挡板的相对曲率对分离器入口局域流场流体力学性能的影响

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-1083

化工进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 3963-3970.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-1083

挡板的相对曲率对分离器入口局域流场流体力学性能的影响

张静^1,2, 刘晓亮², 龚斌², 李雅侠², 吴剑华^1,2

1. 天津大学化工学院, 天津 300072;
2. 沈阳化工大学辽宁省化工新技术转移推广中心, 辽宁沈阳 110142

收稿日期:2017-06-06 修回日期:2017-07-07 出版日期:2017-11-05 发布日期:2017-11-05
通讯作者: 吴剑华,教授,研究方向为化工过程强化。
作者简介:张静(1971-),女,博士研究生,副教授。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51506133）、辽宁省自然科学基金（201602595）及辽宁省博士科研启动基金（201601199）项目。

Effect of inlet baffle curvature ratio on the local flow fields in a separator

ZHANG Jing^1,2, LIU Xiaoliang², GONG Bin², LI Yaxia², WU Jianhua^1,2

1. School of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China;
2. Center of New Chemical Technology Transfer and Promotion Liaoning Province, Shenyang University of Chemical Technology, Shenyang 110142, Liaoning, China

Received:2017-06-06 Revised:2017-07-07 Online:2017-11-05 Published:2017-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以立式圆筒体非均相分离器入口处的冲击挡板为研究对象，探究挡板的结构参数——相对曲率K对入口局域流体力学性能的影响。以水为介质，在K=-0.15~0.25范围内，利用计算流体力学三维湍流数值模拟，研究了凹柱面K>0、平面K=0和凸柱面K<0共3个类型的9种挡板结构入口局域流场的压力和阻力特性，分析了挡板结构对分离器入口受限空间冲击射流的影响机理。结果表明，随着相对曲率的降低，挡板所受冲击力下降，入口局域阻力下降。相对平挡板，K=-0.1的凸柱面挡板局域阻力相对降低2.8%，K=0.1的凹柱面挡板相对提高2.0%。在受限空间内，挡板相对曲率改变了射流冲击间距，影响了入口局域流场结构和静压力分布。凹柱面挡板有效地加长了冲击间距，限制了射流在冲击区轴向和径向扩展。而凸柱面挡板则缩短了冲击间距，有利于射流的扩展。射流冲击区对壁面射流区切向速度分布及挡板出口速度分布起到了决定性作用。

关键词: 挡板, 相对曲率, 数值模拟, 局域流场

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the flow characteristics of local flow field in the vertical cylinder separator with inlet baffle at different curvature ratios (K). Computational fluid dynamics(CFD) was used to numerically calculate the three-dimensional turbulent flow for separators. The effect of K values was researched within the scope of -0.15-0.25 and baffles were classified into concave surface K>0,plate K=0 and convex surface K<0. The stagnation pressure and local resistance were calculated. Water was used as working fluid. The mechanism was analyzed at different K values about impinging jet in limited narrow space of separator inlet.The results showed that the impact on the baffle wall and the local flow resistance declines with the decrease of the curvature ratio K in the separator inlet. The average local resistance coefficient of K=-0.1 is 2.8% lower than that of K=0,and K=0.1 is 2.0% higher. The local flow structures and the static pressure distribution were altered by different K. For the case of concave surface,jet expansion was limited in the impacted area due to the enlarging of jet exit-to-surface distance L. On the contrary,the convex surface was beneficial to the impinging jet expansion. Distribution of tangential velocity in wall jet region and baffle outlet was deeply affected by impacted area.

Key words: baffle, curvature ratio, numerical simulation, local flow field

中图分类号:

O358

张静, 刘晓亮, 龚斌, 李雅侠, 吴剑华. 挡板的相对曲率对分离器入口局域流场流体力学性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(11): 3963-3970.

ZHANG Jing, LIU Xiaoliang, GONG Bin, LI Yaxia, WU Jianhua. Effect of inlet baffle curvature ratio on the local flow fields in a separator[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(11): 3963-3970.

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会. 热交换器:GB/T 151-2014[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2015. General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China,Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Heat exchangers:GB/T 151-2014[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China,2015.
[2] COOPER D,JACKSON D C,LAUNDER B E,et al. Impinging jet studies for turbulence model assessment——Ⅰ. Flow-field experiments[J]. International Journal of Heat & Mass Transfer,1993,36(10):2675-2684.
[3] WIENAND J,RIEDELSHEIMER A,WEIGAND B. Numerical study of a turbulent impinging jet for different jet-to-plate distances using two-equation turbulence models[J]. European Journal of Mechanics B:Fluids,2017,61:210-217.
[4] KNOWLES K,MYSZKO M. Turbulence measurements in radial wall-jets[J]. Experimental Thermal & Fluid Science,1998,17(1/2):71-78.
[5] FLEISCHER A S,KRAMER K,GOLDSTEIN R J. Dynamics of the vortex structure of a jet impinging on a convex surface[J]. Experimental Thermal & Fluid Science,2001,24(3/4):169-175.
[6] CORNARO C,FLEISCHER A S,GOLDSTEIN R J. Flow visualization of a round jet impinging on cylindrical surfaces[J]. Experimental Thermal & Fluid Science,1999,20(2):66-78.
[7] 毛军逵,缪国君,刘震雄. 受限空间内斜向冲击凹柱面流场结构试验[J]. 航空动力学报,2010,25(1):11-17. MAO Junkui,MIU Guojun,LIU Zhenxiong. Experimental study of the flow structures of the concave surface with inclined impingement in limited space[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2010,25(1):11-17.
[8] 缪国君. 狭小受限曲面空间内冲击流动与换热特性研究[D]. 南京:南京航空航天大学,2007. MIU Guojun. Investigations of flow characteristics and heat transfer of impingement on curved surfaces in a limited narrow space[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2007.
[9] 沈瑾,缪国君,毛军逵,等. 小冲击间距下带倾角冲击凹柱面流场结构实验研究[J]. 推进技术,2010,31(2):187-192. SHEN Ji,MIU Guojun,MAO Junkui,et al. Experimental,investigations for the flow structures on the concave surface with inclined impingement in small distance[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology,2010,31(2):187-192.
[10] LEE D H,CHUNG Y S,KIM D S. Turbulent flow and heat transfer measurements on a curved surface with a fully developed round impinging jet[J]. International Journal of Heat & Fluid Flow,1997,18(1):160-169.
[11] LEE D H,CHUNG Y S,KIM M G. Technical note turbulent heat transfer from a convex hemispherical surface to a round impinging jet[J]. International Journal of Heat & Mass Transfer,1999,42(6):1147-1156.
[12] CORNARO C,FLEISCHER A S,ROUNDS M,et al. Jet impingement cooling of a convex semi-cylindrical surface[J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences,2001,40(10):890-898.
[13] LEE C H,LIM K B,LEE S H,et al. A study of the heat transfer characteristics of turbulent round jet impinging on an inclined concave surface using liquid crystal transient method[J]. Experimental Thermal & Fluid Science,2007,31(6):559-565.
[14] MASON-SMITH N,EDGINGTON-MITCHELL D,BUCHMANN N A,et al. Shock structures and instabilities formed in an underexpanded jet impinging on to cylindrical sections[J]. Shock Waves,2015,25(6):1-12.
[15] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会. 压力容器第3部分:设计:GB/T 150.3-2011[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2012. General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China,Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Pressure vessels-Part 3:Design:GB/T 150.3-2011[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China,2012.
[16] 平艳. 冲击射流数值模拟中湍流模型的分析与对比[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2012. PING Yan. Analysis and comparison of turbulence model in simulation of impinging jet flow[D]. Tianjin:Tianjin uUniversity,2012.
[17] BELTAOS S,RAJARATNAM N. Impingement of axisymmetric developing jets[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research,1977,15(4):311-326.
[18] BELTAOS S,RAJARATNAM N. Impinging circular turbulent jets[J]. Journal of the Hydraulics Division,1974,100(10):1313-1328
[19] GIRALT F,CHIA C J,TRASS O. Characterization of the impingement region in an axisymmetric turbulent jet[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals,1977,16(1):21-28.
[20] BELTAOS S,RAJARATNAM N. Plane turbulent impinging jets[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research,1973,11(1):29-59.

挡板的相对曲率对分离器入口局域流场流体力学性能的影响

Effect of inlet baffle curvature ratio on the local flow fields in a separator

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	郭强, 赵文凯, 肖永厚. 增强流体扰动强化变压吸附甲硫醚/氮气分离的数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 64-72.
[2]	邵博识, 谭宏博. 锯齿波纹板对挥发性有机物低温脱除过程强化模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 84-93.
[3]	王太, 苏硕, 李晟瑞, 马小龙, 刘春涛. 交流电场中贴壁气泡的动力学行为[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 133-141.
[4]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[5]	刘炫麟, 王驿凯, 戴苏洲, 殷勇高. 热泵中氨基甲酸铵分解反应特性及反应器结构优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4522-4530.
[6]	赵曦, 马浩然, 李平, 黄爱玲. 错位碰撞型微混合器混合性能的模拟分析与优化设计[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4559-4572.
[7]	叶振东, 刘涵, 吕静, 张亚宁, 刘洪芝. 基于钙镁二元盐的热化学储能反应器的性能优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4307-4314.
[8]	俞俊楠, 俞建峰, 程洋, 齐一搏, 化春键, 蒋毅. 基于深度学习的变宽度浓度梯度芯片性能预测[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3383-3393.
[9]	单雪影, 张濛, 张家傅, 李玲玉, 宋艳, 李锦春. 阻燃型环氧树脂的燃烧数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3413-3419.
[10]	王硕, 张亚新, 朱博韬. 基于灰色预测模型的水煤浆输送管道冲蚀磨损寿命预测[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3431-3442.
[11]	周龙大, 赵立新, 徐保蕊, 张爽, 刘琳. 电场-旋流耦合强化多相介质分离研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3443-3456.
[12]	陆诗建, 刘苗苗, 杨菲, 张俊杰, 陈思铭, 刘玲, 康国俊, 李清方. 改良型CO₂湿壁塔内气液两相流动规律及传质特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3457-3467.
[13]	卢兴福, 戴波, 杨世亮. 转鼓内圆柱形颗粒混合的超二次曲面离散单元法模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2252-2261.
[14]	张晨宇, 王宁, 徐洪涛, 罗祝清. 纳米颗粒强化传热的多级潜热储热器性能评价[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2332-2342.
[15]	马润梅, 杨海超, 李正大, 李双喜, 赵祥, 章国庆. 表面强化镀层对高速轴承腔密封端面变形及摩擦磨损影响分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1688-1697.