关于天然气管网安全掺氢比10%的商榷

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-1438

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

大力发展氢能是实现“碳达峰、碳中和”目标的重要途径之一。将氢气掺入现有天然气管网利于实现氢能经济高效、大规模输送与应用。安全掺氢比是掺氢天然气管输系统有待解决的关键问题之一。有观点提出当掺氢天然气中的掺氢比在10%以下时，可无需加以验证地直接通过天然气管网输送。本文提出从目前来看，该观点不成立。文章从管网系统掺氢适应性、示范项目掺氢比探讨和标准规范3个方面阐述了个中缘由。文中指出，掺氢天然气管输技术正处于起步阶段，其安全保障还面临诸多挑战，任何结论都需要经过反复论证和验证，以稳步推动氢能产业发展。

关键词: 氢能, 掺氢天然气, 氢安全, 管道输送, 掺氢比

Abstract:

Vigorously developing hydrogen energy is an important way to achieve the goal of "carbon peak and carbon neutrality". Mixing hydrogen gas into existing natural gas grids is conducive to the economical, efficient and large-scale transportation and application of hydrogen energy. Appropriate hydrogen mixing ratio is one of the key problems to be solved in hydrogen-mixed natural gas pipeline system. It is said that when the ratio of hydrogen mixing into natural gas is below 10%, it can be transported directly through the natural gas grids without verification. However, this view is untenable at present. The reasons were expounded in this paper from three aspects: adaptability of pipe network system to hydrogen mixing, discussion on hydrogen mixing ratio of demonstration project, and standard specification. Pipeline transportation technology of hydrogen-mixed natural gas was in its initial stage and its safety guarantee still faced many challenges. Any conclusion needed to be demonstrated and verified repeatedly in order to steadily promote the development of hydrogen energy.

Key words: hydrogen energy, hydrogen-mixed natural gas, hydrogen safety, pipeline transportation, hydrogen mixing ratio

中图分类号:

TE832

陈伟锋, 尚娟, 邢百汇, 魏皓天, 顾超华, 花争立. 关于天然气管网安全掺氢比10%的商榷[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(3): 1487-1493.

CHEN Weifeng, SHANG Juan, XING Baihui, WEI Haotian, GU Chaohua, HUA Zhengli. Discussion on 10% as a safe ratio of hydrogen mixing into natural gas grids[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(3): 1487-1493.

图/表 4

图1 X80管线钢在模拟掺氢天然气环境中的疲劳裂纹扩展速率曲线[3]

图2 20#钢在真实掺氢天然气环境中力学性能原位测试结果

图3 现有不同设备可适应的掺氢比例上限[20]

图4 部分国家和地区对天然气中掺氢比例上限的要求[20, 30]

参考文献 38

1	梁云凤. 氢能经济是实现碳中和的重要路径[N]. 中国能源报, 2021-04-26(4).
	LIANG Yunfeng. Hydrogen economy is an important way to achieve carbon neutrality[N]. China Energy News, 2021-04-26(4).
2	郑津洋, 胡军, 韩武林, 等. 中国氢能承压设备风险分析和对策的几点思考[J]. 压力容器, 2020, 37(6): 39-47.
	ZHENG Jinyang, HU Jun, HAN Wulin, et al. Risk analysis and some countermeasures of pressure equipment for hydrogen energy in China[J]. Pressure Vessel Technology, 2020, 37(6): 39-47.
3	蒙波. 含氢天然气高压输送管道材料性能劣化及失效后果研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2016.
	MENG Bo. Investigation on material property degradation and failure consequence of the high-pressure natural gas/hydrogen blends pipeline[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2016.
4	李敬法, 苏越, 张衡, 等. 掺氢天然气管道输送研究进展[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(4): 137-152.
	LI Jingfa, SU Yue, ZHANG Heng, et al. Research progresses on pipeline transportation of hydrogen-blended natural gas[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(4): 137-152.
5	付国强. 初探煤制天然气中氢气对X80管线钢力学性能的影响[J]. 科学时代, 2015(9): 83.
	FU Guoqiang. The effect of hydrogen in coal to natural gas on mechanical properties of X80 pipeline steel was studied[J]. Scientific Age, 2015(9): 83.
6	NGUYEN T T, PARK J, KIM W S, et al. Effect of low partial hydrogen in a mixture with methane on the mechanical properties of X70 pipeline steel[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(3): 2368-2381.
7	NGUYEN T T, PARK J S, NAHM S H, et al. Evaluation of hydrogen related degradation of API X42 pipeline under hydrogen/natural gas mixture conditions using small punch test[J]. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2021, 113: 102961.
8	HOLBROOK J, COLLINGS E, CIALONE H, et al. Hydrogen degradation of pipeline steels: final report[R]. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), 1986.
9	李正峰. 渗氢介质及其对钢质天然气管道的内腐蚀机理[J]. 煤气与热力, 2020, 40(2): 32-34, 43.
	LI Zhengfeng. Hydrogen permeating media and its internal corrosion mechanism to steel natural gas pipeline[J]. Gas & Heat, 2020, 40(2): 32-34, 43.
10	SHANG Juan, CHEN Weifeng, ZHENG Jinyang, et al. Enhanced hydrogen embrittlement of low-carbon steel to natural gas/hydrogen mixtures[J]. Scripta Materialia, 2020, 189: 67-71.
11	SHANG J, WANG J Z, CHEN W F, et al. Different effects of pure hydrogen vs. hydrogen/natural gas mixture on fracture toughness degradation of two carbon steels[J]. Materials Letters, 2021, 296: 129924.
12	HOLBROOK J H, CIALONE H J, MAYFIELD M E, et al. Effect of hydrogen on low-cycle-fatigue life and subcritical crack growth in pipeline steels[R]. US Government Report, 1982.
13	NELSON H G. Hydrogen-induced slow crack growth of a plain carbon pipeline steel under conditions of cyclic loading[J]. Industrial Management ＆ Data Systems, 1976, 107(7): 925-935.
14	HAESELDONCKX D, D’HAESELEER W. The use of the natural-gas pipeline infrastructure for hydrogen transport in a changing market structure[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(10/11): 1381-1386.
15	Dongsu BAE, SUNG C E, BANG H J, et al. Effect of highly pressurized hydrogen gas charging on the hydrogen embrittlement of API X70 steel[J]. Metals and Materials International, 2014, 20(4): 653-658.
16	ENERGY SIEMENS. Hydrogen infrastructure-The pillar of energy transition: the practical conversion of long-distance gas networks to hydrogen operation[EB/OL]. .
17	ENERGY SIEMENS. Reusing gas infrastructure for hydrogen transportation: material testing[EB/OL]. .
18	黄明, 吴勇, 文习之, 等. 利用天然气管道掺混输送氢气的可行性分析[J]. 煤气与热力, 2013, 33(4): 39-42.
	HUANG Ming, WU Yong, WEN Xizhi, et al. Feasibility analysis of hydrogen transport in natural gas pipeline[J]. Gas & Heat, 2013, 33(4): 39-42.
19	周杨飞, 肖超波. 在役天然气管道的可靠性分析[J]. 管道技术与设备, 2012(3): 4-6.
	ZHOU Yangfei, XIAO Chaobo. Research on the reliability analysis of in-service NG[ 18piping] [J]. Pipeline Technique and Equipment, 2012(3): 4-6.
20	IEA. The future of hydrogen seizing today’s opportunities[EB/OL]. .
21	GUANDALINI G, COLBERTALDO P, CAMPANARI S. Dynamic modeling of natural gas quality within transport pipelines in presence of hydrogen injections[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 185: 1712-1723．
22	JACEK Jaworski, ADRIAN Dudek. Study of the effects of changes in gas composition as well as ambient and gas temperature on errors of indications of thermal gas meters[J]. Energies, 2020, 13(20): 5428.
23	Europe Hydrogen. Hydrogen act-towards the creation of the european hydrogen economy[R]. 2021.
24	Union European. Using the existing natural gas system for hydrogen[R]. 2009.
25	NEDERLANDSE Gasunie N V. A step towards the hydrogen economy by using the existing natural gas grid (the NATURALHY-project)[EB/OL]. .
26	FLORISSON O, NEDERLANDSE Gasunie N V. The value of the existing natural gas system for hydrogen, the sustainable future energy carrier (progress obtained in the naturalhy-project)[EB/OL]. .
27	KIPPERS M J, DEELAAT J C, HERMKENS R J, et al. International gas research conference proceedings[C]//North Miami Beach: Curran Associates, Inc., 2011.
28	ISAAC T. HyDeploy: the UK’s first hydrogen blending deployment project[J]. Clean Energy, 2019, 3(2): 114-125.
29	International Energy Agency. World energy outlook 2019[R]. 2019.
30	Gas SoCal. Hydrogen: market fundamentals, trends and opportunities[R]. California Hydrogen Business Council, 2018.
31	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 煤制合成天然气: [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
	General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Coal-based synthetic natural gas: [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2017.
32	国家市场监督管理总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 进入天然气长输管道的气体质量要求: [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2019.
	Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Quality requirements for gases entering long-distance transportation gas pipeline: [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2019.
33	刘艳娜. 焦炉煤气中氢气和甲烷的吸附分离[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2010.
	LIU Yanna. Adsorption separation of hydrogen and methane from coke oven gas[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2010.
34	The American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Hydrogen Piping and Pipelines: [S].New York: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2019.
35	Association of International Harmonizaton Council. Hydrogen Pipeline System: C Reaffirmed 2013)[S].New York: Compressed Gas Association, 2005.
36	The German Association for Gas and Water Supply. Usage of gases from renewable sources in the public gas supply: DVGW G 262—2010 [S].
37	Regulation No. 110 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE)[EB/OL]. .
38	The German Institute for Standardisation. Automotive fuels-Compressed natural gas-Requirements and test methods: [S]. Berlin：Beuth Verlag GmbH, 2008.

[1]	孙旭东, 赵玉莹, 李诗睿, 王琦, 李晓健, 张博. 我国地方性氢能发展政策的文本量化分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3478-3488.
[2]	张巍, 王锐, 缪平, 田戈. 全球可再生能源电转甲烷的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1257-1269.
[3]	孙晖, 孟祥海, 魏景海, 周红军, 徐春明. 绿电制氢生产氨的新场景与实践[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 1098-1102.
[4]	王红霞, 徐婉怡, 张早校. 可再生电力电解制绿色氢能的发展现状与建议[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(S1): 118-131.
[5]	周红军, 周颖, 徐春明. 中国碳中和目标下CO₂转化的思考与实践[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(6): 3381-3385.
[6]	周红军, 周颖, 徐春明. 中国碳达峰碳中和目标下炼化一体化新路径与实践[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(4): 2226-2230.
[7]	王集杰, 韩哲, 陈思宇, 汤驰洲, 沙峰, 唐珊, 姚婷婷, 李灿. 太阳燃料甲醇合成[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(3): 1309-1317.
[8]	李昊阳, 张炜, 李小森, 徐纯刚. 水合物储氢的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(12): 6285-6294.
[9]	施文博, 蔡淳名, 李德威, 小野圭, 张剑波. ISO/IEC、美日中氢能技术标准化体系比较与建议[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(12): 6275-6284.
[10]	张振扬, 妙丛, 王峰, 兰玉岐, 安刚, 杨申音. 规模化氢液化装置现状及未来技术路线分析[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(12): 6261-6274.
[11]	岳国君, 林海龙, 彭元亭, 闵剑, 王梦, 熊强. 以生物质为原料的未来绿色氢能[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(8): 4678-4684.
[12]	高佳佳, 米媛媛, 周洋, 周红军, 徐泉. 新型储氢材料研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(6): 2962-2971.
[13]	郭博文, 罗聃, 周红军. 可再生能源电解制氢技术及催化剂的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(6): 2933-2951.
[14]	赵永志, 蒙波, 陈霖新, 王赓, 郑津洋, 顾超华, 张鑫, 张俊峰. 氢能源的利用现状分析[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(09): 3248-3255.
[15]	寇小文, 顾雄毅, 李平. 氢能载体十氢萘制氢表观动力学[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(09): 3279-3285.