Aspen HYSYS对胺法脱碳再生工艺模拟的适用性

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-0648

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为分析Aspen HYSYS软件模拟的可靠度，进一步确定HYSYS软件在胺法脱碳再生工艺中的适用性，基于自主设计搭建的胺法脱碳中试试验装置，建立相应的HYSYS软件稳态仿真模型，对不同原料气气质、胺液流量、胺液配方、再生压力、再生温度下的胺液解吸率及再生能耗进行模拟、误差计算，分析HYSYS软件在胺法脱碳再生工艺中的适用性。研究结果表明，利用HYSYS软件模拟胺法脱碳过程中的再生工艺时，模拟结果随工艺参数的变化规律与试验结果总体保持一致，除个别不利于再生的工艺参数外，HYSYS软件的模拟适用性均较好；HYSYS软件中影响再生效果的5个工艺参数对模拟适用性影响较大的是再生压力，MDEA+MEA和TEA+MEA两种不同配方影响较小。另外，对再生能耗模拟误差影响较大的是再生温度，在一定塔底压力下，再生温度存在一个转折点，高于该温度时，再生能耗大幅度增加。本次验证过程中，再生温度115℃左右为一个转折点，但HYSYS软件的总体模拟能耗适应性均较差。

关键词: 天然气脱碳, HYSYS, 再生工艺, 解吸率, 再生能耗

Abstract:

In order to analyze the reliability of Aspen HYSYS software simulation and further determine the applicability of HYSYS software in the amine decarbonization regeneration process, based on the independently designed amine decarbonization experimental device, the corresponding HYSYS software steady-state simulation model is established. Simulation and error calculation are carried out on the amine desorption rate and regeneration energy consumption under different acid gas content, amine liquid flow, amine liquid formula, regeneration pressure and regeneration temperature, and the applicability of HYSYS software in amine decarbonization regeneration process is analyzed. The research results show that using the HYSYS software to simulate the regeneration process in the amine decarbonization process, the variation of the simulation results with the process parameters is generally consistent with the test results. Except for some process parameters that are not conducive to regeneration, the simulation applicability of the HYSYS software is good. Among the five process parameters in HYSYS software that affect the regeneration effect, the regeneration pressure has a greatest impact on the simulation applicability, while the two different formulations of MDEA+MEA and TEA+MEA have the least effect In addition, the regeneration temperature has a great influence on the simulation error of the regeneration energy consumption. At a certain bottom pressure, the regeneration temperature has a turning point. Above this temperature, the regeneration energy consumption increases significantly. During the verification process, the regeneration temperature is around 115℃, which is a turning point, but the overall simulation energy consumption adaptability of HYSYS software is poor.

Key words: natural gas decarbonization, HYSYS, regeneration process, desorption, renewable energy consumption

中图分类号:

TE644

唐建峰, 王玉娟, 王曰, 花亦怀, 褚洁, 桑伟, 陈静. Aspen HYSYS对胺法脱碳再生工艺模拟的适用性[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(2): 747-754.

Jianfeng TANG, Yujuan WANG, Yue WANG, Yihuai HUA, Jie CHU, Wei SANG, Jing CHEN. Applicability of Aspen HYSYS for simulation of amine decarbonization regeneration process[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(2): 747-754.

图/表 16

参考文献 17

1	ZHANG Kai, LIU Yang. Simulation calculation of natural gas liquefaction processes[J]. Liaoning Chemical Industry, 2017, 46(3): 234-236.
2	张旭. 天然气净化系统工艺过程与装置配气优化研究[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2018.
	ZHANG Xu. Study on the optimization of technologyprocess and gas distribution in natural gaspurification system[D]. Xi’an: Northwest University, 2018.
3	周丹, 陈杰, 花亦怀, 等. 三乙醇胺与烯胺混合胺液脱碳性能及配比优选实验研究[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(1): 95-101.
	ZHOU Dan, CHEN Jie, HUA Yihuai, et al. Experimental study on performance and proportion optimization of TEA+enamine mixed solution for natural gas decarburization[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2015, 34(1): 95-101.
4	田文爽, 孟硕, 张海滨, 等. MDEA脱碳装置模拟与优化[J]. 天然气与石油, 2018, 36(1): 48-54.
	TIAN Wenshuang, MENG Shuo, ZHANG Haibin, et al. Optimization of CO₂ removal process using MDEA amine[J]. Natural Gas and Oil, 2018, 36(1): 48-54.
5	孟锐. HYSYS流程模拟在溶剂再生脱硫装置的应用[J]. 炼油技术与工程, 2017, 47(12): 18-23.
	MENG Rui. Application of HYSYS process simulation in desulfurization unit for solvent regeneration[J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2017, 47(12): 18-23.
6	邵青楠, 顾鑫诚, 邓春, 等. 天然气处理工艺建模与模拟进展[J]. 石油科学通报, 2019, 4(2): 192-203.
	SHAO Qingnan, GU Xincheng, DENG Chun, et al. Research advances in the simulation and modeling of natural gas treatment process[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2019, 4(2): 192-203.
7	陈颖, 孔祥森, 王建. Aspen Plus基于不同吸收体系对高含CO₂天然气净化流程模拟[J]. 能源化工, 2016, 37(5): 66-70.
	CHEN Ying, KONG Xiangsen, WANG Jian. Aspen Plus process simulation based on different absorption system of purification of natural gas with CO₂ content[J]. Energy Chemical Industry, 2016, 37(5): 66-70.
8	陈赓良. 醇胺法脱硫脱碳工艺的回顾与展望[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2003, 32(3): 134-138.
	CHEN Gengliang. Review and prospect for the desulfurization and decarbonization by oxyamine process[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2003, 32(3): 134-138.
1	张凯, 刘洋. 三种天然气液化流程模拟分析[J]. 辽宁化工, 2017, 46(3): 234-236.
9	李洪涛, 何英华, 朱丽娜, 等. 常用化工流程模拟软件发展概述[J]. 化工技术与开发, 2015, 44(1): 29-31, 48.
	LI Hongtao, HE Yinghua, ZHU Lina, et al. Development overview on common chemical process simulation software[J]. Technology & Development of Chemical Industry, 2015, 44(1): 29-31, 48.
10	徐桥桥. 催化裂化装置HYSYS流程模拟[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2017.
	XU Qiaoqiao. HYSYS process simulation of catalytic cracking unit[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2017.
11	王飞, 付峻, 苗建. HYSYS软件在某海上气田三甘醇脱水工艺中的应用[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2019, 48(4): 20-26.
	WANG Fei, FU Jun, MIAO Jian. Application of TEG dehydration process by HYSYS software in an offshore gas field[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2019, 48(4): 20-26.
12	宋涛. 天然气管网特征线法动态仿真分析[D]. 西安: 西安石油大学, 2015.
	SONG Tao. Dynamic simulation analysis of natural gas pipeline network in method ofcharacteristics[D]. Xi’an: Xi’an ShiyouUniversity, 2015.
13	陈杰, 唐建峰, 金新明, 等. 醇胺法脱碳工艺参数中试实验与模拟优化[J]. 石油学报(石油加工), 2017, 33(5): 966-974.
	CHEN Jie, TANG Jianfeng, JIN Xinming, et al. The pilot scale experiment and optimization simulation of decarbonization process parameters by alcohol amine[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica(Petroleum Processing Section), 2017, 33(5): 966-974.
14	刘家洪, 周平.浅析HYSYS软件在三甘醇脱水工艺设计中的应用[J]. 天然气与石油, 2000(1): 18-20.
	LIU Jiahong, ZHOU Ping. Elementary analysis of application of HYSYS software in TEG dehydration processing design[J]. Natural Gas and Oil, 2000(1): 18-20.
15	孙姣, 孙兵, 姬春彦, 等.天然气脱硫过程的胺液污染问题及胺液净化技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2014, 33(10): 2771-2777.
	SUN Jiao, SUN Bing, JI Chunyan, et al. Introduction of amine liquid pollution in natural gas desulfurizationprocess and purification technology[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2014, 33(10): 2771-2777.
16	陈宏福, 王翀, 闫广宏, 等. MDEA脱碳工艺的模拟分析[J]. 山东化工, 2016, 45(2): 87-89.
	CHEN Hongfu, WANG Chong, YAN Guanghong, et al. Simulated calculation on the MDEA decarbonization system of natural gas[J]. Shandong Chemical Industry, 2016, 45(2): 87-89.
17	唐建峰, 陈杰, 花亦怀, 等. 大型天然气净化工艺模拟实验装置的研制[J]. 实验室研究与探索, 2015, 34(1): 63-66, 117.
	TANG Jianfeng, CHEN Jie, HUA Yihua, et al. Development of the mass imitative experimental device of natural gas purification process[J]. Research and Exploration in Laboratory, 2015, 34(1): 63-66, 117.

设备名称	选用软件模块	模块对应名称	模块明细
吸收塔	Absorber Column	吸收塔	填料塔、填料类型为θ环填料
再生塔	Distillation Column	再生塔	填料塔、填料类型为θ环填料
闪蒸罐	Separator	闪蒸罐	—
换热器	Heat Exchanger	贫富液换热器	—
冷却器	Cooler	贫液冷却器	—
贫液泵	Pump	胺液循环泵	—
循环装置	Recycle	RCY-1	—

设备名称	选用软件模块	模块对应名称	模块明细
吸收塔	Absorber Column	吸收塔	填料塔、填料类型为θ环填料
再生塔	Distillation Column	再生塔	填料塔、填料类型为θ环填料
闪蒸罐	Separator	闪蒸罐	—
换热器	Heat Exchanger	贫富液换热器	—
冷却器	Cooler	贫液冷却器	—
贫液泵	Pump	胺液循环泵	—
循环装置	Recycle	RCY-1	—

酸气物质的量分数 /%	胺液解吸率/ %
酸气物质的量分数 /%	Er_ave	Er_max	标准差
6	15.50	21.35	11.06
4	20.73	39.08	22.31
3	36.34	162.70	58.71

酸气物质的量分数 /%	胺液解吸率/ %
酸气物质的量分数 /%	Er_ave	Er_max	标准差
6	15.50	21.35	11.06
4	20.73	39.08	22.31
3	36.34	162.70	58.71

胺液流量/m³·h^-1	胺液解吸率/ %
胺液流量/m³·h^-1	Er_ave	Er_max	标准差
0.15	12.90	23.32	17.35
0.20	15.78	20.87	17.99
0.25	47.17	162.71	64.68