANG Juan, ZHONG Qin. Model of wet flue gas desulfurization for a jet bubbling reactor[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2000, 24(4): 364-368.
8	朱晓帆. 软锰矿烟气脱硫研究[D]. 成都: 四川大学, 2002.
	ZHU Xiaofan. Study on flue gas desulfurization with pyrolusite pulp[D]. Chengdu: Sichuan University, 2002.
9	郭翠香, 朱晓帆, 蒋文举, 等. 软锰矿烟气脱硫资源化工艺研究[J]. 四川环境, 2002, 21(1): 27-31.
	GUO Cuixiang, ZHU Xiaofan, JIANG Wenju, et al. Study on the technology of flue gas desulfurization by pyrolusite[J]. Sichuan Environment, 2002, 21(1): 27-31.
10	朱晓帆, 刘若冰, 蒋文举, 等. 喷射鼓泡反应器在软锰矿烟气脱硫中的应用[J]. 环境工程, 2003, 21(1): 47-49.
	ZHU Xiaofan, LIU Ruobing, JIANG Wenju, et al. Application of jet bubbling reactor to flue gas desulfuration by pyrolusite pulp[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2003, 21(1): 47-49.
11	孙世利, 朱晓帆, 苏仕军, 等. 用喷射鼓泡反应器进行烟气脱硫[J]. 化工环保, 2005, 25(4): 323-326.
	SUN Shili, ZHU Xiaofan, SU Shijun, et al. Flue gas desulfurization(FGD) in jet bubble reactor(JBR)[J]. Environmental Protection of Chemical Industry, 2005, 25(4): 323-326.
12	KUNDU Gautam, MUKHERJEE Dibyendu, MITRA Arun K. Ejector performance in a co-current gas-liquid downflow bubble column[J]. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1997, 75(5): 956-963.
13	MANDAL Ajay, KUNDU Gautam, MUKHERJEE Dibyendu. Interfacial area and liquid-side volumetric mass transfer coefficient in a downflow bubble column[J]. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2008, 81(2): 212-219.
14	MANDAL A, KUNDU G, MUKHERJEE D. A comparative study of gas holdup, bubble size distribution and interfacial area in a downflow bubble column[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2005, 83(4): 423-428.
15	MAJUMDER Subrata Kumar, KUNDU Gautam, MUKHERJEE Dibyendu. Bubble size distribution and gas-liquid interfacial area in a modified downflow bubble column[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2006, 122(1/2): 1-10.
16	SIVAIAH Mekala, MAJUMDER Subrata Kumar. Mass transfer and mixing in an ejector-induced downflow slurry bubble column[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(35): 12661-12671.
17	GOSHIKA Bharath Kumar, MAJUMDER Subrata Kumar. Entrainment and holdup of gas-liquid-liquid dispersion in a downflow gas-liquid-liquid contactor[J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 2018, 125: 112-123.
18	陆诗建, 李清方, 张建. 醇胺溶液吸收二氧化碳方法及反应原理概述[J]. 科技创新导报, 2009, 6(13): 4-5, 7.
	LU Shijian, LI Qingfang, ZHANG Jian. Overview of CO₂ absorption with organic amines solution and reaction theory[J]. Science and Technology Innovation Herald, 2009, 6(13): 4-5, 7.

[1]	盛维武, 程永攀, 陈强, 李小婷, 魏嘉, 李琳鸽, 陈险峰. 微气泡和微液滴双强化脱硫反应器操作分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 142-147.
[2]	王胜岩, 邓帅, 赵睿恺. 变电吸附二氧化碳捕集技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 233-245.
[3]	时永兴, 林刚, 孙晓航, 蒋韦庚, 乔大伟, 颜彬航. 二氧化碳加氢制甲醇过程中铜基催化剂活性位点研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 287-298.
[4]	郑谦, 官修帅, 靳山彪, 张长明, 张小超. 铈锆固溶体Ce_0.25Zr_0.75O₂光热协同催化CO₂与甲醇合成DMC[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 319-327.
[5]	戴欢涛, 曹苓玉, 游新秀, 徐浩亮, 汪涛, 项玮, 张学杨. 木质素浸渍柚子皮生物炭吸附CO₂特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 356-363.
[6]	孙玉玉, 蔡鑫磊, 汤吉海, 黄晶晶, 黄益平, 刘杰. 反应精馏合成甲基丙烯酸甲酯工艺优化及节能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 56-63.
[7]	王耀刚, 韩子姗, 高嘉辰, 王新宇, 李思琪, 杨全红, 翁哲. 铜基催化剂电还原二氧化碳选择性的调控策略[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4043-4057.
[8]	刘毅, 房强, 钟达忠, 赵强, 李晋平. Ag/Cu耦合催化剂的Cu晶面调控用于电催化二氧化碳还原[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4136-4142.
[9]	黄玉飞, 李子怡, 黄杨强, 金波, 罗潇, 梁志武. 光催化CO₂和CH₄重整催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4247-4263.
[10]	娄宝辉, 吴贤豪, 张驰, 陈臻, 冯向东. 纳米流体用于二氧化碳吸收分离研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3802-3815.
[11]	白亚迪, 邓帅, 赵睿恺, 赵力, 杨英霞. 变温吸附碳捕集机组标准化测试方案探讨及性能实验[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3834-3846.
[12]	顾诗亚, 董亚超, 刘琳琳, 张磊, 庄钰, 都健. 考虑中间节点的碳捕集管路系统设计与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2799-2808.
[13]	吕超, 张习文, 金理健, 杨林军. 新型两相吸收剂-离子液体系统高效捕获CO₂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3226-3232.
[14]	王科菊, 赵成, 胡晓玫, 云军阁, 魏凝涵, 姜雪迎, 邹昀, 陈志航. 金属氧化物低温催化氧化VOCs的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2402-2412.
[15]	马源, 肖晴月, 岳君容, 崔彦斌, 刘姣, 许光文. CeO₂-Al₂O₃复合载体负载Ni基催化剂催化CO _x 共甲烷化性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2421-2428.

微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器脱碳性能

Decarbonization performance of downflow tubular gas-liquid contactor of microbubble-type

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 18

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价