不同气候条件下相变屋顶传热性能数值分析

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-0275

化工进展 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 104-112.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-0275

不同气候条件下相变屋顶传热性能数值分析

倪金鹏¹(), 罗祝清¹, 屈治国², 徐洪涛¹()

^1.上海理工大学能源与动力工程学院，上海 200093
^2.西安交通大学热流科学与工程教育部重点实验室，陕西西安 710049

收稿日期:2021-02-05 修回日期:2021-04-08 出版日期:2022-01-05 发布日期:2022-01-24
通讯作者: 徐洪涛
作者简介:倪金鹏（1996—），男，硕士研究生，研究方向为工程热物理。E-mail：1014078114@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2018YFF0216000);上海市国际科技合作基金(18160743600);上海市自然科学基金(20ZR1438700)

Numerical analysis on heat transfer performance of phase change roofs under different climates

NI Jinpeng¹(), LUO Zhuqing¹, QU Zhiguo², XU Hongtao¹()

^1.School of Energy and Power Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
^2.MOE Key Laboratory of Thermo-Fluid Science and Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, Shaanxi, China

Received:2021-02-05 Revised:2021-04-08 Online:2022-01-05 Published:2022-01-24
Contact: XU Hongtao

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

相变墙体可以有效降低建筑能耗并提高热舒适性。相变屋顶多孔砖内部填充相变温度为25~33℃的石蜡，引入考虑辐射与空气温度的等效温度，本文利用高性能计算显卡（GPU）加速基于焓法的多松弛时间格子玻尔兹曼算法（MRT-LBM），分析了2020年8月典型天气下中国7个城市应用不同相变温度的石蜡对屋顶热响应特性的影响。采用相变温度为27℃的石蜡进行研究，结果表明，上海地区相变屋顶中的石蜡没有发生相变，空调运行期间由屋顶进入室内单位面积的热量高达324.3kJ/m²；成都地区相变屋顶中的石蜡液化率变化最大为30%，内表面温度在25.6~27.3℃波动，温差仅为1.7℃，由屋顶进入室内单位面积的热量仅为50.9kJ/m²；武汉和北京地区的液相率变化很接近，其相变时间达到全天的50%，对应的由屋顶进入室内单位面积的热量为上海地区的0.37倍；昆明与哈尔滨地区屋顶内表面温度波动分别达到4.5℃与4.4℃，但对应的温度均在28℃以内；广州地区相变屋顶中的石蜡几乎没有发生相变，室内温度波动幅度为成都的2.6倍。北京、成都、武汉和昆明地区适合采用相变温度为27℃的石蜡，而广州、上海和哈尔滨地区适合采用相变温度为29℃、31℃和25℃的石蜡。本文工作可为相变建筑优化设计提供参考。

关键词: 相变材料, 格子-玻尔兹曼方法, 瞬态响应, 传热, 数值模拟

Abstract:

Walls filled with phase change materials (PCM) can effectively reduce building energy consumption and improve thermal comfort. The porous brick roof was filled with paraffin with a phase transition temperature of 25—33℃. The equivalent temperature considering radiation and air temperature was introduced. The GPU accelerated multi-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann method (MRT-LBM) based on enthalpy method was used to analyze the effects of paraffin wax with different phase change temperatures on the thermal response characteristics of roofs in seven cities of China in August 2020. The results of paraffin with phase change temperature of 27℃ were shown that phase change of paraffin did not occur in the building roof of Shanghai, and the entering heat flux was as high as 324.3kJ/m². The liquefaction rate of paraffin in the phase change roof of Chengdu area changed by 30%. The internal surface temperature fluctuates between 25.6℃ and 27.3℃, and the temperature difference was only 1.7℃. The entering heat flux was only 50.9kJ/m². The results indicated that the change of liquid phase rate in Wuhan and Beijing was very close, the phase transition time was 50% of the whole day and the corresponding heat flux entering the room was 0.37 times of that in Shanghai. The temperature fluctuation of the inner surface of the roof wall in Kunming and Harbin reached 4.5℃ and 4.4℃, respectively, but the corresponding temperature was 28℃. The indoor temperature fluctuation of Guangzhou was 2.6 times of that in Chengdu. Beijing, Chengdu, Wuhan and Kunming were suitable for paraffin with phase transition temperature of 27℃, while Guangzhou, Shanghai and Harbin were suitable for paraffin with phase transition temperature of 29℃, 31℃ and 25℃, respectively. This work can provide the guide for the optimization design of phase change building.

Key words: phase change materials, Lattice-Boltzmann method, transient response, heat transfer, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TU111.4

倪金鹏, 罗祝清, 屈治国, 徐洪涛. 不同气候条件下相变屋顶传热性能数值分析[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(1): 104-112.

NI Jinpeng, LUO Zhuqing, QU Zhiguo, XU Hongtao. Numerical analysis on heat transfer performance of phase change roofs under different climates[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(1): 104-112.

图/表 1

参考文献 23

1	石永桂. 超低/近零能耗建筑发展综述[J]. 北方建筑, 2019, 4(2): 50-53.
	SHI Yonggui. Overview of the development of ultra-low/near-zero energy buildings[J]. Northern Architecture, 2019, 4(2): 50-53.
2	魏楚, 沈子玥. 基于城乡视角的居民能源消费影响因素研究[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2019(12): 4-16.
	WEI Chu, SHEN Ziyue. Determinants of residential energy consumption: a urban-rural comparison[J]. Economic Theory and Business Management, 2019(12): 4-16.
3	清华大学建筑节能研究中心. 中国建筑节能年度发展研究报告农村住宅专题2020版[M]. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社, 2020: 115.
	THUBERC. 2020 Annual report on China building energy efficiency[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2020: 115.
4	KIM Taeyeon, Sangmin AHN, LEIGH Seug Bok. Energy consumption analysis of a residential building with phase change materials under various cooling and heating conditions[J]. Indoor and Built Environment, 2014, 23(5): 730-741.
5	杨柳, 乔宇豪, 刘衍, 等. 建筑相变蓄热及夜间通风技术研究进展[J]. 科学通报, 2018, 63(7): 629-640.
	YANG Liu, QIAO Yuhao, LIU Yan, et al. Review of phase change heat storage and night ventilation technology of buildings[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2018, 63(7): 629-640.
6	王柏超, 李栋, 陈宏坤, 等. 相变储能技术调控温室热环境研究进展[J]. 建筑热能通风空调, 2020, 39(12): 49-53.
	WANG Baichao, LI Dong, CHEN Hongkun, et al. Research progress on phase change energy storage technology regulating greenhouse thermal environment[J]. Building Energy & Environment, 2020, 39(12): 49-53.
7	JIN X, SHI D J, MEDINA M A, et al. Optimal location of PCM layer in building walls under Nanjing (China) weather conditions[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2017, 129(3): 1767-1778.
8	LIU J, LIU Y, YANG L, et al. Climatic and seasonal suitability of phase change materials coupled with night ventilation for office buildings in Western China[J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 147: 356-373.
9	李兴会, 陈敏智, 周晓燕. 复合定形相变材料的封装及应用研究新进展[J]. 工程科学学报, 2020, 42(11): 1422-1432.
	LI Xinghui, CHEN Minzhi, ZHOU Xiaoyan. Research progress in encapsulation and application of shape-stabilized composite phase-change materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2020, 42(11): 1422-1432.
10	GUARINO F, ATHIENITIS A, CELLURA M, et al. PCM thermal storage design in buildings: experimental studies and applications to solaria in cold climates[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 185: 95-106.
11	SOLGI E, HAMEDANI Z, FERNANDO R, et al. A parametric study of phase change material behaviour when used with night ventilation in different climatic zones[J]. Building and Environment, 2019, 147: 327-336.
12	YU J H, YANG Q C, YE H, et al. Thermal performance evaluation and optimal design of building roof with outer-layer shape-stabilized PCM[J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 145: 2538-2549.
13	ZWANZIG S D, LIAN Y S, BREHOB E G. Numerical simulation of phase change material composite wallboard in a multi-layered building envelope[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2013, 69: 27-40.
14	ALAM M, JAMIL H, SANJAYAN J, et al. Energy saving potential of phase change materials in major Australian cities[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2014, 78: 192-201.
15	SO R M C, LEUNG R C K, KAM E W S, et al. Progress in the development of a new lattice Boltzmann method[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2019, 190: 440-469.
16	REN Q L, CHAN C L. GPU accelerated numerical study of PCM melting process in an enclosure with internal fins using lattice Boltzmann method[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016, 100: 522-535.
17	KANT K, SHUKLA A, SHARMA A. Heat transfer studies of building brick containing phase change materials[J]. Solar Energy, 2017, 155: 1233-1242.
18	China Weather Network[DB/OL]. [2020-09-02]. .
19	HICHEM N, NOUREDDINE S, NADIA S, et al. Experimental and numerical study of a usual brick filled with PCM to improve the thermal inertia of buildings[J]. Energy Procedia, 2013, 36: 766-775.
20	SUZUKI K, KAWASAKI T, FURUMACHI N, et al. A thermal immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method for moving-boundary flows with Dirichlet and Neumann conditions[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 121: 1099-1117.
21	IMANUVILOV O Y, UHLMANN G, YAMAMOTO M. The Neumann-to-Dirichlet map in two dimensions[J]. Advances in Mathematics, 2015, 281: 578-593.
22	BALLIM Y. A numerical model and associated calorimeter for predicting temperature profiles in mass concrete[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2004, 26 (6): 695-703.
23	LUO Z Q, XU H T, LOU Q, et al. GPU-accelerated lattice Boltzmann simulation of heat transfer characteristics of porous brick roof filled with phase change materials[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 119: 104911.

[1]	肖辉, 张显均, 兰治科, 王苏豪, 王盛. 液态金属绕流管束流动传热进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 10-20.
[2]	王太, 苏硕, 李晟瑞, 马小龙, 刘春涛. 交流电场中贴壁气泡的动力学行为[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 133-141.
[3]	赵晨, 苗天泽, 张朝阳, 洪芳军, 汪大海. 负压状态窄缝通道乙二醇水溶液传热特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 148-157.
[4]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[5]	郭强, 赵文凯, 肖永厚. 增强流体扰动强化变压吸附甲硫醚/氮气分离的数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 64-72.
[6]	邵博识, 谭宏博. 锯齿波纹板对挥发性有机物低温脱除过程强化模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 84-93.
[7]	陈林, 徐培渊, 张晓慧, 陈杰, 徐振军, 陈嘉祥, 密晓光, 冯永昌, 梅德清. 液化天然气绕管式换热器壳侧混合工质流动及传热特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4496-4503.
[8]	刘炫麟, 王驿凯, 戴苏洲, 殷勇高. 热泵中氨基甲酸铵分解反应特性及反应器结构优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4522-4530.
[9]	赵曦, 马浩然, 李平, 黄爱玲. 错位碰撞型微混合器混合性能的模拟分析与优化设计[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4559-4572.
[10]	时雨, 赵运超, 樊智轩, 蒋达华. 夏热冬冷地区相变屋面最佳相变温度的实验研究[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4828-4836.
[11]	卜治丞, 焦波, 林海花, 孙洪源. 脉动热管计算流体力学模型与研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4167-4181.
[12]	汪健生, 张辉鹏, 刘雪玲, 傅煜郭, 朱剑啸. 多孔介质结构对储层内流动和换热特性的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4212-4220.
[13]	王云刚, 焦健, 邓世丰, 赵钦新, 邵怀爽. 冷凝换热与协同脱硫性能实验分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4230-4237.
[14]	叶振东, 刘涵, 吕静, 张亚宁, 刘洪芝. 基于钙镁二元盐的热化学储能反应器的性能优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4307-4314.
[15]	汤磊, 曾德森, 凌子夜, 张正国, 方晓明. 相变蓄冷材料及系统应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4322-4339.

不同气候条件下相变屋顶传热性能数值分析

Numerical analysis on heat transfer performance of phase change roofs under different climates

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 1

参考文献 23

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价