府谷煤CO2催化气化反应性的研究

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2016.11.016

化工进展 ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 3491-3497.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2016.11.016

府谷煤CO₂催化气化反应性的研究

闫小霞, 付柯, 许晓宇, 徐龙, 马晓迅

陕北能源先进化工利用技术教育部工程研究中心, 陕西省洁净煤转化工程技术研究中心, 西安市能源高效清洁化工利用工程实验室, 西北大学化工学院, 陕西西安 710069

收稿日期:2016-03-09 修回日期:2016-05-30 出版日期:2016-11-05 发布日期:2016-11-05
通讯作者: 徐龙,教授。E-mail:longxuxulong@163.com。
作者简介:闫小霞(1991-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为煤催化气化。E-mail:740923076@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目（21536009）、国家科技部国际科技合作专项子课题（S2013GR0064）及西安市科技计划项目（CXY1511（4））。

Study of Fugu coal catalytic gasification in CO₂ atmosphere

YAN Xiaoxia, FU Ke, XU Xiaoyu, XU Long, MA Xiaoxun

Chemical Engineering Research Center of the Ministry of Education for Advanced Use Technology of Shanbei Energy, Shaanxi Research Center of Engineering Technology for Clean Coal Conversion, Xi'an Engineering Laboratory for Energy Efficient and Clean Chemical Utilization, College of Chemical Engineering, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, Shaanxi, China

Received:2016-03-09 Revised:2016-05-30 Online:2016-11-05 Published:2016-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 加入适宜的催化剂可以提高气化反应速率，降低起始气化温度。为了研究不同阴离子（SO₄^2-、CO₃^2-、Cl^-）盐对府谷煤热失重过程的影响，利用热重分析仪对负载了8种催化剂（K₂CO₃、K₂SO₄、KCl；Na₂CO₃、Na₂SO₄、NaCl；FeSO₄、FeCl₂）的煤样进行了CO₂气化实验，其中每克府谷煤的K⁺、Na⁺、Fe²⁺负载量分别为0.001mol。同时采用升温动力学模型进行了数据拟合。实验结果表明：催化剂对煤与CO₂的低温热解并无明显的催化作用，而在高温气化阶段催化效果显著。对于钾盐和钠盐催化剂，当阳离子相同时，其催化活性顺序为：CO₃^2->SO₄^2->Cl^-。对于铁盐催化剂，FeSO₄的催化活性优于FeCl₂。动力学结果发现：负载催化剂煤样的活化能大小符合上述实验规律，分布在169～232.6kJ/mol之间，相比原煤（267.9kJ/mol）都有一定程度的降低。

关键词: 煤催化气化, CO₂气氛, 动力学

Abstract: Adding appropriate proportion of catalysts can improve the coal gasification rate and reduce the initial gasification temperature．In order to study the effect of different anions (CO₃^2-、SO₄^2-、Cl^-) salts on the thermal weight loss process of FG coal, the CO₂ gasification experiments of coal were conducted in a thermogravimetric analyzer by loading eight kinds of catalysts (K₂CO₃, K₂SO₄, KCl;Na₂CO₃, Na₂SO₄, NaCl;FeSO₄, FeCl₂).And the loading amount of K⁺、Na⁺、Fe²⁺was 0.001 mol/g, respectively．In addition, the non-isothermal dynamic model was used to fit data．The experiment results showed that the catalysts exhibit weaker effect on coal-CO₂ low-temperature pyrolysis, while the catalysis was obvious in high-temperature gasification．For potassium and sodium salts, when kations were the same, the activity order was CO₃^2-＞SO₄^2-＞Cl^-．For the iron catalysts, the FeSO₄was observed to be superior to FeCl₂in catalyzing gasification．The dynamics results indicated that the apparent activation energy of coal with catalysts within the range of 169～232.6kJ/mol was consisted with the above rules．It was reduced in different degree compared to that of raw coal (267.9kJ/mol).

Key words: coal catalytic gasification, CO₂ atmosphere, kinetic

中图分类号:

TQ546.2

闫小霞, 付柯, 许晓宇, 徐龙, 马晓迅. 府谷煤CO₂催化气化反应性的研究[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(11): 3491-3497.

YAN Xiaoxia, FU Ke, XU Xiaoyu, XU Long, MA Xiaoxun. Study of Fugu coal catalytic gasification in CO₂ atmosphere[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2016, 35(11): 3491-3497.

参考文献

[1] 孟磊,周敏,王芬.煤催化气化催化剂研究进展[J].煤气与热力,2010,30(4):18-22.
[2] 庞克亮,向文国,赵长遂,等.钾盐对煤焦-CO₂汽化反应特性的影响[J].燃烧科学与技术,2007,13(1):63-66.
[3] 马燕星,刘艳,马晓迅,等.碱金属类催化剂对煤-CO₂气化行为的催化作用研究[D].西安:西北大学,2010.
[4] 高攀,顾松园,钟思青.小型固定床煤催化气化动力学研究[J].天然气化工(C1化学与化工),2015,40(3):45-48.
[5] WANG Jie,JIANG Mingquan,YAO Yihong,et al.Steam gasification of coal char catalyzed by K₂CO₃for enhanced production of hydrogen without formation of methane[J].Fuel,2009(88):1572-1579.
[6] YAW D Y,XU Y,ATUL S,et al.Catalytic gasification of coal using eutectic salts:identification of eutectics[J].Carbon,2003,41(2):203-214.
[7] ZHANG Y,HARA S,KAJITANI S,et al.Modeling of catalytic gasification kinetics of coal char and carbon[J].Fuel,2010,89(1):152-157.
[8] 段伦博,赵长遂,周骛,等.CO₂气氛对烟煤热解过程的影响[J].中国电机工程学报,2010,30(2):62-66.
[9] 赵宏斌.陕北府谷煤热解行为研究[D].西安:西北大学,2012.
[10] 夏鲲鹏.高温高压下煤的热解及气化特性的实验研究[D].湖北:华中科技大学,2006.
[11] 谢克昌.煤的结构与反应性[M].北京:科学出版社,2002:394-395.
[12] 杨景标,蔡宁生.应用TG-FTIR联用研究催化剂对煤热解的影响[J].燃料化学学报,2006,34(6):650-654.
[13] 朱廷钰,王洋.氧化铁与碳酸钾对煤温和气化的影响[J].化学反应工程与工艺,2000,16(2):203-207.
[14] LI C Z,SATHE C,KERSHAW J R,et al.Fates and roles of alkali and alkaline earth metals during the pyrolysis of a victorian brown coal[J].Fuel,2000,79(3/4):427-438.
[15] YE D P,AGNEW J B,ZHANG D K.Gasification of a South Australian low-rank coal with carbon dioxide and steam:kinetics and reactivity studies[J].Fuel,1998,77(11):1209-1219.
[16] SCHAFER H N S.Pyrolysis of brown coal.1.Decomposition of acid groups in coals containing carboxyl groups in the acid and cation forms[J].Fuel,1979,58(9):667-672.
[17] SCHAFER H N S.Pyrolysis of brown coals.2.Decomposition of acidic groups on heating in the range 100-900℃[J].Fuel,1979,58(9):673-679.
[18] YAMASHITA H,TOMITA A.Local structures of metals dispersed on coal.5.Effect of coal,Catalyst precursor,and catalyst preparation method on the structure of iron species during heat treatment and steam gasification[J].Ind. Eng. Chem. Res,1993,32:409-415.
[19] OHTSUKA Y,ASAMI K.Steam gasification of low-rank coals with a chlorine-free iron catalyst from ferric chloride[J].Ind. Eng. Chem. Res,199l,30:l921-1926.
[20] MOULIJN J A,CERFONTAIN M B,KAPTEIJN F.Mechanism of the potassium catalysed gasification of carbon in CO₂[J].Fuel,1984,63(8):1043-1047.
[21] HAMIHON R,SAMS T,SHADMAN D A.Variation of rate during potassium-catalyzed CO₂ gasification of coal char[J].Fuel,1984,63(7):1008-1012.
[22] OHTSUKA Y,TAMAI Y,TOMITA A.Iron-catalyzed gasification of brown coal at low temperatures[J].Energy & Fuels,1987,1:32-36.
[23] OHTSUKA Y,AASMI K.Highly active catalysts from inexpensive raw materials for coal gasification[J].Catalyst Today,1997,39:111-125.
[24] SANCIER K M,WOOD B J.The mechanism of the catalytic gasification of coal char:a critical review[J].Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng.,1984,26(2):233-279.
[25] 周志杰,范晓雷,张薇,等.非等温热重分析研究煤焦气化动力学[J].煤炭学报,2006,31(2):219-222.
[26] 罗鸣,张建民,高梅杉,等.不同方法求取活性焦气化反应动力学参数比较[J].上海理工大学学报,2006,21(2):136-140.
[27] 周建明,公旭中,王永刚,等.煤焦-CO₂气化反应性及其动力学模型[J].中国煤炭,2005,31(5):52-54.
[28] KASAOKA S,SAKATA Y,TONG C.Kinetic evaluation of reactivity of various coal chars for gasification with carbon dioxide in comparison with steam[J].International Chemical Engineering,1984,25(1):160-175.
[29] LANG R J.Anion effects in alkali-catalyzed steam gasification[J].Fuel,1986,65(10):1324-1329.

府谷煤CO₂催化气化反应性的研究

Study of Fugu coal catalytic gasification in CO₂ atmosphere

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	顾永正, 张永生. HBr改性飞灰对Hg⁰的动态吸附及动力学模型[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 498-509.
[2]	汪鹏, 张洋, 范兵强, 何登波, 申长帅, 张贺东, 郑诗礼, 邹兴. 高碳铬铁盐酸浸出过程工艺及动力学[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 510-517.
[3]	刘阳, 王云刚, 修浩然, 邹立, 白彦渊. 基于动力学分析的核桃壳最佳炭化工艺[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 94-103.
[4]	黄益平, 李婷, 郑龙云, 戚傲, 陈政霖, 史天昊, 张新宇, 郭凯, 胡猛, 倪泽雨, 刘辉, 夏苗, 主凯, 刘春江. 三级环流反应器中气液流动与传质规律[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 175-188.
[5]	董佳宇, 王斯民. 超声强化对二甲苯结晶特性及调控机理实验[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4504-4513.
[6]	王俊杰, 潘艳秋, 牛亚宾, 俞路. 分子水平催化重整装置模型构建及应用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3404-3412.
[7]	赵毅, 杨臻, 张新为, 王刚, 杨旋. 不同裂缝损伤和愈合温度条件下沥青自愈合行为的分子模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3147-3156.
[8]	曾天续, 张永显, 严渊, 刘宏, 马娇, 党鸿钟, 吴新波, 李维维, 陈永志. 羟胺对硝化菌活性及其动力学参数的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3272-3280.
[9]	李瑞东, 黄辉, 同国虎, 王跃社. 原油精馏塔中铵盐吸湿特性及其腐蚀行为[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2809-2818.
[10]	张成松, 张静, 龚斌, 李明洋, 袁佳新, 李宏业. 自吸射流柔性搅拌桨振动特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1728-1738.
[11]	葛伟童, 廖亚龙, 李明原, 嵇广雄, 郗家俊. Pd-Fe/MWCNTs双金属催化剂制备及其脱氯动力学[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1885-1894.
[12]	李芸, 崔楠, 熊星星, 黄志远, 王东亮, 许丹, 李军, 李泽兵. 稀土Er(Ⅲ)对短程硝化性能的影响及其抑制动力学特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1659-1668.
[13]	王唯, 张东旭, 李遵照, 王晓霖, 黄启玉. 油包水乳状液体系中水合物生长行为研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1155-1166.
[14]	闫兴清, 戴行涛, 喻健良, 李岳, 韩冰, 胡军. 高压氢气泄漏射流研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1118-1128.
[15]	宋叶, 陈玉卓, 宋云彩, 冯杰. 有机固废合成气原位净化催化剂设计及反应器分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1383-1396.