燃煤耦合可再生燃料电厂抗中毒脱硝催化剂研究进展

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-0126

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

“双碳”背景下，燃煤机组减污降碳需求迫切，与可再生燃料耦合发电可提高能源利用水平，降低碳排放量，不同燃料的特性导致掺烧后的烟气特征复杂，对脱硝催化剂提出新的挑战。本文简要回顾了脱硝催化剂反应过程机理，综合阐述了掺烧可再生燃料后的锅炉烟气对脱硝催化剂的催化过程影响，并详细讨论了不同中毒元素对脱硝催化剂催化活性的作用影响机制，然后重点综合了现有的不同抗中毒研究，提出了多种催化剂抗中毒设计策略，本文也对未来抗中毒催化剂的发展趋势进行了阐述，应更加明晰掺烧工况对催化剂的中毒影响、增强多掺烧场景可适性，通过工艺改进提高工业产品成品率和质量，最终助力火电机组实现低碳经济发展。

关键词: 再生能源, 减污降碳, 抗中毒, 催化剂

Abstract:

Under the background of Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutralization, the demand for pollution and carbon reduction of coal-fired units is urgent. Co-fired coupled directly with renewable fuel for power generation can not only reduce carbon emissions, but also significantly improve energy utilization level. However, the characteristics of different fuels lead to complex flue gas characteristics after co-combustion, which poses new challenges to SCR catalysts. The article briefly reviews the reaction mechanism of the SCR catalysts, comprehensively elucidates the influence of boiler flue gas after burning co-fired renewable fuels on the catalytic process of SCR catalyst, and discusses in detail the effects of different poisons on the catalytic activity of SCR catalysts. Then, various anti-poisoning strategies for catalyst design are proposed based on different anti-poisoning researches. This paper also expounds the development trend of anti-poisoning catalysts in the future. To achieve low-carbon economic development of thermal power units, it is necessary to clarify the poisoning effect of co-combustion conditions on catalysts, enhance the adaptability of multi-co-combustion scenarios, and improve the yield and quality of industrial products through process improvement.

Key words: renewable energy, pollutants degradation and carbon dioxide reduction, anti-poisoning, catalysts

中图分类号:

X701

周佳丽, 马子然, 李歌, 赵春林, 王红妍, 王磊. 燃煤耦合可再生燃料电厂抗中毒脱硝催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(12): 6286-6300.

ZHOU Jiali, MA Ziran, LI Ge, ZHAO Chunlin, WANG Hongyan, WANG Lei. Research progress on anti-poisoning of SCR catalysts in flue gas of coal and renewable fuel co-fired power plant[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(12): 6286-6300.

图/表 14

参考文献 89

1	陈志董，林育超，刘铭宇，等. 污泥干燥及其与燃煤电站耦合的热力特性分析[J]. 热力发电， 2022， 51(5): 55-64.
	CHEN Zhidong， LIN Yuchao， LIU Mingyu， et al. Thermodynamic characteristic analysis of sewage sludge drying and its integration with coal-fired power plant[J]. Thermal Power Generation， 2022， 51(5): 55-64.
2	左克祥，张秀峰. 大型燃煤机组污泥耦合发电技术研究与应用[J]. 电力科技与环保， 2022， 38(4): 317-325
	ZUO Kexiang， ZHANG Xiufeng. Research and application of sludge coupling power generation technology for large coal-fired units[J]. Electric Power Technology and Environmental Protection， 2022， 38(4): 317-325
3	张自丽. 循环流化床锅炉燃煤耦合污泥技术研究与展望[J]. 热力发电， 2020， 49(5): 7-13.
	ZHANG Zili. Research and prospect of coal-fired and sludge-coupled technologies in CFB boilers[J]. Thermal Power Generation， 2020， 49(5): 7-13.
4	李春建，曾澄光，段小云，等. 煤与木屑掺烧的燃烧特性与污染物排放规律[J]. 能源与节能， 2022(6): 6-9， 127.
	LI Chunjian， ZENG Chengguang， DUAN Xiaoyun， et al. Co-combustion characteristics and pollutant emission regularity of coal and sawdust[J]. Energy and Energy Conservation， 2022(6): 6-9， 127.
5	董阳. 掺烧玉米秸秆对污泥灰磷形态转变的影响研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学， 2022.
	DONG Yang. Study on the effect of corn straw on the transformation of phosphorus form in sludge ash[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University， 2022.
6	Nan-Yu TOPSØE. Mechanism of the selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide by ammonia elucidated by in situ on-line Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy[J]. Science， 1994， 265(5176): 1217-1219.
7	杜凯敏，秦刚华，祁志福，等. NH₃-SCR脱硝催化剂的中毒及其抗毒策略[J]. 现代化工， 2021， 41(11): 58-62.
	DU Kaimin， QIN Ganghua， QI Zhifu， et al. Poisoning of NH₃-SCR denitrification catalyst and resistance strategy[J]. Modern Chemical Industry， 2021， 41(11): 58-62.
8	穆林，李通，王震，等. 藻类和木质生物质与烟煤掺混燃烧结渣特性[J]. 可再生能源， 2022， 40(2)： 143-151
	MU Lin， LI Tong， WANG Zhen， et al. Slag formation characteristics of co-combustion of bituminous coal with algae and woody biomass[J]. Renewable Energy Resources， 2022， 40(2)： 143-151
9	ZHENG Yuanjing， JENSEN Anker Degn， JOHNSSON Jan Erik. Deactivation of V₂O₅-WO₃-TiO₂ SCR catalyst at a biomass-fired combined heat and power plant[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental， 2005， 60(3/4): 253-264.
10	LI Xiang， LI Xiansheng， YANG Ralph T， et al. The poisoning effects of calcium on V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ catalyst for the SCR reaction: Comparison of different forms of calcium[J]. Molecular Catalysis， 2017， 434: 16-24.
11	LI Junhua， PENG Yue， CHANG Huazhen， et al. Chemical poison and regeneration of SCR catalysts for NO _x removal from stationary source[J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering， 2016， 10(3): 413-427.
12	DU Xuesen， GAO Xiang， QIU Kunzan， et al. The reaction of poisonous alkali oxides with vanadia SCR catalyst and the afterward influence: A DFT and experimental study[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C， 2015， 119(4): 1905-1912.
13	NICOSIA D， ĈZEKAJ I， KRÖCHER O. Chemical deactivation of V₂O₅/WO₃-TiO₂ SCR catalysts by additives and impurities from fuels， lubrication oils， and urea solution[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental， 2008， 77(3/4): 228-236.
14	PENG Yue， LI Junhua， CHEN Liang， et al. Alkali metal poisoning of a CeO₂-WO₃ catalyst used in the selective catalytic reduction of NO _x with NH₃: An experimental and theoretical study[J]. Environmental Science & Technology， 2012， 46(5): 2864-2869.
15	YANG Xinfang， ZHAO Bo， ZHUO Yuqun， et al. DRIFTS study of ammonia activation over CaO and sulfated CaO for NO reduction by NH₃ [J]. Environmental Science & Technology， 2011， 45(3): 1147-1151.
16	林凡. 钒钛基脱硝催化剂抗碱金属中毒机理研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学， 2017.
	LIN Fan. Mechanism of anti-alkali metal poisoning of vanadium-titanium-based denitrification catalyst[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University， 2017.
17	PENG Yue， LI Junhua， HUANG Xu， et al. Deactivation mechanism of potassium on the V₂O₅/CeO₂ catalysts for SCR reaction: Acidity， reducibility and adsorbed-NO _x [J]. Environmental Science & Technology， 2014， 48(8): 4515-4520.
18	Ki Bok NAM， Jong Hyeon YEO， HONG Sung Chang. Study of the phosphorus deactivation effect and resistance of vanadium-based catalysts[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research， 2019， 58(41): 18930-18941.
19	CAO Jun， ROHANI Sohrab， LIU Weizao， et al. Influence of phosphorus on the NH₃-SCR performance of CeO₂-TiO₂ catalyst for NO _x removal from co-incineration flue gas of domestic waste and municipal sludge[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science， 2022， 610: 463-473.
20	HUANG Li， ZENG Yiqing， CHANG Zhengfeng， et al. Promotional effect of phosphorus modification on improving the Na resistance of V₂O₅-MoO₃/TiO₂ catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NO _x by NH₃ [J]. Molecular Catalysis， 2021， 506: 111565.
21	LI Mingyuan， GUO Ruitang， HU Changxing， et al. The enhanced resistance to K deactivation of Ce/TiO₂ catalyst for NH₃-SCR reaction by the modification with P[J]. Applied Surface Science， 2018， 436: 814-822.
22	WANG Yan， YU Jianglong， WANG Zhihua， et al. A review on arsenic removal from coal combustion: Advances， challenges and opportunities[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal， 2021， 414: 128785.
23	LU Qiang， PEI Xinqi， WU Yangwen， et al. Deactivation mechanism of the commercial V₂O₅-MoO₃/TiO₂ selective catalytic reduction catalyst by arsenic poisoning in coal-fired power plants[J]. Energy & Fuels， 2020， 34(4): 4865-4873.
24	PENG Yue， LI Junhua， SI Wenzhe， et al. Insight into deactivation of commercial SCR catalyst by arsenic: An experiment and DFT study[J]. Environmental Science & Technology， 2014， 48(23): 13895-13900.
25	LIU Zhong， HAN Jian， ZHAO Li， et al. Effects of Se and SeO₂ on the denitrification performance of V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ SCR catalyst[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General， 2019， 587: 117263.
26	霍丽丽，赵立欣，郝彦辉，等. 国内外生物质成型燃料质量标准现状[J]. 农业工程学报， 2020， 36(9): 245-254.
	HUO Lili， ZHAO Lixin， HAO Yanhui， et al. Quality standard system of densified biomass fuels at home and abroad[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering， 2020， 36(9): 245-254.
27	CHEN J P， BUZANOWSKI M A， YANG R T， et al. Deactivation of the vanadia catalyst in the selective catalytic reduction process[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association， 1990， 40(10): 1403-1409.
28	LIU Shuaiwei， GUO Ruitang， SUN Xiao， et al. The deactivation effect of Cl on V/TiO₂ catalyst for NH₃-SCR process: A DRIFT study[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute， 2019， 92(5): 1610-1617.
29	YANG Ningzhi， GUO Ruitang， PAN Weiguo， et al. The deactivation mechanism of Cl on Ce/TiO₂ catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH₃ [J]. Applied Surface Science， 2016， 378: 513-518.
30	DENG Lei， ZHU Zhengrong， WANG Yikun， et al. Deactivation influence of HF on the V₂O₅-WO₃-TiO₂ SCR catalyst[J]. Energy & Fuels， 2021， 35(5): 4377-4386.
31	YANG Yang， XU Wenqing， WU Yinghong， et al. Inhibition effect of HBr over a commercial V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ catalyst in a NH₃-SCR process[J]. Catalysis Communications， 2017， 94: 82-85.
32	MIAO Jifa， LI Huirong， SU Qingfa， et al. The combined promotive effect of SO₂ and HCl on Pb-poisoned commercial NH₃-SCR V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ catalysts[J]. Catalysis Communications， 2019， 125: 118-122.
33	BARRER R M， KANELLOPOULOS A G. The sorption of ammonium chloride vapour in zeolites. Part Ⅰ. Hydrogen chloride and ammonia[J]. Journal of the Chemical Society A: Inorganic， Physical， Theoretical， 1970: 765.
34	CHOUNG Jin Woo， In-Sik NAM. Characteristics of copper ion exchanged mordenite catalyst deactivated by HCl for the reduction of NO _x with NH₃ [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental， 2006， 64(1/2): 42-50.
35	ZHANG Xiaoyang， FANG Beibei， CUI Lin， et al. Effects of HCl and O₂ on Hg⁰ oxidation in the SCR catalyst[J]. Energy & Fuels， 2021， 35(14): 11382-11392.
36	ZHAO Li， LIU Yu， WU Yangwen， et al. Mechanism of heterogeneous mercury oxidation by HCl on V₂O₅(001) surface[J]. Current Applied Physics， 2018， 18(6): 626-632.
37	李春建，段小云，曾澄光，等. 煤掺混污泥的燃烧特性及排放规律[J]. 工业炉， 2022， 44(3): 20-25.
	LI Chunjian， DUAN Xiaoyun， ZENG Chengguang， et al. Combustion characteristics and emission law of coal mixed sludge[J]. Industrial Furnace， 2022， 44(3): 20-25.
38	翟胜兵，李伟，王明昊，等. 旋流燃烧器生物质掺烧试验研究[J]. 锅炉制造， 2020(6): 14-17.
	ZHAI Shengbing， LI Wei， WANG Minghao， et al. Experimental study on the pulverized coal-biomass swirling burner[J]. Boiler Manufacturing， 2020(6): 14-17.
39	XU Liwen， WANG Chizhong， CHANG Huazhen， et al. New insight into SO₂ poisoning and regeneration of CeO₂-WO₃/TiO₂ and V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ catalysts for low-temperature NH₃-SCR[J]. Environmental Science & Technology， 2018， 52 (12): 7064-7071.
40	PENG Yue， WANG Dong， LI Bing， et al. Impacts of Pb and SO₂ poisoning on CeO₂-WO₃/TiO₂-SiO₂ SCR catalyst[J]. Environmental Science & Technology， 2017， 51(20): 11943-11949.
41	PAN Siwei， LUO Hongcheng， LI Li， et al. H₂O and SO₂ deactivation mechanism of MnO _x /MWCNTs for low-temperature SCR of NO _x with NH₃ [J]. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical， 2013， 377: 154-161.
42	Yujin EOM， JEON Seok Ho， Thanh An NGO， et al. Heterogeneous mercury reaction on a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst[J]. Catalysis Letters， 2008， 121(3): 219-225.
43	YANG Jian， YANG Qiang， SUN Jian， et al. Effects of mercury oxidation on V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ catalyst properties in NH₃-SCR process[J]. Catalysis Communications， 2015， 59: 78-82.
44	刘强，杨洋，秦福初. 钒钛基SCR催化剂的制备及其汞中毒机理研究[J]. 当代化工研究， 2019(1): 168-169.
	LIU Qiang， YANG Yang， QIN Fuchu. Preparation of vanadium-titanium-based SCR catalyst and the research on its mercury poisoning mechanism[J]. Modern Chemical Research， 2019(1): 168-169.
45	KONG Ming， LIU Qingcai， JIANG Lijun， et al. Property influence and poisoning mechanism of HgCl₂ on V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ SCR-DeNO _x catalysts[J]. Catalysis Communications， 2016， 85: 34-38.
46	KHODAYARI Raziyeh， C U Ingemar ODENBRAND. Deactivating effects of lead on the selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide with ammonia over a V₂O₅/WO₃/TiO₂ catalyst for waste incineration applications[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research， 1998， 37(4): 1196-1202.
47	PENG Yue， SI Wenzhe， LI Xiang， et al. Investigation of the poisoning mechanism of lead on the CeO₂—WO₃ catalyst for the NH₃-SCR reaction via in situ IR and Raman spectroscopy measurement[J]. Environmental Science & Technology， 2016， 50(17): 9576-9582.
48	WU Yangwen， ZHOU Xinyue， CAI Qi， et al. Intrinsic mechanism insight of the interaction between lead species and the Vanadium-based catalysts based on First-principles investigation[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science， 2022， 607: 1362-1372.
49	GAO Xiang， DU Xuesen， FU Yincheng， et al. Theoretical and experimental study on the deactivation of V₂O₅ based catalyst by lead for selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxides[J]. Catalysis Today， 2011， 175(1): 625-630.
50	潘有春，金奇杰，沈岳松，等. Sm³⁺掺入对MnO₂/TiO₂催化剂低温脱硝性能的影响[J]. 应用化工， 2019， 48(1): 38-42， 47.
	PAN Youchun， JIN Qijie， SHEN Yuesong， et al. Effect of Sm³⁺ on catalytic performance of MnO₂/TiO₂ catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NO at low temperature[J]. Applied Chemical Industry， 2019， 48(1): 38-42， 47.
51	GONG Pijun， HE Feng， FANG De， et al. In-situ DRIFTS study on the k-poisoning resistance mechanism of titanium bearing blast furnace slag catalyst by Sm/La doping[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering， 2022， 10(3): 107895.
52	CHEN Qilin， GUO Ruitang， WANG Qingshan， et al. The promotion effect of Co doping on the K resistance of Mn/TiO₂ catalyst for NH₃-SCR of NO[J]. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers， 2016， 64: 116-123.
53	ZHU Baozhong， ZI Zhaohui， SUN Yunlan， et al. Enhancing low-temperature SCR de-NO _x and alkali metal poisoning resistance of a 3Mn₁₀Fe/Ni catalyst by adding Co[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology， 2019， 9(12): 3214-3225.
54	YANG Ningzhi， GUO Ruitang， PAN Weiguo， et al. The promotion effect of Sb on the Na resistance of Mn/TiO₂ catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH₃ [J]. Fuel， 2016， 169: 87-92.
55	KHAN Mehak Nawaz， HAN Lupeng， WANG Penglu， et al. Tailored alkali resistance of DeNO _x catalysts by improving redox properties and activating adsorbed reactive species[J]. iScience， 2020， 23(6): 101173.
56	YAN Zidi， SHI Xiaoyan， YU Yunbo， et al. Alkali resistance promotion of Ce-doped vanadium-titanic-based NH₃-SCR catalysts[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences， 2018， 73: 155-161.
57	PENG Yue， LI Junhua， SI Wenzhe， et al. Ceria promotion on the potassium resistance of MnO _x /TiO₂ SCR catalysts: An experimental and DFT study[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal， 2015， 269: 44-50.
58	ZHAO Wanxia， RONG Jing， LUO Wen， et al. Enhancing the K-poisoning resistance of CeO₂-SnO₂ catalyst by hydrothermal method for NH₃-SCR reaction[J]. Applied Surface Science， 2022， 579: 152176.
59	XUE Hongyan， MENG Tao， LIU Fangfang， et al. Enhanced resistance to calcium poisoning on Zr-modified Cu/ZSM-5 catalysts for the selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH₃ [J]. RSC Advances， 2019， 9(66): 38477-38485.
60	LI Xiang， LI Xiansheng， LI Junhua， et al. High calcium resistance of CeO₂-WO₃ SCR catalysts: Structure investigation and deactivation analysis[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal， 2017， 317: 70-79.
61	WANG Jiaqing， XING Yi， SU Wei， et al. Promotional effect of Sn additive on the chlorine resistance over SnMnO _x /LDO catalysts for synergistic removal of NO _x and o-DCB[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology， 2022， 12(12): 3863-3873.
62	高翔，骆仲泱，岑可法，等. 用于选择性催化还原氮氧化物的V-Sb-Nb/Ti催化剂及制备方法: CN101862651A[P]. 2010-10-20.
	GAO Xiang， LUO Zhongyang， CEN Kefa， et al. V-Sb-Nb for selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides Ti catalyst and preparation method: CN101862651A[P]. 2010-10-20.
63	陆强，胡斌. 一种具有抗砷中毒性能的SCR脱硝催化剂及其制备方法: CN108160069B[P]. 2020-07-14.
	LU Qiang, HU Bin. A SCR denitration catalyst with arsenic poisoning resistance and its preparation method: CN108160069B[P]. 2020-07-14.
64	LI Gehua， MAO Dongsen， CHAO Mengxi， et al. Significantly enhanced Pb resistance of a Co-modified Mn-Ce-O _x /TiO₂ catalyst for low-temperature NH₃-SCR of NO _x [J]. Catalysis Science & Technology， 2020， 10(18): 6368-6377.
65	徐托雨，蔡思翔. 硫酸化改性对TiO₂负载的铈基脱硝催化剂的活性及抗碱金属性能的影响[J]. 北京化工大学学报(自然科学版)， 2021， 48(1): 25-33.
	XU Tuoyu， CAI Sixiang. Effect of sulfation on the activity and alkali resistance of TiO₂-supported cerium-based deNO _x catalysts[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology (Natural Science Edition)， 2021， 48(1): 25-33.
66	ZHA Kaiwen， FENG Chong， HAN Lupeng， et al. Promotional effects of Fe on manganese oxide octahedral molecular sieves for alkali-resistant catalytic reduction of NO _x : XAFS and in situ DRIFTs study[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal， 2020， 381: 122764.
67	GAO Shan， WANG Penglu， CHEN Xiongbo， et al. Enhanced alkali resistance of CeO₂/SO₄ ^2--ZrO₂ catalyst in selective catalytic reduction of NO _x by ammonia[J]. Catalysis Communications， 2014， 43: 223-226.
68	SKOTTE Johannes， BOGHOSIAN Soghomon， KUSTOV Arkady， et al. Vanadia-based SCR catalysts supported on tungstated and sulfated zirconia: Influence of doping with potassium[J]. Journal of Catalysis， 2007， 251(2): 459-473.
69	KUSTOV A L， RASMUSSEN S B， FEHRMANN R， et al. Activity and deactivation of sulphated TiO₂- and ZrO₂-based V， Cu， and Fe oxide catalysts for NO abatement in alkali containing flue gases[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental， 2007， 76(1/2): 9-14.
70	PUTLURU Siva Sankar Reddy， MOSSIN Susanne， RIISAGER Anders， et al. Heteropoly acid promoted Cu and Fe catalysts for the selective catalytic reduction of NO with ammonia[J]. Catalysis Today， 2011， 176(1): 292-297.
71	ZHENG Yang， GUO Yangyang， SHAN Wenpo， et al. Revealing the Ca resistance enhancement mechanism for the NH₃-SCR reaction over VTi catalyst by CuO modification[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General， 2022， 637: 118606.
72	HU Wenshuo， ZHANG Yuhong， LIU Shaojun， et al. Improvement in activity and alkali resistance of a novel V-Ce(SO₄)₂/Ti catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH₃ [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental， 2017， 206: 449-460.
73	WANG Penglu， YAN Lijun， GU Yundong， et al. Poisoning-resistant NO _x reduction in the presence of alkaline and heavy metals over H-SAPO-34-supported Ce-promoted Cu-based catalysts[J]. Environmental Science & Technology， 2020， 54(10): 6396-6405.
74	KANG Lin， HAN Lupeng， HE Jiebing， et al. Improved NO _x reduction in the presence of SO₂ by using Fe₂O₃-promoted halloysite-supported CeO₂-WO₃ catalysts[J]. Environmental Science & Technology， 2019， 53(2): 938-945.
75	李想. 一种提升抗砷中毒性能的脱硝催化剂及其制备方法和应用: CN108435159A[P]. 2021-06-04.
	LI Xiang. Denitration catalyst for improving arsenic poisoning resistance as well as preparation method and application of denitration catalyst: CN108435159A[P]. 2021-06-04.
76	黄锐，刘红辉，平原，等. 一种适用于高砷烟气的蜂窝式脱硝催化剂及其制备方法: CN106179319B[P]. 2019-03-29.
	HUANG Rui， LIU Honghui， PING Yuan， et al. Honeycomb de-nitration catalyst suitable for high-arsenic fume and preparation method of honeycomb de-nitration catalyst: CN106179319B[P]. 2019-03-29.
77	ZHAN Sihui， ZHANG He， ZHANG Yu， et al. Efficient NH₃-SCR removal of NO _x with highly ordered mesoporous WO₃(χ)-CeO₂ at low temperatures[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental， 2017， 203: 199-209.
78	HUANG Chunying， GUO Ruitang， PAN Weiguo， et al. SCR of NO _x by NH₃ over MnFeOx@TiO₂ catalyst with a core-shell structure: The improved K resistance[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute， 2019， 92(5): 1364-1378.
79	HUANG Zhiwei， LI Hao， GAO Jiayi， et al. Alkali- and sulfur-resistant tungsten-based catalysts for NO _x emissions control[J]. Environmental Science & Technology， 2015， 49(24): 14460-14465.
80	HU Pingping， HUANG Zhiwei， GU Xiao， et al. Alkali-resistant mechanism of a hollandite deNO _x catalyst[J]. Environmental Science & Technology， 2015， 49(11): 7042-7047.
81	WANG Penglu， WANG Haiqiang， CHEN Xiongbo， et al. Novel SCR catalyst with superior alkaline resistance performance: Enhanced self-protection originated from modifying protonated titanate nanotubes[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A， 2015， 3(2): 680-690.
82	CHANG Huazhen， ZHANG Tao， DANG Hao， et al. Fe₂O₃@SiTi core-shell catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NO _x with NH₃: Activity improvement and HCl tolerance[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology， 2018， 8(13): 3313-3320.
83	吴忠标，王芃芦，王海强，等. 一种具有抗中毒性能的氧化钒纳米管脱硝催化剂及其制备方法: CN106140146B[P]. 2018-09-11.
	WU Zhongbiao， WANG Penglu， WANG Haiqiang， et al. Vanadium oxide nanotube denitration catalyst with anti-poisoning performance and preparation method of catalyst: CN106140146B[P]. 2018-09-11.
84	张登松，施利毅，查凯文，等. 抗碱金属中毒的脱硝催化剂及其制备方法: CN108607602B[P]. 2021-12-03.
	ZHANG Dengsong， SHI Liyi， ZHA Kaiwen， et al. Denitration catalyst capable of resisting alkali metal poisoning and preparation method thereof: CN108607602B[P]. 2021-12-03.
85	胡小夫，汪洋，耿宣，等. 一种抗砷抗碱金属中毒的SCR脱硝催化剂及其制备方法: CN109603814B[P]. 2021-11-09.
	HU Xiaofu， WANG Yang， GENG Xuan， et al. Arsenism and alkalosis resistant SCR denitration catalyst and preparing method thereof: CN109603814B[P]. 2021-11-09.
86	陆强，裴鑫琦，吴洋文，等. 一种薄壁蜂窝式低温抗硫SCR脱硝催化剂及其制备方法: CN110354843B[P]. 2020-09-22.
	LU Qiang， PEI Xinqi， WU Yangwen， et al. Thin-wall honeycomb type low-temperature sulfur-resistant SCR denitration catalyst and preparation method thereof: CN110354843B[P]. 2020-09-22.
87	曾红，刘平乐，张喻升，等. 表面涂覆型低温脱硝催化剂的开发与中试应用[J]. 过程工程学报， 2017， 17(6): 1208-1216.
	ZENG Hong， LIU Pingle， ZHANG Yusheng， et al. Development and pilot test of surface-coating SCR denitration catalyst at low temperature[J]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering， 2017， 17(6): 1208-1216.
88	李歌，王宝冬，马子然，等. 氢化TiO2脱硝催化剂及其制备方法和应用: CN110743581A[P]. 2020-02-04.
	LI Ge， WANG Baodong， MA Ziran， et al. Hydrogenated-TiO catalyst for denitration and preparation method and application of hydrogenated-TiO catalyst: CN110743581A[P]. 2020-02-04.
89	LI Ge， WANG Baodong， MA Ziran， et al. An anti-poisoning defective catalyst without metal active sites for NH₃-SCR via in situ stabilization[J]. EES Catalysis， 2023， 1(2): 134-143.

[1]	张明焱, 刘燕, 张雪婷, 刘亚科, 李从举, 张秀玲. 非贵金属双功能催化剂在锌空气电池研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 276-286.
[2]	时永兴, 林刚, 孙晓航, 蒋韦庚, 乔大伟, 颜彬航. 二氧化碳加氢制甲醇过程中铜基催化剂活性位点研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 287-298.
[3]	谢璐垚, 陈崧哲, 王来军, 张平. 用于SO₂去极化电解制氢的铂基催化剂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 299-309.
[4]	杨霞珍, 彭伊凡, 刘化章, 霍超. 熔铁催化剂活性相的调控及其费托反应性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 310-318.
[5]	王乐乐, 杨万荣, 姚燕, 刘涛, 何川, 刘逍, 苏胜, 孔凡海, 朱仓海, 向军. SCR脱硝催化剂掺废特性及性能影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 489-497.
[6]	邓丽萍, 时好雨, 刘霄龙, 陈瑶姬, 严晶颖. 非贵金属改性钒钛基催化剂NH₃-SCR脱硝协同控制VOCs[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 542-548.
[7]	程涛, 崔瑞利, 宋俊男, 张天琪, 张耘赫, 梁世杰, 朴实. 渣油加氢装置杂质沉积规律与压降升高机理分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4616-4627.
[8]	王鹏, 史会兵, 赵德明, 冯保林, 陈倩, 杨妲. 过渡金属催化氯代物的羰基化反应研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4649-4666.
[9]	张启, 赵红, 荣峻峰. 质子交换膜燃料电池中氧还原反应抗毒性电催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4677-4691.
[10]	王伟涛, 鲍婷玉, 姜旭禄, 何珍红, 王宽, 杨阳, 刘昭铁. 醛酮树脂基非金属催化剂催化氧气氧化苯制备苯酚[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4706-4715.
[11]	葛亚粉, 孙宇, 肖鹏, 刘琦, 刘波, 孙成蓥, 巩雁军. 分子筛去除VOCs的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4716-4730.
[12]	吴海波, 王希仑, 方岩雄, 纪红兵. 3D打印催化材料开发与应用进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3956-3964.
[13]	向阳, 黄寻, 魏子栋. 电催化有机合成反应的活性和选择性调控研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4005-4014.
[14]	王耀刚, 韩子姗, 高嘉辰, 王新宇, 李思琪, 杨全红, 翁哲. 铜基催化剂电还原二氧化碳选择性的调控策略[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4043-4057.
[15]	刘毅, 房强, 钟达忠, 赵强, 李晋平. Ag/Cu耦合催化剂的Cu晶面调控用于电催化二氧化碳还原[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4136-4142.