海上多孔介质通道内氢气换热与正仲氢转化的耦合特性

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-0892

化工进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 1281-1290.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-0892

海上多孔介质通道内氢气换热与正仲氢转化的耦合特性

孙崇正¹(), 樊欣², 李玉星²(), 许洁³, 韩辉², 刘亮²

^1.山东科技大学储能技术学院，山东青岛 266000
^2.中国石油大学(华东)储运与建筑工程学院山东省油气储运安全重点实验室，山东青岛 266580
^3.国家管网集团北京管道有限公司，北京 100101

收稿日期:2022-05-16 修回日期:2022-10-01 出版日期:2023-03-15 发布日期:2023-04-10
通讯作者: 李玉星
作者简介:孙崇正（1993—），男，博士，研究方向为氢气液化储运。E-mail：zgsydxscz@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(U21B2085);山东省自然科学基金(ZR2021QE073);中国博士后科学基金(2021M703587)

Coupling characteristics of hydrogen heat transfer and normal-parahydrogen conversion in offshore porous media channels

SUN Chongzheng¹(), FAN Xin², LI Yuxing²(), XU Jie³, HAN Hui², LIU Liang²

^1.College of Energy Storge Technology, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266000, Shandong China
^2.College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering/Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation Safety, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China
^3.PipeChina Beijing Pipeline Company, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2022-05-16 Revised:2022-10-01 Online:2023-03-15 Published:2023-04-10
Contact: LI Yuxing

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在我国“碳达峰、碳中和”的战略目标下，风电和化石能源制氢技术正不断发展，利用海上风电资源或天然气制备氢气，并通过储运技术送到氢能源市场，为解决海上风电并网和消纳的难题、促进深海天然气资源的低碳发展提供了可行的思路，因此研究应用于浮式氢气液化工艺系统的绕管式换热器海上适应性具有重要意义。本文基于多自由度的晃荡平台，搭建了浮式多孔介质通道内压降测试实验装置；基于多孔介质模型、正-仲氢转化和氢流动换热理论模型，建立了多孔介质通道内耦合正-仲氢转化的流动换热数值模型。通过实验与数值模拟相结合的方法，分析海况和水平条件下多孔介质换热通道的性能变化。研究结果表明，填充催化剂的绕管式换热器多孔介质通道内压降明显，温降不明显，管内仲氢含量增加；随着氢气流量的增加，传热系数逐渐增大，而出口仲氢的含量逐渐降低；海况对海上多孔介质换热通道的压降和传热特性影响较小。

关键词: 海上, 换热器, 氢气储运, 正仲氢转化, 氢气液化

Abstract:

Under our country’s strategic goal of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality, wind power and fossil energy hydrogen production technologies are constantly developing. Use offshore wind power resources or natural gas to produce hydrogen and send it to the hydrogen energy market through storage and transportation technology, which provides a feasible idea for solving the problems of offshore wind power grid integration and consumption and promotes the low-carbon development of deep-sea natural gas resources. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the offshore adaptability of the spiral wound heat exchanger applied in the floating hydrogen liquefaction process system. Based on the multi-degree-of-freedom sloshing platform, an experimental device for pressure drop testing in floating porous media channels was built. Based on the porous media model, the theoretical model of normal-parahydrogen conversion and hydrogen flow heat transfer, a numerical model of flow heat transfer coupled with normal-parahydrogen conversion in porous media channels was established. The performance changes of porous media heat exchange channels under sea and horizontal conditions were analyzed by a combination of experiments and numerical simulations. The research results showed that the pressure drop in the porous medium channel of the spiral wound heat exchanger filled with catalyst was obvious, the temperature drop was not obvious, and the parahydrogen content in the tube increased. With the increase of hydrogen flow, the heat transfer coefficient increased gradually, while the content of parahydrogen in the outlet decreased gradually. Sea conditions had little effect on the pressure drop and heat transfer characteristics of offshore porous media heat exchange channels.

Key words: offshore, heat exchanger, hydrogen storage and transportation, ortho-parahydrogen conversion, hydrogen liquefaction

中图分类号:

TE646

孙崇正, 樊欣, 李玉星, 许洁, 韩辉, 刘亮. 海上多孔介质通道内氢气换热与正仲氢转化的耦合特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1281-1290.

SUN Chongzheng, FAN Xin, LI Yuxing, XU Jie, HAN Hui, LIU Liang. Coupling characteristics of hydrogen heat transfer and normal-parahydrogen conversion in offshore porous media channels[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(3): 1281-1290.

图/表 15

图1 正仲氢形式与转化

图2 浮式多孔介质通道的压降测试实验流程图

图3 晃荡条件下多孔介质通道压降特性

图4 网格划分结构

图5 网格独立性检验

表1 模拟验证工况

介质	温度/K
氢气	78.15
甲烷	183.15
空气	298.15

表2 模拟值与理论计算值的误差

项目	氢气	甲烷	空气
模拟值/W·m^-2∙K^-1	107.20	18.26	21.18
理论计算值/W·m^-2∙K^-1	112.65	17.60	22.49
误差/%	-4.83	3.73	5.80

图6 换热通道内压力分布

图7 换热通道内温度分布

图8 换热通道内仲氢含量分布

图9 传热系数与出口仲氢含量随流量变化趋势

表3 出口仲氢含量预测模型参数

参数	数值
$a 1$	-0.05831
$a 2$	0.2703
$a 3$	-0.4197
$a 4$	0.5193

表3 出口仲氢含量预测模型参数

参数	数值
$a 1$	-0.05831
$a 2$	0.2703
$a 3$	-0.4197
$a 4$	0.5193

图10 海况和水平静止工况下温度分布

图11 海况和水平静止工况下仲氢含量分布

表4 晃荡工况下的传热系数和出口仲氢含量

管内 /mm	流量 /m³·h^-1	角度 /(°)	传热系数 /W·m^-2·K^-1	差值 /%	出口仲氢含量	差值 /%
10	0.5	0	12599.71096		0.36912
		9	12483.61525	0.92	0.36911	0
		12	11589.67453	-8.02	0.36911	0
	1	0	15442.91834		0.30950
		9	14582.40371	-5.57	0.30956	0
	1.5	0	17799.01002		0.30086
		9	17754.37357	-0.25	0.30086	0
14	0.5	0	5740.34689		0.36737
		9	5604.68529	-2.36	0.36737	0
	1	0	6249.877		0.30869
		9	6204.14362	-0.73	0.30869	0
18	1.5	0	10923.33892		0.30013
		9	11149.09857	2.07	0.30013	0

参考文献 29

12	CARDELLA Unberto, DECKER Lutz, KLEIN Harael. Economically viable large-scale hydrogen liquefaction[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2017, 171: 012013.
13	Øivind WILHELMSEN, BERSTAD David, AASEN Ailo, et al. Reducing the exergy destruction in the cryogenic heat exchangers of hydrogen liquefaction processes[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(10): 5033–5047.
14	PARK J, LIM H, RHEE G H, et al. Catalyst filled heat exchanger for hydrogen liquefaction[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2021, 170: 121007.
15	HO J C, WIJEYSUNDERA N E, RAJASEKAR S, et al. Performance of a compact, spiral coil heat exchanger[J]. Heat Recovery Systems and CHP, 1995, 15(5): 457-468.
16	ZACHÁR A. Analysis of coiled-tube heat exchangers to improve heat transfer rate with spirally corrugated wall[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2010, 53(19/20): 3928-3939.
17	PRABHANJAN D G, RAGHAVAN G S V, RENNIE T J. Comparison of heat transfer rates between a straight tube heat exchanger and a helically coiled heat exchanger[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2002, 29(2):185-191.
18	HO J C, WIJEYSUNDERA N E. Study of a compact spiral-coil cooling and dehumidifying heat exchanger[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 1996, 16(10): 777-790.
19	GENIĆ Srbislav B, JAĆIMOVIĆ Branislav M, JARIĆ Marko S, et al. Research on the shell-side thermal performances of heat exchangers with helical tube coils[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2012, 55(15/16): 4295-4300.
20	PACIO Julio Cesar, DORAO Carlos Alberto. A review on heat exchanger thermal hydraulic models for cryogenic applications[J]. Cryogenics, 2011, 51(7): 366-379.
21	MESSA Charles J, FOUST Alan S, POEHLEIN Gary W. Shell-side heat transfer coefficients in helical coil heat exchangers[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 1969, 8(3): 343-347.
22	JIAN G P, PETERSON G P, WANG S M. Experimental investigation of the condensation mechanisms in the shell side of spiral wound heat exchangers[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 154: 119733.
23	ZHU Jianlu, SUN Chongzheng, LI Yuxing, et al. Experiment on adaptability of feed gas flow rate and sea conditions on FLNG spiral wound heat exchanger[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 138: 659-666.
1	张轩, 樊昕晔, 吴振宇, 等. 氢能供应链成本分析及建议[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(5): 2364-2371.
	ZHANG Xuan, FAN Xinye, WU Zhenyu, et al. Hydrogen energy supply chain cost analysis and suggestions[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(5): 2364-2371.
2	陈晓露, 刘小敏, 王娟, 等. 液氢储运技术及标准化[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(9): 4806-4814.
	CHEN Xiaolu, LIU Xiaomin, WANG Juan, et al. Technology and standardization of liquid hydrogen storage and transportation[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(9): 4806-4814.
3	曹学文, 杨健, 边江, 等. 新型双压Linde-Hampson氢液化工艺设计与分析[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(12): 6663-6669.
	CAO Xuewen, YANG Jian, BIAN Jiang, et al. Design and analysis of a new type of dual-pressure Linde-Hampson hydrogen liquefaction process[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(12): 6663-6669.
4	WIJAYANTA Agung Tri, Takuya ODA, PURNOMO Chandra Wahyu, et al. Liquid hydrogen, methylcyclohexane, and ammonia as potential hydrogen storage: Comparison review[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(29): 15026-15044.
5	DONAUBAUER Philipp J, CARDELLA Umberto, DECKER Lutz, et al. Kinetics and heat exchanger design for catalytic ortho-para hydrogen conversion during liquefaction[J]. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2019, 42(11): 2476-2476.
6	YANG Jae Hyeon, YOON Younggak, Mincheol RYU, et al. Integrated hydrogen liquefaction process with steam methane reforming by using liquefied natural gas cooling system[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 255: 113840.
7	VALENTI Gianluca, MACCHI Ennio, BRIOSCHI Samuele. The influence of the thermodynamic model of equilibrium-hydrogen on the simulation of its liquefaction[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(14): 10779-10788.
8	LEE K H, KIM Y J, KIM H I, et al. Liquid hydrogen properties[R]. Daejon: Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2004.
9	陈双涛, 周楷淼, 赖天伟, 等. 大规模氢液化方法与装置[J]. 真空与低温, 2020, 26(3): 173-178.
	CHEN Shuangtao, ZHOU Kaimiao, LAI Tianwei, et al. Large-scale hydrogen liquefaction methods and devices[J]. Vacuum and Cryogenics, 2020, 26(3): 173-178.
10	SKAUGEN Geir, BERSTAD David, Øivind WILHELMSEN. Comparing exergy losses and evaluating the potential of catalyst-filled plate-fin and spiral-wound heat exchangers in a large-scale claude hydrogen liquefaction process[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(11): 6663-6679.
11	SEYAM Shaimaa, DINCER Ibrahim, Martin AGELIN-CHAAB. Analysis of a clean hydrogen liquefaction plant integrated with a geothermal system[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 243: 118562.
24	SUN Chongzheng, LI Yuxing, HAN Hui, et al. Experimental and numerical simulation study on the offshore adaptability of spiral wound heat exchanger in LNG-FPSO DMR natural gas liquefaction process[J]. Energy, 2019, 189: 116178.
25	SUN Chongzheng, LI Yuxing, HAN Hui, et al. Effect of compound sloshing conditions on pressure drop and heat transfer characteristics for FLNG spiral wound heat exchanger[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 159: 113791.
26	LEX T, OHLIG K, FREDHEIM A O, et al. Ready for floating LNG-qualification of spiral wound heat exchangers[C]//15th International Conference and Exhibition on Liquefied Natural Gas Spain. Barcelona, 2007: 960-973.
27	HUTCHINSON Harold Lee. Analysis of catalytic ortho-parahydrogen reaction mechanisms[D]. Colorado: University of Colorado, 1966.
28	HUTCHINSON H L, BROWN L F, BARRICK P L. A comparison of rate expressions for the low-temperature para-orthohydrogen shift[M]//Advances in Cryogenic Engineering. Boston: Springer, 1971: 96-103.
29	徐攀, 文键, 厉彦忠, 等. 氢正仲转化耦合流动换热板翅式换热器研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2021, 55(12): 16-24.
	XU Pan, WEN Jian, LI Yanzhong, et al. Study on hydrogen ortho-para conversion coupled with flow and heat transfer of the plate fin heat exchanger[J]. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University, 2021, 55(12): 16-24.

[1]	陈林, 徐培渊, 张晓慧, 陈杰, 徐振军, 陈嘉祥, 密晓光, 冯永昌, 梅德清. 液化天然气绕管式换热器壳侧混合工质流动及传热特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4496-4503.
[2]	王云刚, 焦健, 邓世丰, 赵钦新, 邵怀爽. 冷凝换热与协同脱硫性能实验分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4230-4237.
[3]	齐承鲁, 张忠良, 王明超, 李耀鹏, 宫晓辉, 孙鹏, 郑斌. 内置管束布置对换热器内固体颗粒流动的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2306-2314.
[4]	刘君康, 王宏超, 熊通, 晏刚, 郭宁, 刘睿. 热泵空调翅片管换热器流路优化研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(1): 107-117.
[5]	古新, 张前欣, 王超鹏, 方运阁, 李宁, 王永庆. U形导流板换热器传热和阻力性能分析[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(7): 3465-3474.
[6]	刘世杰, 莫逊, 涂爱民, 朱冬生, 谭连元. 新型纵流油冷却器壳程强化传热[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(7): 3475-3482.
[7]	蒋宁, 张元毅, 范伟, 赵世超, 徐新杰, 徐英杰. 基于智能预测和机理模型的换热网络清洗决策[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(4): 1781-1792.
[8]	马小娟, 王彧斐, 冯霄. 天然气水合物开采平台能量系统优化[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(3): 1667-1676.
[9]	林伟翔, 苏港川, 陈强, 文键, AKRAPHON Janon, 王斯民. 沉浸式换热器超声强化传热影响因素[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(1): 40-51.
[10]	杨光, 邵卫卫. 印刷电路板换热器结构及传热关联式研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S1): 13-26.
[11]	张海南, 丁京, 邵双全, 田长青. 具有相变的三介质换热器的分析[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S1): 43-49.
[12]	蒋坤卿, 黄思浩, 李华山, 卜宪标. 单井增强型地热系统性能分析[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(5): 2536-2545.
[13]	蒋旭光, 魏邦吉, 胡林飞, 王汝佩, 宋菲菲, 陈少卿. 循环流化床锅炉外置换热器的研究现状及在垃圾焚烧炉中的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(3): 1643-1652.
[14]	王哲, 韩凤翚, 纪玉龙, 李文华, 厉彦忠. 低温多股流板翅式换热器设计优化方法研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(2): 621-634.
[15]	陈康, 朱燕, 郑旭. 干燥剂换热器系统用吸湿性聚合物材料研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(2): 959-968.

海上多孔介质通道内氢气换热与正仲氢转化的耦合特性

Coupling characteristics of hydrogen heat transfer and normal-parahydrogen conversion in offshore porous media channels

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 29

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价