污泥与固废基燃料协同焚烧过程结渣特性

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2024-2062

化工进展 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (12): 7308-7318.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2024-2062

• 资源与环境化工 • 上一篇

污泥与固废基燃料协同焚烧过程结渣特性

曾鸿飞¹(), 焦龙¹, 王旭¹^,², 郭倩倩¹^,³, 邓凯¹^,⁴, 胡艳军¹^,³()

^1.浙江工业大学能源与碳中和科教融合学院，浙江杭州 310014
^2.福建博厚建设工程有限公司，福建福州 350070
^3.浙江省清洁能源转化与利用重点实验室，浙江杭州 310014
^4.福建省祥睿建设集团有限公司，福建厦门 361022

收稿日期:2024-12-19 修回日期:2025-04-15 出版日期:2025-12-25 发布日期:2026-01-06
通讯作者: 胡艳军
作者简介:曾鸿飞（2000—），男，硕士研究生，研究方向为有机固废热解气化过程污染物控制技术。E-mail：zhf13030530902@163.com。
基金资助:
浙江省自然科学基金重点项目(LZ23E060004);国家自然科学基金面上项目(52170141)

Slagging characteristics of co-firing process of sludge and solid waste as basic fuels

ZENG Hongfei¹(), JIAO Long¹, WANG Xu¹^,², GUO Qianqian¹^,³, DENG Kai¹^,⁴, HU Yanjun¹^,³()

^1.School of Energy and Carbon Neutrality Integration, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, Zhejiang, China
^2.Fujian Bohou Construction Engineering Co. , Ltd. , Fuzhou 350070, Fujian, China
^3.Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Conversion and Utilization, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310014, Zhejiang, China
^4.Fujian Xiangrui Construction Group Co. , Ltd. , Xiamen 361022, Fujian, China

Received:2024-12-19 Revised:2025-04-15 Online:2025-12-25 Published:2026-01-06
Contact: HU Yanjun

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近年来，污泥与高热值工业有机固废被广泛作为回收燃料应用于焚烧发电，提升能源回收与固废处置的协同效益。本研究深入分析了这两大类固废掺烧的结渣特性，选取4种典型工业固废与市政污泥作为研究对象，同时以燃煤作为辅助燃料，主要研究了掺烧后灰渣的微观结构特征、矿物相生成特性、结渣特征指数以及大型焚烧现场固废替代煤和污泥掺烧后灰渣结渣情况。结果表明，不同固废与煤的加入对污泥结渣有显著影响，与污泥单独焚烧相比，掺煤燃烧后的灰分黏附程度降低，颗粒间团聚作用减弱，相反秸秆、塑料与橡胶添加后灰渣团聚现象加重；掺混橡胶、塑料及纺织品焚烧后的灰渣中出现(Ca,Mg)₃(PO₄)₄（磷酸钙镁）高熔点晶体。另外，结渣特征指数分析表明，加入煤可提高灰渣中酸性氧化物占比，煤中的钙元素促进高熔点的硫酸钙形成，加入木屑与丁腈橡胶对于结渣情况有所缓解，尤其碱酸比和硫结渣指数显著降低。大型污泥焚烧现场掺烧实验采集灰渣样品的结渣分析结果表明：提高固体回收燃料掺烧比与延长稳定燃烧时间有助于降低结渣风险。以上研究结果为进一步优化污泥焚烧处置工艺、提高资源利用效率提供了科学依据，具有重要的实际应用价值。

关键词: 污泥, 固体废物, 协同焚烧, 结渣特性

Abstract:

In recent years, sewage sludge and high-calorific-value industrial organic solid wastes have been widely utilized as recovered fuels for co-incineration in power generation, enhancing the synergistic benefits of energy recovery and solid waste disposal. This study conducted an in-depth analysis of the slagging characteristics associated with the co-combustion of these two major types of solid waste. Four representative types of industrial solid waste and municipal sludge were selected as research subjects, with coal used as an auxiliary fuel. The investigation primarily focused on the microstructural features of the resulting ash, mineral phase formations, slagging characteristic indices, and the slagging behavior observed in ash samples from large-scale incineration plants co-firing sludge and industrial waste as substitutes for coal. The results indicated that the addition of different solid wastes and coal significantly influenced the slagging behavior of sludge. Compared to the combustion of sludge alone, co-firing with coal reduced ash adhesion and weakened particle agglomeration. In contrast, the addition of straw, plastics, and rubber intensified ash agglomeration. High-melting-point crystals of (Ca,Mg)₃(PO₄)₄ (calcium magnesium phosphate) were identified in the ash residues from co-incineration with rubber, plastic, and textiles. Furthermore, analysis of slagging characteristic indices revealed that the addition of coal increased the proportion of acidic oxides in the ash. Calcium in coal promoted the formation of high-melting-point calcium sulfate. The inclusion of wood chips and nitrile rubber alleviated slagging, with a notable reduction in both the base-to-acid ratio and sulfur slagging index. Slagging analysis of ash samples collected from large-scale sludge incineration tests showed that increasing the proportion of solid recovered fuel and extending stable combustion duration helped to reduce slagging risks. These findings provide a scientific basis for further optimization of sludge incineration processes and enhancement of resource utilization efficiency, offering significant practical value.

Key words: sludge, solid waste, co-firing, slagging characteristics

中图分类号:

TK16

曾鸿飞, 焦龙, 王旭, 郭倩倩, 邓凯, 胡艳军. 污泥与固废基燃料协同焚烧过程结渣特性[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(12): 7308-7318.

ZENG Hongfei, JIAO Long, WANG Xu, GUO Qianqian, DENG Kai, HU Yanjun. Slagging characteristics of co-firing process of sludge and solid waste as basic fuels[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2025, 44(12): 7308-7318.

图/表 9

表1 原料的工业分析（干燥基，质量分数）

原料	水分/%	灰分/%	挥发分/%	固定碳/%	热值/kJ·kg^-1
污泥	2.38	55.80	41.70	0.12	5674.6
SRF	2.15	11.22	80.82	5.81	18900.7
煤	9.40	27.30	41.8	21.50	21285.4
聚丙烯（PP）	0.03	0.06	99.9	0.01	45655.21
聚苯乙烯（PS）	0.06	0.03	99.55	0.36	40902.54
布料	1.03	0.67	87.01	11.29	22052.33
草编边角料	12.8	0.6	77.65	8.95	19096.25
丁腈橡胶	2.02	23.86	67.19	6.93	21499.41
丁苯橡胶	0.07	0	99.48	0.45	41641.93
木屑	7.84	8.63	69.16	14.37	21621.43
秸秆	7.25	5.46	67.93	19.36	14490.15

表2 原料的元素分析（干燥基，质量分数）

原料	C/%	H/%	O/%	N/%	S/%
污泥	21.92	2.98	13.75	1.38	1.80
SRF	54.33	6.47	23.57	0.72	1.54
煤	56.70	3.40	7.30	1.00	0.70
聚丙烯	84.7	13.90	1.4	—	—
聚苯乙烯	90.58	7.76	1.5	—	0.16
布料	61.41	4.27	33.8	0.04	0.48
草编边角料	48.76	6.05	44.44	0.34	0.41
丁腈橡胶	80.47	8.78	1.15	8.76	0.84
丁苯橡胶	89.3	9.54	0.93	—	0.23
木屑	55.1	7.3	36.6	0.9	0.2
秸秆	42.33	5.78	33.07	1.06	0.31

表3 结渣特征指数及计算公式

结渣指数	公式
B/A	$B / A = F e 2 O 3 + C a O + M g O + K 2 O + N a 2 O A l 2 O 3 + S i O 2 + T i O 2 × 100 %$
S_R	$S R = S i O 2 S i O 2 + F e 2 O 3 + C a O + M g O × 100 %$
R_S	$R S = F e 2 O 3 + C a O + M g O + K 2 O + N a 2 O A l 2 O 3 + S i O 2 + T i O 2 × S d$
B/A×Na₂O	$B / A × N a 2 O = F e 2 O 3 + C a O + M g O + K 2 O + N a 2 O A l 2 O 3 + S i O 2 + T i O 2 × N a 2 O$
总碱	Na₂O+K₂O
总氯	Cl
硫氯比	S/Cl

表3 结渣特征指数及计算公式

结渣指数	公式
B/A	$B / A = F e 2 O 3 + C a O + M g O + K 2 O + N a 2 O A l 2 O 3 + S i O 2 + T i O 2 × 100 %$
S_R	$S R = S i O 2 S i O 2 + F e 2 O 3 + C a O + M g O × 100 %$
R_S	$R S = F e 2 O 3 + C a O + M g O + K 2 O + N a 2 O A l 2 O 3 + S i O 2 + T i O 2 × S d$
B/A×Na₂O	$B / A × N a 2 O = F e 2 O 3 + C a O + M g O + K 2 O + N a 2 O A l 2 O 3 + S i O 2 + T i O 2 × N a 2 O$
总碱	Na₂O+K₂O
总氯	Cl
硫氯比	S/Cl

图1 污泥与不同固废组分掺烧灰渣表观样貌SEM图

图2 污泥与不同固废组分焚烧灰的矿物相组分XRD图1—CaSO4；2—Fe2O3；3—SiO2；4—CaAl2Si2O8；5—(Ca,Mg)3(PO4)4

表4 污泥与固废组分焚烧结渣特征指数

样品	B/A	S_R	R_S	B/A×Na₂O	总碱	S/Cl	Cl
污泥	2.69	16.97	10.14	4.39	1.63	2.01	0.37
污泥＋煤	2.07	21.63	7.84	3.33	2.02	8.27	0.45
污泥＋聚丙烯	2.29	20.06	7.68	3.34	1.81	26.58	0.12
污泥+聚苯乙烯	2.21	21.06	7.47	3.19	1.84	16.85	2.21
污泥＋布料（含海绵）	2.57	18.16	8.97	3.35	2.06	14.08	0.24
污泥＋草编边角料	2.28	20.75	7.52	3.52	1.92	14.58	2.27
污泥＋丁腈橡胶	2.22	21.68	6.60	3.53	1.95	11.29	2.22
污泥＋丁苯橡胶	2.39	19.37	9.08	3.25	1.70	17.43	0.21
污泥＋秸秆	2.24	20.53	5.35	3.65	2.06	4.07	2.24
污泥＋木屑	2.22	20.19	5.25	3.53	1.97	7.15	2.22

表5 以污泥组为基准各组结渣指数增减幅度及腐蚀性评估

样品	R_S	S_R	B/A		B/A×Na₂O	S/Cl		Cl
颜色标注	0~10%	>10%~20%	>20%~30%	>30%~40%	>40%	轻度腐蚀	中度腐蚀	重度腐蚀
污泥＋煤	-22.77%	27.55%	-23.05%		-24.18%	8.27		0.45
污泥＋秸秆	-47.24%	20.33%	-16.73%		-0.90%	4.07		2.24
污泥＋木屑	-48.56%	18.87%	-17.48%		-2.39%	7.15		2.22
污泥＋丁腈橡胶	-34.28%	27.56%	-17.48%		-1.13%	11.29		2.22
污泥+聚苯乙烯	-26.37%	24.07%	-18.06%		-5.73%	16.85		2.21
污泥＋草编边角料	-25.48%	22.20%	-15.23%		-1.13%	14.58		2.27
污泥＋聚丙烯	-24.13%	18.74%	-14.85%		-23.73%	26.58		0.12
污泥＋丁苯橡胶	-10.47%	14.91%	-11.15%		-6.37%	17.43		0.21
污泥＋布料（含海绵）	-11.64%	7.03%	-4.46%		-2.39%	14.08		0.24

表6 不同SRF替煤燃烧工况下化学成分

成分	质量分数/%
成分	Fe₂O₃	SiO₂	CaO	Al₂O₃	SO₃	P₂O₅	MgO	Na₂O	K₂O	其他
SRF10%灰渣-1	28.41	19.82	19.31	13.81	8.9	3.86	1.47	1.78	0.43	2.205
SRF10%灰渣-2	26.72	20.57	18.98	14.64	8.85	4.07	1.46	1.99	0.50	2.216
SRF26.5%灰渣-1	25.42	20.42	21.65	13.72	9.09	4.04	1.43	1.48	0.51	2.236
SRF26.5%灰渣-2	24.82	21.25	20.62	14.89	8.52	4.09	1.44	1.59	0.59	2.189
SRF30%灰渣-1	25.97	19.2	20.82	14.57	9.98	3.69	1.31	1.76	0.52	2.177
SRF30%灰渣-2	24.51	22.85	20.29	14.2	8.16	4.05	1.49	1.61	0.60	2.238
未掺烧灰渣-1	33.11	16.02	18.8	13.46	8.65	3.56	1.55	2.21	0.33	2.308
未掺烧灰渣-2	33.24	15.91	18.85	13.27	8.86	3.54	1.56	2.15	0.32	2.298

图3 SRF替煤灰渣结渣特征指数计算结果

参考文献 28

[1]	HE S, CHEN K, ZHANG Y, et al. The coincineration of sewage sludge and municipal solid waste in an industrial scale incineration power plant[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2023, 20(3): 2919-2928.
[2]	Monika KOSOWSKA-GOLACHOWSKA, LUCKOS Adam, Agnieszka KIJO-KLECZKOWSKA, et al. Gaseous emissions during oxy-fuel combustion of sewage sludge in a circulating fluidized bed[J]. Powder Technology, 2020, 371: 209-216.
[3]	LIN Wei, LIU Xiao, DING An, et al. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs)-based sludge conditioning for enhanced sludge dewatering and micropollutants removal: A critical review[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2022, 45: 102468.
[4]	MURAKAMI Takahiro, SUZUKI Yoshizo, NAGASAWA Hidekazu, et al. Combustion characteristics of sewage sludge in an incineration plant for energy recovery[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2009, 90(6): 778-783.
[5]	SU Kun, OUYANG Ziqu, WANG Hongshuai, et al. Experimental study on municipal sludge/coal co-combustion preheated by self-preheating burner: Self-preheating two-stage combustion and NO _x emission characteristics[J]. Energy, 2024, 290: 130222.
[6]	杨郭昊, 张本农, 胡艳军. 有机固废燃烧过程中细颗粒物表面环境持久性自由基生成的研究进展[J]. 能源环境保护, 2023, 37(3): 118-127.
	YANG Guohao, ZHANG Bennong, HU Yanjun. Research progress on the generation of environmental persistent free radicals on the surface of fine particulates during the combustion of organic solid waste[J]. Energy Environmental Protection, 2023, 37(3): 118-127.
[7]	LIN Yan, LIAO Yanfen, YU Zhaosheng, et al. The investigation of co-combustion of sewage sludge and oil shale using thermogravimetric analysis[J]. Thermochimica Acta, 2017, 653: 71-78.
[8]	袁世震, 郭倩倩, 卢如飞, 等. 活性炭喷射吸附在烟气净化中应用的数值模拟分析[J]. 能源环境保护, 2023, 37(6): 89-100.
	YUAN Shizhen, GUO Qianqian, LU Rufei, et al. Numerical simulation analysis of activated carbon injection adsorption in flue gas purification application[J]. Energy Environmental Protection, 2023, 37(6): 89-100.
[9]	LIAO Yanfen, MA Xiaoqian. Thermogravimetric analysis of the co-combustion of coal and paper mill sludge[J]. Applied Energy, 2010, 87(11): 3526-3532.
[10]	WANG Teng, LIU Bo, XUE Yongjie, et al. Effect of textile waste on incineration behavior of dyeing sludge: Combustion characteristics, gas emissions, kinetics[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 435: 140619.
[11]	PENG Xiaowei, MA Xiaoqian, XU Zhibin. Thermogravimetric analysis of co-combustion between microalgae and textile dyeing sludge[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 180: 288-295.
[12]	DING Ziyi, CHEN Zihong, LIU Jingyong, et al. Co-combustion, life-cycle circularity, and artificial intelligence-based multi-objective optimization of two plastics and textile dyeing sludge[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 426: 128069.
[13]	LIU Hu, WANG Yancheng, XUE Jingwen, et al. Experimental study on combustion, ash fusibility and slagging propensity during co-combustion of organic solid waste and lignite[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2023, 106: 101145.
[14]	WANG Teng, CAI Chengjian, XUE Yongjie, et al. Regulation of ash slagging behavior for sewage sludge by rice husk addition: Focusing on control mechanisms[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 284: 124677.
[15]	修浩然, 王云刚, 白彦渊, 等. 准东煤/市政污泥掺烧燃烧特性及灰熔融行为分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3242-3252.
	XIU Haoran, WANG Yungang, BAI Yanyuan, et al. Combustion characteristics and ash fusion behavior of co-combustion of Zhundong coal and municipal sludge[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(6): 3242-3252.
[16]	ZHANG Xiaoyong, CHEN Xiaoping, XIAO Jun, et al. Comparative study of different sewage sludge incineration treatments based on environmental and economic life cycle assessment[J]. Waste Management & Research, 2024, 42(5): 418-429.
[17]	ZHAO Jing, LI Bo, WEI Xiaolin, et al. Slagging characteristics caused by alkali and alkaline earth metals during municipal solid waste and sewage sludge co-incineration[J]. Energy, 2020, 202: 117773.
[18]	LI Mingqiang, ZHANG Zhongxiao, WU Xiaojiang, et al. Experiment and mechanism study on the effect of kaolin on melting characteristics of Zhundong coal ash[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2016, 30(9): 7763-7769.
[19]	孙保民, 高满达, 苏逸峰, 等. 城市污泥对五彩湾高钠煤灰熔融特性的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(8): 2991-3000.
	SUN Baomin, GAO Manda, SU Yifeng, et al. Influence of sewage sludge on ash-melting characteristics during combustion of high sodium coal of Wucai Wan[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(8): 2991-3000.
[20]	WANG Ruikun, ZHAO Zhenghui, QIU Lichun, et al. Experimental investigation of synergistic behaviors of lignite and wasted activated sludge during their co-combustion[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2017, 156: 271-279.
[21]	ZHAI Ming, LI Xuesong, YANG Di, et al. Ash fusion characteristics of biomass pellets during combustion[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 336: 130361.
[22]	YAO Xiwen, ZHAO Zhicheng, LI Jishuo, et al. Experimental investigation of physicochemical and slagging characteristics of inorganic constituents in ash residues from gasification of different herbaceous biomass[J]. Energy, 2020, 198: 117367.
[23]	YAO Xiwen, ZHOU Haodong, XU Kaili, et al. Systematic study on ash transformation behaviour and thermal kinetic characteristics during co-firing of biomass with high ratios of bituminous coal[J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 147: 1453-1468.
[24]	GRIMM Alejandro, SKOGLUND Nils, Dan BOSTRÖM, et al. Bed agglomeration characteristics in fluidized quartz bed combustion of phosphorus-rich biomass fuels[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2011, 25(3): 937-947.
[25]	YU Yunpeng, YU Zhiao, XU Wei, et al. High-temperature ash melting and fluidity behavior upon the co-combustion of sewage sludge and coal[J]. ACS Omega, 2024, 9(12): 14455-14464.
[26]	DAI Baiqian, WU Xiaojiang, DE GIROLAMO Anthony, et al. Inhibition of lignite ash slagging and fouling upon the use of a silica-based additive in an industrial pulverised coal-fired boiler. Part 1. Changes on the properties of ash deposits along the furnace[J]. Fuel, 2015, 139: 720-732.
[27]	LACHMAN Jakub, Marek BALÁŠ, Martin LISÝ, et al. An overview of slagging and fouling indicators and their applicability to biomass fuels[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2021, 217: 106804.
[28]	ROBERTS Lee J, MASON Patrick E, JONES Jenny M, et al. The impact of aluminosilicate-based additives upon the sintering and melting behaviour of biomass ash[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2019, 127: 105284.

污泥与固废基燃料协同焚烧过程结渣特性

Slagging characteristics of co-firing process of sludge and solid waste as basic fuels

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	史佩鑫, 谢靖, 刁荣俊, 何蓉, 谢丽. 水解酸化工艺用于新污染物治理研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(S1): 451-461.
[2]	冯志华, 朱柏宾, 刘希忠, 董小庆, 王涛, 颜宇辰, 袁凡, 刘怡然, 陈滢. 信号分子对低温膨胀污泥中微生物的调控作用[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(S1): 559-566.
[3]	杨诗妮, 许玉东. 垃圾渗滤液纳滤浓缩液闭环处理副产石膏制备石膏晶须[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(9): 5450-5459.
[4]	张光辉, 江金旭, 黄磊, 陈士祥, 马天添. 市政污泥富氧燃烧特性影响因素分析及预测[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(9): 5460-5470.
[5]	高君, 孙晓杰, 董滨. 不同氮源基质厌氧消化过程中氮转化及微生态的差异揭示污泥蛋白类物质的降解瓶颈[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(7): 4190-4201.
[6]	任鹏锟, 仲兆平, 张小霓, 杨宇轩, 冉真真. 污泥-木屑基活性炭的制备及其对苯系VOCs的吸附性能[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(6): 3031-3040.
[7]	赵佳琪, 黄亚继, 李志远, 朱志成, 祁帅杰, 高嘉炜, 刘俊, 张煜尧. 污泥同农林废弃物共热解重金属迁移转化特性[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(2): 1064-1075.
[8]	江鹏, 刘树根, 田森林, 宁平. 污水厂污泥生物干化特性及水分去除机制[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(2): 1110-1119.
[9]	董姗燕, 黄世发, 何佛平, 罗进财, 王欣芸, 朱易春. CER处理对剩余污泥碳源溶出的影响机制[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(12): 7250-7259.
[10]	唐燕, 钟广宏, 李曦同, 高晓亚, 朱文杰, 罗永明. 冷轧污泥制备Fe/C催化剂催化降解苯酚[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(12): 7270-7280.
[11]	聂彦琪, 李祎璋, 何旭阳, 张丁元, 李卫华, 高伟杰, 赵长霞, 孙英杰, 孙浩然, 王玉凤, 朱金林, 卞荣星, 路成刚. 垃圾焚烧飞灰耦合建筑垃圾微粉-市政污泥烧结制备陶粒[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(12): 7281-7289.
[12]	李晨曦, 王志超, 李卫平, 托梓硕, 李志军, 李国文. 新型碳源聚乙醇酸对活性污泥性能及微生物群落的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(11): 6705-6715.
[13]	赵丽阳, 李倩, 何佩熹, 潘鸿辉, 刘艳, 刘细祥. 磷钼酸-Fe₃O₄球磨共改性污泥基生物炭对四环素的吸附特性[J]. 化工进展, 2025, 44(1): 583-595.
[14]	李松亚, 陈炳桦, 刘彪, 王林裴, 王乐, 谷得明, 周一鸣, 王笑艳. 污泥颗粒化过程中信号分子AI-2调控作用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(9): 5217-5225.
[15]	姚雪, 武淑慧, 杨阳, 王晓, 冯雷, 冯雪冬, 马艳飞. 含油污泥基生物炭处理含油废水[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(6): 3398-3409.