弧叶搅拌器不同桨叶直径下混合性能受转速和高度的影响程度分析

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-1207

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了探究转速和安装高度对不同搅拌桨直径混合性能的影响程度，以弧叶搅拌器为研究对象，采用Realizable k-ε湍流模型和欧拉多相流模型进行数值计算，对比分析了不同搅拌桨直径在不同安装高度和转速下的混合时间、单位体积混合能、功率、固相颗粒分布、湍动能以及速度流场分布情况。结果表明：当搅拌桨直径增加时，转速对混合时间和固相颗粒运动的影响程度先减小后增加，对功率、湍动能以及介质流速的影响程度增加，对单位体积混合能无明显影响；当搅拌桨直径增加时，安装高度对混合时间和固相颗粒运动的影响程度先减小后增加再减小，搅拌桨直径为400mm时影响程度最大，对功率、湍动能以及介质流速无明显影响；当安装高度低于H/3时，随着搅拌桨直径的增加，高度对单位体积混合能的影响程度先增加后减小，反之，高度对单位体积混合能的影响程度增加。该研究可以在一定程度上说明搅拌桨直径在设计参数发生变化时对流场的影响程度，能够为机械搅拌提供理论指导，具有一定的工程应用意义。

关键词: 搅拌桨直径, 混合性能, 固相颗粒, 搅拌, 混合

Abstract:

In order to explore the influence of rotational speed height and installation on the mixing performance of different impeller diameters, the Realizable k-ε turbulence model and the Euler multiphase flow model were used for numerical calculation. The mixing time, mixing energy per unit volume, power, solid particle distribution, turbulent kinetic energy and velocity flow field distribution of different impeller diameters at different installation heights and rotational speeds were compared and analyzed. The results showed that when the diameter of the impeller increased, the influence of the rotational speed on the mixing time and the movement of the solid particles decreased first and then increased, and the influence on the power, turbulent kinetic energy and medium flow rate increased, and there was no obvious effect on the mixing energy per unit volume. When the diameter of the impeller increases, the influence of the installation height on the mixing time and the movement of the solid particles decreased first, then increased and then decreased. When the diameter of the impeller was 400mm, the influence was the greatest, and there was no significant effect on the power, turbulent kinetic energy and medium flow rate. When the installation height was lower than H/3, the degree of influence of height on the mixing energy per unit volume increased and then decreased as the diameter of the mixing paddle increased, and conversely, the degree of influence of height on the mixing energy per unit volume increased. On the contrary, the influence of height on the mixing energy per unit volume increased. This study can explain the influence of the impeller diameter on the flow field to a certain extent when the design parameters changed. It could provide theoretical guidance for mechanical stirring and had certain engineering application significance.

Key words: diameter of stirring paddle, mixing performance, solid phase particles, stirring, mixing

中图分类号:

TQ051.1

马玲岩, 黎义斌, 周欢, 帖星宇, 赵任胜, 周文寒. 弧叶搅拌器不同桨叶直径下混合性能受转速和高度的影响程度分析[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(8): 4283-4296.

MA Lingyan, LI Yibin, ZHOU Huan, TIE Xingyu, ZHAO Rensheng, ZHOU Wenhan. Analysis of the influence of rotational speed and height on the mixing performance under different blade diameters of arc-blade agitator[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024, 43(8): 4283-4296.

图/表 20

图1 立式反应釜结构示意图（a）反应釜容器；（b）弧叶搅拌器俯视图；（c）弧叶搅拌器右视图

表1 300mm弧叶搅拌器设计参数

设计参数	设计尺寸/mm
轮毂半径	25
搅拌轴半径	15
叶片厚度	4
最大叶片宽度	35
叶片尖端宽度	30
最大叶片宽度距中心轴距离	38

图2 网格生成图

图3 网格的无关性验证

图4 搅拌反应釜试验台

表2 主要测试设备参数信息

名称	型号	出厂	输出
扭矩传感器	MCK—H001	北京海博华科技有限公司	60脉冲/r
搅拌伺服电机	ECM-B3M-F21830RS1	DELTA台达-中达电通股份有限公司	3kW
升降伺服电机	ECMA-CA0604SS	DELTA台达-中达电通股份有限公司	3kW

图5 水和聚氯乙烯搅拌过程

图6 数值计算结果与试验结果对比曲线

图7 不同搅拌桨直径下混合时间随转速变化曲线

图8 不同搅拌桨直径下功率随转速变化曲线

图9 不同搅拌桨直径下单位体积混合能随转速变化曲线

图10 t=25s时不同搅拌桨直径下固相体积分数随转速变化云图

图11 t=30s时不同搅拌桨直径下湍动能随转速变化云图

图12 t=30s时不同搅拌桨直径下速度随转速变化云图

图13 不同搅拌桨直径下混合时间随高度变化曲线

图14 不同搅拌桨直径下功率随高度变化曲线

图15 不同搅拌桨直径下单位体积混合能随高度变化曲线

图16 t=30s时不同搅拌桨直径下固相体积分数随高度变化云图

图17 t=30s时不同搅拌桨直径下湍动能随高度变化云图

图18 t=30s时不同搅拌桨直径下速度随高度变化云图

参考文献 19

1	ANNAS Sven, ELFERING Michael, JANTZEN Hans-Arno, et al. Experimental analysis of mixing-processes in biogas plants[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2022, 258: 117767.
2	YAP C Y, Ian PATTERSON W, CARREAU P J. Mixing with helical ribbon agitators: Part Ⅲ. Non-Newtonian fluids[J]. AIChE Journal, 1979, 25(3): 516-521.
3	CHENG Haiying, LUO Zhun, YONG Liang. Reliability analysis of mixer structure under mixing simulation[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2021, 1043(2): 022020.
4	CHANDRATILLEKE G R, DONG K J, SHEN Y S. DEM study of the effect of blade-support spokes on mixing performance in a ribbon mixer[J]. Powder Technology, 2018, 326: 123-136.
5	李芦雨. 组合式搪玻璃搅拌器流场特性研究[D]. 常州: 常州大学, 2022.
	LI Luyu. Study on flow field characteristics of combined glass lined agitator[D]. CHangzhou: Changzhou University, 2022.
6	何鹏, 唐萍, 漆鑫, 等. 固定功率下铁水搅拌喷吹脱硫桨的直径与转速优化研究[J]. 炼钢, 2022, 38(5): 16-22, 30.
	HE Peng, TANG Ping, QI Xin, et al. Study on optimization of impeller diameter and rotation speed of hot metal stirring and injection desulfurization under certain power[J]. Steelmaking, 2022, 38(5): 16-22, 30.
7	郭扬扬. 搅拌槽转轮半径及安装高度对气—液两相流影响的数值模拟[D]. 西安: 西安理工大学, 2018.
	GUO Yangyang. Numerical simulation of the effect of radius of impeller and its installation depth on gas-liquid two-phase flow in A stirred tank[D]. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Technology, 2018.
8	WANG Hao, ZHOU Peijian, CHEN Ting, et al. Optimization of liquid–liquid mixing in a novel mixer based on hybrid SVR-DE model[J]. Energies, 2023, 16(4): 1808.
9	TAN Yuan, DAHLENBURG Maximilian, FOTTNER Johannes, et al. Influencing factors of the mixing performance of a near-nozzle continuous mixer for 3D concrete printing: An analysis based on spatial Lacey mixing index (SLMI)[J]. Powder Technology, 2022, 403: 117414.
10	ZHANG Huimin, LIAO Huiliang. Structure optimization of open turbine type agitator[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 1082: 284-287.
11	Christian HÖFELS, DAMBACH Regina, KWADE Arno. Geometry influence on optimized operation of a dry agitator bead mill[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2021, 171: 107050.
12	FADEYIBI A, AINA S J, BUSARI R A, et al. Optimization of operation parameters of a developed dough mixer[J]. Lautech Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2020, 14(2): 36-48.
13	SHU Lei, YANG Mingjin, ZHAO Hang, et al. Process optimization in a stirred tank bioreactor based on CFD-Taguchi method: A case study[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 230: 1074-1084.
14	JIANG Hongwan, YUAN Sen, LIU Hao, et al. Numerical analysis and optimization of key parts in the stirred tank based on solid-liquid flow field[J]. Science Progress, 2022, 105(1): 003685042110672.
15	YIN Cuicui, HE Jiazhen, XIONG Yongnan, et al. Improved suspension quality and liquid level stability in stirred tanks with Rotor-Stator agitator based on CFD simulation[J]. Particuology, 2023, 82: 64-75.
16	YUE Xiangcheng, SHI Yan. Flow characteristics analysis of a new combination agitator based on CFD[J]. Academic Journal of Science and Technology, 2023, 5(1): 120-125.
17	中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会. 桨式搅拌器: [S]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2006.
	National Development and Reform Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Paddle impeller: [S]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2006.
18	中华人民共和国工业和信息化部. 机械搅拌设备: [S]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2014.
	Ministry of Industry and Information of the People’s Republic of China. Mechanical mixing equipment: [S]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2014.
19	王福军. 水泵与泵站流动分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2020: 49.
	WANG Fujun. Analysis method of flow in pumps & pumping stations[M]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2020: 49.

[1]	殷晨阳, 刘永峰, 陈睿哲, 张璐, 宋金瓯, 刘海峰. 基于量子化学计算的正己烷热解反应动力学模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(8): 4273-4282.
[2]	郑锁祺, 詹凌霄, 陈恒, 李志浩, 王禹瑞, 赵宁, 吴昊, 杨林军. 基于混合模型的脱硫废水旁路蒸发系统能耗特性[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(6): 2968-2976.
[3]	王涛, 高翔, 高继峰, 邓海全, 余显涌, 周振华, 唐玲, 吕航. 改性Cu-BTC基混合基质膜在CO₂分离中的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(6): 3240-3246.
[4]	吕青檐, 高汉文, 谢昆谕, 范冬青, 黄龙, 陈志强. 废弃有机物用于混合菌群合成PHA的利用现状与挑战[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(6): 3374-3385.
[5]	苗诒贺, 王耀祖, 刘雨杭, 朱炫灿, 李佳, 于立军. 添加剂改性固态胺吸附剂用于碳捕集的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(5): 2739-2759.
[6]	禹言芳, 石博文, 孟辉波, 丁鹏程, 姚云娟. 基于CFD-DEM算法的气力输送气固两相流特性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(3): 1133-1144.
[7]	禹言芳, 丁鹏程, 孟辉波, 石博文, 姚云娟. 非牛顿流体在叶片式静态混合器中的传热强化特性[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(3): 1145-1156.
[8]	李京, 方庆, 周文浩, 吴国良, 王家辉, 张华, 倪红卫. 挡板构型对含钒页岩浸出槽内多相流行为的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(2): 619-627.
[9]	闫子涵, 王栋栋, 阴慧敏, 刘文瑞, 卢春喜. 射流与气固两相流混合过程的测试与分析方法[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(2): 713-721.
[10]	苏梦军, 刘剑, 辛靖, 陈禹霏, 张海洪, 韩龙年, 朱元宝, 李洪宝. 气液混合强化在固定床加氢过程中的应用进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(1): 100-110.
[11]	杜翠花, 张茜, 王晓东, 黄伟, 周明. 用于C₃H₆/N₂分离的PDA@PEBA2533膜的制备[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(1): 437-446.
[12]	杨寒月, 孔令真, 陈家庆, 孙欢, 宋家恺, 王思诚, 孔标. 微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器脱碳性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 197-204.
[13]	谢璐垚, 陈崧哲, 王来军, 张平. 用于SO₂去极化电解制氢的铂基催化剂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 299-309.
[14]	赵曦, 马浩然, 李平, 黄爱玲. 错位碰撞型微混合器混合性能的模拟分析与优化设计[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4559-4572.
[15]	王松松, 刘培乔, 陶长元, 王运东, 陈恩之, 苗迎彬, 赵风轩, 刘作华. 工业物联网技术在搅拌反应器领域的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3331-3339.