压力驱动薄层复合膜中微孔基底的研究进展

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-0143

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

压力驱动薄层复合膜（TFC）因其高分离效率和低能耗等优点，在水处理领域得到广泛应用。TFC膜的开发及性能提升可针对聚酰胺（PA）分离层和微孔基底两方面进行优化。其中，微孔基底对其上通过界面聚合（IP）形成的PA层的结构和分离性能具有重要影响。本文对NF/RO TFC膜中微孔基底的研究工作进行了评述。首先对两类微孔基底（相转化微孔基底和静电纺丝微孔基底）进行了概述，进而介绍了传统相转化微孔基底对IP过程的影响机理，并对相转化微孔基底的改性方法（聚合物共混、纳米材料掺杂、表面改性等）进行了总结，最后展望了共价有机框架（COFs）中间层表面改性微孔基底在构建高选择性、高渗透通量压力驱动TFC膜中的发展方向及面临的挑战。

关键词: 膜, 分离, 表面, 微孔基底, 渗透

Abstract:

The pressure-driven thin film composite (TFC) membranes have been widely applied in the field of water treatment due to their high separation efficiency and low-energy consumption.The development and performance improvement of TFC membranes can be optimized for polyamide (PA) separation layer and microporous substrate. Among them, microporous substrate has an important influence on the structure and separation performance of PA layer formed by interface polymerization (IP). In this paper, the recent progress in the substrates of NF/RO TFC membranes is reviewed. Firstly,two kinds of microporous substrates (conventional phase transformed microporous substrate and electrospinned microporous substrate) are introduced. Then, the effects of the phase-inversion substrates on the IP process are summarized. The substrates modification methods (polymer blending, nanomaterial doping, surface modification, etc.) are reviewed. Finally, development directions and challenges in covalent organic frameworks (COFs) interlayer surface modified microporous substrates for high-performance pressure-driven TFC membranes are tentatively discussed.

Key words: membrane, separation, surface, microporous substrates, permeation

中图分类号:

任亮, 陈建新, 卢卿, 韩健, 吴洪. 压力驱动薄层复合膜中微孔基底的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(6): 2156-2165.

Liang REN, Jianxin CHEN, Qing LU, Jian HAN, Hong WU. Recent progress on microporous substrate for pressure-driven thin film composite membranes[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(6): 2156-2165.

参考文献

1	OKI T, KANAE S. Global hydrological cycles and world water resources[J]. Science, 2006, 313: 1068-1072.
2	ZHANG Yizhou, ALMODOVAR-ARBELO N E, WEIDMAN J L, et al. Fit-for-purpose block polymer membranes molecularly engineered for water treatment[J]. NPJ Clean Water, 2018, 1: 2.
3	WERBER J R, OSUJI C O, ELIMELECH M. Materials for next-generation desalination and water purification membranes[J]. Nature Reviews Materials, 2016, 1: 16018.
4	YANG Zhe, GUO Hao, TANG C Y. The upper bound of thin-film composite (TFC) polyamide membranes for desalination[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 590: 117297.
5	PETERSEN R J. Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 1993, 83(1): 81-150.
6	WANG Chongbin, LI Zhiyuan, CHEN Jianxin, et al. Covalent organic framework modified polyamide nanofiltration membrane with enhanced performance for desalination[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 523: 273-281.
7	WANG Chongbin, LI Zhiyuan, CHEN Jianxin, et al. Influence of blending zwitterionic functionalized titanium nanotubes on flux and anti-fouling performance of polyamide nanofiltration membranes[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2018, 53(14): 10499-10512.
8	REN Liang, CHEN Jianxin, WANG Chongbin, et al. Triptycene based polyamide thin film composite membrane for high nanofiltration performance[J]. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2019, 101: 119-126.
9	KARAN S, JIANG Zhiwei, LIVINGSTON A G. Sub-10nm polyamide nanofilms with ultrafast solvent transport for molecular separation[J]. Science, 2015, 348(6241): 1347-1351.
10	YUAN Jinqiu, WU Mengyuan, WU Hong, et al. Covalent organic framework-modulated interfacial polymerization for ultrathin desalination membranes[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2019, 7(44): 25641-25649.
11	ZHANG Xi, Lü Yan, YANG Haocheng, et al. Polyphenol coating as an interlayer for thin-film composite membranes with enhanced nanofiltration performance[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8(47): 32512-32519.
12	Woei-Jye LAU, LAI Gwo-Sung, LI Jianxin, et al. Development of microporous substrates of polyamide thin film composite membranes for pressure-driven and osmotically-driven membrane processes: a review[J]. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2019, 77: 25-59.
13	XU Guorong, XU Jianmei, FENG Houjun, et al. Tailoring structures and performance of polyamide thin film composite (PA-TFC) desalination membranes via sublayers adjustment—a review[J]. Desalination, 2017, 417(19): 19-35.
14	GUILLEN G R, PAN Yinjin, LI Minghua, et al. Preparation and characterization of membranes formed by nonsolvent induced phase separation: a review[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2011, 50(7): 3798-3817.
15	GUILLOTIN M, LEMOYNE C, NOEL C, et al. Physicochemical processes occurring during the formation of cellulose diacetate membranes. Research of criteria for optimizing membrane performance. Ⅳ. Cellulose diacetate-acetone-organic additive casting solutions[J]. Desalination, 1977, 21(2): 165-181.
16	KOENHEN D M, MULDER M H V, SMOLDERS C A. Phase separation phenomena during the formation of asymmetric membranes[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1977, 21(1): 199-215.
17	LI Dan, XIA Younan. Electrospinning of nanofibers: reinventing the wheel?[J]. Advanced Materials, 2004, 16(14): 1151-1170.
18	RENEKER D H, CHUN I. Nanometre diameter fibres of polymer, produced by electrospinning[J]. Nanotechnology, 1996, 7(3): 216-223.
19	BAHRAMI G, EHZARI H, MIRZABEIGY S, et al. Fabrication of a sensitive electrochemical sensor based on electrospun magnetic nanofibers for morphine analysis in biological samples[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2020, 106: 110183.
20	KHOSHNEVISAN K, MALEKI H, SAMADIAN H, et al. Cellulose acetate electrospun nanofibers for drug delivery systems: applications and recent advances[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2018, 198: 131-141.
21	WU Tingting, DING Mengzhen, SHI Cuiping, et al. Resorbable polymer electrospun nanofibers: history, shapes and application for tissue engineering[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2020, 31(3): 617-625.
22	SUBRAMANIAN S, SEERAM R. New directions in nanofiltration applications—Are nanofibers the right materials as membranes in desalination?[J]. Desalination, 2013, 308: 198-208.
23	YOON K, HSIAO B S, CHU B. High flux nanofiltration membranes based on interfacially polymerized polyamide barrier layer on polyacrylonitrile nanofibrous scaffolds[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2009, 326(2): 484-492.
24	YOON K, HSIAO B S, CHU B. Formation of functional polyethersulfone electrospun membrane for water purification by mixed solvent and oxidation processes[J]. Polymer, 2009, 50(13): 2893-2899.
25	CADOTTE J E, PETERSEN R J, LARSON R E, et al. A new thin-film composite seawater reverse osmosis membrane[J]. Desalination, 1980, 32: 25-31.
26	BRUGGEN B VAN DER, M?NTT?RI M, NYSTR?M M. Drawbacks of applying nanofiltration and how to avoid them: a review[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2008, 63(2): 251-263.
27	SONG Yujun, SUN P, HENRY L L, et al. Mechanisms of structure and performance controlled thin film composite membrane formation via interfacial polymerization process[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2005, 251(1): 67-79.
28	FAN Xiaochen, DONG Yanan, SU Yanlei, et al. Improved performance of composite nanofiltration membranes by adding calcium chloride in aqueous phase during interfacial polymerization process[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 452: 90-96.
29	SINGH P S, JOSHI S V, TRIVEDI J J, et al. Probing the structural variations of thin film composite RO membranes obtained by coating polyamide over polysulfone membranes of different pore dimensions[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 278(1/2): 19-25.
30	MISDAN N, LAU W J, ISMAIL A F, et al. Formation of thin film composite nanofiltration membrane: effect of polysulfone substrate characteristics[J]. Desalination, 2013, 329: 9-18.
31	LAU W J, ISMAIL A F, MISDAN N, et al. A recent progress in thin film composite membrane: a review[J]. Desalination, 2012, 287: 190-199.
32	SHARABATI J A D, GUCLU S, ERKOC-ILTER S, et al. Interfacially polymerized thin-film composite membranes: impact of support layer pore size on active layer polymerization and seawater desalination performance[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 212: 438-448.
33	YAN Hao, MIAO Xiaopei, XU Jian, et al. The porous structure of the fully-aromatic polyamide film in reverse osmosis membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 475: 504-510.
34	ALSVIK I L, H?GG M B. Preparation of thin film composite membranes with polyamide film on hydrophilic supports[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 428: 225-231.
35	ZHANG Qifeng, ZHANG Zhiguang, DAI Lei, et al. Novel insights into the interplay between support and active layer in the thin film composite polyamide membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 537: 372-383.
36	CHAO Wei-Chi, HUANG Yun-Hsuan, HUNG Wei-Song, et al. Effect of the surface property of poly(tetrafluoroethylene) support on the mechanism of polyamide active layer formation by interfacial polymerization[J]. Soft Matter, 2012, 8(34): 8998-9004.
37	GHOSH A K, HOEK E M V. Impacts of support membrane structure and chemistry on polyamide-polysulfone interfacial composite membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2009, 336(1): 140-148.
38	KIM J, LEE K. Effect of PEG additive on membrane formation by phase inversion[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 1998, 138(2): 153-163.
39	HAN M, NAM S. Thermodynamic and rheological variation in polysulfone solution by PVP and its effect in the preparation of phase inversion membrane[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2002, 202(1): 55-61.
40	AHMAD A L, ABDULKARIM A A, OOI B S, et al. Recent development in additives modifications of polyethersulfone membrane for flux enhancement[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 223: 246-267.
41	FENG Chunsheng, WANG Rong, SHI Baoli, et al. Factors affecting pore structure and performance of poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoro propylene) asymmetric porous membrane[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 277(1-2): 55-64.
42	MATSUDA M, SATO M, SAKATA H, et al. Effects of fluid flow on elution of hydrophilic modifier from dialysis membrane surfaces[J]. Journal of Artificial Organs, 2008, 11(3): 148-155.
43	QIN Hui, NIE Shengqiang, CHENG Chong, et al. Insights into the surface property and blood compatibility of polyethersulfone/polyvinylpyrrolidone composite membranes: toward high-performance hemodialyzer[J]. Polymers for Advanced Technologies, 2014, 25(8): 851-860.
44	ZHU Lijing, SONG Haiming, WANG Gang, et al. Microstructures and performances of pegylated polysulfone membranes from an in situ synthesized solution via vapor induced phase separation approach[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2018, 515: 152-159.
45	CHEN Xiangrong, TANG Bingxue, LUO Jianquan, et al. Towards high-performance polysulfone membrane: the role of PSF-b-PEG copolymer additive[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2017, 241: 355-365.
46	PARK J Y, ACAR M H, AKTHAKUL A, et al. Polysulfone-graft-poly(ethylene glycol) graft copolymers for surface modification of polysulfone membranes[J]. Biomaterials, 2006, 27(6): 856-865.
47	HE Meibo, LI Tong, HU Minli, et al. Performance improvement for thin-film composite nanofiltration membranes prepared on PSf/PSf-g-PEG blended substrates[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 230: 115855.
48	SAMSUDIN S A, KUKUREKA S N, JENKINS M J. Miscibility in cyclic poly(butylene terephthalate) and styrene maleimide blends prepared by solid-dispersion and in situ polymerization of cyclic butylene terephthalate oligomers within styrene maleimide[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2012, 126: 290-297.
49	LI Hongbin, SHI Wenying, ZHANG Yufeng, et al. Preparation of hydrophilic PVDF/PPTA blend membranes by in situ polycondensation and its application in the treatment of landfill leachate[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2015, 346: 134-146.
50	SHI Qiang, NI Lei, ZHANG Yufeng, et al. Poly(p-phenylene terephthamide) embedded in a polysulfone as the substrate for improving compaction resistance and adhesion of a thin film composite polyamide membrane[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2017, 5(26): 13610-13624.
51	ZHU Guanghui, ZHANG Fengyi, RIVERA M P, et al. Molecularly mixed composite membranes for advanced separation processes[J]. Angewandte Chemie: International Edition, 2019, 58(9): 2638-2643.
52	ZHAI Zhe, ZHAO Na, LIU Jiahui, et al. Advanced nanofiltration membrane fabricated on the porous organic cage tailored support for water purification application[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 230: 115845.
53	YIN Jun, DENG Baolin. Polymer-matrix nanocomposite membranes for water treatment[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 479: 256-275.
54	ZHANG Zhenghua, AN Quanfu, LIU Tao, et al. Fabrication and characterization of novel SiO₂-PAMPS/PSF hybrid ultrafiltration membrane with high water flux[J]. Desalination, 2012, 297: 59-71.
55	YANG Yanan, ZHANG Huixuan, WANG Peng, et al. The influence of nano-sized TiO₂ fillers on the morphologies and properties of PSF UF membrane[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2007, 288(1): 231-238.
56	CHAE H, LEE C, PARK P, et al. Synergetic effect of graphene oxide nanosheets embedded in the active and support layers on the performance of thin-film composite membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 525: 99-106.
57	XIE Quanling, ZHANG Shishen, HONG Zhuan, et al. A novel double-modified strategy to enhance the performance of thin-film nanocomposite nanofiltration membranes: incorporating functionalized graphenes into supporting and selective layers[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 368: 186-201.
58	YAN Wentao, WANG Zhi, WU Junhui, et al. Enhancing the flux of brackish water TFC RO membrane by improving support surface porosity via a secondary pore-forming method[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 498: 227-241.
59	LEE T H, LEE M Y, LEE H D, et al. Highly porous carbon nanotube/polysulfone nanocomposite supports for high-flux polyamide reverse osmosis membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 539: 441-450.
60	GUMBI N N, LI Jianxin, MAMBA B B, et al. Relating the performance of sulfonated thin-film composite nanofiltration membranes to structural properties of macrovoid-free polyethersulfone/sulfonated polysulfone/O-MWCNT supports[J]. Desalination, 2020, 474: 114176.
61	PARK H M, JEE K Y, LEE Y T. Preparation and characterization of a thin-film composite reverse osmosis membrane using a polysulfone membrane including metal-organic frameworks[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 541: 510-518.
62	DUONG P H H, KUEHL V A, MASTOROVICH B, et al. Carboxyl-functionalized covalent organic framework as a two-dimensional nanofiller for mixed-matrix ultrafiltration membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 574: 338-348.
63	OH N W, JEGAL J, LEE K H. Preparation and characterization of nanofiltration composite membranes using polyacrylonitrile (PAN). I. Preparation and characterization of polyamide composite membranes[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2001, 80(14): 2729-2736.
64	PéREZ-MANRíQUEZ L, ABURABI’E J, NEELAKANDA P, et al. Cross-linked PAN-based thin-film composite membranes for non-aqueous nanofiltration[J]. Reactive and Functional Polymers, 2015, 86: 243-247.
65	KIM H, KIM S S. Plasma treatment of polypropylene and polysulfone supports for thin film composite reverse osmosis membrane[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 286(1/2): 193-201.
66	KIM H, KIM S S. Fabrication of reverse osmosis membrane via low temperature plasma polymerization[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2001, 190(1): 21-33.
67	KIM E, KIM Y J, YU Q S, et al. Preparation and characterization of polyamide thin-film composite (TFC) membranes on plasma-modified polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2009, 344(1): 71-81.
68	PARK S, KWON S J, SHIN M G, et al. Polyethylene-supported high performance reverse osmosis membranes with enhanced mechanical and chemical durability[J]. Desalination, 2018, 436: 28-38.
69	RAHIM M A, KRISTUFEK S L, PAN S, et al. Phenolic building blocks for the assembly of functional materials[J]. Angewandte Chemie: International Edition, 2019, 58(7): 1904-1927.
70	ZHU Junyong, YUAN Shushan, ULIANA A, et al. High-flux thin film composite membranes for nanofiltration mediated by a rapid co-deposition of polydopamine/piperazine[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 554: 97-108.
71	WU Xiaoli, LI Yifan, CUI Xulin, et al. Adsorption-assisted interfacial polymerization toward ultrathin active layers for ultrafast organic permeation[J]. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, 2018, 10(12): 10445-10453.
72	SHI Mengqi, WANG Zhi, ZHAO Song, et al. A novel pathway for high performance RO membrane: preparing active layer with decreased thickness and enhanced compactness by incorporating tannic acid into the support[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 555: 157-168.
73	YANG Zhe, ZHOU Zhiwen, GUO Hao, et al. Tannic acid/Fe³⁺ nanoscaffold for interfacial polymerization: toward enhanced nanofiltration performance[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2018, 52(16): 9341-9349.
74	ZHAI Zhe, JIANG Chi, ZHAO Na, et al. Fabrication of advanced nanofiltration membranes with nanostrand hybrid morphology mediated by ultrafast Noria-polyethyleneimine codeposition[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2018, 6(42): 21207-21215.
75	ZHU Yuzhang, XIE Wei, GAO Shoujian, et al. Single-walled carbon nanotube film supported nanofiltration membrane with a nearly 10nm thick polyamide selective layer for high-flux and high-rejection desalination[J]. Small, 2016, 12(36): 5034-5041.
76	WANG Jingjing, YANG Haocheng, WU Mingbang, et al. Nanofiltration membranes with cellulose nanocrystals as an interlayer for unprecedented performance[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2017, 5(31): 16289-16295.
77	WU Mengyuan, MA Tianyi, SU Yanlei, et al. Fabrication of composite nanofiltration membrane by incorporating attapulgite nanorods during interfacial polymerization for high water flux and antifouling property[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 544: 79-87.
78	CHANDRA S, KUNDU T, KANDAMBETH S, et al. Phosphoric acid loaded azo (NN) based covalent organic framework for proton conduction[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2014, 136(18): 6570-6573.
79	DOGRU M, HANDLOSER M, AURAS F, et al. A photoconductive thienothiophene-based covalent organic framework showing charge transfer towards included fullerene[J]. Angewandte Chemie: International Edition, 2013, 52(10): 2920-2924.
80	ZHANG Zhe, SHI Xiansong, WANG Rui, et al. Ultra-permeable polyamide membranes harvested by covalent organic framework nanofiber scaffolds: a two-in-one strategy[J]. Chemical Science, 2019, 10: 9077-9083.

[1]	贺美晋. 分子管理在炼油领域分离技术中的应用和发展趋势[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 260-266.
[2]	张祚群, 高扬, 白超杰, 薛立新. 二次界面聚合同步反扩散原位生长ZIF-8纳米粒子制备聚酰胺混合基质反渗透（RO）膜[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 364-373.
[3]	张杰, 白忠波, 冯宝鑫, 彭肖林, 任伟伟, 张菁丽, 刘二勇. PEG及其复合添加剂对电解铜箔后处理的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 374-381.
[4]	崔守成, 徐洪波, 彭楠. 两种MOFs材料用于O₂/He吸附分离的模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 382-390.
[5]	李世霖, 胡景泽, 王毅霖, 王庆吉, 邵磊. 电渗析分离提取高值组分的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 420-429.
[6]	赵景超, 谭明. 表面活性剂对电渗析减量化工业含盐废水的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 529-535.
[7]	郭强, 赵文凯, 肖永厚. 增强流体扰动强化变压吸附甲硫醚/氮气分离的数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 64-72.
[8]	廖志新, 罗涛, 王红, 孔佳骏, 申海平, 管翠诗, 王翠红, 佘玉成. 溶剂脱沥青技术应用与进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4573-4586.
[9]	王谨航, 何勇, 史伶俐, 龙臻, 梁德青. 气体水合物阻聚剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4587-4602.
[10]	李雪佳, 李鹏, 李志霞, 晋墩尚, 郭强, 宋旭锋, 宋芃, 彭跃莲. 亲水和疏水改性膜的抗结垢和润湿能力的对比[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4458-4464.
[11]	徐杰, 夏隆博, 罗平, 邹栋, 仲兆祥. 面向膜蒸馏过程的全疏膜制备及其应用进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3943-3955.
[12]	王报英, 王皝莹, 闫军营, 汪耀明, 徐铜文. 聚合物包覆膜在金属分离回收中的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3990-4004.
[13]	张超, 杨鹏, 刘广林, 赵伟, 杨绪飞, 张伟, 宇波. 表面微结构对阵列微射流沸腾换热的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4193-4203.
[14]	张振, 李丹, 陈辰, 吴菁岚, 应汉杰, 乔浩. 吸附树脂对唾液酸的分离纯化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4153-4158.
[15]	潘宜昌, 周荣飞, 邢卫红. 高效分离同碳数烃的先进微孔膜：现状与挑战[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3926-3942.