非热等离子体催化转化C1分子及其催化剂研究进展

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-1958

化工进展 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 3034-3045.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-1958

非热等离子体催化转化C₁分子及其催化剂研究进展

陈焕浩¹(), 范晓雷²()

^1.南京工业大学化工学院，材料化学工程国家重点实验室，江苏南京 210009
^2.曼彻斯特大学工程学院，化学工程与分析科学系，英国曼彻斯特 M13 9PL

收稿日期:2020-09-25 修回日期:2021-01-01 出版日期:2021-06-06 发布日期:2021-06-22
通讯作者: 陈焕浩
作者简介:范晓雷，博士，教授，博士生导师，研究方向为低温等离子体催化。xiaolei.fan@manchester.ac.uk。
基金资助:
江苏特聘教授人才项目;国家自然科学基金青年科学基金(22008109);材料化学工程国家重点实验室项目(ZK202001);欧盟“地平线2020”研究与创新基金(872102);欧盟“玛丽居里”行动基金(748196)

Review on non-thermal plasma (NTP) catalytic conversion of C₁ molecules and its catalysts

CHEN Huanhao¹(), FAN Xiaolei²()

^1.State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, China
^2.Department of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science, School of Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom

Received:2020-09-25 Revised:2021-01-01 Online:2021-06-06 Published:2021-06-22
Contact: CHEN Huanhao

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

非热等离子体催化具有反应条件温和、启动快和反应器结构紧凑等特点，在C₁分子催化转化领域（如CO₂加氢、甲烷活化、水煤气变换反应和甲醇重整制氢）有着广阔的应用前景。具体来说，等离子体特有的高能电子可在气相中快速活化稳定性极强的C₁分子并生成活性物质，接着与催化剂结合发生表面化学反应，从而实现常温常压下C₁分子的高效转化。然而，等离子体与催化剂之间的协同作用机制以及催化机理极为复杂，仍有待进一步研究。本综述简单介绍了非热等离子体催化转化C₁分子的近期研究进展，重点探讨了适用于非热等离子体的催化剂研究以及催化机理的高级原位表征。最后，提出了非热等离子体催化转化C₁分子的未来发展方向：①设计并构筑适用于非热等离子体催化的高效催化剂，并研究其构效关系；②发展高级原位表征技术，揭示活性物质的作用机理以及催化机理；③设计并构建高效的等离子体催化反应器，并建立反应器的理论模型和数值模拟方法，科学指导等离子体反应器的设计、优化和放大。

关键词: 非热等离子体, 催化剂, C₁分子, 催化机理, 原位表征

Abstract:

Non-thermal plasma (NTP) activated heterogeneous catalyst (i.e. NTP-catalysis) systems have many advantages, such as mild reaction conditions, faster response, and possible compact reactor configuration, presenting wide application foreground in the catalytic transformation of single-carbon (C₁) molecules [CO₂ hydrogenation, methane activation, water-gas shift (WGS) reaction, and methanol-reforming for hydrogen (H₂) production]. In detail, the high energy electron of plasma can quickly activate C₁ molecules in the gas-phase to generate reactive species, which will interact with the heterogeneous catalyst to ignite surface chemical reaction, and hence efficiently catalytic conversion of C₁ molecules under mild conditions. However, the synergic mechanism between plasma and catalyst, as well as relevant catalytic reaction mechanisms, are highly complex, which require further investigation. This review briefly presents the state-of-the-art of NTP-catalysis for catalytic conversion of C₁ molecules. Specific attention focuses on ①the design and development of bespoke heterogeneous catalysts for NTP-catalytic conversions of C₁ molecules and ② mechanistic investigations of catalytic conversions of C₁ molecules under NTP conditions using advanced in situ characterization methods. Additionally, future perspectives of NTP-catalysis are also proposed in this review including ① the design and development of tailor-made catalysts for NTP-catalysis, and study their structure-reactivity relationships, ② the development of advanced in situ characterization techniques for gaining further insights into the function mechanisms of active species and the catalytic reaction mechanisms, ③ the design and development of highly efficient plasma catalytic reactor, and the development of theoretical model and numerical simulation method for developed reactor, providing the scientific guidance of the design, optimization and scaling-up of plasma catalytic reactor.

Key words: non-thermal plasma (NTP), catalyst, C₁ molecule, catalytic mechanism, in situ characterization

中图分类号:

陈焕浩, 范晓雷. 非热等离子体催化转化C₁分子及其催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(6): 3034-3045.

CHEN Huanhao, FAN Xiaolei. Review on non-thermal plasma (NTP) catalytic conversion of C₁ molecules and its catalysts[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(6): 3034-3045.

图/表 4

参考文献 85

1	WANG W, WANG S P, MA X B, et al. Recent advances in catalytic hydrogenation of carbon dioxide[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2011, 40(7): 3703-3727.
2	ZHOU W, CHENG K, KANG J C, et al. New horizon in C₁ chemistry: breaking the selectivity limitation in transformation of syngas and hydrogenation of CO₂ into hydrocarbon chemicals and fuels[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2019, 48(12): 3193-3228.
3	ZHANG Q, YU J H, CORMA A. Applications of zeolites to C₁ chemistry: recent advances, challenges, and opportunities[J]. Advanced Materials, 2020, 32(44): 2002927.
4	DURME J VAN, DEWULF J, LEYS C, et al. Combining non-thermal plasma with heterogeneous catalysis in waste gas treatment: a review[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2008, 78(3/4): 324-333.
5	NEYTS E C, OSTRIKOV K K, SUNKARA M K, et al. Plasma catalysis: synergistic effects at the nanoscale[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2015, 115(24): 13408-13446.
6	WHITEHEAD J C. Plasma catalysis: challenges and future perspectives[M]. Plasma Catalysis. Berlin: Springer, 2019: 343-348.
7	WHITEHEAD J C. Plasma-catalysis: is it just a question of scale?[J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2019, 13(2): 264-273.
8	王爱华. 等离子体协同催化技术处理挥发性有机物的研究[D]. 北京: 北京工业大学, 2015.
	WANG Aihua. Removal of volatile organic compounds by plasma coupled with catalyst[D]. Beijing: BeijingUniversity of Technology, 2015.
9	陈鹏, 陶雷, 谢怡冰, 等. 低温等离子体协同催化降解挥发性有机物的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(9): 4284-4294.
	CHEN Peng, TAO Lei, XIE Yibing, et al. Non-thermal plasma cooperating catalyst degradation of the volatile organic compounds: a review[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(9): 4284-4294.
10	梁文俊, 李坚, 李依丽, 等. 低温等离子体技术处理挥发性有机物的研究进展[J]. 电站系统工程, 2005, 21(3): 7-9.
	LIANG Wenjun, LI Jian, LI Yili, et al. Progress in decomposition of VOCs by nonthermal plasma technology[J]. Power System Engineering, 2005, 21(3): 7-9.
11	王健壮, 贾春玲, 吴爽, 等. 低温等离子体技术在恶臭治理方面的研究进展[J]. 环境科技, 2013, 26(3): 74-78.
	WANG Jianzhuang, JIA Chunling, WU Shuang, et al. The research progress of non-thermal plasma in dealing with odor pollution[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2013, 26(3): 74-78.
12	MA S M, ZHAO Y C, YANG J P, et al. Research progress of pollutants removal from coal-fired flue gas using non-thermal plasma[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 67: 791-810.
13	GEORGE A, SHEN B X, CRAVEN M, et al. A review of non-thermal plasma technology: a novel solution for CO₂ conversion and utilization[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 135: 109702.
14	NIKOO K M, AMIN N A S, NOSHADI I. A review of methanol production from methane oxidation via non-thermal plasma reactor[J]. World Academy of Science: Engineering and Technology, 2010, 62: 354-358.
15	CUI W G, ZHANG G Y, HU T L, et al. Metal-organic framework-based heterogeneous catalysts for the conversion of C₁ chemistry: CO, CO₂ and CH₄[J]. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 2019, 387: 79-120.
16	FRONTERA P, MACARIO A, FERRARO M, et al. Supported catalysts for CO₂ methanation: a review[J]. Catalysts, 2017, 7(12): 59.
17	WANG W, DUONG-VIET C, XU Z X, et al. CO₂ methanation under dynamic operational mode using nickel nanoparticles decorated carbon felt (Ni/OCF) combined with inductive heating[J]. Catalysis Today, 2020, 357: 214-220.
18	DE MASI D, ASENSIO J M, FAZZINI P F, et al. Engineering iron-nickel nanoparticles for magnetically induced CO₂ methanation in continuous flow[J]. Angewandte Chemie: International Edition, 2020, 59(15): 6187-6191.
19	BUELENS L C, GALVITA V V, POELMAN H, et al. Super-dry reforming of methane intensifies CO₂ utilization via Le Chatelier’s principle[J]. Science, 2016, 354(6311): 449-452.
20	SONG Y, OZDEMIR E, RAMESH S, et al. Dry reforming of methane by stable Ni-Mo nanocatalysts on single-crystalline MgO[J]. Science, 2020, 367(6479): 777-781.
21	LIU Z, ZHANG F, RUI N, et al. Highly active ceria-supported Ru catalyst for the dry reforming of methane: in situ identification of Ru^δ⁺-Ce³⁺ interactions for enhanced conversion[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2019, 9(4): 3349-3359.
22	STERE C E, ANDERSON J A, CHANSAI S, et al. Non-thermal plasma activation of gold-based catalysts for low-temperature water-gas shift catalysis[J]. Angewandte Chemie: International Edition, 2017, 56(20): 5579-5583.
23	XU S J, CHANSAI S, STERE C, et al. Sustaining metal-organic frameworks for water-gas shift catalysis by non-thermal plasma[J]. Nature Catalysis, 2019, 2(2): 142-148.
24	LEE D H, KIM T. Plasma-catalyst hybrid methanol-steam reforming for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(14): 6039-6043.
25	MARTIN O, MARTÍN A J, MONDELLI C, et al. Indium oxide as a superior catalyst for methanol synthesis by CO₂ hydrogenation[J]. Angewandte Chemie: International Edition, 2016, 55(21): 6261-6265.
26	ZHANG Z H, WANG S S, SONG R, et al. The most active Cu facet for low-temperature water gas shift reaction[J]. Nature Communications, 2017, 8: 488.
27	CHEN H H, MU Y B, SHAO Y, et al. Nonthermal plasma (NTP) activated metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) catalyst for catalytic CO₂ hydrogenation[J]. AIChE Journal, 2020, 66(4): e16853.
28	CHEN H H, MU Y B, SHAO Y, et al. Coupling non-thermal plasma with Ni catalysts supported on BETA zeolite for catalytic CO₂ methanation[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2019, 9(15): 4135-4145.
29	WANG L, YI Y H, GUO H C, et al. Atmospheric pressure and room temperature synthesis of methanol through plasma-catalytic hydrogenation of CO₂[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2018, 8(1): 90-100.
30	ELIASSON B, SIMON F G, EGLI W. Hydrogenation of CO₂ in a silent discharge[M]. Non-Thermal Plasma Techniques for Pollution Control. Berlin: Springer, 1993: 321-337.
31	ELIASSON B, KOGELSCHATZ U, XUE B Z, et al. Hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to methanol with a discharge-activated catalyst[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1998, 37(8): 3350-3357.
32	KONDRATENKO E V, PEPPEL T, SEEBURG D, et al. Methane conversion into different hydrocarbons or oxygenates: current status and future perspectives in catalyst development and reactor operation[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2017, 7(2): 366-381.
33	MOREJUDO S H, ZANÓN R, ESCOLÁSTICO S, et al. Direct conversion of methane to aromatics in a catalytic co-ionic membrane reactor[J]. Science, 2016, 353(6299): 563-566.
34	TAIFAN W, BALTRUSAITIS J. CH₄ conversion to value added products: potential, limitations and extensions of a single step heterogeneous catalysis[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2016, 198: 525-547.
35	GIBSON E K, STERE C E, CURRAN-MCATEER B, et al. Probing the role of a non-thermal plasma (NTP) in the hybrid NTP catalytic oxidation of methane[J]. Angewandte Chemie: International Edition, 2017, 56(32): 9351-9355.
36	KIM J, GO D B, HICKS J C. Synergistic effects of plasma-catalyst interactions for CH₄ activation[J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2017, 19(20): 13010-13021.
37	AGHAMIR F M, MATIN N S, JALILI A H, et al. Conversion of methane to methanol in an ac dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 2004, 13(4): 707-711.
38	INDARTO A. A review of direct methane conversion to methanol by dielectric barrier discharge[C]//IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 2008, 15(4): 1038-1043.
39	INDARTO A, CHOI J W, LEE H, et al. The kinetic studies of direct methane oxidation to methanol in the plasma process[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2008, 53(18): 2783-2792.
40	CHEN L, ZHANG X W, HUANG L, et al. Partial oxidation of methane with air for methanol production in a post-plasma catalytic system[J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 2009, 48(8): 1333-1340.
41	HUANG L, ZHANG X W, CHEN L, et al. Direct oxidation of methane to methanol over Cu-based catalyst in an AC dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 2011, 31(1): 67-77.
42	VAKILI R, GHOLAMI R, STERE C E, et al. Plasma-assisted catalytic dry reforming of methane (DRM) over metal-organic frameworks (MOFs)-based catalysts[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2020, 260: 118195.
43	KHOJA A H, TAHIR M, AMIN N A S. Recent developments in non-thermal catalytic DBD plasma reactor for dry reforming of methane[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 183: 529-560.
44	RAY D, NEPAK D, JANAMPELLI S, et al. Dry reforming of methane in DBD plasma over Ni-based catalysts: influence of process conditions and support on performance and durability[J]. Energy Technology, 2019, 7(4): 1801008.
45	WANG Q, YAN B H, JIN Y, et al. Dry reforming of methane in a dielectric barrier discharge reactor with Ni/Al₂O₃ catalyst: interaction of catalyst and plasma[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2009, 23(8): 4196-4201.
46	MAHAMMADUNNISA S, MANOJ KUMAR REDDY P, RAMARAJU B, et al. Catalytic nonthermal plasma reactor for dry reforming of methane[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27(8): 4441-4447.
47	LEE H, LEE D H, HA J M, et al. Plasma assisted oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) over Ag/SiO₂ and subsequent regeneration at low temperature[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2018, 557: 39-45.
48	KASINATHAN P, PARK S, CHOI W C, et al. Plasma-enhanced methane direct conversion over particle-size adjusted MO_x/Al₂O₃ (M=Ti and Mg) catalysts[J]. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 2014, 34(6): 1317-1330.
49	LIU C J, XUE B Z, ELIASSON B, et al. Methane conversion to higher hydrocarbons in the presence of carbon dioxide using dielectric-barrier discharge plasmas[J]. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 2001, 21(3): 301-310.
50	KIM S S, LEE H, CHOI J W, et al. Methane conversion to higher hydrocarbons in a dielectric-barrier discharge reactor with Pt/γ-Al₂O₃ catalyst[J]. Catalysis Communications, 2007, 8(9): 1438-1442.
51	SEYED MATIN N, SAVADKOOHI H A, FEIZABADI S Y. Methane conversion to C₂ hydrocarbons using dielectric-barrier discharge reactor: effects of system variables[J]. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 2008, 28(2): 189-202.
52	LI X S, ZHU A M, WANG K J, et al. Methane conversion to C2 hydrocarbons and hydrogen in atmospheric non-thermal plasmas generated by different electric discharge techniques[J]. Catalysis Today, 2004, 98(4): 617-624.
53	ELIASSON B, LIU C J, KOGELSCHATZ U. Direct conversion of methane and carbon dioxide to higher hydrocarbons using catalytic dielectric-barrier discharges with zeolites[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2000, 39(5): 1221-1227.
54	PHAM M H, GOUJARD V, TATIBOUËT J M, et al. Activation of methane and carbon dioxide in a dielectric-barrier discharge-plasma reactor to produce hydrocarbons—Influence of La₂O₃/γ-Al₂O₃ catalyst[J]. Catalysis Today, 2011, 171(1): 67-71.
55	WANG L, YI Y, WU C, et al. One-step reforming of CO₂ and CH₄ into high-value liquid chemicals and fuels at room temperature by plasma-driven catalysis[J]. Angewandte Chemie: International Edition, 2017, 56(44): 13679-13683.
56	LI Y, LIU C J, ELIASSON B, et al. Synthesis of oxygenates and higher hydrocarbons directly from methane and carbon dioxide using dielectric-barrier discharges: product distribution[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2002, 16(4): 864-870.
57	CHEN H H, CAO M Y, ZHAO L H, et al. Experimental study of an intensified water-gas shift reaction process using a membrane reactor/adsorptive reactor sequence[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018, 57(41): 13650-13660.
58	XIA S J, FANG L, MENG Y, et al. Water-gas shift reaction catalyzed by layered double hydroxides supported Au-Ni/Cu/Pt bimetallic alloys[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2020, 272: 118949.
59	YAO S Y, ZHANG X, ZHOU W, et al. Atomic-layered Au clusters on α-MoC as catalysts for the low-temperature water-gas shift reaction[J]. Science, 2017, 357(6349): 389-393.
60	RICO V J, HUESO J L, COTRINO J, et al. Hybrid catalytic-DBD plasma reactor for the production of hydrogen and preferential CO oxidation (CO-PROX) at reduced temperatures[J]. Chemical Communications, 2009(41): 6192-6194.
61	TU X, WHITEHEAD J C. Plasma-catalytic dry reforming of methane in an atmospheric dielectric barrier discharge: understanding the synergistic effect at low temperature[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2012, 125: 439-448.
62	LIAN H Y, LI X S, LIU J L, et al. Methanol steam reforming by heat-insulated warm plasma catalysis for efficient hydrogen production[J]. Catalysis Today, 2019, 337: 76-82.
63	LI X S, WANG L Y, GONG X L, et al. Evaluation of plasma-derived heat and synergistic effect for in-plasma catalytic steam reforming of methanol[J]. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2020, 53(10): 104003.
64	NIZIO M, ALBARAZI A, CAVADIAS S, et al. Hybrid plasma-catalytic methanation of CO₂ at low temperature over ceria zirconia supported Ni catalysts[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(27): 11584-11592.
65	NIZIO M, BENRABBAH R, KRZAK M, et al. Low temperature hybrid plasma-catalytic methanation over Ni-Ce-Zr hydrotalcite-derived catalysts[J]. Catalysis Communications, 2016, 83: 14-17.
66	KHOJA A H, TAHIR M, SAIDINA AMIN N A. Process optimization of DBD plasma dry reforming of methane over Ni/La₂O₃MgAl₂O₄ using multiple response surface methodology[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(23): 11774-11787.
67	WANGKAWONG K, PHANICHPHANT S, INCEESUNGVORN B, et al. Kinetics of water gas shift reaction on Au/CeZrO₄: a comparison between conventional heating and dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma activation[J]. Topics in Catalysis, 2020, 63(3/4): 363-369.
68	冯爱虎, 于洋, 于云, 等. 沸石分子筛及其负载型催化剂去除VOCs研究进展[J]. 化学学报, 2018, 76(10): 757-773.
	FENG Aihu, YU Yang, YU Yun, et al. Recent progress in the removal of volatile organic compounds by zeolite and its supported catalysts[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2018, 76(10): 757-773.
69	BACARIZA M C, BISET-PEIRÓ M, GRAÇA I, et al. DBD plasma-assisted CO₂ methanation using zeolite-based catalysts: structure composition-reactivity approach and effect of Ce as promoter[J]. Journal of CO₂ Utilization, 2018, 26: 202-211.
70	CHEN H H, GOODARZI F, MU Y B, et al. Effect of metal dispersion and support structure of Ni/silicalite-1 catalysts on non-thermal plasma (NTP) activated CO₂ hydrogenation[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2020, 272: 119013.
71	JWA E, LEE S B, LEE H W, et al. Plasma-assisted catalytic methanation of CO and CO₂ over Ni-zeolite catalysts[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2013, 108: 89-93.
72	张维中, 温月丽, 宋镕鹏, 等. 金属有机骨架材料应用于二氧化碳加氢催化反应的研究进展[J]. 天然气化工(C₁化学与化工), 2020, 45(1): 113-119, 128.
	ZHANG Weizhong, WEN Yueli, SONG Rongpeng, et al. Research progress of metal-organic framework materials in catalytic reaction of carbon dioxide hydrogenation[J]. Natural Gas Chemical Industry, 2020, 45(1): 113-119, 128.
73	TANAKA Y, UTAKA T, KIKUCHI R, et al. Water gas shift reaction over Cu-based mixed oxides for CO removal from the reformed fuels[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2003, 242(2): 287-295.
74	XU W W, DONG M Y, DI L B, et al. A facile method for preparing UiO-66 encapsulated Ru catalyst and its application in plasma-assisted CO₂ methanation[J]. Nanomaterials, 2019, 9(10): E1432.
75	杨懿. 低温等离子体催化降解甲苯的原位红外研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2013.
	YANG Yi. In situ infrared spectroscopic studies of non-thermal plasma-catalytic degradation of toluene[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2013.
76	竹涛, 万艳东, 李坚, 等. 低温等离子体-催化耦合降解甲苯的研究及机理探讨[J]. 高校化学工程学报, 2011, 25(1): 161-167.
	ZHU Tao, WAN Yandong, LI Jian, et al. Study on decomposition mechanism of toluene by non-thermal plasma coupled with catalysis[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 2011, 25(1): 161-167.
77	孙杨, 丁豆豆, 林昌, 等. 动态现场原位(operando)表征技术在多相催化反应中的应用与进展[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(1): 260-277.
	SUN Yang, DING Doudou, LIN Chang, et al. Advances in operando techniques for the heterogeneous catalytic reactions[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(1): 260-277.
78	徐锋, 朱丽华, 李创. 低温等离子体活化转化煤层甲烷机理的光谱诊断[J]. 发光学报, 2017, 38(3): 372-379.
	XU Feng, ZHU Lihua, LI Chuang. Mechanism of activation and conversion of coalbed methane under cold plasma by optical emission spectroscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of Luminescence, 2017, 38(3): 372-379.
79	张家良. 低温等离子体发射光谱学研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2002.
	ZHANG Jialiang. Emission spectroscopy methodology for low temperature discharge plasma of low pressure gas[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2002.
80	罗利霞, 吴卫东, 孙卫国, 等. 低压甲烷等离子体发射光谱诊断[J]. 真空科学与技术学报, 2007, 27(3): 203-207.
	LUO Lixia, WU Weidong, SUN Weiguo, et al. Diagnosis of low-pressure methane plasma by optical emission spectroscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, 2007, 27(3): 203-207.
81	AHMAD F, LOVELL E C, MASOOD H, et al. Low-temperature CO₂ methanation: synergistic effects in plasma-Ni hybrid catalytic system[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2020, 8(4): 1888-1898.
82	XU S S, CHANSAI S, SHAO Y, et al. Mechanistic study of non-thermal plasma assisted CO₂ hydrogenation over Ru supported on MgAl layered double hydroxide[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2020, 268: 118752.
83	STERE C, CHANSAI S, GHOLAMI R, et al. A design of a fixed bed plasma DRIFTS cell for studying the NTP-assisted heterogeneously catalysed reactions[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2020, 10(5): 1458-1466.
84	MU Y B, XU S J, SHAO Y, et al. Kinetic study of nonthermal plasma activated catalytic CO₂ hydrogenation over Ni supported on silica catalyst[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2020, 59(20): 9478-9487.
85	SHENG Z R, WATANABE Y, KIM H H, et al. Plasma-enabled mode-selective activation of CH₄ for dry reforming: first touch on the kinetic analysis[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 399: 125751.

[1]	张明焱, 刘燕, 张雪婷, 刘亚科, 李从举, 张秀玲. 非贵金属双功能催化剂在锌空气电池研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 276-286.
[2]	时永兴, 林刚, 孙晓航, 蒋韦庚, 乔大伟, 颜彬航. 二氧化碳加氢制甲醇过程中铜基催化剂活性位点研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 287-298.
[3]	谢璐垚, 陈崧哲, 王来军, 张平. 用于SO₂去极化电解制氢的铂基催化剂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 299-309.
[4]	杨霞珍, 彭伊凡, 刘化章, 霍超. 熔铁催化剂活性相的调控及其费托反应性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 310-318.
[5]	王乐乐, 杨万荣, 姚燕, 刘涛, 何川, 刘逍, 苏胜, 孔凡海, 朱仓海, 向军. SCR脱硝催化剂掺废特性及性能影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 489-497.
[6]	邓丽萍, 时好雨, 刘霄龙, 陈瑶姬, 严晶颖. 非贵金属改性钒钛基催化剂NH₃-SCR脱硝协同控制VOCs[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 542-548.
[7]	程涛, 崔瑞利, 宋俊男, 张天琪, 张耘赫, 梁世杰, 朴实. 渣油加氢装置杂质沉积规律与压降升高机理分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4616-4627.
[8]	王鹏, 史会兵, 赵德明, 冯保林, 陈倩, 杨妲. 过渡金属催化氯代物的羰基化反应研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4649-4666.
[9]	张启, 赵红, 荣峻峰. 质子交换膜燃料电池中氧还原反应抗毒性电催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4677-4691.
[10]	王伟涛, 鲍婷玉, 姜旭禄, 何珍红, 王宽, 杨阳, 刘昭铁. 醛酮树脂基非金属催化剂催化氧气氧化苯制备苯酚[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4706-4715.
[11]	葛亚粉, 孙宇, 肖鹏, 刘琦, 刘波, 孙成蓥, 巩雁军. 分子筛去除VOCs的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4716-4730.
[12]	吴海波, 王希仑, 方岩雄, 纪红兵. 3D打印催化材料开发与应用进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3956-3964.
[13]	向阳, 黄寻, 魏子栋. 电催化有机合成反应的活性和选择性调控研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4005-4014.
[14]	王耀刚, 韩子姗, 高嘉辰, 王新宇, 李思琪, 杨全红, 翁哲. 铜基催化剂电还原二氧化碳选择性的调控策略[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4043-4057.
[15]	刘毅, 房强, 钟达忠, 赵强, 李晋平. Ag/Cu耦合催化剂的Cu晶面调控用于电催化二氧化碳还原[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4136-4142.

非热等离子体催化转化C₁分子及其催化剂研究进展

Review on non-thermal plasma (NTP) catalytic conversion of C₁ molecules and its catalysts

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 85

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价