微氧EGSBBR产甲烷系统快速启动与微生物群落特性

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-0295

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为实现高有机废水产甲烷快速启动，本文采用微氧膨胀颗粒污泥床生物膜反应器（EGSBBR）处理2000mg/L化学需氧量（COD）有机废水，通过逐步缩短水力停留时间和增大反应区上升流速的方式，经过34天运行系统产甲烷成功启动，COD去除率从67.5%升高至94.2%，有机负荷达1.0kgCOD/(m³·d)，此时系统最大甲烷产量为582mL/d。产气量与出水pH和出水VFA浓度变化具有相关性，且污泥胞外聚合物（EPS）中的多糖、蛋白质浓度显著增加。高通量测序结果证实Methanothrix为系统产甲烷主要优势菌属，表明微氧条件甲烷产生主要通过乙酸脱羧途径形成。该研究为高浓度有机废水处理实现快速产甲烷提供了一种可借鉴的新工艺。

关键词: 微氧膨胀颗粒污泥床生物膜反应器, 启动, 产甲烷, 胞外聚合物, 微生物群落

Abstract:

To achieve rapid start-up of methanogenesis of high-concentration organic wastewater, an EGSBBR system was used to treat influent COD concentration of 2000mg/L. Methanation start-up was realized after 34 days operation through gradually shortening hydraulic retention time and increasing ascending flow velocity of the reaction zone, and the corresponding COD removal efficiency increased from 67.5% to 94.2% with the influent organic loading rate up to 1.0kgCOD/(m³·d) and the maximum methane yield of the system being 582mL/d. The methane production was correlated with the change of effluent pH and VFA concentration, and the concentrations of polysaccharide and protein in sludge EPS increased significantly. High-throughput sequencing revealed that Methanothrix was the main abundant genus, indicating that methane was mainly formed by the decarboxylation of acetic acid under microaerobic conditions. This study offers a novel reference process for rapidly achieving methanogenesis of high-strength organic wastewater treatment.

Key words: expanded granular sludge blanket biofilm reactor (EGSBBR), start-up, methanogenesis, EPS, microbial community

中图分类号:

X703

葛大令, 周鑫, RONELRudy Koubode, 阴泽阳, 张伟. 微氧EGSBBR产甲烷系统快速启动与微生物群落特性[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(12): 5203-5210.

Daling GE, Xin ZHOU, Rudy Koubode RONEL, Zeyang YIN, Wei ZHANG. Rapid start-up and microbial community characteristics of a micro-aerobic methane-producing EGSBBR system[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(12): 5203-5210.

参考文献

1	LIN Y C, NI C H, WU C Y, et al. A full-scale study of external circulation sludge bed (ECSB) system for anaerobic wastewater treatment in a whiskey distillery[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26(33): 34261-34276.
2	JEDDI M, KARRAY F, LOUKIL S, et al. Anaerobic biological treatment of industrial saline wastewater: fixed bed reactor performance and analysis of the microbial community structure and abundance[J]. Environmental Technology, 2020, 41(13): 1715-1725.
3	GUVEN H, DERELI R, OZGUN H, et al. Towards sustainable and energy efficient municipal wastewater treatment by up-concentration of organics[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2019, 70: 145-168.
4	李文卫, 俞汉青. 厌氧产能生物技术用于城市污水处理的研究进展[J]. Engineering, 2016, 2(4): 438-446.
4	LI Wenwei, YU Hanqing. Advances in energy-producing anaerobic biotechnologies for municipal wastewater treatment[J]. Engineering, 2016, 2(4): 438-446.
5	BREACH P A, SIMONOVIC S P. Wastewater treatment energy recovery potential for adaptation to global change: an integrated assessment[J]. Environmental Management, 2018, 61(4): 624-636.
6	XU W Y, FU S F, YANG Z M, et al. Improved methane production from corn straw by microaerobic pretreatment with a pure bacteria system[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 259: 18-23.
7	MONTALVO S, HUILI?IR C, OJEDA F, et al. Microaerobic pretreatment of sewage sludge: effect of air flow rate, pretreatment time and temperature on the aerobic process and methane generation[J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2016, 110: 1-7.
8	DUARTE M S, SILVA S, SALVADOR A, et al. Insight into the role of facultative bacteria stimulated by microaeration in continuous bioreactors converting lcfa to methane[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52(11): 6497-6507.
9	RUAN D, ZHOU Z, PANG H J, et al. Enhancing methane production of anaerobic sludge digestion by microaeration: enzyme activity stimulation, semi-continuous reactor validation and microbial community analysis[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 289: 121643.
10	董春娟, 冯美荣, 王海会, 等. 焦化废水驯化的EGSB反应器内颗粒污泥产甲烷活性[J]. 中国给水排水, 2010, 26(1): 32-35.
10	DONG Chunjuan, FENG Meirong, WANG Haihui, et al. Changes in methanogenic activity of granular sludge acclimated by coking wastewaterin EGSB reactor[J]. China Water &Wastewater, 2010, 26(1): 32-35.
11	HUSSAIN A, LEE J, REID R, et al. Upflow anaerobic-microaerobic fixed biofilm reactor integrating methanogenesis with partial nitrification[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 348: 281-291.
12	ZITOMER D H. Stoichiometry of combined aerobic and methanogenic cod transformation[J]. Water Research, 1998, 32(3): 669-676.
13	王刚, 闻韵, 海热提, 等. UASB处理高浓度畜禽养殖废水启动及产气性能研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2015, 38(1): 95-99.
13	WANG Gang, WEN Yun, Reti HAI, et al. Star-up and biogas production of UASB treating high concentration livestock wastewater[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 38(1): 95-99.
14	BASITERE M, WILLIAMS Y, SHELDON M, et al. Performance of an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSD) reactor coupled with anoxic and aerobic bioreactors for treating poultry slaughterhouse wastewater[J]. Water Practice and Technology, 2016, 11(1): 86-92.
15	刘健峰, 王强, 田光亮, 等. 膨胀颗粒污泥床厌氧反应器原废水循环启动的实验研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2017(1): 77-81.
15	LIU Jianfeng, WANG Qiang, TIAN Guangliang, et al. Study on start-up in circulation feed water of EGSB anaerobic reactor[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 2017(1): 77-81.
16	MISCHOPOULOU M, KALAMARAS S D, NAIDIS P, et al. Start-up and steady-state results of a UASB reactor treating high ph baker's yeast molasses wastewater for methane production[J]. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 2017, 92(4): 775-780.
17	刘肖, 张洁, 杨宗政, 等. UASB工艺处理造纸废水启动的研究[J]. 给水排水, 2016, 42(8): 74-78
17	LIU Xiao, ZHANG Jie, YANG Zongzheng, et al. Start up of UASB process for papermaking wastewater treatment[J]. Water &Wastewater Engineering, 2016, 42(8): 74-78.
18	DENG S, WANG L, SU H. Role and influence of extracellular polymeric substances on the preparation of aerobic granular sludge[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 173: 49-54.
19	宿程远, 卢宇翔, 覃菁菁, 等. 不同氨氮含量对厌氧颗粒污泥理化特性的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12): 4784-4792.
19	SU Chengyuan, LU Yuxiang, QIN Jingjing, et al. Effects of ammonia concentration on physico-chemical characteristics of anaerobic granular sludge[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(12): 4784-4792.
20	陈重军, 张海芹, 汪瑶琪, 等. 基于高通量测序的ABR 厌氧氨氧化反应器各隔室细菌群落特征分析[J]. 环境科学, 2016, 37(7): 2652-2658.
20	CHEN C J, ZHANG H Q, WANG Y Q, et al. Characteristics of microbial community in each compartment of abr anammox reactor based on high-throughput sequencing[J]. Environmental Science, 2016, 37(7): 2652-2658.
21	HOLMES D, SMITH J. Biologically produced methane as a renewable energy source[J]. Advances in Applied Microbiology, 2016, 97: 1-61.
22	LIU C, SUN D, ZHAO Z, et al. Methanothrix enhances biogas upgrading in microbial electrolysis cell via direct electron transfer[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 291: 121877.
23	YEE M, SNOEYENBOS W, THAMDRUP B, et al. Extracellular electron uptake by two methanosarcina species[J]. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2019, 7: 29.
24	YIN C, SHEN Y, YU Y, et al. In-situ biogas upgrading by a stepwise addition of ash additives: methanogen adaption and CO₂sequestration[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 282: 1-8.
25	KARABEY B, DAGLIOGLU S, AZBAR N, et al. Bacterial and archeal dynamics of a labscale hybrid gas fermentation bioreactor fed with CO₂ and H₂[J]. Journal of Environmental Science and Health A, 2019, 54(13): 1348-1355.
26	DE V J, SAUNDERS A, HE Y, et al. Ammonia and temperature determine potential clustering in the anaerobic digestion microbiome[J]. Water Research, 2015, 75: 312-323.
27	HAO L, BIZE A, CONTEAU D, et al. New insights into the key microbial phylotypes of anaerobic sludge digesters under different operational conditions[J]. Water Research, 2016, 102: 158-169.

[1]	徐茂淯, 陶帅, 齐聪, 梁林. 圆盘式环路热管的启动特性及温度波动[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4531-4537.
[2]	胡璇, 陈滢. 聚酯纤维微塑料胁迫下活性污泥系统性能及微生物群落的变化情况[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 1051-1060.
[3]	张涵, 张肖静, 马冰冰, 佴灿, 刘烁烁, 马永鹏, 宋亚丽. 以城市废弃污泥为种泥启动厌氧氨氧化工艺的可行性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 1080-1088.
[4]	祝佳欣, 朱雯喆, 徐俊, 谢靖, 王文标, 谢丽. 基于导电材料强化抗生素胁迫厌氧消化的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 1008-1019.
[5]	徐沛, 贾璇, 王勇, 亓雪娇, 赵玉娇, 李鸣晓. 流场对MEC生物阴极CO₂还原性能与产物的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(7): 3816-3823.
[6]	陈加波, 周鑫, 李旭. 以活性污泥为接种污泥厌氧氨氧化工艺的快速启动及脱氮效能[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(7): 3900-3907.
[7]	潘文政, 纪志永, 汪婧, 李淑明, 黄智辉, 郭小甫, 刘杰, 赵颖颖, 袁俊生. 微生物燃料电池处理偶氮含盐废水的产电性能和降解过程[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(6): 3306-3313.
[8]	汪宇光, 张星星, 王超超, 夏云康, 王垚, 周澄, 吴翼伶, 吴鹏, 徐乐中. 反硝化除磷+短程反硝化厌氧氨氧化工艺的深度脱氮除磷效能[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(4): 2191-2201.
[9]	敬双怡, 刘超, 蔡怡婷, 李卫平, 于玲红, 侯娜. 低温下磁性载体强化MBBR硝化性能及微生物群落分析[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(4): 2180-2190.
[10]	李冬, 高飞雁, 解一博, 李柱, 张杰. 有机负荷波动频次对好氧颗粒污泥的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(12): 6680-6688.
[11]	郭超, 冯奥, 陆信曜, 宗红, 诸葛斌. 重组大肠杆菌1,2,4-丁三醇合成途径的平衡优化[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(12): 6531-6539.
[12]	杨景瑞, 王莹, 陈虎, 吕永康. 氧浓度对调节NO _x 氧化度协同CABR法脱硝性能及菌群结构的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(11): 6139-6148.
[13]	潘柔杏, 于庆君, 唐晓龙, 易红宏, 高凤雨, 赵顺征, 周远松, 刘媛媛. 被动NO_x吸附剂在柴油车冷启动排放控制中的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(1): 400-417.
[14]	黄天川, 刘志祥. 质子交换膜燃料电池系统低温启动技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S1): 117-125.
[15]	陈露蕊, 曹利锋. 温度对厌氧耗氢产甲烷的影响研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S1): 326-333.