多孔板压降特性实验与关联式比较

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-1960

化工进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (09): 3320-3325.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-1960

多孔板压降特性实验与关联式比较

焦乾峰¹, 马有福¹, 吕俊复², 蔡振琦¹, 彭杰伟¹, 孙选举³

1 上海理工大学能源与动力工程学院, 上海 200093;
2 清华大学热科学与动力工程教育部重点实验室, 北京 100084;
3 巴斯夫(中国)有限公司, 上海 200135

收稿日期:2017-09-17 修回日期:2018-01-22 出版日期:2018-09-05 发布日期:2018-09-05
通讯作者: 马有福,副教授,研究方向为气液两相流动和热力系统分析。
作者简介:焦乾峰(1992-),男,硕士研究生。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFB0600201）。

Comparison of experiment with correlation on pressure drop of multi-orifice plates

JIAO Qianfeng¹, MA Youfu¹, LÜ Junfu², CAI Zhenqi¹, PENG Jiewei¹, SUN Xuanju³

1 School of Energy and Power Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China;
2 Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
3 BASF(China) Company Limited, Shanghai 200135, China

Received:2017-09-17 Revised:2018-01-22 Online:2018-09-05 Published:2018-09-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 多孔板作为节流元件具有整流、低噪声、低压损及压差更稳定等优点，然而多孔板压降特性的预测方法目前仍不清晰。以常温水为实验介质，在Re数为4×10⁴~1.6×10⁵范围内，对孔数为172~744、等效直径比为0.544~0.666的多孔板进行了压降特性实验研究，并将实验结果与文献中相关的关联式预测结果进行了比较。结果表明：在相同开孔直径比和流动条件下与单孔板相比，多孔板后涡流引起的黏性耗散较小，因而其压损系数明显低于单孔板；计算多孔板压损系数时，若采用等面积折算所得等效直径比按单孔板进行计算，会使得预测结果明显偏大；Holt关联式的压损系数预测结果与实验结果最为相符，表明同时考虑开孔直径比和孔板相对厚度影响的压损系数关联式预测精度较优。建议通过进一步研究建立完善的多孔板压降预测方法。

关键词: 多孔板, 压损系数, 节流, 流动, 流体力学, 流体动力学

Abstract: Multi-orifice plate, as a throttle element, has various advantages in the flow rectification, low noises, low pressure loss and stable pressure drop for flux measurements. However, the prediction method of pressure drop characteristics of multi-orifice plates is still unclear so far. This paper performed an experimental study on the pressure drop characteristic of multi-orifice plates using city water as the fluid. Five orifice plates with the hole number from 172 to 744 and the equivalent diameter ratio of hole's to pipe's from 0.544 to 0.666 were tested in the Reynolds number from 4×10⁴ to 1.6×10⁵. The results showed that compared with the single orifice plate under the same equivalent diameter ratio and flow conditions, the viscous dissipation caused by the eddy current behind plates was small, resulting in the lower pressure loss coefficient for multi-orifice plates. Using the calculation method for the standard single orifice plate to predict the pressure loss coefficient of multi-orifice plates with a corrected parameter of the equivalent diameter ratio, which was recommended by the Chinese standard HG/T 20570.15-95, would lead to a marked overestimate. Therefore, such a simple method was not suitable for multi-orifice plates. The predicted results of the pressure loss coefficient with the Holt correlation were in good agreement with the experimental results, indicating that it was suitable to take both the equivalent diameter ratio and relative thickness into consideration in the correlation. It was suggested to study further in this regard for reaching a satisfied methodology of pressure drop prediction for multi-orifice plates.

Key words: multi-orifice plate, pressure loss coefficient, throttling, flow, fluid mechanics, hydrodynamics

中图分类号:

O352

焦乾峰, 马有福, 吕俊复, 蔡振琦, 彭杰伟, 孙选举. 多孔板压降特性实验与关联式比较[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(09): 3320-3325.

JIAO Qianfeng, MA Youfu, LÜ Junfu, CAI Zhenqi, PENG Jiewei, SUN Xuanju. Comparison of experiment with correlation on pressure drop of multi-orifice plates[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(09): 3320-3325.

参考文献

[1] 杨元龙.船舶凝水调节管道新型节流孔板设计研究[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(s2):95-100. YANG Yuanlong. Design study of new throttle orifice applying to marine condensation regulating pipeline[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(s2):95-100.
[2] 韩百顺.节流流量计测量脉动气流平均流量的研究[J].上海理工大学学报, 2000(1):25-28. HAN Baishun. Study on measuring mean flowrate of pulsating gas flow by mean of throttle flowmeter[J]. University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 2000(1):25-28.
[3] 朱懿渊, 姚征, 沈昱明. V锥差压流量计三维数值模拟与改进分析[J].上海理工大学学报, 2009, 31(2):155-159. ZHU Yiyuan, YAO Zheng, SHEN Yiming. Numerical simulation for V-cone flow meter and its further improvement[J]. University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 2009, 31(2):155-159.
[4] SINGH V K, THARAKAN T J. Numerical simulations for multi-hole orifice flow meter[J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2015, 45:375-383.
[5] 王翠华, 张平, 吴剑华, 等.网状孔板纵向流换热器壳程流体流动及换热的三维数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2011, 30(9):1932-1936. WANG Cuihua, ZHANG Ping, WU Jianhua, et al. Three-dimensional numerical simulation for shell side fluid flow and heat transfer characteristics in reticulated orifice-baffle longitudinal flow type heat exchangers[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2011, 30(9):1932-1936.
[6] 马太义, 王栋, 张炳东, 等.多孔板流量测量的实验研究[J]. 核动力工程, 2010(2):126-130. MA Taiyi, WANG Dong, ZHANG Bingdong, et al. Experimental on metering characteristics of multi-hole orifice[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2010(2):126-130.
[7] 耿艳峰, 冯叔初, 郑金吾.槽式孔板的气液两相压降倍率特性[J]. 化工学报, 2006, 57(5):1138-1142. GENG Yanfeng, FENG Shuchu, ZHENG Jinwu. Two-phase multipliers characteristics of slotted orifice[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China), 2006, 57(5):1138-1142.
[8] ALY E A, CHONG A, NICOLLEAU F, et al. Experimental study of the pressure drop after fractal-shaped orifices in turbulent pipe flows[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2010, 34(1):104-111.
[9] KOLODZOE P A, MATTHEW V W. Discharge coefficients through perforated plates[J]. AIChE Journal, 1957, 3(3):305-312.
[10] 周人. A+K平衡流量计的独特性能和典型应用[J].化工与医药工程, 2011, 32(3):54-57. ZHOU Ren. Unique characteristics and typical application of A+K balanced flow meter[J]. Pharmaceutical and Engineering Design, 2011, 32(3):54-57.
[11] SHAABAN S. On the performance of perforated plate with optimized hole geometry[J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2015, 46:44-50.
[12] ZHAO T, ZHANG J, MA L. A general structural design methodology for multi-hole orifices and its experimental application[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2011, 25(9):2237-2246.
[13] SHAN F, LIU Z, LIU W, et al. Effects of the orifice to pipe diameter ratio on orifice flows[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2016, 152:497-506.
[14] FOSSA M, GUGLIELMINI G. Pressure drop and void fraction profiles during horizontal flow through thin and thick orifices[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2002, 26(5):513-523.
[15] GUO B Y, HOU Q F, YU A B, et al. Numerical modelling of the gas flow through perforated plates[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2013, 91(3):403-408.
[16] 王慧锋, 凌长玺. 几何特征对多孔板特性的影响[J]. 华东理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 41(5):677-685. WANG Huifeng, LING Changxi. Effect of general characteristics for multi-hole orifices' features[J]. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2015, 41(5):677-685.
[17] HUANG S, MA T, WANG D, et al. Study on discharge coefficient of perforated orifices as a new kind of flowmeter[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2013, 46(4):74-83.
[18] 中华人民共和国化学工业部. 管路限流孔板的设置:HG/T 20570.15-95[S].北京:化学工业出版社, 1996. Ministry of Chemical Industry of the People's Republic of China. Setting of orifice plate for pipeline:HG/T 20570.15-95[S]. Beijing:Chemical Industry Press, 1996.
[19] 彭杰伟, 马有福, 吴恒亮, 等.水平管内多孔板后的气液两相流型可视化实验[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(6):2266-2274. PENG Jiewei, MA Youfu, WU Hengliang, et al. Visualization study on flow pattern of gas-liquid two-phase flowing through multi-orifice plate in a horizontal pipe[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(6):2266-2274.
[20] URNER G. Pressure loss of orifice plates according to ISO 5167-1[J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 1997, 8(1):39-41.
[21] IDELCHIK I E, STEINBERG M O, MALYAVSKAYA G R, et al. Handbook of hydraulic resistance[M]. 4nd ed. New York:Begell House, 1996:234-245.
[22] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 用安装在圆形界面管道中的差压装置测量满管流体流量:GB/T 2624.2-2006[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2006. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Measurement of fluid flow by means of pressure differential devices inserted in circular cross-section conduits running full-Part 2:Orifice plates:GB/T 2624.2-2006[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2006.
[23] International Organization for Standardization. Measurement of fluid flow by means of pressure differential devices-part1:orifice plates, nozzles and Venturi tubes inserted in circular cross-section conduits running full:ISO 5167-1[S]. Geneva:International Organization for Standardization, 2003.
[24] ÖZAHI E. An analysis on the pressure loss through perforated plates at moderate Reynolds numbers in turbulent flow regime[J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2015, 43:6-13.
[25] MILLER D S. Internal flow system[M]. Bedford, UK:BHR Group Limited, 1990:363-373.
[26] FRATINO U, PAGANO A, MALAVASI S, et al. Pressure drop and recovery across sharp-edged multi-hole orifices[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd IAHR Europe Conference. Munich, Germany:Technische Universität Munchen, 2012:27-29.
[27] HOLT G J, MAYNES D, BLOTTER J. Cavitation at sharp edge multi-hole baffle plates[C]//Proceedings of the ASME 2011 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Denver, CO, USA, 2011:11-17.

多孔板压降特性实验与关联式比较

Comparison of experiment with correlation on pressure drop of multi-orifice plates

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王云飞, 秦蕊, 郑利军, 李焱, 李清平. 旋转填充床CFD模拟研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 1-9.
[2]	赵晨, 苗天泽, 张朝阳, 洪芳军, 汪大海. 负压状态窄缝通道乙二醇水溶液传热特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 148-157.
[3]	黄益平, 李婷, 郑龙云, 戚傲, 陈政霖, 史天昊, 张新宇, 郭凯, 胡猛, 倪泽雨, 刘辉, 夏苗, 主凯, 刘春江. 三级环流反应器中气液流动与传质规律[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 175-188.
[4]	孙继鹏, 韩靖, 唐杨超, 闫汉博, 张杰瑶, 肖苹, 吴峰. 硫黄湿法成型过程数值模拟与操作参数优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 189-196.
[5]	李春利, 韩晓光, 刘加朋, 王亚涛, 王晨希, 王洪海, 彭胜. 填料塔液体分布器的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4479-4495.
[6]	陈林, 徐培渊, 张晓慧, 陈杰, 徐振军, 陈嘉祥, 密晓光, 冯永昌, 梅德清. 液化天然气绕管式换热器壳侧混合工质流动及传热特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4496-4503.
[7]	罗成, 范晓勇, 朱永红, 田丰, 崔楼伟, 杜崇鹏, 王飞利, 李冬, 郑化安. 中低温煤焦油加氢反应器不同分配器中液体分布的CFD模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4538-4549.
[8]	卜治丞, 焦波, 林海花, 孙洪源. 脉动热管计算流体力学模型与研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4167-4181.
[9]	孙征楠, 李洪晶, 荆国林, 张福宁, 颜飚, 刘晓燕. EVA及其改性聚合物在原油降凝剂领域的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2987-2998.
[10]	陶梦琦, 刘美红, 康宇驰. 基于micro-PIV的微通道内流体绕流单微圆柱和并联双微圆柱流场特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2836-2844.
[11]	陈伟良, 高鑫, 李洪, 李鑫钢. 泡沫碳化硅波纹规整填料骨架结构对其传质性能的影响机理[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2289-2297.
[12]	郭文杰, 翟玉玲, 陈文哲, 申鑫, 邢明. Al₂O₃-CuO/水混合纳米流体对流传热性能及热经济性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2315-2324.
[13]	张成松, 张静, 龚斌, 李明洋, 袁佳新, 李宏业. 自吸射流柔性搅拌桨振动特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1728-1738.
[14]	刘佳, 梁德青, 李君慧, 林德才, 吴思婷, 卢富勤. 油水体系水合物浆液流动保障研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1739-1759.
[15]	王文昊, 何立东, 王学志, 闫泽, 贾兴运, 刘春瑞. 偏心工况下梳齿、蜂窝与蜂窝-梳齿密封的泄漏特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1698-1707.