风力发电制氢与氢气网络耦合系统的氢气波动平抑特性分析

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-2379

化工进展 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11): 6071-6078.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-2379

风力发电制氢与氢气网络耦合系统的氢气波动平抑特性分析

韩儒松¹(), 蒋迎花¹, 康丽霞¹^,², 刘永忠¹^,²^,³()

^1.西安交通大学化工系，陕西西安 710049
^2.陕西省能源化工过程强化重点实验室，陕西西安 710049
^3.热流科学与工程教育部重点实验室，陕西西安 710049

收稿日期:2020-11-27 修回日期:2021-03-25 出版日期:2021-11-05 发布日期:2021-11-19
通讯作者: 刘永忠
作者简介:韩儒松（1996—），男，硕士研究生，研究方向为化工系统工程。E-mail：hanrsg@stu.xjtu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(21878240)

Analysis of fluctuation suppressing characteristics for hydrogen network coupled with wind power generation system

HAN Rusong¹(), JIANG Yinghua¹, KANG Lixia¹^,², LIU Yongzhong¹^,²^,³()

^1.Department of Chemical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, Shaanxi, China
^2.Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Energy Chemical Process Intensification, Xi’an 710049, Shaanxi, China
^3.Key Laboratory of Thermo-Fluid Science and Engineering, Xi’an 710049, Shaanxi, China

Received:2020-11-27 Revised:2021-03-25 Online:2021-11-05 Published:2021-11-19
Contact: LIU Yongzhong

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

将可再生能源发电制氢集成于炼厂氢气系统中，不仅可替代部分氢气公用工程以满足炼厂的氢气需求，同时也可为炼厂中旋转设备提供电能，但可再生能源发电制氢的波动性将影响氢气网络的稳定运行。为了探究风力发电制氢与氢气网络集成中两个子系统平抑风能波动的特性，本文构建了集成风力发电制氢的氢气网络数学优化分析模型，研究了氢气网络平抑风力发电制氢波动的经济性和系统结构特性。研究表明，为了适应可再生能源发电制氢的波动，氢气网络需要更加复杂的网络结构，且风力发电制氢输出的电力和氢气经储能电池和氢气储罐的缓冲调节后仍存在较大波动，氢气网络仍需通过调节公用工程和燃气系统来实现氢气网络的稳定运行。

关键词: 风力发电, 氢气网络, 平抑波动, 数学规划, 优化

Abstract:

Integrating renewable energy system into a hydrogen network can replace a part of hydrogen utility to meet the hydrogen demand in a refinery. Meanwhile, it also provides electricity for the rotating equipment in the refinery. However, the fluctuation of hydrogen will affect the stable operation of the hydrogen network. To explore the characteristics of the two subsystems in suppressing fluctuations of wind power generation, a mathematical programming model for the hydrogen network integrated with wind power to hydrogen system is established to investigate the economy and structure characteristics of the hydrogen network for suppressing the fluctuations of the hydrogen stream from wind power generation. The results show that, to accommodate fluctuations, a more complex structure of the hydrogen network is required. The power and hydrogen outputs from the wind power generation system still fluctuate greatly after the batteries and hydrogen storage tanks buffering. It is critical to adjust the flowrate of hydrogen utility and fuel gas system to achieve stable operation of the hydrogen network.

Key words: wind power generation, hydrogen network, suppressing fluctuation, mathematical programming, optimization

中图分类号:

TQ021.8

韩儒松, 蒋迎花, 康丽霞, 刘永忠. 风力发电制氢与氢气网络耦合系统的氢气波动平抑特性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(11): 6071-6078.

HAN Rusong, JIANG Yinghua, KANG Lixia, LIU Yongzhong. Analysis of fluctuation suppressing characteristics for hydrogen network coupled with wind power generation system[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(11): 6071-6078.

图/表 11

参考文献 17

1	SULEMAN F, DINCER I, AGELIN-CHAAB M. Comparative impact assessment study of various hydrogen production methods in terms of emissions[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(19): 8364-8375.
2	SCHIEBAHN S, GRUBE T, ROBINIUS M, et al. Power to gas: technological overview, systems analysis and economic assessment for a case study in Germany[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(12): 4285-4294.
3	ZHOU Z, ZHANG J Y, LIU P, et al. A two-stage stochastic programming model for the optimal design of distributed energy systems[J]. Applied Energy, 2013, 103: 135-144.
4	GABRIELLI P, GAZZANI M, MARTELLI E, et al. Optimal design of multi-energy systems with seasonal storage[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 219: 408-424.
5	CHEN Q Q, LYU M, GU Y, et al. Hybrid energy system for a coal-based chemical industry[J]. Joule, 2018, 2(4): 607-620.
6	PALYS M J, KUZNETSOV A, TALLAKSEN J, et al. A novel system for ammonia-based sustainable energy and agriculture: concept and design optimization[J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 2019, 140: 11-21.
7	ALLMAN A, DAOUTIDIS P, TIFFANY D, et al. A framework for ammonia supply chain optimization incorporating conventional and renewable generation[J]. AIChE Journal, 2017, 63(10): 4390-4402.
8	KIM M, KIM J. An integrated decision support model for design and operation of a wind-based hydrogen supply system[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(7): 3899-3915.
9	DE OLATEJU B, MONDS J, KUMAR A. Large scale hydrogen production from wind energy for the upgrading of bitumen from oil sands[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 118: 48-56.
10	王靖, 康丽霞, 刘永忠. 化工系统消纳可再生能源的电-氢协调储能系统优化设计[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(3): 1131-1142.
	WANG Jing, KANG Lixia, LIU Yongzhong. Optimal design of electricity-hydrogen energy storage systems for renewable energy penetrating into chemical process systems[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(3): 1131-1142.
11	DAGDOUGUI H, OUAMMI A, SACILE R. Modelling and control of hydrogen and energy flows in a network of green hydrogen refuelling stations powered by mixed renewable energy systems[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(6): 5360-5371.
12	WALKER S, MUKHERJEE U, FOWLER M, et al. Implementing power-to-gas to provide green hydrogen to a bitumen upgrader[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2016, 40(14): 1925-1934.
13	AL-SUBAIE A, MAROUFMASHAT A, ELKAMEL A, et al. Presenting the implementation of power-to-gas to an oil refinery as a way to reduce carbon intensity of petroleum fuels[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(30): 19376-19388.
14	VIVAS F J, DE LAS HERAS A, SEGURA F, et al. A review of energy management strategies for renewable hybrid energy systems with hydrogen backup[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 82: 126-155.
15	WU S D, LIU G L, YU Z M, et al. Optimization of hydrogen networks with constraints on hydrogen concentration and pure hydrogen load considered[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2012, 90(9): 1208-1220.
16	ELKAMEL A, ALHAJRI I, ALMANSOORI A, et al. Integration of hydrogen management in refinery planning with rigorous process models and product quality specifications[J]. International Journal of Process Systems Engineering, 2011, 1(3/4): 302.
17	YI J H, KO W, PARK J K, et al. Impact of carbon emission constraint on design of small scale multi-energy system[J]. Energy, 2018, 161: 792-808.

项目	容量	效率	SOC下限	SOC上限
风力发电机	10⁶kW	—	—	—
锂离子电池	5×10⁴kW·h	90%	0.05	0.9
氢气储罐	5×10⁸kW·h	100%	0	0.9
电解槽	3.5×10⁵kW	70%	—	—

项目	容量	效率	SOC下限	SOC上限
风力发电机	10⁶kW	—	—	—
锂离子电池	5×10⁴kW·h	90%	0.05	0.9
氢气储罐	5×10⁸kW·h	100%	0	0.9
电解槽	3.5×10⁵kW	70%	—	—

氢源与氢阱	流率/mol?s^-1	氢气纯度	压力/MPa
HU	1115.0	0.95	2.1
s1（CRU）	216.0	0.80	2.1
s2（HCU）	113.6	0.80	8.3
s3（GOHT）	144.8	0.75	2.4
s4（RHT）	80.8	0.75	2.8
s5（DHT）	20.0	0.70	2.4
s6（NHT）	31.2	0.65	1.4
k1（HCU）	521.0	0.95	13.8
k2（GOHT）	486.7	0.93	3.4
k3（RHT）	246.7	0.90	4.1
k4（DHT）	75.8	0.80	3.4
k5（NHT）	54.7	0.75	2.1

氢源与氢阱	流率/mol?s^-1	氢气纯度	压力/MPa
HU	1115.0	0.95	2.1
s1（CRU）	216.0	0.80	2.1
s2（HCU）	113.6	0.80	8.3
s3（GOHT）	144.8	0.75	2.4
s4（RHT）	80.8	0.75	2.8
s5（DHT）	20.0	0.70	2.4
s6（NHT）	31.2	0.65	1.4
k1（HCU）	521.0	0.95	13.8
k2（GOHT）	486.7	0.93	3.4
k3（RHT）	246.7	0.90	4.1
k4（DHT）	75.8	0.80	3.4
k5（NHT）	54.7	0.75	2.1

项目	基础案例	引入风电制氢的氢气网络
年度化总费用/USD	7.37×10⁷	3.57×10⁷
氢气公用工程费用/USD	8.08×10⁷	4.50×10⁷
电网购电费用/USD	8.15×10⁶	0
压缩机投资和运维费用/USD	2.53×10⁶	2.41×10⁶
燃气收益/USD	-1.79×10⁷	-1.18×10⁷

风力发电制氢与氢气网络耦合系统的氢气波动平抑特性分析

Analysis of fluctuation suppressing characteristics for hydrogen network coupled with wind power generation system

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 17

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

氢源	k1	k2	k3	k4	k5	燃气系统
RE	308.8	0~486.7	—	—	—	—
HU	109.2	159.4~428.3	0~164.5	—	—	—
s1	—	58.4~68.6	71.6	75.8	0~54.7	0~13.9
s2	102.9	—	10.7	—	—	—
s3	—	—	—	—	0~54.7	90.1~144.8
s4	—	0~45.6	—	—	0~54.7	0~80.8
s5	—	—	—	—	—	20.0
s6	—	—	—	—	—	31.2

[1]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[2]	王福安. 300kt/a环氧丙烷工艺反应器降耗减排分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 213-218.
[3]	张瑞杰, 刘志林, 王俊文, 张玮, 韩德求, 李婷, 邹雄. 水冷式复叠制冷系统的在线动态模拟与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 124-132.
[4]	李梦圆, 郭凡, 李群生. 聚乙烯醇生产中回收工段第三、第四精馏塔的模拟与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 113-123.
[5]	孙玉玉, 蔡鑫磊, 汤吉海, 黄晶晶, 黄益平, 刘杰. 反应精馏合成甲基丙烯酸甲酯工艺优化及节能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 56-63.
[6]	王正坤, 黎四芳. 双子表面活性剂癸炔二醇的绿色合成[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 400-410.
[7]	李春利, 韩晓光, 刘加朋, 王亚涛, 王晨希, 王洪海, 彭胜. 填料塔液体分布器的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4479-4495.
[8]	刘炫麟, 王驿凯, 戴苏洲, 殷勇高. 热泵中氨基甲酸铵分解反应特性及反应器结构优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4522-4530.
[9]	王晨, 白浩良, 康雪. 大功率UV-LED散热与纳米TiO₂光催化酸性红26耦合系统性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4905-4916.
[10]	李蓝宇, 黄新烨, 王笑楠, 邱彤. 化工科研范式智能化转型的思考与展望[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3325-3330.
[11]	林海, 王彧斐. 考虑噪声约束的分布式风场布局优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3394-3403.
[12]	周龙大, 赵立新, 徐保蕊, 张爽, 刘琳. 电场-旋流耦合强化多相介质分离研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3443-3456.
[13]	薛凯, 王帅, 马金鹏, 胡晓阳, 种道彤, 王进仕, 严俊杰. 工业园区分布式综合能源系统的规划与调度[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3510-3519.
[14]	李海东, 杨远坤, 郭姝姝, 汪本金, 岳婷婷, 傅开彬, 王哲, 何守琴, 姚俊, 谌书. 炭化与焙烧温度对植物基铁碳微电解材料去除As(Ⅲ)性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3652-3663.
[15]	侯殿保, 贺茂勇, 陈育刚, 杨海云, 李海民. 资源优化配置与循环经济在钾资源开发利用中的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3197-3208.