塔河超稠油掺苯乙烯焦油降黏实验及黏度预测模型

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-0752

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对塔河油田12区超稠油的性质，进行了超稠油掺苯乙烯焦油降黏实验及黏度预测模型的研究。采用苯乙烯焦油和柴油对超稠油进行不同掺稀比的降黏实验，用非线性宾汉模型进行流变数据拟合，并将实验测得的混合油黏度与预测模型进行匹配。结果表明：超稠油掺混20%苯乙烯焦油的降黏效果与超稠油掺混10%柴油的降黏效果相同，降黏率大于97%，掺稀比越大、温度越高，混合油黏度越低。混合油的流变模型符合非线性宾汉模型，呈现出一定的剪切稀释性。当超稠油与苯乙烯焦油的黏度比低于1.76×10⁴时，混合油黏度可采用Cragoe修正模型和双对数修正模型Ⅱ进行计算，双对数修正模型Ⅱ对苯乙烯焦油与超稠油混合油的黏度预测效果最好，平均相对偏差为9.4%。

关键词: 超稠油, 掺稀降黏, 苯乙烯焦油, 流变性, 黏度预测模型

Abstract:

According to the properties of super heavy oil in block 12 of Tahe Oilfield, the experiment and viscosity prediction model of blending styrene tar to reduce super heavy oil viscosity were studied. In the case of different blending ratios, the experiments to reduce super heavy oil viscosity was carried by using styrene tar and diesel oil. The rheological data was fitted by the nonlinear Bingham model, and the viscosity data of blended oil measured by the experiment was matched with the prediction model. The results show that the visbreaking effect of 20% styrene tar blended with super heavy oil was the same as that of 10% diesel blended with super heavy oil, and the rate of viscosity reduction was greater than 97%. The higher the blending ratio and the temperature, the lower the viscosity of blended oil. The rheological model of blended oil conforms to the nonlinear Bingham model. The blended oil shows the shear thinning phenomenon. When the viscosity ratio of super heavy oil to styrene tar is less than 1.76×10⁴, the viscosity of blended oil can be calculated by Cragoe Modified model and Double Logarithmic Modified model Ⅱ. Double Logarithmic Modified model Ⅱ has the best viscosity prediction effect on blended oil of styrene tar and super heavy oil, which the mean relative deviation is 9.4%.

Key words: super heavy oil, blending light oil for viscosity reduction, styrene tar, rheological property, prediction model of viscosity

中图分类号:

TE345

裴海华, 刘冬鑫, 张贵才, 单景玲, 蒋平. 塔河超稠油掺苯乙烯焦油降黏实验及黏度预测模型[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(S2): 135-141.

Haihua PEI, Dongxin LIU, Guicai ZHANG, Jingling SHAN, Ping JIANG. Viscosity-reducing experiment and viscosity-predicting model of Tahe super heavy oil blended with styrene tar[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(S2): 135-141.

图/表 9

参考文献 12

12	ZHAN Shihui, WANG Yufei, FENG Xiao. Heat integration of columns in styrene plant[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2015, 34(6): 1564-1568.
13	曹萍, 单宝龙, 王雷, 等. 苯乙烯焦油对橡胶改性沥青性能的影响[J]. 精细石油化工, 2012, 29(2): 77-80.
	CAO Ping, SHAN Baolong, WANG Lei, et al. Research of styrene tar on properties of rubber modified asphalt[J]. Speciality Petrochemicals, 2012, 29(2): 77-80.
14	杨运泉, 段正康, 刘文英. 苯乙烯蒸馏残焦油中粗品苯乙烯的回收工艺[J]. 化工环保, 2001, 21(2): 101-104.
	YANG Yunquan, DUAN Zhengkang, LIU Wenying. Recovery of styrene in residue tar discharged from styrene distillation separation process[J]. Environmental Protection of Chemical Industry, 2001, 21(2): 101-104.
15	PFERFFER J P, SAAL R N J. Asphaltic bitumen as colloid system[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1940, 44(2): 139-149.
16	FRIGAARD Ian A, PASO Kristofer G, SOUZA Paulo R. Bingham’s model in the oil and gas industry[J]. Rheologica Acta, 2017, 56(3): 259-282.
17	李晓东, 张国萍, 刘明霞, 等. 高胶质稠油掺稀降黏技术[J]. 油田化学, 2015, 32(4): 584-587.
	LI Xiaodong, ZHANG Guoping, LIU Mingxia, et al. Viscosity reducing recovery technology of heavy oil by mixing light oil[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2015, 32(4): 584-587.
18	ALBOUDWAREJ Hussein, SHEFFIELD Jonathan M, HOANG Viet, et al. On the application of a simplified temperature-dependent friction-theory viscosity model in compositional and thermal-compositional reservoir simulations[C]// SPE Western Regional Meeting, San Jose, California, USA: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2019: 1-26.
19	KAMEL Abdulrahim, ALOMAIR Osamah, ELSHARKAWY Adel. Compositional based heavy oil viscosity model for Kuwaiti heavy crude oils[C]//SPE Heavy Oil Conference and Exhibition, Kuwait City, Kuwait: Society of Petroleum Engineers，2016：1-17.
20	LINDELOFF N, PEDERSEN K S, RONNINGSEN H P, et al. The corresponding states viscosity model applied to heavy oil systems[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology Petroleum, 2004, 43(9): 47-53.
21	郑云萍, 刘奇, 聂畅, 等. 神经网络构建稠油掺稀黏度预测模型研究[J]. 油田化学, 2014, 31(2): 231-235.
	ZHENG Yunping, LIU Qi, NIE Chang, et al. Research on the viscosity prediction model of viscous oil mixtures based on BP-neural network[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2014, 31(2): 231-235.
1	LI Yongqiang, HOU Jiagen, MA Xiaoqiang. Data integration in characterizing a fracture-cavity reservoir, Tahe oilfield, Tarim basin, China[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2016, 9(8): 1-12.
2	LEI Fuqiang, LIU Lian, LIU Li, et al. Productivity improvement using combination of static and dynamic underbalanced perforation in Tahe oilfield, basin Tarim, west China[C]//International Petroleum Technology Conference, Beijing, China: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2013: 1-7.
22	YARRANTON Harvey W, DORP Johan J, VERLAAN Marco L, et al. Wanted dead or live: crude-cocktail viscosity--a pseudocomponent method to predict the viscosity of dead oils, live oils, and mixtures[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2013, 52(3): 176-191.
23	LIU Yonghui, SHI Shuqiang, WANG Yongqing, et al. Calculation of heavy oil viscosity based on an Arrhenius model[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology, 2017, 35(12): 1196-1202.
24	DEGIORGIS G L, MATURANO S, GARAY M, et al. Oil mixture viscosity behavior: use in pipeline design[C]//SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Buenos Aires, Argentina: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2001：1-8.
25	SHU W R. A viscosity correlation for mixtures of heavy oil, bitumen, and petroleum fractions[J]. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 1984, 24(3): 277-282.
26	GUAN Jianguo, KARIZNOVI Mohammad, NOUROZIEH Hossein, et al. Density and viscosity for mixtures of athabasca bitumen and aromatic solvents[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2013, 58(3): 611-624.
27	NOUROZIEH Hossein, KARIZNOVI Mohammad, ANEDI Jalal. Viscosity measurement and modeling for mixtures of Athabasca bitumen/hexane[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2015, 129: 159-167.
28	WEN Y, KANTZAS A. Evaluation of heavy oil/bitumen-solvent mixture viscosity models[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2006, 45(4): 56-61.
29	刘名瑞, 王晓霖, 王海波, 等. 重质船用燃料油黏度预测模型研究[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2019, 50(3): 32-38.
	LIU Mingrui, WANG Xiaolin, WANG Haibo, et al. Viscosity prediction model for heavy marine fue oil[J]. Petroleum Processing and Petrochemicals, 2019, 50(3): 32-38.
30	明亮, 敬加强, 代科敏, 等. 塔河稠油掺稀黏度预测模型[J]. 油气储运, 2013, 32(3): 263-266.
	MING Liang, JING Jiaqiang, DAI Kemin, et al. Prediction model for viscosity of Tahe heavy oil mixed with light oil[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2013, 32(3): 263-266.
31	郑云萍, 李勋, 汪玉春, 等. 混合原油黏温数学模型研究进展[J]. 油气储运, 2010, 29(9): 683-686.
	ZHENG Yunping, LI Xun, WANG Yuchun, et al. Study progress in viscosity-temperature mathematical model of mixed crude oil[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2010, 29(9): 683-686.
32	张文轲, 孙东方. 稠稀油黏度比对混合油黏度预测准确性的影响[J]. 油气储运, 2015, 34(8): 829-833.
	ZHANG Wenke, SUN Dongfang. Effect of heavy-light oil viscosity ratio on prediction accuracy of mixed oil viscosity[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2015, 34(8): 829-833
33	赵文英, 李文文, 孙晓岩, 等. 基于PR立方型状态方程普遍化温度函数的研究与评价[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(3): 1234-1245.
	ZHAO Wenying, LI Wenwen, SUN Xiaoyan, et al. Research and evaluation on generalized alpha functions based on PR EoS[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(3): 1234-1245.
3	李业, 敬加强, 陈朝刚, 等. 塔河超深层中质油对稠油降黏的适应性[J]. 油气储运, 2012, 31(7): 504-506.
	LI Ye, JING Jiaqiang, CHEN Chaogang, et al. Adaptability of medium-density oil to the thinning of heavy oil[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2012, 31(7): 504-506.
4	裴海华, 张贵才, 葛际江, 等. 塔河油田超稠油混合掺稀降黏实验研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2011, 18(4): 111-113.
	PEI Haihua, ZHANG Guicai, GE Jijiang, et al. Experimental study of blending light oil to reduce super heavy oil viscosity in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2011, 18(4): 111-113.
5	SUN Nana, JIANG Huayi, WANG Yulong, et al. A comparative research of microwave, conventional-heating, and microwave/chemical demulsification of Tahe heavy-oil-in-water emulsion[J]. SPE Production & Operations, 2018, 33(2): 1-11.
6	NARRO Gerardo Martínez, VÁZQUEZ Cuauhtémoc Pozos, OFELIA Martha, et al. Viscosity reduction of heavy crude oil by dilution with hydrocarbons obtained via chemical recycling of plastic wastes[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology, 2019, 37(12): 1347-1354.
7	JING Jiaqiang, YIN Ran, ZHU Guojin, et al. Viscosity and contact angle prediction of low water-containing heavy crude oil diluted with light oil[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 176: 1121-1134.
8	ARININ Marianna, ZUEV Kirill, KULICHIKHIN Valery, et al. Superposition of temperature and diluent concentration for the viscosity reduction of heavy crude oil[J]. Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology, 2019, DOI: 10.1080/01932691.2019.1679167.
9	梅春明, 李柏林. 塔河油田掺稀降黏工艺[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2009, 37(1): 73-76.
	MEI Chunming, LI Bolin. Mixing light oil to reduce oil viscosity in Tahe oilfield[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2009, 37(1): 73-76.
10	林日亿, 李兆敏, 王景瑞, 等. 塔河油田超深井井筒掺稀降黏技术研究[J]. 石油学报, 2006, 27(3): 115-119.
	LIN Riyi, LI Zhaomin, WANG Jingrui, et al. Technology of blending diluting oil in ultra-deep wellbore of Tahe oilfield[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2006, 27(3): 115-119.
11	张建. 苯乙烯精馏阻聚剂性能分析及阻聚措施[J]. 化工进展, 2014, 33(S1): 312-316.
	ZHANG Jian. Performance analysis and anti-polymerization measures of polymerization inhibitor in styrene rectification[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2014, 33(S1): 312-316.
12	湛世辉, 王彧斐, 冯霄. 苯乙烯装置塔系热集成[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(6): 1564-1568.

类型	黏度/mPa·s
类型	50℃	60℃	70℃	80℃	90℃
苯乙烯焦油	22.7	18.3	13.6	11.7	10.9
超稠油	400000	224000	135000	64900	29200

类型	黏度/mPa·s
类型	50℃	60℃	70℃	80℃	90℃
苯乙烯焦油	22.7	18.3	13.6	11.7	10.9
超稠油	400000	224000	135000	64900	29200

掺稀比	降黏率/%
掺稀比	50℃	60℃	70℃	80℃	90℃
0.1	87.50	88.17	88.09	84.71	75.23
0.2	97.53	97.39	97.14	96.10	93.11
0.3	99.36	99.24	99.10	98.52	97.18
0.4	99.50	99.54	99.55	99.37	98.87
0.5	99.88	99.87	99.86	99.80	99.64
0.6	99.95	99.94	99.93	99.87	99.73

掺稀比	降黏率/%
掺稀比	50℃	60℃	70℃	80℃	90℃
0.1	87.50	88.17	88.09	84.71	75.23
0.2	97.53	97.39	97.14	96.10	93.11
0.3	99.36	99.24	99.10	98.52	97.18
0.4	99.50	99.54	99.55	99.37	98.87
0.5	99.88	99.87	99.86	99.80	99.64
0.6	99.95	99.94	99.93	99.87	99.73

掺稀比	降黏率/%
掺稀比	50℃	60℃	70℃	80℃	90℃
0.1	97.85	97.45	96.44	94.27	88.66
0.2	99.33	99.22	99.10	98.28	96.31
0.3	99.75	99.66	99.53	99.13	98.18
0.4	99.90	99.89	99.86	99.75	99.45
0.5	99.96	99.95	99.92	99.85	99.66
0.6	99.98	99.98	99.97	99.94	99.87