CO2醇胺富液低能耗再生研究进展

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-1841

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

醇胺法吸收CO₂具有效率高、易改造等优点，但较高的再生能耗严重阻碍了其实际应用。本文在介绍醇胺吸收机理和各种醇胺的解吸特性的基础上，分析了采用非水溶剂、固体酸催化剂和纳米颗粒等方法来降低醇胺富液热解吸能耗，以及采用钙基化合物对富液进行化学解吸的原理及可行性。分析表明：再生热负荷与吸收产物密切相关，选择适合的醇胺吸收剂可降低再生反应自由能；非水溶剂在降低显热和汽化热方面效果显著，利用乙醇吸收产物稳定性低的特性，能在降低显热和汽化热的同时降低解吸热；优化固体酸催化剂的中孔比表面积和B酸酸位点或制备新型双功能催化剂能缩短加热时间和降低温度；纳米颗粒通过提高溶液传热传质效率减小再生热负荷，但对醇胺传质传热效果还需进一步研究；采用氯化钙和氢氧化钙等钙基化合物解吸富液成本低、效果好，通过改善粉煤灰等含钙工业废料的均质性和有效成分占比，化学解吸成本有望进一步降低，具有广阔的应用前景。

关键词: 二氧化碳, 解吸, 醇胺, 低能耗, 再生

Abstract:

Alkanolamine-based chemical absorption is efficient and convenient for CO₂ capture. However, the practical application of this technology is limited by high energy requirement of regeneration. Two methods of regeneration were presented based on the reaction mechanisms and characteristics, namely thermal regeneration with non-aqueous solutions, solid acid catalysts and nanoparticles, and chemical regeneration with calcium ions. The analyses showed that different kinds of amine would give different products which were related to the free energy for regeneration. Therefore, it is a necessary to choose suitable amine or amine mixtures. Ethanol, a common nonaqueous solvent, is able to reduce the demand of heat of desorption through decreasing the sensible heat and heat of vaporization. Besides, the reaction time and temperature could be reduced by optimizing the Br?nsted acid sites and mesoporous surface area of solid acid catalysts. Furthermore, the use of nanoparticles is able to enhance heat and mass transfer of solutions, resulting in heat duty reductions during regeneration. But further research is needed to confirm the reinforcing effects for amine solutions. Chemical regeneration with calcium ions was found to reduce the cost of regeneration largely and showed promising potential in industrial application. Moreover, further decrease in the cost could be achieved by improving the homogeneity of fly ash.

Key words: carbon dioxide, desorption, alkanolamines, low energy consumption, regeneration

中图分类号:

X511

张卫风, 许元龙, 王秋华. CO₂醇胺富液低能耗再生研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(8): 4497-4507.

ZHANG Weifeng, XU Yuanlong, WANG Qiuhua. Progress of research on regeneration of rich alkanolamine solution with low energy consumption[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(8): 4497-4507.

图/表 2

参考文献 75

1	LYU D, CHEN J Y, YANG K X, et al. Ultrahigh CO₂/CH₄ and CO₂/N₂ adsorption selectivities on a cost-effectively L-aspartic acid based metal-organic framework[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 375: 122074.
2	SERRA-CRESPO P, BERGER R, YANG W P, et al. Separation of CO₂/CH₄ mixtures over NH₂-MIL-53—An experimental and modelling study[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2015, 124: 96-108.
3	HU Z G, NALAPARAJU A, PENG Y W, et al. Modulated hydrothermal synthesis of UiO-66(Hf)-type metal-organic frameworks for optimal carbon dioxide separation[J]. Inorganic Chemistry, 2016, 55(3): 1134-1141.
4	SONG C F, LI R, FAN Z C, et al. CO₂/N₂ separation performance of Pebax/MIL-101 and Pebax /NH₂-MIL-101 mixed matrix membranes and intensification via sub-ambient operation[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 238: 116500.
5	张卫风, 马伟春, 邱雪霏. 醇胺吸收液的浸润性对膜吸收法脱除CO₂性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(12): 4686-4691.
	ZHANG Weifeng, MA Weichun, QIU Xuefei. Effect of infiltration of organic amine absorbents on CO₂ removal performance with membrane gas absorption method[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(12): 4686-4691.
6	张卫风, 李娟, 王秋华, 等. 燃煤烟气中CO₂膜吸收分离技术的膜浸润特性述评[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(8): 3866-3873.
	ZHANG Weifeng, LI Juan, WANG Qiuhua, et al. Review on membrane wettability of membrane CO₂ absorption method from coal-fired flue gas[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(8): 3866-3873.
7	SHI H C, FU J X, WU Q M, et al. Studies of the coordination effect of DEA-MEA blended amines (within 1+4 to 2+3M) under heterogeneous catalysis by means of absorption and desorption parameters[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 236: 116179.
8	AFKHAMIPOUR M, MOFARAHI M, REZAEI A, et al. Experimental and theoretical investigation of equilibrium absorption performance of CO₂ using a mixed 1-dimethylamino-2-propanol (1DMA2P) and monoethanolamine (MEA) solution[J]. Fuel, 2019, 256: 115877.
9	NAKHJIRI A T, HEYDARINASAB A, BAKHTIARI O, et al. The effect of membrane pores wettability on CO₂ removal from CO₂/CH₄ gaseous mixture using NaOH, MEA and TEA liquid absorbents in hollow fiber membrane contactor[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2018, 26(9): 1845-1861.
10	林海周, 裴爱国, 方梦祥. 燃煤电厂烟气二氧化碳胺法捕集工艺改进研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(12): 4874-4886.
	LIN Haizhou, PEI Aiguo, FANG Mengxiang. Progress of research on process modifications for amine solvent-based post combustion CO₂ capture from coal-fired power plant[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(12): 4874-4886.
11	MANZOLINI G, SANCHEZ FERNANDEZ E, REZVANI S, et al. Economic assessment of novel amine based CO₂ capture technologies integrated in power plants based on European Benchmarking Task Force methodology[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 138: 546-558.
12	LITTEL R J, VERSTEEG G F, SWAAIJ W P M VAN. Kinetics of CO₂ with primary and secondary amines in aqueous solutions—I. Zwitterion deprotonation kinetics for DEA and DIPA in aqueous blends of alkanolamines[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1992, 47(8): 2027-2035.
13	VAIDYA P D, KENIG E Y. CO₂-alkanolamine reaction kinetics: a review of recent studies[J]. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2007, 30(11): 1467-1474.
14	XIAO M, LIU H L, GAO H X, et al. CO₂ absorption with aqueous tertiary amine solutions: equilibrium solubility and thermodynamic modeling[J]. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 2018, 122: 170-182.
15	SINGTO S, SUPAP T, IDEM R, et al. Synthesis of new amines for enhanced carbon dioxide (CO₂) capture performance: the effect of chemical structure on equilibrium solubility, cyclic capacity, kinetics of absorption and regeneration, and heats of absorption and regeneration[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2016, 167: 97-107.
16	KANG M K, JEON S B, CHO J H, et al. Characterization and comparison of the CO₂ absorption performance into aqueous, quasi-aqueous and non-aqueous MEA solutions[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2017, 63: 281-288.
17	GUO H, LI C X, SHI X Q, et al. Nonaqueous amine-based absorbents for energy efficient CO₂ capture[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 239: 725-734.
18	KANG S J, SHEN X Z, YANG W Z. Investigation of CO₂ desorption kinetics in MDEA and MDEA+DEA rich amine solutions with thermo-gravimetric analysis method[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, 95: 102947.
19	DE ÁVILA S G, LOGLI M A, MATOS J R. Kinetic study of the thermal decomposition of monoethanolamine (MEA), diethanolamine (DEA), triethanolamine (TEA) and methyldiethanolamine (MDEA)[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 42: 666-671.
20	WAI S K, NWAOHA C, SAIWAN C, et al. Absorption heat, solubility, absorption and desorption rates, cyclic capacity, heat duty, and absorption kinetic modeling of AMP-DETA blend for post-combustion CO₂ capture[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2018, 194: 89-95.
21	LIU B, LUO X, GAO H X, et al. Reaction kinetics of the absorption of carbon dioxide (CO₂) in aqueous solutions of sterically hindered secondary alkanolamines using the stopped-flow technique[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2017, 170: 16-25.
22	MURAI S, KATO Y, MAEZAWA Y, et al. Novel hindered amine absorbent for CO₂ capture[J]. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 417-422.
23	NARKU-TETTEH J, MUCHAN P L, SAIWAN C, et al. Effect of side chain structure and number of hydroxyl groups of primary, secondary and tertiary amines on their post-combustion CO₂ capture performance[J]. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114: 1811-1827.
24	DERKS P W J, KLEINGELD T, AKEN C VAN, et al. Kinetics of absorption of carbon dioxide in aqueous piperazine solutions[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2006, 61(20): 6837-6854.
25	KHAN A A, HALDER G, SAHA A K. Experimental investigation on efficient carbon dioxide capture using piperazine (PZ) activated aqueous methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) solution in a packed column[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2017, 64: 163-173.
26	MUCHAN P L, NARKU-TETTEH J, SAIWAN C, et al. Effect of number of amine groups in aqueous polyamine solution on carbon dioxide (CO₂) capture activities[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2017, 184: 128-134.
27	SHARIF M, ZHANG T T, WU X M, et al. Evaluation of CO₂ absorption performance by molecular dynamic simulation for mixed secondary and tertiary amines[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, 97: 103059.
28	XU G W, ZHANG C F, QIN S J, et al. Kinetics study on absorption of carbon dioxide into solutions of activated methyldiethanolamine[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1992, 31(3): 921-927.
29	ZHANG X, ZHANG C F, QIN S J, et al. A kinetics study on the absorption of carbon dioxide into a mixed aqueous solution of methyldiethanolamine and piperazine[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2001, 40(17): 3785-3791.
30	ZHANG T T, YU Y S, ZHANG Z X. An interactive chemical enhancement of CO₂ capture in the MEA/PZ/AMP/DEA binary solutions[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 74: 119-129.
31	SHI H C, NAAMI A, IDEM R, et al. Catalytic and non catalytic solvent regeneration during absorption-based CO₂ capture with single and blended reactive amine solvents[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2014, 26: 39-50.
32	SHI H C, IDEM R, NAAMI A, et al. Catalytic solvent regeneration using hot water during amine based CO₂ capture process[J]. Energy Procedia, 2014, 63: 266-272.
33	NAKAI H, NISHIMURA Y, KAIHO T, et al. Contrasting mechanisms for CO₂ absorption and regeneration processes in aqueous amine solutions: insights from density-functional tight-binding molecular dynamics simulations[J]. Chemical Physics Letters, 2016, 647: 127-131.
34	SALEH BAIRQ Z ALI, GAO H X, HUANG Y F, et al. Enhancing CO₂ desorption performance in rich MEA solution by addition of SO₄^2-/ZrO₂/SiO₂ bifunctional catalyst[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 252: 113440.
35	NWAOHA C, IDEM R, SUPAP T, et al. Heat duty, heat of absorption, sensible heat and heat of vaporization of 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP), piperazine (PZ) and monoethanolamine (MEA) tri-solvent blend for carbon dioxide (CO₂) capture[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2017, 170: 26-35.
36	ROCHELLE G T. Amine scrubbing for CO₂ capture[J]. Science, 2009, 325(5948): 1652-1654.
37	YUAN Y, ROCHELLE G T. CO₂ absorption rate and capacity of semi-aqueous piperazine for CO₂ capture[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2019, 85: 182-186.
38	BOUGIE F, POKRAS D, FAN X F. Novel non-aqueous MEA solutions for CO₂ capture[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2019, 86: 34-42.
39	WANDERLEY R R, PINTO D D D, KNUUTILA H K. Investigating opportunities for water-lean solvents in CO₂ capture: VLE and heat of absorption in water-lean solvents containing MEA[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 231: 115883.
40	BARZAGLI F, MANI F, PERUZZINI M. Efficient CO₂ absorption and low temperature desorption with non-aqueous solvents based on 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP)[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 16: 217-223.
41	CHEN S M, CHEN S Y, ZHANG Y C, et al. Species distribution of CO₂ absorption/desorption in aqueous and non-aqueous N-ethylmonoethanolamine solutions[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2016, 47: 151-158.
42	LIU F, JING G H, ZHOU X B, et al. Performance and mechanisms of triethylene tetramine (TETA) and 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) in aqueous and nonaqueous solutions for CO₂ capture[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2018, 6(1): 1352-1361.
43	LAI Q H, KONG L L, GONG W B, et al. Low-energy-consumption and environmentally friendly CO₂ capture via blending alcohols into amine solution[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 254: 113696.
44	AKACHUKU A, OSEI P A, DECARDI-NELSON B, et al. Experimental and kinetic study of the catalytic desorption of CO₂ from CO₂-loaded monoethanolamine (MEA) and blended monoethanolamine- methyl-diethanolamine (MEA-MDEA) solutions[J]. Energy, 2019, 179: 475-489.
45	BHATTI U H, SHAH A K, HUSSAIN A, et al. Catalytic activity of facilely synthesized mesoporous HZSM-5 catalysts for optimizing the CO₂ desorption rate from CO₂-rich amine solutions[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 389: 123439.
46	ZHANG X W, ZHANG X, LIU H L, et al. Reduction of energy requirement of CO₂ desorption from a rich CO₂-loaded MEA solution by using solid acid catalysts[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 202: 673-684.
47	ZHANG X W, LIU H L, LIANG Z W, et al. Reducing energy consumption of CO₂ desorption in CO₂-loaded aqueous amine solution using Al₂O₃/HZSM-5 bifunctional catalysts[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 229: 562-576.
48	ZHANG X W, HUANG Y F, GAO H X, et al. Zeolite catalyst-aided tri-solvent blend amine regeneration: an alternative pathway to reduce the energy consumption in amine-based CO₂ capture process[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 240: 827-841.
49	ZHANG X W, ZHANG R, LIU H L, et al. Evaluating CO₂ desorption performance in CO₂-loaded aqueous tri-solvent blend amines with and without solid acid catalysts[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 218: 417-429.
50	GAO H X, HUANG Y F, ZHANG X W, et al. Catalytic performance and mechanism of SO₄^2-/ZrO₂/SBA-15 catalyst for CO₂ desorption in CO₂-loaded monoethanolamine solution[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 259: 114179.
51	李强. 纳米流体强化传热机理研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2004.
	LI Qiang. Investigation on enhanced heat transfer of nanofluids[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2004.
52	LEE J W, TORRES PINEDA I, LEE J H, et al. Combined CO₂ absorption/regeneration performance enhancement by using nanoabsorbents[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 178: 164-176.
53	PANG C W, JUNG J Y, LEE J W, et al. Thermal conductivity measurement of methanol-based nanofluids with Al₂O₃ and SiO₂ nanoparticles[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2012, 55(21/22): 5597-5602.
54	LEE J S, LEE J W, KANG Y T. CO₂ absorption/regeneration enhancement in DI water with suspended nanoparticles for energy conversion application[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 143: 119-129.
55	WANG T, YU W, LIU F, et al. Enhanced CO₂ absorption and desorption by monoethanolamine (MEA)-based nanoparticle suspensions[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2016, 55(28): 7830-7838.
56	HAFIZI A, RAJABZADEH M, KHALIFEH R. Enhanced CO₂ absorption and desorption efficiency using DETA functionalized nanomagnetite/water nano-fluid[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2020, 8(4): 103845.
57	MURNANDARI A, KANG J M, YOUN M H, et al. Effect of process parameters on the CaCO₃ production in the single process for carbon capture and mineralization[J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2017, 34(3): 935-941.
58	LUO C, WU K J, YUE H R, et al. DBU-based CO₂ absorption-mineralization system: reaction process, feasibility and process intensification[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2020, 28(4): 1145-1155.
60	PARK S, JO H, KANG D, et al. A study of CO₂ precipitation method considering an ionic CO₂ and Ca(OH)₂ slurry[J]. Energy, 2014, 75: 624-629.
61	张卫风, 李娟, 王秋华. 响应面法优化解吸MDEA/PG富液中CO₂再生工艺[J/OL]. 过程工程学报: 1-10[2021-02-19]. .
	ZHANG Weifeng, LI Juan, WANG Qiuhua. Response surface methodology for optimizing CO₂ regeneration in MDEA/PG rich solutions[J/OL]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering: 1-10[2021-02-19]. .
62	YU B, LI K K, JI L, et al. Coupling a sterically hindered amine-based absorption and coal fly ash triggered amine regeneration: a high energy-saving process for CO₂ absorption and sequestration[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2019, 87: 58-65.
63	CHANG R, CHOI D, KIM M H, et al. Tuning crystal polymorphisms and structural investigation of precipitated calcium carbonates for CO₂ mineralization[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2017, 5(2): 1659-1667.
64	ARTI M, YOUN M H, PARK K T, et al. Single process for CO₂ capture and mineralization in various alkanolamines using calcium chloride[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(1): 763-769.
65	KANG J M, MURNANDARI A, YOUN M H, et al. Energy-efficient chemical regeneration of AMP using calcium hydroxide for operating carbon dioxide capture process[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 335: 338-344.
66	LYU B, GUO B S, ZHOU Z M, et al. Mechanisms of CO₂ capture into monoethanolamine solution with different CO₂ loading during the absorption/desorption processes[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(17): 10728-10735.
67	马伟春, 张卫风, 焦月潭, 等. 钙法解吸并固定乙醇胺富液中CO₂[J]. 环境科学学报, 2018, 38(1): 109-114.
	MA Weichun, ZHANG Weifeng, JIAO Yuetan, et al. Desorption and mineralization of CO₂ in monoethanolamine-rich solution by calcium method[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2018, 38(1): 109-114.
68	ARTI M, YOUN M H, PARK K T, et al. Single process for CO₂ capture and mineralization in various alkanolamines using calcium chloride[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(1): 763-769.
69	PARK S, MIN J, LEE M G, et al. Characteristics of CO₂ fixation by chemical conversion to carbonate salts[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 231: 287-293.
70	张卫风, 李娟, 王秋华. Ca(OH)₂解吸并固定混合吸收液中CO₂的实验研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2020, 40(4): 1436-1442.
	ZHANG Weifeng, LI Juan, WANG Qiuhua. Experimental study on desorption and mineralization of CO₂ in amine-rich solution[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2020, 40(4): 1436-1442.
71	LIU M S, GADIKOTA G. Single-step, low temperature and integrated CO₂ capture and conversion using sodium glycinate to produce calcium carbonate[J]. Fuel, 2020, 275: 117887.
72	HONG S J, SIM G, MOON S, et al. Low-temperature regeneration of amines integrated with production of structure-controlled calcium carbonates for combined CO₂ capture and utilization[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2020, 34(3): 3532-3539.
73	LIU M S, GADIKOTA G. Integrated CO₂ capture, conversion, and storage to produce calcium carbonate using an amine looping strategy[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2019, 33(3): 1722-1733.
74	JI L, YU H, LI K K, et al. Integrated absorption-mineralisation for low-energy CO₂ capture and sequestration[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 225: 356-366.
75	LIU Meishen, ASGAR Hassnain, SEIFERT Soenke, et al. Novel aqueous amine looping approach for the direct capture, conversion and storage of CO₂ to produce magnesium carbonate[J]. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 2020, 4(3): 1265-1275.

[1]	盛维武, 程永攀, 陈强, 李小婷, 魏嘉, 李琳鸽, 陈险峰. 微气泡和微液滴双强化脱硫反应器操作分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 142-147.
[2]	杨寒月, 孔令真, 陈家庆, 孙欢, 宋家恺, 王思诚, 孔标. 微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器脱碳性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 197-204.
[3]	王胜岩, 邓帅, 赵睿恺. 变电吸附二氧化碳捕集技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 233-245.
[4]	时永兴, 林刚, 孙晓航, 蒋韦庚, 乔大伟, 颜彬航. 二氧化碳加氢制甲醇过程中铜基催化剂活性位点研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 287-298.
[5]	郑谦, 官修帅, 靳山彪, 张长明, 张小超. 铈锆固溶体Ce_0.25Zr_0.75O₂光热协同催化CO₂与甲醇合成DMC[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 319-327.
[6]	戴欢涛, 曹苓玉, 游新秀, 徐浩亮, 汪涛, 项玮, 张学杨. 木质素浸渍柚子皮生物炭吸附CO₂特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 356-363.
[7]	孙玉玉, 蔡鑫磊, 汤吉海, 黄晶晶, 黄益平, 刘杰. 反应精馏合成甲基丙烯酸甲酯工艺优化及节能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 56-63.
[8]	王耀刚, 韩子姗, 高嘉辰, 王新宇, 李思琪, 杨全红, 翁哲. 铜基催化剂电还原二氧化碳选择性的调控策略[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4043-4057.
[9]	刘毅, 房强, 钟达忠, 赵强, 李晋平. Ag/Cu耦合催化剂的Cu晶面调控用于电催化二氧化碳还原[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4136-4142.
[10]	李洞, 王倩倩, 张亮, 李俊, 付乾, 朱恂, 廖强. 非水系纳米流体热再生液流电池串联堆性能特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4238-4246.
[11]	黄玉飞, 李子怡, 黄杨强, 金波, 罗潇, 梁志武. 光催化CO₂和CH₄重整催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4247-4263.
[12]	娄宝辉, 吴贤豪, 张驰, 陈臻, 冯向东. 纳米流体用于二氧化碳吸收分离研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3802-3815.
[13]	白亚迪, 邓帅, 赵睿恺, 赵力, 杨英霞. 变温吸附碳捕集机组标准化测试方案探讨及性能实验[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3834-3846.
[14]	薛凯, 王帅, 马金鹏, 胡晓阳, 种道彤, 王进仕, 严俊杰. 工业园区分布式综合能源系统的规划与调度[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3510-3519.
[15]	吕超, 张习文, 金理健, 杨林军. 新型两相吸收剂-离子液体系统高效捕获CO₂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3226-3232.

CO₂醇胺富液低能耗再生研究进展

Progress of research on regeneration of rich alkanolamine solution with low energy consumption

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 2

参考文献 75

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价