化工进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 5520-5530.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-2227
收稿日期:
2022-12-01
修回日期:
2023-02-13
出版日期:
2023-10-15
发布日期:
2023-11-11
通讯作者:
赵曜
作者简介:
李晶晶(1998—),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为城市固废资源化利用技术。E-mail:lijingjing_2021@163.com。
基金资助:
LI Jingjing(), ZHAO Yao(), XU Fengchi, LI Kangjian
Received:
2022-12-01
Revised:
2023-02-13
Online:
2023-10-15
Published:
2023-11-11
Contact:
ZHAO Yao
摘要:
为明确多孔炉渣沥青混合料作为透水沥青路面结构层材料使用期间发生重金属浸出而污染环境的可能性,本文基于前期研究所得三种粒径炉渣集料用于多孔沥青混合料的最佳方案,针对南京市气温与降雨特征设计了室内模拟实验,研究了不同温度与不同径流冲刷作用下,多孔炉渣沥青混合料中四种重金属(Pb、Zn、Cu和Cr)的浸出行为,重点探讨了径流冲刷作用对重金属浸出行为的影响机制。结果表明,受浸出时间和径流冲刷速率的影响,多孔炉渣沥青混合料中Pb的浸出水平最高,Cu和Cr次之,Zn最低(未检出)。四种重金属的浸出浓度受径流冲刷速率影响显著,Pb、Cr、Cu的浸出浓度均与径流速率呈显著正相关,冲刷速率越大,重金属浸出浓度越高。温度变化对Cu浸出浓度影响显著,浸出浓度随着温度升高而增加。此外,28d模拟实验中各重金属的浸出浓度均低于标准(GB 5084—2021)限值,且满足GB 3838—2002中Ⅲ类地表水质标准,说明南京市海绵城市建设中使用多孔炉渣沥青混合料环境安全性良好。
中图分类号:
李晶晶, 赵曜, 徐沣驰, 李康建. 不同径流冲刷作用下多孔炉渣沥青混合料重金属的浸出特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(10): 5520-5530.
LI Jingjing, ZHAO Yao, XU Fengchi, LI Kangjian. Heavy metal leaching characteristics of porous asphalt mixture containing MSWI-BAA under different stormwater runoff flow rates[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(10): 5520-5530.
方案 | 筛上(质量分数)/% | 最佳沥青用量/% | 纤维用量/% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.075~2.36mm | 2.36~4.75mm | 4.75~9.5mm | 9.5~13.2mm | 矿粉 | |||
N | 11.5 | 2.2 | 45.8 | 37 | 3.5 | 4.8 | 0.3 |
S | 8.05(3.45,30%) | 2.2 | 45.8 | 37 | 3.5 | 5.4 | |
M | 11.5 | 1.76(0.44,20%) | 45.8 | 37 | 3.5 | 5.1 | |
L | 11.5 | 2.2 | 32.06(13.74,30%) | 37 | 3.5 | 5.8 |
表1 本研究实验方案
方案 | 筛上(质量分数)/% | 最佳沥青用量/% | 纤维用量/% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.075~2.36mm | 2.36~4.75mm | 4.75~9.5mm | 9.5~13.2mm | 矿粉 | |||
N | 11.5 | 2.2 | 45.8 | 37 | 3.5 | 4.8 | 0.3 |
S | 8.05(3.45,30%) | 2.2 | 45.8 | 37 | 3.5 | 5.4 | |
M | 11.5 | 1.76(0.44,20%) | 45.8 | 37 | 3.5 | 5.1 | |
L | 11.5 | 2.2 | 32.06(13.74,30%) | 37 | 3.5 | 5.8 |
元素 | 质量分数/% | 元素 | 质量分数/% |
---|---|---|---|
Ca | 51.55 | K | 2.16 |
Si | 12.85 | Ti | 1.98 |
Al | 6.94 | Na | 1.59 |
Fe | 5.92 | Zn | 1.32 |
Cl | 4.78 | Cu | 0.22 |
S | 4.49 | Pb | 0.19 |
P | 2.66 | Cr | 0.17 |
Mg | 2.26 | Sr | 0.12 |
表2 生活垃圾焚烧炉渣元素组成[8]
元素 | 质量分数/% | 元素 | 质量分数/% |
---|---|---|---|
Ca | 51.55 | K | 2.16 |
Si | 12.85 | Ti | 1.98 |
Al | 6.94 | Na | 1.59 |
Fe | 5.92 | Zn | 1.32 |
Cl | 4.78 | Cu | 0.22 |
S | 4.49 | Pb | 0.19 |
P | 2.66 | Cr | 0.17 |
Mg | 2.26 | Sr | 0.12 |
方案 | N静 | N慢 | N快 | S静 | S慢 | S快 | M静 | M慢 | M快 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N静 | 1.000 | (0.989)① | (0.988)① | (0.988)① | (0.981)① | (0.986)① | (0.994)① | (0.989)① | (0.989)① |
N慢 | 0.895① | 1.000 | (0.995)① | (0.994)① | (0.991)① | (0.989)① | (0.995)① | (0.994)① | (0.992)① |
N快 | 0.913① | 0.966① | 1.000 | (0.992)① | (0.992)① | (0.989)① | (0.995)① | (0.997)① | (0.991)① |
S静 | 0.926① | 0.957① | 0.963① | 1.000 | (0.993)① | (0.993)① | (0.993)① | (0.995)① | (0.993)① |
S慢 | 0.932① | 0.936① | 0.970① | 0.961① | 1.000 | (0.987)① | (0.989)① | (0.991)① | (0.984)① |
S快 | 0.924① | 0.926① | 0.964① | 0.981① | 0.971① | 1.000 | (0.994)① | (0.993)① | (0.994)① |
M静 | 0.929① | 0.933① | 0.956① | 0.955① | 0.950① | 0.968① | 1.000 | (0.995)① | (0.995)① |
M慢 | 0.926① | 0.951① | 0.980① | 0.955① | 0.972① | 0.968① | 0.955① | 1.000 | (0.995)① |
M快 | 0.932① | 0.939① | 0.970① | 0.980① | 0.971① | 0.989① | 0.969① | 0.978① | 1.000 |
表3 Cu浸出浓度Pearson相关性分析结果
方案 | N静 | N慢 | N快 | S静 | S慢 | S快 | M静 | M慢 | M快 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N静 | 1.000 | (0.989)① | (0.988)① | (0.988)① | (0.981)① | (0.986)① | (0.994)① | (0.989)① | (0.989)① |
N慢 | 0.895① | 1.000 | (0.995)① | (0.994)① | (0.991)① | (0.989)① | (0.995)① | (0.994)① | (0.992)① |
N快 | 0.913① | 0.966① | 1.000 | (0.992)① | (0.992)① | (0.989)① | (0.995)① | (0.997)① | (0.991)① |
S静 | 0.926① | 0.957① | 0.963① | 1.000 | (0.993)① | (0.993)① | (0.993)① | (0.995)① | (0.993)① |
S慢 | 0.932① | 0.936① | 0.970① | 0.961① | 1.000 | (0.987)① | (0.989)① | (0.991)① | (0.984)① |
S快 | 0.924① | 0.926① | 0.964① | 0.981① | 0.971① | 1.000 | (0.994)① | (0.993)① | (0.994)① |
M静 | 0.929① | 0.933① | 0.956① | 0.955① | 0.950① | 0.968① | 1.000 | (0.995)① | (0.995)① |
M慢 | 0.926① | 0.951① | 0.980① | 0.955① | 0.972① | 0.968① | 0.955① | 1.000 | (0.995)① |
M快 | 0.932① | 0.939① | 0.970① | 0.980① | 0.971① | 0.989① | 0.969① | 0.978① | 1.000 |
重金属种类 | Pb-Cr(18℃) | Pb-Cu(18℃) | Cr-Cu(18℃) | Pb-Cr(30℃) | Pb-Cu(30℃) | Cr-Cu(30℃) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
相关性系数R2 | 0.790② | 0.618② | 0.847② | 0.590② | 0.880② | 0.596② |
0.806② | 0.820② | 0.847② | 0.671② | 0.875② | 0.616② | |
0.763② | 0.812② | 0.944② | 0.647② | 0.832② | 0.637② | |
0.717② | 0.816② | 0.835② | 0.648② | 0.865② | 0.569② | |
0.852② | 0.873② | 0.943② | 0.761② | 0.881② | 0.706② | |
0.775② | 0.776② | 0.835② | 0.671② | 0.919② | 0.558② | |
0.798② | 0.801② | 0.905② | 0.617② | 0.839② | 0.670② | |
0.876② | 0.811② | 0.956② | 0.321 | 0.801② | 0.316 | |
0.833② | 0.674② | 0.883② | 0.590② | 0.887② | 0.659② | |
0.843② | 0.650② | 0.822② | 0.257 | 0.908② | 0.345 | |
0.864② | 0.757② | 0.929② | 0.640② | 0.911② | 0.575② | |
0.915② | 0.777② | 0.866② | 0.311 | 0.927② | 0.434① |
表4 重金属两两间浸出浓度Pearson相关性分析结果
重金属种类 | Pb-Cr(18℃) | Pb-Cu(18℃) | Cr-Cu(18℃) | Pb-Cr(30℃) | Pb-Cu(30℃) | Cr-Cu(30℃) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
相关性系数R2 | 0.790② | 0.618② | 0.847② | 0.590② | 0.880② | 0.596② |
0.806② | 0.820② | 0.847② | 0.671② | 0.875② | 0.616② | |
0.763② | 0.812② | 0.944② | 0.647② | 0.832② | 0.637② | |
0.717② | 0.816② | 0.835② | 0.648② | 0.865② | 0.569② | |
0.852② | 0.873② | 0.943② | 0.761② | 0.881② | 0.706② | |
0.775② | 0.776② | 0.835② | 0.671② | 0.919② | 0.558② | |
0.798② | 0.801② | 0.905② | 0.617② | 0.839② | 0.670② | |
0.876② | 0.811② | 0.956② | 0.321 | 0.801② | 0.316 | |
0.833② | 0.674② | 0.883② | 0.590② | 0.887② | 0.659② | |
0.843② | 0.650② | 0.822② | 0.257 | 0.908② | 0.345 | |
0.864② | 0.757② | 0.929② | 0.640② | 0.911② | 0.575② | |
0.915② | 0.777② | 0.866② | 0.311 | 0.927② | 0.434① |
重金属种类 | Pb | Cr | Cu |
---|---|---|---|
相关性系数R2 | 0.668② | 0.517① | 0.933② |
0.665② | 0.676② | 0.960② | |
0.649② | 0.550② | 0.971② | |
0.784② | 0.729② | 0.982② | |
0.774② | 0.716② | 0.959② | |
0.674② | 0.501① | 0.977② | |
0.666② | 0.619② | 0.975② | |
0.759② | 0.703② | 0.973② | |
0.761② | 0.721② | 0.984② | |
0.719② | 0.678② | 0.804② | |
0.650② | 0.692② | 0.882② | |
0.718② | 0.805② | 0.986② |
表5 不同温度下各重金属浸出浓度Pearson相关性分析结果
重金属种类 | Pb | Cr | Cu |
---|---|---|---|
相关性系数R2 | 0.668② | 0.517① | 0.933② |
0.665② | 0.676② | 0.960② | |
0.649② | 0.550② | 0.971② | |
0.784② | 0.729② | 0.982② | |
0.774② | 0.716② | 0.959② | |
0.674② | 0.501① | 0.977② | |
0.666② | 0.619② | 0.975② | |
0.759② | 0.703② | 0.973② | |
0.761② | 0.721② | 0.984② | |
0.719② | 0.678② | 0.804② | |
0.650② | 0.692② | 0.882② | |
0.718② | 0.805② | 0.986② |
1 | 范宇杰, 陈萍, 马文欣, 等. 城市生活垃圾焚烧炉渣作为土木工程材料的资源化应用探讨[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2012, 37(6): 97-99. |
FAN Yujie, CHEN Ping, MA Wenxin, et al. Discussion on resource utilization of municipal solid waste incineration slag as civil engineering material[J]. Environment and Sustainable Development, 2012, 37(6): 97-99. | |
2 | 中华人民共和国国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2020. |
National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China. China statistical yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2020. | |
3 | LALITSUDA Phutthimethakul, NUTA Supakata. Partial replacement of municipal incinerated bottom ash and PET pellets as fine aggregate in cement mortars[J]. Polymers, 2022, 14(13): 2597. |
4 | LYNN C J, DHIR O R, GHATAORA G S. Municipal incinerated bottom ash characteristics and potential for use as aggregate in concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 127: 504-517. |
5 | 王书慧, 刘芳, 张翛, 等. 煤气化炉渣对沥青胶浆流变性能的影响研究[J]. 功能材料, 2022, 53(6): 6025-6034. |
WANG Shuhui, LIU Fang, ZHANG Xiao, et al. Study on the effect of coal gasification slag on the rheological properties of asphalt mastic[J]. Journal of Functional Materials, 2022, 53(6): 6025-6034. | |
6 | 王琳洁. 焚烧炉渣路用集料重金属浸出规律及数值模拟研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江工业大学, 2020. |
WANG Linjie. Study on leaching characteristics and numerical simulation of heavy metals in incineration bottom ash as subgrade[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University of Technology, 2020. | |
7 | 刘栋, 李立寒, 杨昆. 生活垃圾焚烧炉渣沥青混合料的耐久性能[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(1): 100-106. |
LIU Dong, LI Lihan, YANG Kun. Durability of asphalt mixture containing municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash aggregate[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2016, 44(1): 100-106. | |
8 | 朱亚婷. 透水炉渣沥青混合料的路用性能及环境安全性研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2019. |
ZHU Yating. Study on road performance and environmental safety of porous asphalt concrete with MSWI-BAA[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2019. | |
9 | ZHU Yating, ZHAO Yao, ZHAO Chen, et al. Physicochemical characterization and heavy metals leaching potential of municipal solid waste incinerated bottom ash (MSWI-BA) when utilized in road construction[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27(12): 14184-14197. |
10 | 中华人民共和国交通部. 公路工程集料试验规程: [S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2005. |
Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. Test methods of aggregate for highway engineering: [S]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2005. | |
11 | 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 透水沥青路面技术规程: [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012. |
Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Technical specification for permeable asphalt pavement: [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2012. | |
12 | 庄传仪, 王林, 申爱琴, 等. 沥青路面路表温度预估模型研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2010, 27(3): 39-43, 48. |
ZHUANG Chuanyi, WANG Lin, SHEN Aiqin, et al. Prediction model of surface temperature of asphalt pavement[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2010, 27(3): 39-43, 48. | |
13 | 刘栋, 李立寒. 生活垃圾焚烧炉渣集料的胶凝特征[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 45(3): 377-383. |
LIU Dong, LI Lihan. Cementitious properties of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash aggregate[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2017, 45(3): 377-383. | |
14 | ZHOU Jizhi, WU Simiao, PAN Yun, et al. Enrichment of heavy metals in fine particles of municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) fly ash and associated health risk[J]. Waste Management, 2015, 43: 239-246. |
15 | 彭位华, 桂和荣, 何文丽, 等. 粉煤灰和纤维陶粒重金属浸出特性研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2013, 13(3): 54-57. |
PENG Weihua, GUI Herong, HE Wenli, et al. Experimental study on leaching characteristics of heavy metals in fly ash and fiber ceramsite[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2013, 13(3): 54-57. | |
16 | 张晓萱, 席北斗, 王琪, 等. 垃圾焚烧飞灰熔融过程中重金属的固化机理以及熔渣浸出特性的研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2005, 27(5): 330-332, 315. |
ZHANG Xiaoxuan, XI Beidou, WANG Qi, et al. Solidification of heavy metals in municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) fly ash during melting process and leaching characteristic of its melting products[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 2005, 27(5): 330-332, 315. | |
17 | 胡明君, 李立寒, 王琎晨, 等. 炉渣沥青混合料路用性能与浸出特性试验研究[J]. 建筑材料学报, 2019, 22(3): 480-486. |
HU Mingjun, LI Lihan, WANG Jinchen, et al. Experimental study on pavement performance and leaching characteristic of asphalt mixture with bottom ash aggregate[J]. Journal of Building Materials, 2019, 22(3): 480-486. | |
18 | TASNEEM K M, NAM B H, EUN J, et al. Sustainable utilization of MSWI bottom ash as road construction materials, part Ⅱ: Chemical and environmental characterization[C]//Airfield and Highway Pavements, 2015, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2015: 593-604. |
19 | 朱亚婷, 赵曜, 赵尘. 水泥稳定炉渣碎石基层环境安全性的试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2018, 37(10): 3296-3302, 3316. |
ZHU Yating, ZHAO Yao, ZHAO Chen. Experimental study on environmental safety of cement stabilized MSWI-BA macadam base[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2018, 37(10): 3296-3302, 3316. | |
20 | BAYUSENO A P, SCHMAHL W W. Understanding the chemical and mineralogical properties of the inorganic portion of MSWI bottom ash[J]. Waste Management, 2010, 30(8/9): 1509-1520. |
21 | 陈子宏, 马国军, 肖海明, 等. 不锈钢冶炼电炉渣结构性质及浸出行为研究[J]. 武汉科技大学学报, 2009, 32(5): 466-470. |
CHEN Zihong, MA Guojun, XIAO Haiming, et al. Microstructural properties and leaching behavior of the stainless steel EAF slag[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 2009, 32(5): 466-470. | |
22 | 武美静. 西安市路面径流重金属及PAHs污染特征[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2016. |
WU Meijing. Study on the characteristics of heavy metal and PAHs of road runoff of Xi’an city[D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2016. | |
23 | 戴泽军, 王乐乐, 唐浩, 等. 废弃钒钛系选择性催化还原催化剂重金属浸出特性[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(10): 3873-3878. |
DAI Zejun, WANG Lele, TANG Hao, et al. Leaching characteristics of the heavy metals in spent vanadium and titanium SCR catalyst[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(10): 3873-3878. | |
24 | 徐斌, 何昌轩, 胡艳军, 等. 柱淋滤模式下生活垃圾焚烧炉渣中Cu2+和Zn2+浸出规律[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(S2): 406-412. |
XU Bin, HE Changxuan, HU Yanjun, et al. Column leaching of Cu2+ and Zn2+ from municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(S2): 406-412. | |
25 | 生态环境部, 国家市场监督管理总局. 农田灌溉水质标准: [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2021. |
Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. Standard for irrigation water quality: [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2021. | |
26 | 国家环境保护总局, 国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 地表水环境质量标准: [S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2002. |
State Environmental Protection Administration of the People’s Republic of China, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. Environmental quality standards for surface water: [S]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2002. |
[1] | 许春树, 姚庆达, 梁永贤, 周华龙. 共价有机框架材料功能化策略及其对Hg(Ⅱ)和Cr(Ⅵ)的吸附性能研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 461-478. |
[2] | 李世霖, 胡景泽, 王毅霖, 王庆吉, 邵磊. 电渗析分离提取高值组分的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 420-429. |
[3] | 李志远, 黄亚继, 赵佳琪, 于梦竹, 朱志成, 程好强, 时浩, 王圣. 污泥与聚氯乙烯共热解重金属特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4947-4956. |
[4] | 李卫华, 于倩雯, 尹俊权, 吴寅凯, 孙英杰, 王琰, 王华伟, 杨玉飞, 龙於洋, 黄启飞, 葛燕辰, 何依洋, 赵灵燕. 酸雨环境下填埋飞灰吨袋破损后重金属的溶出行为[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4917-4928. |
[5] | 张杉, 仲兆平, 杨宇轩, 杜浩然, 李骞. 磷酸盐改性高岭土对生活垃圾热解过程中重金属的富集[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3893-3903. |
[6] | 李若琳, 何少林, 苑宏英, 刘伯约, 纪冬丽, 宋阳, 刘博, 余绩庆, 徐英俊. 原位热解对油页岩物性及地下水水质影响探索[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3309-3318. |
[7] | 庄捷, 薛锦辉, 赵斌成, 张文艺. 猪粪厌氧消化进程中重金属与腐殖质的有机结合机制[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3281-3291. |
[8] | 郑昕, 贾里, 王彦霖, 张靖超, 陈世虎, 乔晓磊, 樊保国. 污泥与煤泥混烧对重金属固留特性的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3233-3241. |
[9] | 常占坤, 张弛, 苏冰琴, 张聪政, 王健, 权晓慧. H2S气态基质对污泥生物沥滤处理效能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2733-2743. |
[10] | 李卫华, 吴寅凯, 孙英杰, 尹俊权, 辛明学, 赵友杰. 垃圾焚烧飞灰重金属毒性浸出评价方法研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2666-2677. |
[11] | 郭宇晨, 刘庆林, 蒋金洋, 宗永忠, 王金伟, 李臻, 吕树祥. 含铬污泥资源化方法研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 575-584. |
[12] | 王玉, 余广炜, 林佳佳, 黎长江, 江汝清, 邢贞娇, 余铖. 沼渣、飞灰和污泥生物炭制备建筑陶粒[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 1039-1050. |
[13] | 唐朝春, 王顺藤, 黄从新, 冯文涛, 阮以宣, 史纯菁. 介孔金属有机框架材料吸附水中重金属离子研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(6): 3263-3278. |
[14] | 付杰, 邱春生, 王晨晨, 郑金鑫, 刘楠楠, 王栋, 王少坡, 孙力平. 污泥热水解处理过程重金属的迁移转化与风险评价[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(4): 2216-2225. |
[15] | 陈运涛, 董晓旭, 王洋, 王健男, 崔美, 黄仁亮. 巯基化Zr-MOFs/聚酯无纺布复合材料制备及应用[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(2): 854-861. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
京ICP备12046843号-2;京公网安备 11010102001994号 版权所有 © 《化工进展》编辑部 地址:北京市东城区青年湖南街13号 邮编:100011 电子信箱:hgjz@cip.com.cn 本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn |