化工进展 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 4660-4667.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-0186

• 资源与环境化工 • 上一篇    下一篇

超低排放燃煤电厂中SO3的迁移及脱除特征

冯鹏(), 李正鸿, 刘鹤欣, 谭厚章, 张思聪, 卢旭超, 杨富鑫()   

  1. 西安交通大学热流科学与工程教育部重点实验室,陕西 西安 710049
  • 出版日期:2020-11-05 发布日期:2020-11-06
  • 通讯作者: 杨富鑫
  • 作者简介:冯鹏(1994—),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为燃煤电厂污染物排放特征。E-mail:fengpeng9858@stu.xjtu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2016YFB0600605)

Migration and removal characteristics of SO3 in ultra-low emission coal-fired power plant

Peng FENG(), Zhenghong LI, Hexin LIU, Houzhang TAN, Sicong ZHANG, Xuchao LU, Fuxin YANG()   

  1. MOE Key Laboratory of Thermo-Fluid Science and Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, Shaanxi, China
  • Online:2020-11-05 Published:2020-11-06
  • Contact: Fuxin YANG

摘要:

燃煤烟气中的SO3会对机组运行及大气环境造成不利影响。为研究燃煤电厂SO3排放特征,本文采取异丙醇吸收法对某300MW超低排放机组污染物控制装置进出口SO3采样,以分析SO3在燃煤机组中的迁移及脱除特性。结果表明:炉膛燃烧过程以及选择性催化还原装置(selective catalytic reduction,SCR)均将部分SO2转化为SO3,炉膛燃烧生成SO3的质量浓度为SO2的0.86%,SCR内SO2/SO3转化率为0.45%。烟气经过空气预热器,SO3浓度降低了5.7%;静电除尘器(electrostatic precipitator,ESP)脱除SO3效果较差,主要由于ESP内烟温在110℃以上,H2SO4酸雾凝结量较少;双级湿法脱硫装置(wet flue gas desulfurization,WFGD)对SO3脱除效率达到81.3%,比国内单级脱硫装置SO3脱除效果高30%~50%;湿式静电除尘器(wet electrostatic precipitator,WESP)脱除SO3效率为23.0%。机组烟囱排放SO3质量浓度为2.025mg/m3(标准),SO3排放因子EF为0.034kg/t。

关键词: 燃煤机组, 三氧化硫, 超低排放, 脱除特性, 排放因子

Abstract:

SO3 in coal-fired flue gas could cause negative effects on the operation of power plants and the atmospheric environment. To further understand the SO3 emission from coal-fired power plants, SO3 was sampled by isopropanol absorption method at the inlet and outlet of each air pollution control device of a 300MW ultra-low emission unit. The migration and removal characteristics of SO3 was analyzed. The results showed that both of combustion process and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) could converted SO2 into SO3. The mass concentration of SO3 generated in the combustion process accounted for 0.86% of SO2 and the conversion rate of SO2/SO3 in SCR was 0.45%. The SO3 concentration was reduced by 5.7% with an air preheater. The removal efficiency of SO3 by electrostatic precipitator (ESP) was not satisfactory because the temperature of the flue gas in ESP was above 110℃, which resulted in a less condensation amount of H2SO4 acid mist. The removal efficiency of SO3 by the two-stage desulfurization tower was 81.3%, which was 30%—50% higher than that of single stage desulfurization tower. The SO3 removal efficiency by wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP) was 23%. The SO3 emission mass concentration of coal-fired power plant was 2.025mg/m3 with an emission factor EFcoal of 0.034kg/t.

Key words: coal-fired power plant, sulfur trioxide, ultra-low emission, removal characteristics, emission factor

中图分类号: 

京ICP备12046843号-2;京公网安备 11010102001994号
版权所有 © 《化工进展》编辑部
地址:北京市东城区青年湖南街13号 邮编:100011
电子信箱:hgjz@cip.com.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn