混合绝缘气体变温吸附分离回收SF6的数值模拟

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2024-2129

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

SF₆是一种重点控制的强温室气体。为了减少其排放，本文提出使用变温吸附（TSA）循环从混合绝缘气体中（SF₆的摩尔分数为15%，N₂的摩尔分数为85%）分离回收SF₆。采用数值模拟方法建立了TSA循环的物理模型和数学模型，与文献实验数据对比并证明了模型的可靠性。采用3种性能评价指标（纯度、回收率、比能耗），研究不同的吸附剂材料、吸附床几何尺寸和操作条件对TSA循环性能的影响。结果表明，4种材料的循环性能最好的是Mg-MOF-74，然后是AC、UIO-66、13X。吸附剂采用Mg-MOF-74，吸附床当量长径比在6.9~23.6内时，循环性能随长径比增大而提升，纯度和回收率最高分别可达到69.31%和62.90%，比能耗最低为1.89MJ/kg。降低吸附温度和升高解吸温度有利于增大材料的SF₆循环工作容量，对混合绝缘气体分离回收SF₆有利。

关键词: 六氟化硫, 吸附, 分离, 回收, 计算流体力学, 数值模拟

Abstract:

Sulfur hexafluoride (SF₆) is a strong greenhouse gas. To reduce its emission, this study proposed recovering SF₆ from mixed insulating gas (with 85% SF₆ and 15% N₂ mole fractions) using temperature swing adsorption (TSA) cycle. Numerical simulation was employed to establish the physical and mathematical models of the cycle, and the reliability of the model was verified through comparison with the experimental data in the literature. Three performance evaluation indices (purity, recovery and specific energy consumption) were used to investigate the effects of different adsorbent materials, geometric dimensions of adsorption bed and operating conditions on TSA cycle performance. The results showed that Mg-MOF-74 exhibited the best cycle performance, followed by AC, UIO-66 and 13X. For adsorption beds with equivalent length-to-diameter ratios ranging from 6.9 to 23.6, the cycle performance improved with increasing ratio, achieving maximum purity and recovery rates of 69.31% and 62.90%, respectively, and a minimum specific energy consumption of 1.89MJ/kg. Lower adsorption temperatures and higher desorption temperatures increased the SF₆ cyclic working capacity of adsorbents, thereby enhancing SF₆ recovery from mixed insulating gas.

Key words: sulfur hexafluoride (SF₆), adsorption, separation, recovery, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), numerical simulation

中图分类号:

X701

武锦怡, 赵睿恺, 邓帅, 张家麒, 高春霄, 刘葳桦, 赵力. 混合绝缘气体变温吸附分离回收SF₆的数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(S1): 19-28.

WU Jinyi, ZHAO Ruikai, DENG Shuai, ZHANG Jiaqi, GAO Chunxiao, LIU Weihua, ZHAO Li. Numerical simulation of temperature swing adsorption for SF₆ recovery from mixed insulating gas[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2025, 44(S1): 19-28.

图/表 20

参考文献 27

[27]	DING Zhaoyang, HAN Zhiyang, SHI Wenrong, et al. Analysis of dynamic effective mass transfer coefficients of rapid pressure swing adsorption process for oxygen production[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(2): 759-768.
[28]	彭荣. 多孔材料吸附储氢的CFD模拟与优化[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2012.
	PENG Rong. CFD modeling and optimization of adsorptive hydrogen storage in porous materials[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2012.
[29]	Rached BEN-MANSOUR, QASEM Naef A A, ANTAR Mohammed A. Carbon dioxide adsorption separation from dry and humid CO₂/N₂ mixture[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2018, 117: 221-235.
[1]	孙强, 杨典, 王芳, 等. 基于ASPEN PLUS的六氟化硫提纯工艺研究[J]. 云南化工, 2020, 47(9): 41-45.
	SUN Qiang, YANG Dian, WANG Fang, et al. Research on distillation of pure sulfur hexafluoride based on ASPEN PLUS[J]. Yunnan Chemical Technology, 2020, 47(9): 41-45.
[2]	REN Jiahao, CHANG Miao, ZENG Wenjiang, et al. Computer-aided discovery of MOFs with calixarene-analogous microenvironment for exceptional SF₆ capture[J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2021, 33(13): 5108-5114.
[3]	FANG Xuekun, HU Xia, Greet JANSSENS-MAENHOUT, et al. Sulfur hexafluoride (SF₆) emission estimates for China: An Inventory for 1990—2010 and a projection to 2020[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(8): 3848-3855.
[4]	中国气象局气候变化中心. 中国温室气体公报[R]. 北京: 中国气象局, 2023.
	China Meteorological Administration Climate Center. China greenhouse gas bulletin[R]. Beijing： China Meteorological Administration, 2023.
[5]	刘红志, 彭柯. 六氟化硫回收回充净化处理系统的应用研究[J]. 四川电力技术, 2011, 34(1): 52-55.
	LIU Hongzhi, PENG Ke. Research on the application of sulfur hexafluoride recovery and purification treatment system[J]. Sichuan Electric Power Technology. 2011, 34(1): 52-55.
[6]	ZHENG Xianqiang, SHEN Yanlong, WANG Shitao, et al. Selective adsorption of SF₆ in covalent- and metal-organic frameworks[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2021, 39: 88-95.
[7]	MOSLEH Soleiman, KHAKSAR Hadis. Cu-BDC MOF/CNFs hybrids for rapid CO₂ capture in a circulating fluidized bed via temperature swing adsorption process[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2024, 287:119773.
[8]	谢任禹, 雍觐源, 江龙, 等. 变湿吸附三维循环构建及能效分析[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2024, 45(9): 2593-2598.
	XIE Renyu, YONG Jinyuan, JIANG Long, et al. Construction of three-dimensional moisture swing adsorption cycle and energy efficiency analysis[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2024, 45(9): 2593-2598.
[9]	ZHAO Qinghu, WU Fan, HE Yingdian, et al. Impact of operating parameters on CO₂ capture using carbon monolith by electrical swing adsorption technology (ESA)[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 327: 441-453.
[10]	闫江文. 用于SF₆/N₂吸附分离的微孔MOFs的合成及其光响应研究[D]. 保定: 河北大学, 2024.
	YAN Jiangwen. Synthesis microporous MOFs for SF₆/N₂ adsorption separation and photoresponse[D]. Baoding: Hebei University, 2024.
[11]	CHEN Sirui, SHEN Yuanhui, GUAN Zhongbo, et al. Adsorption properties of SF₆ on zeolite NaY, 13X, activated carbon, and silica gel[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2020, 65(8): 4044-4051.
[12]	高春霄, 赵睿恺, 邓帅, 等. 混合绝缘气体变温吸附分离回收SF₆优化研究[J]. 低碳化学与化工, 2025, 50: 95-100.
	GAO Chunxiao, ZHAO Ruikai, DENG Shuai,et al. Optimization study of SF6 recovery from mixed insulating gases using temperatureswing adsorption[J]. Low-Carbon Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 2025, 50: 95-100.
[13]	LIU Lei, JIN Seongmin, Kwangjun KO, et al. Alkyl-functionalization of (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane-grafted zeolite beta for carbon dioxide capture in temperature swing adsorption[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 382: 122834.
[14]	HAN Bo, CHAKRABORTY Anutosh. Advanced cooling heat pump and desalination employing functional UiO-66 (Zr) metal-organic frameworks [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 213: 112825.
[15]	任可欣, 鲁军辉, 王随林, 等. 低湿CO₂/H₂O混合气体吸附特性实验[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(12): 6698-6710.
	REN Kexin, LU Junhui, WANG Suilin, et al. Adsorption characteristics of CO₂/H₂O with low humidity[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(12): 6698-6710.
[16]	Ammar ALI ABD, OTHMAN Mohd Roslee, SHAMSUDIN Ili Khairunnisa, et al. Biogas upgrading to natural gas pipeline quality using pressure swing adsorption for CO₂ separation over UiO-66: Experimental and dynamic modelling assessment[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023, 453: 139774.
[17]	CHEN Lijin, DENG Shuai, ZHAO Ruikai, et al. Temperature swing adsorption for CO₂ capture: Thermal design and management on adsorption bed with single-tube/three-tube internal heat exchanger[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2021, 199: 117538.
[18]	周圆圆, 杨华伟, 张东辉. 甲烷/氮气变压吸附分离的实验与模拟[J]. 天然气化工, 2011, 36(5): 21-27.
	ZHOU Yuanyuan, YANG Huawei, ZHANG Donghui. Simulation and experiment for the pressure swing adsorption separation of methane and nitrogen[J]. Natural Gas Chemical Industry, 2011, 36(5): 21-27.
[19]	LIAN Yahui, DENG Shuai, LI Shuangjun, et al. Numerical analysis on CO₂ capture process of temperature swing adsorption (TSA): Optimization of reactor geometry[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2019, 85: 187-198.
[20]	QASEM Naef A A, Rached BEN-MANSOUR. Energy and productivity efficient vacuum pressure swing adsorption process to separate CO₂ from CO₂/N₂ mixture using Mg-MOF-74: A CFD simulation[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 209: 190-202.
[21]	Jaehoon CHA, Seongbin GA, LEE Seung-Jun, et al. Integrated material and process evaluation of metal-organic frameworks database for energy-efficient SF₆/N₂ separation[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 426: 131787.
[22]	CHO Wan-Seon, LEE Kwang-Hoon, CHANG Hyang-Ja, et al. Evaluation of pressure-temperature swing adsorption for sulfur hexafluoride (SF₆) recovery from SF₆ and N₂ gas mixture[J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2011, 28(11): 2196-2201.
[23]	KIM Min-Bum, LEE Seung-Joon, LEE Chang Yeon, et al. High SF₆ selectivities and capacities in isostructural metal-organic frameworks with proper pore sizes and highly dense unsaturated metal sites[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2014, 190: 356-361.
[24]	YANG Xiaoxian, Arash ARAMI-NIYA, Jiafei LYU, et al. Net, excess, and absolute adsorption of N₂, CH₄, and CO₂ on metal-organic frameworks of ZIF-8, MIL-101(Cr), and UiO-66 at 282—361K and up to 12MPa[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2020, 66(1): 404-414.
[25]	ZHAO Ruikai, LIU Longcheng, ZHAO Li, et al. A comprehensive performance evaluation of temperature swing adsorption for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 114: 109285.
[26]	Rached BEN-MANSOUR, QASEM Naef A A. An efficient temperature swing adsorption (TSA) process for separating CO₂ from CO₂/N₂ mixture using Mg-MOF-74[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 156: 10-24.
[27]	丁兆阳, 韩治洋, 石文荣, 等. 快速变压吸附制氧动态传质系数模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(2): 759-768.

SF₆物性参数	数值
密度ρ_g/kg∙m^-3	6.07
摩尔质量M/g∙mol^-1	146.07
热导率k_g/W∙m^-1∙K^-1	0.014
比热容c_p_,g/J∙kg^-1∙K^-1	650
动力黏度μ/kg∙m^-1∙s^-1	1.58×10^-5

SF₆物性参数	数值
密度ρ_g/kg∙m^-3	6.07
摩尔质量M/g∙mol^-1	146.07
热导率k_g/W∙m^-1∙K^-1	0.014
比热容c_p_,g/J∙kg^-1∙K^-1	650
动力黏度μ/kg∙m^-1∙s^-1	1.58×10^-5

参数	数值
壁面厚度δ/m	0.001
密度ρ_w/kg∙m^-3	8030
比热容c_p_,w/J∙kg^-1∙K^-1	502.48

参数	数值
壁面厚度δ/m	0.001
密度ρ_w/kg∙m^-3	8030
比热容c_p_,w/J∙kg^-1∙K^-1	502.48

吸附剂性能	UIO-66^[15-16]	13X^[17]	AC^[18]	Mg-MOF-74^[19]
密度ρ_s/kg∙m^-3	380	1099.5	592	911
比热容c_p_,s/J∙kg^-1∙K^-1	750	920	887	900
孔隙率ε	0.246	0.565	0.36	0.7417
传热系数λ_s/W∙m^-1∙K^-1	0.32	0.15	0.3	0.3
颗粒直径d/mm	0.36	1	2	0.2
黏性阻力系数α^-1/m^-2	4.420×10¹⁰	1.574×10⁸	3.292×10⁸	6.132×10⁸
惯性阻力系数C₂/m^-1	4.924×10⁵	8.441×10³	2.401×10⁴	1.108×10⁴

混合绝缘气体变温吸附分离回收SF₆的数值模拟

Numerical simulation of temperature swing adsorption for SF₆ recovery from mixed insulating gas

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 20

参考文献 27

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

吸附剂材料	气体种类	q_m/mol·kg^-1	k₀/Pa^-1	n	ΔH/J·mol^-1
UIO-66	SF₆	1.81	2.92×10^-10	0.581	-38906
UIO-66	N₂	12.03	4.74×10^-10	0.57	-14582
13X	SF₆	1.546	9.402×10^-10	1.053	-26173
13X	N₂	1.014	2.26×10^-8	0.4376	-13360
AC	SF₆	4.765	6.995×10^-12	0.440	-42193
AC	N₂	9.74	6.91×10^-10	0.518	-16310
Mg-MOF-74	SF₆	6.565	3.206×10^-11	1.849	-34444
Mg-MOF-74	N₂	6.7072	9.36×10^-10	1	-18000

参数	UIO-66	13X	AC	Mg-MOF-74
SF₆吸附时间常数/s^-1	0.1	0.1	0.1	0.1
N₂吸附时间常数/s^-1	0.15^[28]	0.6^[29]	0.2^[18]	0.313^[22]

[1]	尹晓云, 朱进, 刘春艳, 张锦涛, 徐源, 朱英如, 苏明, 孙月, 孙杰, 袁颖. 基于PB设计和响应面法的CPS硫黄回收装置能量优化[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(S1): 124-133.
[2]	符红梅, 刘定华, 刘晓勤. MOF材料在芳烃同分异构体分离中的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(9): 5006-5017.
[3]	张文静, 黄致新, 李士腾, 邓帅, 李双俊. 生物质碳气凝胶CO₂吸附剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(9): 5018-5032.
[4]	洪凯, 樊欢, 田佳, 张荥斐. 硫化沉淀法处理铜砷多金属酸性废水研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(9): 5301-5314.
[5]	杜璇, 王战宏, 郑彬, 许卫, 王硕, 石鹏, 高国. 钴铁酸浸液分离及电池级磷酸铁回收技术进展[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(9): 5327-5338.
[6]	孙梦圆, 陆诗建, 刘玲, 薛艳阳, 张云蓉, 董琦, 康国俊. 金属有机框架及衍生物在碳捕集领域的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(9): 5339-5350.
[7]	王晓光, 董青, 郎文丽, 洪翔鑫, 黄振祥, 谭凤玉, 雷以柱, 余子夷. 超低浓度甲烷减排与资源化利用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(9): 5363-5376.
[8]	段先哲, 毕文婷, 李南, 豆佳乐, 邵冰清, 汪佳伟, 吴鹏, 黄欢, 唐振平. 数值模拟在高放废物处置中的应用：放射性核素迁移机制及其影响因素[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(9): 5391-5405.
[9]	鲁玲, 俞磊, 顾霞, 赖敏明, 周凯, 王亚鹏, 李响. 制药废盐的高效热催化处理及资源化利用[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(9): 5432-5441.
[10]	张光辉, 江金旭, 黄磊, 陈士祥, 马天添. 市政污泥富氧燃烧特性影响因素分析及预测[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(9): 5460-5470.
[11]	周敬皓, 张朝阳, 胡昊星, 王思茗, 刘静远, 魏光华. 基于格子玻尔兹曼方法的PEMFC微孔层气体传质分析[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(9): 4898-4907.
[12]	王吉龙, 何磊, 苏毅, 唐昭帆. 基于尾气焚烧炉膛天然气无焰燃烧（MILD）数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(9): 4928-4936.
[13]	翟宇航, 丛立新, 韩冰, 王启林, 邹慧传. 大尺度氢气云爆燃压力波形成机制及灾害效应判定[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(8): 4709-4719.
[14]	汪国超, 丁晖殿, 师丽, 李强, 夏涛, 苑杨. 复合精馏序列的温度推断控制[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(8): 4720-4731.
[15]	杨勇, 张钊, 王东亮, 周怀荣, 赵子豪, 李煜坤. 二甲苯异构体不同分离策略的技术经济评价[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(8): 4732-4740.