微气泡和微液滴双强化脱硫反应器操作分析

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-1137

化工进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (S1): 142-147.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-1137

微气泡和微液滴双强化脱硫反应器操作分析

盛维武(), 程永攀(), 陈强, 李小婷, 魏嘉, 李琳鸽, 陈险峰

中石化炼化工程（集团）股份有限公司洛阳技术研发中心，河南洛阳 471003

收稿日期:2023-07-07 修回日期:2023-09-26 出版日期:2023-10-25 发布日期:2023-11-30
通讯作者: 程永攀
作者简介:盛维武（1982—），男，高级工程师，研究方向为石油化工设备。E-mail：shengweiwu.segr@sinopec.com。

Operating condition analysis of the microbubble and microdroplet dual-enhanced desulfurization reactor

SHENG Weiwu(), CHENG Yongpan(), CHEN Qiang, LI Xiaoting, WEI Jia, LI Linge, CHEN Xianfeng

Sinopec Engineering (Group) Company Luoyang R&D Center of Technology, Luoyang 471003, Henan, China

Received:2023-07-07 Revised:2023-09-26 Online:2023-10-25 Published:2023-11-30
Contact: CHENG Yongpan

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

中石化炼化工程（集团）股份有限公司洛阳技术研发中心开发了微气泡和微液滴双强化脱硫反应器。该脱硫反应器采用微气泡和微液滴双强化手段改进吸收方式，将过去脱硫塔内毫米级的大气泡变为200µm以下的微气泡，将液体流动方式由溢流式变为喷淋式，提高了醇胺法脱硫的气液传质效率，并采用新型内构件代替塔板，简化了脱硫塔的复杂程度，相比板式吸收塔具有更小的高度。试验探究了新型脱硫反应器运行时，溶剂液位高度、吸收温度及溶剂循环量对净化效率的影响情况，并考察了不同溶剂液位高度下的压力降。结果表明：该脱硫反应器的压力降较小，脱硫效率较高，能够满足净化气H₂S质量浓度≤50mg/m³的要求；当原料气处理量为50m³/h时，最佳操作条件为溶剂液位高度800mm、吸收温度40℃、溶剂循环量0.8m³/h。

关键词: 传质, 微气泡, 醇胺法脱硫, 反应器, 净化效率

Abstract:

Sinopec Engineering (Group) Company Luoyang R&D Center of Technology developed a microbubble and microdroplet dual-enhanced desulfurization reactor. The desulfurization reactor adopted microbubble and microdroplet enhanced absorption method, which changed the large millimeter bubbles in the desulfurization tower into microbubbles below 200µm, and changed the liquid flow mode from overflow to spray. The gas-liquid mass transfer efficiency was improved by this method, and the complexity of the desulfurization tower was simplified by using new internal components instead of the plates, and the reactor had a lower height than the plate tower. The effects of solvent height, absorption temperature and solvent circulation on purification efficiency were studied. The pressure drop at different solvent heights was also measured. The experimental results showed that the desulfurization reactor had low pressure drop and high desulfurization efficiency, and made the mass concentration of H₂S≤50mg/m³. When the flow rate of feed gas was 50m³/h, the best operating conditions could be: the solvent height was 800 mm, the absorption temperature was 40℃, and the solvent circulation was 0.8m³/h.

Key words: mass transfer, microbubble, alcohol-amine desulfurization, reactor, purification efficiency

中图分类号:

TE992.1

盛维武, 程永攀, 陈强, 李小婷, 魏嘉, 李琳鸽, 陈险峰. 微气泡和微液滴双强化脱硫反应器操作分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 142-147.

SHENG Weiwu, CHENG Yongpan, CHEN Qiang, LI Xiaoting, WEI Jia, LI Linge, CHEN Xianfeng. Operating condition analysis of the microbubble and microdroplet dual-enhanced desulfurization reactor[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 142-147.

图/表 8

图1 传质过程示意图

图2 新型脱硫反应器示意图

图3 微气泡产生效果

图4 试验装置流程示意图

图5 溶剂液位高度对净化气H2S浓度影响

图6 溶剂液位高度对压力降影响

图7 吸收温度对净化气H2S浓度影响

图8 溶剂循环量对净化气H2S浓度影响

参考文献 9

1	LIU Ke, WANG Xianglin, YUAN Qinghong, et al. Research on desulfurization and decarbonization process of highly sour natural gas[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2020, 49(3): 14-20.
2	张宁峰. MDEA脱硫胺液发泡原因分析及对策[J]. 石油化工应用, 2020, 39(3): 116-118.
	ZHANG Ningfeng. Cause analysis and countermeasures of foaming in MDEA desulfurization amine solution[J]. Petrochemical Industry Application, 2020, 39(3): 116-118.
3	孙腾民, 陈义明, 王永超, 等. 浅谈填料塔内件结构的改进[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2019, 39(4): 13-14.
	SUN Tengmin, CHEN Yiming, WANG Yongchao, et al. Discussion on the improvement of internals structure of packed tower[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality, 2019, 39(4): 13-14.
4	张学辉, 高洪涛. 塔内件设计研究[J]. 化工设计通讯, 2021, 47(2): 53-54, 64.
	ZHANG Xuehui, GAO Hongtao. Tower internal design research[J]. Chemical Engineering Design Communications, 2021, 47(2): 53-54, 64.
5	李辉, 李干禄, 何峰, 等. 微气泡耦合生物反应器的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(12): 4758-4765.
	LI Hui, LI Ganlu, HE Feng, et al. Research progress of microbubble coupled bioreactor[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(12): 4758-4765.
6	杜明辉, 王勇, 高群丽, 等. 臭氧微气泡处理有机废水的效果与机制[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(12): 6907-6915.
	DU Minghui, WANG Yong, GAO Qunli, et al. Mechanism and efficiency of ozone microbubble treatment of organic wastewater[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(12): 6907-6915.
7	贺彦涛, 王玉环, 蔺爱国, 等. 旋流微气泡气浮除油过程的数值模拟[J]. 石油学报(石油加工), 2020, 36(2): 349-356.
	HE Yantao, WANG Yuhuan, LIN Aiguo, et al. Numerical simulation of oil removal process by air flotation of swirling micro bubbles[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing Section), 2020, 36(2): 349-356.
1	刘可, 王向林, 袁庆洪, 等. 高酸性天然气脱硫脱碳工艺技术研究[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2020, 49(3): 14-20.
8	RINKER Edward B, OELSCHLAGER David W, Tomas COLUSSI A, et al. Viscosity, density, and surface tension of binary mixtures of water and N-methyldiethanolamine and water and diethanolamine and tertiary mixtures of these amines with water over the temperature range 20—100℃[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 1994, 39(2): 392-395.
9	DORAISWAMY L K, SHARMA M M.Heterogeneous reactions:analysis, examples, and reactor design. Volume 2: Fluid-fluid-solid reactions[M]. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1986.

[1]	黄益平, 李婷, 郑龙云, 戚傲, 陈政霖, 史天昊, 张新宇, 郭凯, 胡猛, 倪泽雨, 刘辉, 夏苗, 主凯, 刘春江. 三级环流反应器中气液流动与传质规律[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 175-188.
[2]	杨寒月, 孔令真, 陈家庆, 孙欢, 宋家恺, 王思诚, 孔标. 微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器脱碳性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 197-204.
[3]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[4]	许家珩, 李永胜, 罗春欢, 苏庆泉. 甲醇水蒸气重整工艺的优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 41-46.
[5]	邵博识, 谭宏博. 锯齿波纹板对挥发性有机物低温脱除过程强化模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 84-93.
[6]	刘炫麟, 王驿凯, 戴苏洲, 殷勇高. 热泵中氨基甲酸铵分解反应特性及反应器结构优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4522-4530.
[7]	罗成, 范晓勇, 朱永红, 田丰, 崔楼伟, 杜崇鹏, 王飞利, 李冬, 郑化安. 中低温煤焦油加氢反应器不同分配器中液体分布的CFD模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4538-4549.
[8]	程涛, 崔瑞利, 宋俊男, 张天琪, 张耘赫, 梁世杰, 朴实. 渣油加氢装置杂质沉积规律与压降升高机理分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4616-4627.
[9]	邓建, 王凯, 骆广生. 面向硝基化学品安全生产的绝热连续微反应技术发展及思考[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3923-3925.
[10]	李洞, 王倩倩, 张亮, 李俊, 付乾, 朱恂, 廖强. 非水系纳米流体热再生液流电池串联堆性能特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4238-4246.
[11]	鲁少杰, 刘佳, 冀芊竹, 李萍, 韩月阳, 陶敏, 梁文俊. 硅藻土基复合填料制备及滴滤塔去除二甲苯的性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3884-3892.
[12]	王松松, 刘培乔, 陶长元, 王运东, 陈恩之, 苗迎彬, 赵风轩, 刘作华. 工业物联网技术在搅拌反应器领域的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3331-3339.
[13]	刘卫孝, 刘洋, 高福磊, 汪伟, 汪营磊. 微反应器在含能材料合成与品质提升中的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3349-3364.
[14]	李瑞东, 黄辉, 同国虎, 王跃社. 原油精馏塔中铵盐吸湿特性及其腐蚀行为[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2809-2818.
[15]	章凯, 金捍宇, 刘思宇, 王帅. 鼓泡流态化气泡间相互作用下相间传质过程的模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2828-2835.

微气泡和微液滴双强化脱硫反应器操作分析

Operating condition analysis of the microbubble and microdroplet dual-enhanced desulfurization reactor

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 9

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价