热泵精馏在三氯氢硅提纯过程中的模拟

化工进展

热泵精馏在三氯氢硅提纯过程中的模拟

黄国强，赵虎勇，孙帅帅

天津大学化工学院，天津 300072

出版日期:2013-06-05 发布日期:2013-06-05

Simulation of heat pump distillation in trichlorosilane purification process

HUANG Guoqiang，ZHAO Huyong，SUN Shuaishuai

School of Chemical Engineering and Technology，Tianjin University，Tianjin 300072，China

Online:2013-06-05 Published:2013-06-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 运用化工模拟软件Aspen Plus，选用NRTL-RK物性模型和RADFRAC精馏模型，对三氯氢硅精馏塔的两种热泵流程进行了模拟计算，分别是塔顶气体直接压缩式和塔釜液体闪蒸再沸式热泵精馏。对比热泵精馏流程和常规精馏流程，结果表明：对三氯氢硅提纯而言，塔釜液体闪蒸再沸式热泵流程更有利。本研究采用双塔串行流程提纯三氯氢硅，运用塔釜液体闪蒸再沸式热泵精馏技术，优化后的主要操作参数为：T1塔回流比20，节流阀压力180 kPa，压缩机出口压力309 kPa；T2塔回流比5，节流阀压力227 kPa，压缩机出口压力310 kPa。优化后三氯氢硅的一次收率为88.75%，纯度超过99.9999%；在处理量相同情况下，与常规精馏相比，能耗费用节约82%。

关键词: 三氯氢硅, 热泵精馏, 节能, Aspen Plus

Abstract: Two types of heat pump distillation flow for trichlorosilane purification were simulated by chemical simulation software Aspen Plus with NRTL-RK property and RADFRAC distillation models. One model used the vapor from the top as heat pump medium and the other model used the liquid from the bottom as heat pump medium. The comparison of heat pump distillation and conventional distillation processes showed that the latter had more advantages in trichlorosilane purification. Two-column trichlorosilane refining serial process using the liquid from the bottom as heat pump medium was conducted. The main optimum operation parameters were showed below. T1 column：outlet pressure of compressor was 309 kPa，mole reflux ratio was 20 and throttle valve pressure was 180 kPa；T2 column：outlet pressure of compressor was 310 kPa，mole reflux ratio was 5 and throttle valve pressure was 227 kPa. The yield coefficient of trichlorosilane was 88.75% and its purity was more than 99.9999%. Compared with conventional distillation，energy cost saving was about 82% at the same handling capacity.

Key words: trichlorosilane, heat pump distillation, energy saving, Aspen Plus

黄国强，赵虎勇，孙帅帅. 热泵精馏在三氯氢硅提纯过程中的模拟[J]. 化工进展.

HUANG Guoqiang，ZHAO Huyong，SUN Shuaishuai. Simulation of heat pump distillation in trichlorosilane purification process[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progree.

[1]	张瑞杰, 刘志林, 王俊文, 张玮, 韩德求, 李婷, 邹雄. 水冷式复叠制冷系统的在线动态模拟与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 124-132.
[2]	徐玉珍, 蒋达华, 刘景滔, 陈璞. 粉煤灰基相变储能材料的制备及性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2595-2605.
[3]	汪东, 于品华, 陈斌, 肖昂, 陈锋, 江洋洋. 环己酮生产中的环己烷三效精馏节能优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2245-2251.
[4]	陆诗建, 刘苗苗, 刘玲, 康国俊, 毛松柏, 王风, 张娟娟, 贡玉萍. 烟气胺法CO₂捕集技术进展与未来发展趋势[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(1): 435-444.
[5]	马有福, 王梓文, 吕俊复. 热风再循环机炉耦合高效发电系统变负荷性能仿真及优化[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(5): 2340-2347.
[6]	张陆, 杨声. 低温甲醇洗碳捕集改进与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(11): 6167-6175.
[7]	孙志伟, 伍联营, 胡仰栋, 张伟涛. 可再生能源在化工生产及其公用工程系统中的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(10): 5297-5305.
[8]	黄洋, 张稼骏, 李家腾, 夏铭, 许春建. 费托合成水相副产物混合醇分离：馏分切割工艺设计及控制[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(10): 5200-5213.
[9]	舒钊, 钟珂, 肖鑫, 贾洪伟, 吕凤勇, 常沙. 多孔纳米基复合相变材料在建筑节能中的应用进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S2): 265-278.
[10]	付朝乾, 王墩金, 孟令富. 蒸汽压缩技术应用于再沸器的节能减碳分析[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S2): 20-24.
[11]	车景华, 王子健. 热泵精馏在柴油加氢装置与干气提浓装置热联合上的应用分析[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S1): 27-31.
[12]	郑志行, 张家元, 李谦, 周浩宇. 气流床煤气化的Aspen Plus建模：平衡模型和动力学模型[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(8): 4165-4172.
[13]	郑志行, 李谦, 张家元, 周浩宇. 基于Aspen Plus的Shell气流床工业气化炉模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(4): 2152-2160.
[14]	陈延贵, 张纹齐, 王银峰, 廖传华, 朱跃钊. 基于Aspen Plus的煤-炼化污泥高温气化特性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(10): 5786-5793.
[15]	邵缨迪, 胡建杭, 刘慧利, 蔡正达. 异丁烯提纯装置换热网络的能效分析[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(S2): 57-65.