酸性氧化物和酸碱比对煤灰熔融行为的影响

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2019-1920

化工进展 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 3617-3625.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2019-1920

酸性氧化物和酸碱比对煤灰熔融行为的影响

郑烨¹^,²(), 李建波³, 张锴¹^,²(), 关彦军¹, 杨凤玲⁴, 程芳琴⁴

^1.华北电力大学热电生产过程污染物监测与控制北京市重点实验室，北京 102206
^2.华北电力大学电站能量传递转化与系统教育部重点实验室，北京 102206
^3.重庆大学低品位能源利用技术及系统教育部重点实验室，重庆 400044
^4.山西大学资源与环境工程研究所，国家环境保护煤炭废弃物资源化高效利用技术重点实验室，山西太原 030006

出版日期:2020-09-05 发布日期:2020-09-11
通讯作者: 张锴
作者简介:郑烨（1987—），男，博士研究生，研究方向为煤灰化学。E-mail：1142102039@ncepu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金委与山西煤基低碳联合基金重点项目(U1910215);中央高校基本科研业务费专项(2018ZD03)

Effect of acid oxides and acid to basic ratio on ash fusion characteristics

Ye ZHENG¹^,²(), Jianbo LI³, Kai ZHANG¹^,²(), Yanjun GUAN¹, Fengling YANG⁴, Fangqin CHENG⁴

^1.Beijing Key Lab of Emission Surveillance and Control for Thermal Power generation, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
^2.Key Lab of Power Station Energy Transfer Conversion and System (North China Electric Power University), MOE, Beijing 102206, China
^3.Key Lab of Low-grade Energy Utilization Technologies and Systems of MOE, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
^4.State Environmental Protection Key Lab of Efficient Utilization Technology of Coal Waste Resources, Institute of Resource and Environment Engineering, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China

Online:2020-09-05 Published:2020-09-11
Contact: Kai ZHANG

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了研究酸性氧化物（SiO₂和Al₂O₃）的相对含量和酸碱比对煤灰熔融行为的影响，本文以准东煤灰化学组成为基础，利用分析纯试剂制备了28组合成灰样品，在马弗炉815℃灰化后利用灰熔融特性分析仪、扫描电子显微镜-能谱仪（SEM-EDS）和X射线衍射仪（XRD）对样品熔融特性、表观形貌和矿物组成进行表征。进而采用多元线性回归法建立了灰熔融温度预测模型，并对该模型的适用性进行了检验。结果表明：在相同酸碱比下，当SiO₂含量由9%上升至33.73%，而Al₂O₃含量由35.98%降至11.25%时，合成灰的变形温度（DT）、软化温度（ST）、半球温度（HT）和流动温度（FT）均呈单调下降趋势，这意味着SiO₂含量的增加可能促进了煤灰的熔融过程；在不同碱酸比下，合成灰的熔融温度随着酸碱比的增加呈先下降后升高的变化趋势，在酸碱比为1.25时合成灰的特征温度出现最小值，表明酸碱比对合成灰熔融温度的影响呈非线性关系。通过SEM-EDS和XRD表征发现，合成灰中CaO、Fe₂O₃、Ca₂MgSiO₇、Ca₂Fe₂O₅、SiO₂和Al₂O₃等耐熔矿物和CaSiO₃等助熔矿物的相对含量以及与钠相关的低温共熔反应是改变合成灰熔融温度的主要因素。本文所建立模型对文献中6组灰样4个特征温度的预测结果与其对应测量值之间最大残差绝对值均小于80℃，说明该模型在本文的合成灰化学组分范围内可用性较好，具有一定的应用价值。

关键词: 合成灰, 灰熔融温度, 矿物组成, 微观形貌, 预测模型

Abstract:

The influence of acid oxide content and acid to basic ratio (A/B) on ash fusion characteristics were investigated by using twenty-eight synthetic ashes comprising of the main chemical compositions of a typical Zhundong coal. The synthetic samples were firstly ashed in a muffle furnace at 815℃, and then subjected to ash fusion analyzer, SEM-EDS and XRD analysis for their fusion temperatures (AFTs), morphological and mineralogical characteristics. Furthermore, a set of prediction models for four fusion temperatures was established by using regression analysis method, based on their chemical compositions and corresponding fusion temperatures of the ash samples. The results showed that at the same A/B ratio, the deformation temperature (DT), softening temperature (ST), hemispherical temperature (HT) and flow temperature (FT) of synthetic ashes decreased remarkably when SiO₂ content increased from 9% to 33.73%, while Al₂O₃ decreased from 35.98% to 11.25%, indicating that the addition of SiO₂ might promote ash fusions. While at different A/B ratios, the AFTs of synthetic ashes decreased first, reaching the minimum AFTs at A/B_{of 1.25, but increased afterwards with increasing A/B ratio, exhibiting a non-linear correlation between A/B and ATFs. The results from SEM-EDS and XRD revealed that the fusion characteristics of the synthetic ashes were mainly dependent on the refractory minerals such as CaO, Fe₂O₃, Ca₂MgSiO₇, Ca₂Fe₂O₅, SiO₂ and Al₂O₃,_{and the fluxing minerals such as CaSiO₃, as well as the degree of eutectic formation associated with Na-bearing minerals. The absolute residual errors between the predicted values by the models suggested in this study and the measured results of six ash samples in literature were within 80℃ (abs), suggesting that the current prediction models are applicable for predicting coal ash fusion temperatures, as long as its chemical composition is within the current experimental range.}}

Key words: synthetic ash, ash fusion temperatures, mineral composition, micromorphology, prediction models

中图分类号:

TQ536.4

郑烨, 李建波, 张锴, 关彦军, 杨凤玲, 程芳琴. 酸性氧化物和酸碱比对煤灰熔融行为的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(9): 3617-3625.

Ye ZHENG, Jianbo LI, Kai ZHANG, Yanjun GUAN, Fengling YANG, Fangqin CHENG. Effect of acid oxides and acid to basic ratio on ash fusion characteristics[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(9): 3617-3625.

参考文献

1	王云刚, 赵钦新, 马海东, 等. 准东煤灰熔融特性试验研究[J]. 动力工程学报, 2013, 33 (11): 841-846.
1	WANG Yungang, ZHAO Qinxin, MA Haidong, et al. Experimental study on ash fusion characteristics of Zhundong coal[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2013, 33 (11): 841-846.
2	张守玉, 陈川, 施大钟, 等. 高钠煤燃烧利用现状[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2013, 33 (5): 1-12.
2	ZHANG Shouyu, CHEN Chuan, SHI Dazhong, et al. Situation of combustion utilization of high sodium coal[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2013, 33 (5): 1-12.
3	WANG X, XU Z, WEI B, et al. The ash deposition mechanism in boilers burning Zhundong coal with high contents of sodium and calcium: study from ash evaporating to condensing[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 80: 150-159.
4	陈晓东, 孔令学, 白进, 等. 高温气化条件下Na₂O对煤灰中矿物质演化行为的影响[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2016, 44 (3): 263-272.
4	CHEN Xiaodong, KONG Lingxue, BAI Jin, et al. Effect of Na₂O on mineral transformation of coal ash under high temperature gasification condition[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2016, 44 (3): 263-272.
5	LUAN C, YOU C F, ZHANG D K. Composition and sintering characteristics of ashes from co-firing of coal and biomass in a laboratory-scale drop tube furnace[J]. Energy, 2014, 69: 562-570.
6	VASSILEV S V, KITANO K, TAKEDAB S, et al. Influence of mineral and chemical composition of coal ashes on their fusibility [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 1995 (45): 27-51.
7	郑烨, 李建波, 关彦军, 等. 碱性氧化物对煤灰熔融特征行为的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(2):496-505.
7	ZHENG Ye, LI Jianbo, GUAN Yanjun, et al. Effects of basic oxides on ash fusion characteristic of coal ash[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(2):496-505.
8	ZHAO Y L, ZHANG Y M, BAO S X, et al. Effect of stone coal chemical composition on sintering behavior during roasting[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2014, 53: 157-163.
9	许洁, 刘霞, 张庆, 等. 高钙山鑫煤灰熔融及黏温特性分析[J]. 电机工程学报, 2013, 33(20): 46-51.
9	XU Jie, LIU Xia, ZHANG Qing, et al. Research on ash fusibility and viscosity-temperature characteristics of high-calcium Shanxin coal ash[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2013, 33(20): 46-51.
10	DYK J C. Understanding the influence of acidic components (Si, Al, and Ti) on ash flow temperature of South African coal sources[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2006, 19: 280-286.
11	魏砾宏, 马婷婷, 李润东, 等. 灰中酸性成分对灰熔融温度的影响[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2014, 42(10): 1205-1211.
11	WEI Lihong, MA Tingting, LI Rundong, et al. Effect of acidic compositions on ash fusion temperatures[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2014, 42(10): 1205-1211.
12	PRONOBIS M. Evaluation of the influence of biomass co-combustion on boiler furnace slagging by means of fusibility correlations [J]. Biomass & Bioenergy, 2005(28): 375-383.
13	ERICK R. Mineral impurities in coal combustion: behavior, problems, and remedial measures[M]. Bristol: Hemisphere Pulishing, 1985: 160-166.
14	XU J, LIU X, ZHAO F, et al. Study on fusibility and flow behavior of high-calcium coal ash[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 2014, 47 (9): 711-716.
15	郑烨, 马志斌, 关彦军, 等. 煤矸石灰添加对准东煤灰熔融特性影响[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(4): 1714-1720.
15	ZHENG Ye, MA Zhibin, GUAN Yanjun, et al. Effect of coal gangue ash addition on the fusibility of Zhundong coal ashes[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(4): 1714-1720.
16	王勤辉, 景妮洁, 骆仲泱, 等. 灰成分影响煤灰烧结温度的实验研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2010, 35(6): 1015-1020.
16	WANG Qinhui, JING Nijie, LUO Zhongyang, et al. Experiments on the effect of chemical components of coal ash on the sintering temperature[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2010, 35(6): 1015-1020.
17	范建勇，周永刚，李培, 等. 准东煤灰熔融温度表征结渣特性的试验研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2013, 38(2): 478-482.
17	FAN Jianyong, ZHOU Yonggang, LI Pei, et al. Reserch on Zhundong coal’s ash melting temperature characterizing its slagging characteristics[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013, 38(2): 478-482.
18	LIU B, HE Q H, JIANG Z H, et al. Relationship between coal ash composition and ash fusion temperatures [J]. Fuel, 2013, 105: 293-300.
19	LI W D, LI M, LI W F, et al. Study on the ash fusion temperatures of coal and sewage sludge mixtures[J]. Fuel, 2010, 89: 1566-1572.
20	阮芮彬, 龙兵, 刘志强, 等. 生物质灰熔融温度预测模型的研究[J]. 动力工程学报, 2013, 33(6): 484-489.
20	RUAN Ruibin, LONG Bing, LIU Zhiqiang, et al. Research on prediction model for fusion temperature of biomass ash[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2013, 33(6): 484-489.
21	CHEN X D, KONG L X, BAI J, et al. Study on fusibility of coal ash rich in sodium and sulfur by synthetic ash under different atmospheres[J]. Fuel, 2017, 202: 175-183.
22	FOLGUERAS M B, ALONSO M, FOLGUERAS J R, et al. Modification of lignite ash fusion temperatures by the addition of different types of sewage sludge[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2015, 131: 348-355.
23	WANG Y, WANG D X, DONG C Q, et al. The behaviour and reactions of sodium containing minerals in ash melting process[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2017, 90: 167-173.

[1]	田亚州, 胡钰婧, 李继友, 任江燕, 王立伟, 王修利, 丁颖, 程珏, 张军营. 香草醇基环氧树脂的合成、固化动力学及性能[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(S1): 477-484.
[2]	孙娜娜, 孙会娜, 沈莉莎, 苏瑞宇, 赵超. 磁性纳米颗粒-微波辐射对稠油O/W乳状液的协同破乳[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(6): 3127-3137.
[3]	于涵, 王宏, 朱恂, 丁玉栋, 陈蓉, 廖强. 静电喷雾沉积半径的预测模型[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(6): 2864-2870.
[4]	裴海华, 刘冬鑫, 张贵才, 单景玲, 蒋平. 塔河超稠油掺苯乙烯焦油降黏实验及黏度预测模型[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(S2): 135-141.
[5]	郑烨,李建波,关彦军,杨凤玲,张锴,程芳琴. 碱性氧化物对煤灰熔融特征行为的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(2): 496-505.
[6]	曾稳稳,邓付洁,蔡静波,王峰. 环氧乙烷反应器泄漏实时监测预警模型构建方法及应用[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(11): 5200-5209.
[7]	郑烨, 马志斌, 关彦军, 张锴, 程芳琴. 煤矸石灰添加对准东煤灰熔融特性影响[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(04): 1714-1720.
[8]	韦慧, 汤洋, 尤晖. 制备方法对钙钛矿薄膜结构及形貌的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(09): 3528-3533.
[9]	韦慧, 汤洋, 尤晖. 溶液法制备有机-无机杂化钙钛矿薄膜的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(07): 2672-2685.
[10]	娄江峰, 张华, 王瑞祥. 纳米冷冻机油热导率的实验研究[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(02): 495-499.
[11]	吴家鑫1，2，张国栋1，2，齐鹏1，2，郑应华1，2，何继红1，2. 黄霉素工业化发酵过程中灰色预测模型的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2013, 32(12): 2957-2960.
[12]	吴家鑫1，2，张国栋1，2，齐鹏1，2，郑应华1，2，何继红1，2，葛辛玫1，2，赵梅仙1，2，朱晓娟2. 黄霉素发酵过程的灰色关联度分析及其灰色预测模型[J]. 化工进展, 2013, 32(06): 1382-1384.
[13]	付兴，李敏霞，马一太，胡灿. 微小通道内流动沸腾换热的预测新模型[J]. 化工进展, 2013, 32(05): 991-995.
[14]	亢宇，张明森，王洪涛，谢伦嘉，姜健准，郭顺，邱波，刘长城. 不同形貌介孔材料催化剂的制备及在乙烯聚合中的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2012, 31(05): 1032-1038.
[15]	刘志琨1，王志荣1，陶汉中2. 换热设备污垢研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2011, 30(11): 2364-.

酸性氧化物和酸碱比对煤灰熔融行为的影响

Effect of acid oxides and acid to basic ratio on ash fusion characteristics

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价