不同裂缝损伤和愈合温度条件下沥青自愈合行为的分子模拟

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-1520

化工进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 3147-3156.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-1520

不同裂缝损伤和愈合温度条件下沥青自愈合行为的分子模拟

赵毅¹^,²(), 杨臻³, 张新为⁴, 王刚⁴, 杨旋⁵

^1.重庆交通大学交通土建工程材料国家地方联合工程实验室，重庆 400074
^2.重庆交通大学材料科学与工程学院，重庆 400074
^3.重庆交通大学土木工程学院，重庆 400074
^4.中建路桥集团有限公司，河北石家庄 050001
^5.哈尔滨工业大学交通科学与工程学院，黑龙江哈尔滨 150090

收稿日期:2022-08-17 修回日期:2022-09-29 出版日期:2023-06-25 发布日期:2023-06-29
通讯作者: 赵毅
作者简介:赵毅（1980—），男，教授，硕士生导师，研究方向为高性能沥青材料。E-mail：1585513635@qq.com。
基金资助:
重庆市研究生联合培养基地建设项目(JDLHPYJD2021011);重庆交通大学交通土建工程材料国家地方联合工程实验室开放基金(LHSYS-2021-002);河北省交通运输厅科技项目(QC2018-3)

Molecular simulation of self-healing behavior of asphalt under different crack damage and healing temperature

ZHAO Yi¹^,²(), YANG Zhen³, ZHANG Xinwei⁴, WANG Gang⁴, YANG Xuan⁵

^1.National & Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Traffic Civil Engineering Materials, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
^2.School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
^3.School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
^4.CSCEC Road and Bridge Group Co. , Ltd. , Shijiazhuang 050001, Hebei, China
^5.School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, Heilongjiang, China

Received:2022-08-17 Revised:2022-09-29 Online:2023-06-25 Published:2023-06-29
Contact: ZHAO Yi

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究在不同裂缝损伤和愈合温度条件下沥青的自愈合行为，通过分子动力学（MD）方法构建沥青分子模型，模拟70^#基质沥青在温度313~333K、裂缝宽度10~50Å（1Å=0.1nm）条件下的自愈合行为，从沥青分子模型的密度、径向分布函数、玻璃化转变温度、内聚能密度以及溶解度参数验证了沥青分子模型的合理性；从定性（密度、均方位移）和定量（扩散系数、内聚能密度和自由体积分数）两个方面评价了沥青分子模型的自愈合性能。结果表明，自愈合温度为313~333K时，不同裂缝宽度的愈合模型内聚能密度波动范围在0.2%~3%，表明沥青分子的自愈合对该温度区间的温度变化不敏感；沥青分子模型裂缝宽度为30Å时，模型的愈合过程明显，且愈合效果也最好，推荐采用30Å作为70^#基质沥青愈合模型的裂缝宽度。

关键词: 沥青, 分子模拟, 动力学模型, 扩散, 内聚能密度

Abstract:

In order to study the self-healing behavior of asphalt under different crack damage and healing temperatures, a molecular model of asphalt was constructed by molecular dynamics (MD) method to simulate the self-healing behavior of 70^# matrix asphalt under the conditions of temperature 313—333K and crack width 10—50Å. The rationality of the asphalt molecular model was verified from the density of asphalt molecular model, radial distribution function, glass transition temperature, cohesive energy density and solubility parameters. The self-healing ability of asphalt molecular model was evaluated qualitatively (density and mean square displacement) and quantitatively (diffusion coefficient, cohesive energy density and free volume fraction). The results showed that when the self-healing temperature was 313—333K, the cohesive energy density of the healing models with different crack widths fluctuated in the range of 0.2%—3%, indicating that the self-healing of asphalt molecules was insensitive to the temperature change in this temperature range. When the crack width of asphalt molecular model was 30Å, the healing process of the model was obvious and the healing effect was also the best. It was recommended to use 30Å as the crack width of 70^# matrix asphalt healing model.

Key words: asphalt, molecular simulation, kinetic modeling, diffusion, cohesive energy density

中图分类号:

U416.21

赵毅, 杨臻, 张新为, 王刚, 杨旋. 不同裂缝损伤和愈合温度条件下沥青自愈合行为的分子模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3147-3156.

ZHAO Yi, YANG Zhen, ZHANG Xinwei, WANG Gang, YANG Xuan. Molecular simulation of self-healing behavior of asphalt under different crack damage and healing temperature[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(6): 3147-3156.

图/表 14

参考文献 38

1	XIANG Haonan, HE Zhaoyi, TANG Haojie, et al. Healing behavior of thermo-oxygen aged asphalt based on molecular dynamics simulations[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 349: 128740.
2	裴建新. 沥青裂缝自修复微胶囊的制备与表征[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(9): 2898-2904.
	PEI Jianxin. Preparation and properties of self-healing microcapsule for asphalt crack[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2016, 35(9): 2898-2904.
3	徐建平, 赵毅, 梁乃兴, 等. 基于疲劳累积损伤的高模量沥青路面使用寿命预估[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 38(2): 26-33.
	XU Jianping, ZHAO Yi, LIANG Naixing, et al. Life prediction of high modulus asphalt pavement based on fatigue cumulative damage[J]. Journal of Chang'an University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 38(2): 26-33.
4	SUN Daquan, SUN Guoqiang, ZHU Xingyi, et al. A comprehensive review on self-healing of asphalt materials: Mechanism, model, characterization and enhancement[J]. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2018, 256: 65-93.
5	HE Liang, LI Guannan, Songtao LYU, et al. Self-healing behavior of asphalt system based on molecular dynamics simulation[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 254: 119225.
6	GREENFIELD M L. Molecular modelling and simulation of asphaltenes and bituminous materials[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2011, 12(4): 325-341.
7	HALWACHI H K AL, YAKOVLEV D S, BOEK E S. Systematic optimization of asphaltene molecular structure and molecular weight using the quantitative molecular representation approach[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2012, 26(10): 6177-6185.
8	丁勇杰. 基于分子模拟技术的沥青化学结构特征研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2013.
	DING Yongjie. Study on chemical structure characteirstic of asphalt using molecular simulation[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2013.
9	何亮, 李冠男, 郑雨丰, 等. 沥青体系的分子动力学研究进展及展望[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(19): 19083-19093.
	HE Liang, LI Guannan, ZHENG Yufeng, et al. Research progress and prospect of molecular dynamics of asphalt systems[J]. Materials Review, 2020, 34(19): 19083-19093.
10	任瑞波, 薄剑, 赵品晖, 等. 沥青材料分子动力学模拟研究进展[J]. 山东建筑大学学报, 2020, 35(3): 61-68.
	REN Ruibo, BO Jian, ZHAO Pinhui, et al. Progress in molecular dynamics simulation of asphalt materials[J]. Journal of Shandong Jianzhu University, 2020, 35(3): 61-68.
11	QU Xin, LIU Quan, WANG Chao, et al. Effect of co-production of renewable biomaterials on the performance of asphalt binder in macro and micro perspectives[J]. Materials, 2018, 11(2): 244.
12	余可心, 孙国强, 孙大权. 基于分子动力学模拟的沥青-再生剂扩散研究进展[J]. 石油沥青, 2021, 35(2): 27-34.
	YU Kexin, SUN Guoqiang, SUN Daquan. Research progress of diffusion between asphalt and regenerant based on molecular dynamics simulation[J]. Petroleum Asphalt, 2021, 35(2): 27-34.
13	曹雪娟, 苏玥, 邓梅. 基于分子动力学模拟的聚合物改性剂与沥青相互作用研究[J]. 化工新型材料, 2021, 49(9): 234-239.
	CAO Xuejuan, SU Yue, DENG Mei. Investigation on interaction between polymer modifier and asphalt based on molecular dynamics simulation[J]. New Chemical Materials, 2021, 49(9): 234-239.
14	YANG T Y, CHEN M Z, ZHOU X X, et al. Evaluation of thermal-mechanical properties of bio-oil regenerated aged asphalt[J]. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2018, 11(11): E2224.
15	DING Gongying, YU Xin, DONG Fuqiang, et al. Using silane coupling agent coating on acidic aggregate surfaces to enhance the adhesion between asphalt and aggregate: A molecular dynamics simulation[J]. Materials, 2020, 13(23): 5580.
16	CUI Wentian, HUANG Wenke, XIAO Zhicheng, et al. The effect of moisture on the adhesion energy and nanostructure of asphalt-aggregate interface system using molecular dynamics simulation[J]. Molecules, 2020, 25(18): 4165.
17	LUO Daisong, GUO Meng, TAN Yiqiu. Molecular simulation of minerals-asphalt interfacial interaction[J]. Minerals, 2018, 8(5): 176.
18	肖亚军, 刘龙旗, 毛雪松, 等. 基于分子动力学的再生沥青自愈合能力研究[J]. 公路, 2021, 66(7): 1-6.
	XIAO Yajun, LIU Longqi, MAO Xuesong, et al. Research on self-healing capability of recycled asphalt based on molecular dynamics[J]. Highway, 2021, 66(7): 1-6.
19	XU Guangji, WANG Hao. Molecular dynamics study of oxidative aging effect on asphalt binder properties[J]. Fuel, 2017, 188: 1-10.
20	SUN Wei, WANG Hao. Self-healing of asphalt binder with cohesive failure: Insights from molecular dynamics simulation[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 262: 120538.
21	LI D D, GREENFIELD M L. Chemical compositions of improved model asphalt systems for molecular simulations[J]. Fuel, 2014, 115: 347-356.
22	ZHAO Z, WU S, ZHOU X, et al. Molecular simulations of properties changes on nano-layered double hydroxides-modified bitumen[J]. Materials Research Innovations, 2015, 19(S8): S8-556.
23	吴亦超. 基于动态剪切流变仪与分子动力学理论的多尺度沥青愈合行为研究[D]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2021.
	WU Yichao. Multi-scale asphalt healing behavior based on dynamic shear rheometer and molecular dynamics theory[D]. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology, 2021.
24	BANDURA A, KUBICKI J, SOFO J. Periodic density functional theory study of water adsorption on the α-quartz (101) surface[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2011, 115: 5756-5766.
25	Breixo GÓMEZ-MEIJIDE, AJAM Harith, Pedro LASTRA-GONZÁLEZ, et al. Effect of ageing and RAP content on the induction healing properties of asphalt mixtures[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 179: 468-476.
26	杨健, 郭乃胜, 郭晓阳, 等. 基于分子动力学的泡沫沥青-集料界面黏附性研究[J]. 材料导报, 2021, 35(S2): 138-144.
	YANG Jian, GUO Naisheng, GUO Xiaoyang, et al. Adhesion of foamed asphalt-aggregate interface based on molecular dynamics[J]. Materials Review, 2021, 35(S2): 138-144.
27	王吉, 郑传峰. 沥青混合料界面黏附黏结效应分子动力学研究[J]. 路基工程, 2021(2): 15-21.
	WANG Ji, ZHENG Chuanfeng. Study on molecular dynamics of interfacial adhesion and cohesion of asphalt mixture[J]. Subgrade Engineering, 2021(2): 15-21.
28	邱延峻, 苏婷, 郑鹏飞, 等. 基于分子模拟的沥青胶结料物理老化机理研究[J]. 建筑材料学报, 2020, 23(6): 1464-1470.
	QIU Yanjun, SU Ting, ZHENG Pengfei, et al. Physical aging mechanism of asphalt binder based on molecular simulation[J]. Journal of Building Materials, 2020, 23(6): 1464-1470.
29	单超. 基于分子模拟技术的沥青-矿料界面力学性能研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2021.
	SHAN Chao. Study on mechanical properties of asphalt-mineral interface based on molecular simulation technology[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2021.
30	汤文, 王基双, 吕悦晶. 基于分子动力学的沥青自愈合行为研究[J]. 武汉科技大学学报, 2020, 43(2): 123-127.
	TANG Wen, WANG Jishuang, Yuejing LYU. Study on self-healing behavior of asphalt binder based on molecular dynamics[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 2020, 43(2): 123-127.
31	朱建勇. 沥青胶结料自愈合行为的分子动力学模拟[J]. 建筑材料学报, 2018, 21(3): 433-439.
	ZHU Jianyong. Molecular dynamic simulation of self-healing behavior of asphalt binder[J]. Journal of Building Materials, 2018, 21(3): 433-439.
32	朱建勇, 何兆益. 抗剥落剂与沥青相容性的分子动力学研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2016, 33(1): 34-40.
	ZHU Jianyong, HE Zhaoyi. Research of compatiblity of asphalt and anti-stripping agent using molecular dynamics[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2016, 33(1): 34-40.
33	罗磊. 沥青与矿料界面相互作用的分子动力学模拟研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2021.
	LUO Lei. Molecular dynamics simulation of asphalt-aggregate interfacial interaction[D]. Xi'an: Changan University, 2021.
34	王吉. 沥青材料自愈合行为的分子动力学模拟[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2021.
	WANG Ji. Molecular dynamics simulation of self-healing behavior of asphalt materials[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2021.
35	WOOL R P, O'CONNOR K M. A theory crack healing in polymers[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1981, 52(10): 5953-5963.
36	BHASIN A, BOMMAVARAM R, GREENFIELD M L, et al. Use of molecular dynamics to investigate self-healing mechanisms in asphalt binders[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2011, 23(4): 485-492.
37	LUO L, CHU L J, FWA T. Molecular dynamics analysis of oxidative aging effects on thermodynamic and interfacial bonding properties of asphalt mixtures[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 269: 121299.
38	GONG Yan, XU Jian, YAN Erhu, et al. The self-healing performance of carbon-based nanomaterials modified asphalt binders based on molecular dynamics simulations[J]. Frontiers in Materials, 2021, 7: 599551.

项目	针入度（25℃、100g、5s）/0.1mm	延度（5cm/min、15℃）/cm	软化点/℃
70^#基质沥青	65	130	49
技术标准	60~80	>100	≥ 45

项目	针入度（25℃、100g、5s）/0.1mm	延度（5cm/min、15℃）/cm	软化点/℃
70^#基质沥青	65	130	49
技术标准	60~80	>100	≥ 45

项目	组分含量/%
项目	胶质R	沥青质A_s	芳香分A_r	饱和分S
70^#基质沥青	37.71	22.40	22.39	17.50
技术要求	31~55	>10	21~47	12~27

项目	组分含量/%
项目	胶质R	沥青质A_s	芳香分A_r	饱和分S
70^#基质沥青	37.71	22.40	22.39	17.50
技术要求	31~55	>10	21~47	12~27

组分	分子	分子名称	分子式	分子量	原子数	代码
胶质	胶质A	Pyridinonhopane	C₃₆H₅₇N	503.8	94	a
	胶质B	Quinolinohopane	C₄₀H₅₉N	553.9	100	b
	胶质C	Trimethylbenzeneoxane	C₂₉H₅₀O	414.7	80	c
	胶质D	Benzobisbenzothiophene	C₁₈H₁₀S₂	290.4	30	d
	胶质E	Thioisorenieratane	C₄₀H₆₀S	573.0	101	e
沥青质	沥青质A	Asphaltene-phenol	C₄₂H₅₄O	574.9	97	f
	沥青质B	Asphaltene-pyrrole	C₆₆H₈₁N	888.4	148	g
	沥青质C	Asphaltene-thiophene	C₅₁H₆₂S	707.1	114	h
芳香分	芳香分A	PHPN	C₃₅H₄₄	464.7	79	i
芳香分	芳香分B	DOCHN	C₃₀H₄₆	406.7	76	j
饱和分	饱和分A	Squalane	C₃₀H₆₂	422.8	92	k
饱和分	饱和分B	Hopane	C₃₅H₆₂	482.9	97	l

不同裂缝损伤和愈合温度条件下沥青自愈合行为的分子模拟

Molecular simulation of self-healing behavior of asphalt under different crack damage and healing temperature

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 14

参考文献 38

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

组分	分子	分子量	原子数	模型分子数	质量分数/%	模型原子数	模型比例/%
胶质	A	503.9	94	9	7.80	846	37.51
	B	533.9	100	9	8.54	900
	C	414.7	80	10	6.39	800
	D	290.4	30	10	4.97	300
	E	573	101	10	9.81	1010
沥青质	A	574.9	97	6	5.91	582	22.31
	B	888.4	148	6	9.13	888
	C	707.1	114	6	7.27	684
芳香分	A	464.7	79	15	11.94	1185	22.39
芳香分	B	406.7	76	15	10.45	1140	22.39
饱和分	A	422.8	92	12	8.69	1104	17.79
饱和分	B	482.9	97	11	9.10	1067	17.79
总和	—	—	—	119	100	10506	100

裂缝宽度/Å	温度/K	自由体积	原子占用体积	FFV/%
10	313	77267.19	125801.34	38.05
	323	77247.33	125769.34	38.05
	333	78227.10	125807.38	38.34
30	313	75845.83	125785.55	37.62
	323	78112.28	125814.18	38.30
	333	78929.77	125797.60	38.55
50	313	73915.30	125800.50	37.01
	323	75050.53	125767.53	37.37
	333	75810.68	125808.70	37.60
70^#（单晶胞）	—	54694.88	62944.17	46.49

[1]	杨玉地, 李文韬, 钱永康, 惠军红. 工业燃烧室天然气湍流扩散火焰长度影响因素分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 267-275.
[2]	顾永正, 张永生. HBr改性飞灰对Hg⁰的动态吸附及动力学模型[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 498-509.
[3]	崔守成, 徐洪波, 彭楠. 两种MOFs材料用于O₂/He吸附分离的模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 382-390.
[4]	廖志新, 罗涛, 王红, 孔佳骏, 申海平, 管翠诗, 王翠红, 佘玉成. 溶剂脱沥青技术应用与进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4573-4586.
[5]	张振, 李丹, 陈辰, 吴菁岚, 应汉杰, 乔浩. 吸附树脂对唾液酸的分离纯化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4153-4158.
[6]	欧阳素芳, 周道伟, 黄伟, 贾凤. 新型耐迁移橡胶防老剂的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3708-3719.
[7]	谭利鹏, 申峻, 王玉高, 刘刚, 徐青柏. 煤沥青和石油沥青共混改性的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3749-3759.
[8]	杨发容, 顾丽莉, 刘洋, 李伟雪, 蔡洁云, 王惠平. 计算机模拟辅助特丁津分子印迹聚合物的制备及应用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3157-3166.
[9]	陆诗建, 张媛媛, 吴文华, 杨菲, 刘玲, 康国俊, 李清方, 陈宏福, 王宁, 王风, 张娟娟. 百万吨级CO₂捕集项目亚硝胺污染物扩散健康风险评估[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3209-3216.
[10]	李瑞东, 黄辉, 同国虎, 王跃社. 原油精馏塔中铵盐吸湿特性及其腐蚀行为[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2809-2818.
[11]	徐贤, 崔楼伟, 刘杰, 施俊合, 朱永红, 刘姣姣, 刘涛, 郑化安, 李冬. 原料组成对半焦中间相结构发展的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2343-2352.
[12]	卢兴福, 戴波, 杨世亮. 转鼓内圆柱形颗粒混合的超二次曲面离散单元法模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2252-2261.
[13]	蔡江涛, 候刘华, 兰雨金, 张晨陈, 刘国阳, 朱由余, 张建兰, 赵世永, 张亚婷. 沥青基多孔炭材料的制备及在超级电容器中的应用进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1895-1906.
[14]	赵毅, 杨臻, 王佳, 李静雯, 郑煜. 沥青胶结料自愈合行为分子动力学模拟研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 803-813.
[15]	李晶晶, 赵曜, 徐沣驰, 李康建. 不同径流冲刷作用下多孔炉渣沥青混合料重金属的浸出特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(10): 5520-5530.

沥青种类	CED/J·cm^-3	SP/(J·cm^-3)^1/2
70^#基质沥青	254	15.9
参考值	234~529	13.3~22.5^[33-34]

沥青种类	CED/J·cm^-3	SP/(J·cm^-3)^1/2
70^#基质沥青	254	15.9
参考值	234~529	13.3~22.5^[33-34]