界面聚合聚酰胺纳滤膜渗透选择性能优化的研究进展

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2019-2053

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

纳滤因其分离效率高、操作压力低、环境友好等优点，在废水处理、海水淡化和工业分离纯化等众多领域有着重要的应用。界面聚合法制备的聚酰胺（PA）纳滤膜是最为常用的纳滤膜种类之一。然而界面聚合反应速度快，如何通过调控界面聚合过程，优化纳滤膜选择分离层的结构从而提高渗透选择性，以满足不同领域对纳滤膜需求仍是亟需解决的问题。本文从影响界面聚合单体扩散因素的角度出发，综述了近年来PA纳滤膜渗透选择性能优化的研究进展，包括新型PA纳滤膜、纳米材料/PA混合基质膜及超薄PA纳滤膜3个方面，探讨了选择分离层结构调控与纳滤膜渗透选择性能优化的关系，最后指出目前界面聚合制备高渗透选择性PA纳滤膜在规模化、稳定性及可控性存在的问题，并对未来界面聚合纳滤膜在微观结构和聚合过程调控方面的研究进行了展望。

关键词: 纳滤膜, 界面聚合, 聚酰胺, 渗透性选择性

Abstract:

Nanofiltration (NF) technology has been widely applied in the fields of wastewater treatment, seawater desalination, as well as separation and purification in industry because of its high separation efficiency, low operating pressure, and environmental-friendly characters. Polyamide (PA) membranes prepared via interfacial polymerization (IP) are the most commonly used in nanofiltration. However, the reaction rate of IP process is too fast to control. Thus, it is still an urgent issue to effectively regulate the IP process to optimize the selective layer structures of nanofiltration membranes (NFM), which could further enhance the perm-selectivity of the NFM to meet the required performance from different applications. This paper summarized the progress in optimization of perm-selectivity performance of NFM including novel PA NFM, PA/nanomaterials mixed matrix membranes and ultrathin PA NFM from the viewpoint of controlling monomers diffusion during IP process. Then, the structure tuning methods on selective layers to improve the perm-selectivity performance of NFM was discussed. Furthermore, the challenges in large-scale preparation of PA-based NFM with good stability and controllability were pointed out. Finally, the perspectives on the promising methods for tuning microstructures and polymerization process of NFM were provided.

Key words: nanofiltration membrane, interfacial polymerization, polyamide, perm-selectivity

中图分类号:

秘一芳, 安全福. 界面聚合聚酰胺纳滤膜渗透选择性能优化的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(6): 2093-2104.

Yifang MI, Quanfu AN. Progress in optimization of polyamide nanofiltration membranes prepared by interfacial polymerization for perm-selectivity[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(6): 2093-2104.

参考文献

1	李原园,曹建廷,黄火键,等. 国际上水资源综合管理进展[J]. 水科学进展, 2018, 29(1): 127.
1	LI Yuanyuan, CAO Jianting, HUANG Huojian, et al. International progresses in integrated water resources management[J]. Progress in Water Science, 2018, 29(1): 127.
2	ELIMELECH M, PHILLIP W A. The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment[J]. Science, 2011, 333(6043): 712-717.
3	徐又一，徐志康. 高分子膜材料[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2005.
3	XU Y Y, XU Z K. Polymer membrane materials[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2005.
4	SHANNON M A, BOHN P W, ELIMELECH M, et al. Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades[J]. Nature, 2008, 452: 301-310.
5	ETIKSSON P. Nanofiltration extends the range of membrane filtration[J]. Environmental Progress, 1988, 7(1): 58-62.
6	王晓琳, 涂丛慧, 方彦彦, 等. 纳滤膜孔结构、荷电性质、分离机理及动电性质研究进展[J]. 膜科学与技术, 2011, 31: 127.
6	WANG Xiaolin, TU Conghui, FANG Yanyan, et al. The researches on the pore structure, charge property, seperation mechanism and electrokinetic phenomena of nanofiltration membranes[J]. Membrane Science and Technology, 2011, 31: 127.
7	OATLEY-RADCLIFFE D L, WALTER M, AINSCOUGH T J, et al. Nanofiltration membranes and processes: a review of research trends over the past decade[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2017, 19: 164-171.
8	MOHAMMAD A W, TEOW Y H, ANG W L, et al. Nanofiltration membranes review: recent advances and future prospects[J]. Desalination, 2015, 356: 226-254.
9	FREGER V. Kinetics of film formation by interfacial polycondensation[J]. Langmuir, 2005, 21(5): 1884-1894.
10	SONG Y, SUN P, HENRY L L, et al. Mechanisms of structure and performance controlled thin film composite membrane formation via interfacial polymerization process[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2005, 251(1/2): 67-79.
11	JIN J, LIU D, ZHANG D, et al. Preparation of thin-film composite nanofiltration membranes with improved antifouling property and flux using 2, 2′-oxybis-ethylamine[J]. Desalination, 2015, 355: 141-146.
12	WENG X D, JI Y L, MA R, et al. Superhydrophilic and antibacterial zwitterionic polyamide nanofiltration membranes for antibiotics separation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 510: 122-130.
13	MA T Y, SU Y, LI Y, et al. Fabrication of electro-neutral nanofiltration membranes at neutral pH with antifouling surface via interfacial polymerization from a novel zwitterionic amine monomer[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 503: 101-109.
14	CHENG X Q, LIU Y, GUO Z, et al. Nanofiltration membrane achieving dual resistance to fouling and chlorine for “green” separation of antibiotics[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 493: 156-166.
15	HU J, Lü Z, XU Y, et al. Fabrication of a high-flux sulfonated polyamide nanofiltration membrane: experimental and dissipative particle dynamics studies[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 505: 119-129.
16	ZENG Y, WANG L, ZHANG L, et al. An acid resistant nanofiltration membrane prepared from a precursor of poly (s-triazine-amine) by interfacial polymerization[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 546: 225-233.
17	TANG Y J, XU Z L, XUE S M, et al. A chlorine-tolerant nanofiltration membrane prepared by the mixed diamine monomers of PIP and BHTTM[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 498: 374-384.
18	ANG M B M Y, JI Y L, HUANG S H, et al. Incorporation of carboxylic monoamines into thin-film composite polyamide membranes to enhance nanofiltration performance[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 539: 52-64.
19	REZANIA J, VATANPOUR V, SHOCKRAVI A, et al. Preparation of novel carboxylated thin-film composite polyamide-polyester nanofiltration membranes with enhanced antifouling property and water flux[J]. Reactive and Functional Polymers, 2018, 131: 123-133.
20	ZHAO Y, ZHANG Z, DAI L, et al. Enhanced both water flux and salt rejection of reverse osmosis membrane through combining isophthaloyl dichloride with biphenyl tetraacyl chloride as organic phase monomer for seawater desalination[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 522: 175-182.
21	YUAN B, JIANG C, LI P, et al. Ultrathin polyamide membrane with decreased porosity designed for outstanding water-softening performance and superior antifouling properties[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2018, 10 (49): 43057-43067.
22	LI L, ZHANG S, ZHANG X. Preparation and characterization of poly(piperazineamide) composite nanofiltration membrane by interfacial polymerization of 3,3′,5,5′-biphenyl tetraacyl chloride and piperazine[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2009, 335 (1): 133-139.
23	ZHANG Z, KANG G D, YU H J, et al. From reverse osmosis to nanofiltration: precise control of the pore size and charge of polyamide membranes via interfacial polymerization[J]. Desalination, 2019, 46: 16-23.
24	QIAN H, ZHENG J, ZHANG S. Preparation of microporous polyamide networks for carbon dioxide capture and nanofiltration[J]. Polymer, 2013, 54(2): 557-564.
25	LI Y, SU Y, DONG Y, et al. Separation performance of thin-film composite nanofiltration membrane through interfacial polymerization using different amine monomers[J]. Desalination, 2014, 333(1): 59-65.
26	VERISSIMO S, PEINEMANN K V, BORDADO J. Influence of the diamine structure on the nanofiltration performance, surface morphology and surface charge of the composite polyamide membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 279(1/2): 266-275.
27	LIU Z, KUANG W, KANG G, et al. Preparation and characterization of a composite nanofiltration membrane interfacially polymerized from cis,cis-1,3,5‐triaminocyclohexane and trimesoyl chloride[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2016, 133(23): 43511.
28	LEE K P, BARGEMAN G, DE ROOIJ R, et al. Interfacial polymerization of cyanuric chloride and monomeric amines: pH resistant thin film composite polyamine nanofiltration membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 523: 487-496.
29	YU S, MA M, LIU J, et al. Study on polyamide thin-film composite nanofiltration membrane by interfacial polymerization of polyvinylamine (PVAm) and isophthaloyl chloride (IPC)[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, 379(1/2): 164-173.
30	LI L C, WANG B G, TAN H M, et al. A novel nanofiltration membrane prepared with PAMAM and TMC by in situ interfacial polymerization on PEK-C ultrafiltration membrane[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 269(1/2): 84-93.
31	CHENG X Q, SHAO L, LAU C H. High flux polyethylene glycol based nanofiltration membranes for water environmental remediation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 476: 95-104.
32	HAI Y, ZHANG J, SHI C, et al. Thin film composite nanofiltration membrane prepared by the interfacial polymerization of 1, 2, 4, 5-benzene tetracarbonyl chloride on the mixed amines cross-linked poly (ether imide) support[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 520: 19-28.
33	WANG T, YANG Y, ZHENG J, et al. A novel highly permeable positively charged nanofiltration membrane based on a nanoporous hyper-crosslinked polyamide barrier layer[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 448: 180-189.
34	GEISE G M, PARK H B, SAGLE A C, et al. Water permeability and water/salt selectivity tradeoff in polymers for desalination[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, 369(1/2): 130-138.
35	BANO S, MAHMOOD A, KIM S J, et al. Graphene oxide modified polyamide nanofiltration membrane with improved flux and antifouling properties[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015, 3(5): 2065-2071.
36	WEN P, CHEN Y, HU X, et al. Polyamide thin film composite nanofiltration membrane modified with acyl chlorided graphene oxide[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 535: 208-220.
37	ZHAO F Y, JI Y L, WENG X D, et al. High-flux positively charged nanocomposite nanofiltration membranes filled with poly(dopamine) modified multiwall carbon nanotubes[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 535: 208-220.
38	XUE S M, XU Z L, TANG Y J, et al. Polypiperazine-amide nanofiltration membrane modified by different functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs)[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8(29): 19135-19144.
39	HE Y, ZHAO D L, CHUNG T S. Na⁺ functionalized carbon quantum dot incorporated thin-film nanocomposite membranes for selenium and arsenic removal[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 564: 483-491.
40	SORRIBAS S, GORGOJO P, TELLZ C, et al. High flux thin film nanocomposite membranes based on metal-organic frameworks for organic solvent nanofiltration[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013, 135(40): 15201-15208.
41	ZHU J Y, HOU J W, YUAN S S, et al. MOF-positioned polyamide membranes with a fishnet-like structure for elevated nanofiltration performance[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2019, 7: 16313.
42	HE Y, TANG Y P, CHUNG T S. Concurrent removal of selenium and arsenic from water using polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS)-polyamide thin-film nanocomposite nanofiltration membranes[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2016, 55(50): 12929-12938.
43	WANG C, LI Z, CHEN J, et al. Covalent organic framework modified polyamide nanofiltration membrane with enhanced performance for desalination[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 523: 273-281.
44	JI Y L, AN Q F, GUO Y S, et al. Bio-inspired fabrication of high perm-selectivity and anti-fouling membranes based on zwitterionic polyelectrolyte nanoparticles[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2016, 4(11): 4224-4231.
45	KONG X, QIU Z L, LIN C E, et al. High permselectivity hyperbranched polyester/polyamide ultrathin films with nanoscale heterogeneity[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2017, 5(17): 7876-7884.
46	WU M, MA T, SU Y, et al. Fabrication of composite nanofiltration membrane by incorporating attapulgite nanorods during interfacial polymerization for high water flux and antifouling property[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 544: 79-87.
47	HU D, XU Z L, WEI Y M. A high performance silica-fluoropolyamide nanofiltration membrane prepared by interfacial polymerization[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2013, 110: 31-38.
48	NAMVAR-MAHBOUB M, PAKIZEH M. Development of a novel thin film composite membrane by interfacial polymerization on polyetherimide/modified SiO₂ support for organic solvent nanofiltration[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2013, 119: 35-45.
49	DONG L, HUANG X, WANG Z, et al. A thin-film nanocomposite nanofiltration membrane prepared on a support with in situ embedded zeolite nanoparticles[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2016, 166: 230-239.
50	ORMANCI-ACAR T, CELEBIB F, KEKIN B, et al. Fabrication and characterization of temperature and pH resistant thin film nanocomposite membranes embedded with halloysite nanotubes for dye rejection[J]. Desalination, 2018, 429: 20-32.
51	LI H B, SHI W Y, ZHANG Y F, et al. Improved performance of poly(piperazine amide) composite nanofiltration membranes by adding aluminum hydroxide nanospheres[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2016, 166： 240-251.
52	WANG L, DUAN S, FANG M, et al. Surface modification route to prepare novel polyamide@ NH₂ -MIL-88B nanocomposite membranes for water treatment[J]. RSC Advances, 2016, 6(75): 71250-71261.
53	ZHU J Y, QIN L, ULIANA A, et al. Elevated performance of thin film nanocomposite membranes enabled by modified hydrophilic MOFs for nanofiltration[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(2): 1975-1986.
54	WANG J, WANG Y M, ZHANG Y, et al. Zeolitic imidazolate framework/graphene oxide hybrid nanosheets functionalized thin film nanocomposite membrane for enhanced antimicrobial performance[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8(38): 25508-25519.
55	MA H, BURGER C, HSIAO B S, et al. Highly permeable polymer membranes containing directed channels for water purification[J]. ACS Macro Letters, 2012, 1(6): 723-726.
56	KARAN S, JIANG Z, LIVINGSTON A G. Sub-10 nm polyamide nanofilms with ultrafast solvent transport for molecular separation[J]. Science, 2015, 348(6241): 1347-1351.
57	ZHU Y, XIE W, GAO S, et al. Single-walled carbon nanotube film supported nanofiltration membrane with a nearly 10nm thick polyamide selective layer for high-flux and high‐rejection desalination[J]. Small, 2016, 12(36): 5034-5041.
58	WANG Z, WANG Z, LIN S, et al. Nanoparticle-templated nanofiltration membranes for ultrahigh performance desalination[J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 2004.
59	WU D, HUANG Y, YU S, et al. Thin film composite nanofiltration membranes assembled layer-by-layer via interfacial polymerization from polyethylenimine and trimesoyl chloride[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 472: 141-153.
60	SHAN L, GU J, FAN H, et al. Microphase diffusion-controlled interfacial polymerization for an ultrahigh permeability nanofiltration membrane[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(51): 44820-44827.

[1]	叶海星, 陈宇昊, 陈仪, 孙海翔, 牛青山. 镁锂分离复合纳滤膜研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1934-1943.
[2]	赵珍珍, 郑喜, 王雪琪, 王涛, 冯英楠, 任永胜, 赵之平. 聚酰胺复合膜微孔支撑基底的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1917-1933.
[3]	杨凯璐, 陈明星, 王新亚, 张威, 肖长发. 染料废水处理用纳滤膜制备及改性研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(10): 5470-5486.
[4]	方龙龙, 郑文姬, 宁梦佳, 张明扬, 杨雨晴, 代岩, 贺高红. 功能化Zr-MOF强化混合基质膜CO₂分离[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(9): 4954-4962.
[5]	张赛晖, 李校阳, 高慧, 王丽丽. 制备聚酰胺复合膜中界面聚合反应添加剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(9): 4884-4894.
[6]	宋英琪, 沈一丁, 刘勇兵, 党园园. 低有机氯含量PAE基纸张湿强剂的制备及性能评价[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(10): 5558-5566.
[7]	李泽辉, 崔恒, 王军. 氯化聚氯乙烯复合纳滤膜的制备及其在模拟RB5染料废水处理中的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S1): 456-465.
[8]	李志录, 王敏, 赵有璟, 彭正军, 白露. 膜特征对锂资源提取过程的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(9): 5061-5072.
[9]	刘娟, 陈宇昊, 叶海星, 孙海翔. 界面聚合在渗透汽化膜分离领域的应用进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(8): 4314-4326.
[10]	刘祎, 汪明旺, 吕宏凌, 陈金庆. 共价有机骨架聚合物功能膜制备方法的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(8): 4360-4370.
[11]	陈宇昊, 刘家辉, 刘娟, 章洪斌, 孙海翔. 新型复合纳滤膜研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(5): 2665-2675.
[12]	汤依莲, 李士洋, 孙志娟, 高从堦, 薛立新. 具有三维聚酰胺脱盐网络结构的无纺布复合正渗透膜[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(12): 5170-5181.
[13]	邰茉, 胡盼, 王靖涛. 微通道内流体流动对聚酰胺微胶囊壁面褶皱的影响分析及应用[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(08): 3067-3075.
[14]	赵海洋, 张林. 聚酰胺反渗透膜的分子动力学模拟研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(12): 4319-4328.
[15]	范益群, 漆虹. 陶瓷纳滤膜制备与应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(06): 1786-1793.