光催化膜对水中腐植酸的去除及积垢机理

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-2663

化工进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (09): 3649-3656.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-2663

光催化膜对水中腐植酸的去除及积垢机理

饶瑞晔^1,2,3, 毛竹简^1,2, 林靖靖¹, 廖夏露¹, 胡家朋^1,2, 林皓^1,2

1 武夷学院生态与资源工程学院, 福建武夷山 354300;
2 福建省生态产业绿色技术重点实验室(武夷学院), 福建武夷山 354300;
3 福建省特色生物化工材料重点实验室(宁德师范学院), 福建宁德 352100

收稿日期:2017-12-25 修回日期:2018-01-09 出版日期:2018-09-05 发布日期:2018-09-05
通讯作者: 饶瑞晔(1981-),男,副教授,从事环境功能材料及污染治理与控制研究。
作者简介:饶瑞晔(1981-),男,副教授,从事环境功能材料及污染治理与控制研究。E-mail:jyrau@wuyiu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51406141）、福建省教育厅项目（JA13321）、福建省特色化工重点实验室项目（FJKL-FMBI201602）、福建省生态产业绿色技术重点实验室项目（WYKF2018-9）及大学生创新创业训练计划项目（201510397014）。

Removal of humic acid from water and fouling mechanism by photocatalytic membrane

RAU Juiyeh^1,2,3, MAO Zhujian^1,2, LIN Jingjing¹, LIAO Xialu¹, HU Jiapeng^1,2, LIN Hao^1,2

1 Department of Ecology and Resource Engineering, Wuyi University, Wuyishan 354300, Fujian, China;
2 Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-Industrial Green Technology(Wuyi University), Wuyishan 354300, Fujian, China;
3 Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Featured Materials in Biochemical Industry(Ningde Normal University), Ningde 352100, Fujian, China

Received:2017-12-25 Revised:2018-01-09 Online:2018-09-05 Published:2018-09-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用湿式相转化方法制备TiO₂/聚苯砜（polyphenylsulfone，PPSU）/聚醚亚硫胺（polyetherimide，PEI）催化膜应用于水中腐植酸（humic acid，HAs）的去除及积垢机理研究。结果表明，随着亲水性PEI比例增加，光催化膜的纯水通量和HAs的过滤通量越大，去除效率越低；且随着光照时间的延长去除效率越趋于稳定，且有回复的现象。在0.2MPa操作压力下，制备的TiO₂/PPSU/PEI （1%/50%/50%）膜具有最佳的可逆阻抗力比例（R_c/R_t=48.24%）；其渗透通量、HAs去除效率及反洗后通量分别为34.0L/（m²·h）、63.2%及22.5L/（m²·h），具有较佳的通量及HAs去除效率。

关键词: 二氧化钛, 催化膜, 腐植酸, 聚苯砜, 聚醚亚硫胺

Abstract: The preparation of TiO₂/polyphenylsulfone (PPSU)/polyetherimide (PEI) photocatalytic membrane by using wet phase transformation method was studied. The control of humic acid (HAs) and fouling mechanism from wastewater were also investigated. Results showed that the increasing of PEI ratio, water and filtration flux of humic acid were higher and the removal efficiency of humic acid was lower. With the extension of illumination time, the removal efficiencies were tended to stable and there was a recovery phenomenon. Under 0.2 MPa operating pressure, the prepared TiO₂/PPSU/PEI photocatalytic membrane (1%/50%/50%) were the good reversible resistance ratio (R_c/R_t=48.24%), flux and HAs removal efficiency. The permeate flux, photocatalytic removal efficiency of HAs and backwash flux were 34.0L/(m²·h)、63.2% and 22.5L/(m²·h), respectively.

Key words: titanium dioxide (TiO₂), photocatalytic membrane, humic acid (HAs), polyphenylsulfone (PPSU), polyetherimide (PEI)

中图分类号:

X52
TQ032

饶瑞晔, 毛竹简, 林靖靖, 廖夏露, 胡家朋, 林皓. 光催化膜对水中腐植酸的去除及积垢机理[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(09): 3649-3656.

RAU Juiyeh, MAO Zhujian, LIN Jingjing, LIAO Xialu, HU Jiapeng, LIN Hao. Removal of humic acid from water and fouling mechanism by photocatalytic membrane[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(09): 3649-3656.

参考文献

[1] SIHOMBING R, GREENWOOD P F, WILSON M A, et al. Composition of size exclusion fractions of swamp water humic and fulvic acids as measured by solid state NMR andpyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 1996, 24(8):859-873.
[2] YUAN W, ZYDNEY A L. Hunic acid fouling during microfiltration[J]. Journal of Science, 1999, 157(1):1-12.
[3] 张惠, 于海琴. 水中天然有机物对超滤膜污染的研究[J]. 工业用水与废水, 2007, 38(4):98-101. ZHANG H, YU H Q. Study on the contamination of ultrafiltration membrane by natural organic compounds in water[J]. Industrial Water and Wastewater, 2007, 38(4):98-101.
[4] JUCKER C, CLARK M. Adosrption of aquatic hunic substances on hydrophobic ultrafiltration mambranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 1994, 97:37-52.
[5] 周艺, 黄可龙, 朱志平, 等. Gd/N共掺杂纳米TiO₂ 的制备及对腐殖酸的降解[J]. 中山大学学报, 2008, 39(4):677-681. ZHOU Y, HUANG K L, ZHU Z P, et al. Preparation of Gd/N co-doped nano-TiO₂ and its degradation of humic acid[J]. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University, 2008, 39(4):677-681.
[6] CHO J, AMY G, PELLEGRINO J, et al. Characterization of clean and natural organicmatter (NOM) fouled NF and UF membranes,and foulants characterization[J]. Desalination, 1998, 118(1/2/3):101-108.
[7] MANNING T J, BENNETT T, MILTON D. Aggregation studies of humic acid usingmultian-gle laser light scattering[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2000, 2572(3):171-176.
[8] YOON S H, KIM J S. Effect of the origin of humic acids on nanofilter fouling indrinking water production[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2000, 55(21):5171-5175.
[9] 刘振中, 宋刚福.水源水中腐殖酸的危害及去除方法[J].江西科技大学学报, 2006, 24(4):247-252. LIU Z Z, SONG G F. Harm of water in the humic acid and removal methods[J]. Journal of Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, 2006, 24(4):247-252.
[10] OHYA Tomokazu, NAKAYAMA Aki, SHIBATA Yukio, et al. Preparation and characterization of titania thin films from aqueous solutions[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2003, 26(4):799-802.
[11] SHACHAM Ronen, AVNIR David, MANDLER Daniel. Electrodeposition of dye-dopedtitania thin films[J]. Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, 2004, 31(3):329-334.
[12] 施周, 张文辉. 环境纳米技术[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社, 2003. SHI Z, ZHANG W H. Environmental nanotechnology[M]. Beijing:Chemical Industry Press, 2003.
[13] RYU Y B, LEE M S, PARK S S, et al. Effect of synthesis temperature on the preparation of titanium dioxides by the hydrothermal method. photocatalytic activity[J]. Reaction Kinetics and Catalysis Letters, 2005, 84:101-108.
[14] 任成军, 钟本和, 周大利, 等. 水热法制备高活性TiO₂ 光催化剂的研究进展[J]. 稀有金属, 2004, 28(5):903-906. REN C G, ZHONG B H, ZHOU D L, et al. Hydrothermal preparation of high activity TiO₂ photocatalyst[J]. Chinese Journal of Rare Metals, 2004, 28(5):903-906.
[15] KROP Sam, MEIJER H E H, VAN BREEMEN L C A. Finite element modeling and experimental validation of single-asperity sliding friction of diamond against reinforced and non-filled polycarbonate[J]. Wear, 2016, 356/357:77-85
[16] YANG Y, ZHANG H, WANG P, et al. The influence of nano-size TiO₂ fillers on the morphologies and properties of PSF UF membrane[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2007, 288(1/2):231-238.
[17] SU Nan, HU Xiulan, ZHANG Jianbo, et al. Plasma-induced synthesis of Pt nanoparticles supported on TiO₂ nanotubes for enhanced methanol electro-oxidation[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2017, 399:403-410.
[18] WANG Qi, ZHU Naxin, LIU Enqin, et al. Fabrication of visible-light active Fe₂O₃ -GQDs/NF-TiO₂ composite film with highly enhanced photo electrocatalytic performance[J]. Applied Catalysis B:Environmental, 2017, 205(15):347-356.
[19] HWANG L L, TSENG H H, CHEN J C. Fabrication of polyphenylsulfone/polyetherimide blend membranes for ultrafiltration applications:the effects of blending ratio on membrane properties and humic acid removal performance[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, 384(1/2):72-81.
[20] SHEN J N, RUAN H M, WU L G, et al. Preparation and Characterizat-ion of PES-SiO₂ organic-inorganic composite ultrafiltration mambrane for raw water pretreatment[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 168(3):1272-1278.
[21] 林何印. 超滤与逆渗透膜程序处理及回收工业废水之研究[D]. 台湾:台湾中央大学, 2005. LIN H Y. Ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane process and recovery of industrial wastewater[D]. Taiwan:Central University, China, 2005.
[22] BOWEN W R, DONEVA T A, YIN H B. Separation of humic acid from a model surface water with PSU/SPEEK blend UF/NF membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2002, 206:417-429.
[23] DI VONA M Luisa, D'EPIFANIO Alessandra, MARANI Debora, et al. SPEEK/PPSU-based organic-inorganic membranes:proton conducting electrolytes in anhydrous and wet environments[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 279:186-191.
[24] KIM I C, LEE K H. Effect of poly(ethylene glycol) 200 on the formation of a polyetherimide asymmetric membrane and its performance in aqueous solvent mixture permeation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2004, 230:183-188.
[25] AHN J R, HWANG C C, AN K S. Photoemission spectroscopy study of Na-induced phase transitions on Si(113)[J]. Vacuum, 2006, 81:226-229.
[26] CUPERUS F P, SMOLDERS C A. Characterization of UF membranes:membrane characteristics and characterization techniques[J]. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 1991, 34:135-173.
[27] ARTHANAREESWARAN G, SRIYAMUNA DEVI T K, RAAJENTHIREN M. Effect of silica particles on cellulose acetate blend ultrafiltration membranes:Part Ⅰ[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2008, 64:38-47.
[28] SU Yanlei, LI Chao, ZHAO Wei, et al. Modification of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes with phosphorylcholine copolymer can remarkably improve the antifouling and permeation properties[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 322:171-177.
[29] YANG J K, LEE S M. Removal of Cr(Ⅵ) and humic acid by using TiO₂ Phot-ocatalysis[J]. Chemosphere, 2006, 63(10):1677-1684.

光催化膜对水中腐植酸的去除及积垢机理

Removal of humic acid from water and fouling mechanism by photocatalytic membrane

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孔倩, 孙巾超, 葛佳琪, 张鹏, 马艳龙, 刘百军. 沉淀剂对NiW/TiO₂-ASA催化剂加氢裂化性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(1): 265-271.
[2]	戴绍铃, 于桢, 李逸航, 成少安. 多层纳米结构蓝色TiO₂的电化学氧化性能和稳定性[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(2): 862-873.
[3]	崔维怡, 丁国敏, 谭乃迪. 二氧化钛基催化剂催化氧化甲醛的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(12): 6310-6318.
[4]	胡楠, 陈林, 李会珍, 张思瑶, 张志军. 强化泡沫排液下浮选富集和回收工程纳米颗粒[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(1): 485-492.
[5]	孙通, 许东东, 宋民航, 靳星, 黄云. 火焰合成法制备TiO₂的燃烧发生器研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(1): 17-29.
[6]	张轩, 郑丽君. 光解水制氢单相催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S1): 215-222.
[7]	蒋彩云, 吴婷, 周海飞, 王玉萍. 一种可温度与pH调控的分子印迹光催化材料的制备及其性能[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(1): 305-312.
[8]	董璐, 黄亚继, 丁守一, 程好强, 王圣, 段钰锋. Ti-Al复合载体载锰催化剂同时脱硝脱汞实验[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(1): 234-241.
[9]	李晓静, 张永春, 陈绍云. 改性氧化钛对羟乙基乙二胺水溶液解吸CO₂的强化[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(5): 2026-2032.
[10]	张巧玲, 秦钊, 刘有智, 师艳婷, 张竞文, 曾广平. 氧化石墨烯-TiO₂复合材料对三种染料的吸附动力学及光催化性能[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(06): 2870-2879.
[11]	曹浩, 陆金仁, 李伟琪, 包木太, 李一鸣, 马威伊. TNAs的制备条件及可见光下GQDs/TNAs复合材料的性能初探[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(02): 1000-1009.
[12]	张崇淼, 温银梅, 高敏, 高倩. TiO₂、ZnO和TiO₂/ZnO三种氧化物粉体材料的抗菌性能对比[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(11): 4343-4348.
[13]	颜平平, 隋倩, 吕树光, 邱兆富. 二价铁活化过碳酸钠对磺胺甲唑的去除[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(09): 3635-3639.
[14]	李彬, 陈星炜, 张天永, 姜爽, 张光辉, 吴武斌. 色氨酸辅助合成光催化活性增强的球形纳米TiO₂[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(01): 175-181.
[15]	杨凌肖, 王琼, 刘治君, 李乃稳. 光催化氧化去除水源水低浓度有机物的应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(S1): 469-475.