高压氢气泄漏射流研究进展

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-1008

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

叙述了高压氢气泄漏射流研究进展，重点对氢气状态方程、欠膨胀射流结构及模型、射流区域氢气浓度预测、基于计算流体动力学的泄漏射流模拟等方面进行了归纳、总结和评述，并对未来研究方向进行了展望。文中总结：现有研究表明已有多种适用于高压氢气的实际状态方程，Peng-Robinson、Abel-Noble等方程兼具便捷性及精度；高压氢气泄漏时在泄漏口呈现高度欠膨胀射流结构，Molkov模型可用于预测欠膨胀射流特性参数；高压氢气泄漏射流区为动量控制或动量与浮力联合控制，区域内氢气浓度与泄漏口径、泄漏口距离、介质密度组成的量纲为1参数有量化关系；主流计算流体动力学软件如ANSYS-Fluent、FLACS等在模拟高压氢气泄漏时均被证实具有较好精度。未来研究方向包括大尺度实验、不规则泄漏口、成果工程化应用以及高效数值模拟方法等。

关键词: 氢, 安全, 泄漏, 射流, 计算流体动力学

Abstract:

The research progress of high-pressure hydrogen leakage and jet flow was described. The aspects of real state of equation of hydrogen, the structure and model of high pressure under-expanded jet, the hydrogen concentration distribution of jet flow region, and the numerical simulation based on the computational fluid dynamics are concluded, summarized, and reviewed. The research direction in the future is raised. The existing research shows that there are several real gas state equations for high pressure hydrogen. The state equations of Peng-Robinson, Abel-Noble etc. are convenient and accurate. Highly under-expanded jet flow is formed during high pressure hydrogen releases, and Molkov model can be used to predict the characteristics of under-expanded jet flow. The jet flow region is controlled by momentum or the combination of momentum and buoyancy. The concentration of hydrogen in jet flow region is quantitatively related by the dimensionless parameter formed by release diameter, distance from release orifice, and medium densities. The common computational fluid dynamic software such as ANSYS-Fluent, FLACS etc. used in high pressure hydrogen release have been verified to have good precision. The future directions include large scale experiments, irregular release orifices, engineering applications of research results, and high efficient numerical methods.

Key words: hydrogen, safety, leakage, jet flow, computational fluid dynamics (CFD)

中图分类号:

X931

闫兴清, 戴行涛, 喻健良, 李岳, 韩冰, 胡军. 高压氢气泄漏射流研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1118-1128.

YAN Xingqing, DAI Xingtao, YU Jianliang, LI Yue, HAN Bing, HU Jun. Research progress of high-pressure hydrogen leakage and jet flow[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(3): 1118-1128.

图/表 13

参考文献 91

1	CHAPMAN Andrew, ITAOKA Kenshi, Hadi FARABI-ASL, et al. Societal penetration of hydrogen into the future energy system: impacts of policy, technology and carbon targets[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(7): 3883-3898.
2	FIELD R A, DERWENT R G. Global warming consequences of replacing natural gas with hydrogen in the domestic energy sectors of future low-carbon economies in the United Kingdom and the United States of America[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(58): 30190-30203.
3	Benjamin LUX, PFLUGER Benjamin. A supply curve of electricity-based hydrogen in a decarbonized European energy system in 2050[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 269: 115011.
4	OZAWA Akito, KUDOH Yuki, MURATA Akinobu, et al. Hydrogen in low-carbon energy systems in Japan by 2050: the uncertainties of technology development and implementation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(39): 18083-18094.
5	周颖, 周红军, 徐春明. 氢能的思考及发展路径判断和实践[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(8): 4587-4592.
	ZHOU Ying, ZHOU Hongjun, XU Chunming. Exploration of the development path for the hydrogen energy[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(8): 4587-4592.
6	国家发展与改革委员会, 国家能源局. 氢能产业发展中长期规划（2021—2035）[R]. 2022.
	National Development and Reform Commission, National Energy Administration. Medium and long planning for the development of hydrogen energy industry（2021—2035）[R]. 2022.
7	ARSAD A Z, HANNAN M A, AL-SHETWI A Q, et al. Hydrogen energy storage integrated hybrid renewable energy systems: a review analysis for future research directions[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(39): 17285-17312.
8	TARHAN Cevahir, ÇIL Mehmet Ali. A study on hydrogen, the clean energy of the future: hydrogen storage methods[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2021, 40: 102676.
9	ZHENG Jinyang, LIU Xianxin, XU Ping, et al. Development of high pressure gaseous hydrogen storage technologies[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(1): 1048-1057.
10	邝辰, 刘迪, 杨昊, 等. 氢气泄漏后燃爆风险研究现状综述[J]. 安全、健康和环境, 2021, 21(9): 1-5.
	KUANG Chen, LIU Di, YANG Hao, et al. Review on research status of combustion and explosion risk after hydrogen leakage[J]. Safety Health & Environment, 2021, 21(9): 1-5.
11	WEST Madison, Ahmad AL-DOURI, HARTMANN Kevin, et al. Critical review and analysis of hydrogen safety data collection tools[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(40): 17845-17858.
12	郑津洋, 张俊峰, 陈霖新, 等. 氢安全研究现状[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2016, 16(6): 144-152.
	ZHENG Jinyang, ZHANG Junfeng, CHEN Linxin, et al. Research status in situ of hydrogen safety[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2016, 16(6): 144-152.
13	汪志雷, 潘旭海, 蒋军成. 高压氢气泄漏自燃研究进展[J]. 南京工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(5): 656-663.
	WANG Zhilei, PAN Xuhai, JIANG Juncheng. Research challenges in high-pressure hydrogen spontaneous ignition[J]. Journal of Nanjing Tech University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 41(5): 656-663.
14	YANG Fuyuan, WANG Tianze, DENG Xintao, et al. Review on hydrogen safety issues: Incident statistics, hydrogen diffusion, and detonation process[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(61): 31467-31488.
15	LI Hao, CAO Xuewen, LIU Yang, et al. Safety of hydrogen storage and transportation: an overview on mechanisms, techniques, and challenges[J]. Energy Reports, 2022, 8: 6258-6269.
16	沈晓波, 章雪凝, 刘海峰. 高压氢气泄漏相关安全问题研究与进展[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(3): 1217-1229.
	SHEN Xiaobo, ZHANG Xuening, LIU Haifeng. Research and progress on safety issues related to high-pressure hydrogen leakage[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(3): 1217-1229.
17	EKOTO I W, MERILO E G, DEDRICK D E, et al. Performance-based testing for hydrogen leakage into passenger vehicle compartments[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(16): 10169-10178.
18	徐钟平, 周敏莉, 虞利强, 等. 燃料电池汽车及氢能源的发展现状与安全对策[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2010, 29(11): 1019-1021.
	XU Zhongping, ZHOU Minli, YU Liqiang, et al. Present situation and safety measures of fuel cell powered vehicle and hydrogen energy source[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2010, 29(11): 1019-1021.
19	Hye Ri GYE, SEO Seung Kwon, BACH Quang Vu, et al. Quantitative risk assessment of an urban hydrogen refueling station[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(2): 1288-1298.
20	SUZUKI Tomoya, SHIOTA Kento, IZATO Yu Ichiro, et al. Quantitative risk assessment using a Japanese hydrogen refueling station model[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(11): 8329-8343.
21	ZHAO Mingbin, HUANG Teng, LIU Chenhui, et al. Leak localization using distributed sensors and machine learning for hydrogen releases from a fuel cell vehicle in a parking garage[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(1): 1420-1433.
22	李云浩, 喻源, 张庆武. 车库内氢气扩散和分布状态的数值模拟[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2017, 17(5): 1884-1889.
	LI Yunhao, YU Yuan, ZHANG Qingwu. Numerical simulation for the hydrogen dispersion and distribution behaviors in the garage context[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2017, 17(5): 1884-1889.
23	KUDRIAKOV S, STUDER E, BERNARD-MICHEL G, et al. Full-scale tunnel experiments: blast wave and fireball evolution following hydrogen tank rupture[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(43): 18911-18933.
24	WU Y. Assessment of the impact of jet flame hazard from hydrogen cars in road tunnels[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2008, 16(2): 246-254.
25	张来斌, 胡瑾秋, 张曦月, 等. 氢能制-储-运安全与应急保障技术现状与发展趋势[J]. 石油科学通报, 2021, 6(2): 167-180.
	ZHANG Laibin, HU Jinqiu, ZHANG Xiyue, et al. Research status and development trends of safety and emergency guarantee technology for production, storage and transportation of hydrogen[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2021, 6(2): 167-180.
26	王振华, 蒋军成, 尤飞, 等. 高压氢气储运设施泄漏喷射火过程预测模型及其验证[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(10): 5412-5423.
	WANG Zhenhua, JIANG Juncheng, YOU Fei, et al. Prediction model for the process of jet fire induced by the leakage of high-pressure hydrogen storage and transportation facilities and its validation[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(10): 5412-5423.
27	MÜLLER E A, GUBBINS K E. Molecular-based equations of state for associating fluids: a review of SAFT and related approaches[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2001, 40(10): 2193-2211.
28	LEACHMAN J W, JACOBSEN R T, PENONCELLO S G, et al. Fundamental equations of state for parahydrogen, normal hydrogen, and orthohydrogen[J]. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 2009, 38(3): 721-748.
29	YOUNGLOVE B A. Erratum: thermophysical properties of fluids. I. Argon, ethylene, parahydrogen, nitrogen, nitrogen trifluoride, and oxygen[J]. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 1985, 14(2): 619.
30	SOAVE Giorgio. Equilibrium constants from a modified Redlich-Kwong equation of state[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1972, 27(6): 1197-1203.
31	PENG Dingyu, ROBINSON Donald B. A new two-constant equation of state[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 1976, 15(1): 59-64.
32	CHENOWETH D R. Gas-transfer analysis. Section H-real gas results via the Van der Waals equation of state and virial expansion extension of its limiting Abel-Noble form[R]. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), 1983.
33	ISHII R, FUJIMOTO H, HATTA N, et al. Experimental and numerical analysis of circular pulse jets[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1999, 392: 129-153.
34	DULOV V G, LUK’YANOV G A. Gas dynamics of outflow processes[M]. Novosibirsk: Nauka Press, 1984: 50.
35	PANDA J, SEASHOLTZ R G. Measurement of shock structure and shock-vortex interaction in underexpanded jets using Rayleigh scattering[J]. Physics of Fluids, 1999, 11(12): 3761-3777.
36	ALKISLAR M B, KROTHAPALLI A, LOURENCO L M. Structure of a screeching rectangular jet: a stereoscopic particle image velocimetry study[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2003, 489: 121-154.
37	RUGGLES A J, EKOTO I W. Ignitability and mixing of underexpanded hydrogen jets[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(22): 17549-17560.
38	RUGGLES A J, EKOTO I W. Experimental investigation of nozzle aspect ratio effects on underexpanded hydrogen jet release characteristics[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(35): 20331-20338.
39	Benoît ANDRÉ, CASTELAIN Thomas, BAILLY Christophe. Investigation of the mixing layer of underexpanded supersonic jets by particle image velocimetry[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2014, 50: 188-200.
40	Benoît ANDRÉ, CASTELAIN Thomas, BAILLY Christophe. Experimental exploration of underexpanded supersonic jets[J]. Shock Waves, 2014, 24(1): 21-32.
41	李雪芳, 何倩, 柯道友, 等. 高压氢气小孔泄漏射流分层流动模型与验证[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 58(12): 1095-1100.
	LI Xuefang, HE Qian, CHRISTOPHER D M, et al. Validation of flow partitioning model for high pressure hydrogen jets through small orifices[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2018, 58(12): 1095-1100.
42	BIRCH A D, BROWN D R, DODSON M G, et al. The structure and concentration decay of high pressure jets of natural gas[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 1984, 36(5/6): 249-261.
43	BIRCH A D, HUGHES D J, SWAFFIELD F. Velocity decay of high pressure jets[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 1987, 52(1/2/3): 161-171.
44	EWAN B C R, MOODIE K. Structure and velocity measurements in underexpanded jets[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 1986, 45(5/6): 275-288.
45	YÜCEIL K B, ÖTÜGEN M V. Scaling parameters for underexpanded supersonic jets[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2002, 14(12): 4206-4215.
46	SCHEFER R W, HOUF W G, WILLIAMS T C, et al. Characterization of high-pressure, underexpanded hydrogen-jet flames[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(12): 2081-2093.
47	MOLKOV V, MAKAROV D, BRAGIN M. Physics and modelling of underexpanded jets and hydrogen dispersion in atmosphere[M]. Physics of Extreme States of Matter. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences, 2009: 146-149.
48	MOLKOV Vladimir, SAFFERS Jean-bernard. The correlation for non-premixed hydrogen jet flame length in still air[C]//SPEARPOINT M. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Fire Safety Science. Maryland, USA, International Association for Fire Safety Science: 2011: 933-944.
49	李雪芳, 毕景良, 柯道友. 高压氢气储存系统泄漏的热力学模型[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 53(4): 503-508.
	LI Xuefang, BI Jingliang, CHRISTOPHER David M. Thermodynamic models of leaks from high-pressure hydrogen storage systems[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2013, 53(4): 503-508.
50	柯道友, 毕景良, 李雪芳. 氢气泄漏过程的理论模型计算及CFD模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(9): 3088-3095.
	CHRISTOPHER David M, BI Jingliang, LI Xuefang. Integral model and CFD simulations for hydrogen leaks[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(9): 3088-3095.
51	RICOU F P, SPALDING D B. Measurements of entrainment by axisymmetrical turbulent jets[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1961, 11(1): 21-32.
52	CHEN C J, RODI W. Vertical turbulent buoyant jets: a review of experimental data[M]. Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press, 1980, 94-99.
53	HOUF W, SCHEFER R. Analytical and experimental investigation of small-scale unintended releases of hydrogen[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(4): 1435-1444.
54	CHAINEAUX J, MAVROTHALASSITIS G, PINEAU J. Modelization and validation of the discharge in air of a vessel pressurized by flammable gas[J]. Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1991, 134: 104-137.
55	RUFFIN E, MOUILLEAU Y, CHAINEAUX J. Large scale characterization of the concentration field of supercritical jets of hydrogen and methane[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 1996, 9(4): 279-284.
56	OKABAYASHI K, NONAKA T, SAKATA N, et al. Characteristics of dispersion for leakage of high-pressurized hydrogen gas[J]. Japan Society for Safety Engineering, 2005, 44: 391-397.
57	ROBERTS P T, SHIRVILL L C, ROBERTS T A, et al. Dispersion of hydrogen from high-pressure sources[C]//PANTONY M F. Proceedings of the IChemE Symposium Hazards XIX. Manchester, UK: Institution of Chemical Engineers, 2006, 151:1-12.
58	KUZNETSOV M, Hydrogen distribution tests in free turbulent jet[R]. SBEP V4. NoReport.: SBEP V4, 2007.
59	VESER A, KUZNETSOV M, FAST G, et al. The structure and flame propagation regimes in turbulent jets[C]//Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Hydrogen Safety, Ajaccio, France: 2009.
60	MOLKOV V, BRAGIN M, BRENNAN S, et al. Hydrogen safety engineering: overview of recent progress and unresolved issues[C]//Proceedings of the International Congress on Combustion and Fire Dynamics, Santander, Spain, 2010.
61	GALLEGO E, MIGOYA E, MARTÍN-VALDEPEÑAS J M, et al. An intercomparison exercise on the capabilities of CFD models to predict distribution and mixing of H₂ in a closed vessel[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(13): 2235-2245.
62	VENETSANOS A G, PAPANIKOLAOU E, DELICHATSIOS M, et al. An inter-comparison exercise on the capabilities of CFD models to predict the short and long term distribution and mixing of hydrogen in a garage[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(14): 5912-5923.
63	OLVERA H A, CHOUDHURI A R. Numerical simulation of hydrogen dispersion in the vicinity of a cubical building in stable stratified atmospheres[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2006, 31(15): 2356-2369.
64	HEITSCH M, BARALDI D, MORETTO P. Numerical analysis of accidental hydrogen release in a laboratory[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(9): 4409-4419.
65	MIDDHA P, HANSEN O R, GRUNE J, et al. CFD calculations of gas leak dispersion and subsequent gas explosions: validation against ignited impinging hydrogen jet experiments[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 179(1/2/3): 84-94.
66	SULLY A, HEITSCH M, BARALDI D, et al. Numerical simulations of hydrogen and hydrogen chloride releases in a nuclear hydrogen production facility[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(1): 1083-1093.
67	SALVA José Antonio, TAPIA Elvira, IRANZO Alfredo, et al. Safety study of a hydrogen leak in a fuel cell vehicle using computational fluid dynamics[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(6): 5299-5306.
68	HAN Sang Heon, CHANG Daejun, KIM Jong Soo. Release characteristics of highly pressurized hydrogen through a small hole[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(8): 3503-3512.
69	CHOI Jongrak, Nahmkeon HUR, KANG Seongwon, et al. A CFD simulation of hydrogen dispersion for the hydrogen leakage from a fuel cell vehicle in an underground parking garage[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(19): 8084-8091.
70	HAJJI Yassine, JOUINI Belgacem, BOUTERAA Mourad, et al. Numerical study of hydrogen release accidents in a residential garage[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(31): 9747-9759.
71	KEENAN J J, MAKAROV D V, MOLKOV V V. Modelling and simulation of high-pressure hydrogen jets using notional nozzle theory and open source code OpenFOAM[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(11): 7447-7456.
72	HAN Ukmin, Jinwoo OH, LEE Hoseong. Safety investigation of hydrogen charging platform package with CFD simulation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(29): 13687-13699.
73	LI Feng, YUAN Yupeng, YAN Xinping, et al. A study on a numerical simulation of the leakage and diffusion of hydrogen in a fuel cell ship[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 97: 177-185.
74	YU Xing, WANG Changjian, HE Qize. Numerical study of hydr ogen dispersion in a fuel cell vehicle under the effect of ambient wind[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(40): 22671-22680.
75	LIANG Yang, PAN Xiangmin, ZHANG Cunman, et al. The simulation and analysis of leakage and explosion at a renewable hydrogen refuelling station[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(40): 22608-22619.
76	HUSSEIN H, BRENNAN S, MOLKOV V. Dispersion of hydrogen release in a naturally ventilated covered car park[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(43): 23882-23897.
77	MALAKHOV A A, AVDEENKOV A V, DU TOIT M H, et al. CFD simulation and experimental study of a hydrogen leak in a semi-closed space with the purpose of risk mitigation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(15): 9231-9240.
78	AFGHAN HAJI ABBAS Mohammad, KHERADMAND Saeid, SADOUGHIPOUR Hossein. Numerical study of the effect of hydrogen leakage position and direction on hydrogen distribution in a closed enclosure[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(43): 23872-23881.
79	QIAN Jinyuan, LI Xiaojuan, GAO Zhixin, et al. A numerical study of hydrogen leakage and diffusion in a hydrogen refueling station[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(28): 14428-14439.
80	STEWART J R. CFD modelling of underexpanded hydrogen jets exiting rectangular shaped openings[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2020, 139: 283-296.
81	MAO Xiaobing, YING Rushun, YUAN Yupeng, et al. Simulation and analysis of hydrogen leakage and explosion behaviors in various compartments on a hydrogen fuel cell ship[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(9): 6857-6872.
82	PARK Byoungjik, KIM Yangkyun, PAIK Shinwon, et al. Numerical and experimental analysis of jet release and jet flame length for qualitative risk analysis at hydrogen refueling station[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 155: 145-154.
83	ZHANG Han, SAUERSCHELL Simon, BA Qingxin, et al. Numerical simulation of accidental released hazardous gas dispersion at a methanation plant using GASFLOW-MPI[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(2): 2804-2823.
84	LI Yabing, XIAO Jianjun, ZHANG Han, et al. Numerical analysis of hydrogen release, dispersion and combustion in a tunnel with fuel cell vehicles using all-speed CFD code GASFLOW-MPI[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(23): 12474-12486.
85	WANG Tianze, YANG Fuyuan, HU Qixiang, et al. Experimental and simulation research on hydrogen leakage of double ferrule joints[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2022, 160: 839-846.
86	GAO Qunxiang, WANG Laijun, PENG Wei, et al. Safety analysis of leakage in a nuclear hydrogen production system[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(7): 4916-4931.
87	HUANG Teng, ZHAO Mingbin, BA Qingxin, et al. Modeling of hydrogen dispersion from hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in an underground parking garage[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(1): 686-696.
88	DICKEN C J B, MÉRIDA W. Modeling the transient temperature distribution within a hydrogen cylinder during refueling[J]. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications, 2007, 53(7): 685-708.
89	SURYAN Abhilash, KIM Heuy Dong, SETOGUCHI Toshiaki. Three dimensional numerical computations on the fast filling of a hydrogen tank under different conditions[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(9): 7600-7611.
90	李雪芳. 储氢系统意外氢气泄漏和扩散研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2015.
	LI Xuefang. Dispersion of unintended subsonic and supersonic hydrogen releases from hydrogen storage systems[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2015.
91	ROTHUIZEN E, ELMEGAARD B, ROKNI M. Dynamic simulation of the effect of vehicle-side pressure loss of hydrogen fueling process[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(15): 9025-9038.

研究人员	p/MPa	T/K	d/mm	泄放流动状态	F_r数^①
Chaineaux等 ^[54]	3.6	207	6	临界	695
Chaineaux等 ^[54]	1.8	174	12	临界	591
Ruffin等 ^[55]	3.24	288	25	临界	343
	1.8	288	50	临界	281
	0.75	288	75	临界	286
	0.26	288	100	临界	321
Okabaysshi等 ^[56]	20	288	2	临界	783
	40	288	0.25	临界	1896
	40	288	0.5	临界	1341
	40	288	1	临界	948
	40	288	2	临界	670
Roberts等 ^[57]	10	287	3	临界	753
	13.5	287	3	临界	702
	2.5	287	12	临界	528
Kuznetsov等 ^[58]	16.1	287	0.25	临界	2324
	10.6	287	0.75	临界	1485
	9.7	287	1	临界	1314
	5.3	287	1	临界	1522
Veser等 ^[59]	5.43	298	1	临界	1511
	2.99	298	1	临界	1749
	1.01	298	2	临界	1622
	1.81	298	2	临界	1402

研究人员	p/MPa	T/K	d/mm	泄放流动状态	F_r数^①
Chaineaux等 ^[54]	3.6	207	6	临界	695
Chaineaux等 ^[54]	1.8	174	12	临界	591
Ruffin等 ^[55]	3.24	288	25	临界	343
	1.8	288	50	临界	281
	0.75	288	75	临界	286
	0.26	288	100	临界	321
Okabaysshi等 ^[56]	20	288	2	临界	783
	40	288	0.25	临界	1896
	40	288	0.5	临界	1341
	40	288	1	临界	948
	40	288	2	临界	670
Roberts等 ^[57]	10	287	3	临界	753
	13.5	287	3	临界	702
	2.5	287	12	临界	528
Kuznetsov等 ^[58]	16.1	287	0.25	临界	2324
	10.6	287	0.75	临界	1485
	9.7	287	1	临界	1314
	5.3	287	1	临界	1522
Veser等 ^[59]	5.43	298	1	临界	1511
	2.99	298	1	临界	1749
	1.01	298	2	临界	1622
	1.81	298	2	临界	1402

研究人员	模拟的泄漏场景	CFD软件平台	泄漏压力^①/MPa	泄漏温度/℃
Heitsch等（2010）^[64]	实验室内氢气瓶泄漏	ANSYS-CFX	20	15
Middha等（2010）^[65]	气瓶内氢气泄漏	FLACS	—	25
Sully等（2011）^[66]	核电站附近的制氢工厂管道泄漏	ANSYS-CFX	2.4	100
Salva等（2012）^[67]	燃料电池车氢气罐泄漏	ANSYS-Fluent	20	25
Han等（2013）^[68]	高压储氢容器泄漏	FLUENT	10~40	20
Choi等（2013）^[69]	地下车库氢燃料电池车氢气泄漏	STAR-CCM	—	25
Hajji等（2015）^[70]	车库内氢能源车泄漏	FLUENT	—	25
Keenan等（2017）^[71]	高压储氢容器泄漏	OpenFOAM	—	-34
Han等（2018）^[72]	氢气充装平台设备泄漏	FLUENT	1~90	-40~85
Li等（2018）^[73]	氢燃料电池船内氢气泄漏	FLUNET	10	27
Yu等（2019）^[74]	氢动力车辆气瓶泄漏	OpenFOAM	70	14.5
Liang等（2019）^[75]	加氢站内储氢罐泄漏	FLACS	20~90	25
Hussein等（2020）^[76]	停车场车载氢气瓶超压泄放装置泄漏	ANSYS-Fluent	70	25
Malakhov等（2020）^[77]	模拟巷道内氢气泄漏	STAR-CCM+	2	15
Afghan等（2020）^[78]	氢气向密闭罐内泄漏	FLUENT	—	20
Qian等（2020）^[79]	加氢站内氢气泄漏	ANSYS Fluent	40	25
Stewart等（2020）^[80]	高压氢气通过矩形孔泄漏	ANSYS-CFX	30	22
Mao等（2021）^[81]	氢燃料电池船内氢气泄漏	ANSYS-Fluent	—	27
Park等（2021）^[82]	加氢站内储氢设施泄漏	HyRAM	20~82	25
Zhang等（2021）^[83]	工厂反应器内含氢气体泄漏	GASFLOW-MPI	2.5	20
Li等（2021）^[84]	隧道内燃料电池车氢气泄漏	GASFLOW-MPI	70	15
Wang等（2022）^[85]	卡套接头氢气泄漏	ANSYS-Fluent	0.2	25
Gao等（2022）^[86]	核电站附近氢储罐泄漏	In:Flux	8	25
Huang等（2022）^[87]	地下停车场氢燃料电池车氢气泄漏	ANSYS-Fluent	—	25

研究人员	模拟的泄漏场景	CFD软件平台	泄漏压力^①/MPa	泄漏温度/℃
Heitsch等（2010）^[64]	实验室内氢气瓶泄漏	ANSYS-CFX	20	15
Middha等（2010）^[65]	气瓶内氢气泄漏	FLACS	—	25
Sully等（2011）^[66]	核电站附近的制氢工厂管道泄漏	ANSYS-CFX	2.4	100
Salva等（2012）^[67]	燃料电池车氢气罐泄漏	ANSYS-Fluent	20	25
Han等（2013）^[68]	高压储氢容器泄漏	FLUENT	10~40	20
Choi等（2013）^[69]	地下车库氢燃料电池车氢气泄漏	STAR-CCM	—	25
Hajji等（2015）^[70]	车库内氢能源车泄漏	FLUENT	—	25
Keenan等（2017）^[71]	高压储氢容器泄漏	OpenFOAM	—	-34
Han等（2018）^[72]	氢气充装平台设备泄漏	FLUENT	1~90	-40~85
Li等（2018）^[73]	氢燃料电池船内氢气泄漏	FLUNET	10	27
Yu等（2019）^[74]	氢动力车辆气瓶泄漏	OpenFOAM	70	14.5
Liang等（2019）^[75]	加氢站内储氢罐泄漏	FLACS	20~90	25
Hussein等（2020）^[76]	停车场车载氢气瓶超压泄放装置泄漏	ANSYS-Fluent	70	25
Malakhov等（2020）^[77]	模拟巷道内氢气泄漏	STAR-CCM+	2	15
Afghan等（2020）^[78]	氢气向密闭罐内泄漏	FLUENT	—	20
Qian等（2020）^[79]	加氢站内氢气泄漏	ANSYS Fluent	40	25
Stewart等（2020）^[80]	高压氢气通过矩形孔泄漏	ANSYS-CFX	30	22
Mao等（2021）^[81]	氢燃料电池船内氢气泄漏	ANSYS-Fluent	—	27
Park等（2021）^[82]	加氢站内储氢设施泄漏	HyRAM	20~82	25
Zhang等（2021）^[83]	工厂反应器内含氢气体泄漏	GASFLOW-MPI	2.5	20
Li等（2021）^[84]	隧道内燃料电池车氢气泄漏	GASFLOW-MPI	70	15
Wang等（2022）^[85]	卡套接头氢气泄漏	ANSYS-Fluent	0.2	25
Gao等（2022）^[86]	核电站附近氢储罐泄漏	In:Flux	8	25
Huang等（2022）^[87]	地下停车场氢燃料电池车氢气泄漏	ANSYS-Fluent	—	25

[1]	杨建平. 降低HPPO装置反应系统原料消耗的PSE[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 21-32.
[2]	时永兴, 林刚, 孙晓航, 蒋韦庚, 乔大伟, 颜彬航. 二氧化碳加氢制甲醇过程中铜基催化剂活性位点研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 287-298.
[3]	谢璐垚, 陈崧哲, 王来军, 张平. 用于SO₂去极化电解制氢的铂基催化剂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 299-309.
[4]	程涛, 崔瑞利, 宋俊男, 张天琪, 张耘赫, 梁世杰, 朴实. 渣油加氢装置杂质沉积规律与压降升高机理分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4616-4627.
[5]	葛全倩, 徐迈, 梁铣, 王凤武. MOFs材料在光电催化领域应用的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4692-4705.
[6]	史柯柯, 刘木子, 赵强, 李晋平, 刘光. 镁基储氢材料的性能及研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4731-4745.
[7]	刘木子, 史柯柯, 赵强, 李晋平, 刘光. 固体储氢材料的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4746-4769.
[8]	毛善俊, 王哲, 王勇. 基团辨识加氢：从概念到应用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3917-3922.
[9]	王兰江, 梁瑜, 汤琼, 唐明兴, 李学宽, 刘雷, 董晋湘. 快速热解铂前体合成高分散的Pt/HY催化剂及其萘深度加氢性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4159-4166.
[10]	张超, 杨鹏, 刘广林, 赵伟, 杨绪飞, 张伟, 宇波. 表面微结构对阵列微射流沸腾换热的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4193-4203.
[11]	郭晋, 张耕, 陈国华, 朱鸣, 谭粤, 李蔚, 夏莉, 胡昆. 车载液氢气瓶设计技术的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4221-4229.
[12]	张亚娟, 徐惠, 胡贝, 史星伟. 化学镀法制备NiCoP/rGO/NF高效电解水析氢催化剂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4275-4282.
[13]	王晓晗, 周亚松, 于志庆, 魏强, 孙劲晓, 姜鹏. 不同晶粒尺寸Y分子筛的合成及其加氢裂化反应性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4283-4295.
[14]	储甜甜, 刘润竹, 杜高华, 马嘉浩, 张孝阿, 王成忠, 张军营. 有机胍催化脱氢型RTV硅橡胶的制备和可降解性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3664-3673.
[15]	于姗, 段元刚, 张怡欣, 唐春, 付梦瑶, 黄靖元, 周莹. 分步法分解硫化氢制氢和硫黄催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3780-3790.