响应面法优化Mn-Ce/HZSM-5催化氧化三氯乙烯

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-0089

化工进展 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 5830-5842.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-0089

响应面法优化Mn-Ce/HZSM-5催化氧化三氯乙烯

常甜¹^,²^,³^,⁴(), 王宇¹, 赵作桐¹, 胡锦超¹, 沈振兴²()

^1.陕西科技大学环境科学与工程学院，陕西西安 710021
^2.西安交通大学能源与动力工程学院，陕西西安 710049
^3.省部共建煤炭高效利用与绿色化工国家重点实验室（宁夏大学），宁夏银川 750021
^4.中国科学院地球环境研究所黄土与第四纪地质国家重点实验室，陕西西安 710049

收稿日期:2022-01-12 修回日期:2022-05-20 出版日期:2022-11-25 发布日期:2022-11-28
通讯作者: 沈振兴
作者简介:常甜（1988—），女，副教授，硕士生导师，研究方向为大气挥发性有机物监测与控制。E-mail：changtian@sust.edu.cn。
基金资助:
省部共建煤炭高效利用与绿色化工国家重点实验室开放课题(2022-K45);中国科学院地球环境研究所黄土与第四纪地质国家重点实验室开放课题(SKLLQG2129);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(2022JQ-101)

Optimization of catalytic oxidation of trichloroethylene over Mn-Ce/HZSM-5 using response surface methodology

CHANG Tian¹^,²^,³^,⁴(), WANG Yu¹, ZHAO Zuotong¹, HU Jinchao¹, SHEN Zhenxing²()

^1.School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, Xi’an 710021, Shaanxi, China
^2.School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, Shaanxi, China
^3.State Key Laboratory of High-efficiency Utilization of Coal and Green Chemical Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, China
^4.State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, CAS, Xi’an 710049, Shaanxi, China

Received:2022-01-12 Revised:2022-05-20 Online:2022-11-25 Published:2022-11-28
Contact: SHEN Zhenxing

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

三氯乙烯（TCE）是用途广泛的工业原料，其排放严重威胁着生态环境和人体健康。如何高效去除TCE成为亟待解决的关键问题。本文采用沉积-沉淀法制备了一系列不同Ce/Mn摩尔比的Mn-Ce/HZSM-5催化剂，用于催化去除TCE，并用响应面分析的方法探究不同因素对TCE催化氧化过程的影响。结果表明：Mn-Ce/HZSM-5催化剂对TCE有较好的催化活性，当Ce/Mn摩尔比为0.8时催化活性最高，主要归因于该催化剂较高的还原性和丰富的表面氧物种。另外，响应面分析结果表明：在MnCe_0.8/HZSM-5催化氧化TCE过程中，温度是影响TCE去除率和CO₂选择性的最关键因素，其次是流量和相对湿度（RH）。当气体流量为0.2L/min、温度为450℃、RH为16%时，最优TCE去除率为77.1%，CO₂选择性为70.0%，且MnCe_0.8/HZSM-5催化剂表现出较好的稳定性。研究结果为含氯挥发性有机物的去除提供了一种有效方法。

关键词: Mn-Ce/HZSM-5催化剂, 三氯乙烯, 活性, 响应面法, 优化

Abstract:

Trichloroethylene (TCE) is a widely used industrial raw material, but its emission seriously threatens the ecological environment and human health. How to efficiently remove TCE is still a crucial issue to be solved urgently. In this study, a series of Mn-Ce/HZSM-5 catalysts with different molar ratios of Ce/Mn were prepared by a deposition-precipitation method, and then used for the catalytic oxidation of TCE. The effects of various process parameters on the catalytic performance of the TCE decomposition were investigated using response surface methodology (RSM). The Mn-Ce/HZSM-5 catalyst demonstrated good catalytic activity for TCE decomposition, and MnCe_0.8/HZSM-5 catalyst exhibited the highest catalytic activity due to its high reducibility and abundant surface oxygen species. In addition, the RSM analysis results showed that temperature was the most significant factor affecting the TCE removal efficiency and CO₂ selectivity, followed by the gas flow rate and relative humidity (RH) in catalytic oxidation of TCE by MnCe_0.8/HZSM-5. The best TCE removal efficiency (77.1%) and CO₂ selectivity (70.0%) were acquired at a gas flow rate of 0.2L/min, temperature of 450℃ and RH of 16%. Moreover, the MnCe_0.8/HZSM-5 catalyst also showed good stability. The results provided an effective method for the removal of chlorinated volatile organic compounds.

Key words: Mn-Ce/HZSM-5 catalyst, trichloroethylene, reactivity, response surface methodology, optimization

中图分类号:

常甜, 王宇, 赵作桐, 胡锦超, 沈振兴. 响应面法优化Mn-Ce/HZSM-5催化氧化三氯乙烯[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(11): 5830-5842.

CHANG Tian, WANG Yu, ZHAO Zuotong, HU Jinchao, SHEN Zhenxing. Optimization of catalytic oxidation of trichloroethylene over Mn-Ce/HZSM-5 using response surface methodology[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(11): 5830-5842.

图/表 17

参考文献 44

1	BAHRAMI H, ESLAMI A, NABIZADEH R, et al. Degradation of trichloroethylene by sonophotolytic-activated persulfate processes: optimization using response surface methodology[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 198: 1210-1218.
2	雷丽丹, 周正伟, 高雅, 等. 电化学氧化改性石墨毡电芬顿体系对三氯乙烯的降解研究[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2021, 28(3): 108-116.
	LEI Lidan, ZHOU Zhengwei, GAO Ya, et al. TCE treatment in electro-Fenton system with electrochemical oxidation modified graphite felt electrode[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2021, 28(3): 108-116.
3	BLANCH-RAGA N, PALOMARES A E, MARTÍNEZ-TRIGUERO J, et al. Cu and Co modified beta zeolite catalysts for the trichloroethylene oxidation[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2016, 187(15): 90-97.
4	王曼凝, 颜廷春, 耿炎, 等. 磁场-真菌生物滴滤器去除三氯乙烯废气的研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(5): 172-181.
	WANG Manning, YAN Tingchun, GENG Yan, et al. Removal of trichloroethylene by a magnetic field-fungal biotrickling filter[J]. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 43(5): 172-181.
5	陈立, 刘霄龙, 施文博, 等. 氯代挥发性有机物CVOCs催化氧化的研究进展[J]. 环境工程, 2017, 35(10): 114-119.
	CHEN Li, LIU Xiaolong, SHI Wenbo, et al. Research progress of catalytic oxidation of CVOCs[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2017, 35(10): 114-119.
6	DIVAKAR Duraiswami, Manuel ROMERO-SÁEZ, Beñat PEREDA-AYO, et al. Catalytic oxidation of trichloroethylene over Fe-zeolites[J]. Catalysis Today, 2011, 176(1): 357-360.
7	梁川, 朱磊, 于鹏, 等. 负载型复合氧化物催化剂催化燃烧氯苯性能研究[J]. 功能材料, 2021, 52(5): 5012-5017.
	LIANG Chuan, ZHU Lei, YU Peng, et al. Performance study on the catalytic combustion of chlorobenzene by supported composite oxide catalysts[J]. Journal of Functional Materials, 2021, 52(5): 5012-5017.
8	SUN W, GONG B, PAN J, et al. Catalytic combustion of CVOCs over Cr _x Ti_1- _x oxide catalysts[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2020, 391: 132-144.
9	方志勇, 王英普, 张帅, 等. 含氯挥发性有机物催化燃烧研究进展[J]. 工业催化, 2021, 29(5): 10-18.
	FANG Zhiyong, WANG Yingpu, ZHANG Shuai, et al. Research advancements on catalytic combustion of chlorinated volatile organic compounds[J]. Industrial Catalysis, 2021, 29(5): 10-18.
10	孙静, 董一霖, 李法齐, 等. Co₃O₄改性USY分子筛吸附和催化氧化甲苯特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(6): 3306-3315.
	SUN Jing, DONG Yilin, LI Faqi, et al. Study on adsorption and catalytic oxidation characteristics of toluene on Co₃O₄ modified USY molecular sieve[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(6): 3306-3315.
11	冯爱虎, 于洋, 于云, 等. 沸石分子筛及其负载型催化剂去除VOCs研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2018, 76(10): 757-773.
	FENG Aihu, YU Yang, YU Yun, et al. Recent progress in the removal of volatile organic compounds by zeolite and its supported catalysts[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2018, 76(10): 757-773.
12	宇富航, 李永红, 鲁倩文, 等. 以CoMn₂O₄为催化剂氧化二甲苯的研究[J]. 化学工业与工程, 2021, 38(4): 25-36.
	YU Fuhang, LI Yonghong, LU Qianwen, et al. Study on the oxidation of xylene with CoMn₂O₄ as catalyst[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering, 2021, 38(4): 25-36.
13	王玉亭, 任凯, 沈伯雄, 等. 燃煤烟气条件下锰铈基催化剂对邻二甲苯催化氧化[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(8): 3102-3109.
	WANG Yuting, REN Kai, SHEN Boxiong, et al. MnCe based catalyst for o-xylene catalytic oxidation from coal-combustion flue gas[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(8): 3102-3109.
14	张烁, 吴卫红, 杨洋, 等. 老化对钴铈基催化剂催化氧化丙烷的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(2): 614-621.
	ZHANG Shuo, WU Weihong, YANG Yang, et al. Effect of aging on propane catalytic oxidation over Co-Ce catalyst[J]. China Environmental Science, 2021, 41(2): 614-621.
15	李梦翔, 周月, 刘明庆, 等. 沸石分子筛材料去除CVOCs的研究进展[J]. 现代化工, 2021, 41(5): 59-63.
	LI Mengxiang, ZHOU Yue, LIU Mingqing, et al. Research progress in removing CVOCs by zeolite molecular sieve[J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2021, 41(5): 59-63.
16	ZHAO H, DONG F, HAN W, et al. Study of morphology-dependent and crystal-plane effects of CeMnO _x catalysts for 1,2-dichlorobenzene catalytic elimination[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(39): 18055-18064.
17	YANG S, ZHAO H, DONG F, et al. Highly efficient catalytic combustion of o-dichlorobenzene over three-dimensional ordered mesoporous cerium manganese bimetallic oxides: a new concept of chlorine removal mechanism[J]. Molecular Catalysis, 2019, 463: 119-129.
18	CHEN J, CHEN X, YAN D, et al. A facile strategy of enhancing interaction between cerium and manganese oxides for catalytic removal of gaseous organic contaminants[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2019, 250: 396-407.
19	徐源, 石瑞琦, 黄大俊, 等. 响应面法优化Co₃O₄制备及其光催化性能[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学), 2021, 35(5): 74-79.
	XU Yuan, SHI Ruiqi, HUANG Dajun, et al. Optimization of Co₃O₄ preparation and photocatalytic properties by response surface method[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (Natural Science), 2021, 35(5): 74-79.
20	彭旭, 陈际雨. 催化燃烧处理环己酮废气的响应面法优化[J]. 浙江化工, 2018, 49(4): 38-43.
	PENG Xu, CHEN Jiyu. Process optimization of cyclohexanone waste gas by catalytic combustion based on response surface method[J]. Zhejiang Chemical Industry, 2018, 49(4): 38-43.
21	李钰琦, 王黎, 鲁逸飞, 等. 响应面法优化超临界Ir-Ta/Ti催化氧化处理焦化废水[J]. 现代化工, 2020, 40(5): 165-169, 175.
	LI Yuqi, WANG Li, LU Yifei, et al. Optimization of Ir-Ta/Ti catalytic oxidation of coking wastewater in supercritical reaction by response surface methodology[J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2020, 40(5): 165-169, 175.
22	马越, 霍晓东, 陶炜, 等. 基于铜基催化剂的苯催化氧化实验研究[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2019, 25(2): 154-160.
	MA Yue, HUO Xiaodong, TAO Wei, et al. Experimental study on the catalytic oxidation of benzene compounds based on Cu-based catalysts[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2019, 25(2): 154-160.
23	YANG J, YE Z, WANG G, et al. Neuro-genetic machine learning framework accelerates the optimization of Ag/MnO _x catalyst for total oxidation of toluene[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2021, 622: 118221.
24	CHEN J, CHEN X, CHEN X, et al. Homogeneous introduction of CeO _y into MnO _x -based catalyst for oxidation of aromatic VOCs[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2018, 224: 825-835.
25	DU J, QU Z, DING C, et al. Low-temperature abatement of toluene over Mn-Ce oxides catalysts synthesized by a modified hydrothermal approach[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2018, 433: 1025-1035.
26	LIN X, LI S, HE H, et al. Evolution of oxygen vacancies in MnO _x -CeO₂ mixed oxides for soot oxidation[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2018, 223: 91-102.
27	DONG Yuming, LI Kun, JIANG Pingping, et al. Simple hydrothermal preparation of α-, β-, and γ-MnO₂ and phase sensitivity in catalytic ozonation[J]. RSC Advances, 2014, 4(74): 39167-39173.
28	LIU G, YUE R, JIA Y, et al. Catalytic oxidation of benzene over Ce-Mn oxides synthesized by flame spray pyrolysis[J]. Particuology, 2013, 11(4): 454-459.
29	HAN Yifan, CHEN Fengxi, ZHONG Ziyi, et al. Controlled synthesis, characterization, and catalytic properties of Mn₂O₃ and Mn₃O₄ nanoparticles supported on mesoporous silica SBA-15[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2006, 110(48): 24450-24456.
30	KUMAR P, KUMAR P, KUMAR A, et al. Structural, morphological, electrical and dielectric properties of Mn doped CeO₂ [J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2016, 672: 543-548.
31	CHANG Tian, CHEN Qingcai, FAN Hao, et al. Removal mechanism and quantitative control of trichloroethylene in a post-plasma-catalytic system over Mn-Ce/HZSM-5 catalysts[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2021, 11(11): 3746-3761.
32	WENG X, LONG Y, WANG W, et al. Structural effect and reaction mechanism of MnO₂ catalysts in the catalytic oxidation of chlorinated aromatics[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2019, 40(5): 638-646.
33	SEONG G, DEJHOSSEINI M, ADSCHIRI T. A kinetic study of catalytic hydrothermal reactions of acetaldehyde with cubic CeO₂ nanoparticles[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2018, 550: 284-296.
34	MAY Y, WANG W, HAN Y, et al. Insights into facet-dependent reactivity of Cu-CeO₂ nanocubes and nanorods as catalysts for CO oxidation reaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2020, 41(6): 1017-1027.
35	RONG S, ZHANG P, LIU F, et al. Engineering crystal facet of α-MnO₂ nanowire for highly efficient catalytic oxidation of carcinogenic airborne formaldehyde[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2018, 8(4): 3435-3446.
36	WANG Y, DENG W, WANG Y, et al. A comparative study of the catalytic oxidation of chlorobenzene and toluene over Ce-Mn oxides[J]. Molecular Catalysis, 2018, 459: 61-70.
37	刘森, 黄锐, 孙培永, 等. Mn/Ti-Zr复合氧化物催化苯甲酸甲酯选择性加氢[J]. 精细化工, 2021, 38(4): 782-789.
	LIU Sen, HUANG Rui, SUN Peiyong, et al. Selective hydrogenation of methyl benzoate catalyzed by Mn/Ti-Zr mixed oxides[J]. Fine Chemicals, 2021, 38(4): 782-789.
38	凌昊, 孟捷, 陶进国, 等. Ce-ZnO/AC在真空紫外下催化降解对二甲苯废气[J]. 环境工程学报, 2020, 14(11): 3092-3101.
	LING Hao, MENG Jie, TAO Jinguo, et al. Catalytic degradation of p-xylene waste gas by Ce-ZnO/AC under vacuum ultraviolet irradiation[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2020, 14(11): 3092-3101.
39	WANG Jinlong, ZHANG Pengyi, LI Jinge, et al. Room-temperature oxidation of formaldehyde by layered manganese oxide: effect of water[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(20): 12372-12379.
40	吴彦丽, 王慧, 吴少华, 等. 低温催化氧化氯苯类有机物的催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工新型材料, 2021, 49(1): 243-246.
	WU Yanli, WANG Hui, WU Shaohua, et al. Research progress on catalyst for low-temperature oxidation of chlorobenzene[J]. New Chemical Materials, 2021, 49(1): 243-246.
41	殷珂, 陈瑞洋, 刘志明. 锰基氧化物上甲苯催化氧化的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(23): 23051-23056.
	YIN Ke, CHEN Ruiyang, LIU Zhiming. Catalytic removal of toluene over manganese-based oxide catalysts[J]. Materials Reports, 2020, 34(23): 23051-23056.
42	李树娜, 宋佩, 张金丽, 等. CeO₂-MnO _x 催化剂形貌对低浓度甲烷催化燃烧反应性能的影响[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2018, 46(5): 615-624.
	LI Shuna, SONG Pei, ZHANG Jinli, et al. Morphological effect of CeO₂-MnO _x catalyst on their catalytic performance in lean methane combustion[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2018, 46(5): 615-624.
43	彭超, 于迪, 王斓懿, 等. 铈基氧化物催化燃烧柴油机炭烟颗粒的性能及机理研究进展[J]. 中国科学: 化学, 2021, 51(8): 1029-1059.
	PENG Chao, YU Di, WANG Lanyi, et al. Recent advances in performances and mechanisms of cerium-based oxide catalysts for catalytic combustion of soot particles released from diesel engines[J]. Scientia Sinica Chimica), 2021, 51(8): 1029-1059.
44	权燕红, 苗超, 李涛, 等. 不同制备方法对氧化铈结构及甲苯催化燃烧性能的影响[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2021, 49(2): 211-219.
	QUAN Yanhong, MIAO Chao, LI Tao, et al. Effect of preparation methods on the structure and catalytic performance of CeO₂ for toluene combustion[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2021, 49(2): 211-219.

自变量	因素	水平
自变量	因素	-2	-1	0	1	2
X₁	温度/℃	350	375	400	425	450
X₂	气体流量/L·min^-1	0.2	0.4	0.6	0.8	1
X₃	RH/%	0	10	20	30	40

自变量	因素	水平
自变量	因素	-2	-1	0	1	2
X₁	温度/℃	350	375	400	425	450
X₂	气体流量/L·min^-1	0.2	0.4	0.6	0.8	1
X₃	RH/%	0	10	20	30	40

催化剂	原子比Ce/Mn^①	BET/m²·g^-1	总孔容/cm³·g^-1	平均孔径/nm
HZSM-5	—	410.40	0.20	2.05
MnO _x /HZSM-5	—	252.50	0.26	4.20
MnCe_0.4O _x /HZSM-5	0.39	237.56	0.25	3.38
MnCe_0.8O _x /HZSM-5	0.81	232.50	0.23	3.34
MnCe_1.2O _x /HZSM-5	1.18	211.66	0.19	3.24
CeO₂/HZSM-5	—	243.72	0.23	3.36

催化剂	原子比Ce/Mn^①	BET/m²·g^-1	总孔容/cm³·g^-1	平均孔径/nm
HZSM-5	—	410.40	0.20	2.05
MnO _x /HZSM-5	—	252.50	0.26	4.20
MnCe_0.4O _x /HZSM-5	0.39	237.56	0.25	3.38
MnCe_0.8O _x /HZSM-5	0.81	232.50	0.23	3.34
MnCe_1.2O _x /HZSM-5	1.18	211.66	0.19	3.24
CeO₂/HZSM-5	—	243.72	0.23	3.36

催化剂	Mn⁴⁺/Mn	Mn³⁺/Mn	Ce³⁺/Ce⁴⁺	O_a/O_l
Mn/HZSM-5	0.24	0.48	—	3.4
MnCe_0.4/HZSM-5	0.18	0.44	0.16	3.43
MnCe_0.8/HZSM-5	0.20	0.51	0.21	3.78
MnCe_1.2/HZSM-5	0.17	0.43	0.12	2.86
Ce/HZSM-5	—	—	0.11	3.37

响应面法优化Mn-Ce/HZSM-5催化氧化三氯乙烯

Optimization of catalytic oxidation of trichloroethylene over Mn-Ce/HZSM-5 using response surface methodology

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 17

参考文献 44

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

试验	自变量（X）			响应值（Y）
试验	温度（X₁）/°C	气体流量（X₂）/L·min^-1	RH（X₃）/%	TCE去除率（Y₁）/%	CO₂选择性（Y₂）/%
1	425	0.8	10	56.76	47.39
2	400	0.6	0	43.13	31.69
3	400	0.2	20	55.27	48.19
4	425	0.4	10	61.84	52.87
5	375	0.4	10	40.37	33.92
6	425	0.4	30	57.61	49.42
7	400	0.6	20	48.68	40.68
8	350	0.6	20	27.61	24.29
9	400	0.6	40	32.83	29.15
10	375	0.8	30	28.4	24.4
11	400	0.6	20	48.77	40.78
12	400	1	20	35.63	29.98
13	450	0.6	20	72.48	65.7
14	400	0.6	20	47.12	39.38
15	425	0.8	30	51.26	44.22
16	375	0.8	10	33.43	26.17
17	375	0.4	30	36.94	31.91
18	400	0.6	20	47.43	39.52
19	400	0.6	20	47.35	39.61
20	400	0.6	20	47.62	40.62

来源	平方和	自由度	均方	F值	p值	显著性
合计	2547.81	19
模型	2534.11	9	281.57	205.50	< 0.0001	显著
X₁	1981.81	1	1981.81	1446.38	< 0.0001	显著
X₂	273.82	1	273.82	199.84	< 0.0001	显著
X₃	94.04	1	94.04	68.63	< 0.0001	显著
X₁X₂	2.05	1	2.05	1.50	0.2493	不显著
X₁X₃	0.20	1	0.20	0.15	0.7093	不显著
X₂X₃	1.03	1	1.03	0.75	0.4063	不显著
X₁²	9.04	1	9.04	6.60	0.0280	显著
X₂²	7.58	1	7.58	5.53	0.0405	显著
X₃²	146.83	1	146.83	107.16	< 0.0001	显著
残差	13.70	10	1.37
失拟项	11.16	5	2.23	4.38	0.0653	不显著
纯误差	2.54	5	0.51

来源	平方和	自由度	均方	F值	p值	显著性
合计	2107.39	19
模型	2094.74	9	232.75	184.00	< 0.0001	显著
X₁	1606.41	1	1606.41	1269.94	< 0.0001	显著
X₂	243.05	1	243.05	192.14	< 0.0001	显著
X₃	14.98	1	14.98	11.84	0.0063	显著
X₁X₂	2.62	1	2.62	2.07	0.1805	不显著
X₁X₃	1.01	1	1.01	0.80	0.3930	不显著
X₂X₃	0.03	1	0.03	0.03	0.8734	不显著
X₁²	38.45	1	38.45	30.40	0.0003	显著
X₂²	1.46	1	1.46	1.15	0.3082	不显著
X₃²	145.67	1	145.67	115.16	< 0.0001	显著
残差	12.65	10	1.26
失拟项	10.49	5	2.10	4.85	0.0541	不显著
纯误差	2.16	5	0.43

[1]	时永兴, 林刚, 孙晓航, 蒋韦庚, 乔大伟, 颜彬航. 二氧化碳加氢制甲醇过程中铜基催化剂活性位点研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 287-298.
[2]	王正坤, 黎四芳. 双子表面活性剂癸炔二醇的绿色合成[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 400-410.
[3]	高雨飞, 鲁金凤. 非均相催化臭氧氧化作用机理研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 430-438.
[4]	王乐乐, 杨万荣, 姚燕, 刘涛, 何川, 刘逍, 苏胜, 孔凡海, 朱仓海, 向军. SCR脱硝催化剂掺废特性及性能影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 489-497.
[5]	赵景超, 谭明. 表面活性剂对电渗析减量化工业含盐废水的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 529-535.
[6]	孙玉玉, 蔡鑫磊, 汤吉海, 黄晶晶, 黄益平, 刘杰. 反应精馏合成甲基丙烯酸甲酯工艺优化及节能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 56-63.
[7]	李梦圆, 郭凡, 李群生. 聚乙烯醇生产中回收工段第三、第四精馏塔的模拟与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 113-123.
[8]	张瑞杰, 刘志林, 王俊文, 张玮, 韩德求, 李婷, 邹雄. 水冷式复叠制冷系统的在线动态模拟与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 124-132.
[9]	王福安. 300kt/a环氧丙烷工艺反应器降耗减排分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 213-218.
[10]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[11]	李春利, 韩晓光, 刘加朋, 王亚涛, 王晨希, 王洪海, 彭胜. 填料塔液体分布器的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4479-4495.
[12]	刘炫麟, 王驿凯, 戴苏洲, 殷勇高. 热泵中氨基甲酸铵分解反应特性及反应器结构优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4522-4530.
[13]	王谨航, 何勇, 史伶俐, 龙臻, 梁德青. 气体水合物阻聚剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4587-4602.
[14]	林晓鹏, 肖友华, 管奕琛, 鲁晓东, 宗文杰, 傅深渊. 离子聚合物-金属复合材料（IPMC）柔性电极的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4770-4782.
[15]	王晨, 白浩良, 康雪. 大功率UV-LED散热与纳米TiO₂光催化酸性红26耦合系统性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4905-4916.