氧化石墨烯/水脉动热管传热强化及性能预测

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-0769

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

实验研究了氧化石墨烯（GO）纳米流体对脉动热管（PHP）传热性能的影响。结果表明：充液率、浓度及加热功率显著影响脉动热管的传热性能。在小充液率（FR=30%）时，PHP更多是在重力辅助热虹吸管以及脉动热管的共同作用下工作，热阻较低，但容易烧干；添加GO纳米颗粒可改善流体传热性能，降低PHP热阻，延缓烧干；尤其在质量分数0.05%~0.08%、加热功率10~50W时热阻可比纯水降低38.1%~74.1%；在质量分数0.08%~0.1%时，烧干极限Q_max可比纯水提高33%。在大充液率（FR=80%）时，气相空间受限，流体运动阻力较大，PHP整体运行性能较差。添加GO纳米不能明显改善PHP传热性能，在高浓度（质量分数0.1%）时还会恶化传热性能。综合考虑热阻及烧干极限，PHP在中等充液率（FR=50%）时整体运行性能最佳；且存在一个合适的工作范围（质量分数0.03%~0.08%，加热功率20~105W），使PHP热阻比纯水下降18.9%~54.4%之间，强化作用明显。最后，在实验基础上，综合应用Ku、Pr、Ja、Bo、Mo等量纲为1数组合，拟合得到实验关联式预测GO/水PHP传热性能，适用于30%~80%充液率下，质量分数0~0.1%的GO/水纳米流体脉动热管。

关键词: 脉动热管, 氧化石墨烯, 传热强化, 充液率, 浓度, 关联式

Abstract:

Heat transfer enhancement and effects of graphene oxide (GO) nanofluid on a pulsating heat pipe (PHP) were studied experimentally. Results showed that heat transfer performance of the GO/water PHP was significantly affected by the filling ratio, concentration and heating power. At a lower filling ratio, e.g. 30%, the PHP worked under the combination of two-phase thermosyphon and pulsation role, showing the advantage of lower thermal resistance but the shortage of easier dry-out. Adding GO nanoparticles could improve the heat transfer performance, such as reducing the thermal resistance and alleviating dry-out effectively. Especially in the mass fraction of 0.05%—0.08% and Q=10—50W, the thermal resistance of the GO/water PHP was lower about 38.1%—74.1% than that of the water PHP. In the mass fraction of 0.08%—0.1%, the dry-out limitation Q_maxwas higher about 33% than that of pure water. At a higher filling ratio, e.g. 80%, the PHP had smaller vapor phase space for the fluid to move or pulsate. Thus, its overall operation was not quite satisfactory compared with the lower and medium filling ratios. At a higher filling ratio (FR=80%), adding GO nanoparticles could not improve the heat transfer performance of the PHP apparently, and the heat transfer performance was even deteriorated at higher concentrations (the mass fraction of 0.1%). In terms of the thermal resistance and dry-out limitation, the PHP achieved the best overall performance at a medium liquid filling ratio (FR=50%), and especially in the mass fraction of 0.03%—0.08% and Q=20—105 W, thermal resistance reduced about 18.9%—54.4% compared with the water PHP, showing the obvious enhancement effect. Finally, an empirical correlation was fitted based on Kutateladze number (Ku), Bond number (Bo), Morton number (Mo), Prandtl number of liquid (Pr), and Jacob number, to predict the thermal performance of the GO/water PHP with the nanofluid mass fraction in the range of 0—0.1% and the filling ratio in the range of 30%—80%.

Key words: pulsating heat pipe, graphene oxide, heat transfer enhancement, filling ratio, concentration, experimental correlation

中图分类号:

TK79

杨洪海, 张苗, 刘利伟, 周屹, 沈俊杰, 施伟刚, 尹勇. 氧化石墨烯/水脉动热管传热强化及性能预测[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(4): 1725-1734.

YANG Honghai, ZHANG Miao, LIU Liwei, ZHOU Yi, SHEN Junjie, SHI Weigang, YIN Yong. Heat transfer performance enhancement and prediction in GO/water pulsating heat pipe[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(4): 1725-1734.

图/表 15

表1 GNP及GO纳米流体在PHP中的应用

作者	工质及GO质量分数/%	充液率/%	加热功率/W	蒸发段长/mm	绝热段长/mm	冷凝段长/mm	弯头
Cui等^［14-15］	GNP/水：0.01，0.025，0.05，0.075，0.08，0.1	45~90	10~100^①	80	20	95	5
Su等^［16-18］	GO/水：0.05，0.1 GO/正丁醇水溶液：0.014	50	10~100^②	50	200	50	3
Nazari等^［19］	GO/水：0.025，0.05，0.1，0.15	50	10~70^②	75	95	208	2
本文作者	GO/水：0.015，0.03，0.05，0.08，0.1	30~80	10~105^①	75	20	100	3

图1 实验装置

图2 氧化石墨烯扫描电镜图

图3 GO纳米流体（GO质量分数0.05%）

表2 主要实验参数的不确定度

参数	不确定度/%
T_e	±0.28
T_c	±0.57
Q	±2.9
R	±5.0
q	±5.02

图4 平均蒸发及冷凝温度随功率的逐时变化（充液率=30%）

图5 热阻随加热功率及质量分数的变化（充液率=30%）

图6 GO质量分数对传热极限Qmax的影响（充液率=30%）

图7 平均蒸发及冷凝温度随功率的逐时变化（充液率=50%）

图8 热阻随加热功率及质量分数的变化（充液率=50%）

图9 GO纳米流体对PHP传热强化作用率（充液率=50%）

图10 平均蒸发及冷凝温度随功率逐时变化（充液率=80%）

图11 热阻随加热功率及质量分数变化（充液率=80%）

图12 不同充液率下GO/水PHP的传热性能比较（质量分数0.05%）

图13 Ku预测值与实验值比较

参考文献 44

1	XU Y Y, XUE Y Q, QI H, et al. An updated review on working fluids, operation mechanisms, and applications of pulsating heat pipes[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 144: 110995.
2	BASTAKOTI D, ZHANG H N, LI D, et al. An overview on the developing trend of pulsating heat pipe and its performance[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 141: 305-332.
3	冯剑超, 曲伟. 纳米流体脉动热管的性能实验[J]. 中国科学院研究生院学报, 2009, 26(1): 50-57.
	FENG Jianchao, QU Wei. Experimental investigation of heat transfer performance of nanofluid pulsating heat pipes[J]. Journal of the Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2009, 26(1): 50-57.
4	JI Y L, MA H B, SU F M, et al. Particle size effect on heat transfer performance in an oscillating heat pipe[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2011, 35(4): 724-727.
5	KARTHIKEYAN V K, RAMACHANDRAN K, PILLAI B C, et al. Effect of nanofluids on thermal performance of closed loop pulsating heat pipe[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2014, 54: 171-178.
6	WU Q P, XU R J, WANG R X, et al. Effect of C60 nanofluid on the thermal performance of a flat-plate pulsating heat pipe[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016, 100: 892-898.
7	ZUFAR M, GUNNASEGARAN P, KUMAR H M, et al. Numerical and experimental investigations of hybrid nanofluids on pulsating heat pipe performance[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 146: 118887.
8	QU J, WU H Y, CHENG P. Thermal performance of an oscillating heat pipe with Al₂O₃-water nanofluids[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2010, 37(2): 111-115.
9	LI Q M, ZOU J, YANG Z, et al. Visualization of two-phase flows in nanofluid oscillating heat pipes[J]. Journal of Heat Transfer, 2011, 133(5): 052901.
10	MEHRALI M, SADEGHINEZHAD E, LATIBARI S T, et al. Investigation of thermal conductivity and rheological properties of nanofluids containing graphene nanoplatelets[J]. Nanoscale Research Letters, 2014, 9(1): 15.
11	LEE G J, RHEE C K. Enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluids containing graphene nanoplatelets prepared by ultrasound irradiation[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2014, 49(4): 1506-1511.
12	SARSAM W S, AMIRI A, KAZI S N, et al. Stability and thermophysical properties of non-covalently functionalized graphene nanoplatelets nanofluids[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 116: 101-111.
13	张飞龙, 王莉, 俞树荣, 等. 氧化石墨烯及其导热纳米流体的制备与性能[J]. 功能材料, 2015, 46(16): 16138-16141.
	ZHANG Feilong, WANG Li, YU Shurong, et al. Preparation and properties of graphene oxide and theirthermal conductivity nanofluids[J]. Journal of Functional Materials, 2015, 46(16): 16138-16141.
14	施赛燕, 崔晓钰, 周宇, 等. 石墨烯/去离子水纳米流体振荡热管传热性能[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(12): 4944-4950.
	SHI Saiyan, CUI Xiaoyu, ZHOU Yu, et al. Heat transfer performance of pulsating heat pipe with graphene aqueous nanofluids[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(12): 4944-4950.
15	ZHOU Y, CUI X Y, WENG J H, et al. Experimental investigation of the heat transfer performance of an oscillating heat pipe with graphene nanofluids[J]. Powder Technology, 2018, 332: 371-380.
16	SU X J, ZHANG M, HAN W, et al. Enhancement of heat transport in oscillating heat pipe with ternary fluid[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2015, 87: 258-264.
17	张明, 苏新军, 韩魏, 等. 氧化石墨烯/自湿润流体脉动热管的传热特性[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(8): 2951-2954.
	ZHANG Ming, SU Xinjun, HAN Wei, et al. Heat transfer characteristics of pulsating heat pipe with graphene oxide/self-rewetting fluid[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2015, 34(8): 2951-2954.
18	韩魏, 苏新军, 张明, 等. 氧化石墨烯脉动热管传热性能实验研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2016, 37(6): 1476-1480.
	HAN Wei, SU Xinjun, ZHANG Ming, et al. Experimental study of thermal performance of pulsating heat pipe with graphene oxide[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2016, 37(6): 1476-1480.
19	NAZARI M A, GHASEMPOUR R, AHMADI M H, et al. Experimental investigation of graphene oxide nanofluid on heat transfer enhancement of pulsating heat pipe[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 91: 90-94.
20	CACUA K, BUITRAGO-SIERRA R, PABÓN E, et al. Nanofluids stability effect on a thermosyphon thermal performance[J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2020, 153: 106347.
21	KHANDEKAR S, CHAROENSAWAN P, GROLL M, et al. Closed loop pulsating heat pipes Part B: Visualization and semi-empirical modeling[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2003, 23(16): 2021-2033.
22	SHAFII M B, ARABNEJAD S, SABOOHI Y, et al. Experimental investigation of pulsating heat pipes and a proposed correlation[J]. Heat Transfer Engineering, 2010, 31(10): 854-861.
23	YEBOAH S K, DARKWA J. Thermal performance of a novel helically coiled oscillating heat pipe (HCOHP) for isothermal adsorption. An experimental study[J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2018, 128: 49-58.
24	SCHMULLER J. Statistical analysis with excel for dummies[J]. Wiley & Sons, 2013.
25	HALIMI M, ABBAS NEJAD A, NOROUZI M. A comprehensive experimental investigation of the performance of closed-loop pulsating heat pipes[J]. Journal of Heat Transfer, 2017, 139(9): 092003.
26	杨洪海, 林天伦, 万勍, 等. 开式脉动热管传热极限的试验研究[J]. 动力工程, 2009, 29(10): 936-940.
	YANG Honghai, LIN Tianlun, WAN Qing, et al. Experimental study on heat transfer limit of open loop pulsating heat pipes[J]. Journal of Power Engineering, 2009, 29(10): 936-940.
27	YANG H H, KHANDEKAR S, GROLL M. Operational limit of closed loop pulsating heat pipes[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2008, 28(1): 49-59.
28	毛兰, 周文斌, 胡学功, 等. 氧化石墨烯表面的饱和池沸腾强化传热实验[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(9): 4164-4173.
	MAO Lan, ZHOU Wenbin, HU Xuegong, et al. Enhanced pool boiling heat transfer performance on graphene oxide nanocoating surface[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(9): 4164-4173.
29	尹大燕, 贾力. 振荡热管管内流型对传热性能的影响[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2007, 15(3): 363-368.
	YIN Dayan, JIA Li. The influence of flow patterns on heat transfer characteristic of oscillating heat pipe[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2007, 15(3): 363-368.
30	王宇, 李惟毅. 充液率对单环路脉动热管启动运行的影响[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2011, 31(17): 79-85.
	WANG Yu, LI Weiyi. Influence of filling ratio on startup and operation of a single loop pulsating heat pipe[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2011, 31(17): 79-85.
31	YANG H H, KHANDEKAR S, GROLL M. Performance characteristics of pulsating heat pipes as integral thermal spreaders[J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2009, 48(4): 815-824.
32	JO J, KIM J, KIM S J. Experimental investigations of heat transfer mechanisms of a pulsating heat pipe[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 181: 331-341.
33	YUAN D Z, QU W, MA T Z. Flow and heat transfer of liquid plug and neighboring vapor slugs in a pulsating heat pipe[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2010, 53(7/8): 1260-1268.
34	RITTIDECH S, PIPATPAIBOON N, TERDTOON P. Heat-transfer characteristics of a closed-loop oscillating heat-pipe with check valves[J]. Applied Energy, 2007, 84(5): 565-577.
35	LIN Z R, WANG S F, CHEN J J, et al. Experimental study on effective range of miniature oscillating heat pipes[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2011, 31(5): 880-886.
36	HAN X H, WANG X H, ZHENG H C, et al. Review of the development of pulsating heat pipe for heat dissipation[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 59: 692-709.
37	QU J, WANG Q. Experimental study on the thermal performance of vertical closed-loop oscillating heat pipes and correlation modeling[J]. Applied Energy, 2013, 112: 1154-1160.
38	LIANG Q Q, HAO T T, WANG K, et al. Startup and transport characteristics of oscillating heat pipe using ionic liquids[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 94: 1-13.
39	EBRAHIMI DEHSHALI M, NAZARI M A, SHAFII M B. Thermal performance of rotating closed-loop pulsating heat pipes: experimental investigation and semi-empirical correlation[J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2018, 123: 14-26.
40	PAK B C, CHO Y I. Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron metallic oxide particles[J]. Experimental Heat Transfer, 1998, 11(2): 151-170.
41	SAID Z, ABDELKAREEM M A, REZK H, et al. Stability, thermophysical and electrical properties of synthesized carbon nanofiber and reduced-graphene oxide-based nanofluids and their hybrid along with fuzzy modeling approach[J]. Powder Technology, 2020, 364: 795-809.
42	刘利伟. 氧化石墨烯脉动热管传热特性及实验关联式的研究[D]. 上海: 东华大学, 2020.
	LIU Liwei. Study on heat transfer characteristics and experimental correlation of graphene oxide pulsating heat pipe[D]Shanghai: Donghua University,2020.
43	郑兆志, 何钦波, 刘玉东. 水基氧化石墨烯纳米流体表面张力实验研究[J]. 热科学与技术, 2015, 14(3): 203-207.
	ZHENG Zhaozhi, HE Qinbo, LIU Yudong. Experimental investigation on surface tension of water-based graphene oxide nanofluids[J]. Journal of Thermal Science and Technology, 2015, 14(3): 203-207.
44	IJAM A, SAIDUR R, GANESAN P, et al. Stability, thermo-physical properties, and electrical conductivity of graphene oxide-deionized water/ethylene glycol based nanofluid[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2015, 87: 92-103.

[1]	惠博, 侯宏艺, 张涛, 车生文. 圆柱形环状脉动热管烧干特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 33-40.
[2]	卜治丞, 焦波, 林海花, 孙洪源. 脉动热管计算流体力学模型与研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4167-4181.
[3]	许春树, 姚庆达, 梁永贤, 周华龙. 氧化石墨烯/碳纳米管对几种典型高分子材料的性能影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3012-3028.
[4]	张浩月, 李春丽, 徐博, 李筱贺, 仝铃, 邱广明. 分段取样法研究改进Hummers法制备GO结构特性及其机理[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2606-2615.
[5]	何阳, 李思盈, 李传强, 袁小亚, 郑旭煦. 热还原氧化石墨烯/环氧树脂复合涂层的防腐性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1983-1994.
[6]	高婷婷, 蒋振, 吴晓毅, 郝婷婷, 马学虎, 温荣福. 微乳液脉动热管应用于锂离子电池的散热性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1167-1177.
[7]	余俊声, 朱晔, 李乾坤, 徐士轩, 张昕阳, 汪城, 屈健. 升降热流条件下的脉动热管性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1178-1186.
[8]	郭志鹏, 卜宪标, 李华山, 龚宇烈, 王令宝. 基于热-流-化耦合作用的单井增强地热系统性能分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 711-721.
[9]	杨茂飞, 李金旺, 周刘伟. 亲水改性超薄平板热管传热性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 692-698.
[10]	张建伟, 许蕊, 张忠闯, 董鑫, 冯颖. 基于卷积神经网络的撞击流反应器浓度场混合特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 658-668.
[11]	朱戈, 毕勤成, 田书建, 颜建国. 非均匀高热通量内置纽带冷却通道阻力特性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(10): 5083-5091.
[12]	孙义明, 冉宝清, 卞武勋, 刘进超, 尹少鼎, 赵西坡. 聚丙烯蜡固-固相变材料的制备与工艺优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(1): 336-345.
[13]	秦振芳, 廖日红, 马伟芳. 吸收-微藻法固定燃气电厂低浓度CO₂同步产油技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(1): 94-106.
[14]	张辛亥, 赵思琛, 朱辉, 张首石, 王凯. 多种碳材料与碳酸钠复合后脱硫性能对比[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(S1): 424-435.
[15]	彭德其, 冯源, 王依然, 谭卓伟, 俞天兰, 吴淑英. 立式缩放管内液固颗粒群浓度分布与汇聚特性[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(9): 4662-4672.