响应曲面法复配混凝剂处理海上生产返排液

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-2170

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

将聚硅酸铝铁（PASF）、聚丙烯酰胺（PAM）、纳米零价铁（nZVI）以及活性炭等材料复配制备复合混凝剂。在单因素实验基础上，以处理后海上生产返排液水质浊度和化学需氧量（COD）含量为评价指标，探究m(PSAF)/m(PAM)、复配温度以及复配熟化时间对复合混凝剂制备的影响。采用Box-Behnken响应曲面法，以COD含量为响应值建立数学模型，优化复配制备工艺参数，结果表明：数学模型显著，拟合度良好，可以用来分析及预测复合混凝剂的性能；最佳工艺参数为m(PSAF)/m(PAM)=14.63、复配温度=70℃和复配熟化时间=3.02h；验证结果COD含量为756.54mg/L，实验值与预测值偏差仅为2.14%。现场实验表明该复合混凝剂可以将海上生产返排液水质浊度、COD含量、含油量以及氨氮含量分别降低96.74%、94.35%、75.77%和74.27%，达到了进入生化处理系统的要求。

关键词: 数学模拟, 优化, 混凝, 化学需氧量, 浊度

Abstract:

The composite flocculant was prepared by compounding polysilicate aluminum iron, polyacrylamide, nano zero valent iron and activated carbon. On the basis of single factor experiment, the influences of m(PSAF)/m(PAM), compound temperature and compound curing time on the preparation of composite flocculant were investigated with turbidity and COD of treated effluent as evaluation indexes. Box Behnken response surface methodology was used to establish a mathematical model with COD content as the response value to optimize the preparation parameters. The results showed that the mathematical model was significant and the fitting degree was good, which could be used to analyze and predict the performance of the composite flocculant. The optimal process parameters were m(PSAF)/m(PAM)=14.63, compound temperature=70℃ and compound curing time =3.02h. The COD content was 756.54mg/L The deviation between the experimental value and the predicted value was 2.14%. Field experiments show that the composite flocculant can reduce turbidity, COD, oil content and ammonia nitrogen content by 96.74%, 94.35%, 75.77% and 74.27% respectively, meeting the requirements of entering the biochemical treatment system.

Key words: mathematical modeling, optimization, coagulation, COD, turbidity

中图分类号:

O652.6

贺远鹏. 响应曲面法复配混凝剂处理海上生产返排液[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S1): 439-445.

HE Yuanpeng. Treatment of offshore production flowback fluid with composite flocculant by response surface methodology[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(S1): 439-445.

图/表 13

参考文献 16

1	刘义刚, 黄利平, 黄波, 等. 海上油田酸化返排液处理技术[J]. 精细与专用化学品, 2020, 28(1): 25-29.
	LIU Yigang, HUANG Liping, HUANG Bo, et al. Treatment technology of acidizing flowback fluid in offshore oilfield[J]. Fine and Specialty Chemicals, 2020, 28(1): 25-29.
2	孟祥海, 黄利平, 黄波, 等. 渤海油田油井酸化返排液特征及处理工艺研究[J]. 油气田地面工程, 2020, 39(4): 25-30.
	MENG Xianghai, HUANG Liping, HUANG Bo, et al. Characteristics and treatment technology of acidizing flowback fluid in Bohai Oilfield[J]. Oil and Gas Field Surface Engineering, 2020, 39(4): 25-30.
3	谭振兴. 油田返排液处理技术研究与应用[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2019, 39(13): 205-206.
	TAN Zhenxing. Research and application of oilfield flowback fluid treatment technology[J]. Standards and quality of China Petroleum and Chemical Industry, 2019, 39(13): 205-206.
4	张颖苹. GD油田含聚含油污水复配絮凝剂体系实验研究[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2016, 29(1): 63-66.
	ZHANG Yinping. Experimental study on complex flocculant system of polymer and oily water in GD Oilfield[J]. Journal of Petrochemical University, 2016, 29(1): 63-66.
5	杨开吉, 姚春丽. 高分子复合絮凝剂作用机理及在废水处理中应用的研究进展[J]. 中国造纸, 2019, 38(12): 65-71.
	YANG Kaiji, YAO Chunli. Research Progress on Mechanism of polymer composite flocculant and its application in wastewater treatment[J]. China Paper, 2019, 38(12): 65-71.
6	赵诗雨, 孙连军, 付道松, 等. 复合高分子絮凝剂的研究与应用进展[J]. 化肥设计, 2018, 56(6): 1-4.
	ZHAO Shiyu, SUN Lianjun, FU Daosong, et al. Research and application progress of composite polymer flocculant[J]. Chemical Fertilizer Design, 2018, 56(6): 1-4.
7	中国石油天然气总公司,中华人民共和国石油天然气行业标准.絮凝剂评定方法: [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社,1993.
	China National Petroleum Corporation, petroleum and natural gas industry standard of the people’s Republic of China. Evaluation method of flocculant: [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 1993.
8	宋伟龙, 戴友芝, 唐彬, 等. Box-Behnken响应曲面法优化高聚复配絮凝剂制备条件[J]. 环境工程学报, 2014, 8(7): 2753-2759.
	SONG Weilong, DAI Youzhi, TANG Bin, et al. Optimization of preparation conditions of high polymer composite flocculant by box Behnken response surface methodology[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2014, 8(7): 2753-2759.
9	陈斌, 周冰. 采用正交实验法进行复配絮凝剂去除采油废水中的污油实验的研究[J]. 山东化工, 2020, 49(1): 230-231.
	CHEN Bin, ZHOU Bing. The orthogonal experiment was used to study the removal of waste oil from oil production wastewater by compound flocculant[J]. Shandong Chemical Industry, 2020, 49(1): 230-231.
10	祁风琴, 邓辉. 研究PAFC与CPAM复配絮凝剂对城市生活污水中COD的处理效果[J]. 当代化工研究, 2019(2): 13-14.
	QI Fengqin, DENG Hui. The treatment effect of PAFC and CPAM composite flocculant on COD in urban domestic sewage was studied[J]. Research on Modern Chemical Industry, 2019(2): 13-14.
11	王刚, 王馨, 宋小三, 等. 响应曲面法中BBD和CCD在优化巯基乙酰化壳聚糖制备条件中的比较[J]. 环境工程学报, 2018, 12(9): 2502-2511.
	WANG Gang, WANG Xin, SONG Xiaosan, et al. Comparison of BBD and CCD in optimization of preparation conditions of mercaptoacetylated chitosan by response surface methodology[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2018, 12(9): 2502-2511.
12	冯维东. 响应曲面法优化复配絮凝中药水提液的研究[D]. 天津:天津科技大学, 2018.
	FENG Weidong. Optimization of water extract of compound flocculating Chinese medicine by response surface methodology[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University of Science and Technology, 2018.
13	王立果. 响应曲面法优化修饰型纳米零价铁去除地下水中的2,4-二氯苯酚[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学,2018.
	WANG Liguo. Optimization of removal of 2,4-dichlorophenol from groundwater by modified nano zero valent iron by response surface methodology[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2018.
14	蒋绍阶, 冯欣蕊, 李晓恩, 等. 响应面法优化制备PAC-PDMDAAC杂化絮凝剂及其表征[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(2): 731-736.
	JIANG Shaojie, FENG Xinrui, LI Xiao’en, et al. Preparation and characterization of PAC-PDMDAAC hybrid flocculant by response surface methodology[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(2): 731-736.
15	徐建平, 周润娟. 响应曲面法优化复合絮凝剂的制备工艺[J]. 环境工程学报, 2012, 6(9): 3063-3067.
	XU Jianping, ZHOU Runjuan. Optimization of preparation process of composite flocculant by response surface methodology[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2012, 6(9): 3063-3067.
16	邹明玲, 徐建平, 方进, 等. 响应曲面法优化复合混凝剂的制备条件[J]. 安徽工程大学学报, 2012, 27(1): 21-24.
	ZHOU Mingling, XU Jianping, FANG Jin, et al. Optimization of preparation conditions of composite flocculant by response surface methodology[J]. Journal of Anhui University of Technology, 2012, 27(1): 21-24.

因素	平方和	自由度	均方	F值	P值
模型	738847.72	9.00	82094.19	65.77	<0.0001
A［m(PSAF)/m(PAM)］	3160.13	1.00	3160.13	2.53	0.1556
B（复配温度）	51360.13	1.00	51360.13	41.15	0.0004
C（复配熟化时间）	19800.50	1.00	19800.50	15.86	0.0053
AB	1560.25	1.00	1560.25	1.25	0.3004
AC	1849.00	1.00	1849.00	1.48	0.2630
BC	2704.00	1.00	2704.00	2.17	0.1845
A2	318131.64	1.00	318131.64	254.89	<0.0001
B2	145.33	1.00	145.33	0.12	0.7429
C2	300445.33	1.00	300445.33	240.72	<0.0001
残差	8736.75	7.00	1248.11
失拟项	2470.75	3.00	823.58	13.45	0.0145
误差项	6266.00	4.00	1566.50
总计	747584.47	16.00

因素	平方和	自由度	均方	F值	P值
模型	738847.72	9.00	82094.19	65.77	<0.0001
A［m(PSAF)/m(PAM)］	3160.13	1.00	3160.13	2.53	0.1556
B（复配温度）	51360.13	1.00	51360.13	41.15	0.0004
C（复配熟化时间）	19800.50	1.00	19800.50	15.86	0.0053
AB	1560.25	1.00	1560.25	1.25	0.3004
AC	1849.00	1.00	1849.00	1.48	0.2630
BC	2704.00	1.00	2704.00	2.17	0.1845
A2	318131.64	1.00	318131.64	254.89	<0.0001
B2	145.33	1.00	145.33	0.12	0.7429
C2	300445.33	1.00	300445.33	240.72	<0.0001
残差	8736.75	7.00	1248.11
失拟项	2470.75	3.00	823.58	13.45	0.0145
误差项	6266.00	4.00	1566.50
总计	747584.47	16.00

项目	浊度	COD/mg · L^-1	含油量/mg · L^-1	氨氮/mg · L^-1
处理前	460	13380.65	125.65	20.6
处理后	35	854.34	30.45	5.3
降低率/%	92.39	93.62	75.77	74.27

项目	浊度	COD/mg · L^-1	含油量/mg · L^-1	氨氮/mg · L^-1
处理前	460	13380.65	125.65	20.6
处理后	35	854.34	30.45	5.3
降低率/%	92.39	93.62	75.77	74.27

[1]	王家庆, 宋广伟, 李强, 郭帅成, DAI Qingli. 橡胶混凝土界面改性方法及性能提升路径[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 328-343.
[2]	王正坤, 黎四芳. 双子表面活性剂癸炔二醇的绿色合成[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 400-410.
[3]	王敏, 毛玉红, 陈超, 白丹. 水处理工艺中铝盐水解物的毒性、形态及控制研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 479-488.
[4]	孙玉玉, 蔡鑫磊, 汤吉海, 黄晶晶, 黄益平, 刘杰. 反应精馏合成甲基丙烯酸甲酯工艺优化及节能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 56-63.
[5]	李梦圆, 郭凡, 李群生. 聚乙烯醇生产中回收工段第三、第四精馏塔的模拟与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 113-123.
[6]	张瑞杰, 刘志林, 王俊文, 张玮, 韩德求, 李婷, 邹雄. 水冷式复叠制冷系统的在线动态模拟与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 124-132.
[7]	王福安. 300kt/a环氧丙烷工艺反应器降耗减排分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 213-218.
[8]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[9]	李春利, 韩晓光, 刘加朋, 王亚涛, 王晨希, 王洪海, 彭胜. 填料塔液体分布器的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4479-4495.
[10]	刘炫麟, 王驿凯, 戴苏洲, 殷勇高. 热泵中氨基甲酸铵分解反应特性及反应器结构优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4522-4530.
[11]	王晨, 白浩良, 康雪. 大功率UV-LED散热与纳米TiO₂光催化酸性红26耦合系统性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4905-4916.
[12]	李蓝宇, 黄新烨, 王笑楠, 邱彤. 化工科研范式智能化转型的思考与展望[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3325-3330.
[13]	林海, 王彧斐. 考虑噪声约束的分布式风场布局优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3394-3403.
[14]	周龙大, 赵立新, 徐保蕊, 张爽, 刘琳. 电场-旋流耦合强化多相介质分离研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3443-3456.
[15]	薛凯, 王帅, 马金鹏, 胡晓阳, 种道彤, 王进仕, 严俊杰. 工业园区分布式综合能源系统的规划与调度[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3510-3519.