单井增强型地热系统性能分析

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-1285

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了解决深井换热器单井换热功率不高的问题，提出了一种单井增强型地热系统（single-well enhanced geothermal system，SEGS），SEGS通过在地热单井的钻孔周围建立人造热储来强化单井的换热能力。利用数值模拟的方式对SEGS进行了分析，研究了SEGS应用于建筑供暖的表现。结果表明：当换热流体采用由内管流入外管流出的流动方向布置形式时，SEGS的换热效果最好；此时单井单个供暖季平均换热功率为1603.6kW，是深井换热器的2.2倍。SEGS的换热功率随着人造热储半径的增大而增大，人造热储半径由50m提升至90m时，半径每增加10m带来的平均换热功率提升分别为102.7kW、67.0kW、43.8kW和29.2kW。单井换热功率随人造热储的厚度增加呈现先上升后略有下降的趋势，考虑到初投资问题建议热储厚度设计为400m。SEGS的换热功率随入口温度的降低以及入口流量的升高而增加。对于SEGS深度小于1500m的部分，需要考虑外管的保温。

关键词: 地热能, 深井换热器, 传热, 数值模拟, 多孔介质, 人造热储

Abstract:

In order to solve the problem of low heat transfer power of deep borehole heat exchanger, a single-well enhanced geothermal system (SEGS) was proposed. The SEGS enhances heat transfer capacity of a single geothermal well by establishing artificial heat storage around the borehole. The performance of SEGS used in building heating was studied by numerical simulation. The results showed that SEGS has the best heat transfer effect when the heat transfer fluid was arranged in the flow direction from the inner tube to the outer tube, the average heat transfer power of a single well heating system is 1603.6kW, which is 2.2 times of the deep borehole heat exchanger.The heat transfer power of SEGS increases with the increase of artificial heat storage radius. When the artificial heat storage radius increases from 50m to 90m, the average heat transfer power increase brought by every 10m increase in radius is 102.7kW, 67.0kW, 43.8kW and 29.2kW, respectively.With the increase of the thickness of artificial heat reservoir, the heat transfer power of single well presents a trend of first increased and then slightly decreased. Considering the initial investment, it is suggested that the thickness of artificial reservoir should be designed as 400m.The heat transfer power of SEGS increases with the decrease of inlet temperature and the increase of inlet flow. For parts with SEGS depth less than 1500m, the insulation of the outer tube should be considered.

Key words: geothermal energy, deep borehole heat exchanger, heat transfer, numerical simulation, porous media, artificial aquifer

中图分类号:

TK529

蒋坤卿, 黄思浩, 李华山, 卜宪标. 单井增强型地热系统性能分析[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(5): 2536-2545.

JIANG Kunqing, HUANG Sihao, LI Huashan, BU Xianbiao. Performance analysis of single well enhanced geothermal system[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(5): 2536-2545.

图/表 21

图1 SEGS结构

图2 导热模型模拟结果与试验结果对比

图3 试验砂箱

图4 多孔介质模型模拟与试验结果对比

图5 计算域

表1 物性参数

物质	密度/kg·m^-3	热导率/W·m^-1·K^-1	比热容/J·kg^-1·K^-1
水泥	2140	0.8	1900
岩石	2800	3.5	920
内管	910	0.21	1900
外管	8030	43.75	502.48
水	998.2	0.6	4182

表2 网格无关性验证结果

网格数量	出口温度/K
84234	307.92
105084	308.02
130284	308.03
231634	308.01
308334	308.01
535634	308.01

图6 SEGS和DBHE第一个供暖季换热功率随时间变化

图7 不同流向下供暖季末人造热储温度场变化情况

图8 两种地热井平均换热功率随时间的变化

图9 逆流形式SEGS第4供暖季末热储温度场变化

图10 第一供暖季末距井轴心0.5m处岩层温度变化情况

图11 不同固井水泥热导率下SEGS的换热功率随时间的变化

图12 不同热储厚度下SEGS的平均换热功率和出口水温

图13 不同热储半径的SEGS出口水温随时间的变化

图14 SEGS平均换热功率随热储半径的变化

图15 不同进口流量下SEGS的平均换热功率和出口温度

图16 内管平均出口温度随入口流量的变化

图17 不同入口流量条件下SEGS的增量变化情况

图18 SEGS平均出口水温和平均换热功率随入口水温的变化

图19 SEGS在不同进口温度下的逐日增量

参考文献 40

1	TEMPLETON J D, GHOREISHI-MADISEH S A, HASSANI F, et al. Abandoned petroleum wells as sustainable sources of geothermal energy[J]. Energy, 2014, 70: 366-373.
2	RYBACH L. Geothermal energy: sustainability and the environment[J]. Geothermics, 2003, 32(4-6): 463-470.
3	OLASOLO P, JUÁREZ M C, MORALES M P, et al. Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS): a review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 56: 133-144.
4	BARBIER E. Geothermal energy technology and current status: an overview[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2002, 6(1/2): 3-65.
5	许天福, 袁益龙, 姜振蛟, 等. 干热岩资源和增强型地热工程: 国际经验和我国展望[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1139-1152.
	XU Tianfu, YUAN Yilong, JIANG Zhenjiao, et al. Hot dry rock and enhanced geothermal engineering: international experience and China prospect[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(4): 1139-1152.
6	廖志杰, 万天丰, 张振国. 增强型地热系统: 潜力大、开发难[J]. 地学前缘, 2015, 22(1): 335-344.
	LIAO Zhijie, WAN Tianfeng, ZHANG Zhenguo. The enhanced geothermal system(EGS): huge capacity and difficult exploitation[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22(1): 335-344.
7	KUJAWA T, NOWAK W, STACHEL A A. Utilization of existing deep geological wells for acquisitions of geothermal energy[J]. Energy, 2006, 31: 650-664.
8	李克文, 王磊, 毛小平, 等. 油田伴生地热资源评价与高效开发[J]. 科技导报, 2012, 30(32): 32-41.
	LI Kewen, WANG Lei, MAO Xiaoping, et al. Evaluation and efficient development of geothermal resource associated with oilfield[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2012, 30(32): 32-41.
9	MORITA K, BOLLMEIER W S, MIZOGAMI H. An experiment to prove the concept of the downhole coaxial heat-exahanger (DCHE) in Hawaii[C]//MATA G. Anniversary-Geothermal Resources Council. 20th. Davis: Geothermal Resources Council, 1992: 9-16.
10	BU Xianbiao, JIANG Kunqing, LI Huashan. Performance of geothermal single well for intermittent heating[J]. Energy, 2019, 186: 115858.
11	SONG Xianzhi, WANG Gaosheng, SHI Yu, et al. Numerical analysis of heat extraction performance of a deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger geothermal system[J]. Energy, 2018, 164: 1298-1310.
12	DENG Jiewen, WEI Qingpeng, HE Shi, et al. Simulation analysis on the heat performance of deep borehole heat exchangers in medium-depth geothermal heat pump systems[J]. Energies, 2020, 13: 28.
13	DENG Jiewen, HE Shi, WEI Qingpeng, et al. Field test and optimization of heat pumps and water distribution systems in medium-depth geothermal heat pump systems[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2020, 209: 14.
14	LIU Jun, WANG Fenghao, CAI Wanlong, et al. Numerical investigation on the effects of geological parameters and layered subsurface on the thermal performance of medium-deep borehole heat exchanger[J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 149: 384-399.
15	LUO Yongqiang, YU Jinghua, YAN Tian, et al. Improved analytical modeling and system performance evaluation of deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger with segmented finite cylinder-source method[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2020, 212: 16.
16	PAN Sheng, KONG Yanlong, CHEN Chaofan, et al. Optimization of the utilization of deep borehole heat exchangers[J]. Geothermal Energy, 2020, 8(1): 1-20.
17	MOKHTARI H, HADIANNASAB H, MOSTAFAVI M, et al. Determination of optimum geothermal Rankine cycle parameters utilizing coaxial heat exchanger[J]. Energy, 2016, 102: 260-275.
18	CHENG Wenlong, LI Tongtong, NIAN Yongle, et al. Evaluation of working fluids for geothermal power generation from abandoned oil wells[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 118: 238-245.
19	WIGHT N M, BENNETT N S. Geothermal energy from abandoned oil and gas wells using water in combination with a closed wellbore[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 89: 908-915.
20	BU Xianbiao, MA Weibin, LI Huashan. Geothermal energy production utilizing abandoned oil and gas wells[J]. Renewable Energy, 2012, 41: 80-85.
21	DAVIS A P, MICHAELIDES E E. Geothermal power production from abandoned oil wells[J]. Energy, 2009, 34(7): 866-872.
22	CHENG Wenlong, LI Tongtong, NIAN Yongle, et al. Studies on geothermal power generation using abandoned oil wells[J]. Energy, 2013, 59: 248-254.
23	ALIMONTI C, SOLDO E. Study of geothermal power generation from a very deep oil well with a wellbore heat exchanger[J]. Renewable Energy, 2016, 86: 292-301.
24	孔彦龙, 陈超凡, 邵亥冰, 等. 深井换热技术原理及其换热量评估[J]. 地球物理学报, 2017, 60: 4741-4752.
	KONG Yanlong, CHEN Chaofan, SHAO Haibing, et al. Principle and capacity quantification of deep-borehole heat exchangers[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2017, 60: 4741-4752.
25	WANG Zhe, MCCLURE M W, HORNE R N. A single-well EGS configuration using a thermosiphon[C]//Thirty-Fourth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, 2009.
26	HUANG Wenbo, CAO Wenjiong, JIANG Fangming. A novel single-well geothermal system for hot dry rock geothermal energy exploitation[J]. Energy, 2018, 162: 630-644.
27	DAI Chuanshan, LI Jiashu, SHI Yu, et al. An experiment on heat extraction from a deep geothermal well using a downhole coaxial open loop design[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 252: 113447.
28	CHENG Wenlong, LIU Jian, NIAN Yongle, et al. Enhancing geothermal power generation from abandoned oil wells with thermal reservoirs[J]. Energy, 2016, 109: 537-545.
29	FENG Y, TYAGI M, WHITE C D. A downhole heat exchanger for horizontal wells in low-enthalpy geopressured geothermal brine reservoirs[J]. Geothermics, 2015, 53: 368-378.
30	PANEL M L. The future of geothermal energy: impact of enhanced geothermal systems[EGS] on the united states in the 21st century[EB/OL]. 2006.
31	HOLZBECHER E O. Modeling density-driven flow in porous media[M]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1998.
32	BATAILLE A, GENTHON P, RABINOWICZ M, et al. Modeling the coupling between free and forced convection in a vertical permeable slot: implications for the heat production of an enhanced geothermal system[J]. Geothermics, 2006, 35(5/6): 654-682.
33	BU Xianbiao, RAN Yunmin, ZHANG Dongdong. Experimental and simulation studies of geothermal single well for building heating[J]. Renewable Energy, 2019, 143: 1902-1909.
34	LI J, DAI C, LI F. Experiment and modeling of heat extraction from a cylindrical saturated porous tank with a coaxial open loop[C]// Proceedings World Geothermal Congress. Reykjavik, Iceland, 2020.
35	BECKERMANN C, VISKANTA R, RAMADHYANI S. Natural convection in vertical enclosures containing simultaneously fluid and porous layers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1988, 186: 257-284.
36	CHEN Jiliang, JIANG Fangming. Designing multi-well layout for enhanced geothermal system to better exploit hot dry rock geothermal energy[J]. Renewable Energy, 2015, 74: 37-48.
37	FANG Liang, DIAO Nairen, SHAO Zhukun, et al. A computationally efficient numerical model for heat transfer simulation of deep borehole heat exchangers[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2018, 167: 79-88.
38	KALMÁR L, MEDGYES T, SZANYI J. Specifying boundary conditions for economical closed loop deep geothermal heat production[J]. Energy, 2020, 196: 117068.
39	CAO Wenjiong, HUANG Wenbo, JIANG Fangming. Numerical study on variable thermophysical properties of heat transfer fluid affecting EGS heat extraction[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016, 92: 1205-1217.
40	陈雁. 地热井下换热器的模拟试验与理论研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2009.
	CHEN Yan. Experimental simulation and theoretical investigation on downhole heat exchanger[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2009.

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

625

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	0	1	0	624

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	187	438
比例	30%	70%

摘要

442

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

9	0	433

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	304	138
比例	69%	31%

[1]	郭强, 赵文凯, 肖永厚. 增强流体扰动强化变压吸附甲硫醚/氮气分离的数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 64-72.
[2]	李宁, 李金科, 董金善. 乙烯裂解炉多孔介质燃烧器的研究与开发[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 73-83.
[3]	邵博识, 谭宏博. 锯齿波纹板对挥发性有机物低温脱除过程强化模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 84-93.
[4]	肖辉, 张显均, 兰治科, 王苏豪, 王盛. 液态金属绕流管束流动传热进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 10-20.
[5]	王太, 苏硕, 李晟瑞, 马小龙, 刘春涛. 交流电场中贴壁气泡的动力学行为[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 133-141.
[6]	赵晨, 苗天泽, 张朝阳, 洪芳军, 汪大海. 负压状态窄缝通道乙二醇水溶液传热特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 148-157.
[7]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[8]	陈林, 徐培渊, 张晓慧, 陈杰, 徐振军, 陈嘉祥, 密晓光, 冯永昌, 梅德清. 液化天然气绕管式换热器壳侧混合工质流动及传热特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4496-4503.
[9]	刘炫麟, 王驿凯, 戴苏洲, 殷勇高. 热泵中氨基甲酸铵分解反应特性及反应器结构优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4522-4530.
[10]	徐茂淯, 陶帅, 齐聪, 梁林. 圆盘式环路热管的启动特性及温度波动[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4531-4537.
[11]	赵曦, 马浩然, 李平, 黄爱玲. 错位碰撞型微混合器混合性能的模拟分析与优化设计[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4559-4572.
[12]	卜治丞, 焦波, 林海花, 孙洪源. 脉动热管计算流体力学模型与研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4167-4181.
[13]	汪健生, 张辉鹏, 刘雪玲, 傅煜郭, 朱剑啸. 多孔介质结构对储层内流动和换热特性的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4212-4220.
[14]	王云刚, 焦健, 邓世丰, 赵钦新, 邵怀爽. 冷凝换热与协同脱硫性能实验分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4230-4237.
[15]	叶振东, 刘涵, 吕静, 张亚宁, 刘洪芝. 基于钙镁二元盐的热化学储能反应器的性能优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4307-4314.