氨气深度脱除材料与技术研究进展

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-1612

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

氨气（NH₃）作为一种危害性碱性有毒气体，不仅危害环境，而且会对人体造成不可逆伤害。在电子信息、能源等行业，极微量的NH₃即可影响产品品质、降低过程性能。因此，NH₃的深度脱除在工业上具有重要的意义。本文综述了近年来NH₃深度脱除的工艺现状，分析了NH₃脱除材料如离子液体、低共熔溶剂、改性活性炭、分子筛、改性氧化铝、金属盐类、金属有机框架材料、多孔有机聚合物、共价有机骨架材料、氧化石墨烯、普鲁士蓝类似物对NH₃的分离性能。总结了深度脱除NH₃的工艺特点和脱氨材料的性能，浅析了该领域发展面临的问题，并对未来的发展方向提出了建议。

关键词: 氨气, 深度脱除, 吸收, 吸附, 分离

Abstract:

Ammonia gas (NH₃), as a harmful basic gas, not only pollutes the environment but also causes irreversible damages to human beings. In electronic information, energy, and other related industries, a trace amount of NH₃ can affect product quality and reduce process performance. Therefore, deep removal of NH₃ has important industrial significance. In this review, the status of deep removal of NH₃ is reviewed, and the separation performance of various materials, including ionic liquids, deep eutectic solvents, modified activated carbon, molecular sieves, modified alumina, metal salts, metal-organic frameworks, porous organic polymers, covalent organic frameworks, graphite oxide, and Prussian blue analogs are discussed. The technological characteristics for deep removal of NH₃ as well as the performance requirements for deamination materials are summarized. The challenges in this field are briefly analyzed with suggestions put forward for future development.

Key words: ammonia gas, deep removal, absorption, adsorption, separation

中图分类号:

TQ028

陈沛坤, 张袁斌, 崔希利, 邢华斌. 氨气深度脱除材料与技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(7): 3957-3975.

CHEN Peikun, ZHANG Yuanbin, CUI Xili, XING Huabin. Progress in materials and technologies for deep removal of ammonia gas[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(7): 3957-3975.

图/表 16

参考文献 124

1	KLERKE A, CHRISTENSEN C H, NФRSKOV J K, et al. Ammonia for hydrogen storage: challenges and opportunities[J].　Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2008, 18(20): 2304-2310.
2	KHAN N A, HASAN Z, JHUNG S H. Adsorptive removal of hazardous materials using metal-organic frameworks (MOFs): a review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2013, 244/245: 444-456.
3	HELMINEN J, HELENIUS J, PAATERO E, et al. Comparison of sorbents and isotherm models for NH₃-gas separation by adsorption[J]. AIChE Journal, 2000, 46(8): 1541-1555.
4	ZHOU Ying, CHENG Shuiyuan, LANG Jianlei, et al. A comprehensive ammonia emission inventory with high-resolution and its evaluation in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region, China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2015, 106: 305-317.
5	PAULOT Fabien, JACOB Daniel J. Hidden cost of U.S. agricultural exports: particulate matter from ammonia emissions[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(2): 903-908.
6	KATZ Michael J, HOWARTH Ashlee J, MOGHADAM Peyman Z, et al. High volumetric uptake of ammonia using Cu-MOF-74/Cu-CPO-27[J]. Dalton Transactions, 2016, 45(10): 4150-4153.
7	KATZ Michael J, RAMNIAL Taramatee, YU Huazhong, et al. Polymorphism of Zn[Au(CN)₂]₂ and its luminescent sensory response to NH₃ vapor[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2008, 130(32): 10662-10673.
8	BARIN Gokhan, PETERSON Gregory W, CROCELLA Valentina, et al. Highly effective ammonia removal in a series of Bronsted acidic porous polymers: investigation of chemical and structural variations[J]. Chemical Science, 2017, 8(6): 4399-4409.
9	蒋载阳, 江书忠, 曹霞, 等. 论猪舍中氨气的危害[J]. 中国猪业, 2018, 13(8): 58-60, 62.
	JIANG Zaiyang, JIANG Shuzhong, CAO Xia, et al. On the harm of ammonia gas in pigsty [J]. China Pig Industry, 2018, 13(8): 58-60, 62.
10	NUERNBERG G B, MOREIRA M A, ERNANI P R, et al. Efficiency of basalt zeolite and Cuban zeolite to adsorb ammonia released from poultry litter[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 183: 667-672.
11	HUANG R J, ZHANG Y L, BOZZETTI C, et al. High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China[J]. Nature, 2014, 514(7521): 218-222.
12	MACDONALD S A, HINSBERG W D, WENDT H R, et al. Airborne contamination of a chemically amplified resist. 1. Identification of problem[J]. Chemistry of Materials, 1993, 5(3): 348-356.
13	LIN I K, BAI H L, WU B J. Analysis of relationship between inorganic gases and fine particles in cleanroom environment[J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2010, 10(3): 245-254.
14	KITAJIMA H, SHIRAMIZU Y. Requirements for contamination control in the gigabit era[J]. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 1997, 10(2): 267-272.
15	YEH C F, HSIAO C W, LIN S J, et al. The removal of airborne molecular contamination in cleanroom using PTFE and chemical filters[J]. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 2004, 17(2): 214-220.
16	CHIEN C L, TSAI C J, KU K W, et al. Ventilation control of air pollutant during preventive maintenance of a metal etcher in semiconductor industry[J]. Aerosol Air Quality Research, 2007, 7(4): 469-488.
17	HASSEL B A VAN, KARRA J R, SANTANA J, et al. Ammonia sorbent development for on-board H₂ purification[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2015, 142: 215-226.
18	YUAN X Z, LI H, YU Y, et al. Diagnosis of contamination introduced by ammonia at the cathode in a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(17): 12464-12473.
19	DECOSTE Jared B, DENNY Michael S, PETERSON Gregory W JR, et al. Enhanced aging properties of HKUST-1 in hydrophobic mixed-matrix membranes for ammonia adsorption[J]. Chemical Science, 2016, 7(4): 2711-2716.
20	MAIA G D N, DAY G B, GATES R S, et al. Ammonia biofiltration and nitrous oxide generation during the start-up of gas-phase compost biofilters[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2012, 46: 659-664.
21	王佩琳, 王宗爽, 问立宁, 等. 《无机化学工业污染物排放标准》（GB 31573—2015）解读[J]. 环境影响评价, 2016, 38(5): 30-34.
	WANG Peilin, WANG Zongshuang, WEN Lining, et al. An interpretation of emission standards of pollutants for inorganic chemical industry (GB 31573—2015) [J]. Environmental Impact Assessment,2016,38(5):30-34.
22	BHOWN A, CUSSLER E L. Mechanism for selective ammonia transport through poly(vinylammonium thiocyanate) membranes[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1991, 113(3): 742-749.
23	TABE-MOHAMMADI A. A review of the applications of membrane separation technology in natural gas treatment[J]. Separation Science and Technology, 1999, 34(10): 2095-2111.
24	SOPYAN I. Kinetic analysis on photocatalytic degradation of gaseous acetaldehyde, ammonia and hydrogen sulfide on nanosized porous TiO₂ films[J]. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 2007, 8(1/2): 33-39.
25	TAKATA Tomoka, TSUNOJI Nao, TAKAMITSU Yasuyuki, et al. Incorporation of various heterometal atoms in CHA zeolites by hydrothermal conversion of FAU zeolite and their performance for selective catalytic reduction of NO_x with ammonia[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2017, 246: 89-101.
26	CHEN C Y, TSAI T H, CHANG C H, et al. Airlift bioreactor system for simultaneous removal of hydrogen sulfide and ammonia from synthetic and actual waste gases[J]. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A:Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, 2018, 53(8): 694-701.
27	PAGANS E, FONT X, SANCHEZ A. Biofiltration for ammonia removal from composting exhaust gases[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2005, 113(2/3): 105-110.
28	ASHTARI Ahmad Kalbasi, MAJD Amir M Samani, RISKOWSKI Gerald L, et al. Removing ammonia from air with a constant pH, slightly acidic water spray wet scrubber using recycled scrubbing solution[J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2016, 10(6): 1-10.
29	GUO Jing, JIAO Weizhou, QI Guisheng, et al. Applications of high-gravity technologies in gas purifications: a review[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2019, 27(6): 1361-1373.
30	VIKRANT K, KUMAR V, KIM K H, et al. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs): potential and challenges for capture and abatement of ammonia[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2017, 5(44): 22877-22896.
31	樊腾. 超重力法胶清脱氨及氨气回收技术基础研究[D].太原: 中北大学, 2019.
	FAN Teng. Basic research on super-gravity gel deamination and ammonia gas recovery technology[D]. Taiyuan: North University of China, 2019.
32	YOKOZEKI A, SHIFLETT M B. Vapor-liquid equilibria of ammonia plus ionic liquid mixtures[J]. Applied Energy, 2007, 84(12): 1258-1273.
33	YOKOZEKI A, SHIFLETT M B. Ammonia solubilities in room-temperature ionic liquids[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2007, 46(5): 1605-1610.
34	LI Guihua, ZHOU Qing, ZHANG Xiangping, et al. Solubilities of ammonia in basic imidazolium ionic liquids[J]. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2010, 297(1): 34-39.
35	YANG Lifeng, QIAN Siheng, WANG Xiaobing, et al. Energy-efficient separation alternatives: metal-organic frameworks and membranes for hydrocarbon separation[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2020, 49(15): 5359-5406.
36	LI Zhijie, ZHANG Xiangping, DONG Haifeng, et al. Efficient absorption of ammonia with hydroxyl-functionalized ionic liquids[J]. RSC Advances, 2015, 5(99): 81362-81370.
37	SHANG D W, BAI L, ZENG S J, et al. Enhanced NH₃ capture by imidazolium-based protic ionic liquids with different anions and cation substituents[J]. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 2018, 93(5): 1228-1236.
38	SHANG D W, ZHANG X P, ZENG S J, et al. Protic ionic liquid [Bim][NTf₂] with strong hydrogen bond donating ability for highly efficient ammonia absorption[J]. Green Chemistry, 2017, 19(4): 937-945.
39	YUAN Lei, ZHANG Xiangping, REN Baozeng, et al. Dual-functionalized protic ionic liquids for efficient absorption of NH₃ through synergistically physicochemical interaction[J]. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 2020, 95(6): 1815-1824.
40	LI Y H, ALI M C, YANG Q W, et al. Hybrid deep eutectic solvents with flexible hydrogen-bonded supramolecular networks for highly efficient uptake of NH₃[J]. ChemSusChem, 2017, 10(17): 3368-3377.
41	ZHONG F Y, PENG H L, TAO D J, et al. Phenol-based ternary deep eutectic solvents for highly efficient and reversible absorption of NH₃[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 3258-3266.
42	AKHMETSHINA A I, PETUKHOV A N, MECHERGUI A, et al. Evaluation of methanesulfonate-based deep eutectic solvent for ammonia sorption[J]. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, 2018, 63(6): 1896-1904.
43	ZHONG F Yu, ZHOU Linsen, SHEN Jian, et al. Rational design of azole-based deep eutectic solvents for highly efficient and reversible capture of ammonia[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2019, 7(16): 14170-14179.
44	JIANG W J, ZHONG F Y, LIU Y, et al. Effective and reversible capture of NH₃ by ethylamine hydrochloride plus glycerol deep eutectic solvents[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2019, 7(12): 10552-10560.
45	DENG Dongshun, GAO Bao, ZHANG Chao, et al. Investigation of protic NH₄SCN-based deep eutectic solvents as highly efficient and reversible NH₃ absorbents[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 358: 936-943.
46	AKI S, MELLEIN B R, SAURER E M, et al. High-pressure phase behavior of carbon dioxide with imidazolium-based ionic liquids[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2004, 108(52): 20355-20365.
47	SHI W, MAGINN E J. Molecular simulation of ammonia absorption in the ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (emim Tf₂N)[J]. AIChE Journal, 2009, 55(9): 2414-2421.
48	BEDIA Jorge, PALOMAR Jose, Maria GONZALEZ-MIQUEL, et al. Screening ionic liquids as suitable ammonia absorbents on the basis of thermodynamic and kinetic analysis[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2012, 95: 188-195.
49	PALOMAR Jose, Maria GONZALEZ-MIQUEL, BEDIA Jorge, et al. Task-specific ionic liquids for efficient ammonia absorption[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2011, 82: 43-52.
50	ZENG S J, LIU L, SHANG D W, et al. Efficient and reversible absorption of ammonia by cobalt ionic liquids through Lewis acid-base and cooperative hydrogen bond interactions[J]. Green Chemistry, 2018, 20(9): 2075-2083.
51	PAIVA Alexandre, CRAVEIRO Rita, AROSO Ivo, et al. Natural deep eutectic solvents-solvents for the 21st century[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2014, 2(5): 1063-1071.
52	CHEN K J, SCOTT H S, MADDEN D G, et al. Benchmark C₂H₂/CO₂ and CO₂/C₂H₂ separation by two closely related hybrid ultramicroporous materials[J]. Chem., 2016, 1(5): 753-765.
53	OU J Z, GE Wanyin y, CAREY B, et al. Physisorption-based charge transfer in two-dimensional SnS₂ for selective and reversible NO₂ gas sensing[J]. ACS Nano, 2015, 9(10): 10313-10323.
54	WANG Xiaoxing, MA Xiaoliang, ZHAO Shuqi, et al. Nanoporous molecular basket sorbent for NO₂ and SO₂ capture based on a polyethylene glycol-loaded mesoporous molecular sieve[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2009, 2(8): 878-882.
55	YANG Cuiting, MIAO Guang, PI Yunhong, et al. Abatement of various types of VOCs by adsorption/catalytic oxidation: a review[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 370: 1128-1153.
56	YANG Ralpht. Gas separation by adsorption processes[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1988, 43(4): 985.
57	VOHRA M. Treatment of gaseous ammonia emissions using date palm pits based granular activated carbon[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(5): 14.
58	HUANG C C, LI H S, CHEN C H. Effect of surface acidic oxides of activated carbon on adsorption of ammonia[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 159(2-3): 523-527.
59	TENG H S, YEH T S, HSU L Y. Preparation of activated carbon from bituminous coal with phosphoric acid activation[J]. Carbon, 1998, 36(9): 1387-1395.
60	MOCHIZUKI Takuya, KUBOTA Mitsuhiro, MATSUDA Hitoki, et al. Adsorption behaviors of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide on activated carbon prepared from petroleum coke by KOH chemical activation[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2016, 144: 164-169.
61	FORTIER H, WESTREICH P, SELIG S, et al. Ammonia, cyclohexane, nitrogen and water adsorption capacities of an activated carbon impregnated with increasing amounts of ZnCl₂, and designed to chemisorb gaseous NH₃ from an air stream[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2008, 320(2): 423-435.
62	WANG J T, JIANG W Y, ZHANG Z X, et al. Mesoporous carbon beads impregnated with transition metal chlorides for regenerative removal of ammonia in the atmosphere[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2017, 56(12): 3283-3290.
63	PETIT Camille, KARWACKI Christopher, PETERSON Greg, et al. Interactions of ammonia with the surface of microporous carbon impregnated with transition metal chlorides[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2007, 111(34): 12705-12714.
64	PARK S J, JIN S Y. Effect of ozone treatment on ammonia removal of activated carbons[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2005, 286(1): 417-419.
65	KIM B J, PARK S J. Effects of carbonyl group formation on ammonia adsorption of porous carbon surfaces[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2007, 311(1): 311-314.
66	LEPINASSE E, SPINNER B. Production de froid par couplage de réacteurs solide-gaz I: Analyse des performances de tels systèmes[J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 1994, 17(5): 309-322.
67	MOCHIDA I, KORAI Y, SHIRAHAMA M, et al. Removal of SO_x and NO_x over activated carbon fibers[J]. Carbon, 2000, 38(2): 227-239.
68	PARK S J, KIM B J. Ammonia removal of activated carbon fibers produced by oxyfluorination[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2005, 291(2): 597-599.
69	ZHENG W H, HU J T, RAPPEPORT S, et al. Activated carbon fiber composites for gas phase ammonia adsorption[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2016, 234: 146-154.
70	SAMADDAR P, SON Y S, TSANG D C W, et al. Progress in graphene-based materials as superior media for sensing, sorption, and separation of gaseous pollutants[J]. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 2018, 368: 93-114.
71	SEREDYCH M, BANDOSZ T J. Adsorption of ammonia on graphite oxide/aluminium polycation and graphite oxide/zirconium-aluminium polyoxycation composites[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2008, 324(1-2): 25-35.
72	LI Yunguo, PATHAK Biswarup, NISAR Jawad, et al. Metal-decorated graphene oxide for ammonia adsorption[J]. EPL, 2013, 103(2): 28007.
73	PETIT C, BANDOSZ T J. Graphite oxide/polyoxometalate nanocomposites as adsorbents of ammonia[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2009, 113(9): 3800-3809.
74	HELMINEN J, HELENIUS J, PAATERO E, et al. Adsorption equilibria of ammonia gas on inorganic and organic sorbents at 298.15K[J]. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, 2001, 46(2): 391-399.
75	MATITO-MARTOS I, MARTIN-CALVO A, ANIA C O, et al. Role of hydrogen bonding in the capture and storage of ammonia in zeolites[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 387:124062.
76	SAHA Dipendu, DENG Shuguang. Characteristics of ammonia adsorption on activated alumina[J]. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, 2010, 55(12): 5587-5593.
77	KIM J, LEE H, VO H T, et al. Bead-shaped mesoporous alumina adsorbents for adsorption of ammonia[J]. Materials, 2020, 13(6): 13.
78	LIU C Y, AIKA K. Absorption and desorption behavior of ammonia with alkali earth halide and mixed halide[J]. Chemistry Letters, 2002, (8): 798-799.
79	HUBERTY Mark S, WAGNER Andrew L, MCCORMICK Alon, et al. Ammonia absorption at haber process conditions[J]. AIChE Journal, 2012, 58(11): 3526-3532.
80	MALMALI Mandi, LE Giang, HENDRICKSON Jennifer, et al. Better absorbents for ammonia separation[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2018, 6(5): 6536-6546.
81	WESTMAN S, WERNER P E, SCHULER T, et al. X-ray investigations of ammines of alkaline earth metal halides. I. the structures of CaCl₂(NH₃)₈, CaCl₂(NH₃)₂ and the decomposition product CaClOH[J]. Acta Chemica Scandinavica Series A:Physical and Inorganic Chemistry, 1981, 35(7): 467-472.
82	JIANG Yong, TAKAHASHI Akira, KAWAMOTO Tohru, et al. High performance sorption and desorption behaviours at high working temperatures of ammonia gas in a cobalt-substituted prussian blue analogue[J]. Chemical Communications, 2018, 54(84): 11961-11964.
83	JIANG Yong, TAKAHASHI Akira, KAWAMOTO Tohru, et al. Unique adsorption and desorption behaviour of ammonia gas at heating temperature using the Prussian blue analogue Zn₃[Co(CN)₆]₂[J]. Inorganica Chimica Acta, 2020, 501: 119273.
84	TAKAHASHI Akira, MINAMI Kimitaka, NODA Keiko, et al. Trace ammonia removal from air by selective adsorbents reusable with water[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2020, 12(13): 15115-15119.
85	REZAEI E, SCHLAGETER B, NEMATI M, et al. Evaluation of metal oxide nanoparticles for adsorption of gas phase ammonia[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2017, 5(1): 422-431.
86	崔希利, 邢华斌. 金属有机框架材料分离低碳烃的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(6): 2339-2352.
	CUI Xili, XING Huabin. Separation of light hydrocarbons with metal-organic frameworks [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering, 2018, 69(6): 2339-2352.
87	PETERSON G W, WAGNER G W, BALBOA A, et al. Ammonia vapor removal by Cu₃(BTC)₂and its characterization by MAS NMR[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2009, 113(31): 13906-13917.
88	CHUI S S Y, LO S M F, CHARMANT J P H, et al. A chemically functionalizable nanoporous material [Cu₃(TMA)₂(H₂O)₃]_n[J]. Science, 1999, 283(5405): 1148-1150.
89	Grant GLOVER T, PETERSON Gregory W, SCHINDLER Bryan J, et al. MOF-74 building unit has a direct impact on toxic gas adsorption[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66(2): 163-170.
90	SPANOPOULOS Ioannis, XYDIAS Pantelis, MALLIAKAS Christos D, et al. A straight forward route for the development of metal-organic frameworks functionalized with aromatic -OH groups: synthesis, characterization, and gas (N₂, Ar, H₂, CO₂, CH₄, NH₃) sorption properties[J]. Inorganic Chemistry, 2013, 52(2): 855-862.
91	JASUJA Himanshu, PETERSON Gregory W, DECOSTE Jared B, et al. Evaluation of MOFs for air purification and air quality control applications: ammonia removal from air[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2015, 124: 118-124.
92	RIETH Adam J, TULCHINSKY Yuri, DINCA Mircea. High and reversible ammonia uptake in mesoporous azolate metal organic frameworks with open Mn, Co, and Ni sites[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2016, 138(30): 9401-9404.
93	RIETH Adam J, DINCA Mircea. Controlled gas uptake in metal-organic frameworks with record ammonia sorption[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2018, 140(9): 3461-3466.
94	GODFREY Harry G W, SILVA Ivan DA, BRIGGS Lydia, et al. Ammonia storage by reversible host-guest site exchange in a robust metal-organic framework[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57(45): 14778-14781.
95	ZHANG Yuanyuan, ZHANG Xuan, CHEN Zhijie, et al. A flexible interpenetrated zirconium-based metal-organic framework with high affinity toward ammonia[J]. ChemSusChem, 2020, 13(7): 1710-1714.
96	CHEN Yang, DU Yadan, LIU Puxu, et al. Removal of ammonia emissions via reversible structural transformation in M(BDC) (M=Cu, Zn, Cd) metal-organic frameworks[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 54(6): 3636-3642.
97	BRITT David, TRANCHEMONTAGNE David, YAGHI Omar M. Metal-organic frameworks with high capacity and selectivity for harmful gases[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008, 105(33): 11623-11627.
98	PETIT Camille, HUANG Liangliang, JAGIELLO Jacek, et al. Toward understanding reactive adsorption of ammonia on Cu-MOF/graphite oxide nanocomposites[J]. Langmuir, 2011, 27(21): 13043-13051.
99	DECOSTE J B, PETERSON G W, SCHINDLER B J, et al. The effect of water adsorption on the structure of the carboxylate containing metal-organic frameworks Cu-BTC, Mg-MOF-74, and UiO-66[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2013, 1(38): 11922-11932.
100	GHOSH P, KIM K C, SNURR R Q. Modeling water and ammonia adsorption in hydrophobic metal-organic frameworks: single components and mixtures[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2014, 118(2): 1102-1110.
101	CHEN C C, ZHU H, LI B G, et al. Structuring metal-organic framework materials into hierarchically porous composites through one-pot fabrication strategy[J]. Chemistry: A European Journal, 2020, 26(15): 3358-3363.
102	DING M L, CAI X C, JIANG H L. Improving MOF stability: approaches and applications[J]. Chemical Science, 2019, 10(44): 10209-10230.
103	LIN Y Q, WU H C, YASUI T, et al. Development of an HKUST-1 nanofiller-templated poly(ether sulfone) mixed matrix membrane for a highly efficient ultrafiltration process[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(20): 18782-18796.
104	PETIT Camille, MENDOZA Barbara, BANDOSZ Teresa J. Reactive adsorption of ammonia on Cu-based MOF/graphene composites[J]. Langmuir, 2010, 26(19): 15302-15309.
105	TRAN THANH Tung, MANH TRUNG Tran, FELLER Jean-Francois, et al. Graphene and metal organic frameworks (MOFs) hybridization for tunable chemoresistive sensors for detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) biomarkers[J]. Carbon, 2020, 159: 333-344.
106	ZHANG Y Y, ZHANG X, CHEN Z J, et al. A flexible interpenetrated zirconium-based metal-organic framework with high affinity toward ammonia[J]. Chemsuschem, 2020, 13(7): 1710-1714.
107	YANG S H, SUN J L, RAMIREZ-CUESTA A J, et al. Selectivity and direct visualization of carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide in a decorated porous host[J]. Nature Chemistry, 2012, 4(11): 887-894.
108	AGUILA Briana, SUN Qi, PERMAN Jason A, et al. Efficient mercury capture using functionalized porous organic polymer[J]. Advanced Materials, 2017, 29(31): 1700665.
109	SHAO Lishu, SANG Yafei, HUANG Jianhan, et al. Triazine-based hyper-cross-linked polymers with inorganic-organic hybrid framework derived porous carbons for CO₂ capture[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 353: 1-14.
110	BHANJA Piyali, MODAK Arindam, BHAUMIK Asim. Porous organic polymers for CO₂ storage and conversion reactions[J]. ChemCatChem, 2019, 11(1): 244-257.
111	LIANG J, HUANG Y B, CAO R. Metal-organic frameworks and porous organic polymers for sustainable fixation of carbon dioxide into cyclic carbonates[J]. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 2019, 378: 32-65.
112	GE Yuxin, ZHOU Hao, JI Yujin, et al. Understanding water adsorption and the impact on CO₂ capture in chemically stable covalent organic frameworks[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2018, 122(48): 27495-27506.
113	SHINDE Digambar B, OSTWAL Mayur, WANG Xinbo, et al. Chlorine-functionalized keto-enamine-based covalent organic frameworks for CO₂ separation and capture[J]. CrystEngComm, 2018, 20(47): 7621-7625.
114	WANG Mengting, ZHOU Xin, ZANG Xiaohuan, et al. Determination of pesticides residues in vegetable and fruit samples by solid-phase microextraction with a covalent organic framework as the fiber coating coupled with gas chromatography and electron capture detection[J]. Journal of Separation Science, 2018, 41(21): 4038-4046.
115	YANG Yajie, FAHEEM Muhammad, WANG Lili, et al. Surface pore engineering of covalent organic frameworks for ammonia capture through synergistic multivariate and open metal site approaches[J]. ACS Central Science, 2018, 4(6): 748-754.
116	CHENG Youdong, ZHAI Linzhi, YING Yunpan, et al. Highly efficient CO₂ capture by mixed matrix membranes containing three-dimensional covalent organic framework fillers[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2019, 7(9): 4549-4560.
117	LI Peng, HE Yabing, GUANG Jie, et al. A homochiral microporous hydrogen-bonded organic framework for highly enantioselective separation of secondary alcohols[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2014, 136(2): 547-549.
118	LI Peng, HE Yabing, ZHAO Yunfeng, et al. A rod-packing microporous hydrogen-bonded organic framework for highly selective separation of C₂H₂/CO₂ at room temperature[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2015, 54(2): 574-577.
119	WANG Hailong, LI Bin, WU Hui, et al. A flexible microporous hydrogen-bonded organic framework for gas sorption and separation[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2015, 137(31): 9963-9970.
120	HISAKI Ichiro, SUZUKI Yuto, GOMEZ Eduardo, et al. Acid responsive hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2019, 141(5): 2111-2121.
121	LIN R B, HE Y B, LI P, et al. Multifunctional porous hydrogen-bonded organic framework materials[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2019, 48(5): 1362-1389.
122	HUMBECK Jeffrey F VAN, MCDONALD Thomas M, JING Xiaofei, et al. Ammonia capture in porous organic polymers densely functionalized with bronsted acid groups[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2014, 136(6): 2432-2440.
123	DOONAN Christian J, TRANCHEMONTAGNE David J, Grant GLOVER T, et al. Exceptional ammonia uptake by a covalent organic framework[J]. Nature Chemistry, 2010, 2(3): 235-238.
124	KANG D W, KANG M J, KIM H J, et al. A hydrogen-bonded organic framework (HOF) with type Ⅳ NH₃　adsorption behavior[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2019, 58(45): 16152-16155.

吸收剂种类	吸收条件		吸收量/mmol·g^-1	文献	吸收剂种类	吸收条件		吸收量/mmol·g^-1	文献
吸收剂种类	温度/K	压力/kPa	吸收量/mmol·g^-1	文献	吸收剂种类	温度/K	压力/kPa	吸收量/mmol·g^-1	文献
［Emim］［Ac］	298.3	101.3	1.88	［32］	［Choline］［NTf₂］	293.15	100	4.82	［35］
［Emim］［SCN］	298.1	101.3	2.64	［32］	［EtOHmim［NTf₂］	313	127	2.05	［36］
［Emim］［EtOSO₃］	298.15	418	2.35	［32］	［EtOHim］［NTf₂］	313	100	7.88	［37］
［DMEA］［Ac］	298.1	163	5.50	［32］	［Bim］［NTf₂］	313	100	6.65	［38］
［Bmim］［PF₆］	298.0	174	1.84	［33］	［C_nmim］₂［Co（NCS）₄］	303	100	10.59	［39］
［Hmim］［Cl］	297.8	133	1.45	［33］	ChCl∶Res∶Gly（1∶3∶5）	313	101	7.65	［40］
［Emim］［NTf₂］	323.15	171	0.24	［33］	ChCl∶D-f∶Gly（1∶3∶5）	313	101	6.47	［40］
［Bmim］［BF₄］	313.15	101.3	1.71	［33］	Bmim∶MeSO₃（1∶1）	313.2	172.6	1.05	［41］
［C₂MIM］［BF₄］	298.15	110	0.94	［34］	ChCl∶PhOH∶EG（1∶5∶4）	313.2	101.3	6.99	［42］
［C₄MIM］［BF₄］	298.15	220	2.01	［34］	NH₄SCN：Gly（2∶3）	303	100	10.35	［43］
［C₆MIM］［BF₄］	298.15	220	2.24	［34］	ChCl∶ImZ∶EG（3∶7∶14）	313.2	101.6	4.91	［44］
［C₈MIM］［BF₄］	298.15	120	1.41	［34］	EaCl∶Gly（1∶2）	298.2	106.7	9.63	［45］

吸收剂种类	吸收条件		吸收量/mmol·g^-1	文献	吸收剂种类	吸收条件		吸收量/mmol·g^-1	文献
吸收剂种类	温度/K	压力/kPa	吸收量/mmol·g^-1	文献	吸收剂种类	温度/K	压力/kPa	吸收量/mmol·g^-1	文献
［Emim］［Ac］	298.3	101.3	1.88	［32］	［Choline］［NTf₂］	293.15	100	4.82	［35］
［Emim］［SCN］	298.1	101.3	2.64	［32］	［EtOHmim［NTf₂］	313	127	2.05	［36］
［Emim］［EtOSO₃］	298.15	418	2.35	［32］	［EtOHim］［NTf₂］	313	100	7.88	［37］
［DMEA］［Ac］	298.1	163	5.50	［32］	［Bim］［NTf₂］	313	100	6.65	［38］
［Bmim］［PF₆］	298.0	174	1.84	［33］	［C_nmim］₂［Co（NCS）₄］	303	100	10.59	［39］
［Hmim］［Cl］	297.8	133	1.45	［33］	ChCl∶Res∶Gly（1∶3∶5）	313	101	7.65	［40］
［Emim］［NTf₂］	323.15	171	0.24	［33］	ChCl∶D-f∶Gly（1∶3∶5）	313	101	6.47	［40］
［Bmim］［BF₄］	313.15	101.3	1.71	［33］	Bmim∶MeSO₃（1∶1）	313.2	172.6	1.05	［41］
［C₂MIM］［BF₄］	298.15	110	0.94	［34］	ChCl∶PhOH∶EG（1∶5∶4）	313.2	101.3	6.99	［42］
［C₄MIM］［BF₄］	298.15	220	2.01	［34］	NH₄SCN：Gly（2∶3）	303	100	10.35	［43］
［C₆MIM］［BF₄］	298.15	220	2.24	［34］	ChCl∶ImZ∶EG（3∶7∶14）	313.2	101.6	4.91	［44］
［C₈MIM］［BF₄］	298.15	120	1.41	［34］	EaCl∶Gly（1∶2）	298.2	106.7	9.63	［45］

分子筛	温度/K	低压		常压
分子筛	温度/K	NH₃分压/kPa	平衡吸附量/mmol·g^-1	NH₃分压/kPa	平衡吸附量/mmol·g^-1
4A zeolite TG242	298.15	0.0171	2.039	97.8	8.717
5A zeolite KE154	298.15	0.0058	1.864	97.6	7.674
13X zeolite WE894	298.15	0.0041	1.742	93.8	9.326
5A zeolite Lancaster	298.15	0.0126	3.206	97.7	7.815
13X zeolite Lancaster	298.15	0.058	3.786	97.4	9.326
5A zeolite Sigma	298.15	0.0085	2.460	98.7	7.430
13X zeolite Sigma	298.15	0.0115	2.489	96.7	9.030

分子筛	温度/K	低压		常压
分子筛	温度/K	NH₃分压/kPa	平衡吸附量/mmol·g^-1	NH₃分压/kPa	平衡吸附量/mmol·g^-1
4A zeolite TG242	298.15	0.0171	2.039	97.8	8.717
5A zeolite KE154	298.15	0.0058	1.864	97.6	7.674
13X zeolite WE894	298.15	0.0041	1.742	93.8	9.326
5A zeolite Lancaster	298.15	0.0126	3.206	97.7	7.815
13X zeolite Lancaster	298.15	0.058	3.786	97.4	9.326
5A zeolite Sigma	298.15	0.0085	2.460	98.7	7.430
13X zeolite Sigma	298.15	0.0115	2.489	96.7	9.030

材料	组成	298K、1bar下动态吸附容量/mmol·g^-1
PB	Na_0.05Fe［Fe（CN）₆］_0.70·5.3H₂O	3.1
CoPBA	K_0.05Co［Co（CN）₆］_0.66·4.4H₂O	1.9
FePBA（CoⅢ）	Fe［Co（CN）6］₂·3.4H₂O（estimated）	2.5
CuPBA（FeⅡ），［Fe（CN）₆］·Cu=0.66	K_0.64Cu［Fe（CN）₆］_0.66·3.2H₂O	2.6
CuPBA（FeⅡ），［Fe（CN）₆］·Cu=0.59	K_0.33Cu［Fe（CN）₆］_0.59·4.1H₂O	2.1
CuPBA（FeⅡ），［Fe（CN）₆］·Cu=0.57	K_0.19Cu［Fe（CN）₆］_0.57·4.4H₂O	2.7
CuPBA	K_0.05Cu［Fe（CN）₆］_0.46·5.0H₂O	2.1
离子交换树脂（IE）		0.38
13X 分子筛（ZL）		0.28
AC 分子筛		0.02