不同时期排泥对培养SBBR生物膜的影响

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2018-0921

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

序批式生物膜反应器（sequencing biofilm batch reactor, SBBR）是应用广泛的污水处理方法。为探究不同时期排泥对SBBR污染物去除效果与微生物群落结构的影响，本研究设置了挂膜初期、中期和后期进行排泥的反应器处理生活污水，同时结合16S rDNA高通量测序技术对微生物群落结构进行分析，并采用机器学习（machine learning, ML）的方法，在传统的微生物优势种分析基础上，对测序数据进行深度挖掘，寻找造成组间差异的关键物种。水质测定结果显示，COD去除效果在不同时期排泥的SBBR间没有明显差异，出水COD均低于30mg/L。挂膜中期排泥的SBBR的NH₃-N去除率先达到稳定且高于前期和后期排泥的系统。高通量测序结果显示，各SBBR中微生物优势种均以降解有机物的物种为主。挂膜中期排泥的SBBR中，ML筛选得到的NH₃-N去除相关物种（Hydrogenophaga、Gemmata和Nitrospira）与差异关键物种丰度更高，微生物群落结构稳定性更强，可从微生物层面解释分析SBBR污染物去除效果的差异。

关键词: 废水, 生物膜, 高通量测序, 微生物群落结构, 机器学习

Abstract:

Sequencing biofilm batch reactor (SBBR) is applied to sewage treatment. In order to investigate the effects of different sludge drainage stages on the pollutant removal and microbial community structure, three reactors were installed to treat domestic sewage. Activated sludge was removed in reactors at the initial, middle, and late culturing stages, respectively. Meanwhile, the microbial community structure and traditional microbial dominant species were analyzed by 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing technology. Moreover, machine learning （ML） also played a role in excavating the sequencing data in depth and finding key species which led to the differences among groups. The water quality analysis results showed that there was no significant difference in COD removal efficiency among reactors with different sludge drainage stages, and the COD of effluent was all lower than 30mg/L. The NH₃-N removal efficiency of SBBR in sludge discharge in the middle stage was the first to reach a stable level and higher than that in the early and late stage of sludge discharge system. The results of high-throughput sequencing showed that the dominant microbial species in SBBR were mainly those that with high organic-pollutants-degrading capability. In SBBR, the NH₃-N removal related species (Hydrogenophaga, Gemmata and Nitrospira) screened by ML had higher abundance and stronger stability of microbial community structure, which could explain the difference of pollutant removal efficiency of SBBR from the microbial level.

Key words: wastewater, biofilm, high-throughput sequencing, microbial community structure, machine learning

中图分类号:

X703

吴绍琳, 刘文文, 魏镇欢, 陈滢, 张东. 不同时期排泥对培养SBBR生物膜的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(02): 1134-1139.

Shaolin WU, Wenwen LIU, Zhenhuan WEI, Ying CHEN, Dong ZHANG. Effects of sludge discharge stage on SBBR biofilm cultivation[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(02): 1134-1139.

图/表 6

参考文献 28

1	郑桂林. SBBR同步硝化反硝化的影响因素对溶解氧在生物膜中扩散的影响研究[D]. 广州: 广州大学, 2017.
	ZHENG L. Study on the effect of SBBR simultaneous nitrification and denitrification on the distribution of dissolved oxygen in biofilm[D]. Guangzhou: Guangzhou University, 2017.
2	杨涛, 郝学凯, 陈宝玉, 等. Al³⁺对序批式生物膜反应器（SBBR）中污泥脱氢酶活性（DHA）和胞外聚合物（EPS）的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2018, 38(4): 1453-1459.
	YANGT, HAOX K, CHENB Y, et al. Effects of Al³⁺ on dehydrogenase activity(DHA) and extracellular polymeric substances(EPS) of activated sludge in a sequencing batch biofilm reactor(SBBR)[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2018, 38(4): 1453-1459.
3	刘舒巍, 张从轩, 杨兴桐, 等. SBBR与人工湿地组合工艺脱氮除磷[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(8): 4527-4534.
	LIUS W, ZHANGC X, YANGX T, et al. Biological phosphorus and nitrogen removal by combined process of sequencing biofilm batch reactor and constructed wetland[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(8): 4527-4534.
4	王玉, 姚倩, 彭党聪, 等. 不同C/N值下SBBR中生物膜硝化特性研究[J]. 中国给水排水, 2016, 32(5): 23-27.
	WANGY, YAOQ, PENGD C, et al. Nitrification performance of biofilm in SBBR with different C/N ratios[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2016, 32(5): 23-27.
5	郑桂林, 张朝升, 曹勇锋, 等. DO在SBBR生物膜中传递及对同步硝化反硝化的影响[J]. 中国给水排水, 2016, 32(3): 22-26.
	ZHENGG L, ZHANGC S, CAOY F, et al. Transfer of DO in biofilm and effect of DO on simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in SBBR[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2016, 32(3): 22-26.
6	秦宇, 方芳, 郭劲松. pH值对SBBR自养脱氮系统效能及功能菌数量的影响[J]. 中国给水排水, 2012, 28(17): 36-39.
	QINY, FANGF, GUOJ S. Effect of pH on SBBR autotrophic nitrogen removal process[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2012, 28(17): 36-39.
7	周戈, 赵小晶, 梁红, 等. 不同温度对SBBR同步短程硝化反硝化处理炼油催化剂废水的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(6): 2869-2874.
	ZHOUG, ZHAOX J, LIANGH, et al. Effects of different temperatures on treatment of catalyst wastewater with simultaneous shortcut nitrification-denitrification in a SBBR[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015, 9(6): 2869-2874.
8	罗晓, 郑向阳, 赵丛丛, 等. A/O工艺中污泥浓度对微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018, 38(1): 275-283.
	LUOX, ZHENGX Y, ZHAOC C, et al. Effects of sludge concentration on microbial community structure in A/O process[J]. China Environmental Science, 2018, 38(1): 275-283.
9	XUY, WANGC, HOUJ, et al. Long term effects of cerium dioxide nanoparticles on the nitrogen removal micro-environment and community dynamics of a sequencing batch biofilm reactor[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 245: 573-580.
10	WANGJ f, DINGL L, LIK, et al. Estimation of spatial distribution of quorum sensing signaling in sequencing batch biofilm reactor (SBBR) biofilms[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 612: 405-414.
11	WANGJ Y, RONGH W, ZHANGC S. Evaluation of the impact of dissolved oxygen concentration on biofilm microbial community in sequencing batch biofilm reactor[J]. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2018, 125(5): 532-542.
12	MIAOL, ZHANGQ, WANGS Y, et al. Characterization of EPS compositions and microbial community in an anammox SBBR system treating landfill leachate[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 249: 108-116
13	GUNNEMANNS. Machine learning meets databases[J]. Datenbank Spektrum, 2017, 17: 77-83.
14	BECKD, FOSTERJ A. Machine learning techniques accurately classify microbial communities by bacterial vaginosis characteristics[J]. Plos One, 2014, 9(2): e87830.
15	YATSUNENKOT, REY F E, MANARYM J, et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography[J]. Nature, 2012, 486(7402): 222-227.
16	樊明颢. 不同温度对SBBR脱氮能力和菌群结构的影响研究[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2012.
	FANM H. Effects of temperature on denitrification capability and microbial community structure in SBBR[D]. Ya’an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2012.
17	安卫星, 高娜, 夏明, 等. 动胶菌属系统分类、生理特征及其在活性污泥中的作用[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2016, 22(6): 1167-1174.
	ANW X, GAON, XIAM, et al. Physiological characteristics and systematic classification of the Zoogloea species and their role in the activated sludge[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 2016, 22(6): 1167-1174.
18	范丽莎. 复极性三维电极耦合曝气生物滤池处理城市污水的试验研究[D]. 济南: 济南大学, 2015.
	FANL S. The research on the treatment of city sewage by complex three-dimensional electrode coupled biological aerated filter[D]. Jinan: University of Jinan, 2015.
19	侯洁. 生物炭对潜流人工湿地生物脱氮影响机理研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2017.
	HOUJ. Influences of biochar on biological nitrogen removal in subsurface flow constructed wetland[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2017.
20	杨浩, 张国珍, 杨晓妮, 等. 16S rRNA高通量测序研究集雨窖水中微生物群落结构及多样性[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(4): 1704-1716.
	YANGH, ZHANGG Z, YANGX N, et al. Microbial community structure and diversity in cellar water by 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing[J]. Environmental Science, 2017, 38(4): 1704-1716.
21	张洪勋, 郝春博, 白志辉. 嗜酸菌研究进展[J]. 微生物学杂志, 2006(2): 68-72.
	ZHANGH X, HAOC B, BAIZ H. Advance in acidophile[J]. Journal of Microbiology, 2006(2): 68-72.
22	陈瑜, 刘婉薇, 李良芳, 等. 功能性消化不良患者唾液菌群的研究[J]. 重庆医学, 2017, 46(13): 1789-1791, 1796.
	CHENY, LIUW W, LIL F, et al. Analysis on saliva microbiome in patients with functional dyspepsia[J]. Chongqing Medicine, 2017, 46(13): 1789-1791, 1796.
23	韦云萍, 赵云, 张金龙, 等. 嗜糖假单胞菌麦芽四糖淀粉酶的枯草芽孢杆菌表达及酶学性质分析[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2014, 40(5): 70-76.
	WEIY P, ZHAOY, ZHANGJ L, et al. Properties of the enzyme expressed by the optimized Pseudomonas accharophila maltotetraohydrolase gene (mta) in Bacillus subtilis[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2014, 40(5): 70-76.
24	陈接锋, 许旭萍, 李惠珍. 球衣菌属的研究概况[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2002(6): 43-46, 49.
	CHENJ F, XUX P, LIH Z. Research overview of Schizophyllum[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2002(6): 43-46, 49.
25	BRONWYND H, RAYMONDL C, WENDYM, et al. Using the Gini coefficient with BIOLOG substrate utilisation datato provide an alternative quantitative measure for comparing bacterial soil communities[J]. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 1997, 30(1): 91-101.
26	李青, 成小英. 不同填料生物反应器中脱氮微生物群落比较分析[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2017, 17(6): 2360-2365.
	LIQ, CHENGX Y. Discriminative analysis of denitrifying microbial communities in bioreactors with different materials as biofilm carriers[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2017, 17(6): 2360-2365.
27	王国宏. 再论生物多样性与生态系统的稳定性[J]. 生物多样性, 2002, 10(1): 126-134.
	WANGG H. Further thoughts on diversity and stability in ecosystems[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2002, 10(1): 126-134.
28	沈烽, 黄睿, 王司辰, 等. 不同OTUs划分阈值对湖泊浮游细菌α多样性的影响[J]. 化学与生物工程, 2016, 33(2): 59-60.
	SHENF, HUANGR, WANGS C, et al. Effects of different OTUs cutoff values on α-diversity of Bacterioplankton in lake[J]. Chemistry & Bioengineering, 2016, 33(2): 59-60.

菌属	功能	A1	A2	A3
Zoogloea （动胶菌属）	降解有机物、脱氮除磷^[17]	6.77%	10.01%	10.42%
Ferruginibacter （铁锈菌）	降解有机物^[18]、脱氮[^19]	6.21%	9.50%	4.62%
Hydrogenophaga （氢噬胞菌属）	异养硝化，好氧反硝化^[20]	1.16%	3.25%	2.26%
Acidovorax （嗜酸菌属）	降解有机物^[21]	3.17%	2.97%	4.47%
Neisseria （奈瑟菌属）	降解有机物^[22]	2.63%	2.85%	1.15%
Pelomonas （嗜糖假单胞菌属）	降解有机物^[23]	4.18%	2.54%	4.70%
Sphaerotilus （球衣细胞属）	降解有机物^[24]	1.33%	1.91%	0.40%

菌属	功能	A1	A2	A3
Zoogloea （动胶菌属）	降解有机物、脱氮除磷^[17]	6.77%	10.01%	10.42%
Ferruginibacter （铁锈菌）	降解有机物^[18]、脱氮[^19]	6.21%	9.50%	4.62%
Hydrogenophaga （氢噬胞菌属）	异养硝化，好氧反硝化^[20]	1.16%	3.25%	2.26%
Acidovorax （嗜酸菌属）	降解有机物^[21]	3.17%	2.97%	4.47%
Neisseria （奈瑟菌属）	降解有机物^[22]	2.63%	2.85%	1.15%
Pelomonas （嗜糖假单胞菌属）	降解有机物^[23]	4.18%	2.54%	4.70%
Sphaerotilus （球衣细胞属）	降解有机物^[24]	1.33%	1.91%	0.40%

反应器	OTUs	Chao1	Shannon	InvSimpson
A1	553±17	758±84	4.20±0.12	27.5±4.6
A2	615±32	933±99	4.47±0.05	36.9±3.6
A3	577±23	770±132	4.41±0.06	36.4±2.3

反应器	OTUs	Chao1	Shannon	InvSimpson
A1	553±17	758±84	4.20±0.12	27.5±4.6
A2	615±32	933±99	4.47±0.05	36.9±3.6
A3	577±23	770±132	4.41±0.06	36.4±2.3

[1]	许春树, 姚庆达, 梁永贤, 周华龙. 共价有机框架材料功能化策略及其对Hg(Ⅱ)和Cr(Ⅵ)的吸附性能研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 461-478.
[2]	赵景超, 谭明. 表面活性剂对电渗析减量化工业含盐废水的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 529-535.
[3]	王晨, 白浩良, 康雪. 大功率UV-LED散热与纳米TiO₂光催化酸性红26耦合系统性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4905-4916.
[4]	王琦, 寇丽红, 王冠宇, 王吉坤, 刘敏, 李兰廷, 王昊. 焦化废水生物出水中可溶解性有机物的分子识别[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4984-4993.
[5]	史天茜, 石永辉, 武新颖, 张益豪, 秦哲, 赵春霞, 路达. Fe²⁺对厌氧氨氧化EGSB反应器运行性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 5003-5010.
[6]	郑梦启, 王成业, 汪炎, 王伟, 袁守军, 胡真虎, 何春华, 王杰, 梅红. 菌藻共生技术在工业废水零排放中的应用与展望[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4424-4431.
[7]	陈娜, 张肖静, 张楠, 马冰冰, 张涵, 杨浩洁, 张宏忠. 淬灭酶对亚硝化-混合自养脱氮系统的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3816-3823.
[8]	陈香李, 李倩倩, 张甜, 李彪, 李康康. 自愈合油水分离膜的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3600-3610.
[9]	李白雪, 信欣, 朱羽蒙, 刘琴, 刘鑫. SASD-A体系构建及进水不同S/N对脱氮工艺的影响机制[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3261-3271.
[10]	杨红梅, 高涛, 鱼涛, 屈撑囤, 高家朋. 高铁酸盐处理难降解有机物磺化酚醛树脂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3302-3308.
[11]	李华华, 李逸航, 金北辰, 李隆昕, 成少安. 厌氧氨氧化-生物电化学耦合废水处理系统的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2678-2690.
[12]	朱昊, 刘汉飞, 高源, 白蓉蓉, 倪嵩波, 黄益平, 李庆同, 李小东, 韩卫清. 催化臭氧化体系射流曝气系统参数优化及苯酚阶段氧化分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2717-2723.
[13]	黄起中, 刘冰, 马红鹏, 吕文杰. 基于新型微通道分离技术的甲醇制烯烃废水处理[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 669-676.
[14]	刘丹, 范云洁, 王慧敏, 严政, 李鹏飞, 李家成, 曹雪波. 基于废弃PET的高值化功能性多孔碳材料及其应用进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 969-984.
[15]	张涵, 张肖静, 马冰冰, 佴灿, 刘烁烁, 马永鹏, 宋亚丽. 以城市废弃污泥为种泥启动厌氧氨氧化工艺的可行性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 1080-1088.