有机胺基氨基酸盐混合吸收剂对沼气中CO2的分离特性

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2015.03.041

化工进展 ›› 2015, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 857-862.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2015.03.041

有机胺基氨基酸盐混合吸收剂对沼气中CO₂的分离特性

贺清尧, 蔡凯, 晏水平, 艾平, 王媛媛, 张衍林

华中农业大学工学院, 湖北武汉 430070

收稿日期:2014-08-10 修回日期:2014-08-29 出版日期:2015-03-05 发布日期:2015-03-05
通讯作者: 晏水平,博士,副教授,主要从事生物天然气制备、沼气高质化利用及CO₂控制与减排方面研究。E-mail:yanshp@mail.hzau.edu.cn。
作者简介:贺清尧(1990-),男,博士研究生,主要研究沼气高质化利用技术。E-mail:qingyao_he@webmail.hzau.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51376078,51006044)

Performance of CO₂ removal from biogas by using amine-based amino acid salts blended absorbents

HE Qingyao, CAI Kai, YAN Shuiping, AI Ping, WANG Yuanyuan, ZHANG Yanlin

College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China

Received:2014-08-10 Revised:2014-08-29 Online:2015-03-05 Published:2015-03-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在鼓泡式CO₂吸收和再生装置中, 研究了N-甲基二乙醇胺(MDEA)/乙醇胺(MEA)、MDEA/乙醇胺基甘氨酸(MEAGLY)和MDEA/乙醇胺基肌氨酸(MEASAR)混合吸收剂的沼气CO₂吸收及再生特性。结果表明:混合吸收剂的沼气CO₂吸收速率随MEA、MEAGLY和MEASAR等添加剂添加量的增加而提高, 但再生速率却呈现下降趋势。再生过程中, 吸收剂在升温阶段均发生了CO₂再生, 且混合吸收剂再生效果要优于单一吸收剂。综合考虑CO₂吸收速率、再生速率和CO₂循环携带量, MDEA与活化剂质量配比为3:2时所组成的混合吸收剂的沼气CO₂吸收-再生综合性能最优。沼气CO₂分离成本对比分析显示, 与质量分数为30%的MEA相比, 总质量分数为30%的MDEA/MEAGLY(3:2)和MDEA/MEA(3:2)的CO₂分离成本可分别下降约12%和30%, 在未来具有替代MEA进行工程应用的潜能。

关键词: 沼气提纯, 有机胺基氨基酸盐, 混合吸收剂, 吸收, 二氧化碳再生

Abstract: This paper investigated the CO₂ absorption performance from biogas and regeneration characteristics using N-methyldiethanolamine-based(MDEA)blended solvents respectively promoted by monoethanolamine(MEA), MEA-based glycinate(MEAGLY) and MEA-based sarcosinate(MEASAR)in a bubbling CO₂ absorption/regeneration reactor. Results showed that the CO₂ absorption rates of blended solvents increased with the adding amount of promoters, but CO₂ desorption rates decreased. During the period of temperature increase from the absorption range to regeneration range, all the CO₂-rich solvents were regenerated, and the blended solvents performed better than the single solvents in CO₂ regeneration efficiency. In addition, when mass ratio of MDEA to promoter was 3:2 in the blended solvents, the absorption-regeneration performances were optimal. CO₂ removal costs from biogas of different absorbents were also assessed and compared. Compared to the single MEA with 30% mass fraction, the blended solvents, MDEA/MEAGLY and MDEA/MEA in which the total mass fraction was 30% and the ratio of MDEA to MEAGLY or MEA was 3:2 had the lower CO₂ removal costs by about 12% and 30%, respectively. So MDEA/MEAGLY and MDEA/MEA might be the promising alternatives to replace MEA in the future.

Key words: biogas upgrading, amine based amino acid salt, blended solvent, absorption, CO₂ regeneration

中图分类号:

S216.4

贺清尧, 蔡凯, 晏水平, 艾平, 王媛媛, 张衍林. 有机胺基氨基酸盐混合吸收剂对沼气中CO₂的分离特性[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(3): 857-862.

HE Qingyao, CAI Kai, YAN Shuiping, AI Ping, WANG Yuanyuan, ZHANG Yanlin. Performance of CO₂ removal from biogas by using amine-based amino acid salts blended absorbents[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progree, 2015, 34(3): 857-862.

参考文献

[1] Nicolas A, Steve B.A review of biogas purification processes[J].Biofuels, Bioprod.Bioref., 2009, 3:42-71.

[2] Basu S, Khan A L, Cano O A, et al.Membrane-based technologies for biogas separations[J].Chemical Society Reviews, 2010, 39(2):750-768.

[3] 程序, 梁近光, 郑恒受, 等.中国"产业沼气"的开发及应用前景[J].农业工程学报, 2010, 26(5):1-6.

[4] Ryckebosch E, Drouillon M, Vervaeren H.Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane[J].Biomass and Bioenergy, 2011, 35(5):1633-1645.

[5] de Hullu J, Massdden J W, Shazad S, et al.Comparing different biogas upgrading techniques[R].Netherlands:Eindhoven University of Technology, 2008.

[6] 晏水平, 陈竞翱, 艾平, 等.利用膜吸收技术分离沼气中CO₂[J].农业工程学报, 2012(11):196-204.

[7] Rochelle G T.Amine scrubbing for CO₂ capture[J].Science, 2009, 325:1652-1654.

[8] Huang B, Xu S S, Cao S W.Industrial test and techno-economic analysis of CO₂ capture in Huaneng Beijing coal-fired power station[J].Applied Energy, 2010, 87(11):3347-3354.

[9] 晏水平, 陈竞翱, 艾平, 等.低成本CO₂化学吸收法分离技术的研究进展[J].现代化工, 2012, 32(10):25-28.

[10] 晏水平, 陈竞翱, 徐明亮, 等.自然型氨基酸及其钾盐的CO₂吸收和再生特性[J].环境科学, 2012, 33(6):1971-1978.

[11] Ugochukwu E A, Hartono A, Hallvard F S.Density, viscosity, and N2O solubility of aqueous amino acid salt and amine amino acid salt solutions[J].The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 2012, 45:90-99.

[12] 晏水平, 贺清尧, 蔡凯, 等.有机胺基氨基酸盐吸收剂的沼气CO₂分离特性[J].农业机械学报, 2014, 45(6):199-205.

[13] 李亚萍, 赵玉君, 呼延念超, 等.MDEA/DEA 脱硫脱碳混合溶液在长庆气区的应用[J].天然气工业, 2009, 29(10):107-110.

[14] 郑修新, 张晓云, 余青霓, 等.CO₂吸收材料的研究进展[J].化工进展, 2012, 31(2):360-366.

[15] Penttilä A, Dell'era C, Uusi-kyyny P, et al.The henry's law constant of N2O and CO₂ in aqueous binary and ternary amine solutions (MEA, DEA, DIPA, MDEA, and AMP)[J].Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2011, 311:59-66.

[16] Raphael I, Malcolm W, Paitoon T, et al.Pilot plant studies of the CO₂ capture performance of aqueous MEA and mixed MEA/MDEA solvents at the university of regina CO₂ capture technology development plant and the boundary DAM CO₂ capture demonstration plant[J].Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2006, 45:2414-2420.

[17] Aronu U E, Svendsen H F, Hoff K A.Investigation of amine amino acid salts for carbon dioxide absorption[J].International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2010, 4(5):771-775.

[18] Ugochukwu E A, Ardihartono, Svendsen H.Kinetics of carbon dioxide absorption into aqueous amine amino acid salt:3(methylamino)-propylamine/sarcosine solution[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66:6109-6119.

[19] 晏水平, 陈竞翱, 贺清尧, 等.氨基酸盐吸收剂的沼气CO₂吸收特性[J].同济大学学报:自然科学版, 2012, 40(2):127-133.

[20] 王金莲, 方梦祥, 晏水平, 等.吸收CO₂新型混合化学吸收剂的研究[J].环境科学, 2007, 28(44):2630-2636.

[21] Abu-zahra M R M, Niederer J P M, Feron P H M.CO₂ capture from power plants.Part II.A parametric study of the economical performance based on monoethanolamine[J].International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2007, 1(2):135-142.

有机胺基氨基酸盐混合吸收剂对沼气中CO₂的分离特性

Performance of CO₂ removal from biogas by using amine-based amino acid salts blended absorbents

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张凤岐, 崔成东, 鲍学伟, 朱炜玄, 董宏光. 胺液吸收-分步解吸脱硫工艺的设计与评价[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 518-528.
[2]	李季桐, 王刚, 熊亚选, 徐钱. 不同工质单效吸收式制冷系统的能量和㶲分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 104-112.
[3]	杨寒月, 孔令真, 陈家庆, 孙欢, 宋家恺, 王思诚, 孔标. 微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器脱碳性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 197-204.
[4]	吕超, 张习文, 金理健, 杨林军. 新型两相吸收剂-离子液体系统高效捕获CO₂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3226-3232.
[5]	符乐, 杨阳, 徐文青, 耿錾卜, 朱廷钰, 郝润龙. 新型相变有机胺吸收捕集CO₂技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 2068-2080.
[6]	桑伟, 唐建峰, 花亦怀, 陈洁, 孙培源, 许义飞. 物理溶剂及有机胺的性质对相变吸收性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 2151-2159.
[7]	王秋华, 吴嘉帅, 张卫风. 碱性工业固废矿化封存二氧化碳研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1572-1582.
[8]	叶好, 胡平, 王策, 刘勇. 磁性纤维电磁波吸收剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(10): 5310-5321.
[9]	秦振芳, 廖日红, 马伟芳. 吸收-微藻法固定燃气电厂低浓度CO₂同步产油技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(1): 94-106.
[10]	陆诗建, 刘苗苗, 刘玲, 康国俊, 毛松柏, 王风, 张娟娟, 贡玉萍. 烟气胺法CO₂捕集技术进展与未来发展趋势[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(1): 435-444.
[11]	张卫风, 周武, 王秋华. 相变吸收捕集烟气中CO₂技术的发展现状[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(4): 2090-2101.
[12]	冯燕, 李娜, 杜南, 李小倩, 周屈兰. 基于NaOH溶液CO₂膜吸收系统的膜结构及传质性能[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(3): 1283-1288.
[13]	唐思扬, 李星宇, 鲁厚芳, 钟山, 梁斌. 低能耗化学吸收碳捕集技术展望[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(3): 1102-1106.
[14]	李红, 吉轲, 齐天勤机, 李晓静, 万慧慧, 张永春, 陈绍云. 复配醇胺溶液对CO₂的吸收解吸性能及其降解性能[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(2): 1025-1035.
[15]	齐振华, 周蓉, 白亚楠, 李玉芹, 唐裕芳. 小球藻流加补料强化处理发酵废水联产高质蛋白饲料[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(12): 6733-6743.