载体对铁基整体式催化剂上丙烯催化还原NO的影响

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2018-0150

化工进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (12): 4693-4700.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2018-0150

载体对铁基整体式催化剂上丙烯催化还原NO的影响

周皞¹, 葛梦瑶¹, 伍士国¹, 叶必朝¹, 苏亚欣²

1 常州工程职业技术学院, 江苏常州 213164;
2 东华大学环境科学与工程学院, 上海 201620

收稿日期:2018-01-18 修回日期:2018-04-16 出版日期:2018-12-05 发布日期:2018-12-05
通讯作者: 周皞(1976-),男,博士,教授,研究方向为燃烧污染物控制。
作者简介:周皞(1976-),男,博士,教授,研究方向为燃烧污染物控制。E-mail:hzhou@czie.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51278095）、江苏省自然科学基金（BR20181161）及江苏省高校"青蓝工程"项目（2017）。

Effects of supports on the iron based monolithic catalysts for NO reduction with propene

ZHOU Hao¹, GE Mengyao¹, WU Shiguo¹, YE Bichao¹, SU Yaxin²

1 Changzhou Institute of Engineering Technology, Changzhou 213164, Jiangsu, China;
2 School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China

Received:2018-01-18 Revised:2018-04-16 Online:2018-12-05 Published:2018-12-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以Al₂O₃、SiO₂和TiO₂为载体，采用凝胶-溶胶法和浸渍法制备铁基堇青石整体式催化剂，并对其丙烯选择性催化还原NO性能进行了研究。通过N₂物理吸附/脱附、XRD、SEM、H₂-TPR、Py-FTIR和原位DRIFTS技术对催化剂进行了表征。不同载体对催化剂的表面酸性、氧化还原性能、比表面积和表面形貌有显著影响，从而导致丙烯还原NO的催化活性明显差异。C₃H₆-SCR的催化活性按Fe/Al₂O₃/CM > Fe/SiO₂/CM > Fe/TiO₂/CM依次降低。在450℃的有氧条件下，在Fe/Al₂O₃/CM上催化C₃H₆还原NO效率可达到100%，这主要是因为较好的氧化还原性能和丰富的Lewis酸性位。基于原位的DRIFTS研究表明，Lewis酸性位的增加有助于促进形成NO₂/NO₃^-物种，从而提高了催化性能。

关键词: 催化剂载体, 选择性催化还原, 一氧化氮(NO), 丙烯(C₃H₆), Lewis酸性位

Abstract: Monolithic iron based catalysts supported on alumina, silica, and titania were prepared using the sol-gel and impregnation method, with which the selective catalytic reduction of NO with propene has been investigated. The catalysts were characterized by N₂-physisorption, XRD, SEM, H₂-TPR, Py-FTIR and in situ DRIFTS technologies. The supports had significant influence on the acid sites, redox properties, specific surface area, and surface morphology which resulted in the differences in the catalytic activity of NO reduction. The C₃H₆-SCR performance decreased with the used catalysts in the order as Fe/Al₂O₃/CM > Fe/SiO₂/CM > Fe/TiO₂/CM. Fe/Al₂O₃/CM showed the highest activity with a nitrogen oxide conversion of 100% in the presence of oxygen at 450℃, which is mainly attributed to its good redox properties and abundant Lewis acid sites. Based on the in situ DRIFT studies, the increase of Lewis acid sites enhanced the formation of NO₂/NO₃^- species, so as to promote the catalytic activity.

Key words: catalyst support, selective catalytic reduction(SCR), nitric oxide, propene, Lewis acid sites

中图分类号:

X511

周皞, 葛梦瑶, 伍士国, 叶必朝, 苏亚欣. 载体对铁基整体式催化剂上丙烯催化还原NO的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(12): 4693-4700.

ZHOU Hao, GE Mengyao, WU Shiguo, YE Bichao, SU Yaxin. Effects of supports on the iron based monolithic catalysts for NO reduction with propene[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(12): 4693-4700.

参考文献

[1] 顾卫荣, 周明吉, 马薇. 燃煤烟气脱硝技术的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2012, 31(9):2084-2092. GU Weirong, ZHOU Mingji, MA Wei. Technology status and analysis on coal-fired flue gas denitrification[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2012, 31(9):2084-2092.
[2] 贺泓, 刘福东, 余运波, 等. 环境友好的选择性催化还原氮氧化物催化剂[J]. 中国科学化学, 2012, 42(4):446-468. HE Hong, LIU Fudong, YU Yunbo, et al. Environmental-friendly catalysts for the selective catalytic reduction of NO_x[J]. Scientia Sinica Chimica, 2012, 42(4):446-468.
[3] BURCH R, BREEN J, MEUNIER F. A review of the selective reduction of NO_x with hydrocarbons under lean-burn conditions with non-zeolitic oxide and platinum group metal catalysts[J]. Appl. Catal. B, 2002, 39(4):283-303.
[4] 周皞, 苏亚欣, 邓文义, 等. 负载金属分子筛类催化剂上HC-SCR研究进展[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2015, 38(10):64-73. ZHOU Hao, SU Yaxin, DENG Wenyi, et al. A review of HC-SCR over metal-based zeolite catalysts[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 38(10):64-73.
[5] 周皞, 苏亚欣, 邓文义, 等. 金属氧化物类催化剂上HC-SCR研究进展[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2016, 39(1):93-100. ZHOU Hao, SU Yaxin, DENG Wenyi, et al. A review of HC-SCR over metal oxides-based catalysts[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 39(1):93-100.
[6] WILLIAMS J L. Monolith structures, materials, properties and uses[J]. Catal. Today, 2001, 69(1):3-9.
[7] LIU Z, IHL WOO S. Recent advances in catalytic deNO_x science and technology[J]. Catal. Rev., 2006, 48(1):43-89.
[8] ROY S, HEGDE M, MADRAS G. Catalysis for NO_x abatement[J]. Appl. Energ., 2009, 86(11):2283-2297.
[9] BLANCO J, AVILA P, SUÁREZ S, et al. Alumina-and titania-based monolithic catalysts for low temperature selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides[J]. Appl. Catal. B, 2000, 28(3/4):235-244.
[10] SMIRNIOTIS P G, SREEKANTH P M, PEÑA D A, et al. Manganese oxide catalysts supported on TiO₂, Al₂O₃, and SiO₂:a comparison for low-temperature SCR of NO with NH₃[J]. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2006, 45(19):6436-6443.
[11] 张相俊, 刘晓刚, 李清雍, 等. 载体对铜基催化剂NH₃-SCR低温脱硝性能的影响[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2017, 45(2):220-226. ZHANG Xiangjun, LIU Xiaogang, LI Qingyong, et al. Effect of carrier on the performance of copper based catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH₃ at low temperature[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2017, 45(2):220-226.
[12] ZHOU H, SU Y, LIAO W, et al. Preparation, characterization, and properties of monolithic Fe/Al₂O₃/cordierite catalysts for NO reduction with C₂H₆[J]. Appl. Catal. A, 2015, 505:402-409.
[13] 杨溪, 苏亚欣, 钱文燕, 等. Fe-Ag/Al₂O₃催化丙烯还原NO的实验研究[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2017, 45(11):1365-1375 YANG Xi, SU Yaxin, QIAN Wenyan, et al. Experimental study on selective catalytic reduction of NO by C₃H₆ over Fe-Ag/Al₂O₃ catalysts[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2017, 45(11):1365-1375.
[14] GUAN B, LIN H, ZHU L, et al. Selective catalytic reduction of NO_x with NH₃ over Mn, Ce substitution Ti_0.9V_0.1O_2-δ nanocomposites catalysts prepared by self-propagating high-temperature synthesis method[J]. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115(26):12850-12863.
[15] SU J H, LIU Q Y, LIU Z Y, et al. Honeycomb CuO/Al₂O₃/cordierite catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of no by NH₃——effect of Al₂O₃ coating[J]. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2008, 47(13):4295-4301.
[16] BALLE P, GEIGER B, KURETI S. Selective catalytic reduction of NO_x by NH₃ on Fe/HBEA zeolite catalysts in oxygen-rich exhaust[J]. Appl. Catal. B., 2009, 85(3):109-119.
[17] LIU F, HE H. Structure-activity relationship of iron titanate catalysts in the selective catalytic reduction of NO_x with NH₃[J]. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114(40):16929-16936.
[18] PAN H, GUO Y, BI H T. NO_x adsorption and reduction with C₃H₆ over Fe/zeolite catalysts:effect of catalyst support[J]. Chem. Eng. J., 2015, 280:66-73.
[19] YUAN E, WU G, DAI W, et al. One-pot construction of Fe/ZSM-5 zeolites for the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides by ammonia[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2017, 7(14):3036-3044.
[20] WU S, YAO X, ZHANG L, et al. Improved low temperature NH₃-SCR performance of FeMnTiO(x) mixed oxide with CTAB-assisted synthesis[J]. Chem. Commun., 2015, 51(16):3470.
[21] LIU J, LI X, ZHAO Q, et al. The selective catalytic reduction of NO with propene over Cu-supported Ti-Ce mixed oxide catalysts:promotional effect of ceria[J]. J. Mol. Catal. A:Chem., 2013, 378:115-123.
[22] YUAN D, LI X, ZHAO Q, et al. A novel CuTi-containing catalyst derived from hydrotalcite-like compounds for selective catalytic reduction of NO with C₃H₆ under lean-burn conditions[J]. J. Catal., 2014, 309:268-279.
[23] EMEIS C A. Determination of integrated molar extinction coefficients for infrared absorption bands of pyridine adsorbed on solid acid catalysts[J]. J. Catal., 1993, 141(38):347-354.
[24] LI J, ZHU Y, RUI K, et al. Improvement of catalytic activity and sulfur-resistance of Ag/TiO₂-Al₂O₃ for NO reduction with propene under lean burn conditions[J]. Appl. Catal. B, 2008, 80(3):202-213.
[25] YANG D, LI J, WEN M, et al. Enhanced activity of Ca-doped Cu/ZrO₂ for nitrogen oxides reduction with propylene in the presence of excess oxygen[J]. Catal. Today, 2008, 139(1):2-7.
[26] SATSUMA A, SHIMIZU K I. In situ FT/IR study of selective catalytic reduction of NO over alumina-based catalysts[J]. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 2003, 29(1):71-84.
[27] LONG R, YANG R. FTIR and kinetic studies of the mechanism of Fe³⁺-exchanged TiO₂-pillared clay catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NO with ammonia[J]. J. Catal., 2000, 190(1):22-31.
[28] MA Q, LIU Y, HE H. Synergistic effect between NO₂ and SO₂ in their adsorption and reaction on γ-alumina[J]. J. Phys. Chem. A, 2008, 112(29):6630-6635.
[29] KIKUCHI E, YOGO K. Selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen monoxide by methane on zeolite catalysts in an oxygen-rich atmosphere[J]. Catal. Today, 1994, 22(1):73-86.
[30] YUAN D, LI X, ZHAO Q, et al. Effect of surface Lewis acidity on selective catalytic reduction of NO by C₃H₆ over calcined hydrotalcite[J]. Appl. Catal. A, 2013, 451(2):176-183.
[31] NARASIMHARAO K, MALIK M A, MOKHTAR M M, et al. Iron oxide supported sulfated TiO₂ nanotube catalysts for NO reduction with propane[J]. Ceram Int., 2014, 40(3):4039-4053.
[32] ZHOU H, SU Y, LIAO W, et al. NO reduction by propane over monolithic cordierite-based Fe/Al₂O₃ catalyst:reaction mechanism and effect of H₂O/SO₂[J]. Fuel, 2016, 182:352-360.

载体对铁基整体式催化剂上丙烯催化还原NO的影响

Effects of supports on the iron based monolithic catalysts for NO reduction with propene

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	邓丽萍, 时好雨, 刘霄龙, 陈瑶姬, 严晶颖. 非贵金属改性钒钛基催化剂NH₃-SCR脱硝协同控制VOCs[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 542-548.
[2]	王乐乐, 杨万荣, 姚燕, 刘涛, 何川, 刘逍, 苏胜, 孔凡海, 朱仓海, 向军. SCR脱硝催化剂掺废特性及性能影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 489-497.
[3]	王晋刚, 张剑波, 唐雪娇, 刘金鹏, 鞠美庭. 机动车尾气脱硝催化剂Cu-SSZ-13的改性研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4636-4648.
[4]	龚鹏程, 严群, 陈锦富, 温俊宇, 苏晓洁. 铁酸钴复合碳纳米管活化过硫酸盐降解铬黑T的性能及机理[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3572-3581.
[5]	于志庆, 黄文斌, 王晓晗, 邓开鑫, 魏强, 周亚松, 姜鹏. B掺杂Al₂O₃@C负载CoMo型加氢脱硫催化剂性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3550-3560.
[6]	李佳, 樊星, 陈莉, 李坚. 硝酸生产尾气中NO _x 和N₂O联合脱除技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3770-3779.
[7]	张巍, 秦川, 谢康, 周运河, 董梦瑶, 李婕, 汤云灏, 马英, 宋健. H₂-SCR改性铂系催化剂低温脱硝的应用及性能强化挑战[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2954-2962.
[8]	张宁, 吴海滨, 李钰, 李剑锋, 程芳琴. 漂浮型光催化材料的制备及其在水处理领域的应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2475-2485.
[9]	马源, 肖晴月, 岳君容, 崔彦斌, 刘姣, 许光文. CeO₂-Al₂O₃复合载体负载Ni基催化剂催化CO _x 共甲烷化性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2421-2428.
[10]	王嘉, 彭冲, 唐磊, 陆安慧. 渣油加氢催化剂活性相结构调控及对反应性能影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1811-1821.
[11]	周皞, 张恒, 温妮妮, 王旭瑞, 徐璐, 李玮, 苏亚欣. Cu-SAPO-44分子筛的制备及其C₃H₆-SCR脱硝性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1373-1382.
[12]	刘亮, 王朝曦, 李鑫龙, 张高山, 王守阳, 张林林, 陆畅, 卿梦霞. 钒钛系脱硝催化剂抗硫酸氢铵中毒改进措施研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(1): 215-225.
[13]	宋玉昆, 王国刚, 张新功, 刘大阔, 张金庆, 林瀚. SNAR：一种新型非氨基还原除酸脱硝工艺技术[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(S1): 606-612.
[14]	汪兴, 赵子龙, 张小山, 王宏杰, 董文艺, 陈慧慧. 制备条件对生物炭载铁催化剂催化破络Ni-EDTA性能及活性组分浸出的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(9): 4831-4839.
[15]	曾军建, 赵基钢. 乙炔氢氯化金基无汞催化剂的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(7): 3589-3596.