磁加载絮凝处理含铜废水

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2015.11.039

化工进展 ›› 2015, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 4065-4070.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2015.11.039

磁加载絮凝处理含铜废水

罗曼¹, 蔡旺锋¹, 陈益清², 张旭斌¹

1 天津大学化工学院, 天津 300072;
2 深圳职业技术学院建筑与环境工程学院, 广东深圳 518055

收稿日期:2015-04-17 修回日期:2015-05-03 出版日期:2015-11-05 发布日期:2015-11-05
通讯作者: 张旭斌,副教授,主要从事工业废水、废气处理方面的研究。E-mailtjzxb@tju.edu.cn。
作者简介:罗曼(1989—),女,硕士研究生,主要从事重金属工业废水处理方面的研究。
基金资助:
深圳市战略性新兴产业发展专项资金(ZDSY 20120619093952884)及深圳市南山区重点企业和创新机构扶持分项资金(KC2013ZDZJ0005A)项目。

Study on treatment of copper waste water by magnetic seeding flocculation

LUO Man¹, CAI Wangfeng¹, CHEN Yiqing², ZHANG Xubin¹

1 School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China;
2 School of Construction and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen Polytechnic, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China

Received:2015-04-17 Revised:2015-05-03 Online:2015-11-05 Published:2015-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目前磁加载絮凝技术已被研究用于处理多种类型的废水,然而关于此技术中磁粉作用机理方向少有报道。为了解决这一问题,本文采用磁加载絮凝法处理模拟微蚀铜废水,研究了磁粉的加入对Cu²⁺和浊度去除率、絮体沉降速率以及絮体粒径的影响,深入分析了磁粉的作用规律和机理,为磁加载絮凝法应用到实际工程中提供了理论依据和技术参数。结果表明,当磁粉投加量和粒径分别取2.0g/L和300～400目时,磁加载絮凝效果最好。此时,Cu²⁺和浊度去除率均达到最高值98.53%和94.72%,比传统絮凝法高出4.11%和0.61%;絮体沉降速率最快,达5cm/min,是传统絮凝沉降速率的3.64倍;絮体粒径D₅₀也达到最大值41.94μm,较传统絮体粒径大20μm。磁粉投加量过多或过少、粒径过大或过小都会相应地减慢磁絮体的生长速率。

关键词: 磁加载絮凝, 含铜废水, 粒度分布, 沉降, 分离

Abstract: Magnetic seeding flocculation(hereinafter referred to as MSF) has been studied and applied to various types of waste water treatment, but very few studies have been reported regarding magnetic seed mechanism. In order to solve this problem, MSF method was conducted in this study to simulate micro-etching copper waste water. This study compared the influences of dosing magnetic seed on removal rates of copper and turbidity, floc sedimentation rate or floc size, and analyzed the mechanism of magnetic seed effectiveness. The results showed that MSF reached its best performance at 2.0g/L and particle sizes between 300 and 400mesh. Under optimal conditions, the highest removal rates for copper and turbidity were 98.53% and 94.72%, 4.11% and 0.61% higher than traditional flocculation respectively; settling speed also reached its maximum of 5cm/min, 2.64times greater than traditional flocculation;and floc size D₅₀ also reached its maximum of 41.94μm, 20micrometers larger than traditional particle size. The above figures indicated that the floc growth rate was affected by magnetic seed dosage and particle size. This study provided theoretical and practical parameters for the application of MSF.

Key words: magnetic seeding flocculation, copper waste water, particle size distribution, sedimentation, separation

中图分类号:

TQ09

罗曼, 蔡旺锋, 陈益清, 张旭斌. 磁加载絮凝处理含铜废水[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(11): 4065-4070.

LUO Man, CAI Wangfeng, CHEN Yiqing, ZHANG Xubin. Study on treatment of copper waste water by magnetic seeding flocculation[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progree, 2015, 34(11): 4065-4070.

参考文献

[1] Ma A,Hadi P,Barford J,et al. Modified empty bed residence time model for copper removal[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research,2014,53(35):13773-13781.
[2] 孟勇,苏胜培,毛丽秋,等. 丙烯酰胺-丙烯酸-丙烯羟肟酸共聚物乳液脱除电镀废水中的重金属离子[J]. 化工进展,2009,28(11):2072-2075.
[3] 林梅莹,尚小琴,李淑妍,等. 氨基改性淀粉重金属废水处理剂的制备及应用[J]. 化工进展,2011,30(4):854-856.
[4] Ku Y,Jung I L. Photocatalytic reduction of Cr(Ⅵ) in aqueous solutions by UV irradiation with the presence of titanium dioxide[J]. Water Research,2001,35(1):135-142.
[5] Doula M K. Simultaneous removal of Cu,Mn and Zn from drinking water with the use of clinoptilolite and its Fe-modified form[J]. Water Research,2009,43(15):3659-3672.
[6] 张帆,李菁,谭建华,等. 吸附法处理重金属废水的研究进展[J]. 化工进展,2013,32(11):2749-2756.
[7] Heidmann I,Calmano W. Removal of Zn(Ⅱ),Cu(Ⅱ),Ni(Ⅱ),Ag(Ⅰ) and Cr(Ⅵ) present in aqueous solutions by aluminium electrocoagulation[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2008,152(3):934-941.
[8] Samper E,Rodríguez M,de la Rubia M A,et al. Removal of metal ions at low concentration by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS)[J]. Separation and Purification Technology,2009,65(3):337-342.
[9] Heredia J B,Martín J S. Removing heavy metals from polluted surface water with a tannin-based flocculant agent[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2009,165(1):1215-1218.
[10] Ma M. Enhancement of hematite flocculation in the hematite-starch-(low-molecular-weight) poly(acrylic acid) system[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research,2011,50(21):11950-11953.
[11] 曾慧峰,孙春宝,王然,等. 垃圾渗滤液的加载磁絮凝预处理工艺研究[J]. 环境工程学报,2011,10(5):2303-2306.
[12] 张帅,李军,陈瑜. 加载絮凝沉淀工艺在水处理中的应用[J]. 给水排水,2009(s1):274-278.
[13] Li Y,Wang J,Zhao Y,et al. Research on magnetic seeding flocculation for arsenic removal by superconducting magnetic separation[J]. Separation and Purification Technology,2010,73(2):264-270.
[14] 孙水裕,张俊浩,刘炳基,等. 磁种凝聚-磁分离技术处理含 Ni²⁺ 电镀废水的研究[J]. 环境工程,2002,2(4):l7.
[15] Stolarski M,Eichholz C,Fuchs B,et al. Sedimentation acceleration of remanent iron oxide by magnetic flocculation[J]. China Particuology,2007,5(1):145-150.
[16] Lipus L C,Krope J,Crepinsek L. Dispersion destabilization in magnetic water treatment[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science,2001,236(1):60-66.
[17] Yu J,Wang D,Ge X,et al. Flocculation of Kaolin particles by two typical polyelectrolytes:A comparative study on the kinetics and floc structures[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects,2006,290(1):288-294.

磁加载絮凝处理含铜废水

Study on treatment of copper waste water by magnetic seeding flocculation

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	贺美晋. 分子管理在炼油领域分离技术中的应用和发展趋势[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 260-266.
[2]	崔守成, 徐洪波, 彭楠. 两种MOFs材料用于O₂/He吸附分离的模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 382-390.
[3]	李世霖, 胡景泽, 王毅霖, 王庆吉, 邵磊. 电渗析分离提取高值组分的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 420-429.
[4]	郭强, 赵文凯, 肖永厚. 增强流体扰动强化变压吸附甲硫醚/氮气分离的数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 64-72.
[5]	廖志新, 罗涛, 王红, 孔佳骏, 申海平, 管翠诗, 王翠红, 佘玉成. 溶剂脱沥青技术应用与进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4573-4586.
[6]	王兰江, 梁瑜, 汤琼, 唐明兴, 李学宽, 刘雷, 董晋湘. 快速热解铂前体合成高分散的Pt/HY催化剂及其萘深度加氢性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4159-4166.
[7]	潘宜昌, 周荣飞, 邢卫红. 高效分离同碳数烃的先进微孔膜：现状与挑战[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3926-3942.
[8]	周龙大, 赵立新, 徐保蕊, 张爽, 刘琳. 电场-旋流耦合强化多相介质分离研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3443-3456.
[9]	陈香李, 李倩倩, 张甜, 李彪, 李康康. 自愈合油水分离膜的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3600-3610.
[10]	谢志伟, 吴张永, 朱启晨, 蒋佳骏, 梁天祥, 刘振阳. 植物油基Ni_0.5Zn_0.5Fe₂O₄磁流体的黏度特性及磁黏特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3623-3633.
[11]	娄宝辉, 吴贤豪, 张驰, 陈臻, 冯向东. 纳米流体用于二氧化碳吸收分离研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3802-3815.
[12]	周磊, 孙晓岩, 陶少辉, 陈玉石, 项曙光. 基于分离因数法的简捷炼油塔模型开发及应用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2819-2827.
[13]	吴和平, 曹宁, 徐圆圆, 曹云波, 李裕东, 杨强, 卢浩. 氢氟酸与烷基化油快速分离[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2845-2853.
[14]	宋民航, 赵立新, 徐保蕊, 刘琳, 张爽. 基于入口分散相重排序的旋流强化分离研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2219-2232.
[15]	赵尧, 周志辉, 吴红丹, 胡传智, 张国春, 吴睿鹏. Silicalite-1分子筛膜渗透蒸发条件的响应面分析与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2586-2594.