炼化污水中低温水解酸化性能及微生物特性对比

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-1045

化工进展 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8): 4654-4663.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-1045

• 资源与环境化工 • 上一篇

炼化污水中低温水解酸化性能及微生物特性对比

姜梁妍¹(), 王庆宏¹, 李晋¹, 梁家豪², 尚鹏寅¹, 宋艳珂¹, 李琢宇¹(), 陈春茂¹

^1.中国石油大学（北京）化学工程与环境学院，重质油全国重点实验室，北京 102249
^2.广东石油化工学院环境科学与工程学院，广东省石油化工污染过程与控制重点实验室，广东茂名 525000

收稿日期:2023-06-25 修回日期:2023-09-22 出版日期:2024-08-15 发布日期:2024-09-02
通讯作者: 李琢宇
作者简介:姜梁妍（1996—），女，博士研究生，研究方向为生物环境化工。E-mail：ly_jiang5660@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(22278434);茂名市科技计划(2022S041);广东石油化工学院人才引进项目(RC-XJ2022000702)

Comparison of hydrolysis and acidification performance and microbial characteristics of refinery wastewater at mesophilic and psychrophilic temperatures

JIANG Liangyan¹(), WANG Qinghong¹, LI Jin¹, LIANG Jiahao², SHANG Pengyin¹, SONG Yanke¹, LI Zhuoyu¹(), CHEN Chunmao¹

^1.State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, College of Chemicial Engineering and Environment, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
^2.Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Pollution Process and Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, Maoming 525000, Guangdong, China

Received:2023-06-25 Revised:2023-09-22 Online:2024-08-15 Published:2024-09-02
Contact: LI Zhuoyu

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以炼化污水为研究对象，对比了中温和低温条件下的水解酸化性能、微生物群落结构和功能。中温（35℃）水解酸化更利于COD去除（40.51%）和水质可生化性提高（BOD₅/COD提高至0.53），而低温（15℃）COD去除率和BOD₅/COD仅为20.96%和0.26。中温条件有助于难降解化合物（O₃S₁和O₄S₁）的水解转化，与低温水解酸化相比，中温条件能够产生更多种类的小分子有机物。水解酸化微生物的宏基因组测序结果表明中温条件更利于微生物生长，有机物降解菌unclassified_p_Chloroflexi和可分泌水解酶的unclassified_o_Bacteroidales丰度较高。中温水解酸化富集了ko00643（苯乙烯降解）、ko00633（硝基甲苯降解）、ko00622（二甲苯降解）、ko00364（氟苯甲酸酯降解）、ko00642（乙苯降解）和ko00365（糠醛降解）等功能基因，促进了芳香类及含氮污染物的降解和出水可生化性能的提高。本研究揭示了炼化污水中低温水解酸化的水质变化及微生物特性。

关键词: 炼化污水, 中低温水解酸化, 有机物组成, 宏基因组, 厌氧, 生物技术

Abstract:

The performance of hydrolysis and acidification under mesophilic and psychrophilic conditions were compared, as well as the microbial community structure and function were analyzed. Hydrolytic acidification at 35℃ was more favorable for COD removal (40.51%) and improvement of biodegradability (0.53 of BOD₅/COD). COD removal efficiency and BOD₅/COD was only 20.96% and 0.26 under psychrophilic condition, respectively. Mesophilic condition facilitated for the hydrolysis and bioconversion of refractory organic compounds (O₃S₁ and O₄S₁). Mesophilic hydrolytic acidification could generate more micromolecular organic compounds in comparison of psychrophilic one. Metagenomic sequencing of hydrolytic acidification microorganisms indicated that mesophilic temperature was more favorable for microbial growth, with higher abundance of organic degrading bacteria of unclassified_p_Chloroflexi and hydrolase secretion bacteria of unclassified_o_Bacteroidales. Moreover, mesophilic condition enriched functional genes of ko00643(styrene degradation), ko00633 (nitrotoluene degradation), ko00622 (xylene degradation), ko00364 (fluorobenzoate degradation), ko00642 (ethylbenzene degradation) and ko00365 (furfural degradation), which promoted the degradation of aromatic and nitrogenous pollutants as well as improvement of the effluent biodegradability. This study revealed the variation of water quality and the characteristics of microbial community under mesophilic and psychrophilic hydrolytic acidification of refinery wastewater.

Key words: refinery wastewater, hydrolysis and acidification at mesophilic and psychrophilic temperatures, organic composition, metagenome, anaerobic, biotechnology

中图分类号:

X703.1

姜梁妍, 王庆宏, 李晋, 梁家豪, 尚鹏寅, 宋艳珂, 李琢宇, 陈春茂. 炼化污水中低温水解酸化性能及微生物特性对比[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(8): 4654-4663.

JIANG Liangyan, WANG Qinghong, LI Jin, LIANG Jiahao, SHANG Pengyin, SONG Yanke, LI Zhuoyu, CHEN Chunmao. Comparison of hydrolysis and acidification performance and microbial characteristics of refinery wastewater at mesophilic and psychrophilic temperatures[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024, 43(8): 4654-4663.

图/表 7

图1 实验装置

图2 中温和低温水解酸化反应器的性能

图3 水解酸化进出水分子量分布和物质类型数量变化

图4 水解酸化进出DOM类型分布

图5 层级聚类分析

图6 水解酸化细菌群落分析

图7 KEGG代谢功能基因相对丰度对比

参考文献 49

1	AMIN Farrukh Raza, KHALID Habiba, EL-MASHAD Hamed M, et al. Functions of bacteria and Archaea participating in the bioconversion of organic waste for methane production[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 763: 143007.
2	ZHANG Zhuowei, YU Yin, XI Hongbo, et al. Review of micro-aeration hydrolysis acidification for the pretreatment of toxic and refractory organic wastewater[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 317: 128343.
3	HUO Shuhao, ZHU Feifei, ZOU Bin, et al. A two-stage system coupling hydrolytic acidification with algal microcosms for treatment of wastewater from the manufacture of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) resin[J]. Biotechnology Letters, 2018, 40(4): 689-696.
4	RAZA Waseem, LEE Jechan, RAZA Nadeem, et al. Removal of phenolic compounds from industrial waste water based on membrane-based technologies[J]. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2019, 71: 1-18.
5	NARAYAN THORAT Bhaskar, KUMAR SONWANI Ravi. Current technologies and future perspectives for the treatment of complex petroleum refinery wastewater: A review[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2022, 355: 127263.
6	SONG Guangqing, XI Hongbo, ZHOU Yuexi, et al. Influence of organic load rate (OLR) on the hydrolytic acidification of 2-butenal manufacture wastewater and analysis of bacterial community structure[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 243: 502-511.
7	VEEKEN Adrie, HAMELERS Bert. Effect of temperature on hydrolysis rates of selected biowaste components[J]. Bioresource Technology, 1999, 69(3): 249-254.
8	刘豪. 水解酸化-BSBR处理印染废水试验研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2007.
	LIU Hao. Experimental study on treatment of printing and dyeing wastewater by hydrolytic acidification-BSBR[D]. Xi'an: Changan University, 2007.
9	LUO Xuan, LIU Yuhuan, MUHMOOD Atif, et al. Effect of time and temperature of pretreatment and anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and swine wastewater by domesticated paddy soil microbes[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 323: 116218.
10	VERMOREL N, SAN-VALERO P, IZQUIERDO M, et al. Anaerobic degradation of 2-propanol: Laboratory and pilot-scale studies[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2017, 172: 42-51.
11	苏大雄. 改良型水解酸化池运行效果与微生物菌群分析[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2020, 38(1): 190-193.
	SU Daxiong. Analysis on operation results by modified hydrolytic acidification process and microbial community[J]. China Resources Comprehensive Utilization, 2020, 38(1): 190-193.
12	曾薇, 郭京京, 纪兆华, 等. pH值对剩余污泥微氧水解酸化溶出物及微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2018, 26(3): 471-482.
	ZENG Wei, GUO Jingjing, JI Zhaohua, et al. Effect of p H values on hydrolysis and acidfication of waste activated sludge and microbial community structures at microaerobic conditions[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2018, 26(3): 471-482.
13	ZEPPILLI Marco, VILLANO Marianna, AULENTA Federico, et al. Effect of the anode feeding composition on the performance of a continuous-flow methane-producing microbial electrolysis cell[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015, 22(10): 7349-7360.
14	DEDKOV Yu M, ELIZAROVA O V, S Yu KEL'INA. Dichromate method for the determination of chemical oxygen demand[J]. Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2000, 55(8): 777-781.
15	中华人民共和国生态环境部. 水质pH值的测定电极法: [S]. 北京: 中国环境出版集团, 2020.
	Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China. Water quality—Determination of pH—Electrode method: [S]. Beijing: China Environmental Publishing Group, 2020.
16	林奕, 李国文, 普学伟, 等. 稀释接种法和压差法在五日生化需氧量测定中的方法比对[J]. 节能与环保, 2020(10): 86-87.
	LIN Yi, LI Guowen, PU Xuewei, et al. Comparison of dilution inoculation method and differential pressure method in five-day biochemical oxygen demand determination[J]. Energy Conservation & Environmental Protection, 2020(10): 86-87.
17	LIANG Jiahao, CHEN Chunmao, YOZA Brandon A, et al. Hydrolysis and acidification of activated sludge from a petroleum refinery[J]. Petroleum Science, 2019, 16(2): 428-438.
18	FANG Zhi, LI Lijie, JIANG Bin, et al. Molecular composition and transformation of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in coal gasification wastewater[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2019, 33(4): 3003-3011.
19	LI Ruiqiang, LI Yingrui, KRISTIANSEN Karsten, et al. SOAP: Short oligonucleotide alignment program[J]. Bioinformatics, 2008, 24(5): 713-714.
20	SONG Guangqing, YU Yin, LIU Tao, et al. Performance of microaeration hydrolytic acidification process in the pretreatment of 2-butenal manufacture wastewater[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 369: 465-473.
21	Lisandra ROCHA-MENESES, ZANNERNI Rawan, INAYAT Abrar, et al. Current progress in anaerobic digestion reactors and parameters optimization[J]. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2022: 1-24.
22	WU Changyong, ZHOU Yuexi, WANG Peichao, et al. Improving hydrolysis acidification by limited aeration in the pretreatment of petrochemical wastewater[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 194: 256-262.
23	Lotta LEVÉN, Anna SCHNÜRER. Effects of temperature on biological degradation of phenols, benzoates and phthalates under methanogenic conditions[J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2005, 55(2): 153-160.
24	LEITÃO Renato Carrhá, VAN HAANDEL Adrianus Cornelius, ZEEMAN Grietje, et al. The effects of operational and environmental variations on anaerobic wastewater treatment systems: A review[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2006, 97(9): 1105-1118.
25	Jon GARCIA-AGUIRRE, AYMERICH Enrique, DE GOÑI Jaime González-Mtnez, et al. Selective VFA production potential from organic waste streams: Assessing temperature and pH influence[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 244: 1081-1088.
26	NIE Erqi, HE Pinjing, ZHANG Hua, et al. How does temperature regulate anaerobic digestion?[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 150: 111453.
27	LI Dandan, FAN Jinjuan, ZHANG Xinyu, et al. Hydrolase kinetics to detect temperature-related changes in the rates of soil organic matter decomposition[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2017, 81: 108-115.
28	WANG Yu, WANG Qinghong, LI Min, et al. An alternative anaerobic treatment process for treatment of heavy oil refinery wastewater containing polar organics[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 105: 44-51.
29	MORGAN-SAGASTUME F, JACOBSSON S, OLSSON L E, et al. Anaerobic treatment of oil-contaminated wastewater with methane production using anaerobic moving bed biofilm reactors[J]. Water Research, 2019, 163: 114851.
30	HE Zhangwei, ZOU Zhengshuo, SUN Qian, et al. Freezing-low temperature treatment facilitates short-chain fatty acids production from waste activated sludge with short-term fermentation[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2022, 347: 126337.
31	LIU Xuyan, YANG Hong, FANG Xiaoyue, et al. Comparative study on the performance of hydrolytic acidification immobilized filler and sludge in the pretreatment of municipal wastewater[J]. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 2021, 24: 101885.
32	LIU Xiang, CHEN Qiuwen, ZHU Liang. Improving biodegradation potential of domestic wastewater by manipulating the size distribution of organic matter[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2016, 47: 174-182.
33	HSU Chang S, HENDRICKSON Christopher L, RODGERS Ryan P, et al. Petroleomics: Advanced molecular probe for petroleum heavy ends[J]. Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 2011, 46(4): 337-343.
34	MA Xiaoke, LIU Bing, MA Tianxiang, et al. Characterization of petroleum sulfonate synthesized via gas-phase SO₃ sulfonation in rotating packed bed and its application in enhanced oil recovery[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2021, 230: 116216.
35	KIM Ji Young, Seung Han WOO, LEE Min Woo, et al. Sequential treatment of PTA wastewater in a two-stage UASB process: Focusing on p-toluate degradation and microbial distribution[J]. Water Research, 2012, 46(8): 2805-2814.
36	XIE Xuehui, LIU Na, YANG Bo, et al. Comparison of microbial community in hydrolysis acidification reactor depending on different structure dyes by Illumina MiSeq sequencing[J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2016, 111: 14-21.
37	Juan LYU, WANG Yan, FU Mengya, et al. Removal of tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) from thin-film transistor liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) industry wastewater by hydrolysis acidification-aerobic and anaerobic processes[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 279: 123502.
38	Hang T DAM, VOLLMERS John, SOBOL Morgan S, et al. Targeted cell sorting combined with single cell genomics captures low abundant microbial dark matter with higher sensitivity than metagenomics[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2020, 11: 1377.
39	GENDERJAHN Steffi, ALAWI Mashal, MANGELSDORF Kai, et al. Desiccation- and saline-tolerant bacteria and Archaea in kalahari pan sediments[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2018, 9: 2082.
40	WASI Samina, TABREZ Shams, AHMAD Masood. Use of Pseudomonas spp. for the bioremediation of environmental pollutants: A review[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2013, 185: 8147-8155.
41	FARAG Soha, SOLIMAN Nadia A, ABDEL-FATTAH Yasser R. Statistical optimization of crude oil bio-degradation by a local marine bacterium isolate Pseudomonas sp. sp48[J]. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 2018, 16(2): 409-420.
42	Patricia BOVIO-WINKLER, CABEZAS Angela, ETCHEBEHERE Claudia. Database mining to unravel the ecology of the phylum Chloroflexi in methanogenic full scale bioreactors[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2021, 11: 603234.
43	邓芷妮. 水解酸化-SBR-芬顿工艺处理污泥热水解脱水滤液的效能研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2021.
	DENG Zhini. Study on the efficiency of hydrolytic acidification-SBR-Fenton process in treating sludge hot water dehydration filtrate[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2021.
44	GENG Shuying, FU Weizhang, CHEN Weifeng, et al. Effects of an external magnetic field on microbial functional genes and metabolism of activated sludge based on metagenomic sequencing[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10: 8818.
45	TOLEDO M, GUTIÉRREZ M C, SILES J A, et al. Chemometric analysis and NIR spectroscopy to evaluate odorous impact during the composting of different raw materials[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 167: 154-162.
46	WEI Huawei, WANG Liuhong, HASSAN Muhammad, et al. Succession of the functional microbial communities and the metabolic functions in maize straw composting process[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 256: 333-341.
47	RHYS-WILLIAMS W, TAYLOR S C, WILLIAMS P A. A novel pathway for the catabolism of 4-nitrotoluene by Pseudomonas [J]. Journal of General Microbiology, 1993, 139(9): 1967-1972.
48	MOONEY Aisling, WARD Patrick G, O'CONNOR Kevin E. Microbial degradation of styrene: Biochemistry, molecular genetics, and perspectives for biotechnological applications[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2006, 72(1): 1-10.
49	CAO Bin, NAGARAJAN Karthiga, Kai-Chee LOH. Biodegradation of aromatic compounds: Current status and opportunities for biomolecular approaches[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2009, 85(2): 207-228.

[1]	王娟, 卞春林, 陈翔宇, 王莹, 王新东, 左彦鑫, 肖本益. 微好氧厌氧消化研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(7): 4005-4014.
[2]	海岩, 周鑫, 李艳. 单级固定床生物膜反应器主流厌氧氨氧化快速启动性能[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(4): 2201-2209.
[3]	赵瑞强, 周鑫, 牛冰心. 废水处理硝酸盐异化还原与厌氧氨氧化/反硝化耦合工艺构建[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(3): 1593-1605.
[4]	杨杰源, 朱易春, 赖雅芬, 张超, 田帅, 谢颖. 低强度超声波对高负荷厌氧氨氧化EGSB反应器运行性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(2): 1098-1108.
[5]	王雪婷, 顾霞, 徐先宝, 赵磊, 薛罡, 李响. 水热预处理对餐厨垃圾厌氧发酵产戊酸的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4994-5002.
[6]	陈翔宇, 卞春林, 肖本益. 温度分级厌氧消化工艺的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4872-4881.
[7]	史天茜, 石永辉, 武新颖, 张益豪, 秦哲, 赵春霞, 路达. Fe²⁺对厌氧氨氧化EGSB反应器运行性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 5003-5010.
[8]	奚永兰, 王成成, 叶小梅, 刘洋, 贾昭炎, 曹春晖, 韩挺, 张应鹏, 田雨. 微纳米气泡在厌氧消化中的应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4414-4423.
[9]	刘洋, 叶小梅, 苗晓, 王成成, 贾昭炎, 曹春晖, 奚永兰. 农村有机生活垃圾干发酵氨胁迫下中试工艺[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3847-3854.
[10]	李白雪, 信欣, 朱羽蒙, 刘琴, 刘鑫. SASD-A体系构建及进水不同S/N对脱氮工艺的影响机制[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3261-3271.
[11]	庄捷, 薛锦辉, 赵斌成, 张文艺. 猪粪厌氧消化进程中重金属与腐殖质的有机结合机制[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3281-3291.
[12]	黄越, 赵立欣, 姚宗路, 于佳动, 李再兴, 申瑞霞, 安柯萌, 黄亚丽. 木质纤维类废弃物定向生物转化乳酸、乙酸研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2691-2701.
[13]	李华华, 李逸航, 金北辰, 李隆昕, 成少安. 厌氧氨氧化-生物电化学耦合废水处理系统的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2678-2690.
[14]	范思涵, 于国熙, 来超超, 何欢, 黄斌, 潘学军. 非生物改性对厌氧微生物产物光化学活性影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 2180-2189.
[15]	王玉, 余广炜, 江汝清, 黎长江, 林佳佳, 邢贞娇. 餐厨厌氧沼渣生物炭吸附盐酸环丙沙星[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 2160-2170.

炼化污水中低温水解酸化性能及微生物特性对比

Comparison of hydrolysis and acidification performance and microbial characteristics of refinery wastewater at mesophilic and psychrophilic temperatures

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 49

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价