热重-红外联用(TG-FTIR)分析含油污泥-废轮胎混合热解特性

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-1182

化工进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 4692-4699.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-1182

热重-红外联用(TG-FTIR)分析含油污泥-废轮胎混合热解特性

吕全伟^1,2, 林顺洪^1,2, 柏继松^1,2, 李长江^1,2, 江辽^1,2, 李伟^1,2

1 重庆科技学院机械与动力工程学院, 重庆 401331;
2 重庆科技学院垃圾焚烧发电技术研究院, 重庆 401331

收稿日期:2017-06-14 修回日期:2017-08-14 出版日期:2017-12-05 发布日期:2017-12-05
通讯作者: 柏继松,博士,副教授,研究方向为固体废弃物能源化利用技术。
作者简介:吕全伟(1992-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为固体废弃物能源化利用技术。E-mail:593185510@qq.com。
基金资助:
重庆市科技研究基地能力提升（cstc2014pt-gc20001）、重庆市高校成果转化（KJZH14108）及重庆科技学院研究生科技创新计划（YKJCX1620306）项目。

Analysis the co-pyrolysis characteristic of oily sludge with waste tires using thermogravimetric analysis-Fourier transform infrared spectrometer(TG-FTIR)

LÜ Quanwei^1,2, LIN Shunhong^1,2, BAI Jisong^1,2, LI Changjiang^1,2, JIANG Liao^1,2, LI Wei^1,2

1 College of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing 401331, China;
2 Chongqing Waste to Energy Research & Technology Institute, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing 401331, China

Received:2017-06-14 Revised:2017-08-14 Online:2017-12-05 Published:2017-12-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为含油污泥和废轮胎共热解工艺的开发与设计提供数据支撑，采用热重-红外联用（TG-FTIR）对含油污泥与废轮胎在不同混合比例下的热解动力学和气体析出特性进行了分析。研究发现，随着废轮胎掺混质量分数增加（从10%到50%），初始热解温度逐渐增加（从311.80℃到335.30℃），但热解特性指数也逐渐增加（从5.41×10^-11到1.53×10^-10），同时热解终温逐渐减小。由此表明混合热解可弥补单物料热解存在的不足。通过协同作用分析发现，不同的混合比例热解，相互作用及作用程度不同；利用Coats-Redfern法对混合热解过程动力学分析发现，第二阶段（500～800℃）所需的活化能最低，第三阶段（800～1200℃）最高；通过FTIR分析发现，热解主要生成H₂O、CO₂、CO、CH₄等物质；结合综合热解特性指数、相互作用和热解效率指数分析发现，对于以含油污泥处理为主的混合热解，掺混废轮胎比例为50%时可获得较多的可燃气体。

关键词: 热重-红外联用, 含油污泥, 废轮胎, 动力学分析, 气体析出特性, 相互作用

Abstract: In order to provide data support for the development and design of co-pyrolysis technology of oily sludge(OS)and waste tires(WT),pyrolysis kinetics and evolved gas characteristics during co-pyrolysis of oil sludge with waste tires at various blend ratios were investigated using thermogravimetric analysis-Fourier transform infrared spectrometer(TG-FTIR). It was found that with the WT blend ratio increases,the initial pyrolysis temperature increased(from 311.80℃ to 335.30℃),but the pyrolysis characteristic index increased(from 5.41×10^-11 to 1.53×10^-10)and the terminated pyrolysis temperature decreases,which indicated that co-pyrolysis could make up for the shortage of the single material pyrolysis. Synergy analysis showed that there is a synergistic effect between the co-pyrolysis process of OS and WT,and the interaction and the degree of interaction were different for fferent blend ratios. The kinetic analysis of the co-pyrolysis process using the Coats-Redfern method di showed that the required of activation energy for the second stage(500-800℃)was the lowest and the third stage(800-1200℃)was highest during the whole reaction stage. From the FTIR analysis results,it was found that co-pyrolysis mainly produced H₂O,CO₂,CO,CH₄. Combined with the comprehensive pyrolysis index,synergistic effect and pyrolysis efficiency index,it was found that more combustible gas could be obtained when the blend ratios of WT was 50%.

Key words: TG-FTIR, oily sludge, waste tires, kinetic analysis, evolved gas characteristics, synergistic effect

中图分类号:

X742

吕全伟, 林顺洪, 柏继松, 李长江, 江辽, 李伟. 热重-红外联用(TG-FTIR)分析含油污泥-废轮胎混合热解特性[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(12): 4692-4699.

LÜ Quanwei, LIN Shunhong, BAI Jisong, LI Changjiang, JIANG Liao, LI Wei. Analysis the co-pyrolysis characteristic of oily sludge with waste tires using thermogravimetric analysis-Fourier transform infrared spectrometer(TG-FTIR)[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(12): 4692-4699.

参考文献

[1] HU G,LI J,ZENG G. Recent development in the treatment of oily sludge from petroleum industry:a review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2013,261(13):470.
[2] 祝威. 石油污染土壤和油泥生物处理技术[M]. 北京:中国石化出版社,2010:85-94. ZHU Wei. Petroleum contaminated soil and sludge biological treatment technology[M]. Beijing:China Petrochemical Press,2010:85-94.
[3] 魏彦林,吕蕾,杨志刚,等. 含油污泥回收处理技术进展[J]. 油田化学,2015,32(1):151-158. WEI Yanlin,LV Lei,YANG Zhigang,et al. Progress in recovery technology of oily sludge[J]. Oilfield Chemistry,2015,32(1):151-158.
[4] DENG S,WANG X,TAN H,et al. Thermogravimetric study on the co-combustion characteristics of oily sludge with plant biomass[J]. Thermochimica Acta,2016,633:69-76.
[5] 金喆. 石油石化行业含油污泥无害化处理技术综述[J]. 石化技术,2015(12):129-130. JIN Zhe. Review of harmless treatment of oily sludge in petroleum and petrochemical industry[J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology,2015(12):129-130.
[6] 李彦超,张元法,曹成章,等. 含油污泥高温燃烧利用技术研究[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2010,25(1):65-67. LI Yanchao,ZHANG Yuanfa,CAO Chengzhang,et al. Study on high temperature combustion technology of oily sludge[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition),2010,25(1):65-67.
[7] 王凤超,屈撑囤,王益军. 含油污泥与煤混烧技术的研究进展[J]. 广州化工,2016,44(23):7-9. WANG Fengchao,QU Chengtun,WANG Yijun. Research progress on oily sludge and coal mixed burning technology[J]. Guangzhou Chemical Industry,2016,44(23):7-9.
[8] CHANG Chingyuan,SHIE Jelueng,LIN Jyhping,et al. Major products obtained from the pyrolysis of oil sludge[J]. Energy & Fuels,2000,14(6):1176-1183.
[9] WANG Zhiqi,GUO Qingjie,LIU Xinmin,et al. Low temperature pyrolysis characteristics of oil sludge under various heating conditions[J]. Energy & Fuels,2007,21(2):957-962.
[10] FERNANDEZ A M,BARRIOCANAL C,ALVAREZ R. Pyrolysis of a waste from the grinding of scrap tyres[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2011,203/204:236-243.
[11] SONG W,LIU J,NIE Y. Pyrolysis behaviors of oil sludge based on TG/FTIR and PY-GC/MS[J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering,2010,4(1):59-64.
[12] LI S,MA X,LIU G,et al. A TG-FTIR investigation to the co-pyrolysis of oil shale with coal[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis,2016,120:540-548.
[13] LIN Y,MA X,YU Z,et al. Investigation on thermochemical behavior of co-pyrolysis between oil-palm solid wastes and paper sludge[J]. Bioresource Technology,2014,166:444-450.
[14] 唐夕山,张卫华,李冬庆. 废轮胎燃烧特性的热重分析[J]. 南京工业大学学报(自然科学版),2006,28(2):85-88. TANG Xishan,ZHANG Weihua,LI Dongqing. Combustion characteristics of the waste tire by thermogravmietric analysis[J]. Jouranl of Nanjing Tech University(Natural Science Edition),2006,28(2):85-88.
[15] ZHANG J,SHAN R E N,SU B,et al. Combustion ratio of waste tire particle,PC and mixture at blast temperature of BF[J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research,International,2012,19(2):12-16.
[16] 梁文杰. 重质油化学[M]. 东营:石油大学出版社,2000:15-25. LIANG Wenjie. Chemistry of heavy oil[M]. Dongying:University of Petroleum Press,2000:15-25.
[17] 周雄,李伟,柏继松,等. N₂/CO₂气氛下含油污泥热解特性实验研究[J]. 热力发电,2016,45(10):64-69. ZHOU Xiong,LI Wei,BAI Jisong,et al. Experimental investigation on pyrolysis characteristics of oil sludge under N₂ and CO₂ atmosphere[J]. Thermal Power Generation,2016,45(10):64-69.
[18] 陈守燕. 废轮胎热解特性的试验研究[D]. 济南:山东大学,2005. CHEN Shouyan. Experimental study on pyrolysis characteristics of waste tires[D]. Jinan:Shandong University,2005.
[19] PENG X,MA X,LIN Y,et al. Co-pyrolysis between microalgae and textile dyeing sludge by TG-FTIR:kinetics and products[J]. Energy Conversion and Management,2015,100:391-402.
[20] LOPEZ GONZALEZ D,FERNANDEZ LOPEZ M,VALVERDE J L,et al. Kinetic analysis and thermal characterization of the microalgae combustion process by thermal analysis coupled to mass spectrometry[J]. Applied Energy,2014,114:227-237.
[21] ABOULKAS A,El H K,El B A. Pyrolysis of olive residue/low density polyethylene mixture:Part Ⅰ. Thermogravimetric kinetics[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology,2008,36(6):672-678.
[22] CHOUDHURY D,BORAH R C,GOSWAMEE R L,et al. Non-isothermal thermogravimetric pyrolysis kinetics of waste petroleum refinery sludge by isoconversional approach[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry,2007,89(3):965-970.
[23] 刘振海. 热分析导论[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社,1991. LIU Zhenhai. Introduction to themal analysis[M]. Beijing:Beijing Industry Press,1991.
[24] COATS A W,REDFERN J P. Kinetic parameters from thermogravimetric data[J]. Nature,1964,201(4914):68-69.
[25] ZHAO J,WANG X,HU J,et al. Thermal degradation of softwood lignin and hardwood lignin by TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS[J]. Polymer Degradation & Stability,2014,108:133-138.
[26] PARSHETTI G K,QUEK A,BETHA R,et al. TGA-FTIR investigation of co-combustion characteristics of blends of hydrothermally carbonized oil palm biomass(EFB) and coal[J]. Fuel Processing Technology,2014,118:228-234.
[27] LAKSMONO N,PARASCHIV M,LOUBAR K,et al. Biodiesel production from biomass gasification tar via thermal/catalytic cracking[J]. Fuel Processing Technology,2013,106:776-783.

热重-红外联用(TG-FTIR)分析含油污泥-废轮胎混合热解特性

Analysis the co-pyrolysis characteristic of oily sludge with waste tires using thermogravimetric analysis-Fourier transform infrared spectrometer(TG-FTIR)

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘阳, 王云刚, 修浩然, 邹立, 白彦渊. 基于动力学分析的核桃壳最佳炭化工艺[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 94-103.
[2]	王家庆, 宋广伟, 李强, 郭帅成, DAI Qingli. 橡胶混凝土界面改性方法及性能提升路径[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 328-343.
[3]	杨子育, 朱玲, 王文龙, 于超凡, 桑义敏. 阴燃法处理含油污泥的研究及应用进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3760-3769.
[4]	路建美. 柔性吸附材料最新研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2781-2798.
[5]	潘宇涵, 徐俊, 赵光杰, 林诚乾, 金亮, 薛志亮, 周永刚, 黄群星. 废轮胎梯级热解中试装置开发与产物特性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1240-1247.
[6]	杨娟娟, 何林, 贺常晴, 李鑫钢, 隋红. 含油污泥多相复合调质降黏破乳分离过程[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 614-623.
[7]	段一航, 高宁博, 全翠. 水热处理对含油污泥热解特性及动力学影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 603-613.
[8]	季炫宇, 林伟坚, 周雄, 柏继松, 杨宇, 孔杰, 廖重阳. 废轮胎热裂解技术研究现状与进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(8): 4498-4512.
[9]	蒋华义, 胡娟, 齐红媛, 游琰真, 王玉龙, 武哲. 磁性纳米粒子类型和质量浓度对微波热解含油污泥的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(7): 3908-3914.
[10]	王宇晶, 张楠, 刘涉江, 苗辰, 刘秀丽. 热化学清洗含油污泥的效果评价及机理[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(6): 3333-3340.
[11]	倪清, 来锦波, 彭东岳, 管翠诗, 龙军. 离子液体萃取分离烃类化合物的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(2): 619-627.
[12]	樊相汝, 羊依金, 郭旭晶, 张全碧. 软锰矿-含油污泥基活性炭对亚甲基蓝的吸附特性[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(12): 6664-6671.
[13]	贾文龙, 宋硕硕, 李长俊, 吴瑕, 杨帆, 张员瑞. 超临界CO₂萃取含油污泥研究现状与进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(12): 6573-6585.
[14]	郑发, 李浩文, 林法伟, 张岩, 吴越强, 陈钊, 马文臣, 陈冠益. 大庆罐底油泥热解特性及污染物释放特性[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(1): 476-484.
[15]	张乾, 向欣宁, 梁丽彤, 刘建伟, 王志青, 房倚天, 黄伟. 热重分析煤焦恒温气化过程中气体切换的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(1): 166-173.