燃煤烟气湿法协同脱硫脱碳技术研究进展

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-1945

化工进展 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 2324-2342.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-1945

• 化石能源的清洁高效转化利用 • 上一篇

燃煤烟气湿法协同脱硫脱碳技术研究进展

高凡翔¹(), 刘阳¹, 张贵泉², 秦锋³, 姚建涛², 金辉¹, 师进文¹()

^1.西安交通大学动力工程多相流国家重点实验室，陕西西安 710049
^2.西安热工研究院有限公司，陕西西安 710054
^3.中海石油气电集团有限责任公司技术研发中心，北京 100028

收稿日期:2023-11-06 修回日期:2024-03-14 出版日期:2024-05-15 发布日期:2024-06-15
通讯作者: 师进文
作者简介:高凡翔（2000—），男，硕士研究生，研究方向为碳捕集和利用。E-mail：gfx2284217583@stu.xjtu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
陕西省重点研发计划(2023-YBSF-140);西安热工研究院有限公司研究开发基金(TD-23-TYK01);陕西省油气田特种增产技术重点实验室开放基金(KFJJ-YZ-2022-2)

Research progress of wet process synergistic desulfurization and decarbonization technology for coal-fired flue gas

GAO Fanxiang¹(), LIU Yang¹, ZHANG Guiquan², QIN Feng³, YAO Jiantao², JIN Hui¹, SHI Jinwen¹()

^1.State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, Shaanxi, China
^2.Xi’an Thermal Power Research Institute Co. , Ltd. , Xi’an 710054, Shaanxi, China
^3.R&D Center, CNOOC Gas & Power Group Co. , Ltd. , Beijing 100028, China

Received:2023-11-06 Revised:2024-03-14 Online:2024-05-15 Published:2024-06-15
Contact: SHI Jinwen

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

燃煤烟气中SO₂和CO₂的处理逐渐向协同脱除方向发展，基于湿法脱硫和脱碳的组合技术因此获得了广泛关注。本文首先系统梳理了梯级（依次）脱硫脱碳技术的重点研究方向，认为SO₂的胺降解作用是该类技术面对的核心问题，但其影响机理尚未形成统一共识。从控制排放和预防降解两个角度出发，分析了强化脱硫技术和胺降解抑制剂对缓解SO₂不利影响的作用。与梯级处理相比，联合（同步）脱硫脱碳技术可基于单一溶剂实现循环吸收-解吸。然后总结了钙法、氨法、胺法等联合脱硫脱碳（联脱）技术的最新进展，梳理并对比了各类吸收体系的原理和工艺设计，其中基于氨水的联脱工艺研究最为成熟。还简述了两类协同脱除技术的优缺点和发展前景。最后，建议对于梯级脱硫脱碳技术未来应重点关注SO₂的胺降解机理及其在开发预防降解措施中的作用，对于联脱技术应加强反应理论和集成工艺建模研究等。

关键词: 煤燃烧, 烟气, 二氧化碳捕集, 脱硫, 集成

Abstract:

Treatment of the SO₂ and CO₂ in coal-fired flue gas is gradually developing to remove them simultaneously, and combined technologies based on the wet process of desulfurization and decarbonization have thus gained wide attention. Firstly, this paper systematically reviewed the main research directions of the stepwise (sequential) SO₂ and CO₂ removal technology. It was found that amine degradation caused by SO₂ is the core problem for this technology, but the mechanism was still in debate. The roles of desulfurization intensification and amine degradation inhibitors in alleviating the negative effects of SO₂ were analyzed from the perspectives of emission control and degradation prevention, respectively. Compared with stepwise treatment, the simultaneous SO₂ and CO₂ removal technology could achieve cyclic absorption and desorption based on a single solvent. Therefore, the latest progress of the simultaneous SO₂ and CO₂ removal technology was then summarized, including those using calcium-based, ammonia-based, and amine-based solvents. The principles and process design of each type of absorption system were sorted out and compared, and the most developed one was the ammonia-based combined processes. This paper also briefly described the advantages, disadvantages and development prospects of the two types of synergistic removal technologies. Finally, this paper suggested that future attention for the stepwise SO₂ and CO₂ removal technology should be focused on the mechanism of SO₂caused_{amine degradation and its role in the development of degradation prevention measures, while for the combined removal technology, studies on reaction theory and integrated process modeling should be pursued.}

Key words: coal combustion, flue gas, CO₂ capture, desulfurization, integration

中图分类号:

X511

高凡翔, 刘阳, 张贵泉, 秦锋, 姚建涛, 金辉, 师进文. 燃煤烟气湿法协同脱硫脱碳技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(5): 2324-2342.

GAO Fanxiang, LIU Yang, ZHANG Guiquan, QIN Feng, YAO Jiantao, JIN Hui, SHI Jinwen. Research progress of wet process synergistic desulfurization and decarbonization technology for coal-fired flue gas[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024, 43(5): 2324-2342.

图/表 13

图1 采用梯级脱硫脱碳技术的烟气净化系统示意图

表1 燃煤电厂石灰石/石膏湿法FGD系统超低排放改造项目

改造类型	改造项目或地点	改造方案	SO₂排放浓度（标准）/mg·m^-3		脱硫效率/%		完工时间 /年
改造类型	改造项目或地点	改造方案	改造前	改造后	改造前	改造后	完工时间 /年
喷淋层	攀枝花某企业小型锅炉^[51]	增设一层冲洗水层，缩短喷嘴与除雾器间距，优化冲洗水管及相关配套设施等	$≤$ 600	78~126	$≥$ 90	98.5~99.0	2016
喷淋层	魏家峁电厂^[50]	采用一层旋流和三层喷淋，增加每层喷淋喷嘴数等	130	<23	>95	>99	2017
托盘塔	某660MW超临界燃煤机组^[53]	采用双托盘，拆除回转式烟气换热器（GGH），增加液气比等	111	<35	91.5~92.5	$≤$ 99	2012
托盘塔	华能集团滇东电厂3号和4号机组^[54]	采用双托盘，增设喷淋层，拆除GGH，布置3级高效屋脊式除雾器及冲洗水系统等	—	<35	—	—	2018
单塔双区	某公司二期630MW电厂^[55]	对吸收塔两段环切加高，优化改进配套设备等	100	$≤$ 32	96	$≥$ 98.9	2018
单塔双循环	山西某超低排放项目^[57]	升级原塔，新建塔外循环塔和配套的浆液循环泵等	$≤$ 200	<35	$≥$ 95.2	$≥$ 99.2	2015
单塔双循环	某1000MW燃煤电厂^[58]	拆除原塔并建新塔和一座循环浆液槽	100~175	$≤$ 35	95	$≥$ 99	2016
双塔双循环	大唐集团河北某600MW发电厂^[59]	新建一级吸收塔与原吸收塔（二级）串联	110~170	<35	95	>99	2014
	国电谏壁发电厂8号机组^[60]	利用7号机组旧塔与8号机组旧塔组合形成双塔双循环	>50	22.43	95	>99.3	2014
	任丘2×300MW燃煤电厂^[61]	新建二级吸收塔与原吸收塔（一级）串联	163.49	20.65	93.07	99.47	2018
	某350MW燃煤电厂^[62]	新建二级吸收塔与原吸收塔（一级）串联	107	27	96.5	99.3	2018
	华能集团滇东电厂1号和2号机组^[54]	新建二级吸收塔与原吸收塔（一级）串联	$≤$ 600	<35	—	99.53	2018
其他	宁夏某2×350MW燃煤电厂^[63]	增大塔壁板高度，增加喷淋层，扩大浆池容积等	>50	35	>98.675	>99.08	2020
	某3×50MW抽凝式发电机组^[64]	新建塔形成“一炉一塔”，原塔新增脱硫增效协同除尘设置，改用三级屋脊式高效除雾器及冲洗水系统等	89.6	9.7	—	98.8~99.7	2022
	某2×600MW燃煤电厂^[65]	新增浆液再循环装置，差异化布置喷嘴，升级除雾器等	> 45	<35	—	>95	2022
	兰州石化公司燃煤锅炉^[66]	新建塔形成“一炉一塔”，原塔喷淋层增设湍流器和偏转环	$≤$ 50	$≤$ 30	—	99	2023

表1 燃煤电厂石灰石/石膏湿法FGD系统超低排放改造项目

改造类型	改造项目或地点	改造方案	SO₂排放浓度（标准）/mg·m^-3		脱硫效率/%		完工时间 /年
改造类型	改造项目或地点	改造方案	改造前	改造后	改造前	改造后	完工时间 /年
喷淋层	攀枝花某企业小型锅炉^[51]	增设一层冲洗水层，缩短喷嘴与除雾器间距，优化冲洗水管及相关配套设施等	$≤$ 600	78~126	$≥$ 90	98.5~99.0	2016
喷淋层	魏家峁电厂^[50]	采用一层旋流和三层喷淋，增加每层喷淋喷嘴数等	130	<23	>95	>99	2017
托盘塔	某660MW超临界燃煤机组^[53]	采用双托盘，拆除回转式烟气换热器（GGH），增加液气比等	111	<35	91.5~92.5	$≤$ 99	2012
托盘塔	华能集团滇东电厂3号和4号机组^[54]	采用双托盘，增设喷淋层，拆除GGH，布置3级高效屋脊式除雾器及冲洗水系统等	—	<35	—	—	2018
单塔双区	某公司二期630MW电厂^[55]	对吸收塔两段环切加高，优化改进配套设备等	100	$≤$ 32	96	$≥$ 98.9	2018
单塔双循环	山西某超低排放项目^[57]	升级原塔，新建塔外循环塔和配套的浆液循环泵等	$≤$ 200	<35	$≥$ 95.2	$≥$ 99.2	2015
单塔双循环	某1000MW燃煤电厂^[58]	拆除原塔并建新塔和一座循环浆液槽	100~175	$≤$ 35	95	$≥$ 99	2016
双塔双循环	大唐集团河北某600MW发电厂^[59]	新建一级吸收塔与原吸收塔（二级）串联	110~170	<35	95	>99	2014
	国电谏壁发电厂8号机组^[60]	利用7号机组旧塔与8号机组旧塔组合形成双塔双循环	>50	22.43	95	>99.3	2014
	任丘2×300MW燃煤电厂^[61]	新建二级吸收塔与原吸收塔（一级）串联	163.49	20.65	93.07	99.47	2018
	某350MW燃煤电厂^[62]	新建二级吸收塔与原吸收塔（一级）串联	107	27	96.5	99.3	2018
	华能集团滇东电厂1号和2号机组^[54]	新建二级吸收塔与原吸收塔（一级）串联	$≤$ 600	<35	—	99.53	2018
其他	宁夏某2×350MW燃煤电厂^[63]	增大塔壁板高度，增加喷淋层，扩大浆池容积等	>50	35	>98.675	>99.08	2020
	某3×50MW抽凝式发电机组^[64]	新建塔形成“一炉一塔”，原塔新增脱硫增效协同除尘设置，改用三级屋脊式高效除雾器及冲洗水系统等	89.6	9.7	—	98.8~99.7	2022
	某2×600MW燃煤电厂^[65]	新增浆液再循环装置，差异化布置喷嘴，升级除雾器等	> 45	<35	—	>95	2022
	兰州石化公司燃煤锅炉^[66]	新建塔形成“一炉一塔”，原塔喷淋层增设湍流器和偏转环	$≤$ 50	$≤$ 30	—	99	2023

图2 不同强化脱硫的改造技术比较1—喷淋层；2—托盘塔；3—单塔双区；4—单塔双循环；5—双塔双循环

图3 硫化前碳化/煅烧的钙法联脱工艺示意图[82]

图4 硫化后碳化/煅烧的钙法联脱工艺示意图[86]

图5 Munmorah试验工厂基于氨水的“双塔联脱”工艺示意图[91]

图6 基于氨水的“单塔联脱”工艺示意图[92]

图7 新建燃煤电站集成基于氨水的“单塔两级联脱”工艺示意图[93]

图8 基于氨水的“双塔两级联脱”工艺示意图[94]

图9 基于有机胺的“单塔两级联脱-双塔再生”工艺示意图[99]

图10 基于有机胺的组合捕获工艺CS-Cap示意图[21]

表2 国内外运行中的燃煤烟气CCUS项目

地点	名称	规模	溶剂类型	能耗/GJ·t^-1	时间/年
美国	Warrior Run示范项目	150t/d	MEA	—	2000
美国	Petro Nova碳捕集项目	1.4×10⁶t/a	KS-1	2.4	2017
德国	Staudinger电站中试项目	—	氨基酸	2.7	2009
德国	Wilhelmshaven电站中试项目	70t/d	二甘醇胺	2.7	2012
加拿大	Boundary Dam项目	1×10⁶t/a	MEA	—	2014
澳大利亚	Hazelwood电站中试项目	1t/d	碳酸钾	2.5	2011
中国	华能北京热电厂中试项目	3000t/a	MEA	—	2008
	华能上海石洞口示范项目	1.2×10⁵t/a	MEA	3	2009
	胜利发电厂100t/a CO₂捕集纯化工程	100t/d	新型MSA复合吸收剂	5.95	2012
	长春热电厂相变型碳捕集工业装置	1000t/a	相变吸收剂	2.3	2020
	国能锦界1.5×10⁵t/a CCUS示范项目	1.5×10⁵t/a	复合胺（多氨基胺及位阻胺）	2.4	2021
	齐鲁石化-胜利油田百万吨级CCUS项目	1t/a	新型MSA复合吸收剂	—	2022

表3 不同协同脱硫脱碳技术的对比

技术类型	优点	缺点
梯级脱硫脱碳技术	1.技术成熟，工程经验丰富	1.占地空间大，不易维护
	2.易于在已有电站改造（无论是否有FGD系统）	2.能耗高
	3.脱硫和脱碳系统便于各自调控实现高脱除率	3.烟气成分对脱碳剂的影响大
联合脱硫脱碳技术	1.节能潜力大	1.技术不成熟，工程经验极少
	2.占地空间小，运行维护方便	2.不适合已有FGD系统的电站改造
		3.单一吸收剂的用量更大，使吸收效率受影响，设备更易腐蚀、胺损耗更严重等

参考文献 113

1	HAO Yu, WANG Lingou, FAN Weiyang, et al. What determines China’s electricity consumption? New evidence using the logarithmic mean Divisia index method[J]. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2018, 10(1): 015909.
2	LIN Boqiang, OMOJU Oluwasola E, OKONKWO Jennifer U. Factors influencing renewable electricity consumption in China[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 55: 687-696.
3	中华人民共和国国家统计局. 中国第三产业统计年鉴-2012[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2012.
	National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China. China statistical yearbook of the tertiary industry[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2012.
4	顾晨, 赵瑜. 中国燃煤电厂大气污染物排放研究进展[J]. 煤炭学报, 2022, 47(12): 4352-4361.
	GU Chen, ZHAO Yu. Research progress of air pollutant emissions of Chinese coal-fired power plants[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(12): 4352-4361.
5	国家能源局西北监管局. 2022年我国煤炭消费量占能源消费总量56.2%[EB/OL]. (2023-03-28) [2023-12-23]. .
	Northwest Supervision Bureau of the National Energy Administration. China’s coal consumption accounts for 56.2% of total energy consumption in 2022[EB/OL]. (2023-03-28) [2023-12-23]. .
6	GUO Yiqi, ZHU Lisha, WANG Xiaopeng, et al. Assessing environmental impact of NO _x and SO₂ emissions in textiles production with chemical footprint[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 831: 154961.
7	FANG Mengxiang, YI Ningtong, DI Wentao, et al. Emission and control of flue gas pollutants in CO₂ chemical absorption system—A review[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, 93: 102904.
8	武春锦, 吕武华, 梅毅, 等. 湿法烟气脱硫技术及运行经济性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(12): 4368-4374.
	WU Chunjin, Wuhua LYU, MEI Yi, et al. Application and running economic analysis of wet flue gas desulfurization technology[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2015, 34(12): 4368-4374.
9	温翯, 韩伟, 车春霞, 等. 燃烧后二氧化碳捕集技术与应用进展[J]. 精细化工, 2022, 39(8): 1584-1595, 1632.
	WEN He, HAN Wei, CHE Chunxia, et al. Progress of post-combustion carbon dioxide capture technology development and applications[J]. Fine Chemicals, 2022, 39(8): 1584-1595, 1632.
10	王军锋, 李金, 徐惠斌, 等. 湿法脱硫协同去除细颗粒物的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(7): 3402-3411.
	WANG Junfeng, LI Jin, XU Huibin, et al. Advances in research on wet desulfurization and synergistic removal of fine particles[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(7): 3402-3411.
11	WANG Zhiping, Liyong LUN, TAN Zhongchao, et al. Simultaneous wet desulfurization and denitration by an oxidant absorbent of NaClO₂/CaO₂ [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26(28): 29032-29040.
12	DESHWAL Bal Raj, LEE Si Hyun, JUNG Jong Hyeon, et al. Study on the removal of NO _x from simulated flue gas using acidic NaClO₂ solution[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2008, 20(1): 33-38.
13	王大淇, 赵兵涛, 张梓均, 等. 氧化吸收法同步脱除燃烧烟气中SO₂, NO _x 和CO₂的化学热力学及其评价[J]. 上海理工大学学报, 2019, 41(2): 130-136.
	WANG Daqi, ZHAO Bingtao, ZHANG Zijun, et al. Thermodynamics and assessment of simultaneous removal of SO₂, NO _x and CO₂ from combustion flue gas by oxidation-absorption method[J]. Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 2019, 41(2): 130-136.
14	WU Ye, CHEN Xiaoping. The negative effects of SO₂ on CO₂capture with K₂CO₃/Al₂O₃ [J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2015, 122(2): 1041-1049.
15	COPPOLA Antonio, ESPOSITO Alessandro, MONTAGNARO Fabio, et al. The combined effect of H₂O and SO₂ on CO₂ uptake and sorbent attrition during fluidised bed calcium looping[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2019, 37(4): 4379-4387.
16	KIM Chaehoon, CHOI Woosung, CHOI Minkee. SO₂-resistant amine-containing CO₂ adsorbent with a surface protection layer[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(18): 16586-16593.
17	GAO Jubao, WANG Shujuan, WANG Jian, et al. Effect of SO₂ on the amine-based CO₂ capture solvent and improvement using ion exchange resins[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 37: 38-45.
18	张成芳. 醇胺溶液吸收硫化氢和二氧化碳第二部分同时吸收和吸收的选择性[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 1984, 13(6): 10-19.
	ZHANG Chengfang. Selectivity of simultaneous absorption and absorption of the second part of hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide absorbed by ethanolamine solution[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 1984, 13(6): 10-19.
19	NOLAN Paul S. Combined flue gas desulfurization and carbon dioxide removal system: US6399030 [P]. 2002-06-04.
20	CIFERNO Jared, P, SKONE Timothy, J, RAMEZAN Massood. Carbon capture at an existing power plant[J]. Power Engineering, 2008, 112(5): 68-69.
21	COUSINS Ashleigh, PEARSON Pauline, PUXTY Graeme, et al. Simulating combined SO₂ and CO₂ capture from combustion flue gas[J]. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 2019, 9(6): 1087-1095.
22	联合国. 联合国气候变化框架公约京都议定书[R]. (1997-12-11) [2023-12-24]. https://unfccc.int/documents/2409.
	United Nations. Kyoto protocol to the united nations framework convention on climate change[R]. (1997-12-11) [2023-12-24]. https://unfccc.int/documents/2409.
23	闫静, 吴晓清, 罗志云, 等. 国外大气污染防治现状综述[J]. 中国环保产业, 2016(2): 56-60.
	YAN Jing, WU Xiaoqing, LUO Zhiyun, et al. Review of air pollution prevention and control status in foreign countries[J]. China Environmental Protection Industry, 2016(2): 56-60.
24	张萍, 潘卫国, 郭瑞堂, 等. 燃煤烟气污染物协同控制技术的研究进展[J]. 应用化工, 2017, 46(12): 2447-2450.
	ZHANG Ping, PAN Weiguo, GUO Ruitang, et al. Advances in pollutants collaborative control technologies from coal-fired flue gas[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2017, 46(12): 2447-2450.
25	乔二浪, 乔林艳, 王有斌, 等. 浅析烟气脱硫工艺的优劣性[J]. 江西化工, 2022, 38(1): 92-94.
	QIAO Erlang, QIAO Linyan, WANG Youbin, et al. A brief analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the flue gas desulfurization process[J]. Jiangxi Chemical Industry, 2022, 38(1): 92-94.
26	WANG William, RAMKUMAR Shwetha, LI Songgeng, et al. Subpilot demonstration of the carbonation-calcination reaction (CCR) process: High-temperature CO₂ and sulfur capture from coal-fired power plants[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2010, 49(11): 5094-5101.
27	刘飞, 关键, 祁志福, 等. 燃煤电厂碳捕集、利用与封存技术路线选择[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 50(7): 1-13.
	LIU Fei, GUAN Jian, QI Zhifu, et al. Technology route selection for carbon capture utilization and storage in coal-fired power plants[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 50(7): 1-13.
28	WANG Meihong, JOEL Atuman S, RAMSHAW Colin, et al. Process intensification for post-combustion CO₂ capture with chemical absorption: A critical review[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 158: 275-291.
29	MISIAK Katarzyna, SANCHEZ Cristina Sanchez, Peter VAN OS, et al. Next generation post-combustion capture: Combined CO₂ and SO₂ removal[J]. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 1150-1159.
30	张琳, 瞿如敏, 王霞, 等. SO₂对膜吸收法捕集烟气中CO₂的影响[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2015, 35(12): 3047-3053.
	ZHANG Lin, QU Rumin, WANG Xia, et al. Experimental study on the effect of SO₂ on the absorption of CO₂ by membranes[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2015, 35(12): 3047-3053.
31	陆诗建, 耿春香, 赵东亚, 等. 基于AEEA的二元复合胺试剂吸收CO₂降解性能研究[J]. 高校化学工程学报, 2017, 31(6): 1442-1451.
	LU Shijian, GENG Chunxiang, ZHAO Dongya, et al. Study on the degradation of AEEA based mixed amines in CO₂ absorption[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 2017, 31(6): 1442-1451.
32	雷轩邈, 王甫, 朱先会, 等. 胺法碳捕集胺的降解与抑制方式的研究进展[J]. 高校化学工程学报, 2021, 35(6): 966-978.
	LEI Xuanmiao, WANG Fu, ZHU Xianhui, et al. Review on degradation and inhibition of amine from amine carbon capture processes[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 2021, 35(6): 966-978.
33	YAMADA Mutsuo, MURAKAMI Kazumi, Naoki ODA, et al. CO₂ removal technology from flue gases containing SO₂ at thermal power plants[J]. Journal of the Japan Institute of Energy, 1996, 75(8): 732-741.
34	WILSON M, TONTIWACHWUTHIKUL P, CHAKMA A, et al. Test results from a CO₂ extraction pilot plant at boundary dam coal-fired power station[J]. Energy, 2004, 29(9/10): 1259-1267.
35	KNUDSEN Jacob N, JENSEN Jørgen N, VILHELMSEN Poul-Jacob, et al. Experience with CO₂ capture from coal flue gas in pilot-scale: Testing of different amine solvents[J]. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1(1): 783-790.
36	SHAW Devin. Cansolv CO₂ capture: The value of integration[J]. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1(1): 237-246.
37	GAO Jubao, WANG Shujuan, ZHAO Bo, et al. Pilot-scale experimental study on the CO₂ capture process with existing of SO₂: Degradation, reaction rate, and mass transfer[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2011, 25(12): 5802-5809.
38	THOMPSON Jesse G, FRIMPONG Reynolds, REMIAS Joseph E, et al. Heat stable salt accumulation and solvent degradation in a pilot-scale CO₂ capture process using coal combustion flue gas[J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2014, 14(2): 550-558.
39	CHAHEN Ludovic, HUARD Thierry, CUCCIA Lorena, et al. Comprehensive monitoring of MEA degradation in a post-combustion CO₂ capture pilot plant with identification of novel degradation products in gaseous effluents[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2016, 51: 305-316.
40	UYANGA Itoro J, IDEM Raphael O. Studies of SO₂- and O₂-induced degradation of aqueous MEA during CO₂ capture from power plant flue gas streams[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2007, 46(8): 2558-2566.
41	SUPAP T, IDEM R, TONTIWACHWUTHIKUL P, et al. Kinetics of sulfur dioxide- and oxygen-induced degradation of aqueous monoethanolamine solution during CO₂ absorption from power plant flue gas streams[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2009, 3(2): 133-142.
42	高巨宝, 王淑娟, 周姗, 等. SO₂对碳捕集过程影响的实验研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2011, 31(5): 52-57.
	GAO Jubao, WANG Shujuan, ZHOU Shan, et al. Experimental study on the influence of SO₂ on the CO₂ capture process[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2011, 31(5): 52-57.
43	ZHOU Shan, WANG Shujuan, SUN Chenchen, et al. SO₂ effect on degradation of MEA and some other amines[J]. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 896-904.
44	SUN Chenchen, WANG Shujuan, ZHOU Shan, et al. SO₂ effect on monoethanolamine oxidative degradation in CO₂ capture process[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2014, 23: 98-104.
45	LIU Chang, ZHAO Zhongyang, SHAO Lingyu, et al. Experimental study and modified modeling on effect of SO₂ on CO₂ absorption using amine solution[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 448: 137751.
46	ROONEY P C, DUPART M S, BACON T R. Oxygen’ role in alkanolamine degradation[J]. Hydrocarbon Processing, 1998, 77(7): 109-113.
47	MARIIA Pasichnyk, PETR Stanovsky, PETR Polezhaev, et al. Membrane technology for challenging separations: Removal of CO₂, SO₂ and NO _x from flue and waste gases[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2023: 323.
48	ZHAO Y, ZHANG J, NIELSEN C P. The effects of energy paths and emission controls and standards on future trends in China’s emissions of primary air pollutants[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2014, 14(17): 8849-8868.
49	HOFELSAUER J, NOTTER W, MAROCCO L, et al. Improvement of SO₂ removal with application of wall rings and advanced CFD modelling—The FGD plant in the megalopolis power plant[J]. VGB Powertech, 2008, 88(3): 85-89.
50	史贵君. 魏家峁电厂660MW超临界机组脱硫超低排放改造研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2018.
	SHI Guijun. Study on desulfurization ultra-low emissions renovation of 660MW supercritical unit in Weijiamao power plant[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2018.
51	梁磊. 高浓度SO₂石灰石-石膏湿法脱硫系统升级改造及应用[J]. 电力科学与工程, 2016, 32(4): 71-74, 78．
	LIANG Lei. Upgrading reconstruction and application of high concentration SO₂ limestone gypsum wet desulfurization system[J]. Electric Power Science and Engineering, 2016, 32(4): 71-74, 78.
52	李兴华, 何育东. 燃煤火电机组SO₂超低排放改造方案研究[J]. 中国电力, 2015, 48(10): 148-151, 160.
	LI Xinghua, HE Yudong. Study on modification of ultra-low SO₂ emission in coal-fired power plants[J]. Electric Power, 2015, 48(10): 148-151, 160.
53	卢泓樾. 燃煤机组烟气污染物超低排放研究[J]. 电力科技与环保, 2014, 30(5): 8-11.
	LU Hongyue. Research of the domestic 600MW supercritical coal-fired units ultra in low emissions of flue gas[J]. Power Technology and Environmental Protection, 2014, 30(5): 8-11.
54	吴琼艳, 邹锐, 何佳, 等. 600MW“W”火焰炉超低排放改造方案研究与优化[C]// 2023年电力行业技术监督工作交流会暨专业技术论坛论文集(下册). 南宁, 2023: 1002-1007.
	WU Qiongyan, ZOU Rui, HE Jia, et al. Research and optimization of ultra-low emission transformation plan for 600MW “W” flame furnace[C]// Proceedings of the 2023 Power Industry Technical Supervision Work Exchange Meeting and Professional Technical Forum (Next Book). Nanning, 2023: 1002-1007.
55	张赢丹, 丁俊, 丁宏. 单塔双区脱硫技术在燃煤电厂中的应用[J]. 浙江电力, 2018, 37(3): 73-76．
	ZHANG Yingdan, DING Jun, DING Hong. Application of single tower and double zone desulphurization technology in coal-fired power plants[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2018, 37(3): 73-76.
56	何永胜, 高继贤, 陈泽民, 等. 单塔双区湿法高效脱硫技术应用[J]. 环境影响评价, 2015, 37(5): 52-56.
	HE Yongsheng, GAO Jixian, CHEN Zemin, et al. Application of “one-absorber two-sections” high efficiency wet flue gas desulfurization technology[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment, 2015, 37(5): 52-56.
57	霍玉涛, 刘丹丹. 单塔双循环技术在山西某超低排放项目上的应用[J]. 当代化工研究, 2023(3): 98-100.
	HUO Yutao, LIU Dandan. Single tower double cycle technology application in an ultra-low emission project in Shanxi Province[J]. Modern Chemical Research, 2023(3): 98-100.
58	刘同干. 单塔双循环脱硫技术在1000MW燃煤机组上的应用研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2019.
	LIU Tonggan. Application of single-tower double-cycle desulfurization technology in 1000MW coal-fired unit[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2019.
59	NIE Peng fei. Study of the capacity extension scheme for 600MW unit wet flue gas desulfurization in a power plant[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2015, 1092/1093: 917-922.
60	高广军, 赵家涛, 王玉祥, 等. 双塔双循环技术在火电厂脱硫改造中的应用[J]. 江苏电机工程, 2015, 34(4): 79-80.
	GAO Guangjun, ZHAO Jiatao, WANG Yuxiang, et al. Application of two tower-two cycle technique for desulphurization retrofit of coal-fired thermal power units[J]. Jiangsu Electrical Engineering, 2015, 34(4): 79-80.
61	郭健. 任丘电厂湿法脱硫双塔串联系统改造研究及应用[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2018.
	GUO Jian. Research and application of reformation for twin towers series system of wet desulphurization in Renqiu power plant[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2018.
62	张彦明. 火电燃煤机组脱硫超净改造工程实践研究[J]. 资源节约与环保, 2018(5): 17-18.
	ZHANG Yanming. Practical study on ultra-clean desulfurization reconstruction project of thermal power coal-fired units[J]. Resources Economization & Environmental Protection, 2018(5): 17-18.
63	钟洪禄, 刘涛, 杨利军, 等. 湿法烟气脱硫吸收塔顶升改造方案[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2020, 38(3): 176-180.
	ZHONG Honglu, LIU Tao, YANG Lijun, et al. Wet flue gas desulfurization absorption tower uplifting transformation scheme[J]. China Resources Comprehensive Utilization, 2020, 38(3): 176-180.
64	李健. 某燃煤电厂烟气超低排放改造工程案例[J]. 安徽化工, 2023, 49(3): 123-127.
	LI Jian. A case study of flue gas ultra-low emission transformation project of a coal-fired power plant[J]. Anhui Chemical Industry, 2023, 49(3): 123-127.
65	郭静静, 陈帅, 王匡. 火电厂湿法烟气脱硫系统技术改造实践[J]. 冶金能源, 2022, 41(5): 61-64.
	GUO Jingjing, CHEN Shuai, WANG Kuang. Technical reform practice of flue gas desulfurization system in thermal power plant[J]. Energy for Metallurgical Industry, 2022, 41(5): 61-64.
66	孙昀, 王辉. 兰州石化公司燃煤锅炉超低排放技术改造[J]. 化工安全与环境, 2023, 36(4): 47-52.
	SUN Yun, WANG Hui. Technical transformation of ultra-low emission of coal-fired boilers in Lanzhou Petrochemical Company[J]. Chemical Safety & Environment, 2023, 36(4): 47-52.
67	IDEM George S, ROCHELLE Gary T. Oxidation inhibitors for copper and iron catalyzed degradation of monoethanolamine in CO₂ capture processes[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2006, 45(8): 2513-2521.
68	IDEM Raphael, TONTIWACHWUTHIKUL Paitoon, SAIWAN Chintana, et al. Method for inhibiting amine degradation during CO2 capture from a gas stream: US8105420[P]. 2012-01-31.
69	SUPAP Teeradet, IDEM Raphael, TONTIWACHWUTHIKUL Paitoon, et al. Investigation of degradation inhibitors on CO₂ capture process[J]. Energy Procedia, 2011, 4: 583-590.
70	ZHAO Zhijun, DONG Haifeng, HUANG Ying, et al. Ionic degradation inhibitors and kinetic models for CO₂ capture with aqueous monoethanolamine[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 39: 119-128.
71	SEXTON Andrew J. Amine oxidation in carbon dioxide capture processes[D]. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin, 2008.
72	SEXTON Andrew J, ROCHELLE Gary T. Catalysts and inhibitors for oxidative degradation of monoethanolamine[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2009, 3(6): 704-711.
73	KOHL Arthur L, NIELSEN R. Gas purification[M]. Elsevier, 1997.
74	ISLAS Jorge, GRANDE Genice. Abatement costs of SO₂-control options in the Mexican electric-power sector[J]. Applied Energy, 2008, 85(2/3): 80-94.
75	HUTSON Nick D, KRZYZYNSKA Renata, SRIVASTAVA Ravi K. Simultaneous removal of SO₂, NO _x, and Hg from coal flue gas using a NaClO₂-enhanced wet scrubber[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2008, 47(16): 5825-5831.
76	张佩文. 多孔材料负载离子液体在吸收SO₂、NO₂、CO₂中的应用[D]. 石家庄: 河北科技大学, 2019.ZHANGPeiwen. Application of porous material loaded ionic liquids in absorption of SO2, NO2, CO2[D]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei University of Science and Technology, 2019.
77	陈姝晖, 伍岳, 张文祥, 等. 离子型有机多孔聚合物的制备及其烟气脱硫耦合脱碳性质[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 1028-1038.
	CHEN Shuhui, WU Yue, ZHANG Wenxiang, et al. Preparation of ionic organic porous polymer and its coupled desulfurization and decarbonization properties in flue gas[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(2): 1028-1038.
78	COPPOLA Antonio, SCALA Fabrizio. A preliminary techno-economic analysis on the calcium looping process with simultaneous capture of CO₂ and SO₂ from a coal-based combustion power plant[J]. Energies, 2020, 13(9): 2176.
79	王海堂, 张莹, 李挺, 等. 钙基脱硫剂在烟气脱硫中的研究现状分析[J]. 广东化工, 2023, 50(7): 159-160, 167.
	WANG Haitang, ZHANG Ying, LI Ting, et al. Analysis of the research status of calcium-based desulfurizers in flue gas desulfurization[J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2023, 50(7): 159-160, 167.
80	况文娟, 考宏涛, 任斌, 等. 钙基吸收剂循环吸收CO₂技术的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2011, 30(6): 1356-1360.
	KUANG Wenjuan, Hongtao KAO, REN Bin, et al. Research progress of cyclic absorbing CO₂ technology with Ca-based sorbents[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2011, 30(6): 1356-1360.
81	高生军, 段俊, 赵玲. 燃煤烟气脱硫脱硝脱碳一体化技术的研究进展[J]. 环境化学, 2021, 40(7): 2234-2245.
	GAO Shengjun, DUAN Jun, ZHAO Ling. Research progress on integrated technology for desulfurization, denitration and decarbonization of coal-fired flue gas[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2021, 40(7): 2234-2245.
82	SUN Ping, GRACE John R, Jim LIM C, et al. Sequential capture of CO₂ and SO₂ in a pressurized TGA simulating FBC conditions[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(8): 2943-2949.
83	郭名女, 张力, 唐强, 等. CaO/MgO和CaO/Ca₉Al₆O₁₈同时捕集CO₂/SO₂的循环吸收特性[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2012, 40(6): 757-762.
	GUO Mingnü, ZHANG Li, TANG Qiang, et al. Cyclic adsorption characteristic of CaO/MgO and CaO/Ca₉Al₆O₁₈ for simultaneous CO₂/SO₂ capture[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2012, 40(6): 757-762.
84	陈鸿伟, 赵争辉, 王为力. 石灰石联合脱碳脱硫影响因素及表面结构的分析[J]. 动力工程学报, 2013, 33(3): 210-217.
	CHEN Hongwei, ZHAO Zhenghui, WANG Weili. Factors influencing simultaneous CO₂/SO₂ capture by Ca-based sorbent and evolution of the limestone surface structure[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2013, 33(3): 210-217.
85	BASINAS Panagiotis, WU Yinghai, GRAMMELIS Panagiotis, et al. Effect of pressure and gas concentration on CO₂ and SO₂ capture performance of limestones[J]. Fuel, 2014, 122: 236-246.
86	薛章涵. 燃煤锅炉烟气脱硫脱碳单元与热力系统集成优化[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2017.
	XUE Zhanghan. Integrated optimization of flue gas desulphurization and decarbonization unit and power generation system in a coal-fired power plant[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2017.
87	余景文. 氨水溶液脱除燃煤电站烟气中二氧化碳能耗研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2016.
	YU Jingwen. Study on energy requirement for CO₂ capture with aqueous ammonia solution[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2016.
88	KIM You Jeong, YOU Jong Kyun, HONG Won Hi, et al. Characteristics of CO₂ absorption into aqueous ammonia[J]. Separation Science and Technology, 2008, 43(4): 766-777.
89	陈坡一. 氨法脱硫副产物亚硫酸铵浆液氧化技术[J]. 广州化工, 2013, 41(18): 149-151, 168.
	CHEN Poyi. The oxidation technology of ammonia desulfurization by-product ammonium sulfite slurry[J]. Guangzhou Chemical Industry, 2013, 41(18): 149-151, 168.
90	GAO Xiang, DING Honglei, DU Zhen, et al. Gas-liquid absorption reaction between (NH₄)₂SO₃ solution and SO₂ for ammonia-based wet flue gas desulfurization[J]. Applied Energy, 2010, 87(8): 2647-2651.
91	YU Hai, MORGAN Scott, ALLPORT Andrew, et al. Results from trialling aqueous NH₃ based post-combustion capture in a pilot plant at Munmorah power station: Absorption[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2011, 89(8): 1204-1215.
92	齐国杰, 王淑娟, 余景文, 等. 氨水溶液联合脱除燃煤烟气中CO₂和SO₂的模拟和经济性分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2013, 33(17): 16-23, 6.
	QI Guojie, WANG Shujuan, YU Jingwen, et al. Modeling and economic analysis on combined capture of CO₂ and SO₂ in flue gas using aqueous ammonia[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2013, 33(17): 16-23, 6.
93	LI Kangkang, YU Hai, YAN Shuiping, et al. Technoeconomic assessment of an advanced aqueous ammonia-based postcombustion capture process integrated with a 650-MW coal-fired power station[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(19): 10746-10755.
94	JIANG Kaiqi, YU Hai, CHEN Linghong, et al. An advanced, ammonia-based combined NO _x /SO _x /CO₂ emission control process towards a low-cost, clean coal technology[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 260: 114316.
95	徐学基. 可循环胺类吸收剂用于烟气脱硫脱碳的研究[D]. 青岛: 青岛科技大学, 2017.
	XU Xueji. The study on recyclable amine absorber used for flue gas desulfurization decarburization[D]. Qingdao: Qingdao University of Science & Technology, 2017.
96	梁锋. 有机胺法脱除二氧化硫工艺技术进展[J]. 硫酸工业, 2019(10): 14-19.
	LIANG Feng. Technological progress of sulphur dioxide removal by organic amines method[J]. Sulphuric Acid Industry, 2019(10): 14-19.
97	符乐, 杨阳, 徐文青, 等. 新型相变有机胺吸收捕集CO₂技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 2068-2080.
	FU Le, YANG Yang, XU Wenqing, et al. Research progress in CO₂ capture technology using novel biphasic organic amine absorbent[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(4): 2068-2080.
98	YU Y S, LI Y, LI Q, et al. An innovative process for simultaneous removal of CO₂ and SO₂ from flue gas of a power plant by energy integration[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2009, 50(12): 2885-2892.
99	晋旭东, 马晓峰. 利用有机胺进行烟气中SO₂和CO₂双脱的探讨[J]. 山西电力, 2015(6): 66-69.
	JIN Xudong, MA Xiaofeng. Using organic amine to remove SO₂ and CO₂ from flue gas[J]. Shanxi Electric Power, 2015(6): 66-69.
100	LIU Yu, ZHAO Ercheng, ZHU Wentao, et al. Determination of four heterocyclic insecticides by ionic liquid dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction in water samples[J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 2009, 1216(6): 885-891.
101	Gregorio GARCÍA, ATILHAN Mert, APARICIO Santiago. Simultaneous CO₂ and SO₂ capture by using ionic liquids: A theoretical approach[J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2017, 19(7): 5411-5422.
102	WANG Kai, XU Weijie, WANG Qinglian, et al. Rational design and screening of ionic liquid absorbents for simultaneous and stepwise separations of SO₂ and CO₂ from flue gas[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2022, 61(6): 2548-2561.
103	CHEN Zhaoyang, CHEN Chao, ZHANG Yu, et al. Carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide capture from flue gas by gas hydrate based process[J]. Energy Procedia, 2017, 142: 3454-3459.
104	罗沁澜, 张义锋, 李娜, 等. 复合胺砜溶液同时吸收并分部解吸CO₂/SO₂/NO _x 循环实验研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2016, 37(6): 1237-1242.
	LUO Qinlan, ZHANG Yifeng, LI Na, et al. Experimental studies on absorption and regeneration performance of compound amine sulphone solvents on CO₂, SO₂ and NO _x capture[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2016, 37(6): 1237-1242.
105	CHOI Won-Joon, MIN Byoung-Moo, SHON Byung-Hyun, et al. Characteristics of absorption/regeneration of CO₂-SO₂ binary systems into aqueous AMP+ ammonia solutions[J]. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2009, 15(5): 635-640.
106	LI Yang, WANG H Paul, LIAO Changyu, et al. Dual alkali solvent system for CO₂ capture from flue gas[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(15): 8824-8831.
107	刘克峰, 刘陶然, 蔡勇, 等. 二氧化碳捕集技术研究和工程示范进展[J/OL]. 化工进展, 2024 [2023-12-29]. .
	LIU Kefeng, LIU Taoran, CAI Yong, et al. Progress in research and engineering demonstration of CO₂ capture technology[J/OL]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024 [2023-12-29]. .
108	DAVOODI Shadfar, Mohammed AL-SHARGABI, WOOD David A, et al. Review of technological progress in carbon dioxide capture, storage, and utilization[J]. Gas Science and Engineering, 2023, 117: 205070.
109	WAPPEL David, KHAN Ash, SHALLCROSS David, et al. The effect of SO₂ on CO₂ absorption in an aqueous potassium carbonate solvent[J]. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1(1): 125-131.
110	MANTRIPRAGADA Hari C, ZHAI Haibo, RUBIN Edward S. Boundary Dam or Petra Nova—Which is a better model for CCS energy supply?[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2019, 82: 59-68.
111	GARG Bharti, HAQUE Nawshad, COUSINS Ashleigh, et al. Techno-economic evaluation of amine-reclamation technologies and combined CO₂/SO₂ capture for Australian coal-fired plants[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, 98: 103065.
112	IEA. Net Zero Roadmap: A global pathway to keep the 1.5℃ goal in reach[R/OL]. (2023-09) [2023-12-31]. .
113	IEA. CCUS policies and business models: Building a commercial market[R/OL]. (2023-11) [2023-12-31]. .

[1]	孙伟吉, 刘浪, 方治余, 朱梦博, 解耿, 何伟, 高宇恒. 改性镁渣的湿法碳酸化工艺[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(4): 2161-2173.
[2]	高康, 张弦, 陈帅军, 武喜明, 申峻, 王玉高, 牛艳霞. 湿法脱硫中多硫离子分离方法的建立[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(4): 2210-2218.
[3]	郭萌, 郭美欣, 魏思佳, 赵玉娇, 贾璇. 初始pH调控对MEC脱硫性能的影响及其微生物作用机制[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(4): 2219-2225.
[4]	谷星朋, 马红钦, 刘嘉豪. 雷尼镍的磷量子点改性及其催化加氢脱硫性能[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(3): 1293-1301.
[5]	徐泽文, 王明, 王强, 侯影飞. 胺基材料在二氧化碳分离膜领域研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(3): 1374-1386.
[6]	张鑫, 汤吉昀, 陈娟, 宋占龙, 董勇, 姚洪. 高温烟气热解废轮胎过程中痕量金属Cu、Pb的迁移特性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(3): 1606-1613.
[7]	张瑞凯, 张会书, 郑龙云, 曾爱武. CO₂吸收过程中气相分压对Rayleigh对流传质特性的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(2): 913-924.
[8]	陈晓贞, 刘丽, 杨成敏, 郑步梅, 尹晓莹, 孙进, 姚运海, 段为宇. 氧化铝基加氢脱硫催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(2): 948-961.
[9]	孙进, 陈晓贞, 刘名瑞, 刘丽, 牛世坤, 郭蓉. 加氢脱硫催化剂钠中毒失活机理[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(1): 407-413.
[10]	杨雪, 刘可, 张程翔, 李东霖, 王江芹, 杨万亮. 2D层状材料的燃料油氧化脱硫研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(1): 422-436.
[11]	戴欢涛, 曹苓玉, 游新秀, 徐浩亮, 汪涛, 项玮, 张学杨. 木质素浸渍柚子皮生物炭吸附CO₂特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 356-363.
[12]	盛维武, 程永攀, 陈强, 李小婷, 魏嘉, 李琳鸽, 陈险峰. 微气泡和微液滴双强化脱硫反应器操作分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 142-147.
[13]	王胜岩, 邓帅, 赵睿恺. 变电吸附二氧化碳捕集技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 233-245.
[14]	赖诗妮, 江丽霞, 李军, 黄宏宇, 小林敬幸. 含碳掺氨燃料的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4603-4615.
[15]	王云刚, 焦健, 邓世丰, 赵钦新, 邵怀爽. 冷凝换热与协同脱硫性能实验分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4230-4237.

燃煤烟气湿法协同脱硫脱碳技术研究进展

Research progress of wet process synergistic desulfurization and decarbonization technology for coal-fired flue gas

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 113

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价