基于微生物燃料电池的新型膜生物反应器研究进展

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2019-0494

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

运行耗能低和出水水质好是未来废水处理技术的发展趋势。生物电化学辅助膜生物反应器（bioelectrochemistry-assisted membrane bioreactor，BEMBR）耦合了膜生物反应器和微生物燃料电池两种新型水处理技术，取长补短，有效降低了膜污染速率和提高了出水水质，具有良好的应用前景。本文根据膜组件在BEMBR中的功能综述3种典型反应器构型的优势与不足；从COD去除路径和总氮脱除机制分析了BEMBR污泥减量、能耗削减和污染物去除提升的机理；从物理机制、化学机制及生物机制详细阐述了BEMBR抗膜污染机理。最后，针对目前BEMBR存在的局限，从产电性能、污染物去除效果、膜污染控制机理和微生物种群及代谢等方面提出展望，为加快BEMBR工程化应用提供理论参考。

关键词: 膜, 生物工程, 生物反应器, 膜污染, 脱氮, 生物电化学

Abstract:

Low energy consumption and good effluent quality are the development trend of wastewater treatment technology in the future. In order to accomplish this，a bioelectrochemistry-assisted membrane bioreactor (BEMBR) is developed by combining the membrane bioreactor with the microbial fuel cells. Taking advantages of these two bio-technologies，BEMBR has the merits of slow membrane fouling and good effluent quality for engineering applications. According to the role of membrane modules in BEMBR, three typical reactor configurations are discussed on term of their superiority and weakness. For pollutants removal, the COD-removing pathways and nitrogen-removing mechanisms are analyzed, which account for sludge reduction, energy reduction, and improvement of pollutants removal. Then, the membrane fouling mitigation mechanisms of BEMBR are thoroughly explored from the physical, chemical and biological perspectives. Lastly, this review proposes the research directions of BEMBR about the electricity generation, pollutants removal, membrane fouling control mechanisms, and microbial population and metabolism, which will provide more theoretical basis for future applications of BEMBR.

Key words: membrane, biological engineering, bioreactors, membrane fouling, denitrification, bioelectrochemisty

中图分类号:

应贤斌,黄利杰,汪锐,冯华军. 基于微生物燃料电池的新型膜生物反应器研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(12): 5557-5564.

Xianbin YING,Lijie HUANG,Rui WANG,Huajun FENG. Research progress of novel membrane bioreactor based onmicrobial fuel cell[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(12): 5557-5564.

图/表 6

参考文献 76

1	BURMAN I, SINHA A. A review on membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors: control and mitigation[M]. Singapore: Springer, 2017: 281-315.
2	聂丽君, 钟华文, 周如金, 等. 混凝/厌氧/兼氧-好氧膜生物反应器组合新工艺处理制革废水[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(9): 3995-4003.
	NIE Lijun, ZHONG Huawen, ZHOU Rujin, et al. Treatment of tanning wastewater by integrated process consisted of coagulation, anaerobic baffled reactor and anoxic/aerobic-membrane bioreactor[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(9): 3995-4003.
3	ZHENG Y, ZHANG W, TANG B, et al. Membrane fouling mechanism of biofilm-membrane bioreactor (BF-MBR): pore blocking model and membrane cleaning[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 250: 398-405.
4	LU Y, XIAO B, WANG H, et al. Simultaneously recovering electricity and water from wastewater by osmotic microbial fuel cells: performance and membrane fouling[J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2018, 12(4): 1-5.
5	ZHANG J, SATTI A, CHEN X, et al. Low-voltage electric field applied into MBR for fouling suppression: performance and mechanisms[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 273: 223-230.
6	HUANG Q, LIU H, WANG Y, et al. A hybrid electric field assisted vacuum membrane distillation method to mitigate membrane fouling[J]. RCS Advances, 2018, 8(32): 18084-18092.
7	BIAN B, DAI S, CAI X, et al. 3D printed porous carbon anode for enhanced power generation in microbial fuel cell[J]. Nano Energy, 2018, 44: 174-180.
8	ZOU L, QIAO Y, LI C M. Boosting microbial electrocatalytic kinetics for high power density: insights into synthetic biology and advanced nanoscience[J]. Electrochemical Energy Reviews, 2018, 1(4): 1-32.
9	GAJARAJ S, HU Z. Integration of microbial fuel cell techniques into activated sludge wastewater treatment processes to improve nitrogen removal and reduce sludge production[J]. Chemosphere, 2014, 117(1): 151-157.
10	LOGAN B E, HAMELERS B, ROZENDAL R, et al. Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(17): 5181-5192.
11	ZHANG B, ZHAO H, ZHOU S, et al. A novel UASB-MFC-BAF integrated system for high strength molasses wastewater treatment and bioelectricity generation[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(23): 5687-5693.
12	CHENG J, ZHU X P, NI J R, et al. Palm oil mill effluent treatment using a two-stage microbial fuel cells system integrated with immobilized biological aerated filters[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(8): 2729-2734.
13	WANG J, ZHENG Y, JIA H, et al. In situ investigation of processing property in combination with integration of microbial fuel cell and tubular membrane bioreactor[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 149(4): 163-168.
14	HOU D, LU L, REN Z J. Microbial fuel cells and osmotic membrane bioreactors have mutual benefits for wastewater treatment and energy production[J]. Water Research, 2016, 98: 183-189.
15	WANG Y K, SHENG G P, LI W W, et al. Development of a novel bioelectrochemical membrane reactor for wastewater treatment[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(21): 9256-9261.
16	KIM K Y, CHAE K J, CHOI M J, et al. High-quality effluent and electricity production from non-CEM based flow-through type microbial fuel cell[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 218(3): 19-23.
17	DI S, WEI Z, WANG D, et al. Performance and membrane fouling characteristics in a membrane bioreactor coupled with microbial fuel cell system[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2014, 8(4): 1367-1372.
18	NEOH C H, NOOR Z Z, MUTAMIM N S A, et al. Green technology in wastewater treatment technologies: integration of membrane bioreactor with various wastewater treatment systems[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 283: 582-594.
19	TIAN Y U, CHAO J I, WANG K, et al. Assessment of an anaerobic membrane bio-electrochemical reactor (AnMBER) for wastewater treatment and energy recovery[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 450(2): 242-248.
20	LI J, GE Z, HE Z. A fluidized bed membrane bioelectrochemical reactor for energy-efficient wastewater treatment[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 167(3): 310-315.
21	MA J, WANG Z, DI H, et al. Long-term investigation of a novel electrochemical membrane bioreactor for low-strength municipal wastewater treatment[J]. Water Research, 2015, 78: 98-110.
22	ZHANG G, ZHANG H, MA Y, et al. Membrane filtration biocathode microbial fuel cell for nitrogen removal and electricity generation[J]. Enzyme & Microbial Technology, 2014, 60: 56-63.
23	TIAN Y, LI H, LI L, et al. In-situ integration of microbial fuel cell with hollow-fiber membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment and membrane fouling mitigation[J]. Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 2015, 64(4): 189-195.
24	LI Y H, LIU L F, YANG F L, et al. Performance of carbon fiber cathode membrane with C-Mn-Fe-O catalyst in MBR-MFC for wastewater treatment[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 484: 27-34.
25	LIU J, LIU L, GAO B, et al. Integration of bio-electrochemical cell in membrane bioreactor for membrane cathode fouling reduction through electricity generation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 430(8): 196-202.
26	HUANG L, LI X, REN Y, et al. Preparation of conductive microfiltration membrane and its performance in a coupled configuration of membrane bioreactor with microbial fuel cell[J]. RCS Advances, 2017, 7(34): 20824-20832.
27	WANG Y K, SHENG G P, SHI B J, et al. A novel electrochemical membrane bioreactor as a potential net energy producer for sustainable wastewater treatment[J]. Scientific Reports, 2013, 3(5): 1864.
28	CHENG B, WANG J, LIU W, et al. Membrane fouling reduction in a cost-effective integrated system of microbial fuel cell and membrane bioreactor[J]. Water Science & Technology, 2017, 76(3): 653-661.
29	MODIN O, FUKUSHI K, RABAEY K, et al. Bioelectrochemical hydrogen peroxide production: an opportunity for sustainable mitigation of membrane bioreactor fouling[J]. Journal of the Textile Institute Transactions, 2010, 2010(7): 309-321.
30	WANG Y P, LIU X W, LI W W, et al. A microbial fuel cell-membrane bioreactor integrated system for cost-effective wastewater treatment[J]. Applied Energy, 2012, 98(1): 230-235.
31	GAO C, LIU L, YANG F. Development of a novel proton exchange membrane-free integrated MFC system with electric membrane bioreactor and air contact oxidation bed for efficient and energy-saving wastewater treatment[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 238: 472-483.
32	LI Y, LIU L, LIU J, et al. PPy/AQS (9, 10-anthraquinone-2-sulfonic acid) and PPy/ARS (alizarin red’s) modified stainless steel mesh as cathode membrane in an integrated MBR/MFC system[J]. Desalination, 2014, 349: 94-101.
33	FENG Z, FALK H, UWE S D, et al. Challenges and constraints of using oxygen cathodes in microbial fuel cells[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(17): 5193-5199.
34	PARK Y, PARK S, NGUYEN V K, et al. Complete nitrogen removal by simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in flat-panel air-cathode microbial fuel cells treating domestic wastewater[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 316: 673-679.
35	YANG S, LIU Z, HOU J, et al. Research progress of air cathode for microbial fuel cells[J]. Chinese Journal of Power Sources, 2015, 9: 2031-2034.
36	GUDE V G. Wastewater treatment in microbial fuel cells:an overview[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 122: 287-307.
37	ZUO K, LIANG S, LIANG P, et al. Carbon filtration cathode in microbial fuel cell to enhance wastewater treatment[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 185(6): 426-430.
38	WU Y, YANG Q, ZENG Q, et al. Enhanced low C/N nitrogen removal in an innovative microbial fuel cell (MFC) with electroconductivity aerated membrane (EAM) as biocathode[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 316: 315-322.
39	GAO C, LIU L, YANG F J J O P S. Novel carbon fiber cathode membrane with Fe/Mn/C/F/O elements in bio-electrochemical system (BES) to enhance wastewater treatment[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2018, 379: 123-133.
40	LI N, KAKARLA R, MOON J M, et al. Determination of microbial growth by protein assay in an air-cathode single chamber microbial fuel cell[J]. Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2015, 25(7): 1114-1118.
41	李正. 水解酸化-悬浮载体复合MBR处理抗生素废水研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2009.
	LI Zheng. Study on treating antibiotic wastewater by hydrolysis acidification-suspended carrier hybrid MBR[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2009.
42	ZHOU G, ZHOU Y, ZHOU G, et al. Assessment of a novel overflow-type electrochemical membrane bioreactor (EMBR) for wastewater treatment, energy recovery and membrane fouling mitigation[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 196: 648-655.
43	WU G, HAN B, ZHENG X, et al. Polypyrrole/sargassum activated carbon modified stainless-steel sponge as high-performance and low-cost bioanode for microbial fuel cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources,2018, 384: 86–92.
44	JIA Y, FENG H, SHEN D, et al. High-performance microbial fuel cell anodes obtained from sewage sludge mixed with fly ash[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 354: 27-32.
45	ERABLE B, OLIOT M, LACROIX R, et al. Iron-Nicarbazin derived platinum group metal-free electrocatalyst in scalable-size air-breathing cathodes for microbial fuel cells[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2018, 277: 127-135.
46	GAJDA I, GREENMAN J, SANTORO C, et al. Improved power and long term performance of microbial fuel cell with Fe-N-C catalyst in air-breathing cathode[J]. Energy, 2018, 144: 1073-1079.
47	SEVDA S, DOMINGUEZ-BENETTON X, VANBROEKHOVEN K, et al. High strength wastewater treatment accompanied by power generation using air cathode microbial fuel cell[J]. Applied Energy, 2013, 105(2): 194-206.
48	LILIAN M, KRISHNA P K, BRUCE E L, et al. A hybrid microbial fuel cell membrane bioreactor with a conductive ultrafiltration membrane biocathode for wastewater treatment[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(20): 11821-11828.
49	JIAN L, ZHENG G, ZHEN H. Advancing membrane bioelectrochemical reactor (MBER) with hollow-fiber membranes installed in the cathode compartment[J]. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 2014, 89(9): 1330-1336.
50	ZHAI S, JI M, ZHAO Y, et al. Effects of salinity and COD/N on denitrification and bacterial community in dicyclic-type electrode based biofilm reactor[J]. Chemosphere, 2018, 192: 328-336.
51	WAN Y, ZHOU L, SHU W, et al. Syntrophic growth of geobacter sulfurreducens accelerates anaerobic denitrification[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2018, 9: 1572.
52	KELLY P T, HE Z. Nutrients removal and recovery in bioelectrochemical systems: a review[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 153(2): 351-360.
53	YATES M D, SIEGERT M, LOGAN B E. Hydrogen evolution catalyzed by viable and non-viable cells on biocathodes[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(30): 16841-16851.
54	冯玉杰, 沈宏, 杨靖明, 等. 电极生物膜法反硝化工艺条件及过程[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2008, 40(12): 1956-1961.
	FENG Yujie, SHEN Hong, YANG Jingming, et al. Technological conditions and process analysis on denitrification of biofilm-electrode system[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology (China), 2008, 40(12): 1956-1961.
55	何细军, 田光明, 吴东雷, 等. 生物膜电极法反硝化脱氮研究进展[J]. 水处理技术, 2010, 36(9): 6-9.
	HE Xijun, TIAN Guangming, WU Donglei, et al. Progress of denitrification by biofilm-electrode process[J]. Water Treatment Technology, 2010, 36(9): 6-9.
56	CHEN G W, CHOI S J, LEE T H, et al. Application of biocathode in microbial fuel cells: cell performance and microbial community[J]. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology, 2008, 79(3): 379-388.
57	WANG Y K， LI W W，SHENG G P, et al. In-situ utilization of generated electricity in an electrochemical membrane bioreactor to mitigate membrane fouling[J]. Water Research, 2013, 47(15): 5794-5800.
58	LI W, ZHANG S, GANG C, et al. Simultaneous electricity generation and pollutant removal in microbial fuel cell with denitrifying biocathode over nitrite[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 126: 136-141.
59	MENG F, ZHANG S, OH Y, et al. Fouling in membrane bioreactors: an updated review[J]. Water Research, 2017, 114: 151-180.
60	ZSIRAI T, BUZATU P, AERTS P, et al. Efficacy of relaxation, backflushing, chemical cleaning and clogging removal for an immersed hollow fibre membrane bioreactor[J]. Water Research, 2012, 46(14): 4499-4507.
61	AHMED F, LALIA B S, KOCHKODAN V, et al. Electrically conductive polymeric membranes for fouling prevention and detection: a review[J]. Desalination, 2016, 391: 1-15.
62	WANG J, BI F, NGO H H, et al. Evaluation of energy-distribution of a hybrid microbial fuel cell-membrane bioreactor (MFC-MBR) for cost-effective wastewater treatment[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 200: 420-425.
63	DUDCHENKO A V, ROLF J, RUSSELL K, et al. Organic fouling inhibition on electrically conducting carbon nanotube-polyvinyl alcohol composite ultrafiltration membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 468(20): 1-10.
64	LIU L, LIU J, GAO B, et al. Conductive and hydrophilic polypyrrole modified membrane cathodes and fouling reduction in MBR[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 429(4): 252-258.
65	NA L, LIU L, YANG F. Highly conductive graphene/PANi-phytic acid modified cathodic filter membrane and its antifouling property in EMBR in neutral conditions[J]. Desalination, 2014, 338(2): 10-16.
66	LIU H, HUANG Q, WANG Y, et al. PTFE conductive membrane for EVMD process and the application of electro-catalysis[J]. Separation & Purification Technology, 2017, 187: 327-333
67	WANG X, HU T, WANG Z, et al. Permeability recovery of fouled forward osmosis membranes by chemical cleaning during a long-term operation of anaerobic osmotic membrane bioreactors treating low-strength wastewater[J]. Water Research, 2017, 123: 505-512.
68	BAI R, LEOW H F. Microfiltration of activated sludge wastewater-the effect of system operation parameters[J]. Separation & Purification Technology, 2002, 29(2): 189-198.
69	LI H, ZUO W, TIAN Y, et al. Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in a novel membrane bioelectrochemical reactor with low membrane fouling tendency[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24(6): 5106-5117.
70	WANG Z, WU Z, TANG S. Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) properties and their effects on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor[J]. Water Research, 2009, 43(9): 2504-2512.
71	QIANG L, XIKUN L, DEQIANG G, et al. Effects of SRT on LB-EPS and membrane fouling in a HMBR[J]. Technology of Water Treatment, 2018, 44: 99-102.
72	CHENG K Y, GINIGE M P, KAKSONEN A H. Ano-cathodophilic biofilm catalyzes both anodic carbon oxidation and cathodic denitrification[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(18): 10372-10378.
73	CHENG K Y, HO G, CORDRUWISCH R. Anodophilic biofilm catalyzes cathodic oxygen reduction[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(1): 518-525.
74	NA L, LIU L, YANG F. Power generation enhanced by a polyaniline-phytic acid modified filter electrode integrating microbial fuel cell with membrane bioreactor[J]. Separation & Purification Technology, 2014, 132: 213-217.
75	STRYCHARZGLAVEN S M, SNIDER R M, GUISEPPIELIE A, et al. On the electrical conductivity of microbial nanowires and biofilms[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2011, 4(11): 4366-4379.
76	ISHIZAKI S, TERADA K, MIYAKE H, et al. Impact of anodic respiration on biopolymer production and consequent membrane fouling[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(17): 9515-9523.

膜类型	COD去除率/%	NH₃-H去除率/%	总氮去除率/%	水力停留时间/h	浊度/NTU	参考文献
纯膜
尼龙网（孔径74μm）	89.6±3.7	N.A.	N.A.	8.6	0.8	Wang 等^[30]
中空纤维膜	＞95.0	＞95	36%	6.4	N.A.	Tian等^[23]
中空纤维膜	＞97.0	＞99.9	86±2	24.0	N.A.	Gajaraj等^[9]
膜阴极
不锈钢网（孔径40μm）	90.7±6.6	92.7 ± 6.0	29.3 ± 4.3	4.5	0.8	Wang 等^[15]
不锈钢网（孔径40μm）	86.6±2.9	97.8 ± 0.9	37.0±11.2	9.1	0.8	Wang 等^[15]
聚吡咯/茜素红/不锈钢网（15μm）	＞95.0	＞95.0	N.A.	9.6	＜2	Li等^[32]
导电曝气膜	94.74	80.82	80.8	12.0	N.A.	Wu等^[38]
MnO₂/PVDF/还原氧化石墨/碳毡	＞97.0	＞90.6	N.A.	12.0	N.A.	Gao等^[31]
催化碳纤维	＞97.4	＞96.7	N.A.	8.0	N.A.	Gao等^[39]
膜空气阴极
无纺布（50μm）/石墨毡	87.4～91.2	69.5～97.6	23.1～57.2	1.6～14.5	＜2	Wang等^[27]

膜类型	COD去除率/%	NH₃-H去除率/%	总氮去除率/%	水力停留时间/h	浊度/NTU	参考文献
纯膜
尼龙网（孔径74μm）	89.6±3.7	N.A.	N.A.	8.6	0.8	Wang 等^[30]
中空纤维膜	＞95.0	＞95	36%	6.4	N.A.	Tian等^[23]
中空纤维膜	＞97.0	＞99.9	86±2	24.0	N.A.	Gajaraj等^[9]
膜阴极
不锈钢网（孔径40μm）	90.7±6.6	92.7 ± 6.0	29.3 ± 4.3	4.5	0.8	Wang 等^[15]
不锈钢网（孔径40μm）	86.6±2.9	97.8 ± 0.9	37.0±11.2	9.1	0.8	Wang 等^[15]
聚吡咯/茜素红/不锈钢网（15μm）	＞95.0	＞95.0	N.A.	9.6	＜2	Li等^[32]
导电曝气膜	94.74	80.82	80.8	12.0	N.A.	Wu等^[38]
MnO₂/PVDF/还原氧化石墨/碳毡	＞97.0	＞90.6	N.A.	12.0	N.A.	Gao等^[31]
催化碳纤维	＞97.4	＞96.7	N.A.	8.0	N.A.	Gao等^[39]
膜空气阴极
无纺布（50μm）/石墨毡	87.4～91.2	69.5～97.6	23.1～57.2	1.6～14.5	＜2	Wang等^[27]

[1]	张祚群, 高扬, 白超杰, 薛立新. 二次界面聚合同步反扩散原位生长ZIF-8纳米粒子制备聚酰胺混合基质反渗透（RO）膜[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 364-373.
[2]	潘宜昌, 周荣飞, 邢卫红. 高效分离同碳数烃的先进微孔膜：现状与挑战[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3926-3942.
[3]	王报英, 王皝莹, 闫军营, 汪耀明, 徐铜文. 聚合物包覆膜在金属分离回收中的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3990-4004.
[4]	李雪佳, 李鹏, 李志霞, 晋墩尚, 郭强, 宋旭锋, 宋芃, 彭跃莲. 亲水和疏水改性膜的抗结垢和润湿能力的对比[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4458-4464.
[5]	徐杰, 夏隆博, 罗平, 邹栋, 仲兆祥. 面向膜蒸馏过程的全疏膜制备及其应用进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3943-3955.
[6]	陆诗建, 刘苗苗, 杨菲, 张俊杰, 陈思铭, 刘玲, 康国俊, 李清方. 改良型CO₂湿壁塔内气液两相流动规律及传质特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3457-3467.
[7]	冯江涵, 宋钫. 阴离子交换膜电解池的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3501-3509.
[8]	陈香李, 李倩倩, 张甜, 李彪, 李康康. 自愈合油水分离膜的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3600-3610.
[9]	陈娜, 张肖静, 张楠, 马冰冰, 张涵, 杨浩洁, 张宏忠. 淬灭酶对亚硝化-混合自养脱氮系统的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3816-3823.
[10]	鲁少杰, 刘佳, 冀芊竹, 李萍, 韩月阳, 陶敏, 梁文俊. 硅藻土基复合填料制备及滴滤塔去除二甲苯的性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3884-3892.
[11]	李白雪, 信欣, 朱羽蒙, 刘琴, 刘鑫. SASD-A体系构建及进水不同S/N对脱氮工艺的影响机制[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3261-3271.
[12]	任重远, 何金龙, 袁清. 分子筛膜晶间缺陷控制与修复技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2454-2463.
[13]	王林, 辛梅华, 李明春, 陈琦, 毛扬帆. 季铵化/磺化壳聚糖的制备及其抗生物被膜活性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2577-2585.
[14]	于捷, 张文龙. 锂离子电池隔膜的发展现状与进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1760-1768.
[15]	赵珍珍, 郑喜, 王雪琪, 王涛, 冯英楠, 任永胜, 赵之平. 聚酰胺复合膜微孔支撑基底的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1917-1933.