泡状流中水合物生成预测模型及实验

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-0913

化工进展 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 5746-5754.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-0913

泡状流中水合物生成预测模型及实验

付玮琪¹(), 赵子贤¹, 于璟², 魏伟³, 王志远⁴, 黄炳香¹()

^1.中国矿业大学煤炭资源与安全开采国家重点实验室，江苏徐州 221116
^2.中国石油集团工程技术研究院有限公司，北京 102206
^3.中国石油集团勘探开发研究院（廊坊分院），河北廊坊 065099
^4.中国石油大学（华东）石油工程学院，山东青岛 266580

收稿日期:2022-05-17 修回日期:2022-07-19 出版日期:2022-11-25 发布日期:2022-11-28
通讯作者: 黄炳香
作者简介:付玮琪（1991—），男，副研究员，硕士生导师，研究方向为多相流、水合物流动保障。E-mail：weiqi_fu@126.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年基金(52104047);中国石油科技创新基金(2021DQ02—1005);江苏省自然科学基金(BK20210507);中国矿业大学煤炭资源与安全开采国家重点实验室自主研究课题(SKLCRSM22X002)

Prediction model of hydrate formation in bubbly flow and experimental study

FU Weiqi¹(), ZHAO Zixian¹, YU Jing², WEI Wei³, WANG Zhiyuan⁴, HUANG Bingxiang¹()

^1.State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China
^2.CNPC Engineering Technology R&D Company Limited, Beijing 102206, China
^3.CNPC Exploration and Development Institute (Langfang), Langfang 065099, Hebei, China
^4.School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China

Received:2022-05-17 Revised:2022-07-19 Online:2022-11-25 Published:2022-11-28
Contact: HUANG Bingxiang

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对可燃冰钻采井筒内易发生水合物生成和堵塞的工程问题，本文开展了泡状流条件下甲烷水合物生成实验，发现流速增加会提高水合物生成速率，黄原胶质量分数的增加会降低水合物生成速率。基于传质理论，构建了适用于可燃冰钻采井筒内泡状流条件下水合物生成预测模型，模型考虑了连续相流体流变性、气泡破裂、聚并和形变等因素对泡状流中气液界面分布和气液间传质规律的影响，并耦合实验数据，提出了气泡群间的综合传质系数经验公式，用于描述气泡间相互作用对气液间传质速率的影响。对比实验结果，所建立模型对水合物生成量和水合物生成速率的预测误差分别在±5%和±15%以内，满足工程计算需求。该模型的构建有助于精准预测油气和可燃冰钻采井筒内水合物风险，为建立经济、高效的井筒水合物防治方案奠定理论基础。

关键词: 泡状流, 水合物流动保障, 水合物生成, 传质

Abstract:

Considering the risks of hydrate formation and plug in the gas hydrate wellbore, experiments were conducted to investigate methane hydrate formation in bubbly flow using flow loop. Experimental results showed that the increases of flow velocities enhance the hydrate formation rates but the increases of xanthan gum concentrations reduced the hydrae formation rates. Based on gas-liquid mass transfer mechanism, a hydrate formation prediction model in bubbly flow was developed considering the influences of rheology of continuous-phase, and the breakage, coalescence and deformation of gas bubbles on the gas-liquid interfacial area and the gas-liquid mass transfer rate. Coupling with experimental data, an empirical formula of the overall mass transfer coefficient was proposed to describe the effect of interactions between gas bubbles on the gas-liquid mass transfer rates. Compared with experimental data, the developed model predicted the quantity of hydrate formation and the hydrate formation rate with the discrepancies within ±5% and ±15% respectively. The developed model contributed to forecast the hydrate risk in the oil, gas and natural gas hydrate wellbore and laid a theoretical foundation for developing an efficiency and economic hydrate management plan in wellbore.

Key words: bubbly flow, hydrate flow assurance, hydrate formation, mass transfer

中图分类号:

付玮琪, 赵子贤, 于璟, 魏伟, 王志远, 黄炳香. 泡状流中水合物生成预测模型及实验[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(11): 5746-5754.

FU Weiqi, ZHAO Zixian, YU Jing, WEI Wei, WANG Zhiyuan, HUANG Bingxiang. Prediction model of hydrate formation in bubbly flow and experimental study[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(11): 5746-5754.

图/表 7

图1 低温高压水合物多相流动环路流程图及实物图

表1 泡状流中水合物生成实验

序号	压力/MPa	温度/K	流速/m·s^-1	含气率（体积分数）/%	黄原胶质量分数/%
1	8.078	278.2	0.952	4.48	0
2	6.044	278.2	1.024	3.01	0
3	6.031	277.29	1.031	3.09	0
4	8.609	277.10	1.401	3.60	0
5	8.068	277.44	1.276	4.43	0.1
6	7.487	277.78	1.446	4.63	0.1
7	7.943	277.42	1.589	4.43	0.1
8	8.887	277.59	1.189	4.32	0.2
9	6.956	276.86	1.337	4.64	0.2
10	7.531	277.84	1.525	4.19	0.2
11	7.975	276.29	1.043	4.00	0.3
12	7.906	277.01	1.237	4.00	0.3
13	7.806	277.45	1.439	3.97	0.3

图2 流速1.024m/s、含气率3.0%和黄原胶质量分数为0条件下的水合物生成实验

图3 过冷度为5K条件下流速对水合物生成速率的影响规律

图4 流速为1.35m/s条件下黄原胶质量分数对水合物生成速率的影响规律

图5 参数a和b随黄原胶质量分数的变化规律

图6 模型预测的水合物生成量与实验数据对比

参考文献 25

1	李清平, 周守为, 赵佳飞, 等. 天然气水合物开采技术研究现状与展望[J]. 中国工程科学, 2022, 24(3): 214-224.
	LI Qingping, ZHOU Shouwei, ZHAO Jiafei, et al. Research status and prospects of natural gas hydrate exploitation technology[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2022, 24(3): 214-224.
2	张剑波, 张伟国, 王志远, 等. 深水气井测试水合物沉积堵塞预测与防治技术[C]//第三十届全国水动力学研讨会暨第十五届全国水动力学学术会议论文集(上册). 合肥, 2019: 135-145.
	ZHANG Jianbo, ZHANG Weiguo, WANG Zhiyuan, et al. Prediction and prevention of hydrate deposition and blockage during deepwater gas well testing[C]// Proceedings of the 30th National Symposium on hydrodynamics and the 15th National Symposium on Hydrodynamics (Volume I). Hefei: 2019: 135-145.
3	杨唐杨, 于常宏, 纪佳凯, 等. 含CaCl₂的深水油基钻井液中甲烷水合物的生成规律研究[J]. 新能源进展, 2021, 9(6): 533-539.
	YANG Tangyang, YU Changhong, JI Jiakai, et al. Study on methane hydrate formation in deepwater oil-based drilling fluid containing CaCl₂ [J]. Advances in New and Renewable Energy, 2021, 9(6): 533-539.
4	FU Weiqi, WANG Zhiyuan, SUN Baojiang, et al. A mass transfer model for hydrate formation in bubbly flow considering bubble-bubble interactions and bubble-hydrate particle interactions[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 127: 611-621.
5	FU Weiqi, YU Jing, XIAO Yang, et al. A pressure drop prediction model for hydrate slurry based on energy dissipation under turbulent flow condition[J]. Fuel, 2022, 311: 122188.
6	FU Weiqi, YU Jing, XU Yonghe, et al. A pressure drop prediction model for hydrate slurry based on energy dissipation under laminar flow condition[J]. SPE Journal, 2022, 27(4): 2257-2267.
7	VYSNIAUSKAS A, BISHNOI P R. A kinetic study of methane hydrate formation[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1983, 38(7): 1061-1072.
8	ENGLEZOS P, KALOGERAKIS N, DHOLABHAI P D, et al. Kinetics of formation of methane and ethane gas hydrates[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1987, 42(11): 2647-2658.
9	隋金昊, 王智, 梁璇玑, 等. 动力学抑制剂与乙二醇协同作用下甲烷水合物再生成[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(10): 5368-5375.
	SUI Jinhao, WANG Zhi, LIANG Xuanji, et al. Paried KHI-MEG for synergistic inhibition of methane hydrate reformation[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(10): 5368-5375.
10	闫明月, 王岳, 刘嘉琪, 等. 表面活性剂对甲烷水合物生成影响研究进展[J]. 应用化工, 2021, 50(8): 2317-2325.
	YAN Mingyue, WANG Yue, LIU Jiaqi, et al. Research progress on influence factors of methane hydrate formation in surfactant solution[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2021, 50(8): 2317-2325.
11	MOHEBBI V, NADERIFAR A, BEHBAHANI R M, et al. Investigation of kinetics of methane hydrate formation during isobaric and isochoric processes in an agitated reactor[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2012, 76: 58-65.
12	GONG Jing, SHI Bohui, ZHAO Jiankui. Natural gas hydrate shell model in gas-slurry pipeline flow[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, 2010, 19(3): 261-266.
13	宫敬, 史博会, 陈玉川, 等. 含天然气水合物的海底多相管输及其堵塞风险管控[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(12): 133-142.
	GONG Jing, SHI Bohui, CHEN Yuchuan, et al. Submarine multiphase pipeline transport containing natural gas hydrate and its plugging risk prevention and control[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(12): 133-142.
14	王志远, 张洋洋, 张剑波, 等. 深水气井水合物流动障碍形成机制与防治方法研究进展[J]. 中国科学基金, 2021, 35(6): 992-1005.
	WANG Zhiyuan, ZHANG Yangyang, ZHANG Jianbo, et al. Research progress on formation mechanism and prevention methods of hydrate flow barrier in deep-water gas wells[J]. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2021, 35(6): 992-1005.
15	DI LORENZO Mauricio, AMAN Zachary M, KOZIELSKI Karen, et al. Underinhibited hydrate formation and transport investigated using a single-pass gas-dominant flowloop[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2014, 28(11): 7274-7284.
16	WANG Zhiyuan, ZHANG Jianbo, SUN Baojiang, et al. A new hydrate deposition prediction model for gas-dominated systems with free water[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2017, 163: 145-154.
17	RUTHIYA Keshav C, VAN DER SCHAAF John, KUSTER Ben F M, et al. Influence of particles and electrolyte on gas hold-up and mass transfer in a slurry bubble column[J]. International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 2006, 4(1): 1-35.
18	FU Weiqi, WANG Zhiyuan, DUAN Wenguang, et al. Characterizing methane hydrate formation in the non-Newtonian fluid flowing system[J]. Fuel, 2019, 253: 474-487.
19	KAWASE Yoshinori, HASHIGUCHI Nanae. Gas—liquid mass transfer in external-loop airlift columns with Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids[J]. The Chemical Engineering Journal and the Biochemical Engineering Journal, 1996, 62(1): 35-42.
20	FU Weiqi, WANG Zhiyuan, SUN Baojiang, et al. Multiple controlling factors for methane hydrate formation in water-continuous system[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 131: 757-771.
21	ALOPAEUS Ville, KOSKINEN Jukka, KESKINEN Kari I, et al. Simulation of the population balances for liquid-liquid systems in a nonideal stirred tank. Part 2—Parameter fitting and the use of the multiblock model for dense dispersions[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2002, 57(10): 1815-1825.
22	HIBIKI Takashi, ISHII Mamoru. Interfacial area concentration in steady fully-developed bubbly flow[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2001, 44(18): 3443-3461.
23	LIU Liu, YAN Hongjie, ZHAO Guojian. Experimental studies on the shape and motion of air bubbles in viscous liquids[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2015, 62: 109-121.
24	BESAGNI G, INZOLI F, ZIEGENHEIN T, et al. Bubble aspect ratio in dense bubbly flows: experimental studies in low Morton-number systems[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2017, 923: 012014.
25	FU Weiqi, CHEN Bengang, ZHANG Kaibo, et al. Rheological behavior of hydrate slurry with xanthan gum and carboxmethylcellulose under high shear rate conditions[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2022, 36(6): 3169-3183.

[1]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[2]	杨寒月, 孔令真, 陈家庆, 孙欢, 宋家恺, 王思诚, 孔标. 微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器脱碳性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 197-204.
[3]	黄益平, 李婷, 郑龙云, 戚傲, 陈政霖, 史天昊, 张新宇, 郭凯, 胡猛, 倪泽雨, 刘辉, 夏苗, 主凯, 刘春江. 三级环流反应器中气液流动与传质规律[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 175-188.
[4]	盛维武, 程永攀, 陈强, 李小婷, 魏嘉, 李琳鸽, 陈险峰. 微气泡和微液滴双强化脱硫反应器操作分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 142-147.
[5]	邵博识, 谭宏博. 锯齿波纹板对挥发性有机物低温脱除过程强化模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 84-93.
[6]	李洞, 王倩倩, 张亮, 李俊, 付乾, 朱恂, 廖强. 非水系纳米流体热再生液流电池串联堆性能特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4238-4246.
[7]	李瑞东, 黄辉, 同国虎, 王跃社. 原油精馏塔中铵盐吸湿特性及其腐蚀行为[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2809-2818.
[8]	章凯, 金捍宇, 刘思宇, 王帅. 鼓泡流态化气泡间相互作用下相间传质过程的模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2828-2835.
[9]	马哲杰, 张文励, 赵炫凯, 李平. PEMFC阴极催化层氧传质阻力影响的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2860-2873.
[10]	陈伟良, 高鑫, 李洪, 李鑫钢. 泡沫碳化硅波纹规整填料骨架结构对其传质性能的影响机理[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2289-2297.
[11]	李雪, 王艳君, 王玉超, 陶胜洋. 仿生表面用于雾水收集的最新研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2486-2503.
[12]	田启凯, 郑海萍, 张少斌, 张静, 余子夷. 混合增强的微流控通道进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1677-1687.
[13]	尚玉, 肖满, 崔秋芳, 涂特, 晏水平. CO₂捕集工艺中热再生气余热的PVDF/BN-OH平板复合膜回收特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1618-1628.
[14]	王唯, 张东旭, 李遵照, 王晓霖, 黄启玉. 油包水乳状液体系中水合物生长行为研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1155-1166.
[15]	马云飞, 王建兵, 贾超敏, 邢懿心, 柯述, 张先. 臭氧氧化动力学模型及反应器建模研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(S1): 556-570.

泡状流中水合物生成预测模型及实验

Prediction model of hydrate formation in bubbly flow and experimental study

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价