稠油水环输送管道再启动压降特性分析

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-2281

化工进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 5669-5679.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-2281

稠油水环输送管道再启动压降特性分析

尹晓云¹^,²(), 付林浩¹^,², 李佳忆³, 程思杰¹^,², 敬加强⁴^,⁵(), MASTOBAEV Boris N⁶, 孙杰⁴^,⁵

^1.中国石油西南油气田分公司安全环保与技术监督研究院，四川成都 610041
^2.页岩气评价与开采四川省重点实验室，四川成都 610041
^3.国家管网集团西南管道有限责任公司贵州省管网有限公司，四川成都 610000
^4.西南石油大学石油与天然气工程学院，四川成都 610500
^5.油气消防四川省重点实验室，四川成都 611731
^6.Department of Transport and Storage of Oil and Gas, UFA State Petroleum Technological University, Russia UFA 450062

收稿日期:2022-12-09 修回日期:2023-03-01 出版日期:2023-11-20 发布日期:2023-12-15
通讯作者: 敬加强
作者简介:尹晓云（1995—），女，博士，工程师，研究方向为油气集输多相流、油气田节能减排。E-mail：yinxy0122@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(U19B2012)

Analysis of restart-up pressure drop characteristics of heavy oil-water ring transportation pipeline

YIN Xiaoyun¹^,²(), FU Linhao¹^,², LI Jiayi³, CHENG Sijie¹^,², JING Jiaqiang⁴^,⁵(), MASTOBAEV Boris N⁶, SUN Jie⁴^,⁵

^1.Safety, Environment and Technology Supervision Research Institute of PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China
^2.Shale Gas Evaluation and Exploitation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China
^3.Pipeline Co. , Ltd. of Guizhou Province, PipeChina Southwest Pipeline Co. , Ltd. , Chengdu 610000, China
^4.School of Oil & Natural Gas Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, Sichuan, China
^5.Oil & Gas Fire Protection Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 611731, Sichuan, China
^6.Department of Transport and Storage of Oil and Gas, UFA State Petroleum Technological University, 450062, UFA, Russia

Received:2022-12-09 Revised:2023-03-01 Online:2023-11-20 Published:2023-12-15
Contact: JING Jiaqiang

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对稠油水环输送管线因水环失稳破坏需重新启动的问题，基于自行研发设计的室内小型再启动环道模拟实验装置，以旅大油田四种普通稠油为研究对象，实验研究了稠油水环输送管道停输后以恒定水流量重新启动时，其再启动压降随时间的变化规律，讨论了持油率、油品黏度、停输时间及恒定水流速度对再启动压降的影响，应用IBM SPSS软件对正交再启动实验结果进行回归分析，建立再启动压降多元非线性回归模型，并通过192组实验数据验证其预测可靠性。实验结果表明：再启动压降随时间的变化可划分为压降衰减和压降恒定两个阶段；再启动压降与持油率、油品黏度、停输时间及恒定水流速度都呈正相关关系，但持油率与恒定水流速度的影响最显著；再启动压降的模型预测值与实验测量值吻合较好，其相对误差均在±10%范围以内。

关键词: 稠油, 水环, 再启动压降, 正交实验, 回归模型

Abstract:

Aiming at the problem of restart-up for heavy oil-water ring transportation pipeline due to instability and damage of the water ring, based on the self-developed design of small indoor loop simulation experimental device, taking four kinds of ordinary heavy oil in Luda oilfield as the research object, the change law of restart-up pressure drop with time was experimentally studied when the pipeline was restarted-up after shutdown at constant water flow. The effects of oil holdup, oil viscosity, shutdown time as well as constant water flow velocity on the restart-up pressure drop were discussed. The regression analysis on the results of orthogonal restart-up experiment was conducted by IBM SPSS software, and a multivariate nonlinear regression model of restart-up pressure drop was established, the prediction reliability of which was verified through 192 groups of experimental data. The experimental results showed that the variations of restart-up pressure drop with time can be divided into two stages: attenuation stage and equilibrium stage. The restart-up pressure drop was positively correlated with oil holdup, oil viscosity, shutdown time and constant water flow velocity, but the influences of oil holdup and constant water flow velocity were the most significant. The predicted values of restart-up pressure drop were in good coincidence with the measured ones, and the relative error are within the range of ±10%.

Key words: heavy oil, water annulus, orthogonal experiment, restart-up pressure drop, regression model

中图分类号:

TE866

尹晓云, 付林浩, 李佳忆, 程思杰, 敬加强, MASTOBAEV Boris N, 孙杰. 稠油水环输送管道再启动压降特性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(11): 5669-5679.

YIN Xiaoyun, FU Linhao, LI Jiayi, CHENG Sijie, JING Jiaqiang, MASTOBAEV Boris N, SUN Jie. Analysis of restart-up pressure drop characteristics of heavy oil-water ring transportation pipeline[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(11): 5669-5679.

图/表 13

参考文献 32

1	王帅, 敬加强, 宋学华, 等. 稠油乳状液屈服特性及环道启动压力预测[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(9): 4020-4028.
	WANG Shuai, JING Jiaqiang, SONG Xuehua, et al. Yield characteristics of heavy oil emulsion and prediction for pipeline start-up pressure[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(9): 4020-4028.
2	DOS SANTOS L A, RIBEIRO D D, ROMERO O J. Heavy oil transportation through steam heating: An analytical and numerical approach[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 195: 107932.
3	ZAMAN M, BJORNDALEN N, ISLAM M R. Detection of precipitation in pipelines[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology, 2004, 22(9/10): 1119-1141.
4	柯文奇, 赵仁保, 石在虹, 等. 稠油掺稀降黏评价新方法及模拟分析[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 47(6): 1990-1994.
	KE Wenqi, ZHAO Renbao, SHI Zaihong, et al. A new viscosity evaluation method of heavy oil production assisted with light oil blending and simulation analysis[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2016, 47(6): 1990-1994.
5	ASHRAFIZADEH S N, KAMRAN M. Emulsification of heavy crude oil in water for pipeline transportation[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2010, 71(3/4): 205-211.
6	BAO Z Y, MILLIGAN S N, OLECHNOWICZ M, et al. Drag reduction of asphaltenic crude oils: US8450251[P]. 2013-05-28.
7	GHOSH S, MANDAL T K, DAS G, et al. Review of oil water core annular flow[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13(8): 1957-1965.
8	LI J J, CHEN X D, TANG X D, et al. Upgrading heavy and extra-heavy crude oil for transportation by use an iron oil-soluble catalyst[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology, 2017, 35(12): 1203-1208.
9	AL-MUNTASER A A, VARFOLOMEEV M A, SUWAID M A, et al. Effect of decalin as hydrogen-donor for in-situ upgrading of heavy crude oil in presence of nickel-based catalyst[J]. Fuel, 2022, 313: 122652.
10	MARTÍNEZ-PALOU R, DE LOURDES M M, ZAPATA-RENDÓN B, et al. Transportation of heavy and extra-heavy crude oil by pipeline: A review[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2011, 75(3/4): 274-282.
11	HART A. A review of technologies for transporting heavy crude oil and bitumen via pipelines[J]. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2014, 4(3): 327-336.
12	BENSAKHRIA A, PEYSSON Y, ANTONINI G. Experimental study of the pipeline lubrication of heavy oil transport[J]. Oil & Gas Science and Technology, 2004, 59(5): 523-533.
13	蒋文明, 杜仕林, 刘杨, 等. 新型稠油水环发生器维稳特性与结构优化研究[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 45(8): 86-90.
	JIANG Wenming, DU Shilin, LIU Yang, et al. Study on stability characteristics and structural optimization of a new type of core-annular flow generator with high viscosity oil[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 2018, 45(8): 86-90.
14	蒋文明, 杜仕林, 吴君强, 等. 稠油水环发生器结构优化[J]. 油气储运, 2019, 38(8): 937-943.
	JIANG Wenming, DU Shilin, WU Junqiang, et al. Structural optimization of core-annular flow generator for the heavy oil transportation[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2019, 38(8): 937-943.
15	BANNWART A C. Modeling aspects of oil-water core-annular flows[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2001, 32(2/3/4): 127-143.
16	OOMS G, VUIK C, POESIO P. Core-annular flow through a horizontal pipe: hydrodynamic counterbalancing of buoyancy force on core[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2007, 19(9): 092103.
17	OOMS G, POURQUIE M J B M, BEERENS J C. On the levitation force in horizontal core-annular flow with a large viscosity ratio and small density ratio[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2013, 25(3): 032102.
18	敬加强, 尹晓云, MASTOBAEV B N, 等. 水平管内水环输送模拟稠油减阻特性[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(2): 635-641.
	JING Jiaqiang, YIN Xiaoyun, MASTOBAEV B N, et al. Drag reduction characteristics of water annulus transportation of simulated heavy oil in horizontal pipeline[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(2): 635-641.
19	STRAZZA D, GRASSI B, DEMORI M, et al. Core-annular flow in horizontal and slightly inclined pipes: Existence, pressure drops, and hold-up[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66(12): 2853-2863.
20	INGEN H E, OOMS G, HENKES R A, et al. A comparison between numerical predictions and experimental results for horizontal core-annular flow with a turbulent annulus[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2017, 95(16): 271-282.
21	SHI J, AL-AWADI H, YEUNG H. An experimental investigation of high-viscosity oil-water flow in a horizontal pipe[J]. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2017, 95(12): 2423-2434.
22	HU H H, JOSEPH D D. Lubricated pipelining: Stability of core-annular flow. Part 2[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1989, 205(5): 359-396.
23	CHEN K P, BAI R Y, JOSEPH D D. Lubricated pipelining. Stability of core-annular flow in vertical pipes[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1990, 214: 251-286.
24	BANNWART A C. Bubble analogy and stabilization of core-annular flow[J]. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 2001, 123(2): 127-132.
25	RODRIGUEZ O M, BANNWART A C. Stability analysis of core-annular flow and neutral stability wave number[J]. AIChE Journal, 2008, 54(1): 20-31.
26	PEYSSON Y, BENSAKHRIA A, ANTONINI G, et al. Pipeline lubrication of heavy oil: experimental investigation of flow and restart problems[J]. SPE Production & Operations, 2007, 22(1): 135-140.
27	BANNWART A C, SANTOS C A C, FERREIRA V C. Modeling and simulation of a horizontal water-assisted heavy oil flow during a re-start operation[C]// Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Multiphase Flow in Industrial Plant, Palermo, Italy, 2008: 56-64.
28	JING J Q, YIN X Y, MASTOBAEV B N, et al. Experimental study on highly viscous oil-water annular flow in a horizontal pipe with 90° elbow[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2021, 135: 103499.
29	尹晓云, 敬加强, 孙杰, 等. 水平管内黏稠油水环输送管道停输再启动特性[J]. 石油机械, 2022, 50(3): 124-129.
	YIN Xiaoyun, JING Jiaqiang, SUN Jie, et al. Shutdown and restart characteristics on water ring transfer of heavy oil in horizontal pipeline[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2022, 50(3): 124-129.
30	POESIO P, STRAZZA D. Experiments on start-up of an oil-water core annular flow through a horizontal or nearly horizontal pipe[C]//Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Multiphase Production Technology, Edinburgh, UK, 2007: 79-87.
31	LIVINUS A, YEUNG H, LAO L Y. Restart time correlation for core annular flow in pipeline lubrication of high-viscous oil[J]. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2017, 7(1): 293-302.
32	STRAZZA D, POESIO P. Experimental study on the restart of core-annular flow[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2012, 90(11): 1711-1718.

名称	型号	主要参数	生产厂家
高温渣油泵	ZYB-83.3	流量5m³/h，吸程5m，电机功率2.2kW	泊头市衡科高温油泵厂
立式不锈钢多级离心泵	CVL4-16	额定流量4m³/h，额定扬程134m，功率3kW	广东凌霄泵业股份有限公司
涡轮流量计	LWGY-830	量程1~10m³/h，精度等级0.5级	天津七星华控自动化仪表有限公司
电磁流量计	LDC-QX315	量程0.5~7.0m³/h，精度等级0.5级	天津七星华控自动化仪表有限公司
活塞式空气压缩机	V-0.60/8型	转速860r/min，排气量0.60m³/min，排气压力0.8MPa	上海捷豹压缩机制造有限公司
差压变送器	CYQ-3051DP	量程0~50kPa，精度0.1%	天津七星华控自动化仪表有限公司
温度变送器	CWQ-316	量程0~100℃，精度0.25%	天津七星华控自动化仪表有限公司
千眼狼高速相机	2F04C	全幅分辨率2320×1720，采样曝光时间1~800s	合肥君达高科信息技术有限公司

名称	型号	主要参数	生产厂家
高温渣油泵	ZYB-83.3	流量5m³/h，吸程5m，电机功率2.2kW	泊头市衡科高温油泵厂
立式不锈钢多级离心泵	CVL4-16	额定流量4m³/h，额定扬程134m，功率3kW	广东凌霄泵业股份有限公司
涡轮流量计	LWGY-830	量程1~10m³/h，精度等级0.5级	天津七星华控自动化仪表有限公司
电磁流量计	LDC-QX315	量程0.5~7.0m³/h，精度等级0.5级	天津七星华控自动化仪表有限公司
活塞式空气压缩机	V-0.60/8型	转速860r/min，排气量0.60m³/min，排气压力0.8MPa	上海捷豹压缩机制造有限公司
差压变送器	CYQ-3051DP	量程0~50kPa，精度0.1%	天津七星华控自动化仪表有限公司
温度变送器	CWQ-316	量程0~100℃，精度0.25%	天津七星华控自动化仪表有限公司
千眼狼高速相机	2F04C	全幅分辨率2320×1720，采样曝光时间1~800s	合肥君达高科信息技术有限公司

水平	持油率	油品黏度/Pa·s	停输时间/h	恒定水流速度/m·s^-1
1	0.26	1.0553	0.5	0.25
2	0.35	2.038	1	0.53
3	0.45	2.55	—	0.72
4	0.55	3.02	—	1.01
5	0.66	—	—	—
6	0.76	—	—	—

水平	持油率	油品黏度/Pa·s	停输时间/h	恒定水流速度/m·s^-1
1	0.26	1.0553	0.5	0.25
2	0.35	2.038	1	0.53
3	0.45	2.55	—	0.72
4	0.55	3.02	—	1.01
5	0.66	—	—	—
6	0.76	—	—	—

序列	持油率	油品黏度/Pa·s	停输时间/h	恒定水流速度/m·s^-1	再启动压降/Pa
1	3	2	2	1	3412.57
2	2	1	1	3	3216.23
3	1	4	2	4	3417.56
4	1	2	1	3	1781.75
5	4	1	1	4	10934.14
6	2	1	2	2	2884.65
7	1	1	2	4	1345.32
8	5	4	1	2	14026.28
9	2	4	1	3	4687.44
10	2	3	2	4	6601.85
11	2	3	1	1	2214.60
12	1	3	2	2	2295.27
13	1	2	2	2	1963.57
14	4	3	1	2	9714.95
15	5	1	2	3	11024.30
16	2	2	2	4	5872.38
17	3	4	2	3	10335.63
18	5	3	2	1	8824.10
19	6	3	2	3	20378.42
20	3	3	1	4	11119.83
21	2	4	2	2	4688.74
22	5	2	1	4	18763.50
23	1	3	1	3	2103.36
24	2	2	1	1	2057.87
25	6	1	2	1	6125.19
26	6	2	1	2	15679.55
27	4	2	2	3	11096.20
28	1	1	1	1	789.53
29	4	4	2	1	6001.74
30	6	4	1	4	29984.57
31	3	1	1	2	4902.63
32	1	4	1	1	1198.49

稠油水环输送管道再启动压降特性分析

Analysis of restart-up pressure drop characteristics of heavy oil-water ring transportation pipeline

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈佳昆, 汤健, 夏恒, 乔俊飞. 城市固废炉排炉焚烧过程二𫫇英排放浓度数值仿真[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 1061-1072.
[2]	郑瑾, 韩瑞瑞, 李丹丹, 王馨妤, 高春阳, 杜显元, 张晓飞, 邹德勋. 过氧化尿素与微生物联合修复石油污染土壤[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(9): 5085-5093.
[3]	丁兴江, 章学来, 朱嘉豪, 毛发, 房满庭, 冯天平. 三水合乙酸钠复合相变材料过冷特性实验统计分析[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(11): 5946-5960.
[4]	王怿兴, 杨敬一, 胡春付, 徐心茹. SAGD稠油采出液高效分离中YM型破乳剂的合成及性能[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(1): 382-390.
[5]	王帅, 赵金柱, 王荣元, 崔凯翔, 敬加强. 乳化/润湿耦合作用稠油流动减阻新思路[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S2): 126-139.
[6]	冯阳阳, 赵众从, 杨文博, 胡琳琪, 张文达, 佘跃惠. 微生物合成金属纳米颗粒及在稠油催化降黏中的应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(4): 2215-2226.
[7]	敬加强, 尹晓云, NMASTOBAEV Boris, RVALEEV Anvar, 孙杰, 王思汗, 刘华平, 庄乐泉, 范峥嵘. 水平管内水环输送模拟稠油减阻特性[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(2): 635-641.
[8]	刘少斌, 齐宏, 余智强, 何明键, 于喜奎. 基于Taguchi方法的微小通道性能分析与参数优化[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(12): 6409-6422.
[9]	敬加强, 黄婉妮, 宋学华, 罗佳琪, 宋扬, 戢慧, 罗遒汉, 王思汗. 基于Fluent的井下油水分离和润滑过程中新型润滑元件设计分析[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(11): 5929-5938.
[10]	裴海华, 刘冬鑫, 张贵才, 单景玲, 蒋平. 塔河超稠油掺苯乙烯焦油降黏实验及黏度预测模型[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(S2): 135-141.
[11]	王帅,敬加强,宋学华,沈晓燕,陈璐. 稠油乳状液屈服特性及环道启动压力预测[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(9): 4020-4028.
[12]	郭睿, 高弯弯, 刘雪艳, 霍文生, 冯文佩, 李秀环. NPEAA与AEPH共改性苯基含氢硅油的制备及其破乳性能[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(06): 2922-2932.
[13]	李丽, 刘宝树, 郑学明, 孙华. 舒巴坦钠溶析结晶工艺优化[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(06): 2905-2914.
[14]	王治红, 丁晓明, 吴明鸥, 沈晓燕. 有机朗肯循环在多品位余热发电中的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(05): 2189-2196.
[15]	郭睿, 宋博, 郭煜, 李云鹏, 土瑞香, 王映月, 马兰. 木质素磺酸盐接枝共聚物的合成及工艺优化[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(05): 1962-1967.

参数	持油率	油品黏度/Pa·s	停输时间/h	恒定水流速度/m·s^-1
F值	26.853	3.393	3.237	10.046
Sig.值	0.000	0.039	0.088	0.000

参数	持油率	油品黏度/Pa·s	停输时间/h	恒定水流速度/m·s^-1
F值	26.853	3.393	3.237	10.046
Sig.值	0.000	0.039	0.088	0.000