A review on the pressure-driven thin film composite (TFC) membranes with special stability for desalination

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-1133

Abstract

Abstract:

The thin film composite (TFC) membranes with excellent permeability and selectivity are commonly used for desalination in water treatment. To overcome the membrane performance deterioration because of drying, acid/base hydrolysis, high temperature damage and chlorine oxidation attack during the storage/operating process, numerous works focusing on stability improvement of TFC membranes have been reported. Referring to the most popular nanofiltration/reverse osmosis membranes, this review concluded the damage mechanism of polyamide TFC membranes in the drying process, acid/alkali solution, high temperature and active chlorine solution, and then the strategy of corresponding stability improvement is summarized. By systematically combing the latest research progress of four kinds of "special stable" TFC desalting membranes, i.e., dry resistance, acid/alkali resistance, high temperature resistance and chlorine resistance, it is pointed out that the current research work had problems such as lack of in-depth research on the mechanism of destruction and insufficient attention to the influence between different stabilities. Finally, the research direction in the future is prospected. While further studying the failure mechanism of membrane materials, it should pay more attention to the desalination efficiency and anti-fouling capacity of TFC desalination membranes with special stability, and explore multi-stability TFC desalination membranes, so as to provide reference for future related research work.

Key words: membrane, thin film composite (TFC) membrane, stability, desalination, acid/alkali-resistant, chlorine-resistant, thermally stability, anti-drying

摘要：

薄膜复合（TFC）膜凭借其优异的渗透性及选择性常用于水处理过程中的脱盐环节。为解决TFC脱盐膜在贮存/运行过程中因干燥、酸/碱水解、高温破坏或氯氧化导致性能下降的问题，国内外众多学者相继开展了各类提高其稳定性的研究。本文以广泛应用的TFC纳滤/反渗透膜为参照，论述了TFC脱盐膜在上述四种特殊条件下的破坏机制，并归纳了相关的稳定性提升策略。通过系统地梳理耐干、耐酸/碱、耐高温和耐氯四类“特殊稳定型”TFC脱盐膜的最新研究进展，指出了目前存在破坏机制研究工作不够深入、对不同稳定性之间的影响关注不足等问题。最后，展望了未来在进一步研究膜材料失效机制的同时，要兼顾“特殊稳定型”TFC脱盐膜的脱盐效能和耐污染能力，并开展对多重稳定性的TFC脱盐膜材料的探索, 以期为日后的相关研究工作提供参考。

关键词: 膜, 薄膜复合（TFC）膜, 稳定性, 脱盐, 耐酸碱, 耐氯, 耐高温, 耐干

CLC Number:

TQ028

ZONG Yue, ZHANG Ruijun, GAO Shanshan, TIAN Jiayu. A review on the pressure-driven thin film composite (TFC) membranes with special stability for desalination[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(4): 2058-2067.

宗悦, 张瑞君, 高珊珊, 田家宇. “特殊稳定型”压力驱动薄膜复合（TFC）脱盐膜的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 2058-2067.

Figures/Tables 5

References 72

1	冯向东, 封立林, 沈叔云, 等. 某燃煤发电厂反渗透膜系统脱盐率下降案例分析[J]. 水处理技术, 2022, 48(5): 141-144.
	FENG Xiangdong, FENG Lilin, SHEN Shuyun, et al. A case study on the decline of the desalination rate in the reverse osmosis membrane system of a coal-fired power plant[J]. Technology of Water Treatment, 2022, 48(5): 141-144.
2	倪亭亭, 王云钟, 吴永明, 等. 电厂反渗透浓水回用工程实例[J]. 工业水处理, 2022, 42(3): 182-185.
	NI Tingting, WANG Yunzhong, WU Yongming, et al. Project case of reverse osmosis concentrated water reuse in power plant[J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2022, 42(3): 182-185.
3	TIAN Jiayu, ZHAO Xingrui, GAO Shanshan, et al. Progress in research and application of nanofiltration (NF) technology for brackish water treatment[J]. Membranes, 2021, 11(9): 662.
4	LÓPEZ J, REIG M, VECINO X, et al. Comparison of acid-resistant ceramic and polymeric nanofiltration membranes for acid mine waters treatment[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 382: 122786.
5	DALVI Vaibhav, TANG Yupan, STAUDT Claudia, et al. Influential effects of nanoparticles, solvent and surfactant treatments on thin film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes for seawater desalination[J]. Desalination, 2017, 420: 216-225.
6	张翔, 王继文, 赵相山, 等. 国产纳滤膜用于苦咸水脱盐制备饮用水[J]. 膜科学与技术, 2020, 40(4): 87-91.
	ZHANG Xiang, WANG Jiwen, ZHAO Xiangshan, et al. Study on desalination of high salinity brackish water for drinking water production with a domestic nanofiltration membrane[J]. Membrane Science and Technology, 2020, 40(4): 87-91.
7	郭世伟, 郑力玮, 罗建泉, 等. 纳滤膜在高盐废水处理中的应用研究进展[J]. 膜科学与技术, 2022, 42(2): 175-182.
	GUO Shiwei, ZHENG Liwei, LUO Jianquan, et al. Application progress of nanofiltration membrane in treatment of high salinity wastewater[J]. Membrane Science and Technology, 2022, 42(2): 175-182
8	翟建文, 罗敏, 王东, 等. 耐高温膜用于凝结水深度净化处理[J]. 化工进展, 2009, 28(S2): 69-71.
	ZHAI Jianwen, LUO Min, WANG Dong, et al. Thermostable membrane for deeply-purification of condensation water[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2009, 28(S2): 69-71.
9	陈宇昊, 刘家辉, 刘娟, 等. 新型复合纳滤膜研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(5): 2665-2675.
	CHEN Yuhao, LIU Jiahui, LIU Juan, et al. Research progress of novel composite nanofiltration membrane[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(5): 2665-2675.
10	张赛晖, 李校阳, 高慧, 等. 制备聚酰胺复合膜中界面聚合反应添加剂的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(9): 4884-4894.
	ZHANG Saihui, LI Xiaoyang, GAO Hui, et al. Recent progress in additives in interfacial polymerization for the preparation of polyamide composite membrane[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(9): 4884-4894.
11	KARAMI P, KHORSHIDI B, SOARES J B, et al. Fabrication of highly permeable and thermally stable reverse osmosis thin film composite polyamide membranes[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2020, 12(2): 2916-2925.
12	Dupont, FilmTec™ reverse osmosis membranes technical manual[EB/OL]. 2022. .
13	ZONG Yue, ZHANG Ruijun, GAO Shanshan, et al. Anti-drying nanofiltration (NF) membranes constructed on PTFE microfiltration (MF) substrate via novel interfacial polymerization[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2021, 638: 119721.
14	LOUIE J S, PINNAU I, REINHARD M. Effects of surface coating process conditions on the water permeation and salt rejection properties of composite polyamide reverse osmosis membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, 367(1/2): 249-255.
15	ZVERINA L, KOCH M, ANDERSEN M F, et al. Controlled pore collapse to increase solute rejection of modified PES membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2020, 595: 117515.
16	KUEHNE M A, SONG R Q, LI N N, et al. Flux enhancement in TFC RO membranes[J]. Environmental Progress, 2001, 20(1): 23-26.
17	LI Hongbin, WANG Wei, ZHANG Yufeng. Preparation and characterization of high-selectivity hollow fiber composite nanofiltration membrane by two-way coating technique[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2014, 131(23): 41187.
18	GAO J, CHUNG T S. Influence of contaminants in glycerol/water mixtures during post-treatment on physicochemical properties and separation performance of air-dried membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 572: 223-229.
19	XIAO H F, CHU C H, XU W T, et al. Amphibian-inspired amino acid ionic liquid functionalized nanofiltration membranes with high water permeability and ion selectivity for pigment wastewater treatment[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 586: 44-52.
20	Dupont, DuPont water solutions launches breakthrough dry-tested seawater reverse osmosis elements[EB/OL]. 2022. .
21	Apisara BOONYA-ATICHART, BOONTANON Suwanna Kitpati, BOONTANON Narin. Removal of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in groundwater by nanofiltration membrane[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2016, 74(11): 2627-2633.
22	JUN B M, KIM S H, KWAK S K, et al. Effect of acidic aqueous solution on chemical and physical properties of polyamide NF membranes[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2018, 444: 387-398.
23	LI Juan, ZHAO Liming, WANG Yaosong, et al. Analysis of membrane fouling by proteins during nanofiltration of chitin alkali wastewater[J]. Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination, 2014, 4(4): 253-262.
24	SIEW Y W, ZEDDA K L, VELIZAROV S. Nanofiltration of simulated acid mine drainage: Effect of pH and membrane charge[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(1): 400.
25	DAEMS Nick, MILIS Sam, VERBEKE Rhea, et al. High-performance membranes with full pH-stability[J]. RSC Advances, 2018, 8(16): 8813-8827.
26	HOSEINPOUR Hamzeh, PEYRAVI Majid, NOZAD Ahmad, et al. Static and dynamic assessments of polysulfonamide and poly(amide-sulfonamide) acid-stable membranes[J]. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2016, 67: 453-466.
27	ZHU Ye, DOU Pengjia, HE Hailong, et al. Improvement of permeability and rejection of an acid resistant polysulfonamide thin-film composite nanofiltration membrane by a sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) interlayer[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 239: 116528.
28	HE Meng, YUAN Tao, DONG Wenjing, et al. High-performance acid-stable polysulfonamide thin-film composite membrane prepared via spinning-assist multilayer interfacial polymerization[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2019, 54(1): 886-900.
29	CAO Yang, LUO Jianquan, CHEN Chulong, et al. Highly permeable acid-resistant nanofiltration membrane based on a novel sulfonamide aqueous monomer for efficient acidic wastewater treatment[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 425: 131791.
30	PARK Hee M, TAKABA H, LEE Y T. Preparation and characterization of TFC NF membrane with improved acid resistance behavior[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2020, 616: 118620.
31	LEE K P, ZHENG J, BARGEMAN Gerrald, et al. pH stable thin film composite polyamine nanofiltration membranes by interfacial polymerisation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 478: 75-84.
32	ZENG Yanjun, WANG Lihong, ZHANG Lin, et al. An acid resistant nanofiltration membrane prepared from a precursor of poly(s-triazine-amine) by interfacial polymerization[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 546: 225-233.
33	ZHANG Yang, WAN Ying, LI Yu, et al. Thin-film composite nanofiltration membrane based on polyurea for extreme pH condition[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2021, 635: 119472.
34	PARK H M, ISMAEL M, TAKABA H, et al. Acid-resistant thin-film composite nanofiltration membrane prepared from polyamide-polyurea and the behavior of density functional theory study[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2022, 645: 120175.
35	ZOU Dong, CHEN Xianfu, QIU Minghui, et al. Flux-enhanced α‍-alumina tight ultrafiltration membranes for effective treatment of dye/salt wastewater at high temperatures[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 215: 143-154.
36	Meltem AĞTAŞ, Özgün YıLMAZ, DILAVER Mehmet, et al. Hot water recovery and reuse in textile sector with pilot scale ceramic ultrafiltration/nanofiltration membrane system[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 256: 120359.
37	KURT E, KOSEOGLU-IMER D Y, DIZGE N, et al. Pilot-scale evaluation of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for process reuse of segregated textile dyewash wastewater[J]. Desalination, 2012, 302: 24-32.
38	KARAMI Pooria, KHORSHIDI Behnam, MCGREGOR Mick, et al. Thermally stable thin film composite polymeric membranes for water treatment: A review[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 250: 119447.
39	AMAR N BEN, SAIDANI H, DERATANI A, et al. Effect of temperature on the transport of water and neutral solutes across nanofiltration membranes[J]. Langmuir, 2007, 23(6): 2937-2952.
40	WEN Peng, CHEN Yingbo, HU Xiaoyu, et al. Polyamide thin film composite nanofiltration membrane modified with acyl chlorided graphene oxide[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 535: 208-220.
41	WEI Ju, JIAN Xigao, WU Chunri, et al. Influence of polymer structure on thermal stability of composite membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2005, 256(1/2): 116-121.
42	CHEN Mingxing, XIAO Changfa, WANG Chun, et al. Preparation and characterization of a novel thermally stable thin film composite nanofiltration membrane with poly (m-phenyleneisophthalamide) (PMIA) substrate[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 550: 36-44.
43	ZHANG Shouhai, LIU Peng, CHEN Yuning, et al. Preparation of thermally stable composite forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes based on copoly(phthalazinone biphenyl ether sulfone) substrates[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2017, 166: 91-100.
44	WU Chunrui, ZHANG Shouhai, YANG Daling, et al. Preparation, characterization and application of a novel thermal stable composite nanofiltration membrane[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2009, 326(2): 429-434.
45	HU Lijie, ZHANG Shouhai, HAN Runlin, et al. Preparation and performance of novel thermally stable polyamide/PPENK composite nanofiltration membranes[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2012, 258(22): 9047-9053.
46	HAN Runlin, ZHANG Shouhai, HU Lijie, et al. Preparation and characterization of thermally stable poly(piperazine amide)/PPBES composite nanofiltration membrane[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, 370(1/2): 91-96.
47	YAO Yujian, ZHANG Xuan. Chlorine resistant reverse osmosis membrane: A call for reform of desalination treatment processes [J]. Desalination, 2021, 501: 114907.
48	STOLOV Mikhail, FREGER Viatcheslav. Degradation of polyamide membranes exposed to chlorine: An impedance spectroscopy study[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(5): 2618-2625.
49	YAO Yujian, ZHANG Wen, DU Yexin, et al. Toward enhancing the chlorine resistance of reverse osmosis membranes: An effective strategy via an end-capping technology[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(3): 1296-1304.
50	ASEMPOUR F, AKBARI S, KANANI-JAZI M H, et al. Chlorine-resistant TFN RO membranes containing modified poly(amidoamine) dendrimer-functionalized halloysite nanotubes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2021, 623: 119039.
51	CHARCOSSET Catherine. Classical and recent developments of membrane processes for desalination and natural water treatment[J]. Membranes, 2022, 12(3): 267.
52	CHO Kyungjin, JEONG Seongpil, KIM Heesun, et al. Simultaneous dechlorination and disinfection using vacuum UV irradiation for SWRO process[J]. Desalination, 2016, 398: 22-29.
53	KAVITHA J, RAJALAKSHMI M, PHANI A R, et al. Pretreatment processes for seawater reverse osmosis desalination systems—A review[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2019, 32: 100926.
54	ZHAN Shuo, LI Saisai, ZHAN Xia, et al. Green lignin-based polyester nanofiltration membranes with ethanol and chlorine resistance[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2022, 139(1): 51427.
55	SUN Haixiang, CHEN Yuhao, LIU Jiahui, et al. A novel chlorine-resistant polyacrylate nanofiltration membrane constructed from oligomeric phenolic resin[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2021, 262: 118300.
56	FENG Xiaoquan, LIU Decheng, YE Hu, et al. High-flux polyamide membrane with improved chlorine resistance for efficient dye/salt separation based on a new N-rich amine monomer[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2021, 278: 119533.
57	LIU Yi, LIN Bo, LIU Wenchao, et al. Preparation and characterization of a novel nanofiltration membrane with chlorine-tolerant property and good separation performance[J]. RSC Advances, 2018, 8(64): 36430-36440.
58	MATSHETSHE Kabo, SIKHWIVHILU Keneiloe, NDLOVU Gebhu, et al. Antifouling and antibacterial β‍-cyclodextrin decorated graphene oxide/polyamide thin-film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membranes for desalination applications[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2021, 278: 119594.
59	XUE Jing, SHEN Jianliang, ZHANG Runnan, et al. High-flux nanofiltration membranes prepared with β-cyclodextrin and graphene quantum dots[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2020, 612: 118465.
60	SHUKLA A K, ALAM J, ALHOSHAN M S, et al. Thin-film nanocomposite membrane incorporated with porous Zn-based metal-organic frameworks: Toward enhancement of desalination performance and chlorine resistance[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2021, 13(24): 28818-28831.
61	LIU Sihua, WU Chunrui, HOU Xiaotong, et al. Understanding the chlorination mechanism and the chlorine-induced separation performance evolution of polypiperazine-amide nanofiltration membrane[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 573: 36-45.
62	ZHANG Jinmiao, LI Shuxuan, REN Dechao, et al. Fabrication of ultra-smooth thin-film composite nanofiltration membrane with enhanced selectivity and permeability on interlayer of hybrid polyvinyl alcohol and graphene oxide [J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2021, 268: 118649.
63	JIANG Yongxiang, LI Shuxuan, SU Jinghua, et al. Two dimensional COFs as ultra-thin interlayer to build TFN hollow fiber nanofiltration membrane for desalination and heavy metal wastewater treatment[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2021, 635: 119523.
64	CHENG Jun, SHI Wenxin, ZHANG Lanhe, et al. A novel polyester composite nanofiltration membrane formed by interfacial polymerization of pentaerythritol (PE) and trimesoyl chloride (TMC)[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2017, 416: 152-159.
65	SHEN Jianliang, WANG Guangzhe, YOU Xinda, et al. Thermal-facilitated interfacial polymerization toward high-performance polyester desalination membrane[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2021, 9(13): 8470-8479.
66	SHARABATI J A D, ERKOC-ILTER S, GUCLU S, et al. Zwitterionic polysiloxane-polyamide hybrid active layer for high performance and chlorine resistant TFC desalination membranes[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2022, 282: 119965.
67	YAO Yujian, ZHANG Pingxia, JIANG Chao, et al. High performance polyester reverse osmosis desalination membrane with chlorine resistance[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2021, 4(2): 138-146.
68	WANG J T, LI S L, GUAN Y X, et al. Novel RO membranes fabricated by grafting sulfonamide group: Improving water permeability, fouling resistance and chlorine resistant performance[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2022, 641: 119919.
69	WANG Jing, ZHANG Si, WU Pengfei, et al. In situ surface modification of thin-film composite polyamide membrane with zwitterions for enhanced chlorine resistance and transport properties[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(12): 12043-12052.
70	VATANPOUR Vahid, SANADGOL Atefeh. Surface modification of reverse osmosis membranes by grafting of polyamidoamine dendrimer containing graphene oxide nanosheets for desalination improvement[J]. Desalination, 2020, 491: 114442.
71	LU Peng, LI Wenjun, YANG Sheng, et al. Layered double hydroxide-modified thin-film composite membranes with remarkably enhanced chlorine resistance and anti-fouling capacity[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 220: 231-237.
72	XIE Yingqi, YANG Linyan, CHEN Xueming, et al. The role of iron present in water environment in degradation of polyamide membranes by free chlorine[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2022, 651: 120458.

基膜	分离层	膜性能变化	参考文献
PPESK	MPD-TMC	测试温度由20℃升至90℃，纯水通量提升200%， Na₂SO₄截留率由96.8%降至93.2%	[41]
PPESK	PIP-TMC	测试温度由20℃升至90℃，纯水通量提升200%， Na₂SO₄截留率保持在97.7%±0.4%	[41]
PMIA	PIP-TMC	测试温度由25℃升至90℃，纯水通量提升约120%， Na₂SO₄截留性能不变（高于95%）	[43]
PPEA	PIP-TMC	测试温度由25℃升至85℃，纯水通量提升200%， NaCl截留率由12.2%降至6.9%，染料ACBK截留率保持不变（99.5%±0.2%）	[44]
PPENK	PIP-TMC	测试温度由20℃升至80℃，纯水通量提升400%， Na₂SO₄截留性能不变（95.1%）	[45]
PPBES	PIP-TMC	测试温度由18℃升至85℃，纯水通量提升375%， Na₂SO₄截留率由92.0%降至88.5%	[46]

基膜	分离层	膜性能变化	参考文献
PPESK	MPD-TMC	测试温度由20℃升至90℃，纯水通量提升200%， Na₂SO₄截留率由96.8%降至93.2%	[41]
PPESK	PIP-TMC	测试温度由20℃升至90℃，纯水通量提升200%， Na₂SO₄截留率保持在97.7%±0.4%	[41]
PMIA	PIP-TMC	测试温度由25℃升至90℃，纯水通量提升约120%， Na₂SO₄截留性能不变（高于95%）	[43]
PPEA	PIP-TMC	测试温度由25℃升至85℃，纯水通量提升200%， NaCl截留率由12.2%降至6.9%，染料ACBK截留率保持不变（99.5%±0.2%）	[44]
PPENK	PIP-TMC	测试温度由20℃升至80℃，纯水通量提升400%， Na₂SO₄截留性能不变（95.1%）	[45]
PPBES	PIP-TMC	测试温度由18℃升至85℃，纯水通量提升375%， Na₂SO₄截留率由92.0%降至88.5%	[46]

单体名称	原理	膜性能变化	参考文献
低聚酚醛树脂（OPR）	减少酰胺键数量	浸泡1000mg/L NaClO溶液48h，水通量从2.42L/(m²·h·bar)增加至3.54L/(m²·h·bar)，Na₂SO₄截留率降至92.0%	[55]
季戊四醇	减少酰胺键数量	浸泡3000mg/L NaClO溶液48h，水通量从1.34L/(m²·h·bar)增长至1.84L/(m²·h·bar)，Na₂SO₄截留率保持不变（约97%）	[64]
葡萄糖	减少酰胺键数量	浸泡10000mg/L NaClO溶液96h （pH=4.5），水通量从15.8L/(m²·h·bar)增加至42.3L/(m²·h·bar)，Na₂SO₄截留率从99.5%下降到91%	[65]
(3-磺丙基甜菜碱-丙基)- 三甲氧基硅（SPPT）	与水分子通过静电吸引形成水层	浸泡500mg/L NaClO溶液6h，NaCl截留率低于95%	[66]
3,5-二羟基苯甲酸（DHBA）	减少酰胺键数量	浸泡100000mg·h/L NaClO溶液（pH<7），NaCl截留率保持不变（约99%）	[67]
3,5-二氨基-1,2,4- 三氮唑（DAT）	降低酰胺键活性	浸泡200mg/L NaClO溶液120h，水通量95.1 L/(m²·h·bar)，直接红23截留率>90%	[56]
间苯二甲胺（m-XDA）	降低酰胺键活性，增加空间位阻	浸泡200mg/L NaClO溶液20h，水通量增加约100%，Na₂SO₄截留率大于90%	[57]

单体名称	原理	膜性能变化	参考文献
低聚酚醛树脂（OPR）	减少酰胺键数量	浸泡1000mg/L NaClO溶液48h，水通量从2.42L/(m²·h·bar)增加至3.54L/(m²·h·bar)，Na₂SO₄截留率降至92.0%	[55]
季戊四醇	减少酰胺键数量	浸泡3000mg/L NaClO溶液48h，水通量从1.34L/(m²·h·bar)增长至1.84L/(m²·h·bar)，Na₂SO₄截留率保持不变（约97%）	[64]
葡萄糖	减少酰胺键数量	浸泡10000mg/L NaClO溶液96h （pH=4.5），水通量从15.8L/(m²·h·bar)增加至42.3L/(m²·h·bar)，Na₂SO₄截留率从99.5%下降到91%	[65]
(3-磺丙基甜菜碱-丙基)- 三甲氧基硅（SPPT）	与水分子通过静电吸引形成水层	浸泡500mg/L NaClO溶液6h，NaCl截留率低于95%	[66]
3,5-二羟基苯甲酸（DHBA）	减少酰胺键数量	浸泡100000mg·h/L NaClO溶液（pH<7），NaCl截留率保持不变（约99%）	[67]
3,5-二氨基-1,2,4- 三氮唑（DAT）	降低酰胺键活性	浸泡200mg/L NaClO溶液120h，水通量95.1 L/(m²·h·bar)，直接红23截留率>90%	[56]
间苯二甲胺（m-XDA）	降低酰胺键活性，增加空间位阻	浸泡200mg/L NaClO溶液20h，水通量增加约100%，Na₂SO₄截留率大于90%	[57]

[1]	ZHANG Zuoqun, GAO Yang, BAI Chaojie, XUE Lixin. Thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) mixed matrix reverse osmosis (MMRO) membranes from secondary interface polymerization containing in situ grown ZIF-8 nano-particles [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 364-373.
[2]	XU Jie, XIA Longbo, LUO Ping, ZOU Dong, ZHONG Zhaoxiang. Progress in preparation and application of omniphobic membranes for membrane distillation process [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(8): 3943-3955.
[3]	PAN Yichang, ZHOU Rongfei, XING Weihong. Advanced microporous membranes for efficient separation of same-carbon-number hydrocarbon mixtures: State-of-the-art and challenges [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(8): 3926-3942.
[4]	WANG Baoying, WANG Huangying, YAN Junying, WANG Yaoming, XU Tongwen. Research progress of polymer inclusion membrane in metal separation and recovery [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(8): 3990-4004.
[5]	WANG Xin, WANG Bingbing, YANG Wei, XU Zhiming. Anti-scale and anti-corrosion properties of PDA/PTFE superhydrophobic coating on metal surface [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(8): 4315-4321.
[6]	LI Xuejia, LI Peng, LI Zhixia, JIN Dunshang, GUO Qiang, SONG Xufeng, SONG Peng, PENG Yuelian. Experimental comparation on anti-scaling and anti-wetting ability of hydrophilic and hydrophobic modified membranes [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(8): 4458-4464.
[7]	LU Yang, ZHOU Jinsong, ZHOU Qixin, WANG Tang, LIU Zhuang, LI Bohao, ZHOU Lingtao. Leaching mechanism of Hg-absorption products on CeO₂/TiO₂ sorbentsin syngas [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3875-3883.
[8]	WU Zhanhua, SHENG Min. Pitfalls of accelerating rate calorimeter for reactivity hazard evaluation and risk assessment [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3374-3382.
[9]	LU Shijian, LIU Miaomiao, YANG Fei, ZHANG Junjie, CHEN Siming, LIU Ling, KANG Guojun, LI Qingfang. Gas-liquid two-phase flow and mass transfer characteristics in an improved CO₂ wet-wall column [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3457-3467.
[10]	FENG Jianghan, SONG Fang. Research progress of anion exchange membrane water electrolysis cells [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3501-3509.
[11]	CHEN Xiangli, LI Qianqian, ZHANG Tian, LI Biao, LI Kangkang. Research progress on self-healing oil/water separation membranes [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3600-3610.
[12]	LI Jiyan, JING Yanju, XING Guoyu, LIU Meichen, LONG Yong, ZHU Zhaoqi. Research progress and challenges of salt-resistant solar-driven interface photo-thermal materials and evaporator [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3611-3622.
[13]	XIE Zhiwei, WU Zhangyong, ZHU Qichen, JIANG Jiajun, LIANG Tianxiang, LIU Zhenyang. Viscosity properties and magnetoviscous effects of Ni_0.5Zn_0.5Fe₂O₄ vegetable oil-based magnetic fluid [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3623-3633.
[14]	YANG Jingying, SHI Wansheng, HUANG Zhenxing, XIE Lijuan, ZHAO Mingxing, RUAN Wenquan. Research progress on the preparation of modified nano zero-valent iron materials [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(6): 2975-2986.
[15]	YANG Yang, SUN Zhigao, LI Cuimin, LI Juan, HUANG Haifeng. Promotion on the formation of HCFC-141b hydrate under static conditions by surfactant OP-13 [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(6): 2854-2859.