Progress in amine-functionalized mesoporous silica for CO2 capture

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-0890

Abstract

Abstract:

As to its high selectivity, high adsorption capacity, fast adsorption kinetics, good regeneration performance and cycling stability, amine-functionalized mesoporous has received much attention and has excellent prospects for application in CO₂ capture technology. In this paper, the adsorption capacity of mesoporous silica M41S, SBA-n, FDU-n, KIT-n, MCF, MSN and HMS was compared, and the structural characteristics of MCM-41 and SBA-15 are summarized. The principles of physical impregnation, covalent tethering via silane linkage and direct covalent tethering via in-situ polymerization for amine loading are presented. The effects of differences in silica source, internal material properties, other gases and additives on the adsorption capacity are analyzed. In conclusion, the future development goals of adsorbents were clarified and an outlook on the research direction of amine-functionalized mesoporous silica materials is provided. It is noted that future attention can be paid to the effect of mesoporous silica microstructure and temperature on the interaction between amine and CO₂ to enhance the stability of amine-functionalized mesoporous silica to promote its application in practical environments.

Key words: CO₂capture, silica, adsorption, desorption, adsorbents

摘要：

胺功能化介孔二氧化硅因其高选择性、高吸附容量、快速的吸附动力学、良好的再生性能和循环稳定性受到广泛关注，在二氧化碳捕集技术中具有优良的应用前景。本文比较了胺改性的M41S、SBA-n、KIT-n、介孔二氧化硅泡沫、介孔二氧化硅纳米球和六方介孔二氧化硅的吸附性能，总结了MCM-41和SBA-15的结构特点。介绍了胺化合物的负载方式——湿法浸渍、化学接枝和原位聚合的胺负载原理。分析了硅源、载体内部性质、气体选择性和不同添加剂对胺功能化介孔二氧化硅材料吸附二氧化碳能力的影响。最后，点明了吸附剂未来的发展目标，对胺功能化介孔二氧化硅材料的研究方向进行了展望。指出未来可关注介孔二氧化硅微观结构和温度对胺与二氧化碳相互作用的影响，增强胺功能化介孔二氧化硅的稳定性，推进其在实际环境下的应用。

关键词: 二氧化碳捕集, 二氧化硅, 吸附（作用）, 脱附, 吸附剂

CLC Number:

TQ028

WANG Yiru, SONG Xiaosan, SHUI Boyang, WANG Sanfan. Progress in amine-functionalized mesoporous silica for CO₂ capture[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(S1): 536-544.

王一茹, 宋小三, 水博阳, 王三反. 胺功能化介孔二氧化硅捕集CO₂的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(S1): 536-544.

Figures/Tables 7

References 68

1	RIDUAN S N, ZHANG Y. Recent developments in carbon dioxide utilization under mild conditions[J]. Dalton Trans., 2010, 39(14): 3347-3357.
2	EDENHOFER O. Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change[M]. UK: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
3	OBERGASSEL W, ARENS C, HERMWILLE L, et al. Phoenix from the ashes—An analysis of the Paris agreement to the United Nations framework convention on climate change[J]. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, 2016, 1: 1-54.
4	WANG M, LAWAL A, STEPHENSON P, et al. Post-combustion CO₂ capture with chemical absorption: a state-of-the-art review[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2011, 89(9): 1609-1624.
5	彭召静, 赵彦杰, 黄成德, 等. 用于燃烧后 CO₂ 捕集系统的胺基固态吸附材料研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(2): 610-620.
	PENG Zhaojing, ZHAO Yanjie, HUANG Chengde, et al. Recent advances in amine-based solid sorbents for post-combustion CO₂ capture[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(2): 610-620.
6	BEN-MANSOUR R, HABIB M A, BAMIDELE O E, et al. Carbon capture by physical adsorption: Materials, experimental investigations and numerical modeling and simulations—A review[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 161: 225-255.
7	OSCHATZ M, ANTONIETTI M. A search for selectivity to enable CO₂ capture with porous adsorbents[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2018, 11(1): 57-70.
8	XU X, SONG C, ANDRESEN J M, et al. Novel polyethylenimine-modified mesoporous molecular sieve of MCM-41 type as high-capacity adsorbent for CO₂ capture[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2002, 16(6): 1463-1469.
9	MCCUSKER L, LIEBAU F, ENGELHARDT G. Nomenclature of structural and compositional characteristics of ordered microporous and mesoporous materials with inorganic hosts (IUPAC Recommendations 2001)[J]. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 2001, 73(2): 381-394.
10	RAO N, WANG M, SHANG Z, et al. CO₂ adsorption by amine-functionalized MCM-41: A comparison between impregnation and grafting modification methods[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2018, 32(1): 670-677.
11	HU X E, LIU L, LUO X, et al. A review of N-functionalized solid adsorbents for post-combustion CO₂ capture[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 260: 114244.
12	COSTA J A S, PARANHOS C M. Mitigation of silica-rich wastes: An alternative to the synthesis eco-friendly silica-based mesoporous materials[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2020, 309: 110570.
13	SELVAM P, BHATIA S K, SONWANE C G. Recent advances in processing and characterization of periodic mesoporous MCM-41 silicate molecular sieves[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2001, 40(15): 3237-3261.
14	BECK J S, VARTULI J C, ROTH W J, et al. A new family of mesoporous molecular sieves prepared with liquid crystal templates[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1992, 114(27): 10834-10843.
15	丁明月, 刘梦龙, 岳海荣, 等.TEPA/MCM-41固体胺吸附剂的制备及其CO₂吸附性能研究[J]. 应用化工, 2019, 48(11): 2533-2537.
	DING Mingyue, LIU Menglong, YUE Hairong, et al. Preparation and performance of TEPA /MCM-41 solid amine adsorbents for CO₂ adsorption[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2019, 48(11): 2533-2537.
16	COSTA J A S, DE JESUS R A, SANTOS D O, et al. Synthesis, functionalization, and environmental application of silica-based mesoporous materials of the M41S and SBA-n families: A review[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2021, 9(3): 105259.
17	TERRAB I, OUARGLI R, BOUKOUSSA B, et al. Assessment of the intrinsic interactions of mesoporous silica with carbon dioxide[J]. Research on Chemical Intermediates, 2017, 43(7): 3775-3786.
18	MIAO Y, HE Z, ZHU X, et al. Operating temperatures affect direct air capture of CO₂ in polyamine-loaded mesoporous silica[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 426: 131875.
19	饶娜. 介孔MCM-41结构调控及其氨功能化对CO₂吸附性能影响的研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉轻工大学, 2019.
	RAO Na. Study on structure regulation and effect of amine functionalization of mesoporous MCM-41 on CO₂ adsorption performance[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan Polytechnic University, 2019.
20	MUKHERJEE S, SAMANTA A N. Low to high-pressure CO₂ separation using amine-functionalized mobile composite matter, isotherm modelling and heat of adsorption study[J]. Separation Science and Technology, 2021, 57(2): 209-224.
21	ZHAO P, ZHANG G, HAO L. A novel blended amine functionalized porous silica adsorbent for carbon dioxide capture[J]. Adsorption, 2020, 26(5): 749-764.
22	LIU Y, LIN X, WU X, et al. Pentaethylenehexamine loaded SBA-16 for CO₂ capture from simulated flue gas[J]. Powder Technology, 2017, 318: 186-192.
23	史晶金, 刘亚敏, 陈杰, 等. 氨基功能化SBA-16对CO₂的动态吸附特性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2010, 26(11): 3023-3029.
	SHI Jingjin, LIU Yamin, CHEN Jie, et al. Dynamic performance of CO₂ adsorption with amine-modified SBA-16[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2010, 26(11): 3023-3029.
24	MEI D, GENG L, LIN Z, et al. CO₂ adsorption properties of mixed-amine functionalized mesoporous molecular sieve KIT-6[J]. Materials Research Express, 2018, 5(6): 065520.
25	KISHOR R, GHOSHAL A K. APTES grafted ordered mesoporous silica KIT-6 for CO₂ adsorption[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 262: 882-890.
26	BAI F, LIU X, SANI S, et al. Amine functionalized mesocellular silica foam as highly efficient sorbents for CO₂ capture[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2022: 121539.
27	LOU F, ZHANG A, ZHANG G, et al. Enhanced kinetics for CO₂ sorption in amine-functionalized mesoporous silica nanosphere with inverted cone-shaped pore structure[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 264: 11467.
28	SANZ-PéREZ E S, ARENCIBIA A, CALLEJA G, et al. Tuning the textural properties of HMS mesoporous silica. Functionalization towards CO₂ adsorption[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2018, 260: 235-244.
29	DIDAS S A. Structural properties of aminosilica materials for CO₂ capture[D]. USA: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2014.
30	CHAIKITTISILP W, KHUNSUPAT R, CHEN T T, et al. Poly(allylamine)-mesoporous silica composite materials for CO₂ capture from simulated flue gas or ambient air[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2011, 50(24): 14203-14210.
31	AHMED S, RAMLI A, YUSUP S, et al. Adsorption behavior of tetraethylenepentamine-functionalized Si-MCM-41 for CO₂ adsorption[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2017, 122: 33-42.
32	CAPLOW M. Kinetics of carbamate formation and breakdown[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1968, 90(24): 6795-6803.
33	DANCKWERTS P. The reaction of CO₂ with ethanolamines[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1979, 34(4): 443-446.
34	YANG Z Z, HE L N, ZHAO Y N, et al. CO₂ capture and activation by superbase/polyethylene glycol and its subsequent conversion[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2011, 4(10): 3971-3975.
35	JAHANDAR LASHAKI M, SAYARI A. CO₂ capture using triamine-grafted SBA-15: The impact of the support pore structure[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 334: 1260-1269.
36	HEYDARI-GORJI A, YANG Y, SAYARI A. Effect of the pore length on CO₂ adsorption over amine-modified mesoporous silicas[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2011, 25(9): 4206-4210.
37	QI G, WANG Y, ESTEVEZ L, et al. High efficiency nanocomposite sorbents for CO₂ capture based on amine-functionalized mesoporous capsules[J]. Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4(2): 444-452.
38	SAMANTA A, ZHAO A, SHIMIZU G K, et al. Post-combustion CO₂ capture using solid sorbents: a review[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(4): 1438-1463.
39	SAYARI A, BELMABKHOUT Y, SERNA-GUERRERO R. Flue gas treatment via CO₂ adsorption[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 171(3): 760-774.
40	SERNA-GUERRERO R, BELMABKHOUT Y, SAYARI A. Modeling CO₂ adsorption on amine-functionalized mesoporous silica: 1. A semi-empirical equilibrium model[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2010, 161(1/2): 173-181.
41	SAYARI A, HEYDARI-GORJI A, YANG Y. CO₂-induced degradation of amine-containing adsorbents: Reaction products and pathways[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2012, 134(33): 13834-13842.
42	HIYOSHI N, YOGO K, YASHIMA T. Adsorption characteristics of carbon dioxide on organically functionalized SBA-15[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2005, 84(1/2/3): 357-365.
43	HICKS J C, DRESE J H, FAUTH D J, et al. Designing adsorbents for CO₂ capture from flue gas-hyperbranched aminosilicas capable of capturing CO₂ reversibly[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2008, 130(10): 2902-2903.
44	SU Y, PENG L, SHIUE A, et al. Carbon dioxide adsorption on amine-impregnated mesoporous materials prepared from spent quartz sand[J]. J. Air. Waste Manag. Assoc., 2014, 64(7): 827-833.
45	LIANG G, LI Y, YANG C, et al. Production of biosilica nanoparticles from biomass power plant fly ash[J]. Waste Manag., 2020, 105: 8-17.
46	何文修. 稻壳灰基SiO₂纳米流体的制备及纳米颗粒强化CO₂吸收的基础研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江工业大学, 2016.
	HE Wenxiu. Synthesis of rice husk ash-based silica nanofluids for reinforcement of CO₂ absorption [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University of Technology, 2016.
47	LIOU T H, LIU S M, CHEN G W. Utilization of e-wastes as a sustainable silica source in synthesis of ordered mesostructured titania nanocomposites with high adsorption and photoactivity[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2022, 10(2): 107283.
48	MA Y, CHEN H, SHI Y, et al. Low cost synthesis of mesoporous molecular sieve MCM-41 from wheat straw ash using CTAB as surfactant[J]. Materials Research Bulletin, 2016, 77: 258-264.
49	ALVES R H, REIS T V, ROVANI S, et al. Green synthesis and characterization of biosilica produced from sugarcane waste ash[J]. Journal of Chemistry, 2017, 2017: 1-9.
50	ARUMUGAM A, KARUPPASAMY G, JEGADEESAN G B. Synthesis of mesoporous materials from bamboo leaf ash and catalytic properties of immobilized lipase for hydrolysis of rubber seed oil[J]. Materials Letters, 2018, 225: 113-116.
51	ARASI M A, SALEM A, SALEM S. Production of mesoporous and thermally stable silica powder from low grade kaolin based on eco-friendly template free route via acidification of appropriate zeolite compound for removal of cationic dye from wastewater[J]. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 2021, 19: 100366.
52	FU P, YANG T, FENG J, et al. Synthesis of mesoporous silica MCM-41 using sodium silicate derived from copper ore tailings with an alkaline molted-salt method[J]. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2015, 29: 338-343.
53	HARLICK P J, SAYARI A. Applications of pore-expanded mesoporous silica. 5. Triamine grafted material with exceptional CO₂ dynamic and equilibrium adsorption performance[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2007, 46(2): 446-458.
54	BELMABKHOUT Y, SAYARI A. Effect of pore expansion and amine functionalization of mesoporous silica on CO₂ adsorption over a wide range of conditions[J]. Adsorption, 2009, 15(3): 318-328.
55	LIN K Y, PETIT C, PARK A H. Effect of SO₂ on CO₂ capture using liquid-like nanoparticle organic hybrid materials[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27(8): 4167-4174.
56	BALI S, CHEN T T, CHAIKITTISILP W, et al. Oxidative stability of amino polymer–alumina hybrid adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27(3): 1547-1554.
57	PACIA R M, MANIANGLUNG C, KO Y S. In situ IR study on effect of alkyl chain length between amines on its stability against acidic gases[J]. Catalysts, 2019, 9(11): 910.
58	REZAEI F, JONES C W. Stability of supported amine adsorbents to SO₂ and NO _x in postcombustion CO₂ capture. 1. Single-component adsorption[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(34): 12192-12201.
59	LI X, HAN J, LIU Y, et al. Summary of research progress on industrial flue gas desulfurization technology[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2022, 281: 119849.
60	CHEREVOTAN A, RAJ J, PETER S C. An overview of porous silica immobilized amines for direct air CO₂ capture[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2021, 9(48): 27271-27303.
61	WANG J, LONG D, ZHOU H, et al. Surfactant promoted solid amine sorbents for CO₂ capture[J]. Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5(2): 5742-5749.
62	WANG L, AL-AUFI M, PACHECO C N, et al. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) addition to polyethylenimine (PEI)-impregnated silica increases amine accessibility during CO₂ sorption[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2019, 7(17): 14785-14795.
63	SAKWA-NOVAK M A, TAN S, JONES C W. Role of additives in composite PEI/oxide CO₂ adsorbents: Enhancement in the amine efficiency of supported PEI by PEG in CO₂ capture from simulated ambient air[J]. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7(44): 24748-24759.
64	SRIKANTH C S, CHUANG S S. Infrared study of strongly and weakly adsorbed CO₂ on fresh and oxidatively degraded amine sorbents[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013, 117(18): 9196-9205.
65	SRIKANTH C S, CHUANG S S. Spectroscopic investigation into oxidative degradation of silica-supported amine sorbents for CO₂ capture[J]. ChemSusChem, 2012, 5(8): 1435-1442.
66	ZHANG L, WANG X, FUJII M, et al. CO₂ capture over molecular basket sorbents: Effects of SiO₂ supports and PEG additive[J]. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2017, 26(5): 1030-1038.
67	YUE M B, SUN L B, CAO Y, et al. Promoting the CO₂ adsorption in the amine-containing SBA-15 by hydroxyl group[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2008, 114(1/2/3): 74-81.
68	郝兰霞. 氨基修饰SBA-15原粉基吸附剂的制备及其CO₂吸附性能[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2017.
	HAO Lanxia. Preparation of amino -modified SBA-15(p) adsorbent and CO₂ adsorption properties[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2017.

介孔 SiO₂	胺功能化（胺类别，与载体重量比）	吸附条件	吸附容量 /mmol·(gCO₂)^-1	解吸条件	循环能力（吸附容量的损失率，总循环次数）	参考文献
MCM-41	—	10%CO₂/N₂，75℃	0.66	—	—	［15］
MCM-41	TEPA，60%	12%CO₂/N₂，75℃	2.80	N₂，100℃	7.8%，5	［15］
MCM-41	PEI，50%	100%CO₂，25℃	3.53	真空，100℃	14.22%，5	［19］
MCM-48	—	100%CO₂，25℃	0.64	—	—	［20］
MCM-48	AEEA，30%	100%CO₂，25℃	3.33	—	—	［20］
SBA-15	PEI，70%	20%CO₂/N₂，75℃	3.71	—	—	［21］
SBA-15	PEI，30%+DEA，40%	20%CO₂/N₂，75℃	4.64	N₂，105℃	13.36%，15	［21］
SBA-15	TEPA，50%	400ppmCO₂/N₂，35℃	2.30	N₂，110℃	—，10	［18］
SBA-16	PEHA，30%	15%CO₂/He，70℃	2.1	He，120℃	6.2%，20	［22］
SBA-16	TEPA，30%	10%CO₂/N₂，60℃	0.97	N₂，110℃	—	［23］
KIT-6	3N +TETA，30%	15%CO₂/N₂，60℃	2.06	N₂，110℃	2.5%，20	［24］
KIT-6	APTES	100%CO₂，30℃	1.56	He，120℃	0，10	［25］
MCF	DAEAPTS，35%	15%CO₂/N₂，25℃	2.07	N₂，110℃	0，50	［26］
MSN	PEI，65%	15%CO₂/N₂，80℃	4.07	N₂，100℃	19%，5	［27］
HMS	PEI，50%	100%CO₂，45℃	2.40	—，110℃	0，4	［28］

介孔 SiO₂	胺功能化（胺类别，与载体重量比）	吸附条件	吸附容量 /mmol·(gCO₂)^-1	解吸条件	循环能力（吸附容量的损失率，总循环次数）	参考文献
MCM-41	—	10%CO₂/N₂，75℃	0.66	—	—	［15］
MCM-41	TEPA，60%	12%CO₂/N₂，75℃	2.80	N₂，100℃	7.8%，5	［15］
MCM-41	PEI，50%	100%CO₂，25℃	3.53	真空，100℃	14.22%，5	［19］
MCM-48	—	100%CO₂，25℃	0.64	—	—	［20］
MCM-48	AEEA，30%	100%CO₂，25℃	3.33	—	—	［20］
SBA-15	PEI，70%	20%CO₂/N₂，75℃	3.71	—	—	［21］
SBA-15	PEI，30%+DEA，40%	20%CO₂/N₂，75℃	4.64	N₂，105℃	13.36%，15	［21］
SBA-15	TEPA，50%	400ppmCO₂/N₂，35℃	2.30	N₂，110℃	—，10	［18］
SBA-16	PEHA，30%	15%CO₂/He，70℃	2.1	He，120℃	6.2%，20	［22］
SBA-16	TEPA，30%	10%CO₂/N₂，60℃	0.97	N₂，110℃	—	［23］
KIT-6	3N +TETA，30%	15%CO₂/N₂，60℃	2.06	N₂，110℃	2.5%，20	［24］
KIT-6	APTES	100%CO₂，30℃	1.56	He，120℃	0，10	［25］
MCF	DAEAPTS，35%	15%CO₂/N₂，25℃	2.07	N₂，110℃	0，50	［26］
MSN	PEI，65%	15%CO₂/N₂，80℃	4.07	N₂，100℃	19%，5	［27］
HMS	PEI，50%	100%CO₂，45℃	2.40	—，110℃	0，4	［28］

名称	化学式	分子量
聚乙烯亚胺（PEI）	（C₂H₅N） _n NH₃	600~5000
二乙烯三胺（DETA）	C₄H₁₃N₃	103.17
三乙烯四胺（TETA）	C₆H₁₈N₄	146.23
四乙烯五胺（TEPA）	C₈H₂₃N₅	189.30
五乙烯六胺（PEHA）	C₁₀H₂₈N₆	232.37
单乙醇胺（MEA）	C₂H₇NO	61.08
二乙醇胺（DEA）	C₄H₁₁NO₂	105.14
乙二胺（EDA）	C₂H₈N₂	60.10

名称	化学式	分子量
聚乙烯亚胺（PEI）	（C₂H₅N） _n NH₃	600~5000
二乙烯三胺（DETA）	C₄H₁₃N₃	103.17
三乙烯四胺（TETA）	C₆H₁₈N₄	146.23
四乙烯五胺（TEPA）	C₈H₂₃N₅	189.30
五乙烯六胺（PEHA）	C₁₀H₂₈N₆	232.37
单乙醇胺（MEA）	C₂H₇NO	61.08
二乙醇胺（DEA）	C₄H₁₁NO₂	105.14
乙二胺（EDA）	C₂H₈N₂	60.10

硅源	提取方法	SiO₂含量/%	结构特征			参考文献
硅源	提取方法	SiO₂含量/%	表面积/m²·g^-1	孔体积/cm³·g^-1	孔径/nm	参考文献
石英砂	NaOH提取法	99.99	1028	0.907	3.04	［44］
粉煤灰	NaOH提取法	44.41	115	0.13	3	［45］
稻壳灰	碳化法	81.72	—	—	40~50	［46］
电子废物	酸浸法	—	1033	0.887	2.73	［47］
小麦秸秆灰	NaOH提取法	90.00	1312	1.053	3.656	［48］
甘蔗渣	NaOH提取法	81.60	265	0.425	6.25	［49］
竹叶灰	NaOH提取法	83.30	1096	0.51	2.14	［50］
高岭土	NaOH提取法	60.00~61.00	637	0.682	4.3	［51］
铜尾矿	碱熔法	68.23~96.82	946.68	0.76	3.24	［52］

Progress in amine-functionalized mesoporous silica for CO₂ capture

胺功能化介孔二氧化硅捕集CO₂的研究进展

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 68

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	CUI Shoucheng, XU Hongbo, PENG Nan. Simulation analysis of two MOFs materials for O₂/He adsorption separation [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 382-390.
[2]	CHEN Chongming, CHEN Qiu, GONG Yunqian, CHE Kai, YU Jinxing, SUN Nannan. Research progresses on zeolite-based CO₂ adsorbents [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 411-419.
[3]	XU Chunshu, YAO Qingda, LIANG Yongxian, ZHOU Hualong. Research progress on functionalization strategies of covalent organic frame materials and its adsorption properties for Hg(Ⅱ) and Cr(Ⅵ) [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 461-478.
[4]	GU Yongzheng, ZHANG Yongsheng. Dynamic behavior and kinetic model of Hg⁰ adsorption by HBr-modified fly ash [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 498-509.
[5]	GUO Qiang, ZHAO Wenkai, XIAO Yonghou. Numerical simulation of enhancing fluid perturbation to improve separation of dimethyl sulfide/nitrogen via pressure swing adsorption [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 64-72.
[6]	WANG Shengyan, DENG Shuai, ZHAO Ruikai. Research progress on carbon dioxide capture technology based on electric swing adsorption [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 233-245.
[7]	GE Yafen, SUN Yu, XIAO Peng, LIU Qi, LIU Bo, SUN Chengying, GONG Yanjun. Research progress of zeolite for VOCs removal [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4716-4730.
[8]	SHI Keke, LIU Muzi, ZHAO Qiang, LI Jinping, LIU Guang. Properties and research progress of magnesium based hydrogen storage materials [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4731-4745.
[9]	WANG Shangbin, OU Hongxiang, XUE Honglai, CAO Haizhen, WANG Junqi, BI Haipu. Effect of xanthan gum and nano silica on the properties of fluorine-free surfactant mixed solution foam [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4856-4862.
[10]	SONG Weitao, SONG Huiping, FAN Zhenlian, FAN Biao, XUE Fangbin. Research progress of fly ash in anti-corrosion coatings [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4894-4904.
[11]	SHAO Zhiguo, REN Wen, XU Shipei, NIE Fan, XU Yu, LIU Longjie, XIE Shuixiang, LI Xingchun, WANG Qingji, XIE Jiacai. Influence of final temperature on the distribution and characteristics of oil-based drilling cuttings pyrolysis products [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4929-4938.
[12]	YANG Ying, HOU Haojie, HUANG Rui, CUI Yu, WANG Bing, LIU Jian, BAO Weiren, CHANG Liping, WANG Jiancheng, HAN Lina. Coal tar phenol-based carbon nanosphere prepared by Stöber method for adsorption of CO₂ [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 5011-5018.
[13]	JIANG Jing, CHEN Xiaoyu, ZHANG Ruiyan, SHENG Guangyao. Research progress of manganese-loaded biochar preparation and its application in environmental remediation [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(8): 4385-4397.
[14]	ZHANG Zhen, LI Dan, CHEN Chen, WU Jinglan, YING Hanjie, QIAO Hao. Separation and purification of salivary acids with adsorption resin [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(8): 4153-4158.
[15]	WANG Zhicai, LIU Weiwei, ZHOU Cong, PAN Chunxiu, YAN Honglei, LI Zhanku, YAN Jingchong, REN Shibiao, LEI Zhiping, SHUI Hengfu. Synthesis and performance of a superplasticizer based on coal-based humic acid [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3634-3642.